Pub Date : 2024-10-22DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08531-w
Erin M Rodríguez, Spencer Westcott, María Paula Yávar Calderón, Sharon D Horner, Elizabeth C Matsui, Jendayi Dillard, Hadi Fareed, Jennifer Camacho
Background: Latinx children in the United States experience disparities in asthma control and asthma-related functional outcomes compared to non-Latinx White children, including more school absences, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations for asthma. Stress appears to play a role in asthma control, but interventions designed to address the role of stress in asthma control for Latinx children are limited.
Method: The current randomized controlled trial tests the effects of Adapt 2 Asthma (A2A), a family-based coping skills and asthma management intervention tailored to the stressors, strengths, and cultural beliefs of Latinx families, compared to an asthma self-management control arm (the Asthma Plan for Kids; APK). Latinx families of children ages 8 to 14 years old with asthma (target N = 280) are identified and enrolled from primary care clinics and randomly assigned to either A2A or APK. The intervention is delivered by lay health workers trained and receiving ongoing consultation from the study team. The primary outcome is child- and parent-reported asthma control, while secondary outcomes are child's quality of life, lung function, school absences, and emergency department visits, and child and parent coping and family asthma management behaviors. Participants will be assessed at baseline, post-intervention, and at 6- and 12-month follow-up timepoints.
Discussion: This study has the potential to provide new evidence regarding the effects of culturally relevant coping and asthma management intervention strategies for Latinx children with asthma.
Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05118282 . Registered on 11 November 2021.
{"title":"Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial of Adapt 2 Asthma (A2A), a culturally relevant coping skills and asthma management intervention for Latinx Families.","authors":"Erin M Rodríguez, Spencer Westcott, María Paula Yávar Calderón, Sharon D Horner, Elizabeth C Matsui, Jendayi Dillard, Hadi Fareed, Jennifer Camacho","doi":"10.1186/s13063-024-08531-w","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13063-024-08531-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Latinx children in the United States experience disparities in asthma control and asthma-related functional outcomes compared to non-Latinx White children, including more school absences, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations for asthma. Stress appears to play a role in asthma control, but interventions designed to address the role of stress in asthma control for Latinx children are limited.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The current randomized controlled trial tests the effects of Adapt 2 Asthma (A2A), a family-based coping skills and asthma management intervention tailored to the stressors, strengths, and cultural beliefs of Latinx families, compared to an asthma self-management control arm (the Asthma Plan for Kids; APK). Latinx families of children ages 8 to 14 years old with asthma (target N = 280) are identified and enrolled from primary care clinics and randomly assigned to either A2A or APK. The intervention is delivered by lay health workers trained and receiving ongoing consultation from the study team. The primary outcome is child- and parent-reported asthma control, while secondary outcomes are child's quality of life, lung function, school absences, and emergency department visits, and child and parent coping and family asthma management behaviors. Participants will be assessed at baseline, post-intervention, and at 6- and 12-month follow-up timepoints.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study has the potential to provide new evidence regarding the effects of culturally relevant coping and asthma management intervention strategies for Latinx children with asthma.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05118282 . Registered on 11 November 2021.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"25 1","pages":"706"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11495093/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142508850","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-22DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08554-3
Martina Vanova, Aysha Mohamed Rafik Patel, Iona Scott, Gina Gilpin, Emily N Manning, Charlotte Ash, Philippa Wittenberg, Jason Lim, Zoe Hoare, Rachel Evans, Nathan Bray, Christopher M Kipps, Ciara Devine, Saliha Ahmed, Ross Dunne, Anna Koniotes, Catherine Warren, Dennis Chan, Aida Suarez-Gonzalez
Background: Between 25 and 75% of people with persistent post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC) experience cognitive difficulties, compromising functional ability, quality of life, and activities of daily living, including work. Despite this significant morbidity, there is a paucity of interventions for this disorder that have undergone evaluation within a formal trial setting. Therefore, we have developed a cognitive rehabilitation programme, specifically designed to address the cognitive symptoms of PASC, notably impaired attention and processing speed, while also accounting for other PASC symptoms (fatigue, post-exertional malaise) that may aggravate the cognitive impairment. This study protocol outlines a randomised controlled trial (RCT) designed to evaluate the effectiveness of this programme compared to standard clinical care.
Methods: This is a multi-centre, parallel-group, individually randomised controlled trial, comparing standard clinical care with and without cognitive rehabilitation. We will recruit 120 non-hospitalised adults (aged 30-60 years) from three NHS sites in England with a history of COVID-19 infection and cognitive impairment persisting more than 3 months after the acute infection. Participants will be randomised (1:1) to the intervention or control groups, with the latter represented as a provision of standard clinical care without cognitive rehabilitation. The cognitive rehabilitation programme consists of ten 1-hour sessions, delivered weekly. Outcomes will be collected at baseline, 3, and 6 months, with participant-defined goal-attainment scores, relating to functional goals, at 3 months as the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes will be cognitive function, measures of quality of life, social functioning, mental health, fatigue, sleep, post-exertional malaise, and social and health care service use. We will also evaluate the health-economic benefits of cognitive rehabilitation in this population.
