Background: Induction chemotherapy (IC) regimens such as gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GP), docetaxel plus cisplatin plus fluorouracil (TPF), and paclitaxel plus cisplatin (TP) are optional clinical options for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC).
Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity profiles of the GP, TPF, and TP induction regimens in LA-NPC.
Design: This was a retrospective study.
Methods: This multicenter retrospective study enrolled 722 patients with stage III-IVA LA-NPC who received GP, TPF, or TP IC. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed before comparing survival outcomes and acute grades 3-4 toxicities among the three groups. Survival outcomes included the overall survival (OS), failure-free survival (FFS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS).
Results: The original cohort comprised 722 patients (247 in the GP group, 240 in the TPF group, and 235 in the TP group). After PSM analysis, the GP group showed a better 3-year OS rate than the TP group (p = 0.019), while the 3-year OS rate revealed no difference between the GP group and TPF group and between the TPF group and TP group. There were no significant differences in the 3-year FFS, 3-year LRFS, and 3-year DMFS rates between and within the three groups. During the induction period, the toxicity of the three regimens was generally acceptable and manageable.
Conclusion: The GP induction regimen demonstrated superior efficacy in terms of OS, with its favorable safety profile. Compared with the TPF and TP regimens, the GP induction regimen represents a more clinically advantageous treatment option for LA-NPC.
{"title":"Comparing three induction regimens for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis.","authors":"Jinxuan Dai, Yu Pan, Yuanyuan Liu, Yufei Pan, Defeng Wang, Yi Liang, Yuejia Wei, Hengwei Chen, Bin Zhang, Xiaojuan Wu, Bing Liu, Xiangyun Kong, Yunyan Mo, Xiaolan Ruan, Shufang Liao, Xiaoping Lin, Chen Huang, Jinping Xu, Fei Mo, Wei Jiang","doi":"10.1177/17588359251413429","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17588359251413429","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Induction chemotherapy (IC) regimens such as gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GP), docetaxel plus cisplatin plus fluorouracil (TPF), and paclitaxel plus cisplatin (TP) are optional clinical options for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity profiles of the GP, TPF, and TP induction regimens in LA-NPC.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective study enrolled 722 patients with stage III-IVA LA-NPC who received GP, TPF, or TP IC. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed before comparing survival outcomes and acute grades 3-4 toxicities among the three groups. Survival outcomes included the overall survival (OS), failure-free survival (FFS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The original cohort comprised 722 patients (247 in the GP group, 240 in the TPF group, and 235 in the TP group). After PSM analysis, the GP group showed a better 3-year OS rate than the TP group (<i>p</i> = 0.019), while the 3-year OS rate revealed no difference between the GP group and TPF group and between the TPF group and TP group. There were no significant differences in the 3-year FFS, 3-year LRFS, and 3-year DMFS rates between and within the three groups. During the induction period, the toxicity of the three regimens was generally acceptable and manageable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The GP induction regimen demonstrated superior efficacy in terms of OS, with its favorable safety profile. Compared with the TPF and TP regimens, the GP induction regimen represents a more clinically advantageous treatment option for LA-NPC.</p>","PeriodicalId":23053,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","volume":"18 ","pages":"17588359251413429"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12827918/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146053620","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-19eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1177/17588359251412729
Ronen Stoff, David M Routman, Mariana Yalon, Aaron W Bogan, Matthew S Block, Tina J Hieken
Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is predictive of recurrence in resected stage III melanoma, yet its role in the neoadjuvant setting for clinical stage III (cSIII) is unclear.
Objective: Assess the association between ctDNA and outcomes following neoadjuvant immunotherapy (IO) + targeted therapy (TT) in cSIII melanoma.
Design: Patients in the NeoACTIVATE study were treated with neoadjuvant IO + TT, underwent lymphadenectomy, and received adjuvant immunotherapy.
Methods: Patients with ctDNA testing performed at baseline, pre- and post-operation were analyzed. Baseline positron emission tomography-computed tomography volumetrics and surgical, major pathological responses (MPR) were assessed.
Results: Thirteen patients had serial ctDNA, 10 (77%) were detectable at baseline, and 9/10 (90%) had ctDNA clearance. Seven (54%) achieved MPR, all with undetectable preoperative ctDNA, yet 3/7 (43%) had disease recurrence.
Conclusion: ctDNA and MPR are poor predictors of recurrence following neoadjuvant IO + TT for cSIII melanoma patients. Further studies are warranted to define the role of ctDNA in this setting.
