Yu-Bin Seo, Jae Hoon Kim, Ji Hye Song, WonTae Jung, Kyu-Yeol Nam, Nyung Kim, Youn-Woong Choi, SangMin Cho, Do-Hyung Ki, Hye Jung Lee, JungHa Moon, SeungSeob Lee, JaeHee Kim, Jang Hee Hong, Jung Sunwoo, Jin-Gyu Jung
This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety profiles of 2 fenofibric acid formulations under fasting and fed conditions. The reference was a 135 mg capsule, while the test was a 110 mg enteric-coated tablet. This randomized, open-label, two-sequence, two-period crossover phase 1 clinical trial was conducted in healthy Korean men. Sixty participants were enrolled in each of the fasting and feeding groups. Blood samples were collected 72 hours after drug administration. PK parameters were calculated using a non-compartmental method with Phoenix WinNonlin®. A total of 53 and 51 participants from the fasting and feeding groups, respectively, completed the study. The geometric mean ratio and 90% confidence intervals of the maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve to the last measurable plasma concentration were 0.9195 (0.8795-0.9614) and 0.8630 (0.8472-0.8791) in the fasting study and 1.0926 (1.0102-1.1818) and 0.9998 (0.9675-1.0332) in the fed study, respectively. The time to reach Cmax of the enteric-coated tablet compared to that of the capsule was extended by 1 and 3 hours under fasting and fed conditions, respectively. In conclusion, enteric-coated tablets have a higher bioavailability than capsules. In addition, the enteric-coated tablet was smaller than the capsule, making it easier for patients to swallow.
Trial registration: Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0007177, KCT0003304.
{"title":"Safety and pharmacokinetic comparison between fenofibric acid 135 mg capsule and 110 mg enteric-coated tablet in healthy volunteers.","authors":"Yu-Bin Seo, Jae Hoon Kim, Ji Hye Song, WonTae Jung, Kyu-Yeol Nam, Nyung Kim, Youn-Woong Choi, SangMin Cho, Do-Hyung Ki, Hye Jung Lee, JungHa Moon, SeungSeob Lee, JaeHee Kim, Jang Hee Hong, Jung Sunwoo, Jin-Gyu Jung","doi":"10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety profiles of 2 fenofibric acid formulations under fasting and fed conditions. The reference was a 135 mg capsule, while the test was a 110 mg enteric-coated tablet. This randomized, open-label, two-sequence, two-period crossover phase 1 clinical trial was conducted in healthy Korean men. Sixty participants were enrolled in each of the fasting and feeding groups. Blood samples were collected 72 hours after drug administration. PK parameters were calculated using a non-compartmental method with Phoenix WinNonlin<sup>®</sup>. A total of 53 and 51 participants from the fasting and feeding groups, respectively, completed the study. The geometric mean ratio and 90% confidence intervals of the maximum concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) and area under the concentration-time curve to the last measurable plasma concentration were 0.9195 (0.8795-0.9614) and 0.8630 (0.8472-0.8791) in the fasting study and 1.0926 (1.0102-1.1818) and 0.9998 (0.9675-1.0332) in the fed study, respectively. The time to reach C<sub>max</sub> of the enteric-coated tablet compared to that of the capsule was extended by 1 and 3 hours under fasting and fed conditions, respectively. In conclusion, enteric-coated tablets have a higher bioavailability than capsules. In addition, the enteric-coated tablet was smaller than the capsule, making it easier for patients to swallow.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0007177, KCT0003304.</p>","PeriodicalId":23288,"journal":{"name":"Translational and Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"31 2","pages":"95-104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5c/ea/tcp-31-95.PMC10333648.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10192784","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-01DOI: 10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e10
Hae Won Lee, Woo Youl Kang, Ji Seo Park, Jae Hwa Lee, Mi-Ri Gwon, Dong Heon Yang, Eun Hee Kim, Soo-Jin Park, Young-Ran Yoon, Sook Jin Seong
