Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology最新文献

Background: Previous studies reported higher incidences of venous thromboembolism and cardiovascular disease in schizophrenia patients and higher indicators of thrombosis, thrombocyte activation, and platelet dysfunction.

Objectives: To check if first-episode schizophrenia (FES) patients have a hypercoagulable state and determine whether acute and chronic antipsychotics have the same effect on blood coagulation or fibrinolysis-related biomarkers.

Design: Case-control study.

Methods: A total of 81 participants were grouped in FES, chronic schizophrenia (CS), and healthy controls (HCs). In addition to demographic data and clinical characteristics, immunological analyses were performed to measure plasma levels of D-dimer, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), soluble P selectin (sP-sel), tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), thrombotic precursor protein (TpP), and von Willebrand's disease factor (vWF).

Results: Compared to HC group, FES patients showed higher PAI-1 (28.61 ng/ml versus 15.69 ng/ml), sP-sel (2.78 ng/ml versus 1.18 ng/ml), and TpP (15.61 µg/ml versus 5.59 µg/ml) along with a higher PAI-1/tPA (3.12 versus 2.00). Acute antipsychotic medication reduced higher PAI-1 (28.61 → 21.99), sP-sel (2.78 → 1.87), tPA (9.59 → 5.83), TpP (15.61 → 10.54), and vWF (383.18 → 291.08) in FES patients. However, plasma sP-sel and vWF in CS patients returned to the pre-treatment levels in FES patients, and PAI-1/tPA significantly decreased compared to FES patients.

Conclusion: These results suggest a hypercoagulable state in FES patients and demonstrate contrast effects of acute and chronic antipsychotics on coagulation or fibrinolysis in schizophrenia patients.

Background: The therapeutic potential of subanesthetic doses of ketamine appears promising in unipolar depression; however, its effectiveness in treating bipolar depression (BD) remains uncertain.

Objective: This systematic review aimed to summarize findings on the use of ketamine for the treatment of BD by assessing its efficacy, safety, and tolerability.

Design: Systematic review.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review of studies that investigated the use of ketamine for adults with BD. We searched PubMed and Embase for relevant randomized-controlled trials, open-label trials, and retrospective chart analyses published from inception to 13 March 2023.

Results: Eight studies were identified [pooled n = 235; mean (SD) age: 45.55 (5.54)]. All participants who received intravenous (IV) ketamine were administered a dose of 0.5-0.75 mg/kg as an adjunctive treatment to a mood-stabilizing agent, whereas participants who received esketamine were administered a dosage ranging from 28 to 84 mg. Flexible dosing was used in real-world analyses. A total of 48% of participants receiving ketamine achieved a response (defined as ⩾50% reduction in baseline depression severity), whereas only 5% achieved a response with a placebo. Real-world studies demonstrated lower rates of response (30%) compared to the average across clinical trials (63%). Reductions in suicidal ideation were noted in some studies, although not all findings were statistically significant. Ketamine and esketamine were well tolerated in most participants; however, six participants (2% of the overall sample pool, 5 receiving ketamine) developed hypomanic/manic symptoms after infusions. Significant dissociative symptoms were observed at the 40-min mark in some trials.

Conclusion: Preliminary evidence suggests IV ketamine as being safe and effective for the treatment of BD. Future studies should focus on investigating the effects of repeated acute and maintenance infusions using a randomized study design.

Research in the last decade has expressed considerable optimism about the clinical potential of psychedelics for the treatment of mental disorders. This optimism is reflected in an increase in research papers, investments by pharmaceutical companies, patents, media coverage, as well as political and legislative changes. However, psychedelic science is facing serious challenges that threaten the validity of core findings and raise doubt regarding clinical efficacy and safety. In this paper, we introduce the 10 most pressing challenges, grouped into easy, moderate, and hard problems. We show how these problems threaten internal validity (treatment effects are due to factors unrelated to the treatment), external validity (lack of generalizability), construct validity (unclear working mechanism), or statistical conclusion validity (conclusions do not follow from the data and methods). These problems tend to co-occur in psychedelic studies, limiting conclusions that can be drawn about the safety and efficacy of psychedelic therapy. We provide a roadmap for tackling these challenges and share a checklist that researchers, journalists, funders, policymakers, and other stakeholders can use to assess the quality of psychedelic science. Addressing today's problems is necessary to find out whether the optimism regarding the therapeutic potential of psychedelics has been warranted and to avoid history repeating itself.

