Transplantation最新文献

Background: The number of deceased donor kidney transplants has been increasing and is at a record high, yet nonuse of kidneys recovered for transplantation has risen to 25.8% following circular kidney allocation system based on 250-nautical-mile circles implemented on March 15, 2021 (KAS250).

Methods: Using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data, we studied all deceased donor kidneys recovered for transplant from March 15, 2019, to January 31, 2023. We calculated the association of multiple factors with kidney nonuse, including increasing recovery of kidneys from nonideal donors, delays in offer acceptance observed under KAS250, and impacts of COVID-19.

Results: In the 2 y before KAS250, the nonuse rate was 21.2%. Had this rate continued, 2334 more kidneys would have been transplanted through January 2023. We estimated that about 769 of these nonused kidneys (33%) were associated with offer acceptance delays under KAS250; about 994 of these nonused kidneys (43%) were associated with increased prevalence of nonideal donors: donation after circulatory death donors, older donors, and donors with elevated peak serum creatinine; and about 542 of these nonused kidneys (23%) were associated with an otherwise unexplained gradual upward trend in nonuse of recovered kidneys across the pre-KAS250 and KAS250 eras. The overall impact of COVID-19 on the nonuse rate was not significant.

Conclusions: The rise in kidney nonuse rate was significantly associated with both increased recovery of nonideal donors, and with KAS250 allocation complexity and delays. Increasing recovery of kidneys from nonideal donors benefits patients because recovering more kidneys increases the number of kidneys available for transplant.

Background: There are few interventional studies using CMV cell-mediated immunity (CMI) to guide antiviral prophylaxis. We assessed the Quantiferon-CMV (QTF-CMV) assay to guide CMV prophylaxis duration in high-risk organ transplant recipients.

Methods: A single-arm, multicenter, prospective interventional study including high-risk kidney, pancreas, liver, and heart transplant recipients who were either donor CMV-seropositive, recipient-seronegative (D + /R - ) or recipient-seropositive with antithymocyte globulin (R + /ATG) induction. CMI testing was performed using the QTF-CMV assay at months 3, 4, 5, and 6 posttransplant. Prophylaxis was discontinued for a positive CMI but continued for a negative result up to a maximum of 6 mo. The primary endpoint was CMV viremia ≥1000 IU/mL up to 1 y posttransplant.

Results: One hundred eight patients were included, comprising kidney (n = 89), kidney-pancreas (n = 7), liver (n = 10), and heart (n = 2) transplants. Eighty-nine patients (82.4%) completed the study protocol (n = 39 D + /R - and n = 50 R + /ATG). In the D + /R - group, only 1 of 39 patients (2.6%) had a positive QTF-CMV result. In the R + /ATG group, 33 of 50 patients (66%) had a positive QTF-CMV result before 6 mo, allowing for early discontinuation of prophylaxis (28 at month 3, 4 at month 4, and 1 at month 5). During the follow-up, CMV viremia ≥1000 IU/mL occurred in only 4 of 33 patients (12.1%) who discontinued prophylaxis early compared with 6 of 17 patients (35.3%) with negative QTF-CMV results and continued prophylaxis (hazard ratio 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.09-1.09; P  = 0.07). No R + patient developed CMV disease.

Conclusions: QTF-CMV-guided prophylaxis appears useful in R + patients who may benefit from a tailored duration of prophylaxis. This strategy does not appear to be useful in D + /R - patients.

Background: Few studies have examined the long-term outcomes of recipients in minimally invasive donor hepatectomies, particularly comparing robotic and laparoscopic donor procedures. Understanding these outcomes is crucial for optimizing surgical approaches and improving the overall success of living donor liver transplantation. This study aimed to compare the feasibility and safety of robotic donor right hepatectomy (RDRH) and laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (LDRH) by evaluating total follow-up patient outcomes.

Methods: This retrospective, single-center study included 117 and 118 donors who underwent RDRH and LDRH between March 2016 and June 2023, respectively. After performing 1:1 propensity score matching, 71 donor-recipient pairs were included in each group. Donor and recipient complications were divided into early (within 90 d) and late (after 90 d) biliary and vascular complications.