Two open-label, randomized, two-period crossover studies were conducted to investigate the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties, safety, and bioequivalence of the test formulation (KD4004), a new fixed-dose combination (FDC) formulation of dapagliflozin and metformin extended release (XR) tablets, relative to the reference formulation (10 mg dapagliflozin/1,000 mg metformin XR FDC tablet) in healthy subjects under fasting (Part A) and fed (Part B) conditions. After giving the dose, serial blood samples were collected for a period of 48 hours. Primary PK parameters (AUC0-t and Cmax) were used to assess bioequivalence between two dapagliflozin/metformin XR (10/1,000 mg) FDC formulations under fed and fasting conditions. Safety and tolerability were also evaluated. Part A and Part B were completed by 32 and 37 subjects, respectively. Bioequivalence of the two FDC formulations of dapagliflozin and metformin XR tablets was established in both the fasted and the fed conditions as the 90% confidence interval of the ratios of adjusted geometric means for AUC0-t and Cmax were contained within the predefined range of 0.800-1.250 bioequivalence criteria. Single-dose administration of dapagliflozin and metformin XR was safe and well tolerated as the two FDC formulations. In conclusion, both FDC formulations of dapagliflozin and metformin XR tablets were bioequivalent in fed and fasted subjects. All treatments were well tolerated.
Trial registration: Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0004026.
{"title":"Fed and fasted bioequivalence assessment of two formulations of extended-release fixed-dose combination dapagliflozin/metformin (10/1,000 mg) tablets in healthy subjects.","authors":"Hae Won Lee, Woo Youl Kang, Ji Seo Park, Jae Hwa Lee, Mi-Ri Gwon, Dong Heon Yang, Eun Hee Kim, Soo-Jin Park, Young-Ran Yoon, Sook Jin Seong","doi":"10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e10","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Two open-label, randomized, two-period crossover studies were conducted to investigate the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties, safety, and bioequivalence of the test formulation (KD4004), a new fixed-dose combination (FDC) formulation of dapagliflozin and metformin extended release (XR) tablets, relative to the reference formulation (10 mg dapagliflozin/1,000 mg metformin XR FDC tablet) in healthy subjects under fasting (Part A) and fed (Part B) conditions. After giving the dose, serial blood samples were collected for a period of 48 hours. Primary PK parameters (AUC<sub>0-t</sub> and C<sub>max</sub>) were used to assess bioequivalence between two dapagliflozin/metformin XR (10/1,000 mg) FDC formulations under fed and fasting conditions. Safety and tolerability were also evaluated. Part A and Part B were completed by 32 and 37 subjects, respectively. Bioequivalence of the two FDC formulations of dapagliflozin and metformin XR tablets was established in both the fasted and the fed conditions as the 90% confidence interval of the ratios of adjusted geometric means for AUC<sub>0-t</sub> and C<sub>max</sub> were contained within the predefined range of 0.800-1.250 bioequivalence criteria. Single-dose administration of dapagliflozin and metformin XR was safe and well tolerated as the two FDC formulations. In conclusion, both FDC formulations of dapagliflozin and metformin XR tablets were bioequivalent in fed and fasted subjects. All treatments were well tolerated.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0004026.</p>","PeriodicalId":23288,"journal":{"name":"Translational and Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"31 2","pages":"105-113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8e/9d/tcp-31-105.PMC10333646.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9816599","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Wald confidence interval has been used as the conventional method of interval estimation for the parameters in nonlinear models. Because Wald confidence interval is symmetric around the point estimate, it does not reflect the asymmetry of the likelihood profile in nonlinear regression. In contrast, a likelihood interval is estimated directly from the likelihood profile and does reflect the shape of the likelihood profile. However, the lack of software for the estimation of likelihood intervals and visualization of likelihood profiles posed an obstacle to the use of likelihood intervals in nonlinear models. There was a need for software implementation to tackle these tasks. Likelihood interval estimation and likelihood profile plotting for nonlinear models had not been previously implemented in R software. This article describes the implementation of likelihood interval estimation and likelihood profile plotting in the wnl R software package. To demonstrate the usage of implemented functions, an example of fitting a nonlinear pharmacokinetic model to concentration-time data is presented.
