The modern settlements of El-Matariya and Ain Shams are located to the north-east of Cairo, now covering the cemetery of Heliopolis. This necropolis contained many tombs from the Old Kingdom, or even before, which continued to be in use through the Late Period (7th–4th centuries BC). Heliopolis is considered one of the oldest religious cities in the history of ancient Egypt, which has not been systematically and fully excavated. During the rescue excavations of Ard Neqabet El-Muhamin in Ain-Shams East (Heliopolis) in 1987–8, many objects were found. They come from different periods, have different shapes and have been made from different materials. The aim of this research is to study in detail the objects, which stem from the excavations of Ard Neqabet El-Muhamin at Heliopolis which they are kept in El-Matariya’s storerooms and Grand Egyptian Museum, which have not been published completely. These objects have a lot of archaeological information, which need to be published in scientific research, to help date these artifacts and cast light on them. تقع منطقه المطرية وعين شمس الحالية شمال شرق القاهرة، فوق جبانة هليوبوليس. احتوت هذه الجبانة على العديد من المقابر من عصر الدولة القديمة، والتي استمرت في الاستخدام خلال الفترة المتأخرة. تعتبر هليوبوليس واحدة من أقدم المدن الدينية في تاريخ مصر القديمة، والتي لم يتم التنقيب عنها بشكل منهجي وكامل. أثناء حفائر الإنقاذ في أرض نقابة المحامين في عين شمس الشرقية (هليوبوليس) تم العثور على العديد من اللقى الأثرية من فترات زمنيه مختلفة. الهدف من هذا البحث هو الدراسة التفصيلية لهذه لقطع والتي تم حفظها في مخازن المطرية والمتحف المصري الكبير، والتي لم يتم نشرها من قبل، حيث تحتوي هذه اللقى على الكثير من المعلومات الأثرية، والتي يجب نشرها في بحث علمي، للمساعدة في تحديد تاريخ هذه القطع الأثرية وإلقاء الضوء عليه.
{"title":"Heliopolis, Funde aus der Nekropole von Ard Neqabet El-Muhamin (1987–88)","authors":"Abdelghaffar Wagdy","doi":"10.1515/zaes-2021-0025","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zaes-2021-0025","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 The modern settlements of El-Matariya and Ain Shams are located to the north-east of Cairo, now covering the cemetery of Heliopolis. This necropolis contained many tombs from the Old Kingdom, or even before, which continued to be in use through the Late Period (7th–4th centuries BC). Heliopolis is considered one of the oldest religious cities in the history of ancient Egypt, which has not been systematically and fully excavated. During the rescue excavations of Ard Neqabet El-Muhamin in Ain-Shams East (Heliopolis) in 1987–8, many objects were found. They come from different periods, have different shapes and have been made from different materials. The aim of this research is to study in detail the objects, which stem from the excavations of Ard Neqabet El-Muhamin at Heliopolis which they are kept in El-Matariya’s storerooms and Grand Egyptian Museum, which have not been published completely. These objects have a lot of archaeological information, which need to be published in scientific research, to help date these artifacts and cast light on them.\u0000 \u0000 تقع منطقه المطرية وعين شمس الحالية شمال شرق القاهرة، فوق جبانة هليوبوليس. احتوت هذه الجبانة على العديد من المقابر من عصر الدولة القديمة، والتي استمرت في الاستخدام خلال الفترة المتأخرة. تعتبر هليوبوليس واحدة من أقدم المدن الدينية في تاريخ مصر القديمة، والتي لم يتم التنقيب عنها بشكل منهجي وكامل. أثناء حفائر الإنقاذ في أرض نقابة المحامين في عين شمس الشرقية (هليوبوليس) تم العثور على العديد من اللقى الأثرية من فترات زمنيه مختلفة. الهدف من هذا البحث هو الدراسة التفصيلية لهذه لقطع والتي تم حفظها في مخازن المطرية والمتحف المصري الكبير، والتي لم يتم نشرها من قبل، حيث تحتوي هذه اللقى على الكثير من المعلومات الأثرية، والتي يجب نشرها في بحث علمي، للمساعدة في تحديد تاريخ هذه القطع الأثرية وإلقاء الضوء عليه.","PeriodicalId":23873,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für Ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde","volume":"50 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141102217","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper is conceived as a first step towards the Kemyt (re)contextualization. By exploring the specific layout and paratext of Kemyt, it intends to shed light on the scribes who wrote the many partial copies of this letter-like composition and in which circumstances. I first address the layout, the ink choices, and the writing orientation. I then turn my attention to the text structure: dividers, ending marks, as well as colophons, dedications, and underwriting. The dated ostraca and their frequent identification as school exercises are discussed before moving on to the textual revision practices and looking for an explanation to the low proportion of corrected texts despite faulty content. All this enabled me to highlight a set of scribal practices, in which scribes draw, some being proper to the Kemyt, some being common to the rest of the text production. These practices revealed a complex network, from beginning students to senior scribes, through assistant scribes and early career scribes, which contributed to the crafting and the transmission of scribal knowledge during the New Kingdom.
{"title":"Learning Through Practice: On How Kemyt Contributed to Crafting and Transmitting Scribal Knowledge","authors":"Aurore Motte","doi":"10.1515/zaes-2022-0005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zaes-2022-0005","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 This paper is conceived as a first step towards the Kemyt (re)contextualization. By exploring the specific layout and paratext of Kemyt, it intends to shed light on the scribes who wrote the many partial copies of this letter-like composition and in which circumstances. I first address the layout, the ink choices, and the writing orientation. I then turn my attention to the text structure: dividers, ending marks, as well as colophons, dedications, and underwriting. The dated ostraca and their frequent identification as school exercises are discussed before moving on to the textual revision practices and looking for an explanation to the low proportion of corrected texts despite faulty content. All this enabled me to highlight a set of scribal practices, in which scribes draw, some being proper to the Kemyt, some being common to the rest of the text production. These practices revealed a complex network, from beginning students to senior scribes, through assistant scribes and early career scribes, which contributed to the crafting and the transmission of scribal knowledge during the New Kingdom.","PeriodicalId":23873,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für Ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde","volume":"3 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141101028","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：