Background: Multiple myeloma is currently the leading indication for autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT). A prerequisite for AHCT is mobilization and collection of adequate blood graft to support high-dose therapy. Current mobilization strategies include granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone or in combination with chemotherapy most commonly cyclophosphamide (CY). More recently, plerixafor has become into agenda especially in patients who mobilize poorly. In the selection of a mobilization method, several factors should be considered.
Summary: Preplanned collection target is important as G-CSF plus plerixafor is more effective in the mobilization of CD34+ cells than G-CSF alone. On the other hand, CY plus G-CSF is superior to G-CSF only mobilization. Previous therapy and age of the patients are important considerations as G-CSF alone may not be effective enough in patients with risk factors for poor mobilization. These factors include extensive lenalidomide exposure, irradiation to bone marrow-bearing sites, higher age, or a previous mobilization failure. Also, local preferences and experiences as well as the number of apheresis needed are important issues as well as cost-effectiveness considerations. Mobilization method used may have implication for cellular composition of collected grafts, which might have an impact on posttransplant events such as hematologic and immune recovery in addition to also potential long-term outcomes.
Key message: Currently, G-CSF alone and preemptive plerixafor if needed might be considered as a standard mobilization strategy in MM patients intended for AHCT.
Backgound: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a standard treatment in transplant-eligible mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patients after first-line chemoimmunotherapy.
Study design and methods: This prospective multicenter study evaluated the impact of CD34+ cell mobilization and graft cellular composition analyzed by flow cytometry on hematologic recovery and outcome in 42 MCL patients.
Results: During CD34+ cell mobilization, a higher blood CD34+ cell count (>30 × 106/L) was associated with improved overall survival (median not reached [NR] vs. 57 months, p = 0.04). The use of plerixafor did not impact outcome. Higher number of viable cryopreserved graft CD34+ cells (>3.0 × 106/kg) was associated with faster platelet (median 11 vs. 15 days, p = 0.03) and neutrophil (median 9 vs. 10 days, p = 0.02) recovery posttransplant. Very low graft CD3+CD8+ cell count (≤10 × 106/kg) correlated with worse progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 4.136, 95% CI 1.547-11.059, p = 0.005). On the other hand, higher absolute lymphocyte count >2.5 × 109/L at 30 days after ASCT (ALC-30) was linked with better PFS (median NR vs. 99 months, p = 0.045) and overall survival (median NR in either group, p = 0.05).
Conclusions: Better mobilization capacity and higher graft CD3+CD8+ cell count had a positive prognostic impact in this study, in addition to earlier lymphocyte recovery (ALC-30>2.5 × 106/L). These results need to be validated in another study with a larger patient cohort.
Background: Peripartum haemorrhage (PPH) is a potentially life-threatening complication. Although still rare, the incidence of peripartal haemorrhage is rising in industrialised countries and refractory bleeding remains among the leading causes of death in the peripartal period.
Summary: The interdisciplinary German, Austrian, and Swiss guideline on "Peripartum Haemorrhage: Diagnostics and Therapies" has reviewed the evidence for the diagnostics and medical, angiographic, haemostatic, and surgical treatment and published an update in September 2022 . This article reviews the updated recommendations regarding the early diagnosis and haemostatic treatment of PPH. Keystones of the guideline recommendations are the early diagnosis of the bleeding by measuring blood loss using calibrated collector bags, the development of a multidisciplinary treatment algorithm adapted to the severity of bleeding, and the given infrastructural conditions of each obstetric unit, the early and escalating use of uterotonics, the therapeutic, instead of preventative, use of tranexamic acid, the early diagnostics of progressive deficiencies of coagulation factors or platelets to facilitate a tailored and guided haemostatic treatment with coagulation factors, platelets as well as packed red blood cells and fresh frozen plasma when a massive transfusion is required.
Key messages: Essential for the effective and safe treatment of PPH is the timely diagnosis. The diagnosis of PPH requires the measurement rather than estimation of blood loss. Successful treatment of PPH consists of a multidisciplinary approach involving surgical and haemostatic treatments to stop the bleeding. Haemostatic treatment of PPH starts early after diagnosis and combines tranexamic acid, an initially ratio-driven transfusion with RBC:plasma:PC = 4:4:1 (when using pooled or apheresis PC) and finally a goal-directed substitution with coagulation factor concentrates for proven deficiencies. Early monitoring of coagulation either by standard parameters or viscoelastic methods facilitates goal-directed haemostatic treatment.