{"title":"Likelihood interval for nonlinear regression.","authors":"Moon Hee Lee, Kyun-Seop Bae","doi":"10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Wald confidence interval has been used as the conventional method of interval estimation for the parameters in nonlinear models. Because Wald confidence interval is symmetric around the point estimate, it does not reflect the asymmetry of the likelihood profile in nonlinear regression. In contrast, a likelihood interval is estimated directly from the likelihood profile and does reflect the shape of the likelihood profile. However, the lack of software for the estimation of likelihood intervals and visualization of likelihood profiles posed an obstacle to the use of likelihood intervals in nonlinear models. There was a need for software implementation to tackle these tasks. Likelihood interval estimation and likelihood profile plotting for nonlinear models had not been previously implemented in R software. This article describes the implementation of likelihood interval estimation and likelihood profile plotting in the wnl R software package. To demonstrate the usage of implemented functions, an example of fitting a nonlinear pharmacokinetic model to concentration-time data is presented.</p>","PeriodicalId":23288,"journal":{"name":"Translational and Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"31 2","pages":"85-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e7/83/tcp-31-85.PMC10333647.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10192786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-01Epub Date: 2023-06-26DOI: 10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e9
Kyungmee Choi
This article reviews the Bayesian inference with the Monte Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC) and the Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) samplers as a competitor of the classical likelihood statistical inference for pharmacometricians. The MCMC and the HMC samplers have greatly contributed to realization of the Bayesian methods with minimal requirement of mathematical theory. They do not require any closed form of the posterior density nor linear approximation of complex nonlinear models in high dimension even with non-conjugate priors. The HMC even weakens the dependency of the chain and improves computational efficiency. Pharmacometrics is one of great beneficiaries since they use complex multivariate multilevel nonlinear mixed effects models based on the restricted maximum likelihood estimation. Comprehension of the Bayesian approach will help pharmacometricians to access the data analysis more conveniently.
{"title":"A review of the Bayesian approach with the MCMC and the HMC as a competitor of classical likelihood statistics for pharmacometricians.","authors":"Kyungmee Choi","doi":"10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e9","DOIUrl":"10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article reviews the Bayesian inference with the Monte Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC) and the Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) samplers as a competitor of the classical likelihood statistical inference for pharmacometricians. The MCMC and the HMC samplers have greatly contributed to realization of the Bayesian methods with minimal requirement of mathematical theory. They do not require any closed form of the posterior density nor linear approximation of complex nonlinear models in high dimension even with non-conjugate priors. The HMC even weakens the dependency of the chain and improves computational efficiency. Pharmacometrics is one of great beneficiaries since they use complex multivariate multilevel nonlinear mixed effects models based on the restricted maximum likelihood estimation. Comprehension of the Bayesian approach will help pharmacometricians to access the data analysis more conveniently.</p>","PeriodicalId":23288,"journal":{"name":"Translational and Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"31 2","pages":"69-84"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e4/0d/tcp-31-69.PMC10333649.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10192780","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-01DOI: 10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e11
Minkyung Oh, Heechan Lee, Seokuee Kim, Bongtae Kim, Geun Seog Song, Jae-Gook Shin, Jong-Lyul Ghim
Tegoprazan is a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker that treats gastric acid-related diseases. Clarithromycin was widely used as one of various regimens for eradicating Helicobacter pylori. This study compared the pharmacokinetic and safety profile of tegoprazan and clarithromycin between combination therapy and monotherapy to evaluate the potential drug-drug interaction. An open-label, randomized, 6-sequence, 3-period crossover study was conducted in 24 healthy subjects. According to the assigned sequence, the subject was administered the assigned treatment during 5 days in each period. PK parameters of tegoprazan and clarithromycin administered in combination were compared with those of the respective monotherapies. The co-administration of tegoprazan with clarithromycin increased maximum steady-state plasma concentration (Css,max) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve in dosing interval at steady-state (AUCss,tau) of tegoprazan (1.6-fold in Css,max and 2.5-fold in AUCss,tau) and M1 (2.0-fold in Css,max, 2.5-fold in AUCss,tau) than tegoprazan alone. The Css,max and AUCss,tau of 14-hydroxyclarithromycin increased 1.8- and 2.0-fold in co-administration, respectively. The AUCss.tau of clarithromycin was slightly increased in co-administration, but Css,max was not changed. Combination of tegoprazan and clarithromycin and those of the respective monotherapies were tolerated in 24 healthy subjects. There may exist drug interaction that lead to reciprocal increase in plasma drug concentrations when tegoprazan and clarithromycin were administrated in combination and no safety concerns were raised. It is suggested that an in-depth analysis of the concentration-response relationship is necessary to determine whether these concentration changes warrant clinical action.
