Pub Date : 2005-01-01DOI: 10.2165/00024677-200504010-00001
Ute Thyen, Hertha Richter-Appelt, Claudia Wiesemann, Paul-Martin Holterhus, Olaf Hiort
Biologic factors such as genetic and hormonal influences contribute to gender identity, gender role behavior, and sexual orientation in humans, but this relationship is considerably modified by psychologic, social, and cultural factors. The recognition of biologically determined conditions leading to incongruity of genetically determined sex, somatic phenotype, and gender identity has led to growing interest in gender role development and gender identity in individuals with intersex conditions. Sex assignment of children with ambiguous genitalia remains a difficult decision for the families involved and subject to controversial discussion among professionals and self-help groups. Although systematic empirical data on outcomes of functioning and health-related quality of life are sparse, anecdotal evidence from case series and individual patients about their experiences in healthcare suggests traumatic experiences in some. This article reviews the earlier 'optimal gender policy' as well as the more recent 'full consent policy' and reviews published data on both surgical and psychosocial outcomes. The professional debate on deciding on sex assignment in children with intersex conditions is embedded in a much wider public discourse on gender as a social construction. Given that the empirical basis of our knowledge of the causes, treatment options, long-term outcomes, and patient preferences is insufficient, we suggest preliminary recommendations based on clinical experience, study of the literature, and interviews with affected individuals.
{"title":"Deciding on gender in children with intersex conditions: considerations and controversies.","authors":"Ute Thyen, Hertha Richter-Appelt, Claudia Wiesemann, Paul-Martin Holterhus, Olaf Hiort","doi":"10.2165/00024677-200504010-00001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2165/00024677-200504010-00001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Biologic factors such as genetic and hormonal influences contribute to gender identity, gender role behavior, and sexual orientation in humans, but this relationship is considerably modified by psychologic, social, and cultural factors. The recognition of biologically determined conditions leading to incongruity of genetically determined sex, somatic phenotype, and gender identity has led to growing interest in gender role development and gender identity in individuals with intersex conditions. Sex assignment of children with ambiguous genitalia remains a difficult decision for the families involved and subject to controversial discussion among professionals and self-help groups. Although systematic empirical data on outcomes of functioning and health-related quality of life are sparse, anecdotal evidence from case series and individual patients about their experiences in healthcare suggests traumatic experiences in some. This article reviews the earlier 'optimal gender policy' as well as the more recent 'full consent policy' and reviews published data on both surgical and psychosocial outcomes. The professional debate on deciding on sex assignment in children with intersex conditions is embedded in a much wider public discourse on gender as a social construction. Given that the empirical basis of our knowledge of the causes, treatment options, long-term outcomes, and patient preferences is insufficient, we suggest preliminary recommendations based on clinical experience, study of the literature, and interviews with affected individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":23310,"journal":{"name":"Treatments in Endocrinology","volume":"4 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2165/00024677-200504010-00001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24903746","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2005-01-01DOI: 10.2165/00024677-200504040-00003
Ricardo P Garay, Patrick Hannaert, Carlo Chiavaroli
The incidence of diabetic retinopathy is still increasing in developed countries. Tight glycemic control and laser therapy reduce vision loss and blindness, but do not reverse existing ocular damage and only slow the progression of the disease. New pharmacologic agents that are currently under development and are specifically directed against clearly defined biochemical targets (i.e. aldose reductase inhibitors and protein kinase C-beta inhibitors) have failed to demonstrate significant efficacy in the treatment of diabetic retinopathy in clinical trials. In contrast, calcium dobesilate (2,5-dihydroxybenzenesulfonate), which was discovered more than 40 years ago and is registered for the treatment of diabetic retinopathy in more than 20 countries remains, to our knowledge, the only angioprotective agent that reduces the progression of this disease. An overall review of published studies involving calcium dobesilate (CLS 2210) depicts a rather 'non-specific' compound acting moderately, but significantly, on the various and complex disorders that contribute to diabetic retinopathy. Recent studies have shown that calcium dobesilate is a potent antioxidant, particularly against the highly damaging hydroxyl radical. In addition, it improves diabetic endothelial dysfunction, reduces apoptosis, and slows vascular cell proliferation.