Aging increases susceptibility both to psychiatric and medical disorders through a variety of processes ranging from biochemical to pharmacologic to societal. Interactions between aging-related brain changes, emotional and psychological symptoms, and social factors contribute to multimorbidity - the presence of two or more chronic conditions in an individual - which requires a more patient-centered, holistic approach than used in traditional single-disease treatment guidelines. Optimal treatment of older adults with psychiatric and medical multimorbidity necessitates an appreciation and understanding of the links between biological, psychological, and social factors - including trauma and racism - that underlie physical and psychiatric multimorbidity in older adults, all of which are the topic of this review.

Metformin is the currently accepted first-line treatment for antipsychotic-associated weight gain (AAWG). However, not all patients benefit from metformin. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) have shown promise in the management of obesity in the general population, with preliminary evidence supporting efficacy in AAWG. Semaglutide is a weekly injectable GLP-1RA which received recent approval for obesity management and noted superiority over other GLP-1RAs. This study explored the efficacy and tolerability of semaglutide in AAWG among individuals with severe mental illness. A retrospective chart review of patients treated with semaglutide in the Metabolic Clinic at the Center for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) between 2019 and 2021 was conducted. Patients failing a trial of metformin (<5% weight loss or continuing to meet criteria for metabolic syndrome) after 3 months at the maximum tolerated dose (1500-2000 mg/day) were initiated on semaglutide up to 2 mg/week. The primary outcome measure was a change in weight at 3, 6, and 12 months. Twelve patients on weekly semaglutide injections of 0.71 ± 0.47 mg/week were included in the analysis. About 50% were female; the average age was 36.09 ± 13.32 years. At baseline, mean weight was 111.4 ± 31.7 kg, BMI was 36.7 ± 8.2 kg/m², with a mean waist circumference of 118.1 ± 19.3 cm. A weight loss of 4.56 ± 3.15 kg (p < 0.001), 5.16 ± 6.27 kg (p = 0.04) and 8.67 ± 9 kg (p = 0.04) was seen at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively, after initiation of semaglutide with relatively well-tolerated side-effects. Initial evidence from our real-world clinical setting suggests that semaglutide may be effective in reducing AAWG in patients not responding to metformin. Randomized control trials investigating semaglutide for AAWG are needed to corroborate these findings.

Despite its enduring relevance as the single most effective and important evidence-based treatment for schizophrenia, underutilization of clozapine remains considerable. To a substantial degree, this is attributable to a reluctance of psychiatrists to offer clozapine due to its relatively large side-effect burden and the complexity of its use. This underscores the necessity for continued education regarding both the vital nature and the intricacies of clozapine treatment. This narrative review summarizes all clinically relevant areas of evidence, which support clozapine's wide-ranging superior efficacy - for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) and beyond - and make its safe use eminently feasible. Converging evidence indicates that TRS constitutes a distinct albeit heterogeneous subgroup of schizophrenias primarily responsive to clozapine. Most importantly, the predominantly early onset of treatment resistance and the considerable decline in response rates associated with its delayed initiation make clozapine an essential treatment option throughout the course of illness, beginning with the first psychotic episode. To maximize patients' benefits, systematic early recognition efforts based on stringent use of TRS criteria, a timely offer of clozapine, thorough side-effect screening and management as well as consistent use of therapeutic drug monitoring and established augmentation strategies for suboptimal responders are crucial. To minimize permanent all-cause discontinuation, re-challenges after neutropenia or myocarditis should be considered. Owing to clozapine's unique efficacy, comorbid conditions including substance use and most somatic disorders should not dissuade but rather encourage clinicians to consider clozapine. Moreover, treatment decisions need to be informed by the late onset of clozapine's full effects, which for reduced suicidality and mortality rates may not even be readily apparent. Overall, the singular extent of its efficacy combined with the high level of patient satisfaction continues to distinguish clozapine from all other available antipsychotics.

Introduction: Benzodiazepine tapering and cessation has been associated with diverse symptom constellations of varying duration. Although described in the literature decades ago, the mechanistic underpinnings of enduring symptoms that can last months or years have not yet been elucidated.

Objective: This secondary analysis of the results from an Internet survey sought to better understand the acute and protracted withdrawal symptoms associated with benzodiazepine use and discontinuation.

Methods: An online survey (n = 1207) was used to gather information about benzodiazepine use, including withdrawal syndrome and protracted symptoms.