Results: In the matched cohort, major complication rates of donors were similar in both groups. Bile duct (BD) variation was not significantly different; however, the rates of multiple BD openings (26.8% versus 54.9%; P  =   0.001) and major biliary complications in recipients were higher in the LDRH group (22.5% versus 42.3%; P  =   0.012). The cumulative biliary complication rate was significantly higher in the LDRH group. Early biliary complications were not significantly different; however, the rate of late biliary complications was higher in the LDRH group (11.3% versus 23.9%; P  =   0.047).

Conclusions: RDRH demonstrated comparable postoperative complications to LDRH in donors but showed fewer recipient biliary complications. This could be attributed to the precision of robotic dissection and BD division, resulting in fewer multiple BD openings.

Chronic rejection is arguably the main obstacle to long-term graft survival. Yet, clinical trials focusing on this condition are disappointingly scarce. Significant advances in treating chronic rejection cannot happen if there is no conduit for testing novel therapies. Here, we identified the main hurdles holding back clinical trials for chronic rejection and outlined a series of actions to address these roadblocks. We suggest that a new strategic plan combining expertise in basic and clinical research and leveraging complementary resources be launched to specifically target chronic rejection and achieve long-awaited progress. We only need the will.

The Banff classification is regularly updated to integrate recent advances in the characterization of kidney allograft rejection, gathering novel diagnostic, prognostic, and theragnostic data into a diagnostic and pathogenesis-based framework. Despite ongoing research on noninvasive biomarkers of kidney rejection, the Banff classification remains, to date, biopsy-centered, primarily relying on a semiquantitative histological scoring system that overall lacks reproducibility and granularity. Besides, the ability of histopathological injuries and transcriptomics analyses from bulk tissue to accurately infer the pathogenesis of rejection is questioned. This review discusses findings from past, current, and emerging innovative tools that have the potential to enhance the characterization of allograft rejection from tissue samples. First, the digitalization of pathological workflows and the rise of deep learning should yield more reproducible and quantitative results from routine slides. Additionally, novel histomorphometric features of kidney rejection could be discovered with an overall genuine clinical implementation perspective. Second, multiplex immunohistochemistry enables in-depth in situ phenotyping of cells from formalin-fixed samples, which can decipher the heterogeneity of the immune infiltrate during kidney allograft rejection. Third, transcriptomics from bulk tissue is gradually integrated into the Banff classification, and its specific context of use is currently under extensive consideration. Finally, single-cell transcriptomics and spatial transcriptomics from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded samples are emerging techniques capable of producing up to genome-wide data with unprecedented precision levels. Combining all these approaches gives us hope for novel advances that will address the current blind spots of the Banff system.

Background: We aimed to assess contemporary transplant outcomes among kidney recipients with amyloidosis, as the treatment and prognosis of amyloidosis have shown improvement over time.

Methods: Using the US Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database, we initially evaluated the changes in patient and graft survival among kidney recipients with amyloidosis from 2002 to 2021. We then compared transplant outcomes between recipients with amyloidosis versus those with diabetic and nondiabetic causes of kidney failure, creating 1:4 matches with highly similar characteristics separately for deceased donor kidney transplant (DDKT) and living donor kidney transplant (LDKT) during the last decade (2012-2021).

Results: We identified 643 kidney recipients with amyloidosis during 2002-2021. Patient and death-censored graft survival improved over time. In the matching analysis for 207 DDKT and 166 LDKT recipients with amyloidosis during 2012-2021, patient survival was not significantly different between amyloidosis and diabetes groups in both DDKT (log-rank, P  = 0.057) and LDKT ( P  = 0.99). Compared with the nondiabetes group, patient survival in the amyloidosis group was not significantly different for DDKTs ( P  = 0.56) but was significantly lower for LDKTs ( P  = 0.04). Death-censored graft failure risk was not significantly different between amyloidosis and diabetes or nondiabetes groups for both DDKTs ( P  = 0.78 and 0.75) and LDKTs ( P  = 0.40 and 0.24).

Conclusions: In this well-matched cohort study, we found no significant differences in patient and graft survival between kidney recipients with amyloidosis and those with diabetes. Similarly, these outcomes were not significantly different between those with amyloidosis versus nondiabetic causes, except for patient survival of LDKT recipients.