Pub Date : 2025-07-01Epub Date: 2025-04-28DOI: 10.4046/trd.2024.0137
I Re Heo, Tae Hoon Kim, Won Jai Jung, Gil Myeong Seong, Sun Jung Kwon, Jae Young Moon, Song-I Lee, Do Sik Moon, Tae-Ok Kim, Chul Park, Eun Young Choi, Jung-Wan Yoo, Sunghoon Park, Ae Rin Baek, Sung Yoon Lim, Jung Soo Kim, Jongmin Lee, Chi Ryang Chung, Sang-Min Lee, Su Hwan Lee, Moon Seong Baek, Jin Won Huh, Woo Hyun Cho, Ho Cheol Kim
Background: Understanding of the life-sustaining treatment (LST) decisions in critically ill coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients remains limited. This study aimed to identify factors influencing LST decisions, and compare clinical outcomes between patients with, and without, LST.
Methods: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 1,081 COVID-19 patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) across Korea from January 1, 2020, to August 31, 2021. Patients were divided into LST and non-LST groups. Demographic, clinical, and outcome data were collected and compared.
Results: Of 1,081 patients, 207 (19.2 %) received LST. LST patients were older (median age: 76 years vs. 67 years, p<0.001), and had more comorbidities (85.5% vs. 70.4%, p<0.001), especially cardiovascular and chronic lung disease. They showed higher blood urea nitrogen, lower albumin, and elevated D-dimer levels (all p<0.05). ICU interventions, including mechanical ventilation (82.6% vs. 50.9%, p<0.001) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (18.8% vs. 9.8%, p<0.001), were more common. ICU and hospital mortality rates were significantly higher in LST patients (82.6% and 94.2%, respectively, p<0.001). Logistic regression identified age (odds ratio [OR], 1.054 per year; p<0.001), mechanical ventilation (OR, 2.789; p=0.002), and ECMO use (OR, 3.580; p=0.002) as independent predictors of LST.
Conclusion: Age, comorbidities, and ICU interventions significantly influence LST decisions, highlighting the need for ethical and evidence-based critical care guidelines.
背景:对COVID-19危重患者维持生命治疗(LST)决策的了解仍然有限。本研究旨在确定影响LST决定的因素,并比较LST患者和非LST患者的临床结果。方法:本多中心回顾性队列研究分析了2020年1月1日至2021年8月31日全国1081例新冠肺炎icu患者的数据。患者分为LST组和非LST组。收集并比较人口学、临床和结局数据。结果:1081例患者中,207例(19.2%)接受了LST治疗。LST患者年龄较大(中位年龄:76岁对67岁,p < 0.001),合并症较多(85.5%对70.4%,p < 0.001),特别是心血管和慢性肺部疾病。BUN升高,白蛋白降低,d -二聚体升高(p < 0.05)。ICU干预更常见,包括机械通气(82.6% vs. 50.9%, p < 0.001)和ECMO (18.8% vs. 9.8%, p < 0.001)。LST患者的ICU死亡率和住院死亡率均显著高于LST患者(分别为82.6%和94.2%,p < 0.001)。Logistic回归发现年龄(OR = 1.054 /年,p < 0.001)、机械通气(OR = 2.789, p = 0.002)和ECMO使用(OR = 3.580, p = 0.002)是LST的独立预测因子。结论:年龄、合并症和ICU干预措施显著影响LST的决定,强调了道德和循证重症监护指南的必要性。
{"title":"Determinants of Limiting Life-Sustaining Treatment in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients: A Multicenter Study in Korean Intensive Care Units.","authors":"I Re Heo, Tae Hoon Kim, Won Jai Jung, Gil Myeong Seong, Sun Jung Kwon, Jae Young Moon, Song-I Lee, Do Sik Moon, Tae-Ok Kim, Chul Park, Eun Young Choi, Jung-Wan Yoo, Sunghoon Park, Ae Rin Baek, Sung Yoon Lim, Jung Soo Kim, Jongmin Lee, Chi Ryang Chung, Sang-Min Lee, Su Hwan Lee, Moon Seong Baek, Jin Won Huh, Woo Hyun Cho, Ho Cheol Kim","doi":"10.4046/trd.2024.0137","DOIUrl":"10.4046/trd.2024.0137","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding of the life-sustaining treatment (LST) decisions in critically ill coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients remains limited. This study aimed to identify factors influencing LST decisions, and compare clinical outcomes between patients with, and without, LST.