{"title":"Biomarker analysis of circulating tumor DNA in clinical stage III melanoma patients treated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with targeted therapy.","authors":"Ronen Stoff, David M Routman, Mariana Yalon, Aaron W Bogan, Matthew S Block, Tina J Hieken","doi":"10.1177/17588359251412729","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17588359251412729","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is predictive of recurrence in resected stage III melanoma, yet its role in the neoadjuvant setting for clinical stage III (cSIII) is unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Assess the association between ctDNA and outcomes following neoadjuvant immunotherapy (IO) + targeted therapy (TT) in cSIII melanoma.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Patients in the NeoACTIVATE study were treated with neoadjuvant IO + TT, underwent lymphadenectomy, and received adjuvant immunotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with ctDNA testing performed at baseline, pre- and post-operation were analyzed. Baseline positron emission tomography-computed tomography volumetrics and surgical, major pathological responses (MPR) were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen patients had serial ctDNA, 10 (77%) were detectable at baseline, and 9/10 (90%) had ctDNA clearance. Seven (54%) achieved MPR, all with undetectable preoperative ctDNA, yet 3/7 (43%) had disease recurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ctDNA and MPR are poor predictors of recurrence following neoadjuvant IO + TT for cSIII melanoma patients. Further studies are warranted to define the role of ctDNA in this setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":23053,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","volume":"18 ","pages":"17588359251412729"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12816504/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146019621","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-19eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1177/17588359251411660
Yu-Ting Lu, Xiao-Xia Huang, Wen-Chuan Chen, Qi-Yun Xiao, Jian-Li Duan, Zi-Jing Li, William Pat Fong, Feng-Hua Wang, Yu-Hong Li, De-Shen Wang
Background: Postoperative early recurrence (PER) remains a major challenge to long-term survival after successful conversion therapy and curative resection for initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Existing prediction models rely heavily on clinicopathological parameters and lack molecular biomarkers, limiting their predictive accuracy.
Objectives: To define the optimal recurrence-free survival (RFS) cutoff for PER and develop a comprehensive predictive nomogram incorporating molecular and clinical variables to predict PER in patients with initially unresectable CRLM who undergo curative resection following conversion therapy.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Methods: Clinicopathological and molecular data from 411 patients with initially unresectable CRLM undergoing curative resection after conversion therapy were analyzed. The minimum p value approach determined the optimal RFS cutoff for PER. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression identified significant predictors, followed by multivariate logistic regression to build a nomogram. Model performance was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).
Results: PER was defined as recurrence within 4 months postoperatively. Independent predictors included dual preoperative positivity for CEA and CA19-9 (odds ratio (OR) = 2.437, p < 0.001), number of liver metastases (OR = 1.061, p < 0.001), tumor progression during the chemotherapy-to-surgery interval (OR = 2.837, p = 0.003), KRAS exon 2 mutations (OR = 1.927, p = 0.006), and BRAF V600E mutations (OR = 2.410, p = 0.002). An AUC of 0.703 (95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.650-0.756) was achieved, with an internal validation AUC of 0.697 (95% CI: 0.670-0.723). Calibration curves showed good agreement (p > 0.05), and DCA indicated clinical benefit at recurrence risk thresholds above 30%.
Conclusion: We identified 4 months as the optimal RFS threshold for PER and proposed a novel nomogram integrating molecular and clinical factors for perioperative decision-making in patients with initially unresectable CRLM.
背景:对于最初不可切除的结直肠癌肝转移瘤(CRLM),术后早期复发(PER)仍然是成功转化治疗和根治性切除后长期生存的主要挑战。现有的预测模型严重依赖临床病理参数,缺乏分子生物标志物,限制了其预测准确性。目的:定义PER的最佳无复发生存(RFS)截止时间,并开发一个综合分子和临床变量的预测图,以预测最初不可切除的CRLM患者在转换治疗后接受根治性切除的PER。设计:回顾性队列研究。方法:对411例最初不可切除的CRLM患者经转化治疗后行根治性切除的临床病理和分子资料进行分析。最小p值法确定了PER的最佳RFS截止值。最小绝对收缩和选择算子回归确定了显著的预测因子,然后通过多元逻辑回归建立了正态图。使用曲线下面积(AUC)、校准曲线和决策曲线分析(DCA)评估模型性能。结果:PER定义为术后4个月内复发。独立预测因子包括术前CEA和CA19-9双阳性(比值比(OR) = 2.437, p < 0.001)、肝转移数(OR = 1.061, p < 0.001)、化疗至手术期间肿瘤进展(OR = 2.837, p = 0.003)、KRAS外显子2突变(OR = 1.927, p = 0.006)和BRAF V600E突变(OR = 2.410, p = 0.002)。AUC为0.703(95%置信区间(CI): 0.650-0.756),内部验证AUC为0.697 (95% CI: 0.670-0.723)。校正曲线显示良好的一致性(p < 0.05), DCA显示复发风险阈值高于30%时临床获益。结论:我们确定了4个月为PER的最佳RFS阈值,并提出了一种整合分子和临床因素的新nomogram,用于对最初不可切除的CRLM患者进行围手术期决策。
{"title":"A clinical-molecular nomogram for predicting early recurrence following resection of initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases.","authors":"Yu-Ting Lu, Xiao-Xia Huang, Wen-Chuan Chen, Qi-Yun Xiao, Jian-Li Duan, Zi-Jing Li, William Pat Fong, Feng-Hua Wang, Yu-Hong Li, De-Shen Wang","doi":"10.1177/17588359251411660","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17588359251411660","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative early recurrence (PER) remains a major challenge to long-term survival after successful conversion therapy and curative resection for initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Existing prediction models rely heavily on clinicopathological parameters and lack molecular biomarkers, limiting their predictive accuracy.