Treatments in Endocrinology最新文献

Last decade has seen important advances in radiotherapy technology which combine precise tumor localization with accurate targeted delivery of radiation. This technique of high precision conformal radiotherapy, described as stereotactic radiotherapy or radiosurgery, uses modern linear accelerators available in most radiation oncology departments. The article describes the new technique as applied to the treatment of pituitary adenoma and reviews published clinical results.

Appropriate insulin therapy is central to the management of all individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus. The potential role of adjunctive therapy in type 1 diabetes is to improve insulin action, and facilitate the ability of all individuals with type 1 diabetes to achieve and maintain 'better' metabolic control. The landmark clinical trial in type 1 diabetes is the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT). The DCCT showed that there is no threshold below which a reduction in glycemia would not provide further benefit against diabetes-related microvascular complications. This study in particular provides the rationale for attempting to achieve as near normoglycemia as possible. We review the use of recognized pharmacologic agents as potential insulin adjunctives in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Adjunctive therapies can be grouped into the following categories based on their putative mechanism of action: enhancement of insulin action (e.g. the biguanides and thiazolidinediones), alteration of gastrointestinal nutrient delivery (e.g. acarbose and amylin), and other targets of action (e.g. pirenzepine and insulin-like growth factor-1 [IGF-1], which reduce growth hormone secretion, and glucagon-like peptide-1, which acts to stimulate insulin secretion). Many of these agents have been found to be effective in short-term studies with decreases in glycosylated hemoglobin of 0.5-1.0%, lowered postprandial blood glucose levels, and decreased daily insulin doses. Adverse effects such as poor gastrointestinal tolerability (metformin, acarbose) or potential acceleration of retinopathy (IGF-1) indicates the need for further studies of efficacy, safety, and patient selection before these adjunctive therapies can be widely recommended in type 1 diabetes.

The regulation of bodyweight is a complex process involving the interplay of neuronal circuitries controlling food intake and energy expenditure (thermogenesis) with endocrine secretions modulating the activity of the neurons making up those circuitries. The neurons controlling food intake and thermogenesis also modulate the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, the role of which in the regulation of energy balance has been acknowledged for some time. These neurons secrete various neuromolecules or neuropeptides including endocannabinoids, neuropeptide Y, agouti-related protein, melanin-concentrating hormone, orexins (hypocretins), melanocortins, cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated transcript, thyrotropin-releasing hormone, corticotropin-releasing hormone, and urocortins. Among those peptides, neuropeptide Y, agouti-related peptide, melanin-concentrating hormone, orexins, and endocannabinoids have been classified as being anabolic molecules whereas melanocortins, cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated transcript, thyrotropin-releasing hormone, and corticotropin-releasing hormone are referred to as catabolic peptides. The expression and secretion of these neuromolecules are known to be affected by the anabolic (corticosteroids and ghrelin) and catabolic (leptin, insulin, and glucagon-like peptide 1) peripheral hormones. A link is made between the pathways regulating energy balance and those modulating the activity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis.

In the new oral, once-daily, extended-release (ER), single-composition osmotic tablet formulation of the biguanide metformin hydrochloride (metformin XT), metformin is released at a controlled rate from a central osmotic tablet core through a semipermeable coating. A decrease in fasting plasma insulin, a marker of insulin resistance, was seen with metformin XT but not with immediate-release (IR) metformin in one well designed trial, but changes were similar in another. The pharmacokinetics of metformin XT reflect its extended-release characteristics. While the bioavailability (in terms of area under the plasma concentration-time curve) of metformin XT taken after the evening meal is similar to that of the IR formulation taken in divided doses, time to peak plasma concentrations is prolonged. Increases in metformin XT dose from 1000mg to 2500mg resulted in predictable and consistent dose-associated increases in metformin exposure. As with other ER metformin formulations, the bioavailability of metformin XT is increased after food, in contrast to the slight decrease seen with the IR formulation. The efficacy of metformin XT 1000, 1500, 2000, or 2500mg once daily with the evening meal was found not inferior to a similar dose range of metformin IR given in divided doses (measured by changes in glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA(1c)]) in a well designed study of 659 evaluable patients with type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus previously stabilized on metformin IR. Metformin XT and IR 2000 or 2500 mg/day had clinically similar efficacy (using changes in HbA(1c) and fasting plasma glucose) in another well designed study of 102 evaluable patients with type 2 diabetes. Like the IR formulation, metformin XT is generally well tolerated; gastro-intestinal adverse events are, however, common.

A number of aldose reductase inhibitors (ARIs) have been developed over the past few decades with the expectation of therapeutic effects for diabetic complications. Neuropathy is the complication that has been most intensively studied as a potential target for ARIs. Most ARIs have shown satisfactory effects in animal models. However, the clinical potential of ARIs in diabetic patients has been controversial due to the lack of conclusive evidence. The safety of this category of drugs is also uncertain. This article summarizes the results of clinical trials of ARIs for patients with diabetic neuropathy that have been performed to date. The efficacy and toxicity of each ARI will be briefly assessed by the clinical data. The theoretical background along with major issues in the evaluation of drug efficacy will also be discussed. Overall the observed efficacy varied among the compounds. A few ARIs showed favorable effects in multiple endpoints in the majority of trials, while the results from many ARIs seemed ambivalent. One drug barely exhibited positive effects on any endpoint. This discrepancy may be attributable at least in part to the different degree of inhibition of the polyol pathway in nerve tissues, which is determined not only by the pharmacokinetic properties of the drug but also by its penetration into nerve tissues. In addition to the uncertain potential of each ARI, the issues of design and analytical methods used for clinical trials may underlie the ambivalent outcomes. The power of analysis and the duration of trials were apparently inadequate in a large number of the studies. Various indices selected as endpoints are not necessarily sensitive or reproducible. Studies of longer duration, large-scale trials, better methods to assess neuropathy, and the selection of patients with a homogenous background would provide more conclusive evidence. The risk of serious adverse reactions, for example, hypersensitivity reactions and hepatic damage, has led to some ARIs being withdrawn from the market or from further development. These adverse effects, however, do not appear to result from the inhibition of aldose reductase activity per se but from specific reactions to each compound. In conclusion, sufficient inhibition of the nerve aldose reductase activity seems likely to prevent or ameliorate diabetic neuropathy, and further development of more potent and safe ARIs is necessary before extensive clinical application.