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 1,081 COVID-19 patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) across Korea from January 1, 2020, to August 31, 2021. Patients were divided into LST and non-LST groups. Demographic, clinical, and outcome data were collected and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,081 patients, 207 (19.2 %) received LST. LST patients were older (median age: 76 years vs. 67 years, p<0.001), and had more comorbidities (85.5% vs. 70.4%, p<0.001), especially cardiovascular and chronic lung disease. They showed higher blood urea nitrogen, lower albumin, and elevated D-dimer levels (all p<0.05). ICU interventions, including mechanical ventilation (82.6% vs. 50.9%, p<0.001) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (18.8% vs. 9.8%, p<0.001), were more common. ICU and hospital mortality rates were significantly higher in LST patients (82.6% and 94.2%, respectively, p<0.001). Logistic regression identified age (odds ratio [OR], 1.054 per year; p<0.001), mechanical ventilation (OR, 2.789; p=0.002), and ECMO use (OR, 3.580; p=0.002) as independent predictors of LST.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Age, comorbidities, and ICU interventions significantly influence LST decisions, highlighting the need for ethical and evidence-based critical care guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":23368,"journal":{"name":"Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"557-565"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12235287/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144039621","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01Epub Date: 2025-05-19DOI: 10.4046/trd.2025.0022
Jinsoo Min, Yoolwon Jeong, Hyung Woo Kim, Ju Sang Kim
{"title":"Tuberculosis Notification and Incidence: Republic of Korea, 2023.","authors":"Jinsoo Min, Yoolwon Jeong, Hyung Woo Kim, Ju Sang Kim","doi":"10.4046/trd.2025.0022","DOIUrl":"10.4046/trd.2025.0022","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23368,"journal":{"name":"Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"606-609"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12235280/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144094257","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01Epub Date: 2025-03-20DOI: 10.4046/trd.2024.0177
Chin Kook Rhee
Background: Pelargonium sidoides has been known to be effective in treating respiratory diseases. P. sidoides extract (Umckamin®, Han Wha Pharmaceuticals) was approved in Korea for acute bronchitis. YJP-40 (Umckamin plus®) is formulated with extract of P. sidoides and ivy leaf. Ivy leaf extract has an expectorant effect and has been used to treat bronchitis. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of YJP-40 syrup with Umckamin® syrup in patients with acute bronchitis.
Methods: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, non-inferiority, phase III clinical trial. Patients were randomized 1:1 to either the test (YJP-40) or the control (Umckamin®) group. The primary endpoint was the change in bronchitis severity score (BSS) total score 7 days after administration.
Results: A total of 240 subjects (test group 121; control group 119) from seven hospitals were enrolled in this clinical trial. The average change in BSS total score 7 days after administration compared to before was -4.31±2.09 and -4.36±1.71 in the test group and the control group, respectively. The non-inferiority of the test group to the control group was demonstrated. The response rate at 7 days after administration was 87.16% (95/109) in the test group and 86.92% (93/107) in the control group (p=0.9778). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in the incidence of adverse events.
Conclusion: YJP-40 can be a safe and effective treatment option for acute bronchitis.