{"title":"Calcium dobesilate in the treatment of diabetic retinopathy.","authors":"Ricardo P Garay, Patrick Hannaert, Carlo Chiavaroli","doi":"10.2165/00024677-200504040-00003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2165/00024677-200504040-00003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The incidence of diabetic retinopathy is still increasing in developed countries. Tight glycemic control and laser therapy reduce vision loss and blindness, but do not reverse existing ocular damage and only slow the progression of the disease. New pharmacologic agents that are currently under development and are specifically directed against clearly defined biochemical targets (i.e. aldose reductase inhibitors and protein kinase C-beta inhibitors) have failed to demonstrate significant efficacy in the treatment of diabetic retinopathy in clinical trials. In contrast, calcium dobesilate (2,5-dihydroxybenzenesulfonate), which was discovered more than 40 years ago and is registered for the treatment of diabetic retinopathy in more than 20 countries remains, to our knowledge, the only angioprotective agent that reduces the progression of this disease. An overall review of published studies involving calcium dobesilate (CLS 2210) depicts a rather 'non-specific' compound acting moderately, but significantly, on the various and complex disorders that contribute to diabetic retinopathy. Recent studies have shown that calcium dobesilate is a potent antioxidant, particularly against the highly damaging hydroxyl radical. In addition, it improves diabetic endothelial dysfunction, reduces apoptosis, and slows vascular cell proliferation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23310,"journal":{"name":"Treatments in Endocrinology","volume":"4 4","pages":"221-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2165/00024677-200504040-00003","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24928915","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2005-01-01DOI: 10.2165/00024677-200504040-00001
Maria B Grant, Sergio Caballero
Proliferative diabetic retinopathy is the main cause of vision loss in young and middle-aged adults. There is no accepted pharmaceutical therapy for this disease, although analogs of the naturally occurring growth hormone inhibitor, somatostatin, have been considered leading candidates for developing such therapies. This review examines the history of somatostatin analogs, especially octreotide, in the treatment of ocular complications of diabetes mellitus. The historical observations that indicated a role for somatostatin in retinopathy are discussed from an endocrinology perspective. The molecular mechanisms by which somatostatin may exert its anti-angiogenic effects, both indirect (through antagonism of the growth hormone axis) and direct (through direct antiproliferative and apoptotic effects on endothelial cells mediated by specific receptor subtypes) are described. Animal models that were used to demonstrate an anti-angiogenic effect of octreotide are detailed, as are the results of numerous clinical trials that used octreotide and other somatostatin analogs to treat diabetic retinopathy. The mixed results of these clinical results are examined along with possible explanations as to why these analogs both have and have not shown efficacy in limited clinical settings. Even with these mixed results, somatostatin analogs remain the only therapeutic alternative to patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy who have failed to respond to panretinal photocoagulation.
