Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology最新文献

Background: Approximately half of the patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) receive subsequent lines of chemotherapy. Recently, the liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) regimen is recommended as subsequent lines of chemotherapy. However, little is known about the predictive factors for the nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV regimen, especially in patients with previous irinotecan (IRI) exposure.

Objectives: We investigated the predictive factors associated with nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV treatment in patients with PDAC.

Design: Multicenter, retrospective cohort study.

Methods: This study included patients with advanced PDAC who received the nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV regimen for palliative purposes.

Results: Overall, 268 patients were treated with nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV. The median overall survival (OS) was 7.9 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 7.0-8.8), while the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.6 months (95% CI: 1.9-3.2). An albumin level of<4.0 g/dL, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) of ⩾3.5, liver or peritoneal metastasis, and a history of >3 lines of palliative chemotherapy were associated with worse OS. An NLR of ⩾3.5 and liver metastasis were significant predictive factors for worse PFS. Previous exposure to IRI was not a significant predictor. Patients without prior IRI (no-IRI) treatment showed relatively longer OS and PFS compared to IRI responders and nonresponders, but these differences were not significant when compared specifically to the responders (OS: 8.8 vs 8.1 months, p = 0.388; PFS: 3.6 vs 2.6 months, p = 0.126).

Conclusion: An NLR of ⩾3.5 and liver metastasis were associated with worse PFS. Prior IRI exposure was not a significant predictive factor for OS and PFS, especially in IRI responders.

Cervical cancer (CC) is still characterized by a poor prognosis despite the progress made in its treatment in recent years. Although immunotherapy has improved outcomes for advanced/recurrent disease, there is a significant gap in addressing patients' needs when they progress after platinum and immunotherapy treatments. In this setting, traditional chemotherapy showed limited effectiveness. In this context, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) emerged as a promising tool within targeted cancer therapies. Tisotumab vedotin (TV), an ADC targeting tissue factor, represents the first ADC approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of recurrent or metastatic CC with disease progression on or after chemotherapy. In phase I-III published trials, TV has already demonstrated an advantage in terms of objective response rate (17.8%-54.4%) and progression-free survival (3.1-6.9 months) in patients who progressed to the first-line standard therapy. Data concerning the addition of TV to platinum/pembrolizumab first-line chemotherapy are still under analysis and strongly expected. However, several questions are still unresolved: (1) the identification of the most suitable timing for ADCs administration in the treatment sequence of advanced/recurrent CC; (2) the evaluation of combination therapies as a tool to minimize the emergence of resistant clones and to enhance overall effectiveness; and (3) the assessment of tolerability and correct management of special toxicities (e.g. ocular and neurological adverse events). In the near future, an improvement in patient selection via biomarker-driven strategies should be crucial for optimizing both treatment benefits and maintaining an acceptable toxicity profile.

Background and objectives: Second-line treatment for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is primarily guided by the time elapsed since the last platinum dose. Rechallenge with carboplatin and etoposide has demonstrated superior outcomes compared to topotecan if the platinum-free interval (PFI) is longer than 90 days and is considered the standard of care. However, these findings predate the chemo-immunotherapy era. This study investigates the effectiveness of the rechallenge strategy after chemo-immunotherapy in a real-world setting.

Design and methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with the extensive stage (ES)-SCLC who received rechallenge with carboplatin and etoposide after first-line chemoimmunotherapy between September 2020 and August 2023 in nine European centres. Demographic and clinical data were collected and analysed.

Results: A total of 93 patients were included. Sixty-six (71%) patients had a PFI between 3 and 6 months. Consolidation thoracic radiotherapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation had been administered in 31 (33.3%) patients and 20 (21.5%) patients, respectively. Overall response rate was 59.1%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 4.3-5.7) and median overall survival (OS) was 7 months (95% CI 5.7-8.3). Notably, PFS and OS were not different according to PFI (3-6 m vs > 6 m).

