Transplantation最新文献

Background: The biological effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection in transplanted kidneys are uncertain with little pathological information.

Methods: This single-center, prospective observational study evaluated kidney transplant biopsies from recipients of deceased donors with COVID-19, current recipients contracting SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant in 2022, against prior BK virus (BKV) infection and uninfected (without SARS-CoV-2 or BKV) samples, as respective positive and negative comparators (n = 503 samples).

Results: We demonstrated nonvirus tubular injury in implanted tissue from infected donors and prevalent recipients with mild acute COVID-19 and acute kidney injury, excluding direct viral infection as a cause of kidney damage. COVID particles were absent in 4116 ultrastructural images of 295 renal tubules from 4 patients with acute COVID-19. No viral cytopathic effect, viral allograft nephropathy, or SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in acute tissues, nor in 128 sequential samples from infected donors or recipients with COVID-19. Following recipient COVID-19 (mean 16.8 ± 12.0 wk post-infection), the biopsy-prevalence of rejection was 33.0% (n = 100 biopsies) versus 13.4% for contemporaneous uninfected controls (n = 337; P  < 0.001). Prior COVID-19 was an independent risk factor for incident rejection using multivariable generalized estimating equation adjusted for competing risks (odds ratio, 2.195; 95% confidence interval, 1.189-4.052; P  = 0.012). Landmark and matched-pair analyses confirmed an association of SARS-CoV-2 with subsequent transplant rejection, with a similar pattern following BKV infection.

Conclusions: Transplantation from COVID-19+ deceased donors yielded good recipient outcomes without evidence of viral tissue transmission. Acute kidney injury during COVID-19 was mediated by archetypical tubular injury and infection correlated with an increased risk of subsequent rejection.

Background: Ex situ normothermic perfusion (ESNP) is a method to evaluate and potentially recondition organs before transplantation. However, increased expression of inflammatory molecules, including by tissue-resident immune cells, may occur during the perfusion process, potentially negating the beneficial effects of perfusion.

Methods: We used RNA sequencing to assess gene expression in 31 livers undergoing ESNP, including 23 donated after circulatory death (DCD) and 8 donated after brain death. In 7 DCD livers, a leucocyte filter was added to the circuit during perfusion. Biopsies were available for transcriptomic assessment in all cases at the start of perfusion and at varying time points postperfusion.

Results: During ESNP in DCD livers, we observed an increase in proinflammatory, profibrinolytic, and prorepair pathway genes. SERPINE1 , encoding plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, was among the genes most significantly upregulated during perfusion in DCD livers, potentially promoting fibrin clot persistence in vasculature. We also found increased expression of monocyte and neutrophil recruiting chemokine and proinflammatory cytokine transcripts during ESNP, but several prorepair molecules, including thymic stromal lymphopoietin, were also upregulated. In both DCD and donation after brain death livers, interferon-gamma response genes were enriched, whereas oxidative phosphorylation genes decreased in organs with high perfusate alanine transaminase, a biomarker associated with adverse clinical outcomes. The inclusion of a leukocyte filter in the perfusion circuit mitigated the induction of inflammation/immune pathway genes during perfusion and was associated with enrichment in oxidative phosphorylation genes.

Conclusions: Leukocyte removal during ESNP abrogates transcriptional changes that are associated with unfavorable clinical outcomes, potentially benefiting human livers undergoing ESNP.

Rejection surveillance after heart transplantation has traditionally relied on numerous endomyocardial biopsies, most of which occur during the first posttransplant year. With the introduction of gene expression profiling and, more recently, donor-derived cell-free DNA, a great proportion of surveillance is being performed noninvasively with both tests. Although patients have welcomed the use of paired testing because of the decreased risk and inconvenience, interpretation of both tests can sometimes be challenging, particularly when the test results are discordant. Growing evidence from both single-center experiences and large national databases has given insights that have allowed the field to operationalize dual testing and provide physicians with algorithms to approach paired testing. The increased use of noninvasive testing has also begun to challenge the role of biopsy as the gold standard for graft monitoring, not only for rejection but over the life of the heart transplant. In a growing number of circumstances, cell-free DNA not only may be a better means of assessing rejection but could also redefine how clinicians approach the diagnosis and even treatment of graft injury. As the heart transplant community garners more experience and generates more data, the current paradigms of heart transplant surveillance will continue to be challenged.

Background: Microvascular inflammation (MVI) is an important pathological feature of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). How posttransplant time affects its clinicopathological expression is little understood.

Methods: This retrospective, single-center study screened 3398 kidney transplant biopsies and dichotomized 202 MVI ≥ 2 (Banff glomerulitis + peritubular capillaritis ≥ 2) samples by 9-mo median incidence time for comparison.