Since their introduction into clinical practice, somatostatin analogs have been the pharmacological therapy of choice for the treatment of acromegaly. The first preparations of somatostatin analogs available for clinical use were administered subcutaneously two or three times daily, which was not optimal with respect to patient compliance. The introduction of long-acting formulations of somatostatin analogs has overcome this inconvenience. Lanreotide Autogel, a new viscous, supersaturated, aqueous solution of lanreotide, is available in a prefilled syringe and administered by deep subcutaneous injection every 28 days. Lanreotide Autogel has different pharmacokinetic properties from the earlier lanreotide slow-release (SR) formulation, which may account for its better tolerability. Furthermore, lanreotide Autogel is at least as efficacious as the other somatostatin analogs in lowering growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels in the majority and in restoring safe GH and age-normalized IGF-1 levels in about 50-60% of patients with acromegaly. In conclusion, lanreotide Autogel is a valuable new addition to the acromegaly treatment armamentarium. Patients receiving intramuscular lanreotide SR injections every 7-14 days can be switched to an appropriate dose of deep subcutaneous lanreotide Autogel every 28 days, without any impact on safety or loss of efficacy.

In industrialized countries, coronary heart disease (CHD) is not only the leading cause of death in women but of disability as well. Menopause, regardless of age at onset, is associated with a marked increase in CHD risk. Based on epidemiologic studies demonstrating mainly positive biologic effects of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on CHD risk factors and outcomes, earlier recommendations decreed that most, if not all, postmenopausal women should be treated with long-term HRT. Recent randomized controlled trials with clinical CHD endpoints have shown that previously held dicta may not be accurate. Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) such as tamoxifen and raloxifene are alternatives to HRT. SERMs represent a growing class of compounds that act as either estrogen receptor agonists or antagonists in a tissue-selective manner. This pharmacologic profile may offer the opportunity to dissociate favorable cardiovascular effects of estrogen from unfavorable stimulatory effects on the breast and endometrium. The only data available regarding the effects of tamoxifen on cardiovascular events in postmenopausal women are from breast cancer trials. They showed fewer fatal myocardial events in women randomly assigned to tamoxifen compared with women assigned to placebo. Raloxifene is a so-called second-generation SERM. It seems clear that raloxifene increases bone mineral density, has no effect on the endometrium, and holds high promise for the prevention of breast cancer. The effect of raloxifene on cardiovascular disease is uncertain. On the basis of the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) trial, raloxifene may offer some protection to women with cardiovascular disease or to those who are at high risk. Proof that raloxifene reduces the risk of CHD requires a clinical trial with hard clinical endpoints. Such a study is currently underway. Clinical trials have demonstrated that the synthetic 19-nortestosterone derivative tibolone reduces climacteric complaints and prevent osteoporosis without causing menstrual bleeding. Tibolone lowers lipoprotein(a), fibrinogen, and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 levels and improves glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity, and endothelial function; however, it also lowers high-density lipoprotein cholesterol by >20%. The long-term impact of tibolone on the risk of CHD is not known and needs to be studied.

Osteoporosis is the most prevalent metabolic bone disease and is characterized by diminished bone strength predisposing to an increased risk of fracture. Its incidence is particularly high in postmenopausal women but it can also affect other groups, such as men and patients receiving corticosteroid therapy. Calcitonin is a naturally occurring peptide which acts via specific receptors to strongly inhibit osteoclast function. It has been used in the treatment of osteoporosis for many years. Historically, calcitonin was administered as a parenteral injection, but the intranasal formulation is now the most widely used because of its improved tolerability. New approaches are currently being investigated to enhance the bioavailability and effects of calcitonin, including oral, pulmonary, and transdermal routes of administration, and novel allosteric activators of the calcitonin receptor. Several controlled trials have reported that calcitonin stabilizes and in some cases produces a short-term increase in bone density at the lumbar spine level. The most relevant clinical trial to evaluate the effect of calcitonin in the prevention of fractures was the Prevent Recurrence of Osteoporotic Fractures (PROOF) study, a 5-year double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial showing that salmon calcitonin nasal spray at a dosage of 200 IU/day can reduce the risk of vertebral osteoporotic fractures by 33% (relative risk [RR] = 0.67; 95% CI 0.47, 0.97; p = 0.03). However, the 100 and 400 IU/day dosages did not significantly reduce vertebral fracture risk. Effects on nonvertebral fractures were not significant (RR = 0.80; 95% CI 0.59, 1.09; p = 0.16). There is mounting evidence to show that calcitonin diminishes bone pain in osteoporotic vertebral fractures, which may have clinical utility in vertebral crush fracture syndrome. A recent study suggests that nasal salmon calcitonin appears to be a promising therapeutic approach for the treatment of men with idiopathic osteoporosis, although long-term trials are necessary to confirm these results and evaluate fracture rate as an endpoint in men. The role of calcitonin in corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis remains controversial, hence it can only be considered a second-line agent for the treatment of patients with low bone mineral density who are receiving long-term corticosteroid therapy.