{"title":"Evaluation of pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction between tegoprazan and clarithromycin in healthy subjects.","authors":"Minkyung Oh, Heechan Lee, Seokuee Kim, Bongtae Kim, Geun Seog Song, Jae-Gook Shin, Jong-Lyul Ghim","doi":"10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e11","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e11","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tegoprazan is a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker that treats gastric acid-related diseases. Clarithromycin was widely used as one of various regimens for eradicating <i>Helicobacter pylori</i>. This study compared the pharmacokinetic and safety profile of tegoprazan and clarithromycin between combination therapy and monotherapy to evaluate the potential drug-drug interaction. An open-label, randomized, 6-sequence, 3-period crossover study was conducted in 24 healthy subjects. According to the assigned sequence, the subject was administered the assigned treatment during 5 days in each period. PK parameters of tegoprazan and clarithromycin administered in combination were compared with those of the respective monotherapies. The co-administration of tegoprazan with clarithromycin increased maximum steady-state plasma concentration (C<sub>ss,max</sub>) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve in dosing interval at steady-state (AUC<sub>ss,tau</sub>) of tegoprazan (1.6-fold in C<sub>ss,max</sub> and 2.5-fold in AUC<sub>ss,tau</sub>) and M1 (2.0-fold in C<sub>ss,max</sub>, 2.5-fold in AUC<sub>ss,tau</sub>) than tegoprazan alone. The C<sub>ss,max</sub> and AUC<sub>ss,tau</sub> of 14-hydroxyclarithromycin increased 1.8- and 2.0-fold in co-administration, respectively. The AUC<sub>ss.tau</sub> of clarithromycin was slightly increased in co-administration, but C<sub>ss,max</sub> was not changed. Combination of tegoprazan and clarithromycin and those of the respective monotherapies were tolerated in 24 healthy subjects. There may exist drug interaction that lead to reciprocal increase in plasma drug concentrations when tegoprazan and clarithromycin were administrated in combination and no safety concerns were raised. It is suggested that an in-depth analysis of the concentration-response relationship is necessary to determine whether these concentration changes warrant clinical action.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02052336.</p>","PeriodicalId":23288,"journal":{"name":"Translational and Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"31 2","pages":"114-123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a1/80/tcp-31-114.PMC10333645.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10192782","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Protein supplements are extensively used for muscle building, weight loss, recovery from exercise, improving endurance & cardio-performance. Major challenge with protein supplement is undigested protein and impaired gut health which results in nausea, dehydration, diarrhea, constipation, indigestion, stomach pain, and decreased appetite. Several studies have linked plant protein with reduced metabolic syndrome incidence. Probiotics can improve gut health as well. The objective of the study is to assess the efficacy and safety of protein supplement in promoting health and wellbeing in healthy adults. The present trial is a double blind, multi-center, randomized, placebo controlled, clinical trial involving 60 healthy individuals. The treatment duration was of 90 days. The subjects were randomized to receive either protein supplement treatment or placebo control. Protein supplement significantly improved quality-of-life score by 85.76%, VO2 max by 42.92%, distance covered in 6 minutes, 100% individuals with at least 25% reduction in low energy events as compared to the control group. Protein supplement treatment reduced body weight (1.94 kg), waist circumference (2.46 cm), body mass index, waist circumference, hip circumference and body fat. Remarkable and significant improvement in digestive and sleep quality score, percent skeletal muscle was observed among protein supplement treated group. There were no clinically significant changes in hematological, biochemical and vital parameters; indicating safety of protein supplement. Present study concluded that protein supplement is safe and efficacious in weight management, improving high energy events, aerobic capacity, quality of life, digestive behavior score and sleep quality. This study ensures consumers about safety and effectiveness of protein supplement.