Discussion: Cognitive impairment in PASC is a major cause of functional disability with no effective treatment. Accordingly, we will undertake an RCT of cognitive rehabilitation, the protocol of which is published here. If this trial is successful in delivering improvements in trial outcomes, it will address a major unmet need relating to this emergent disorder, with a significant impact on affected individuals and the wider health economy.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05731570. Registered on February 16, 2023.
{"title":"Telehealth-delivered cognitive rehabilitation for people with cognitive impairment as part of the post-COVID syndrome: protocol for a randomised controlled trial as part of the CICERO (Cognitive Impairment in Long COVID: Phenotyping and Rehabilitation) study.","authors":"Martina Vanova, Aysha Mohamed Rafik Patel, Iona Scott, Gina Gilpin, Emily N Manning, Charlotte Ash, Philippa Wittenberg, Jason Lim, Zoe Hoare, Rachel Evans, Nathan Bray, Christopher M Kipps, Ciara Devine, Saliha Ahmed, Ross Dunne, Anna Koniotes, Catherine Warren, Dennis Chan, Aida Suarez-Gonzalez","doi":"10.1186/s13063-024-08554-3","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13063-024-08554-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Between 25 and 75% of people with persistent post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC) experience cognitive difficulties, compromising functional ability, quality of life, and activities of daily living, including work. Despite this significant morbidity, there is a paucity of interventions for this disorder that have undergone evaluation within a formal trial setting. Therefore, we have developed a cognitive rehabilitation programme, specifically designed to address the cognitive symptoms of PASC, notably impaired attention and processing speed, while also accounting for other PASC symptoms (fatigue, post-exertional malaise) that may aggravate the cognitive impairment. This study protocol outlines a randomised controlled trial (RCT) designed to evaluate the effectiveness of this programme compared to standard clinical care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a multi-centre, parallel-group, individually randomised controlled trial, comparing standard clinical care with and without cognitive rehabilitation. We will recruit 120 non-hospitalised adults (aged 30-60 years) from three NHS sites in England with a history of COVID-19 infection and cognitive impairment persisting more than 3 months after the acute infection. Participants will be randomised (1:1) to the intervention or control groups, with the latter represented as a provision of standard clinical care without cognitive rehabilitation. The cognitive rehabilitation programme consists of ten 1-hour sessions, delivered weekly. Outcomes will be collected at baseline, 3, and 6 months, with participant-defined goal-attainment scores, relating to functional goals, at 3 months as the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes will be cognitive function, measures of quality of life, social functioning, mental health, fatigue, sleep, post-exertional malaise, and social and health care service use. We will also evaluate the health-economic benefits of cognitive rehabilitation in this population.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Cognitive impairment in PASC is a major cause of functional disability with no effective treatment. Accordingly, we will undertake an RCT of cognitive rehabilitation, the protocol of which is published here. If this trial is successful in delivering improvements in trial outcomes, it will address a major unmet need relating to this emergent disorder, with a significant impact on affected individuals and the wider health economy.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05731570. Registered on February 16, 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"25 1","pages":"704"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11494741/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142475811","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-22DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08161-2
Yanting Hu, Teng Gao, Xinyuan Wang, Qing Zhang, Shaoheng Wang, Pengfei Liu, Lei Guan
Introduction: Cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) has been established as an effective treatment for peritoneal cancer (PC). However, this kind of combination therapy is associated with a high lactate level. Moreover, studies have suggested that the rate of complications early after surgery directly increased with elevated lactate levels. Glucose-insulin-potassium (GIP), a potent cardioprotective intervention, has been demonstrated to adjust blood glucose (BG) levels and reduce lactate levels. However, the insulin-glucose ratio should be adjusted according to the surgery performed. Here, we aimed to evaluate the advantages of using modified GIP during CRS/HIPEC to reduce the lactate level at the end of surgery and further reduce the incidence of early postoperative complications.
Methods and analysis: The modified GIP versus conventional management during surgery study is a single-center, randomized, single-blinded outcome assessment clinical trial of 80 patients with PC who are between 18 and 64 years old and undergoing CRS/HIPEC. Participants will be randomly allocated to receive modified GIP or conventional treatment (1:1). The primary outcome will be the plasma lactate level at the end of surgery. The secondary outcomes will include the highest levels and fluctuation ranges of lactate and BG during surgery, extubation time, APACHE-II score 24 h after surgery, postoperative defecation and exhaust time, postoperative lactate clearance time, postoperative liver and kidney function, incidence of complications within 7 days after surgery, length of intensive care unit stay (LIS), length of hospital stay (LHS), and total cost of hospitalization.
Ethics and dissemination: The trial protocol was approved by the Scientific Research Ethics Committee of Beijing Shijitan Hospital Affiliated with Capital Medical University, approval number sjtky11-1x-2022(118). The results will be published in international peer-reviewed journals.
Trial registration: ChiCTR2200057258. Registered on March 5, 2022.