Conclusion: Rechallenge with carboplatin and etoposide is a valid second-line option in patients with ES-SCLC whose disease progresses after first-line chemoimmunotherapy. Our analysis shows similar results to previous studies. Furthermore, outcomes were consistent across patients with different PFIs, confirming its efficacy in patients with a PFI longer than 3 months.

Background: The HIMALAYA trial found that durvalumab plus tremelimumab significantly prolonged progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) compared with sorafenib.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of durvalumab plus tremelimumab compared with sorafenib in the first-line HCC setting.

Design: A Markov model-based cost-effectiveness analysis.

Methods: We created a Markov model to compare healthcare costs and clinical outcomes of HCC patients treated with durvalumab plus tremelimumab in the first-line setting compared with sorafenib. We estimated transition probabilities from randomized trials. Lifetime direct healthcare costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated for first-line durvalumab plus tremelimumab compared with sorafenib from a US payer's perspective.

Results: In the base case, first-line durvalumab plus tremelimumab was associated with an improvement of 0.29 QALYs compared with sorafenib. While both treatment strategies were associated with considerable lifetime expenditures, first-line durvalumab plus tremelimumab was less expensive than sorafenib ($188,405 vs $218,584). The incremental net monetary benefit for durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus sorafenib was $72,762 (valuing QALYs at $150,000 each). The results of durvalumab plus tremelimumab were better in terms of costs and health outcomes in patients with HBV-related HCC and high alpha-fetoprotein levels.

Conclusion: First-line durvalumab plus tremelimumab was estimated to be dominant for the treatment of unresectable HCC compared with sorafenib from a US payer's perspective.

Malignant PEComas are an extremely rare subtype of soft tissue sarcomas. Here, we report the case of a man presenting with a perirectal PEComa and liver metastasis. Since the tumor harbored a tumor mutational burden of 23/Mb and a programmed death-ligand 1 tumor positivity score of 50%, the patient was treated with pembrolizumab as a second line of systemic therapy, in combination with everolimus. This combined therapy led to a near-complete response of the primary tumor and a partial response of the metastasis. Radioembolization of the liver metastasis was performed due to isolated liver progression, and the pelvic tumor was treated by radiotherapy because of pelvic symptoms. The disease is still stable after 13 months of pembrolizumab plus everolimus and multimodal treatment. This case shows that malignant PEComas can display molecular features associated with sensitivity to checkpoint inhibitors. The use of checkpoint inhibitors may be a relevant therapeutic strategy in these patients. It is also the first report on selective internal radiation therapy in PEComas.

Background: Genetic studies of ovarian cancer (OC) have historically focused on BRCA1/2 mutations, lacking other studies of homologous recombination repair (HRR). Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) exploit synthetic lethality to significantly improve OC treatment outcomes, especially in BRCA1/2 deficiency patients.

Objectives: Our study aims to construct a mutation map of HRR genes in OC and identify factors influencing the efficacy of PARPi.

Design: A retrospective observational analysis of HRR gene variation data from 695 OC patients from March 2019 to February 2022 was performed.

Methods: The HRR gene variation data of 695 OC patients who underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS) in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University were retrospectively collected. Clinical data on the use of PARPi in these patients were also gathered to identify factors that may interfere with the efficacy of PARPi.

Results: Out of 127 pathogenic variants in the BRCA1/2 genes, 104 (81.9%) were BRCA1 mutations, and 23 (18.1%) were BRCA2 mutations. Among the 59 variants of uncertain significance (VUS), 20 (33.9%) were BRCA1, while 39 (66.1%) were BRCA2 mutations. In addition to BRCA1/2, HRR gene results showed that 9 (69%) of 13 were HRR pathway pathogenic variants; and 16 (1.7%) of 116 VUS were Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved mutated HRR genes. Notably, the treatment regimen significantly influenced the effectiveness of PARPi, especially when using first-line maintenance therapy, leading to enhanced progression-free survival (PFS) compared to alternative protocols.

Conclusion: Focusing on HRR gene mutations and supporting clinical research about PARPi in OC patients is crucial for developing precision treatment strategies and enhancing prognosis.