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of YJP-40 in Patients with Acute Bronchitis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study.","authors":"Chin Kook Rhee","doi":"10.4046/trd.2024.0177","DOIUrl":"10.4046/trd.2024.0177","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pelargonium sidoides has been known to be effective in treating respiratory diseases. P. sidoides extract (Umckamin®, Han Wha Pharmaceuticals) was approved in Korea for acute bronchitis. YJP-40 (Umckamin plus®) is formulated with extract of P. sidoides and ivy leaf. Ivy leaf extract has an expectorant effect and has been used to treat bronchitis. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of YJP-40 syrup with Umckamin® syrup in patients with acute bronchitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, non-inferiority, phase III clinical trial. Patients were randomized 1:1 to either the test (YJP-40) or the control (Umckamin®) group. The primary endpoint was the change in bronchitis severity score (BSS) total score 7 days after administration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 240 subjects (test group 121; control group 119) from seven hospitals were enrolled in this clinical trial. The average change in BSS total score 7 days after administration compared to before was -4.31±2.09 and -4.36±1.71 in the test group and the control group, respectively. The non-inferiority of the test group to the control group was demonstrated. The response rate at 7 days after administration was 87.16% (95/109) in the test group and 86.92% (93/107) in the control group (p=0.9778). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in the incidence of adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>YJP-40 can be a safe and effective treatment option for acute bronchitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":23368,"journal":{"name":"Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"583-590"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12235283/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143664712","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01Epub Date: 2025-02-27DOI: 10.4046/trd.2024.0178
Won Gun Kwack, Manbong Heo, Yeonseok Choi, Cheon Woong Choi, Byoung Soo Kwon, Yeon Wook Kim, Jong Sun Park, Young-Jae Cho, Jae Ho Lee, Sung Yoon Lim
Background: Pneumothorax is a notable complication of lung biopsy, and its early detection is crucial. This study aimed to compare the sensitivities of handheld portable lung ultrasonography and chest radiography in identifying early pneumothorax post-lung biopsy.
Methods: Upright chest radiography and lung ultrasonography were conducted at 3 and 24 hours following lung biopsy. The disappearance of lung sliding and the appearance of lung points on lung ultrasonography were indicative of pneumothorax.
Results: In this study of 86 patients, 23 were diagnosed with pneumothorax within 24 hours post-biopsy. No significant differences in sex, age, or baseline lung function were noted between the pneumothorax and non-pneumothorax groups. The sensitivities of lung ultrasonography and chest radiography for detecting pneumothorax were 73.9% and 47.8%, respectively, at 3 hours and 91.3% and 78.3%, respectively, at 24 hours. Additionally, at 3 hours, the area under the curve for lung ultrasonography in diagnosing pneumothorax was significantly higher than that for chest radiography (0.870 vs. 0.739, p=0.043); however, the difference was not significant at 24 hours (p=0.254).
Conclusion: These preliminary findings indicate that lung ultrasonography is more sensitive than chest radiography in detecting early pneumothorax following lung biopsy and could be beneficial for rapid pneumothorax diagnosis.