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To define the optimal recurrence-free survival (RFS) cutoff for PER and develop a comprehensive predictive nomogram incorporating molecular and clinical variables to predict PER in patients with initially unresectable CRLM who undergo curative resection following conversion therapy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinicopathological and molecular data from 411 patients with initially unresectable CRLM undergoing curative resection after conversion therapy were analyzed. The minimum <i>p</i> value approach determined the optimal RFS cutoff for PER. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression identified significant predictors, followed by multivariate logistic regression to build a nomogram. Model performance was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PER was defined as recurrence within 4 months postoperatively. Independent predictors included dual preoperative positivity for CEA and CA19-9 (odds ratio (OR) = 2.437, <i>p</i> < 0.001), number of liver metastases (OR = 1.061, <i>p</i> < 0.001), tumor progression during the chemotherapy-to-surgery interval (OR = 2.837, <i>p</i> = 0.003), <i>KRAS</i> exon 2 mutations (OR = 1.927, <i>p</i> = 0.006), and <i>BRAF V600E</i> mutations (OR = 2.410, <i>p</i> = 0.002). An AUC of 0.703 (95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.650-0.756) was achieved, with an internal validation AUC of 0.697 (95% CI: 0.670-0.723). Calibration curves showed good agreement (<i>p</i> > 0.05), and DCA indicated clinical benefit at recurrence risk thresholds above 30%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified 4 months as the optimal RFS threshold for PER and proposed a novel nomogram integrating molecular and clinical factors for perioperative decision-making in patients with initially unresectable CRLM.</p>","PeriodicalId":23053,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","volume":"18 ","pages":"17588359251411660"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12816525/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146019613","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-19eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1177/17588359251414132
Xingyu Du, Huan Li, Song Guan, Hui Wang, Li Wen, Cuimeng Tian
Background: The benefit of adding immunotherapy to induction chemotherapy before definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in older patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear.
Objectives: This real-world study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of induction chemoimmunotherapy followed by CRT in this patient population.
Design: A real-world multicenter study.
Methods: In this retrospective, multicenter study, we enrolled patients aged ⩾65 years with unresectable stage III NSCLC who received CRT between January 2014 and June 2024. Patients were stratified into two groups: the induction chemoimmunotherapy group (I-CRT), who received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy before CRT, and the control group (Non-I-CRT), who received CRT without any prior immunotherapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline characteristics. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
Results: Among 260 patients, 141 received I-CRT and 119 constituted the Non-I-CRT control group. After 1:1 PSM (97 patients per group), the I-CRT group showed significantly improved outcomes compared to the Non-I-CRT group: median PFS was 23.4 versus 11.6 months (p < 0.001), and median OS was 46.0 versus 24.4 months (p = 0.009). The incidence of Grade 3/4 adverse events was comparable between the matched groups (20.6% vs 28.9%, p = 0.52).
Conclusion: Induction chemoimmunotherapy before CRT is feasible in selected older NSCLC patients, offering survival benefits without significant safety concerns.
背景:对于无法切除的III期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)老年患者,在最终放化疗(CRT)前,在诱导化疗中加入免疫治疗的益处尚不清楚。目的:这项现实世界的研究旨在评估诱导化疗免疫治疗后CRT在该患者群体中的疗效和安全性。设计:一个真实世界的多中心研究。方法:在这项回顾性的多中心研究中,我们招募了2014年1月至2024年6月期间接受CRT治疗的年龄大于或小于65岁的不可切除III期NSCLC患者。患者被分为两组:诱导化疗免疫治疗组(I-CRT),在CRT前接受PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂加化疗;对照组(Non-I-CRT),在没有任何免疫治疗的情况下接受CRT。倾向评分匹配(PSM)用于平衡基线特征。主要终点为无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。结果:260例患者中,141例接受I-CRT治疗,119例为非I-CRT对照组。1:1 PSM(每组97例患者)后,与非I-CRT组相比,I-CRT组的结果显着改善:中位PFS为23.4个月比11.6个月(p < 0.001),中位OS为46.0个月比24.4个月(p = 0.009)。3/4级不良事件的发生率在匹配组之间具有可比性(20.6% vs 28.9%, p = 0.52)。结论:在选定的老年非小细胞肺癌患者中,在CRT前进行诱导化疗免疫治疗是可行的,在没有明显安全性问题的情况下提供生存益处。
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of induction chemoimmunotherapy in older patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC: a real-world multicenter study.","authors":"Xingyu Du, Huan Li, Song Guan, Hui Wang, Li Wen, Cuimeng Tian","doi":"10.1177/17588359251414132","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17588359251414132","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The benefit of adding immunotherapy to induction chemotherapy before definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in older patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This real-world study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of induction chemoimmunotherapy followed by CRT in this patient population.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A real-world multicenter study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective, multicenter study, we enrolled patients aged ⩾65 years with unresectable stage III NSCLC who received CRT between January 2014 and June 2024. Patients were stratified into two groups: the induction chemoimmunotherapy group (I-CRT), who received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy before CRT, and the control group (Non-I-CRT), who received CRT without any prior immunotherapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline characteristics. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 260 patients, 141 received I-CRT and 119 constituted the Non-I-CRT control group. After 1:1 PSM (97 patients per group), the I-CRT group showed significantly improved outcomes compared to the Non-I-CRT group: median PFS was 23.4 versus 11.6 months (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and median OS was 46.0 versus 24.4 months (<i>p</i> = 0.009). The incidence of Grade 3/4 adverse events was comparable between the matched groups (20.6% vs 28.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.52).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Induction chemoimmunotherapy before CRT is feasible in selected older NSCLC patients, offering survival benefits without significant safety concerns.</p>","PeriodicalId":23053,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","volume":"18 ","pages":"17588359251414132"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12816512/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146019676","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-17eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1177/17588359251414117