{"title":"Efficacy and safety assessment of protein supplement - micronutrient fortification in promoting health and wellbeing in healthy adults - a randomized placebo-controlled trial.","authors":"Pranit Ambulkar, Prashant Hande, Bhagwat Tambe, Vidyadhar G Vaidya, Ninad Naik, Ramshyam Agarwal, Gayatri Ganu","doi":"10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Protein supplements are extensively used for muscle building, weight loss, recovery from exercise, improving endurance & cardio-performance. Major challenge with protein supplement is undigested protein and impaired gut health which results in nausea, dehydration, diarrhea, constipation, indigestion, stomach pain, and decreased appetite. Several studies have linked plant protein with reduced metabolic syndrome incidence. Probiotics can improve gut health as well. The objective of the study is to assess the efficacy and safety of protein supplement in promoting health and wellbeing in healthy adults. The present trial is a double blind, multi-center, randomized, placebo controlled, clinical trial involving 60 healthy individuals. The treatment duration was of 90 days. The subjects were randomized to receive either protein supplement treatment or placebo control. Protein supplement significantly improved quality-of-life score by 85.76%, VO<sub>2</sub> max by 42.92%, distance covered in 6 minutes, 100% individuals with at least 25% reduction in low energy events as compared to the control group. Protein supplement treatment reduced body weight (1.94 kg), waist circumference (2.46 cm), body mass index, waist circumference, hip circumference and body fat. Remarkable and significant improvement in digestive and sleep quality score, percent skeletal muscle was observed among protein supplement treated group. There were no clinically significant changes in hematological, biochemical and vital parameters; indicating safety of protein supplement. Present study concluded that protein supplement is safe and efficacious in weight management, improving high energy events, aerobic capacity, quality of life, digestive behavior score and sleep quality. This study ensures consumers about safety and effectiveness of protein supplement.</p>","PeriodicalId":23288,"journal":{"name":"Translational and Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"31 1","pages":"13-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9e/07/tcp-31-13.PMC10079511.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9278462","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Male infertility is solely responsible for 20-30% of infertility cases. Oxidative damage of sperm DNA is positively linked with oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (OAT), and male infertility. The antioxidants are being explored worldwide to combat OAT, sperm DNA fragmentation and reactive oxygen species. The objective of the study was to assess the effectiveness of an antioxidant blend in improving sperm count, semen parameters and reducing DNA fragmentation index (DFI) in sub-fertile males. A prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in 300 sub-fertile males (25-45 years) from ten study sites in India. Subjects were randomized in either the antioxidant blend treatment group or placebo group. We assessed changes in sperm count, motility, normal morphology, semen volume, and percent DFI before and after treatment (90 days). To further stratify data on different criteria post hoc analysis was performed. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 10.0 software. There were improvements in sperm count, semen volume, sperm motility, and sperm normal morphology in the treatment group. There was improvement in sperm count in severe oligospermia subjects (sperm count < 5 million/mL, 5-10 million/mL, 10.1-15 million/mL), and high-extremely higher baseline DFI (20-30%, 31-40% and above 40%), as per post hoc analysis. There was no premature discontinuation and adverse events were reported during the study, indicating safety and well-tolerability of treatment. Study results confirmed the well-researched fact of antioxidants being effective to reduce oxidative stress and thus improve sperm DNA integrity and also improved semen parameters in males aged 40 and above.