背景:气胸是肺活检的重要并发症,早期发现至关重要。本研究旨在比较手持式便携式肺超声检查与胸片检查对肺活检后早期气胸的敏感性。方法:在肺活检后3、24小时分别行直立胸片和肺超声检查。肺滑动消失,肺点出现,超声检查认为是气胸的证据。结果:在本研究的86例患者中,23例在活检24小时内被诊断为气胸。气胸组和非气胸组在性别、年龄或基线肺功能方面没有显著差异。肺超声和胸片检查气胸3小时的灵敏度分别为73.9%和47.8%,24小时的灵敏度分别为91.3%和78.3%。3 h时,肺超声诊断气胸曲线下面积明显高于胸片(0.870 vs. 0.739, p = 0.043);但在24小时时,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.254)。结论:肺部超声检查对肺活检后早期气胸的发现比胸片检查更敏感,有利于气胸的快速诊断。
{"title":"Efficacy of Portable Ultrasonography for Early Detection of Pneumothorax Following Lung Biopsy.","authors":"Won Gun Kwack, Manbong Heo, Yeonseok Choi, Cheon Woong Choi, Byoung Soo Kwon, Yeon Wook Kim, Jong Sun Park, Young-Jae Cho, Jae Ho Lee, Sung Yoon Lim","doi":"10.4046/trd.2024.0178","DOIUrl":"10.4046/trd.2024.0178","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pneumothorax is a notable complication of lung biopsy, and its early detection is crucial. This study aimed to compare the sensitivities of handheld portable lung ultrasonography and chest radiography in identifying early pneumothorax post-lung biopsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Upright chest radiography and lung ultrasonography were conducted at 3 and 24 hours following lung biopsy. The disappearance of lung sliding and the appearance of lung points on lung ultrasonography were indicative of pneumothorax.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study of 86 patients, 23 were diagnosed with pneumothorax within 24 hours post-biopsy. No significant differences in sex, age, or baseline lung function were noted between the pneumothorax and non-pneumothorax groups. The sensitivities of lung ultrasonography and chest radiography for detecting pneumothorax were 73.9% and 47.8%, respectively, at 3 hours and 91.3% and 78.3%, respectively, at 24 hours. Additionally, at 3 hours, the area under the curve for lung ultrasonography in diagnosing pneumothorax was significantly higher than that for chest radiography (0.870 vs. 0.739, p=0.043); however, the difference was not significant at 24 hours (p=0.254).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These preliminary findings indicate that lung ultrasonography is more sensitive than chest radiography in detecting early pneumothorax following lung biopsy and could be beneficial for rapid pneumothorax diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":23368,"journal":{"name":"Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"575-582"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12235288/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143524493","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01Epub Date: 2025-04-01DOI: 10.4046/trd.2024.0202
Eun Joo Lee, Yangjin Jegal, Dong Won Park, Jimyung Park, Jun-Pyo Myong, Ji-Hyun Lee, Bo Hyoung Kang
Sarcoidosis is a granulomatous inflammatory disease of unknown etiology that can affect the entire body, but its respiratory tract involvement is most common. In radiological findings, bilateral hilar and mediastinal lymph node enlargement is the most common finding, and when lung parenchyma is involved, findings such as micronodules, ground-glass shadows, reticular shadows, and fibrosis are seen. Biopsies for histological diagnosis are mainly performed on lymph nodes or lungs, and mediastinal lymph node biopsies are done via endobronchochial ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. Pathological findings are characterized by non-caseating, non-necrotizing granulomas, and in Korea, differentiation from tuberculosis is especially important. The natural history of sarcoidosis is very variable, with approximately two-thirds of subjects showing spontaneous remission and only 10% to 30% of patients showing a chronic or progressive form. The most important factor in determining treatment for sarcoidosis is whether there is a risk of death, organ failure, or loss of quality of life. Glucocorticosteroids are the mainstay of treatment, and if the disease progresses despite treatment, or if glucocorticosteroids cannot be reduced or cannot be used, immunosuppressants such as methotrexate and azathioprine can be considered. Response to glucocorticosteroids treatment is good, and most of the patients stabilize or improve, with a low mortality rate of around 3% to 5%.