Results: The prevalence of MVI ≥ 2 was 12.4% in transplant kidneys, which failed more frequently than propensity-matched normal controls (n = 202; P  < 0.001). Epidemiological risk factors for early MVI ≥ 2 were delayed graft function, prior AMR, and circulating donor-specific antibodies (DSAs+). Prior recipient sensitization occurred in 72.3%. Early MVI ≥ 2 was classified AMR in 65.3% and cellular rejection in 34.7%, and demonstrated excellent functional recovery and graft survival comparable to normal control kidneys. Late MVI ≥ 2 was predicted by younger (18 = 29 y) age, female recipient, living-donation, prior methylprednisolone, cyclosporine (versus tacrolimus, levels <5 ng/mL), absent antiproliferative therapy, and DSA+ using multivariable epidemiological modeling. Nonadherence caused 49.5%, with iatrogenic minimization responsible for 47.5%, usually for recipient infection. Late MVI ≥ 2 was because of AMR in 93.1%, and characterized by greater interstitial fibrosis, tubular atrophy, complement degradation split-product 4d (C4d) staining of peritubular capillaries+, endothelial C4d staining of glomerular capillaries+, transplant glomerulopathy and vasculopathy scores, DSA strength, and graft failure than early MVI ≥ 2 or normal transplant kidneys. Death-censored graft survival in 149 unique MVI ≥ 2 kidneys was independently determined by nonadherence, serum creatinine, proteinuria, DSA+, Banff C4d staining of peritubular capillaries+, and chronic interstitial fibrosis scores. MVI score and time lost significance using multivariable Cox regression.

Conclusions: The changing expression of MVI ≥ 2 over time is best explained by differences in underimmunosuppression and microvascular injury from AMR impacting allograft function and survival.

Background: Uterus transplantation (UTx) is an emerging therapy for women with uterine infertility. However, critical questions remain with this procedure including the mechanisms involved in graft rejection.

Methods: In this study, we analyzed the immune profile of ectocervical biopsies from 5 patients after UTx before and during their first episode of rejection using RNA sequencing, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and imaging mass cytometry.

Results: We identified 530 upregulated and 207 downregulated genes associated with graft rejection. Enrichment databases revealed abnormalities of skin-associated genes and the immune system, in particular activation of T and B lymphocytes, and macrophages. Imaging mass cytometry confirmed these observations; in cervical biopsies of 3 women, rejection was associated with the presence of B-cell structures linked to tertiary lymphoid structures, and 2 biopsies from 1 woman with severe rejection episodes and poor prognosis of graft function (repeated miscarriage and implantation failures) were associated with an accumulation of HLA-DR - macrophages, producing granzyme B at the surface of the epithelium.

Conclusions: We showed that rejection of a UTx graft was associated with major alterations of immune markers including the involvement of tertiary lymphoid structures, the most organized of which may be a sign of chronic rejection, and with an increase in HLA-DR - macrophages expressing granzyme B in the case of grade 3 rejection episodes according Mölne's classification. We identified potential emerging biomarkers to predict or diagnose graft rejection (Keratin 1 granzyme B, IL1β). These findings could lead to development of improved strategies for the identification, prevention, and/or treatment of uterus graft rejection.

Living kidney donors make a significant contribution to alleviating the organ shortage. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of mid- and long-term (≥12 mo) living donor psychosocial outcomes and highlight areas that have been understudied and should be immediately addressed in both research and clinical practice. We conducted a narrative review by searching 3 databases. A total of 206 articles were included. Living donors can be divided into those who donate to an emotionally or genetically related person, the so-called directed donors, or to an emotionally or genetically unrelated recipient, the so-called nondirected donors. The most commonly investigated (bio)psychosocial outcome after living donation was health-related quality of life. Other generic (bio)psychological outcomes include specific aspects of mental health such as depression, and fatigue and pain. Social outcomes include financial and employment burdens and problems with insurance. Donation-specific psychosocial outcomes include regret, satisfaction, feelings of abandonment and unmet needs, and benefits of living kidney donation. The experience of living donation is complex and multifaceted, reflected in the co-occurrence of both benefits and burden after donation. Noticeably, no interventions have been developed to improve mid- or long-term psychosocial outcomes among living donors. We highlight areas for methodological improvement and identified 3 areas requiring immediate attention from the transplant community in both research and clinical care: (1) recognizing and providing care for the minority of donors who have poorer long-term psychosocial outcomes after donation, (2) minimizing donation-related financial burden, and (3) studying interventions to minimize long-term psychosocial problems.

Frailty occurs frequently among patients with advanced chronic kidney disease, especially among women. Assessing frailty in kidney transplant (KT) candidates is crucial for informing them about associated risks. However, there is poor agreement between frailty scales and research on their correlation with transplant outcomes. Being prefrail significantly impacts both graft and patient survival, often beginning with just 1 Fried criterion. Rather than viewing frailty as a categorical state, it should be regarded as a spectrum ranging from 1 to 5 criteria, with the risk of adverse outcomes escalating as frailty worsens. Frailty status fluctuates during the waiting period for KT; hence, a 1-time frailty evaluation is insufficient to determine risks and implement strategies for improving functional status. Further research should investigate the components of frailty that most frequently change during this waiting period and establish strategies to prevent or reverse frailty. Although careful evaluation of frail KT candidates is necessary to prevent early complications and mortality, exclusion based solely on a frailty score is unwarranted. Instead, efforts should focus on timely interventions to enhance their condition before transplantation. Although evidence is limited, exercise programs appear feasible and yield positive results. A pretransplant clinical framework encompassing multimodal prehabilitation-comprising physical therapy, nutritional measures, and psychological support-during the waiting list period may help alleviate the effects of frailty and poor fitness after KT, ultimately improving key outcomes. Despite logistical challenges, there is a pressing need for interventional trials in this area.