{"title":"Impact of antioxidants in improving semen parameters like count, motility and DNA fragmentation in sub-fertile males: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.","authors":"Ameet Patki, Rohit Shelatkar, Monica Singh, Sweta Agarwal, Venugopal M, Shashikant Umbardand, Apoorva Reddy, Priya Kannan, Srilatha Gorthi, Gautam Khastgir, Anita Kulshreshtha, Gayatri Ganu","doi":"10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Male infertility is solely responsible for 20-30% of infertility cases. Oxidative damage of sperm DNA is positively linked with oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (OAT), and male infertility. The antioxidants are being explored worldwide to combat OAT, sperm DNA fragmentation and reactive oxygen species. The objective of the study was to assess the effectiveness of an antioxidant blend in improving sperm count, semen parameters and reducing DNA fragmentation index (DFI) in sub-fertile males. A prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in 300 sub-fertile males (25-45 years) from ten study sites in India. Subjects were randomized in either the antioxidant blend treatment group or placebo group. We assessed changes in sperm count, motility, normal morphology, semen volume, and percent DFI before and after treatment (90 days). To further stratify data on different criteria <i>post hoc</i> analysis was performed. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 10.0 software. There were improvements in sperm count, semen volume, sperm motility, and sperm normal morphology in the treatment group. There was improvement in sperm count in severe oligospermia subjects (sperm count < 5 million/mL, 5-10 million/mL, 10.1-15 million/mL), and high-extremely higher baseline DFI (20-30%, 31-40% and above 40%), as per <i>post hoc</i> analysis. There was no premature discontinuation and adverse events were reported during the study, indicating safety and well-tolerability of treatment. Study results confirmed the well-researched fact of antioxidants being effective to reduce oxidative stress and thus improve sperm DNA integrity and also improved semen parameters in males aged 40 and above.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinical Trials Registry-India Identifier: CTRI/2020/12/029590.</p>","PeriodicalId":23288,"journal":{"name":"Translational and Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"31 1","pages":"28-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/86/98/tcp-31-28.PMC10079508.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9278457","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
A-Young Yang, Hyounggyoon Yoo, Wonsuk Shin, Yil-Seob Lee, Hyejung Lee, Sung-Eun Kim, Anhye Kim
Fexuprazan (DWP14012), a potassium-competitive acid blocker, is a medical formulation prescribed to inhibit the secretion of gastric acid. The present study encompasses a comparative evaluation of pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis between the previous (reference) and size-reduced (test) formulation of fexuprazan 20 mg in healthy subjects. The study employed a randomized, open-label, single-dose, 2-sequence, 2-period, crossover design with a 7-day wash-out between periods. A total of 24 subjects were enrolled in this randomized study. During each period, the 21 subjects received either the test or reference formulation. Blood samples were collected at multiple time point ranging from 0 (pre-dose) to 48 hours post-dosing for PK analysis. The calculated PK parameters were considered bioequivalent when the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) were within the bioequivalence limit of 0.8-1.25. Safety and tolerability were included in the evaluation. A total of 20 subjects completed the study. Point estimates (90% CIs) of the GMRs were 1.1014 (0.9892-1.2265) for the maximum plasma concentration and 1.0530 (0.9611-1.1536) for the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration, between the test and reference formulations. The reference and size-reduced test formulations of fexuprazan were well tolerated with no reports of serious adverse events. In conclusion, size-reduced and previous formulations of fexuprazan 20 mg were bioequivalent with regard to PKs, safety and tolerability.