{"title":"The potential role of octreotide in the treatment of diabetic retinopathy.","authors":"Maria B Grant, Sergio Caballero","doi":"10.2165/00024677-200504040-00001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2165/00024677-200504040-00001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Proliferative diabetic retinopathy is the main cause of vision loss in young and middle-aged adults. There is no accepted pharmaceutical therapy for this disease, although analogs of the naturally occurring growth hormone inhibitor, somatostatin, have been considered leading candidates for developing such therapies. This review examines the history of somatostatin analogs, especially octreotide, in the treatment of ocular complications of diabetes mellitus. The historical observations that indicated a role for somatostatin in retinopathy are discussed from an endocrinology perspective. The molecular mechanisms by which somatostatin may exert its anti-angiogenic effects, both indirect (through antagonism of the growth hormone axis) and direct (through direct antiproliferative and apoptotic effects on endothelial cells mediated by specific receptor subtypes) are described. Animal models that were used to demonstrate an anti-angiogenic effect of octreotide are detailed, as are the results of numerous clinical trials that used octreotide and other somatostatin analogs to treat diabetic retinopathy. The mixed results of these clinical results are examined along with possible explanations as to why these analogs both have and have not shown efficacy in limited clinical settings. Even with these mixed results, somatostatin analogs remain the only therapeutic alternative to patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy who have failed to respond to panretinal photocoagulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23310,"journal":{"name":"Treatments in Endocrinology","volume":"4 4","pages":"199-203"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2165/00024677-200504040-00001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24929472","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2005-01-01DOI: 10.2165/00024677-200504030-00008
{"title":"Opinion and Evidence for Treatments in Endocrine Disorders","authors":"","doi":"10.2165/00024677-200504030-00008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2165/00024677-200504030-00008","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23310,"journal":{"name":"Treatments in Endocrinology","volume":"1 1","pages":"187-197"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82476700","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2005-01-01DOI: 10.2165/00024677-200504020-00005
Roland D Chapurlat
Bisphosphonates are potent inhibitors of bone resorption, used in most bone diseases associated with high bone resorption levels. Several bisphosphonates, developed to prevent and treat postmenopausal osteoporosis, increase bone mineral density and decrease biochemical markers of bone turnover, and more importantly, reduce fracture risk. Alendronate and risedronate have proven their efficacy to reduce vertebral and hip fracture risk among postmenopausal osteoporotic women, using daily regimens. Weekly intermittent schedules, however, are now most commonly prescribed, because they have shown pharmacologic equivalence to the daily regimen. Ibandronate has been the first bisphosphonate to demonstrate vertebral fracture risk reduction using an intermittent regimen. Studies using ibandronate as intravenous injections every 3 months are under way. Zoledronic acid may also be an attractive option for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis if a large ongoing trial proves that a single annual injection of this compound allows osteoporotic fracture risk reduction.
{"title":"Clinical pharmacology of potent new bisphosphonates for postmenopausal osteoporosis.","authors":"Roland D Chapurlat","doi":"10.2165/00024677-200504020-00005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2165/00024677-200504020-00005","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bisphosphonates are potent inhibitors of bone resorption, used in most bone diseases associated with high bone resorption levels. Several bisphosphonates, developed to prevent and treat postmenopausal osteoporosis, increase bone mineral density and decrease biochemical markers of bone turnover, and more importantly, reduce fracture risk. Alendronate and risedronate have proven their efficacy to reduce vertebral and hip fracture risk among postmenopausal osteoporotic women, using daily regimens. Weekly intermittent schedules, however, are now most commonly prescribed, because they have shown pharmacologic equivalence to the daily regimen. Ibandronate has been the first bisphosphonate to demonstrate vertebral fracture risk reduction using an intermittent regimen. Studies using ibandronate as intravenous injections every 3 months are under way. Zoledronic acid may also be an attractive option for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis if a large ongoing trial proves that a single annual injection of this compound allows osteoporotic fracture risk reduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":23310,"journal":{"name":"Treatments in Endocrinology","volume":"4 2","pages":"115-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2165/00024677-200504020-00005","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25018450","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2005-01-01DOI: 10.2165/00024677-200504050-00003
Emily Darby, Bradley D Anawalt