Ilaria Attili, Pasquale Pisapia, Gianluca Spitaleri, Pamela Trillo Aliaga, Ester Del Signore, Valerio Maria Napoli, Antonio Passaro, Umberto Malapelle, Giancarlo Troncone, Filippo de Marinis
Early-stage (I-III) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) can harbor oncogenic driver mutations that have critical implications for patient management and outcomes. Historically, molecular testing in resected NSCLC was limited, often focusing only on EGFR mutations or ALK rearrangements due to the lack of approved targeted therapies in the adjuvant setting until recently. However, with the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) and emerging evidence of actionable mutations in early-stage tumors, comprehensive genomic profiling is becoming increasingly relevant in this setting. Identifying these alterations is clinically significant: the presence of specific mutations can directly influence adjuvant treatment planning and refine the role of immunotherapy. Beyond guiding therapy selection, molecular profiles also provide prognostic insight: certain driver subtypes have been associated with higher recurrence risk in early-stage patients, suggesting a need for intensified surveillance. The expanding role of NGS enables personalized postoperative strategies, including tailored follow-up intervals and potential circulating tumor DNA monitoring to detect minimal residual disease. In summary, incorporating broad molecular testing in early-stage NSCLC empowers clinicians to optimize adjuvant treatment decisions and surveillance strategies, ultimately aiming to improve patient outcomes through precision oncology.
{"title":"Actionable driver gene alterations in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a review.","authors":"Ilaria Attili, Pasquale Pisapia, Gianluca Spitaleri, Pamela Trillo Aliaga, Ester Del Signore, Valerio Maria Napoli, Antonio Passaro, Umberto Malapelle, Giancarlo Troncone, Filippo de Marinis","doi":"10.1177/17588359251414117","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17588359251414117","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Early-stage (I-III) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) can harbor oncogenic driver mutations that have critical implications for patient management and outcomes. Historically, molecular testing in resected NSCLC was limited, often focusing only on <i>EGFR</i> mutations or <i>ALK</i> rearrangements due to the lack of approved targeted therapies in the adjuvant setting until recently. However, with the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) and emerging evidence of actionable mutations in early-stage tumors, comprehensive genomic profiling is becoming increasingly relevant in this setting. Identifying these alterations is clinically significant: the presence of specific mutations can directly influence adjuvant treatment planning and refine the role of immunotherapy. Beyond guiding therapy selection, molecular profiles also provide prognostic insight: certain driver subtypes have been associated with higher recurrence risk in early-stage patients, suggesting a need for intensified surveillance. The expanding role of NGS enables personalized postoperative strategies, including tailored follow-up intervals and potential circulating tumor DNA monitoring to detect minimal residual disease. In summary, incorporating broad molecular testing in early-stage NSCLC empowers clinicians to optimize adjuvant treatment decisions and surveillance strategies, ultimately aiming to improve patient outcomes through precision oncology.</p>","PeriodicalId":23053,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","volume":"18 ","pages":"17588359251414117"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12812201/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146003595","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) presents a significant burden on lower gastrointestinal diseases, with current treatment strategies primarily involving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by radical surgery. However, patient responses to nCRT exhibit significant variability, highlighting the need for personalized therapeutic approaches. Emerging evidence suggests that the gut microbiota plays a critical role in influencing both treatment outcomes and toxicity in LARC patients. Intestinal dysbiosis has been linked to LARC progression and may affect the efficacy and adverse effects of nCRT. This narrative review critically evaluates the current literature on the relationship between gut microbiota and nCRT in LARC. Certain microbial taxa, such as Alistipes spp., Akkermansia muciniphila, and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, have been associated with enhanced therapeutic responses, while others, such as Fusobacterium nucleatum and Enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis, may contribute to treatment resistance and exacerbate adverse effects. We also discuss novel mechanisms by which specific gut microbiota and their metabolites modulate nCRT response distinct from conventional immune regulation, alongside emerging strategies for microbiota modulation, including dietary interventions, probiotics, prebiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation. Despite challenges in standardizing microbiota analysis and fully understanding the precise mechanisms, microbiota-targeted interventions offer a promising avenue for personalized treatment in LARC, with the potential to improve patient outcomes and quality of life.