{"title":"Size-reduced fexuprazan 20 mg demonstrated the optimal bioavailability and bioequivalence with the reference formulation.","authors":"A-Young Yang, Hyounggyoon Yoo, Wonsuk Shin, Yil-Seob Lee, Hyejung Lee, Sung-Eun Kim, Anhye Kim","doi":"10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fexuprazan (DWP14012), a potassium-competitive acid blocker, is a medical formulation prescribed to inhibit the secretion of gastric acid. The present study encompasses a comparative evaluation of pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis between the previous (reference) and size-reduced (test) formulation of fexuprazan 20 mg in healthy subjects. The study employed a randomized, open-label, single-dose, 2-sequence, 2-period, crossover design with a 7-day wash-out between periods. A total of 24 subjects were enrolled in this randomized study. During each period, the 21 subjects received either the test or reference formulation. Blood samples were collected at multiple time point ranging from 0 (pre-dose) to 48 hours post-dosing for PK analysis. The calculated PK parameters were considered bioequivalent when the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) were within the bioequivalence limit of 0.8-1.25. Safety and tolerability were included in the evaluation. A total of 20 subjects completed the study. Point estimates (90% CIs) of the GMRs were 1.1014 (0.9892-1.2265) for the maximum plasma concentration and 1.0530 (0.9611-1.1536) for the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration, between the test and reference formulations. The reference and size-reduced test formulations of fexuprazan were well tolerated with no reports of serious adverse events. In conclusion, size-reduced and previous formulations of fexuprazan 20 mg were bioequivalent with regard to PKs, safety and tolerability.</p>","PeriodicalId":23288,"journal":{"name":"Translational and Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"31 1","pages":"40-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ec/64/tcp-31-40.PMC10079506.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9278458","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Heeyoung Kim, Choon Ok Kim, Hyeonsoo Park, Min Soo Park, Dasohm Kim, Taegon Hong, Yesong Shin, Byung Hak Jin
Concomitant administration of lobeglitazone, empagliflozin, and metformin is expected to enhance blood glucose-lowering effects and improve medication compliance in patients with diabetes mellitus. In this study, we investigated the pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions and safety of lobeglitazone and co-administered empagliflozin and metformin, which are approved agents used in clinical settings. Two randomized, open-label, multiple-dose, 2-treatment, 2-period, 2-sequence crossover clinical trials (parts 1 and 2) were conducted independently. In part 1, lobeglitazone monotherapy or lobeglitazone, empagliflozin, and metformin triple therapy was administered for 5 days. In part 2, empagliflozin and metformin dual therapy or the abovementioned triple therapy were administered for 5 days. Serial blood samples were collected up to 24 hours after the last dose in each period for PK evaluation. The primary PK parameters (AUCtau,ss, Cmax,ss) of treatment regimens in each study part were calculated and compared. For lobeglitazone, the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) with 90% confidence intervals (CI) for triple therapy over monotherapy were 1.08 (1.03-1.14) for Cmax,ss and 0.98 (0.90-1.07) for AUCtau,ss. For empagliflozin, the GMRs and 90% CIs for triple therapy over dual therapy were 0.87 (0.78-0.97) for Cmax,ss and 0.97 (0.93-1.00) for AUCtau,ss. For metformin, the GMRs and 90% CIs for triple therapy over dual therapy were 1.06 (0.95-1.17) for Cmax,ss and 1.04 (0.97-1.12) for AUCtau,ss. All reported adverse events were mild. The triple therapy consisting of lobeglitazone, empagliflozin, and metformin did not show any clinically relevant drug interactions in relation to the PKs and safety of each drug substance.