{"title":"Effect of glucose-insulin-potassium on lactate levels at the end of surgery in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Yanting Hu, Teng Gao, Xinyuan Wang, Qing Zhang, Shaoheng Wang, Pengfei Liu, Lei Guan","doi":"10.1186/s13063-024-08161-2","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13063-024-08161-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) has been established as an effective treatment for peritoneal cancer (PC). However, this kind of combination therapy is associated with a high lactate level. Moreover, studies have suggested that the rate of complications early after surgery directly increased with elevated lactate levels. Glucose-insulin-potassium (GIP), a potent cardioprotective intervention, has been demonstrated to adjust blood glucose (BG) levels and reduce lactate levels. However, the insulin-glucose ratio should be adjusted according to the surgery performed. Here, we aimed to evaluate the advantages of using modified GIP during CRS/HIPEC to reduce the lactate level at the end of surgery and further reduce the incidence of early postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>The modified GIP versus conventional management during surgery study is a single-center, randomized, single-blinded outcome assessment clinical trial of 80 patients with PC who are between 18 and 64 years old and undergoing CRS/HIPEC. Participants will be randomly allocated to receive modified GIP or conventional treatment (1:1). The primary outcome will be the plasma lactate level at the end of surgery. The secondary outcomes will include the highest levels and fluctuation ranges of lactate and BG during surgery, extubation time, APACHE-II score 24 h after surgery, postoperative defecation and exhaust time, postoperative lactate clearance time, postoperative liver and kidney function, incidence of complications within 7 days after surgery, length of intensive care unit stay (LIS), length of hospital stay (LHS), and total cost of hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>The trial protocol was approved by the Scientific Research Ethics Committee of Beijing Shijitan Hospital Affiliated with Capital Medical University, approval number sjtky11-1x-2022(118). The results will be published in international peer-reviewed journals.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ChiCTR2200057258. Registered on March 5, 2022.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"25 1","pages":"708"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11515742/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142508835","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-21DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08535-6
Lilian Pinto da Silva, Ana Paula Delgado Bomtempo Batalha, Gabriela Lima de Melo Ghisi, Mariana Balbi Seixas, Ligia Loiola Cisneros, Ann Kristine Jansen, Ana Paula Boroni Moreira, Daniele Sirineu Pereira, Raquel Rodrigues Britto, Danielle Aparecida Gomes Pereira, Patrícia Fernandes Trevizan, Paul Oh
Background: Patient education is a crucial strategy for promoting prevention and diabetes self-management since glycemic control achievement involves taking medications, medical nutrition therapy, physical exercise, and behavior changes. However, patient education programs are still barely implemented in low- and middle-income countries. This trial aims to investigate whether a lifestyle education intervention added to physical exercising is superior to sole physical exercising regarding functional capacity, disease-related knowledge, health behaviors, cardiometabolic health parameters, quality of life, depression, and diet quality in individuals with prediabetes or diabetes.
Methods: Multicenter double-blinded randomized controlled trial with two parallel arms involving 12-week intervention and 6-month follow-up. The eligible individuals (≥ 18 years, living with prediabetes or diabetes, literate, no clinical decompensation and/or physical and/or mental limitations that contraindicate physical exercising, written physician permission for exercise, no cognitive impairment, no vision limitations for reading, no confirmed diagnosis of unstable coronary disease or heart failure, no pacemaker and/or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, no complex ventricular arrhythmias, no intermittent claudication, no recent cardiovascular event or cardiac surgery, and no currently enrolled in a structured exercise program) were recruited from two Brazilian cities and randomized to either (1) an Exercise and Lifestyle Education Program (ExLE) or (2) an Exercise Program (Ex), which can be delivered on-site or remotely based on the participants' internet access and technology literacy. The primary outcomes will be changes in functional capacity and disease-related knowledge. The secondary outcomes will involve changes in health behaviors (health literacy, physical activity level, exercise self-efficacy, and medication adherence) and cardiometabolic health parameters (glycemic control, anthropometric measures, and cardiac autonomic control). Program adherence, satisfaction with the program, diabetes-related morbidity, and changes in quality of life, depression, and diet quality will be the tertiary outcomes. Assessments will occur at baseline, post-intervention, and after 6-month follow-up.
Discussion: If superior effectiveness of ExLE compared to Ex program to improve the outcomes measures is found, this program could be delivered broadly in the Brazilian health system, especially in the primary care facilities where most individuals living with prediabetes and diabetes in our country are assisted.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03914924 . Registered on April 16, 2019.