{"title":"Gut microbiota and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a review of current evidence and emerging insights.","authors":"Zhiwei Wu, Zihan Yang, Chengzhen Lyu, Bo Sun, Ruikai Zhang, Hongbo Li, Jian Chen","doi":"10.1177/17588359251413948","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17588359251413948","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) presents a significant burden on lower gastrointestinal diseases, with current treatment strategies primarily involving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by radical surgery. However, patient responses to nCRT exhibit significant variability, highlighting the need for personalized therapeutic approaches. Emerging evidence suggests that the gut microbiota plays a critical role in influencing both treatment outcomes and toxicity in LARC patients. Intestinal dysbiosis has been linked to LARC progression and may affect the efficacy and adverse effects of nCRT. This narrative review critically evaluates the current literature on the relationship between gut microbiota and nCRT in LARC. Certain microbial taxa, such as <i>Alistipes</i> spp., <i>Akkermansia muciniphila</i>, and <i>Faecalibacterium prausnitzii</i>, have been associated with enhanced therapeutic responses, while others, such as <i>Fusobacterium nucleatum</i> and Enterotoxigenic <i>Bacteroides fragilis</i>, may contribute to treatment resistance and exacerbate adverse effects. We also discuss novel mechanisms by which specific gut microbiota and their metabolites modulate nCRT response distinct from conventional immune regulation, alongside emerging strategies for microbiota modulation, including dietary interventions, probiotics, prebiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation. Despite challenges in standardizing microbiota analysis and fully understanding the precise mechanisms, microbiota-targeted interventions offer a promising avenue for personalized treatment in LARC, with the potential to improve patient outcomes and quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":23053,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","volume":"18 ","pages":"17588359251413948"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12812205/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146003562","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The effect of vulnerability on the outcomes of patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) remains unclear.
Objectives: To examine the impact of vulnerability on the outcomes in patients with locally advanced NSCLC undergoing CCRT.
Design: We analyzed data from the Japan Lung Cancer Society Integrated Clinical Trial Database, which included 1288 patients with locally advanced NSCLC treated with CCRT.
Methods: Vulnerability was defined as meeting one or more of the following: age ⩾75 years; history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or emphysema; chronic kidney disease with at least one other comorbidity; or cancer cachexia (C-reactive protein >1.0 mg/dL and albumin <3.5 g/dL).
Results: Among 741 eligible patients, 283 (38.2%) were classified as vulnerable. Vulnerable patients had significantly shorter overall survival (OS; 19.7 vs 27.4 months, p = 0.003), whereas progression-free survival (PFS) did not differ significantly (8.8 vs 10.4 months, p = 0.151). In multivariate analysis adjusted for factors including cisplatin (CDDP) use, the association between vulnerability and OS was attenuated (hazard ratio = 1.221, 95% confidence interval: 0.959-1.555, p = 0.105). The vulnerable patients were significantly less likely to undergo subsequent therapies (60.4% vs 71.6%, p = 0.003). Among the vulnerability components, cachexia showed the strongest association with shorter PFS (8.0 vs 10.5 months, p = 0.009) and OS (16.5 vs 27.4 months, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Clinical vulnerability was associated with poorer OS after CCRT, mediated by multiple factors, including reduced CDDP use, lower subsequent therapy rates, and cachexia. Individualized strategies that balance treatment intensity, supportive care, and access to post-CCRT are essential for improving outcomes.
背景:易感因素对局部晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)同步放化疗(CCRT)患者预后的影响尚不清楚。目的:探讨易损性对局部晚期NSCLC行CCRT患者预后的影响。设计:我们分析了来自日本肺癌协会综合临床试验数据库的数据,其中包括1288例接受CCRT治疗的局部晚期NSCLC患者。方法:脆弱性被定义为满足以下一个或多个条件:年龄大于或等于75岁;慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)或肺气肿病史;慢性肾脏疾病并至少一种其他合并症;结果:在741例符合条件的患者中,283例(38.2%)被归类为易感患者。易感患者的总生存期显著缩短(OS: 19.7个月vs 27.4个月,p = 0.003),而无进展生存期(PFS)无显著差异(8.8个月vs 10.4个月,p = 0.151)。在调整了顺铂(CDDP)使用等因素的多变量分析中,脆弱性与OS之间的关联减弱(风险比= 1.221,95%可信区间:0.959-1.555,p = 0.105)。易感患者接受后续治疗的可能性显著降低(60.4% vs 71.6%, p = 0.003)。在易损性成分中,恶病质与较短的PFS (8.0 vs 10.5个月,p = 0.009)和OS (16.5 vs 27.4个月,p)的相关性最强。结论:临床易损性与CCRT后较差的OS相关,其介导因素包括CDDP使用减少、后续治疗率降低和恶病质。平衡治疗强度、支持性护理和获得ccrt后治疗的个性化策略对于改善结果至关重要。
{"title":"Impact of vulnerability on concurrent chemoradiotherapy outcomes in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer using an integrated clinical trial database.","authors":"Kenji Morimoto, Tadaaki Yamada, Naoya Nishioka, Nobuyuki Yamamoto, Seiji Niho, Isamu Okamoto, Katsuyuki Hotta, Hiroaki Okamoto, Shunichi Sugawara, Toshio Shimokawa, Yuichi Ozawa, Satoshi Oizumi, Koichi Takayama","doi":"10.1177/17588359251414535","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17588359251414535","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effect of vulnerability on the outcomes of patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the impact of vulnerability on the outcomes in patients with locally advanced NSCLC undergoing CCRT.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We analyzed data from the Japan Lung Cancer Society Integrated Clinical Trial Database, which included 1288 patients with locally advanced NSCLC treated with CCRT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Vulnerability was defined as meeting one or more of the following: age ⩾75 years; history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or emphysema; chronic kidney disease with at least one other comorbidity; or cancer cachexia (C-reactive protein >1.0 mg/dL and albumin <3.5 g/dL).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 741 eligible patients, 283 (38.2%) were classified as vulnerable. Vulnerable patients had significantly shorter overall survival (OS; 19.7 vs 27.4 months, <i>p</i> = 0.003), whereas progression-free survival (PFS) did not differ significantly (8.8 vs 10.4 months, <i>p</i> = 0.151). In multivariate analysis adjusted for factors including cisplatin (CDDP) use, the association between vulnerability and OS was attenuated (hazard ratio = 1.221, 95% confidence interval: 0.959-1.555, <i>p</i> = 0.105). The vulnerable patients were significantly less likely to undergo subsequent therapies (60.4% vs 71.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.003). Among the vulnerability components, cachexia showed the strongest association with shorter PFS (8.0 vs 10.5 months, <i>p</i> = 0.009) and OS (16.5 vs 27.4 months, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinical vulnerability was associated with poorer OS after CCRT, mediated by multiple factors, including reduced CDDP use, lower subsequent therapy rates, and cachexia. Individualized strategies that balance treatment intensity, supportive care, and access to post-CCRT are essential for improving outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23053,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","volume":"18 ","pages":"17588359251414535"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12812199/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146003534","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains a global health challenge with rising incidence, especially in HPV-associated subtypes. The mismatch repair (MMR) system maintains genomic stability, and its deficiency has been linked to tumor immunogenicity and response to immunotherapy in several cancers. However, its role in HNSCC, particularly in the context of HPV status, remains poorly defined.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the imbalance expression of MMR proteins and their association with clinical features and survival in HNSCC.
Design: A retrospective, clinicopathological correlation study.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 369 HNSCC specimens. Tissue microarrays were constructed and immunohistochemically stained for four key MMR proteins (MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, and MLH1) and p16 (as an HPV surrogate). Expression patterns were correlated with clinicopathological variables, immune cell infiltration, and survival outcomes.
Results: Among all HNSCC patients, MMR protein expression was preserved in all but one case. MSH2 and PMS2 showed consistently higher nuclear positivity than their partners, MSH6 and MLH1. These imbalances were more pronounced in p16-negative tumors (p < 0.001), whereas p16-positive tumors showed balanced expression. Expression patterns varied by sex, tumor site, drinking history, and AJCC stage. Moreover, MSH6 was significantly lower than MSH2 in nondrinkers (p = 0.039), and PMS2 was lower in advanced-stage patients (p = 0.023). Immunologically, MSH2 expression positively correlated with CD8⁺ T cells in nontumor tissue, while MSH6 and PMS2/MLH1 ratios were inversely correlated with CD4⁺ T cells in tumor tissue. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that lower MSH2 expression was significantly associated with improved overall survival (p = 0.030).
Conclusion: MMR protein expression in HNSCC varies by HPV status and demographic factors and is linked to differential immune infiltration. These findings suggest that MMR protein imbalance may influence tumor immunogenicity and could potentially serve as a biomarker to inform therapeutic strategies in the immunotherapy era, especially in p16-negative tumors.
