Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations最新文献

Objectives

We sought to determine whether bladder cuff excision and its technique influence outcomes after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).

Methods and materials

A multicenter, international, retrospective analysis using the ROBotic surgery for Upper tract Urothelial cancer Study (ROBUUST) 2.0 registry identified 1,718 patients undergoing RNU for UTUC between 2015 and 2023 at 17 centers across the United States, Europe, and Asia. Data was gathered on (1) whether bladder cuff excision was performed and (2) what technique was used, including formal excision or other techniques (pluck technique, stripping/intussusception technique) and outcomes. Multivariate and survival analyses were performed to compare the groups.

Results

Most patients (90%, 1,540/1,718) underwent formal bladder cuff excision in accordance with EAU and AUA guidelines. Only 4% (68/1,718) underwent resection using other techniques, and 6% (110/1,718) did not have a bladder cuff excised. Median follow up for the cohort was 24 months (IQR 9–44). When comparing formal bladder cuff excision to other excision techniques, there were no differences in oncologic or survival outcomes including bladder recurrence-free survival (BRFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), overall survival (OS), or cancer-specific survival (CSS). However, excision of any kind conferred a decreased risk of bladder-specific recurrence compared to no excision. There was no difference in RFS, MFS, OS, or CSS when comparing bladder cuff excision, other techniques, and no excision.

Conclusions

Bladder cuff excision improves recurrence-free survival, particularly when considering bladder recurrence. This benefit is conferred regardless of technique, as long as the intramural ureter and ureteral orifice are excised. However, the benefit of bladder cuff excision on metastasis-free, overall, and cancer-specific survival is unclear.

Metastatic urothelial carcinoma (muC) has historically had few effective therapeutic options. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), were introduced as therapeutic options for cisplatin-ineligible patients, however, direct head-to-head trials comparing these treatments are lacking. To address this gap, this study employs a Bayesian framework to indirectly compare the performance of ICIs as first-line agents for muC. A systematic review was performed to identify randomized controlled trials evaluating different ICI for mUC. Data was inputted into Review Manager 5.4 for pairwise meta-analysis. Data was then used to build a network in R Studio. These networks were used to model 200,000 Markov Chains via MonteCarlo sampling. The results are expressed as hazard ratios (HR) with 95% credible intervals (CrI). Six studies with 5,449 patients were included, 3,255 received ICI monotherapy or combination. Moreover, a total of 3,006 had PD-L1 positive tumors and 2,362 were PD-L1 negative. Median overall survival (OS) ranged from 12.1 to 31.5 months across the studies, with the combination of enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab demonstrating the most substantial reduction in the risk of death (HR 0.47 [95% CrI: 0.38, 0.58]), followed by avelumab monotherapy (HR 0.69 [95% CrI: 0.56, 0.86]). The limitations of this network meta-analysis include variability in study follow-up duration, lack of standardized methods for assessing PD-L1 positivity, and potential bias introduced by control arms with poorer survival outcomes across included trials. The enfortumab vedotin/pembrolizumab combination significantly improved survival and response rates. Avelumab showed notable single-agent activity. These findings provide a valuable framework to guide clinical decision-making and highlight priority areas for future research, including biomarker refinement and novel combination strategies to enhance antitumor immunity in this challenging malignancy.

Purpose

Cancer statistics demonstrate leading growth of prostate cancer. As a rule, radical prostatectomy (RP) is a mandatory option in the treatment of localized prostate cancer (PCa). Over 30% of patients develop biochemical resistance after the surgery and over 30% of these patients experience prostate cancer recurrence and metastasis. Currently used PCa patient's diagnostic features fail to identify PCa recurrence. To identify the risk group of PCa patients after RP we attempt to apply miRNAs which were shown as promising liquid biopsy markers for PCa diagnosis and prognosis.

Materials and methods

Expression of 14 miRNAs closely involved in the development of prostate cancer from urine extracellular vesicles (uEV) of PCa patients before as well as 3, 6 and 12 months after radical prostatectomy was assessed using RT PCR and compared with their expression from uEV of healthy donors in the current study.

Results

It was shown that 22 miRNA pairs prognostic ratios (MPPRs) significantly changed after radical prostatectomy. MPPRs the most promising in terms of evaluating the effectiveness of radical prostatectomy have been identified. These include two groups: MPPRs significantly changed after surgery towards that in healthy donors; and MPPRs, which divided PCa patients into two significantly different subgroups 3 or 6 months after radical prostatectomy.

Conclusions

The obtained data indicate that urine EVs represent a valuable source of both MPDR and MPPR for prostate cancer.

Purposes

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Objective

In recently published phase III trials, overall survival (OS) differences were demonstrated in patients with secondary vs. De Novo and low vs. high volume metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). We hypothesized that these factors may also be attributable in real-world setting of new intensified combination therapies and in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients.

Materials and methods

We relied on an institutional tertiary-care database to identify mHSPC and subsequent mCRPC patients. The main outcome consisted of time to mCRPC and OS. Patients were stratified according to De Novo vs. secondary and low vs. high volume mHSPC and mCRPC, respectively.

Results

Of 504 mHSPC patients, 371 (73.6%) were De Novo vs. 133 (26.4%) secondary mHSPC. Patients with De Novo and high volume mHSPC harbored shorter time to mCRPC and OS than secondary and low volume mHSPC patients (both P < 0.01). After stratification regarding disease volume, median time to mCRPC differed significantly between De Novo high volume (DNHV) vs. De Novo low volume (DNLV) vs. secondary high volume (SecHV) vs. secondary low volume mHSPC patients (SecLV, P < 0.001). Similarly in OS analyses, median OS was 44 vs. 53 vs. 88 vs. 120 months for respectively DNHV vs. SecHV vs. SecLV vs. DNLV mHSPC (P < 0.001). After progression to mCRPC, the effect of onset of metastatic disease and metastatic volume was still observed (all P < 0.01).

Conclusion

Patients with DNHV mHSPC harbor worse prognosis in a real world setting and in the light of combination therapies. This effect is also discernible in the context of mCRPC.

Introduction

Opioid dependence represents a public health crisis and can be observed after outpatient urologic procedures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk of persistent opioid usage after radical orchiectomy for testicular cancer.

Materials and methods

The TriNetX Research network database was queried for men between 15 and 45 years undergoing radical orchiectomy for a diagnosis of testicular cancer. All patients with N+ or M+ disease, prior opioid use, and patients who underwent chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or retroperitoneal lymph node dissection were excluded. Patients were stratified whether they were prescribed opioids or not at time of orchiectomy. The incidence of new, persistent opioid use, defined as a prescription for opioids between 3 and 15 months after orchiectomy, was evaluated.

Results

A total of 2,911 men underwent radical orchiectomy for testicular cancer, of which 89.8% were prescribed opioids at time of orchiectomy. After propensity score matching for age, race, and history of psychiatric diagnosis, 592 patients were included (296 received opioids, 296 did not). Overall, 0% of patients who did not receive postoperative opioids developed new persistent opioid use, whereas 10.5% of patients who received postoperative opioids developed new persistent opioid use. Patients prescribed postoperative opioids for orchiectomy had statistically higher risk difference of developing new persistent opioid use (Risk Difference: 10.5%; 95% CI: 7.0-14.0; Z: 5.7; P < 0.01).

Conclusions

Postoperative opioid prescription following radical orchiectomy is significantly associated with developing new persistent opioid use, with 1 in 10 young men who received postoperative opioids obtaining a new prescription for opioids well beyond the postoperative period. Future efforts should emphasize nonopioid pathways for pain control following this generally minor procedure.

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion