Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie最新文献

Background: Adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD) is a rare autoinflammatory disease. Since it can lead to variable organ involvement, including life-threatening complications, and due to newly available therapeutic approaches, the German Society for Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie und klinische Immunologie; DGRh) issued a newly developed S2e guideline in December 2022.

Objective: This study aims to investigate the influence of the new guideline on the diagnosis, management, and outcomes of AOSD.

Methods: Retrospective data from 168 patients diagnosed with AOSD between 2007 and 2023 (92 women and 76 men; average age 40.39 years) were captured at nine centers in Germany. Patient characteristics; results of laboratory, physical, and instrumental examinations; and therapeutic regimens were analyzed at three different timepoints.

Results: After publication of the German AOSD guideline, the time to diagnosis was shorter (mean before: 18.56 months, mean after: 1.29 months) and fewer complications were recorded, especially with respect to macrophage activation syndrome. Although therapeutic approaches did not change over time, treatment side effects were lower in the recent observation periods. Of note, more patients have been diagnosed with cardiac (19% to 23.1%) and pulmonary (13.8% to 23.1%) manifestations of AOSD in recent years.

Conclusion: The new AOSD guideline has contributed to increased disease awareness, with earlier diagnosis and identification of extra-articular organ manifestations. Treatment side effects were less frequent, especially those related to glucocorticoids. However, there is still a need to further improve the management of AOSD.

Background: The adaptation of structures and processes in treatment procedures can contribute to increasing patient satisfaction and is the focus of patient-oriented quality assurance.

Objective: To identify patient satisfaction as well as needs, expectations and preferences with respect to care and, based on this, to formulate recommendations for action to optimize the quality of care at a large tertiary rheumatology center.

Material and methods: As part of a qualitative research approach, semi-structured patient interviews and a focus group interview consisting of physicians in rheumatology training in outpatient specialist care were conducted. The quality dimensions of Donabedian were recorded. The data material was evaluated and analyzed using the content-structuring qualitative content analysis according to Kuckartz with the MAXQDA evaluation software.

Results: Using 12 patient interviews and a focus group of 3 future rheumatologists, recommendations for action to optimize the quality of care were derived on the basis of the structural, process and outcome quality. There was a need for optimization in the areas of personnel management, internal practice processes, practice equipment and treatment processes in the outpatient clinic.

Conclusion: The results from the patient interviews and the focus group revealed the aspects in need of optimization. The methodology and results of this study can serve as a reference point for analyses of other rheumatology clinics in order to improve the quality of care within the framework of patient-oriented quality management and continuous further development.

Burnout among rheumatologists is globally prevalent, driven by low personal accomplishment, younger age, dissatisfaction with the specialty, low income, long hours, emotional exhaustion, and depersonalization. Mitigation strategies include addressing modifiable risk factors, implementing organizational measures, investing in well-being, assessing individual grit, and managing workload with virtual care platforms.

Background: Vaccinations represent an easily accessible, safe, and important method for preventing infections. Patients with primary immunodeficiencies (PID) are more susceptible to infections and should receive an extended spectrum of immunizations in many countries.

Methods: Between January 2019 and May 2020, vaccination certificates of 70 patients with PID from the regions of Würzburg and Hanover in Germany were evaluated. The patients were additionally surveyed regarding their attitude towards vaccinations and the communication with their physicians. Medical records were analyzed.

Results: Of the 70 patients, 54 (77%) suffered from common variable immunodeficiency, 30 (43%) were diagnosed with accompanying autoimmunity, 62 (89%) had an increased susceptibility to infections, and 56 (80%) were on immunoglobulin substitution therapy. Seven patients (10%) had neither a vaccination certificate nor were they able to recollect of their last vaccination. Only 55 (79%) and 43 (61%) patients stated that their rheumatologist or immunologist had recommended an influenza and a pneumococcal vaccination, respectively. When asked about their overall trust in vaccinations on a scale of 0 to 10 (0 = very low, 10 = very high), the mean value was 7.8. The most common vaccination was against tetanus in 63 (90%) patients, 49 (70%) had received vaccination against pneumococci, and 39 (56%) had received an influenza vaccination. Interestingly, 26 patients (37%) were vaccinated against measles, even though this is contraindicated in most PID patients.

Conclusion: Our data suggest that vaccination rates in this at-risk population are insufficient. Healthcare providers should emphasize vaccinations routinely when caring for these patients.

Introduction: Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is a complex condition that is often refractory to therapy and is associated with impaired quality of life. In some studies, multimodal rheumatological treatment has been shown to be an effective therapy option for patients with systemic-inflammatory and degenerative rheumatic diseases. However, the effects of this therapeutic approach have not been sufficiently investigated in patients with FMS. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the effect of a concise 9‑ to 10-day inpatient multimodal fibromyalgia treatment (MFT) using patient-reported outcomes in a German cohort.

Methods: The effects of MFT were assessed using visual analog scales (VAS) for pain (P) and subjective disease activity (DA), questionnaires measuring everyday functional capacity (Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ], Funktions-Fragebogen-Hannover [FFbH, Hannover Functional Ability Questionnaire]), and pharmacotherapy at three time points (Visit 1: beginning of multimodal therapy, Visit 2: end of MFT, and Visit 3: 3 months after Visit 2).

Results: Sixty-one patients were enrolled in the study at the Rhineland-Palatinate Acute Rheumatology Center. Under MFT, a significant improvement in VAS (P) and VAS (DA) was observed between the start and end of treatment (Visit 2 versus Visit 1: median decrease from 7 to 5, p < 0.001, for both VAS [P] and VAS [DA]). Additionally, comparison of the other two assessment points showed a change in VAS (P) (Visit 3 versus Visit 1: median decrease from 7 to 6, p = 0.041, and Visit 3 versus Visit 2: median increase from 5 to 6, p = 0.004). However, there were no significant differences in FFbH and HAQ parameters among the three visits. Examination of the subgroup of patients whose medication therapy was not intensified during hospitalization also showed significant improvements in VAS (P) and VAS (DA) between the start and end of MFB (Visit 2 versus Visit 1: median decrease from 7 to 4, p < 0.001, for VAS [P] and median decrease from 6.25 to 4, p = 0.002, for VAS [DA]).

Conclusion: These findings indicate a demonstrable benefit to patients of MFT regarding both pain and subjective disease activity. Furthermore, pain relief was even observed 3 months after the end of therapy. This shows the high value of this therapeutic approach to treating patients with FMS.

The model advanced training regulations define the content of advanced training to achieve the qualification of medical specialist in internal medicine and rheumatology. There are currently no criteria for issuing the authorization in advanced training. This position paper describes the criteria proposed by the German Society for Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology (DGRh), which should be the foundation for the issuance of authorization for advanced training in the field of internal medicine and rheumatology and for the assessment of the duration. The model advanced training regulations 2018 and the advanced training plan recommended by experts function as the basis for this. Based on the criteria, the authorization for advanced training to advanced specialist training in internal medicine and rheumatology can be allocated in a standardized, graded and transparent manner throughout Germany. This enables an optimal quality of advanced training in rheumatology, which can be adapted to the future developments in the discipline.