{"title":"Mismatch repair protein imbalance in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: associations with clinical features and survival.","authors":"Chulin Yang, Mingyuan Du, Lili Liu, Shaohang Cai, Wanming Hu, Shida Yan, Menghua Li, Xianlu Gao, Shiyan Yang, Liji Zheng, Wei Liao, Ming Song, Shuwei Chen","doi":"10.1177/17588359251408596","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17588359251408596","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains a global health challenge with rising incidence, especially in HPV-associated subtypes. The mismatch repair (MMR) system maintains genomic stability, and its deficiency has been linked to tumor immunogenicity and response to immunotherapy in several cancers. However, its role in HNSCC, particularly in the context of HPV status, remains poorly defined.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the imbalance expression of MMR proteins and their association with clinical features and survival in HNSCC.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective, clinicopathological correlation study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 369 HNSCC specimens. Tissue microarrays were constructed and immunohistochemically stained for four key MMR proteins (MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, and MLH1) and p16 (as an HPV surrogate). Expression patterns were correlated with clinicopathological variables, immune cell infiltration, and survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among all HNSCC patients, MMR protein expression was preserved in all but one case. MSH2 and PMS2 showed consistently higher nuclear positivity than their partners, MSH6 and MLH1. These imbalances were more pronounced in p16-negative tumors (<i>p</i> < 0.001), whereas p16-positive tumors showed balanced expression. Expression patterns varied by sex, tumor site, drinking history, and AJCC stage. Moreover, MSH6 was significantly lower than MSH2 in nondrinkers (<i>p</i> = 0.039), and PMS2 was lower in advanced-stage patients (<i>p</i> = 0.023). Immunologically, MSH2 expression positively correlated with CD8⁺ T cells in nontumor tissue, while MSH6 and PMS2/MLH1 ratios were inversely correlated with CD4⁺ T cells in tumor tissue. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that lower MSH2 expression was significantly associated with improved overall survival (<i>p</i> = 0.030).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MMR protein expression in HNSCC varies by HPV status and demographic factors and is linked to differential immune infiltration. These findings suggest that MMR protein imbalance may influence tumor immunogenicity and could potentially serve as a biomarker to inform therapeutic strategies in the immunotherapy era, especially in p16-negative tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":23053,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","volume":"18 ","pages":"17588359251408596"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12811559/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145998849","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-11eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1177/17588359251409047
Buraq Ahmed, Praful Ravi
Radioligand therapy (RLT) has reshaped the treatment landscape of advanced prostate cancer (PCa), offering a precision medicine approach that integrates molecular imaging with targeted radionuclide delivery, in which radioactive isotopes are bound to molecules that aim to selectively target cancer cells. The approval of 177Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-617 for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer marked a major milestone, with randomized trials (VISION, PSMAfore) demonstrating significant improvements in overall and progression-free survival compared to standard therapies. Beyond beta-emitting agents, next-generation alpha emitters such as actinium-225 and beta/Auger electron-emitting isotopes like terbium‑161 are in active development, aiming to overcome resistance and target micrometastases with greater potency. Combination approaches, pairing RLT with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, immune checkpoint blockade, or androgen receptor pathway inhibitors, for example, are under intense investigation, with early phase data indicating potential efficacy. Technical advances in imaging, personalized dosimetry, and molecular diagnostics may enable more precise patient selection and adaptive treatment strategies, such as dose adjustment based on dosimetry or target expression. Emerging RLT platforms target additional tumor markers, including human kallikrein 2 and six-transmembrane epithelial antigen of the prostate-2 as well as bispecific ligands, addressing disease heterogeneity and expanding therapeutic reach. Nonetheless, challenges remain around long-term hematologic and renal safety, radionuclide supply, protocol standardization, and global accessibility. Ongoing and future multicenter trials, collaborative consortia, and innovations in theranostics will be critical to defining optimal patient selection, sequencing with existing therapies, and embedding RLT as a key pillar in the management of advanced PCa.
{"title":"Current and future perspectives on radioligand therapy in advanced prostate cancer.","authors":"Buraq Ahmed, Praful Ravi","doi":"10.1177/17588359251409047","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17588359251409047","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Radioligand therapy (RLT) has reshaped the treatment landscape of advanced prostate cancer (PCa), offering a precision medicine approach that integrates molecular imaging with targeted radionuclide delivery, in which radioactive isotopes are bound to molecules that aim to selectively target cancer cells. The approval of <sup>177</sup>Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-617 for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer marked a major milestone, with randomized trials (VISION, PSMAfore) demonstrating significant improvements in overall and progression-free survival compared to standard therapies. Beyond beta-emitting agents, next-generation alpha emitters such as actinium-225 and beta/Auger electron-emitting isotopes like terbium‑161 are in active development, aiming to overcome resistance and target micrometastases with greater potency. Combination approaches, pairing RLT with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, immune checkpoint blockade, or androgen receptor pathway inhibitors, for example, are under intense investigation, with early phase data indicating potential efficacy. Technical advances in imaging, personalized dosimetry, and molecular diagnostics may enable more precise patient selection and adaptive treatment strategies, such as dose adjustment based on dosimetry or target expression. Emerging RLT platforms target additional tumor markers, including human kallikrein 2 and six-transmembrane epithelial antigen of the prostate-2 as well as bispecific ligands, addressing disease heterogeneity and expanding therapeutic reach. Nonetheless, challenges remain around long-term hematologic and renal safety, radionuclide supply, protocol standardization, and global accessibility. Ongoing and future multicenter trials, collaborative consortia, and innovations in theranostics will be critical to defining optimal patient selection, sequencing with existing therapies, and embedding RLT as a key pillar in the management of advanced PCa.</p>","PeriodicalId":23053,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","volume":"18 ","pages":"17588359251409047"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12796145/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145971192","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-09eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1177/17588359251411133
Tugay Avci, Ahmet Anil Altunbas, Mustafa Sahbazlar, Ferhat Ekinci, Atike Pinar Erdogan
Background: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors have become a cornerstone in the treatment of HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer. While their efficacy is well-established, emerging reports of nephrotoxicity warrant further investigation into its incidence, risk factors, and potential impact on survival outcomes.
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for nephrotoxicity in patients receiving CDK4/6 inhibitors (palbociclib or ribociclib) and to analyze its association with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
Design: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study.