{"title":"Korean Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Interstitial Lung Diseases: Sarcoidosis.","authors":"Eun Joo Lee, Yangjin Jegal, Dong Won Park, Jimyung Park, Jun-Pyo Myong, Ji-Hyun Lee, Bo Hyoung Kang","doi":"10.4046/trd.2024.0202","DOIUrl":"10.4046/trd.2024.0202","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sarcoidosis is a granulomatous inflammatory disease of unknown etiology that can affect the entire body, but its respiratory tract involvement is most common. In radiological findings, bilateral hilar and mediastinal lymph node enlargement is the most common finding, and when lung parenchyma is involved, findings such as micronodules, ground-glass shadows, reticular shadows, and fibrosis are seen. Biopsies for histological diagnosis are mainly performed on lymph nodes or lungs, and mediastinal lymph node biopsies are done via endobronchochial ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. Pathological findings are characterized by non-caseating, non-necrotizing granulomas, and in Korea, differentiation from tuberculosis is especially important. The natural history of sarcoidosis is very variable, with approximately two-thirds of subjects showing spontaneous remission and only 10% to 30% of patients showing a chronic or progressive form. The most important factor in determining treatment for sarcoidosis is whether there is a risk of death, organ failure, or loss of quality of life. Glucocorticosteroids are the mainstay of treatment, and if the disease progresses despite treatment, or if glucocorticosteroids cannot be reduced or cannot be used, immunosuppressants such as methotrexate and azathioprine can be considered. Response to glucocorticosteroids treatment is good, and most of the patients stabilize or improve, with a low mortality rate of around 3% to 5%.</p>","PeriodicalId":23368,"journal":{"name":"Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"488-503"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12235296/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143754685","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01Epub Date: 2025-03-25DOI: 10.4046/trd.2025.0009
Sang Hyuk Kim, MeiLan K Han
In the field of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), there is growing interest in methods for early detection with the goal of altering disease progression. At the same time, pulmonary function test (PFT) remains central to the diagnosis and management of COPD. Yet, spirometry remains underused, particularly in primary care, contributing to the underdiagnosis and misdiagnosis of COPD. Challenges hindering more aggressive use of spirometry include a lack of access in primary care clinics or public venues, the complexity of performing spirometry and a lack of comfort with interpretation. Enhancing PFT utilization will require new approaches including broadening availability and adopting different approaches to interpretation.
{"title":"Challenges and the Future of Pulmonary Function Testing in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): Toward Earlier Diagnosis of COPD.","authors":"Sang Hyuk Kim, MeiLan K Han","doi":"10.4046/trd.2025.0009","DOIUrl":"10.4046/trd.2025.0009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the field of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), there is growing interest in methods for early detection with the goal of altering disease progression. At the same time, pulmonary function test (PFT) remains central to the diagnosis and management of COPD. Yet, spirometry remains underused, particularly in primary care, contributing to the underdiagnosis and misdiagnosis of COPD. Challenges hindering more aggressive use of spirometry include a lack of access in primary care clinics or public venues, the complexity of performing spirometry and a lack of comfort with interpretation. Enhancing PFT utilization will require new approaches including broadening availability and adopting different approaches to interpretation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23368,"journal":{"name":"Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"413-418"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12235289/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143701688","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01Epub Date: 2025-04-15DOI: 10.4046/trd.2025.0034
Youlim Kim, Jong Geol Jang, Tai Joon An, Joon Young Choi, Chin Kook Rhee, Kyung Hoon Min, Yong Il Hwang
{"title":"Enhancing Asthma Management: Key Insights from the 10th Asthma Quality Assessment Program.","authors":"Youlim Kim, Jong Geol Jang, Tai Joon An, Joon Young Choi, Chin Kook Rhee, Kyung Hoon Min, Yong Il Hwang","doi":"10.4046/trd.2025.0034","DOIUrl":"10.4046/trd.2025.0034","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23368,"journal":{"name":"Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"599-602"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12235282/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144043973","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01Epub Date: 2025-02-27DOI: 10.4046/trd.2024.0182
Sang Hyuk Kim, Hyun Lee, Min Ji Kim, Min Gu Kang, Jong Seung Kim, Jong Geol Jang, Youlim Kim, Hyeon-Kyoung Koo, Chin Kook Rhee, Kyung Hoon Min, Yong Il Hwang, Deog Kyeom Kim, Yong Bum Park, Ji-Yong Moon
Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination may offer benefits for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, the evidence on whether the vaccination decreases the frequency of acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) is limited.