{"title":"Effects of an Exercise and Lifestyle Education Program in Brazilians living with prediabetes or diabetes: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Lilian Pinto da Silva, Ana Paula Delgado Bomtempo Batalha, Gabriela Lima de Melo Ghisi, Mariana Balbi Seixas, Ligia Loiola Cisneros, Ann Kristine Jansen, Ana Paula Boroni Moreira, Daniele Sirineu Pereira, Raquel Rodrigues Britto, Danielle Aparecida Gomes Pereira, Patrícia Fernandes Trevizan, Paul Oh","doi":"10.1186/s13063-024-08535-6","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13063-024-08535-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient education is a crucial strategy for promoting prevention and diabetes self-management since glycemic control achievement involves taking medications, medical nutrition therapy, physical exercise, and behavior changes. However, patient education programs are still barely implemented in low- and middle-income countries. This trial aims to investigate whether a lifestyle education intervention added to physical exercising is superior to sole physical exercising regarding functional capacity, disease-related knowledge, health behaviors, cardiometabolic health parameters, quality of life, depression, and diet quality in individuals with prediabetes or diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multicenter double-blinded randomized controlled trial with two parallel arms involving 12-week intervention and 6-month follow-up. The eligible individuals (≥ 18 years, living with prediabetes or diabetes, literate, no clinical decompensation and/or physical and/or mental limitations that contraindicate physical exercising, written physician permission for exercise, no cognitive impairment, no vision limitations for reading, no confirmed diagnosis of unstable coronary disease or heart failure, no pacemaker and/or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, no complex ventricular arrhythmias, no intermittent claudication, no recent cardiovascular event or cardiac surgery, and no currently enrolled in a structured exercise program) were recruited from two Brazilian cities and randomized to either (1) an Exercise and Lifestyle Education Program (ExLE) or (2) an Exercise Program (Ex), which can be delivered on-site or remotely based on the participants' internet access and technology literacy. The primary outcomes will be changes in functional capacity and disease-related knowledge. The secondary outcomes will involve changes in health behaviors (health literacy, physical activity level, exercise self-efficacy, and medication adherence) and cardiometabolic health parameters (glycemic control, anthropometric measures, and cardiac autonomic control). Program adherence, satisfaction with the program, diabetes-related morbidity, and changes in quality of life, depression, and diet quality will be the tertiary outcomes. Assessments will occur at baseline, post-intervention, and after 6-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>If superior effectiveness of ExLE compared to Ex program to improve the outcomes measures is found, this program could be delivered broadly in the Brazilian health system, especially in the primary care facilities where most individuals living with prediabetes and diabetes in our country are assisted.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03914924 . Registered on April 16, 2019.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"25 1","pages":"701"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11492483/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142475742","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-21DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08539-2
Lucía Guilabert, Karina Cárdenas-Jaén, Alicia Vaillo-Rocamora, Ana García García de Paredes, Ankit Chhoda, Sunil G Sheth, Carlos López-Valero, Pedro Zapater, Eva M Navarrete-Muñoz, Patrick Maisonneuve, Yasmin G Hernández-Barco, Gabriele Capurso, James L Buxbaum, Enrique de-Madaria
Background: Some evidence suggests that fluid resuscitation with lactated Ringer's solution (LR) may have an anti-inflammatory effect on acute pancreatitis (AP) when compared to normal saline (NS) and may be associated with a decrease in severity, but existing single-center randomized controlled trials showed conflicting results. The WATERLAND trial aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of fluid resuscitation using LR compared to NS in patients with AP.
Methods: The WATERLAND trial is an international multicenter, open-label, parallel-group, randomized, controlled, superiority trial. Patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive LR versus NS-based fluid resuscitation for at least 48 h. The primary outcome will be moderately severe or severe AP, according to the revision of the Atlanta classification. The secondary objectives of the WATERLAND trial are to determine the effect of LR versus NS fluid resuscitation on several efficacy and safety outcomes in patients with AP. A total sample of 720 patients, 360 in the LR group and 360 in the NS group, will achieve 90% power to detect a difference between the group proportions of 10%, assuming that the frequency of moderately severe or severe AP in the LR group will be 17%. A loss to follow-up of 10% of patients is expected, so the total sample size will be 396 patients in each treatment arm (792 patients overall). The test statistic used is the two-sided Z test with pooled variance set at a 0.05 significance level.
Discussion: The WATERLAND study aims to improve the early management of AP. Fluid resuscitation is an inexpensive treatment available in any hospital center worldwide. If a better evolution of pancreatitis is demonstrated in one of the treatment arms, it would have important repercussions in the management of this frequent disease.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05781243. Registration date on January 4, 2023. EudraCT number 2023-000010-18, first posted March 23, 2023.
背景:一些证据表明,与普通生理盐水(NS)相比,使用乳酸林格氏液(LR)进行液体复苏可能对急性胰腺炎(AP)具有抗炎作用,并可能降低严重程度,但现有的单中心随机对照试验显示出相互矛盾的结果。WATERLAND试验旨在研究在急性胰腺炎患者中使用LR与NS进行液体复苏的有效性和安全性:WATERLAND 试验是一项国际多中心、开放标签、平行组、随机对照、优效性试验。患者将按 1:1 的比例随机分配接受 LR 与 NS 液体复苏至少 48 小时。主要结果是根据亚特兰大分类修订版确定的中度或重度 AP。WATERLAND 试验的次要目标是确定 LR 与 NS 液体复苏对 AP 患者疗效和安全性的影响。假设 LR 组患者中度或重度 AP 的发生率为 17%,则总样本数为 720 例患者(LR 组 360 例,NS 组 360 例),将有 90% 的力量检测到两组比例相差 10%。预计将有 10%的患者失去随访,因此每个治疗组的总样本量将为 396 名患者(总计 792 名患者)。使用的检验统计量是双侧 Z 检验,集合方差的显著性水平设定为 0.05:WATERLAND 研究旨在改善 AP 的早期管理。液体复苏是一种廉价的治疗方法,在全球任何医院中心都可使用。如果其中一种治疗方法能改善胰腺炎的发展,将对这种常见疾病的治疗产生重要影响:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT05781243。注册日期为 2023 年 1 月 4 日。EudraCT编号2023-000010-18,2023年3月23日首次发布。