Methods: We reviewed the medical records of 120 patients with advanced breast cancer treated with palbociclib or ribociclib between October 2018 and July 2024. Nephrotoxicity was defined as a ⩾20% decline in creatinine clearance (CKD-EPI 2021) from baseline. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, t-tests, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and Cox regression models.
Results: Nephrotoxicity occurred in 28 patients (23.3%). Older age (⩾65 years) and higher baseline urea and creatinine levels were significant risk factors (p < 0.001). Paradoxically, patients who developed nephrotoxicity showed a trend toward better survival outcomes: median PFS was 30 months versus 20 months (p = 0.188), and the 3-year OS rate was 77.9% versus 63.8% (p = 0.801), though these differences were not statistically significant. In multivariate Cox analysis, the development of nephrotoxicity showed a trend toward a 71% reduction in mortality risk (HR = 0.293, p = 0.078), but it was not statistically significant.
Conclusion: Nephrotoxicity is relatively common in patients treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors, particularly in older individuals and those with elevated baseline renal parameters. Contrary to conventional expectations, its occurrence may be associated with a trend toward improved survival, possibly reflecting higher drug exposure or effective target inhibition. These findings highlight the need for careful renal monitoring and suggest that nephrotoxicity could serve as a potential surrogate marker for treatment efficacy, warranting validation in larger prospective studies.
背景:细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6 (CDK4/6)抑制剂已成为治疗HR+/HER2-晚期乳腺癌的基石。虽然它们的疗效是公认的,但新出现的肾毒性报告需要进一步调查其发生率、风险因素和对生存结果的潜在影响。目的:本研究旨在评估接受CDK4/6抑制剂(palbociclib或ribociclib)的患者肾毒性的发生率和危险因素,并分析其与无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)的关系。设计:这是一项单中心、回顾性队列研究。方法:回顾2018年10月至2024年7月期间120例接受帕博西尼或核糖西尼治疗的晚期乳腺癌患者的病历。肾毒性被定义为肌酐清除率(CKD-EPI 2021)从基线下降小于或等于20%。统计分析包括描述性统计、卡方检验、t检验、Kaplan-Meier生存分析和Cox回归模型。结果:发生肾毒性28例(23.3%)。年龄较大(大于或等于65岁)和较高的基线尿素和肌酐水平是显著的危险因素(p p = 0.188), 3年OS率为77.9%对63.8% (p = 0.801),尽管这些差异在统计学上不显著。多因素Cox分析显示,肾毒性的发生有降低死亡风险71%的趋势(HR = 0.293, p = 0.078),但无统计学意义。结论:肾毒性在接受CDK4/6抑制剂治疗的患者中相对常见,特别是在老年人和基线肾参数升高的患者中。与传统预期相反,它的发生可能与生存率提高的趋势有关,可能反映了更高的药物暴露或有效的靶标抑制。这些发现强调了对肾脏进行仔细监测的必要性,并表明肾毒性可以作为治疗疗效的潜在替代标志物,值得在更大规模的前瞻性研究中进行验证。
{"title":"Nephrotoxicity secondary to CDK 4/6 inhibitors in advanced breast cancer patients and its impact on survival.","authors":"Tugay Avci, Ahmet Anil Altunbas, Mustafa Sahbazlar, Ferhat Ekinci, Atike Pinar Erdogan","doi":"10.1177/17588359251411133","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17588359251411133","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors have become a cornerstone in the treatment of HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer. While their efficacy is well-established, emerging reports of nephrotoxicity warrant further investigation into its incidence, risk factors, and potential impact on survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for nephrotoxicity in patients receiving CDK4/6 inhibitors (palbociclib or ribociclib) and to analyze its association with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed the medical records of 120 patients with advanced breast cancer treated with palbociclib or ribociclib between October 2018 and July 2024. Nephrotoxicity was defined as a ⩾20% decline in creatinine clearance (CKD-EPI 2021) from baseline. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, t-tests, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and Cox regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nephrotoxicity occurred in 28 patients (23.3%). Older age (⩾65 years) and higher baseline urea and creatinine levels were significant risk factors (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Paradoxically, patients who developed nephrotoxicity showed a trend toward better survival outcomes: median PFS was 30 months versus 20 months (<i>p</i> = 0.188), and the 3-year OS rate was 77.9% versus 63.8% (<i>p</i> = 0.801), though these differences were not statistically significant. In multivariate Cox analysis, the development of nephrotoxicity showed a trend toward a 71% reduction in mortality risk (HR = 0.293, <i>p</i> = 0.078), but it was not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nephrotoxicity is relatively common in patients treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors, particularly in older individuals and those with elevated baseline renal parameters. Contrary to conventional expectations, its occurrence may be associated with a trend toward improved survival, possibly reflecting higher drug exposure or effective target inhibition. These findings highlight the need for careful renal monitoring and suggest that nephrotoxicity could serve as a potential surrogate marker for treatment efficacy, warranting validation in larger prospective studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23053,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","volume":"18 ","pages":"17588359251411133"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12789390/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145953053","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}