Transplantation最新文献

In September 2022, in Banff, Alberta, Canada, the XVIth Banff meeting, corresponding to the 30th anniversary of the Banff classification, was held, leading to 2 recent publications. Discussions at the Banff meeting focused on proposing improvements to the Banff process as a whole. In line with this, a unique opportunity was offered to a selected group of 16 representatives from the pathology and transplant nephrology community, experts in the field of kidney transplantation, to review these 2 Banff manuscripts. The aim was to provide an insightful commentary, to gauge any prospective influence the proposed changes may have, and to identify any potential areas for future enhancement within the Banff classification. The group expressed its satisfaction with the incorporation of 2 new entities, namely "microvascular inflammation/injury donor-specific antibodies-negative and C4d negative" and "probable antibody-mediated rejection," into category 2. These changes expand the classification, facilitating the capture of more biopsies and providing an opportunity to explore the clinical implications of these lesions further. However, we found that the Banff classification remains complex, potentially hindering its widespread utilization, even if a degree of complexity may be unavoidable given the intricate pathophysiology of kidney allograft pathology. Addressing the histomorphologic diagnosis of chronic active T cell-mediated rejection (CA TCMR), potentially reconsidering a diagnostic-agnostic approach, as for category 2, to inflammation in interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy and chronic active T cell-mediated rejection was also an important objective. Furthermore, we felt a need for more evidence before molecular diagnostics could be routinely integrated and emphasized the need for clinical and histologic context determination and the substantiation of its clinical impact through rigorous clinical trials. Finally, our discussions stressed the ongoing necessity for multidisciplinary decision-making regarding patient care.

Background: Concern of ischemia-reperfusion injury reduces utilization of donor lungs. We hypothesized adding L-alanyl-L-glutamine (L-AG) to preservation solution may protect donor lungs from ischemia-reperfusion injury through its multiple cytoprotective effects.

Methods: A lung transplantation cell culture model was used on human lung epithelial cells and pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells, and the effects of adding different concentrations of L-AG on basic cellular function were tested. Rat donor lungs were preserved at 4 °C with 8 mmol/L L-AG for 12 h followed by 4 h reperfusion or monitored for 3 d. Lung function, lung histology, inflammation, and cell death biomarker were tested. Computerized tomography scan was used and metabolomic analysis was performed on lung tissues.

Results: Cold preservation with L-AG improved cell viability and inhibited apoptosis in cell culture. Rat donor lungs treated with L-AG during cold storage showed decreased peak airway pressure, higher dynamic compliance and oxygenation ability, reduced lung injury, apoptosis, and oxidative stress during reperfusion. L-AG treatment significantly changed 130 metabolites during reperfusion, with enhanced amino acid biosynthesis and tricarboxylic acid cycle. Furthermore, cold storage with L-AG decreased primary graft dysfunction grade, improved oxygenation, reduced pulmonary atelectasis, sign of infection, and pneumothorax in a rat left lung transplant 3-d survival model.

Conclusions: Adding L-AG to cold preservation solution reduced lung injury and alleviated primary graft dysfunction by inhibiting inflammation, oxidative stress, and cell death with modified metabolic activities.

Background: To overcome organ shortages, donation after circulatory death (DCD) kidneys are being increasingly used for transplantation. Prior research suggests that DCD kidneys have inferior outcomes compared with kidneys donated after brain death. Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) and normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) may enhance the preservation of DCD kidneys and improve transplant outcomes. This study aimed to review the evidence surrounding NMP and NRP in DCD kidney transplantation.

Methods: Two independent reviewers conducted searches for all publications reporting outcomes for NMP and NRP-controlled DCD kidneys, focusing on delayed graft function, primary nonfunction, graft function, graft survival, and graft utilization. Weighted means were calculated for all relevant outcomes and controls. Formal meta-analyses could not be conducted because of significant heterogeneity.

Results: Twenty studies were included for review (6 NMP studies and 14 NRP studies). Delayed graft function rates seemed to be lower for NRP kidneys (24.6%) compared with NMP kidneys (54.3%). Both modalities yielded similar outcomes with respect to primary nonfunction (NMP 3.3% and NRP 5.6%), graft function (12-mo creatinine 149.3 μmol/L for NMP and 129.9 μmol/L for NRP), and graft utilization (NMP 83.3% and NRP 89%). Although no direct comparisons exist, our evidence suggests that both modalities have good short- and medium-term graft outcomes and high graft survival rates.