{"title":"Normal saline versus lactated Ringer's solution for acute pancreatitis resuscitation, an open-label multicenter randomized controlled trial: the WATERLAND trial study protocol.","authors":"Lucía Guilabert, Karina Cárdenas-Jaén, Alicia Vaillo-Rocamora, Ana García García de Paredes, Ankit Chhoda, Sunil G Sheth, Carlos López-Valero, Pedro Zapater, Eva M Navarrete-Muñoz, Patrick Maisonneuve, Yasmin G Hernández-Barco, Gabriele Capurso, James L Buxbaum, Enrique de-Madaria","doi":"10.1186/s13063-024-08539-2","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13063-024-08539-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Some evidence suggests that fluid resuscitation with lactated Ringer's solution (LR) may have an anti-inflammatory effect on acute pancreatitis (AP) when compared to normal saline (NS) and may be associated with a decrease in severity, but existing single-center randomized controlled trials showed conflicting results. The WATERLAND trial aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of fluid resuscitation using LR compared to NS in patients with AP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The WATERLAND trial is an international multicenter, open-label, parallel-group, randomized, controlled, superiority trial. Patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive LR versus NS-based fluid resuscitation for at least 48 h. The primary outcome will be moderately severe or severe AP, according to the revision of the Atlanta classification. The secondary objectives of the WATERLAND trial are to determine the effect of LR versus NS fluid resuscitation on several efficacy and safety outcomes in patients with AP. A total sample of 720 patients, 360 in the LR group and 360 in the NS group, will achieve 90% power to detect a difference between the group proportions of 10%, assuming that the frequency of moderately severe or severe AP in the LR group will be 17%. A loss to follow-up of 10% of patients is expected, so the total sample size will be 396 patients in each treatment arm (792 patients overall). The test statistic used is the two-sided Z test with pooled variance set at a 0.05 significance level.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The WATERLAND study aims to improve the early management of AP. Fluid resuscitation is an inexpensive treatment available in any hospital center worldwide. If a better evolution of pancreatitis is demonstrated in one of the treatment arms, it would have important repercussions in the management of this frequent disease.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05781243. Registration date on January 4, 2023. EudraCT number 2023-000010-18, first posted March 23, 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"25 1","pages":"699"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11492666/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142475765","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Balance dysfunction affects 70% of stroke patients. Emerging neurophysiological approaches, such as virtual reality therapy (VRT) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), have been proven by clinical studies that the balance function of stroke patients can be improved when applied alone, but there are relatively few studies on the combined treatment of balance dysfunction after stroke. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a 4-week intensive intervention combining VRT and rTMS on both balance function and brain plasticity among stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Rehabilitation Medical Center of the Rehabilitation General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University. A cohort of 136 stroke patients, with durations of 2 to 24 weeks post-stroke, were enrolled in the study. Participants were randomly allocated in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to four groups: the VR group (n = 34), the rTMS group (n = 34), the combined treatment group receiving both VR and rTMS (n = 34), and the control group undergoing traditional balance training (n = 34). All patients underwent a standardized inpatient rehabilitation program over 4 weeks. The VR group received daily 30-min sessions of VR therapy for 20 days. The rTMS group underwent daily sessions of rTMS stimulation for 20 min, targeting the motor imagery region in the affected hemisphere. The combination group received VR therapy after completing their rTMS treatment. The control group received conventional balance training, with each session lasting 30 min. Additionally, all patients received an extra 60 min of standard rehabilitation therapy twice daily. Assessments were conducted at baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks post-treatment, using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) as the primary measure, and secondary measures including the Timed Up-and-Go Test (TUGT), Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Lower Extremity (FMA-LE), and 6-m walking test (6MWT), as well as assessments for brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VGEF), tyrosine receptor kinase (TrκB), motor-evoked potential latency (PL), central motor conduction time (CMCT), and amplitude.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The widespread application of VR technology and rTMS in clinical settings is well-established. However, the potential synergistic effects of combining these modalities on balance function and neuroplasticity in stroke patients remain uncertain. Our hypothesis suggests that the integration of VR with rTMS may result in more pronounced improvements in both balance function and neuroplasticity among stroke patients, surpassing the outcomes achievable with VR alone, rTMS alone, or traditional therapy. The possible mechanism is that VR-based training combined with rTMS plays a superimposed effect, promoting better repair of damaged neurons and ultimately improving balance function in stroke patients. The positive r
{"title":"Effects of VR task-oriented training combined with rTMS on balance function and brain plasticity in stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial study protocol.","authors":"Yuanyuan Liu, Ruizhu Lin, Xinbao Tian, Junyi Wang, Ying Tao, Ning Zhu","doi":"10.1186/s13063-024-08519-6","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13063-024-08519-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Balance dysfunction affects 70% of stroke patients. Emerging neurophysiological approaches, such as virtual reality therapy (VRT) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), have been proven by clinical studies that the balance function of stroke patients can be improved when applied alone, but there are relatively few studies on the combined treatment of balance dysfunction after stroke. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a 4-week intensive intervention combining VRT and rTMS on both balance function and brain plasticity among stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Rehabilitation Medical Center of the Rehabilitation General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University. A cohort of 136 stroke patients, with durations of 2 to 24 weeks post-stroke, were enrolled in the study. Participants were randomly allocated in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to four groups: the VR group (n = 34), the rTMS group (n = 34), the combined treatment group receiving both VR and rTMS (n = 34), and the control group undergoing traditional balance training (n = 34). All patients underwent a standardized inpatient rehabilitation program over 4 weeks. The VR group received daily 30-min sessions of VR therapy for 20 days. The rTMS group underwent daily sessions of rTMS stimulation for 20 min, targeting the motor imagery region in the affected hemisphere. The combination group received VR therapy after completing their rTMS treatment. The control group received conventional balance training, with each session lasting 30 min. Additionally, all patients received an extra 60 min of standard rehabilitation therapy twice daily. Assessments were conducted at baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks post-treatment, using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) as the primary measure, and secondary measures including the Timed Up-and-Go Test (TUGT), Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Lower Extremity (FMA-LE), and 6-m walking test (6MWT), as well as assessments for brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VGEF), tyrosine receptor kinase (TrκB), motor-evoked potential latency (PL), central motor conduction time (CMCT), and amplitude.