Methods: This study enrolled 41,606 individuals diagnosed with COPD using the Korean National Health Insurance System-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (NHIS SARS-CoV-2) database between 2020 and 2021. A cohort of 3,602 individuals was analyzed through 1:1 propensity score matching of vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. The risk of AECOPD was evaluated using a Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. A post hoc analysis examined the impact of COVID-19 on AECOPD in vaccinated and unvaccinated groups among infected and uninfected subgroups.
Results: Throughout the study, the exacerbation rate was lower in the vaccinated group (1,683/10,000 person-years) compared to the unvaccinated group (3,410/10,000 personyears). The Cox proportional hazards model showed a significantly decreased risk of AECOPD in vaccinated individuals relative to unvaccinated individuals (hazard ratio [HR], 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41 to 0.72). post hoc analysis revealed that COVID-19 was associated with a higher risk of AECOPD in unvaccinated individuals (adjusted HR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.28 to 3.33), while in vaccinated individuals, the risk did not significantly differ between those infected and not infected with COVID-19 (adjusted HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.42 to 4.36).
Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccination appears to decrease the risk of AECOPD among individuals with COPD.
{"title":"Effects of Vaccination on Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.","authors":"Sang Hyuk Kim, Hyun Lee, Min Ji Kim, Min Gu Kang, Jong Seung Kim, Jong Geol Jang, Youlim Kim, Hyeon-Kyoung Koo, Chin Kook Rhee, Kyung Hoon Min, Yong Il Hwang, Deog Kyeom Kim, Yong Bum Park, Ji-Yong Moon","doi":"10.4046/trd.2024.0182","DOIUrl":"10.4046/trd.2024.0182","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination may offer benefits for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, the evidence on whether the vaccination decreases the frequency of acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) is limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study enrolled 41,606 individuals diagnosed with COPD using the Korean National Health Insurance System-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (NHIS SARS-CoV-2) database between 2020 and 2021. A cohort of 3,602 individuals was analyzed through 1:1 propensity score matching of vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. The risk of AECOPD was evaluated using a Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. A post hoc analysis examined the impact of COVID-19 on AECOPD in vaccinated and unvaccinated groups among infected and uninfected subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Throughout the study, the exacerbation rate was lower in the vaccinated group (1,683/10,000 person-years) compared to the unvaccinated group (3,410/10,000 personyears). The Cox proportional hazards model showed a significantly decreased risk of AECOPD in vaccinated individuals relative to unvaccinated individuals (hazard ratio [HR], 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41 to 0.72). post hoc analysis revealed that COVID-19 was associated with a higher risk of AECOPD in unvaccinated individuals (adjusted HR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.28 to 3.33), while in vaccinated individuals, the risk did not significantly differ between those infected and not infected with COVID-19 (adjusted HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.42 to 4.36).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>COVID-19 vaccination appears to decrease the risk of AECOPD among individuals with COPD.</p>","PeriodicalId":23368,"journal":{"name":"Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"526-534"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12235290/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143524492","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01Epub Date: 2025-03-26DOI: 10.4046/trd.2024.0159
Hidenori Kage
Advances in targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors have significantly enhanced survival rates for patients diagnosed with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In non-metastatic NSCLC, adding immune checkpoint inhibitors postchemoradiotherapy has led to improved outcomes in stage III disease and during the perioperative period for stages IB-IIIA. Recently, adjuvant osimertinib and alectinib therapy have demonstrated improved survival rates for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) alterations, respectively; these therapies are now considered standard treatments. Additionally, osimertinib has shown efficacy when administered postchemoradiotherapy in stage III NSCLC. These findings emphasize the importance of assessing EGFR and ALK status to accurately guide treatment decisions for nearly all NSCLC patients, whether they are undergoing curative surgery, chemoradiotherapy, or receiving palliative chemotherapy. This review summarizes recent trials on perioperative and postchemoradiation therapy and advocates for the necessity of molecular testing in non-metastatic NSCLC to enhance patient outcomes.
