Translational lung cancer research最新文献

Background: Tracheo-carinal resection and reconstruction in cases of extensive malignant tumors present a significant surgical challenge, often complicated by high anastomotic tension and potential for incomplete anastomosis.

Case description: We report on a 45-year-old male with a primary adenoid cystic carcinoma. The tumor was about 3 cm in size and invaded about 1 cm of the lower trachea, 2 cm of the left main bronchus (LMB), and 1 cm of the right main bronchus (RMB), blocking about 70% of the tracheal lumen, 90% of the LMB, and 50% of the RMB. Resection of the lower trachea and part of the LMB and RMB was performed via the right chest. We used the right main bronchial flap as a bridge, suturing it separately to the lower tracheal segment and the LMB, thereby completing the carinal reconstruction. This technique was crucial for bridging the defect between the trachea and LMB, which was impossible to anastomose directly due to the tumor's extensive involvement. The elliptical-shaped lingual flap from the RMB provided a stable and tension-free foundation for the reconstruction, overcoming the limitations of conventional methods.

Conclusions: The novel carinal reconstruction technique demonstrated a reliable alternative for complex tracheo-carinal defects, ensuring tension-free anastomosis and complete tumor resection with clear margins.

Background: Pembrolizumab 400 mg every six weeks (Q6W) and nivolumab 480 mg every four weeks (Q4W) are used since 2020 and the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This recommendation relied on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models. The objective of the IDEE (Immunothérapie Double dose Etendue: Experience bretonne) study is to determine the safety and efficacy of this treatment regimen in real life conditions.

Methods: We conducted an observational, retrospective, multicentric study including 117 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received pembrolizumab Q6W or nivolumab Q4W between March 2020 and March 2021.

Results: The median age was 67 years, 68% were men with predominantly lung adenocarcinoma. The median time to double-dose regimen failure (TDDF) was 9.2 months. The survival rate at 12 months was 79%. TDDF was not influenced by sex, line of treatment, pathologic subtypes or anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody. There was no correlation between TDDF and duration of prior exposition to immunotherapy before switching. Sixty-eight patients experienced double-dose treatment failure, 28% because of toxicity including five definitive discontinuations. Five grade ≥3 immune-adverse events were reported included two cases of pneumonitis, all responding to corticosteroid therapy.

Conclusions: Our multicentric cohort supports the feasibility of pembrolizumab Q6W and nivolumab Q4W for patients with advanced NSCLC. There is no warning signal regarding safety neither efficacy in our real-life data.

Background: The suitability of sublobar resection as a surgical approach for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear. This study investigated the feasibility of sublobar resection in patients with pathological-stage IA adenocarcinoma less than 2 cm characterized by a high-risk pathological subtype but exhibiting radiologically noninvasive features.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients diagnosed with pathological stage IA lung adenocarcinoma who underwent surgical intervention between 2013 and 2017. The inclusion criteria included a maximum tumor diameter of 2.0 cm or less, a consolidation-to-tumor ratio (CTR) of 0.25 or less, and a histopathological confirmation of a solid or micropapillary component. Patients were categorized into sublobar resection and lobectomy groups, and propensity score matching was employed to mitigate potential confounders. The primary endpoints were lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) and overall survival (OS).

Results: The study comprised 149 patients, with 84 in the lobectomy group and 65 in the limited resection group. In the overall cohort, the 5-year LCSS was 100% for both groups, while the 5-year OS was 97.6% (95% CI: 94.41-100.00%) in the lobectomy group and 100% in the sublobar resection group (P=0.21). After propensity score matching, the LCSS remained at 100% for both groups, and the 5-year OS was 97.14% in the lobectomy group and 100% in the sublobar resection group (P=0.32).

Conclusions: Based on our experience, for lung adenocarcinoma containing solid/micropapillary subtype, a size less than 2 cm, and a CTR ≤0.25, the oncological outcomes appeared to be comparable between sublobar resection and lobectomy, suggesting that sublobar resection might serve as an equivalent alternative to lobectomy for such lesions.