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The widespread application of VR technology and rTMS in clinical settings is well-established. However, the potential synergistic effects of combining these modalities on balance function and neuroplasticity in stroke patients remain uncertain. Our hypothesis suggests that the integration of VR with rTMS may result in more pronounced improvements in both balance function and neuroplasticity among stroke patients, surpassing the outcomes achievable with VR alone, rTMS alone, or traditional therapy. The possible mechanism is that VR-based training combined with rTMS plays a superimposed effect, promoting better repair of damaged neurons and ultimately improving balance function in stroke patients. The positive r","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"25 1","pages":"702"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11492617/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142475743","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-21DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08559-y
Qian Zeng, Mingchang Chen, Siyi Zheng, Xi Wei, Hongyan Liu
Background: Vital pulp therapy (VPT) has recently been reported as an effective approach for preventing and treating carious pulp injury in permanent teeth. Compared with root canal treatment (RCT), which involves complete removal of the pulp tissue, VPT effectively maintains pulp vitality and retains the physiological functions of the pulp. In the research pool, large-scale randomized controlled trials evaluating the treatment outcome of VPT using calcium silicate cements and RCT in cariously exposed permanent teeth are lacking. Here, we present a monocentric clinical protocol to compare the effects of VPT using iRoot BP Plus (Innovative Bioceramix, Vancouver, BC, Canada) as a pulp-capping material with RCT.
Methods: The proposed trial is an open-label, single-centre, randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial. In total, 462 patients will be included in this trial according to the following criteria: adult patients (18-50 years old), pulp exposure during the treatment of deep caries in mature permanent teeth, a diagnosis of reversible or partially irreversible pulpitis without apical translucency on X-ray, without periodontitis or systemic disease. Patients with signed informed consent forms will be enrolled and randomly divided into two groups (VPT and RCT) with a balanced treatment allocation (1:1). Clinical evaluations will be conducted at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after treatment, with the potential for extension. The primary outcome measure will be the duration of success. The secondary outcomes will include the success rate at the 1-year follow-up and any adverse reactions. The Kaplan‒Meier method and log-rank test will be used to compare the duration of success of both treatments. For other outcomes, the χ2 test or Fisher's exact test will be used for categorical variables, and the t test or Mann‒Whitney U test will be used for continuous variables to assess the differences between groups.
Discussion: The results of this trial will provide a clinical reference for selecting treatments for carious pulp injuries in permanent teeth.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ChiCTR2100051369. The study has been registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) ( www.chictr.org.cn ). Registered on 21 September 2021.
{"title":"Efficacy of vital pulp therapy for carious pulp injury in permanent teeth: a study protocol for an open-label randomized controlled noninferiority trial.","authors":"Qian Zeng, Mingchang Chen, Siyi Zheng, Xi Wei, Hongyan Liu","doi":"10.1186/s13063-024-08559-y","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13063-024-08559-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vital pulp therapy (VPT) has recently been reported as an effective approach for preventing and treating carious pulp injury in permanent teeth. Compared with root canal treatment (RCT), which involves complete removal of the pulp tissue, VPT effectively maintains pulp vitality and retains the physiological functions of the pulp. In the research pool, large-scale randomized controlled trials evaluating the treatment outcome of VPT using calcium silicate cements and RCT in cariously exposed permanent teeth are lacking. Here, we present a monocentric clinical protocol to compare the effects of VPT using iRoot BP Plus (Innovative Bioceramix, Vancouver, BC, Canada) as a pulp-capping material with RCT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The proposed trial is an open-label, single-centre, randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial. In total, 462 patients will be included in this trial according to the following criteria: adult patients (18-50 years old), pulp exposure during the treatment of deep caries in mature permanent teeth, a diagnosis of reversible or partially irreversible pulpitis without apical translucency on X-ray, without periodontitis or systemic disease. Patients with signed informed consent forms will be enrolled and randomly divided into two groups (VPT and RCT) with a balanced treatment allocation (1:1). Clinical evaluations will be conducted at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after treatment, with the potential for extension. The primary outcome measure will be the duration of success. The secondary outcomes will include the success rate at the 1-year follow-up and any adverse reactions. The Kaplan‒Meier method and log-rank test will be used to compare the duration of success of both treatments. For other outcomes, the χ<sup>2</sup> test or Fisher's exact test will be used for categorical variables, and the t test or Mann‒Whitney U test will be used for continuous variables to assess the differences between groups.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results of this trial will provide a clinical reference for selecting treatments for carious pulp injuries in permanent teeth.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov ChiCTR2100051369. The study has been registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) ( www.chictr.org.cn ). Registered on 21 September 2021.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"25 1","pages":"700"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11492771/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142475744","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-21DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08474-2
Milena Silva, David A Wacker, Brian E Driver, Abbey Staugaitis, Laura J Niedernhofer, Elizabeth L Schmidt, James L Kirkland, Tamara Tchkonia, Tamara Evans, Carlos Hines Serrano, Steffen Ventz, Joseph S Koopmeiners, Michael A Puskarich
Background: Senescent immune cells exhibit altered gene expression and resistance to apoptosis. The prevalence of these cells increases with age and emerging data implicate senescence-associated maladaptive signaling as a potential contributor to sepsis and septic shock. The senolytic drug fisetin promotes clearance of senescent cells and is hypothesized to mitigate septic responses to infection.