{"title":"Emerging Role of Molecular Testing in the Management of Non-metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.","authors":"Hidenori Kage","doi":"10.4046/trd.2024.0159","DOIUrl":"10.4046/trd.2024.0159","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advances in targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors have significantly enhanced survival rates for patients diagnosed with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In non-metastatic NSCLC, adding immune checkpoint inhibitors postchemoradiotherapy has led to improved outcomes in stage III disease and during the perioperative period for stages IB-IIIA. Recently, adjuvant osimertinib and alectinib therapy have demonstrated improved survival rates for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) alterations, respectively; these therapies are now considered standard treatments. Additionally, osimertinib has shown efficacy when administered postchemoradiotherapy in stage III NSCLC. These findings emphasize the importance of assessing EGFR and ALK status to accurately guide treatment decisions for nearly all NSCLC patients, whether they are undergoing curative surgery, chemoradiotherapy, or receiving palliative chemotherapy. This review summarizes recent trials on perioperative and postchemoradiation therapy and advocates for the necessity of molecular testing in non-metastatic NSCLC to enhance patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23368,"journal":{"name":"Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"431-441"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12235291/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143711014","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01Epub Date: 2025-05-19DOI: 10.4046/trd.2025.0020
Kang-Mo Gu, Jinsoo Min
Background: Tuberculosis (TB) care quality assessment has been implemented in the Republic of Korea since 2018. This paper evaluates the results of six rounds of the quality assessment from 2018 to 2023, focusing on the sixth quality assessment in 2023.
Methods: This study used cross-linked databases from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, and the Ministry of the Interior and Safety. The study population included newly diagnosed TB patients reported between January and June each year from 2016 to 2023. The sixth quality assessment employed five indicators, which included the treatment success rate. Trends were analyzed using linear regression, and statistical comparisons were performed using chi-square tests.
Results: The sixth quality assessment demonstrated statistically significant improvements across all indicators. Since the fifth assessment, over 95% of patients diagnosed with respiratory TB have undergone TB confirmation tests. Both phenotype and molecular drug susceptibility test coverages showed significant upward trends since the third and fourth assessments, respectively. The treatment success rate, introduced for the first time in the sixth assessment, was reported at 78.3%. Non-TB-related deaths (10.3%) were the most common outcome, other than treatment success.
Conclusion: The TB care quality assessment has contributed to standardizing TB care in Korea and improving management indicators. Further efforts are needed to enhance treatment success through refining the evaluation criteria and implementing innovative management strategies.
{"title":"Tuberculosis Care Quality Assessment: Evaluating Diagnosis and Treatment Effectiveness in Korea, 2018 to 2022.","authors":"Kang-Mo Gu, Jinsoo Min","doi":"10.4046/trd.2025.0020","DOIUrl":"10.4046/trd.2025.0020","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tuberculosis (TB) care quality assessment has been implemented in the Republic of Korea since 2018. This paper evaluates the results of six rounds of the quality assessment from 2018 to 2023, focusing on the sixth quality assessment in 2023.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used cross-linked databases from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, and the Ministry of the Interior and Safety. The study population included newly diagnosed TB patients reported between January and June each year from 2016 to 2023. The sixth quality assessment employed five indicators, which included the treatment success rate. Trends were analyzed using linear regression, and statistical comparisons were performed using chi-square tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sixth quality assessment demonstrated statistically significant improvements across all indicators. Since the fifth assessment, over 95% of patients diagnosed with respiratory TB have undergone TB confirmation tests. Both phenotype and molecular drug susceptibility test coverages showed significant upward trends since the third and fourth assessments, respectively. The treatment success rate, introduced for the first time in the sixth assessment, was reported at 78.3%. Non-TB-related deaths (10.3%) were the most common outcome, other than treatment success.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The TB care quality assessment has contributed to standardizing TB care in Korea and improving management indicators. Further efforts are needed to enhance treatment success through refining the evaluation criteria and implementing innovative management strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23368,"journal":{"name":"Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"566-574"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12235286/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144102109","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}