Conclusions: Current literature demonstrates that both NMP and NRP are feasible strategies that may increase donor organ utilization while maintaining acceptable transplant outcomes and likely improved outcomes compared with cold-stored DCD kidneys. Further research is needed to directly compare NRP and NMP outcomes.

Background: The global shortage of solid organs for transplantation is exacerbated by high demand, resulting in organ deficits and steadily growing waiting lists. Diverse strategies have been established to address this issue and enhance organ availability, including the use of organs from individuals who have undergone extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR). The main aim of this work was to examine the outcomes for both graft and recipients of solid organ transplantations sourced from donors who underwent eCPR.

Methods: We performed a systematic literature review using a combination of the terms related to extracorporeal life support and organ donation. Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, PubMed and Scopus databases were searched up to February 2024.

Results: From 1764 considered publications, 13 studies comprising 130 donors and 322 organ donations were finally analyzed. On average, included patients were 36 y old, and the extracorporeal life support was used for 4 d. Kidneys were the most often transplanted organs (68%; 220/322), followed by liver (22%; 72/322) and heart (5%; 15/322); with a very good short-term graft survival rate (95% for kidneys, 92% for lungs, 88% for liver, and 73% for heart). Four studies with 230 grafts reported functional outcomes at the 1-y follow-up, with graft losses reported for 4 hearts (36%), 8 livers (17%), and 7 kidneys (4%).

Conclusions: Following eCPR, organs can be successfully used with very high graft and recipient survival. In terms of meeting demand, the use of organs from patients after eCPR might be a suitable method for expanding the organ donation pool.

Background: Strategies to minimize ischemic damage during heart transplantation (HTX) by donation after circulatory death (DCD) are warranted because the inevitable ischemic injury linked to DCD HTX deteriorates mitochondrial respiratory capacity and ultimately graft quality. This study aimed to examine the myocardial mitochondrial function during DCD HTX with hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) and compare the effect of normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) with that of direct procurement and perfusion (DPP).

Methods: A porcine DCD HTX model was used with hearts subjected to either DPP (n = 6) or NRP (n = 7) followed by HOPE and orthotopic HTX. Mitochondrial respiratory function was analyzed by high-resolution respirometry in left ventricle biopsies at baseline, after 180 min of HOPE, and after 60 min of reperfusion post-HTX.

Results: Mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation ( P  = 0.0008), respiratory control ratio ( P  = 0.04), and coupling efficiency ( P  = 0.04) declined during DCD HTX. Fatty acid oxidation was preserved after 3 h of HOPE with a modest, statistically nonsignificant decline after reperfusion ( P  = 0.2). Oxidative phosphorylation was inversely correlated with troponin-T levels ( r  = -0.70, P  = 0.0004). No statistically significant difference in mitochondrial respiratory capacity was observed between participants exposed to NRP and DPP.

Conclusions: Mitochondrial respiratory capacity declined gradually throughout the course of DCD HTX and correlated with the degree of myocardial damage. Following HOPE, the extent of mitochondrial deterioration was comparable between NRP and DPP.

The observation decades ago that inflammatory injuries because of an alloimmune response might be present even in the absence of concomitant clinical impairment in allograft function conduced to the later definition of subclinical rejection. Many studies have investigated the different subclinical rejections defined according to the Banff classification (subclinical T cell-mediated rejection and antibody-mediated rejection), overall concluding that these episodes worsened long-term allograft function and survival. These observations led several transplant teams to perform systematic protocolar biopsies to anticipate treatment of rejection episodes and possibly prevent allograft loss. Paradoxically, the invasive characteristics and associated logistics of such procedures paved the way to investigate noninvasive biomarkers (urine and blood) of subclinical rejection. Among them, several research teams proposed a blood gene signature developed from cohort studies, most of which achieved excellent predictive values for the occurrence of subclinical rejection, mainly antibody-mediated rejection. Interestingly, although all identified genes relate to immune subsets and pathways involved in rejection pathophysiology, very few transcripts are shared among these sets of genes, highlighting the heterogenicity of such episodes and the difficult but mandatory need for external validation of such tools. Beyond this, their application and value in clinical practice remain to be definitively demonstrated in both biopsy avoidance and prevention of clinical rejection episodes. Their combination with other biomarkers, either epidemiological or biological, could contribute to a more accurate picture of a patient's risk of rejection and guide clinicians in the follow-up of kidney transplant recipients.