Methods: We are conducting a multi-center, randomized, double-blinded, adaptive allocation phase 2 clinical trial to assess the efficacy of the senolytic drug fisetin in preventing clinical deterioration of elderly patients diagnosed with sepsis. We intend to enroll and randomize 220 elderly patients (age > 65) with the clinical diagnosis of sepsis to receive either fisetin as a single oral dose of 20 mg/kg, fisetin in two oral doses of 20 mg/kg each spaced 1 day apart, or placebo. The primary outcome will be changed in the composite of cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal sequential organ failure assessment scores at 7 days from enrollment. Secondary outcomes include quantification of senescent CD3 + cells at 7 days, and 28-day assessments of organ failure-free days, days in an intensive care unit, and all-cause mortality.
Discussion: This multi-center, randomized, double-blinded trial will assess the efficacy of fisetin in preventing clinical deterioration in elderly patients with sepsis and measure the effects of this drug on the prevalence of senescent immune cells. We intend that the results of this phase 2 trial will inform the design of a larger phase 3 study.
Trial registration: This trial is registered to ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT05758246, first posted on March 7, 2023.
{"title":"Senolytics To slOw Progression of Sepsis (STOP-Sepsis) in elderly patients: Study protocol for a multicenter, randomized, adaptive allocation clinical trial.","authors":"Milena Silva, David A Wacker, Brian E Driver, Abbey Staugaitis, Laura J Niedernhofer, Elizabeth L Schmidt, James L Kirkland, Tamara Tchkonia, Tamara Evans, Carlos Hines Serrano, Steffen Ventz, Joseph S Koopmeiners, Michael A Puskarich","doi":"10.1186/s13063-024-08474-2","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13063-024-08474-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Senescent immune cells exhibit altered gene expression and resistance to apoptosis. The prevalence of these cells increases with age and emerging data implicate senescence-associated maladaptive signaling as a potential contributor to sepsis and septic shock. The senolytic drug fisetin promotes clearance of senescent cells and is hypothesized to mitigate septic responses to infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We are conducting a multi-center, randomized, double-blinded, adaptive allocation phase 2 clinical trial to assess the efficacy of the senolytic drug fisetin in preventing clinical deterioration of elderly patients diagnosed with sepsis. We intend to enroll and randomize 220 elderly patients (age > 65) with the clinical diagnosis of sepsis to receive either fisetin as a single oral dose of 20 mg/kg, fisetin in two oral doses of 20 mg/kg each spaced 1 day apart, or placebo. The primary outcome will be changed in the composite of cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal sequential organ failure assessment scores at 7 days from enrollment. Secondary outcomes include quantification of senescent CD3 + cells at 7 days, and 28-day assessments of organ failure-free days, days in an intensive care unit, and all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This multi-center, randomized, double-blinded trial will assess the efficacy of fisetin in preventing clinical deterioration in elderly patients with sepsis and measure the effects of this drug on the prevalence of senescent immune cells. We intend that the results of this phase 2 trial will inform the design of a larger phase 3 study.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial is registered to ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT05758246, first posted on March 7, 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"25 1","pages":"698"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11492760/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142475808","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-21DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08561-4
Yuchen Guo, Liang He, Weidong Tong, Zhaocheng Chi, Shuangyi Ren, Binbin Cui, Quan Wang
Introduction: Robotic-assisted complete mesorectal excision (RATME) is increasingly being used by colorectal surgeons. Most surgeons consider RATME a safe method, and believe it can facilitate total mesorectal excision (TME) in rectal cancer, and may potentially have advantages over intersphincteric resection (ISR) and anus preservation. Therefore, this trial was designed to investigate whether RATME has technical advantages and can increase the ISR rate compared with laparoscopic-assisted TME (LATME) in patients with middle and low rectal cancer.
Methods and analysis: This is a multicenter, superiority, randomized controlled trial designed to compare RATME and LATME in middle and low rectal cancer. The primary endpoint is the ISR rate. The secondary endpoints are coloanal anastomosis (CAA) rate, conversion to open surgery, conversion to transanal TME (TaTME), abdominoperineal resection (APR) rate, postoperative morbidity and mortality within 30 days, pathological outcomes, long-term survival outcomes, functional outcomes, and quality of life. In addition, certain measurements will be conducted to ensure quality and safety, including centralized photography review and semiannual assessment.
Discussion: This trial will clarify if RATME improves ISR and promotes anus preservation in patients with mid- and low-rectal cancer. Furthermore, this trial will provide evidence on the optimal treatment strategies for RATME and LATME in patients with mid- and low-rectal cancer regarding improved operational safety.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06105203. Registered on October 27, 2023.