Results: The mean number of withdrawal symptoms reported by a respondent in this survey was 15 out of 23 symptoms. Six percent of respondents reported having all 23 listed symptoms. A cluster of least-frequently reported symptoms (whole-body trembling, hallucinations, seizures) were also the symptoms most frequently reported as lasting only days or weeks, that is, short-duration symptoms. Symptoms of nervousness/anxiety/fear, sleep disturbances, low energy, and difficulty focusing/distractedness were experienced by the majority of respondents (⩾85%) and, along with memory loss, were the symptoms of longest duration. Prolonged symptoms of anxiety and insomnia occurred in many who have discontinued benzodiazepines, including over 50% who were not originally prescribed benzodiazepines for that indication. It remains unclear if these symptoms might be caused by neuroadaptive and/or neurotoxic changes induced by benzodiazepine exposure. In this way, benzodiazepine withdrawal may have acute and long-term symptoms attributable to different underlying mechanisms, which is the case with alcohol withdrawal.

Conclusions: These findings tentatively support the notion that symptoms which are acute but transient during benzodiazepine tapering and discontinuation may be distinct in their nature and duration from the enduring symptoms experienced by many benzodiazepine users.

Background: In patients attempting to discontinue their antidepressant medication, there have been no prospective studies on patterns of withdrawal as a function of the rate of antidepressant reduction during the tapering trajectory, and moderators thereof.

Objective: To investigate withdrawal as a function of gradual dose reduction.

Design: Prospective cohort study.

Methods: The sampling frame consisted of 3956 individuals in the Netherlands who received an antidepressant tapering strip between 19 May 2019 and 22 March 2022 in routine clinical practice. Of these, 608 patients, majorly with previous unsuccessful attempts to stop, provided daily ratings of withdrawal in the context of reducing their antidepressant medications (mostly venlafaxine or paroxetine), using hyperbolic tapering strips offering daily tiny reductions in dose.

Results: Withdrawal in daily-step hyperbolic tapering trajectories was limited, and inverse to the rate of taper. Female sex, younger age, presence of one or more risk factors and faster rate of reduction over shorter tapering trajectories were associated with more withdrawal and differential course over time. Thus, sex and age differences were less marked early in the course of the trajectory, whereas differences associated with risk factors and shorter trajectories tended to peak early in the trajectory. There was evidence that tapering in weekly larger steps (mean per-week dose reduction: 33.4% of previous dose), in comparison with daily tiny steps (mean per-day dose reduction: 4.5% of previous dose or 25.3% per week), was associated with more withdrawal in trajectories of 1, 2 or 3 months, particularly for paroxetine and the group of other (non-paroxetine, non-venlafaxine) antidepressants.

Conclusion: Antidepressant hyperbolic tapering is associated with limited, rate-dependent withdrawal that is inverse to the rate of taper. The demonstration of multiple demographic, risk and complex temporal moderators in time series of withdrawal data indicates that antidepressant tapering in clinical practice requires a personalised process of shared decision making over the entire course of the tapering period.

Background: More than 2% of the general population experience suicidal ideas each year and a large number of them will attempt suicide. Evidence-based therapeutic options to manage suicidal crisis are currently limited.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to overview the findings on the use of ketamine and esketamine for the treatment of suicidal ideas and acts.

Design: Systematic review.

Data sources and methods: PubMed, article references, and Clinicaltrials.gov up to June 30, 2022. Meta-analyses published within the last 2 years were also reviewed.

Results: We identified 12 randomized controlled trials with reduction of suicidal ideation as the primary objective and 14 trials as secondary objectives. Intravenous racemic ketamine was superior to control drugs (placebo or midazolam) within the first 72 h, in spite of large placebo effects. Adverse events were minor and transient. In contrast, intranasal esketamine did not differ from placebo in large-scale studies. Limitations, clinical considerations, and opportunities for future research include the following points: large placebo effects when studying suicidal ideation reduction; small concerns about blinding quality due to dissociative effects; no studies on the risk/prevention of suicidal acts and mortality; lack of studies beyond affective disorders; no studies in adolescents and older people; lack of knowledge of long-term side effects, notably liability for abuse; no robust predictive markers; limited understanding of the mechanisms of ketamine on suicidal ideas; need for improved assessment of suicidal ideation in clinical trials; need for studies in outpatient settings, emergency room, and liaison consultation; need for research on ketamine administration; limited knowledge on the positive and negative effects of concomitant treatments.

Conclusion: Overall, there is compelling evidence for a favorable short-term benefit-risk balance with intravenous racemic ketamine but not intranasal esketamine. The place of ketamine will have to be defined within a multimodal care strategy for suicidal patients. Caution remains necessary for clinical use, and pharmacovigilance will be essential.