Male hypogonadism is one of the most common endocrinologic syndromes. The diagnosis is based on clinical signs and symptoms plus laboratory confirmation via the measurement of low morning testosterone levels on two different occasions. Serum luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone levels distinguish between primary (hypergonadotropic) and secondary (hypogonadotropic) hypogonadism. Hypogonadism associated with aging (andropause) may present a mixed picture, with low testosterone levels and low to low-normal gonadotropin levels. Androgen replacement therapy in hypogonadal men has many potential benefits: improved sexual function, an enhanced sense of well-being, increased lean body mass, decreased body fat, and increased bone density. However, it also carries potential risks, including the possibility of stimulating the growth of an occult prostate cancer. The benefits of androgen therapy outweigh the risks in men with classic hypogonadism. However, for men with mild hypogonadism or andropause, the balance between benefits and risks is not always clear. Unfortunately, studies to date have included too small a number of patients and have been too short in duration to provide meaningful data on the long-term risks versus the benefits of androgen replacement therapy in these populations. Several products are currently marketed for the treatment of male hypogonadism. Weekly-to-biweekly injections of testosterone cypionate (cipionate) or testosterone enanthate (enantate) are widely used, as they are economical and generally well tolerated. However, once-daily transdermal therapies have become increasingly popular and now include both patch and gel systems. Intramuscular injection of testosterone undecanoate is an attractive new therapy that can be administered quarterly. To confirm an adequate replacement dosage, assessment of clinical responses and measurement of serum testosterone levels generally suffice. For selected men, serial measurement of bone mineral density during androgen therapy might be helpful to confirm end-organ effects. For men aged >50 years, we advocate measurement of hematocrit for detection of polycythemia and a digital rectal examination with a serum prostate-specific antigen level measurement for prostate cancer screening during the first few months of androgen therapy. Subsequently, a hematocrit should be obtained yearly or after changes in therapy, and annual prostate cancer screening can be offered to the patient after a discussion of its risks and benefits.
{"title":"Male hypogonadism : an update on diagnosis and treatment.","authors":"Emily Darby, Bradley D Anawalt","doi":"10.2165/00024677-200504050-00003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2165/00024677-200504050-00003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Male hypogonadism is one of the most common endocrinologic syndromes. The diagnosis is based on clinical signs and symptoms plus laboratory confirmation via the measurement of low morning testosterone levels on two different occasions. Serum luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone levels distinguish between primary (hypergonadotropic) and secondary (hypogonadotropic) hypogonadism. Hypogonadism associated with aging (andropause) may present a mixed picture, with low testosterone levels and low to low-normal gonadotropin levels. Androgen replacement therapy in hypogonadal men has many potential benefits: improved sexual function, an enhanced sense of well-being, increased lean body mass, decreased body fat, and increased bone density. However, it also carries potential risks, including the possibility of stimulating the growth of an occult prostate cancer. The benefits of androgen therapy outweigh the risks in men with classic hypogonadism. However, for men with mild hypogonadism or andropause, the balance between benefits and risks is not always clear. Unfortunately, studies to date have included too small a number of patients and have been too short in duration to provide meaningful data on the long-term risks versus the benefits of androgen replacement therapy in these populations. Several products are currently marketed for the treatment of male hypogonadism. Weekly-to-biweekly injections of testosterone cypionate (cipionate) or testosterone enanthate (enantate) are widely used, as they are economical and generally well tolerated. However, once-daily transdermal therapies have become increasingly popular and now include both patch and gel systems. Intramuscular injection of testosterone undecanoate is an attractive new therapy that can be administered quarterly. To confirm an adequate replacement dosage, assessment of clinical responses and measurement of serum testosterone levels generally suffice. For selected men, serial measurement of bone mineral density during androgen therapy might be helpful to confirm end-organ effects. For men aged >50 years, we advocate measurement of hematocrit for detection of polycythemia and a digital rectal examination with a serum prostate-specific antigen level measurement for prostate cancer screening during the first few months of androgen therapy. Subsequently, a hematocrit should be obtained yearly or after changes in therapy, and annual prostate cancer screening can be offered to the patient after a discussion of its risks and benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":23310,"journal":{"name":"Treatments in Endocrinology","volume":"4 5","pages":"293-309"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2165/00024677-200504050-00003","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25614522","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2005-01-01DOI: 10.2165/00024677-200504010-00005
Alberto M Pereira, Nienke R Biermasz, Ferdinand Roelfsema, Johannes A Romijn
Acromegaly is associated with insulin resistance and an increased incidence of cardiovascular disease. However, it remains unclear to what extent the effects of growth hormone (GH) excess on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality are mediated through insulin resistance versus through other direct or indirect effects of GH. Adequate control of GH excess by surgery or pharmacologic interventions is associated with decreased insulin resistance, reflected in decreased plasma insulin levels and fasting glucose levels or improved glucose tolerance. Despite divergent effects of both somatostatin and somatostatin analogs on GH, insulin and glucagon secretion, and glucose absorption, treatment with the somatostatin analogs octreotide and lanreotide has only limited effects on glucose metabolism. However, glucose sensitivity has only been formally examined using a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp in a minority of these studies. Treatment with the GH-receptor antagonist pegvisomant ameliorates insulin sensitivity, reflected in decreased fasting plasma insulin levels and fasting glucose levels. Nonetheless, the effect of pegvisomant on glucose sensitivity has not been formally tested by hyperinsulinemic clamp conditions. In acromegaly, preliminary observations on new octreotide analogs with greater specificity for somatostatin-receptor subtypes indicate that these compounds achieve better control of GH hypersecretion than octreotide, but may also negatively influence insulin release. Assessment of insulin secretion and glucose levels in acromegalic patients during administration of these compounds is thus mandatory.