{"title":"A study of intersphincteric resection rate following robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision versus laparoscopic-assisted total mesorectal excision for patients with middle and low rectal cancer: study protocol for a multicenter randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Yuchen Guo, Liang He, Weidong Tong, Zhaocheng Chi, Shuangyi Ren, Binbin Cui, Quan Wang","doi":"10.1186/s13063-024-08561-4","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13063-024-08561-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Robotic-assisted complete mesorectal excision (RATME) is increasingly being used by colorectal surgeons. Most surgeons consider RATME a safe method, and believe it can facilitate total mesorectal excision (TME) in rectal cancer, and may potentially have advantages over intersphincteric resection (ISR) and anus preservation. Therefore, this trial was designed to investigate whether RATME has technical advantages and can increase the ISR rate compared with laparoscopic-assisted TME (LATME) in patients with middle and low rectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>This is a multicenter, superiority, randomized controlled trial designed to compare RATME and LATME in middle and low rectal cancer. The primary endpoint is the ISR rate. The secondary endpoints are coloanal anastomosis (CAA) rate, conversion to open surgery, conversion to transanal TME (TaTME), abdominoperineal resection (APR) rate, postoperative morbidity and mortality within 30 days, pathological outcomes, long-term survival outcomes, functional outcomes, and quality of life. In addition, certain measurements will be conducted to ensure quality and safety, including centralized photography review and semiannual assessment.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This trial will clarify if RATME improves ISR and promotes anus preservation in patients with mid- and low-rectal cancer. Furthermore, this trial will provide evidence on the optimal treatment strategies for RATME and LATME in patients with mid- and low-rectal cancer regarding improved operational safety.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06105203. Registered on October 27, 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"25 1","pages":"703"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11495107/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142475718","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-19DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08557-0
Mariana Bichuette Cartuliares, Eva Kildall Hejbøl, Henrik Daa Schrøder, Andreas Kristian Pedersen, Lars Henrik Frich
Background: Rotator cuff tears (RCT) are a common musculoskeletal condition, especially in the aging population. The prevalence of rotator cuff tears varies based on factors like age, occupation, and activity level. In the general population, the prevalence of rotator cuff tears is estimated to be around 20 to 25%. Rotator cuff tears (RCT) have an impact in patients' pain level, shoulder function, sleep disturbance, and quality of life. Primary tendon surgery is in mostly cases necessary. This study aimed to examine if treatment of rotator cuff lesions with implantation of micro-fragmented adipose tissue can improve patients' reported pain and function compared to conventional surgery.
Methods: The study is a prospective superiority parallel-group single-center randomized controlled trial including 30 patients between 40 and 69 years of age in Denmark. Patients will be allocated 1:1 ratio to reconstruction of the supraspinatus tendon with an injection of micro-fragmented adipose tissue into the related muscle (stem cell treatment) or the standard of care (SOC), which is conventional surgery. Patients, project assistants, physicians, and outcome adjudicators are not blinded to randomization due to practical constraints. The radiologist and the statistician performing the analysis will be blinded. The primary outcome will be the Oxford shoulder score at 12 months post-surgery.
Discussion: This study will assess whether adding micro-fragmented adipose tissue therapy to conventional rotator cuff tear treatment can enhance recovery, accelerate return to daily activities, and improve functional outcomes. The research will also determine if this minimally invasive procedure could be standardized for routine patient care.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06505135. Registered on July 10, 2024.
{"title":"Stem cell treatment for regeneration of the rotator cuff: study protocol for a prospective single-center randomized controlled trial (Lipo-cuff).","authors":"Mariana Bichuette Cartuliares, Eva Kildall Hejbøl, Henrik Daa Schrøder, Andreas Kristian Pedersen, Lars Henrik Frich","doi":"10.1186/s13063-024-08557-0","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13063-024-08557-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rotator cuff tears (RCT) are a common musculoskeletal condition, especially in the aging population. The prevalence of rotator cuff tears varies based on factors like age, occupation, and activity level. In the general population, the prevalence of rotator cuff tears is estimated to be around 20 to 25%. Rotator cuff tears (RCT) have an impact in patients' pain level, shoulder function, sleep disturbance, and quality of life. Primary tendon surgery is in mostly cases necessary. This study aimed to examine if treatment of rotator cuff lesions with implantation of micro-fragmented adipose tissue can improve patients' reported pain and function compared to conventional surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study is a prospective superiority parallel-group single-center randomized controlled trial including 30 patients between 40 and 69 years of age in Denmark. Patients will be allocated 1:1 ratio to reconstruction of the supraspinatus tendon with an injection of micro-fragmented adipose tissue into the related muscle (stem cell treatment) or the standard of care (SOC), which is conventional surgery. Patients, project assistants, physicians, and outcome adjudicators are not blinded to randomization due to practical constraints. The radiologist and the statistician performing the analysis will be blinded. The primary outcome will be the Oxford shoulder score at 12 months post-surgery.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study will assess whether adding micro-fragmented adipose tissue therapy to conventional rotator cuff tear treatment can enhance recovery, accelerate return to daily activities, and improve functional outcomes. The research will also determine if this minimally invasive procedure could be standardized for routine patient care.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06505135. Registered on July 10, 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"25 1","pages":"696"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11492208/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142475809","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}