{"title":"Evaluation of pharmacokinetic interactions between lobeglitazone, empagliflozin, and metformin in healthy subjects.","authors":"Heeyoung Kim, Choon Ok Kim, Hyeonsoo Park, Min Soo Park, Dasohm Kim, Taegon Hong, Yesong Shin, Byung Hak Jin","doi":"10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Concomitant administration of lobeglitazone, empagliflozin, and metformin is expected to enhance blood glucose-lowering effects and improve medication compliance in patients with diabetes mellitus. In this study, we investigated the pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions and safety of lobeglitazone and co-administered empagliflozin and metformin, which are approved agents used in clinical settings. Two randomized, open-label, multiple-dose, 2-treatment, 2-period, 2-sequence crossover clinical trials (parts 1 and 2) were conducted independently. In part 1, lobeglitazone monotherapy or lobeglitazone, empagliflozin, and metformin triple therapy was administered for 5 days. In part 2, empagliflozin and metformin dual therapy or the abovementioned triple therapy were administered for 5 days. Serial blood samples were collected up to 24 hours after the last dose in each period for PK evaluation. The primary PK parameters (AUC<sub>tau,ss</sub>, C<sub>max,ss</sub>) of treatment regimens in each study part were calculated and compared. For lobeglitazone, the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) with 90% confidence intervals (CI) for triple therapy over monotherapy were 1.08 (1.03-1.14) for C<sub>max,ss</sub> and 0.98 (0.90-1.07) for AUC<sub>tau,ss</sub>. For empagliflozin, the GMRs and 90% CIs for triple therapy over dual therapy were 0.87 (0.78-0.97) for C<sub>max,ss</sub> and 0.97 (0.93-1.00) for AUC<sub>tau,ss</sub>. For metformin, the GMRs and 90% CIs for triple therapy over dual therapy were 1.06 (0.95-1.17) for C<sub>max,ss</sub> and 1.04 (0.97-1.12) for AUC<sub>tau,ss</sub>. All reported adverse events were mild. The triple therapy consisting of lobeglitazone, empagliflozin, and metformin did not show any clinically relevant drug interactions in relation to the PKs and safety of each drug substance.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04334213.</p>","PeriodicalId":23288,"journal":{"name":"Translational and Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"31 1","pages":"59-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a7/37/tcp-31-59.PMC10079507.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9273564","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Location of trial sites can be a potential source of study bias. Considering that clinical trials have been mostly conducted in urban areas, the distribution of trial sites need to be evaluated. We analyzed clinical trial approval data using social network analysis to quantitatively assess the site-by-site connections. The approval list of clinical trials from the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety database between 2014 and 2021 was analyzed. The number of clinical trials per trial site was counted according to the approval year and study phase and evaluated for distribution using empirical cumulative distribution function plots. Trial sites and conducts of a clinical trial were mapped into nodes and edges in the social network analysis, and basic network parameters were obtained. The clinical trials were concentrated at several trial sites. Forty-nine to 60.6% of phase 1 and up to 30% of the other study phases of clinical trials were at the top 5 trial sites. The annual distribution of the number of clinical trials per site was comparable across the study period. Connections among the trial sites in the metropolitan area were prominent. Graph size and density were higher in phase 3 trials than in the other phases. We demonstrated that the conduct of clinical trials was concentrated in the Seoul Metropolitan Area in both number of trials and connections using social network analysis.
{"title":"Analysis of the distribution of trial sites in South Korea using social network analysis.","authors":"Ki Young Huh, Kyung-Sang Yu, Ildae Song","doi":"10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Location of trial sites can be a potential source of study bias. Considering that clinical trials have been mostly conducted in urban areas, the distribution of trial sites need to be evaluated. We analyzed clinical trial approval data using social network analysis to quantitatively assess the site-by-site connections. The approval list of clinical trials from the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety database between 2014 and 2021 was analyzed. The number of clinical trials per trial site was counted according to the approval year and study phase and evaluated for distribution using empirical cumulative distribution function plots. Trial sites and conducts of a clinical trial were mapped into nodes and edges in the social network analysis, and basic network parameters were obtained. The clinical trials were concentrated at several trial sites. Forty-nine to 60.6% of phase 1 and up to 30% of the other study phases of clinical trials were at the top 5 trial sites. The annual distribution of the number of clinical trials per site was comparable across the study period. Connections among the trial sites in the metropolitan area were prominent. Graph size and density were higher in phase 3 trials than in the other phases. We demonstrated that the conduct of clinical trials was concentrated in the Seoul Metropolitan Area in both number of trials and connections using social network analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":23288,"journal":{"name":"Translational and Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"31 1","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ba/d7/tcp-31-1.PMC10079509.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9278461","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}