{"title":"Pharmacologic therapies for acromegaly: a review of their effects on glucose metabolism and insulin resistance.","authors":"Alberto M Pereira, Nienke R Biermasz, Ferdinand Roelfsema, Johannes A Romijn","doi":"10.2165/00024677-200504010-00005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2165/00024677-200504010-00005","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acromegaly is associated with insulin resistance and an increased incidence of cardiovascular disease. However, it remains unclear to what extent the effects of growth hormone (GH) excess on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality are mediated through insulin resistance versus through other direct or indirect effects of GH. Adequate control of GH excess by surgery or pharmacologic interventions is associated with decreased insulin resistance, reflected in decreased plasma insulin levels and fasting glucose levels or improved glucose tolerance. Despite divergent effects of both somatostatin and somatostatin analogs on GH, insulin and glucagon secretion, and glucose absorption, treatment with the somatostatin analogs octreotide and lanreotide has only limited effects on glucose metabolism. However, glucose sensitivity has only been formally examined using a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp in a minority of these studies. Treatment with the GH-receptor antagonist pegvisomant ameliorates insulin sensitivity, reflected in decreased fasting plasma insulin levels and fasting glucose levels. Nonetheless, the effect of pegvisomant on glucose sensitivity has not been formally tested by hyperinsulinemic clamp conditions. In acromegaly, preliminary observations on new octreotide analogs with greater specificity for somatostatin-receptor subtypes indicate that these compounds achieve better control of GH hypersecretion than octreotide, but may also negatively influence insulin release. Assessment of insulin secretion and glucose levels in acromegalic patients during administration of these compounds is thus mandatory.</p>","PeriodicalId":23310,"journal":{"name":"Treatments in Endocrinology","volume":"4 1","pages":"43-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2165/00024677-200504010-00005","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"24903750","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2005-01-01DOI: 10.2165/00024677-200504030-00004
Madelon van Wely, Claus Yding Andersen, Neriman Bayram, Fulco van der Veen
Anovulation is a common cause of female infertility. Treatment for women with anovulation is aimed at induction of ovulation. Ovulation induction with follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) is indicated in women with WHO type II anovulation in whom treatment with clomifene citrate (clomifene) has failed. The majority of these women have polycystic ovary syndrome. The major disadvantages of ovulation induction with FSH are the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and the risk of higher order multiple pregnancies. To reduce the rate of complications due to multiple follicular development, FSH should be administered using a chronic low-dose protocol with small dose increments. In women with WHO type I anovulation, an exogenous supply of luteinizing hormone (LH) is required to achieve an adequate follicular response to FSH treatment. Thus, ovulation induction with FSH is not the treatment of choice in these women. FSH is a hormone that stimulates follicle growth and oocyte maturation. Endogenous FSH is produced by the pituitary gland and exists as a family of isohormones exhibiting distinct oligosaccharide structures. FSH for exogenous administration is derived from urine or is produced as recombinant FSH. The commercially available FSH products all contain different mixtures of FSH isoforms. To determine the effectiveness of urofollitropin (urinary-derived FSH), a comparison with the other available gonadotropins was made (i.e. recombinant FSH and human menopausal gonadotropin). Urofollitropin and recombinant FSH appear to be equally effective and well tolerated for ovulation induction. Human menopausal gonadotropin is comparably effective to urofollitropin in terms of pregnancy outcomes. It remains unclear whether human menopausal gonadotropins have a higher risk of overstimulation and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome compared to urofollitropin in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. In practice, recombinant products are more convenient to use but are also more expensive. Therefore, if availability is not an issue but costs are, there is still a place for the use of urofollitropins for ovulation induction.
{"title":"Urofollitropin and ovulation induction.","authors":"Madelon van Wely, Claus Yding Andersen, Neriman Bayram, Fulco van der Veen","doi":"10.2165/00024677-200504030-00004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2165/00024677-200504030-00004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anovulation is a common cause of female infertility. Treatment for women with anovulation is aimed at induction of ovulation. Ovulation induction with follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) is indicated in women with WHO type II anovulation in whom treatment with clomifene citrate (clomifene) has failed. The majority of these women have polycystic ovary syndrome. The major disadvantages of ovulation induction with FSH are the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and the risk of higher order multiple pregnancies. To reduce the rate of complications due to multiple follicular development, FSH should be administered using a chronic low-dose protocol with small dose increments. In women with WHO type I anovulation, an exogenous supply of luteinizing hormone (LH) is required to achieve an adequate follicular response to FSH treatment. Thus, ovulation induction with FSH is not the treatment of choice in these women. FSH is a hormone that stimulates follicle growth and oocyte maturation. Endogenous FSH is produced by the pituitary gland and exists as a family of isohormones exhibiting distinct oligosaccharide structures. FSH for exogenous administration is derived from urine or is produced as recombinant FSH. The commercially available FSH products all contain different mixtures of FSH isoforms. To determine the effectiveness of urofollitropin (urinary-derived FSH), a comparison with the other available gonadotropins was made (i.e. recombinant FSH and human menopausal gonadotropin). Urofollitropin and recombinant FSH appear to be equally effective and well tolerated for ovulation induction. Human menopausal gonadotropin is comparably effective to urofollitropin in terms of pregnancy outcomes. It remains unclear whether human menopausal gonadotropins have a higher risk of overstimulation and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome compared to urofollitropin in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. In practice, recombinant products are more convenient to use but are also more expensive. Therefore, if availability is not an issue but costs are, there is still a place for the use of urofollitropins for ovulation induction.</p>","PeriodicalId":23310,"journal":{"name":"Treatments in Endocrinology","volume":"4 3","pages":"155-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2165/00024677-200504030-00004","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25287114","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2005-01-01DOI: 10.2165/00024677-200504050-00006
{"title":"Opinion and Evidence for Treatments in Endocrine Disorders","authors":"","doi":"10.2165/00024677-200504050-00006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2165/00024677-200504050-00006","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23310,"journal":{"name":"Treatments in Endocrinology","volume":"12 1","pages":"323-330"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84795165","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2005-01-01DOI: 10.2165/00024677-200504050-00001
Peter Vestergaard
Osteoporosis is a condition associated with decreased bone strength and an increased fracture risk. It may be defined based on bone mineral density (BMD) with a T-score at the hip or spine of less than -2.5 standard deviations in young healthy individuals or from an osteoporotic fracture (i.e. a fracture occurring after low-energy trauma or no apparent trauma). Risk factors predisposing to fractures include: increasing age; female gender; low BMD; a prior fragility fracture; a family history of fragility fractures; low bodyweight; lack of estrogen in women (i.e. post menopause); corticosteroid use; smoking; a number of diseases; deficiency in calcium and vitamin D; an increased risk of falls (i.e. impaired vision); immobilization; and Caucasian race. The more risk factors that are present the higher the risk of fractures over the following 10 years. The need to initiate preventive therapy with anti-osteoporotic treatment increases steeply with the absolute fracture risk. Indications for referral for dual energy x-ray absorptiometry measurement of BMD include: age >65 years; age <65 years in postmenopausal women with any of the risk factors already mentioned; premature menopause (<45 years); prolonged amenorrhea (>1 year) in younger women; fragility fractures; and diseases or conditions known to lead to osteoporosis.Anti-resorptive therapies include calcium plus vitamin D, bisphosphonates (alendronate, etidronate, risedronate, ibandronate), selective estrogen receptor modulators (raloxifene), hormone replacement therapy, and calcitonin. Guidelines from several countries on when to initiate anti-resorptive therapy state that therapy may be started in patients with a prior fragility fracture (some guidelines state that in this situation no BMD measurements are necessary) or in patients with a T-score of less than -2.5 (some guidelines state that additional risk factors need to be present in this situation). Some guidelines state that anti-resorptive therapy may be initiated in patients with a T-score in the osteopenic range (from -1 to -2.5, i.e. not frank osteoporosis) in the presence of other risk factors. The cost effectiveness of anti-resorptive therapy increases with the absolute fracture risk. In some scenarios, treatment with bisphosphonates may be cost effective in a 50-year-old woman with an absolute hip fracture risk of >or=1.1% over the next 10 years.
{"title":"Anti-resorptive therapy for the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis : when should treatment begin?","authors":"Peter Vestergaard","doi":"10.2165/00024677-200504050-00001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2165/00024677-200504050-00001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Osteoporosis is a condition associated with decreased bone strength and an increased fracture risk. It may be defined based on bone mineral density (BMD) with a T-score at the hip or spine of less than -2.5 standard deviations in young healthy individuals or from an osteoporotic fracture (i.e. a fracture occurring after low-energy trauma or no apparent trauma). Risk factors predisposing to fractures include: increasing age; female gender; low BMD; a prior fragility fracture; a family history of fragility fractures; low bodyweight; lack of estrogen in women (i.e. post menopause); corticosteroid use; smoking; a number of diseases; deficiency in calcium and vitamin D; an increased risk of falls (i.e. impaired vision); immobilization; and Caucasian race. The more risk factors that are present the higher the risk of fractures over the following 10 years. The need to initiate preventive therapy with anti-osteoporotic treatment increases steeply with the absolute fracture risk. Indications for referral for dual energy x-ray absorptiometry measurement of BMD include: age >65 years; age <65 years in postmenopausal women with any of the risk factors already mentioned; premature menopause (<45 years); prolonged amenorrhea (>1 year) in younger women; fragility fractures; and diseases or conditions known to lead to osteoporosis.Anti-resorptive therapies include calcium plus vitamin D, bisphosphonates (alendronate, etidronate, risedronate, ibandronate), selective estrogen receptor modulators (raloxifene), hormone replacement therapy, and calcitonin. Guidelines from several countries on when to initiate anti-resorptive therapy state that therapy may be started in patients with a prior fragility fracture (some guidelines state that in this situation no BMD measurements are necessary) or in patients with a T-score of less than -2.5 (some guidelines state that additional risk factors need to be present in this situation). Some guidelines state that anti-resorptive therapy may be initiated in patients with a T-score in the osteopenic range (from -1 to -2.5, i.e. not frank osteoporosis) in the presence of other risk factors. The cost effectiveness of anti-resorptive therapy increases with the absolute fracture risk. In some scenarios, treatment with bisphosphonates may be cost effective in a 50-year-old woman with an absolute hip fracture risk of >or=1.1% over the next 10 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":23310,"journal":{"name":"Treatments in Endocrinology","volume":"4 5","pages":"263-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2165/00024677-200504050-00001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25614519","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}