Pub Date : 2024-02-29DOI: 10.1177/15563316241234336
Christopher J. Dy, Alison L Antes, Bryan A. Sisk
There are notable differences in how adult patients with traumatic brachial plexus injuries (BPI) are evaluated and treated. To better understand existing philosophies, we used the Delphi method to measure and foster consensus on routine use of electrodiagnostic testing, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography (CT) myelograms prior to surgery. Panelists were 10 peripheral nerve surgeons board certified in their respective specialties at 5 academic medical centers in the United States. We presented 2 cases (1 complete/pan-BPI and 1 upper trunk BPI) to panelists and asked how often they would order the following preoperative diagnostic tests: electrodiagnostic studies; ultrasound of the brachial plexus; MRI of the brachial plexus; CT myelogram. Our Delphi process included an initial survey with videoconference discussion after the first round. A second survey/videoconference round was conducted to further probe the items that did not reach consensus during the first round. Among the 10 surgeons, there was consensus that prior to brachial plexus surgery electrodiagnostic studies and MRI should be routinely ordered and ultrasound of the brachial plexus should not be routinely ordered. The group did not reach consensus on whether CT myelogram should or should not be routinely ordered. Based on our panel’s discussion, future work should focus on comparing the accuracy of CT myelogram and MRI for evaluation of cervical nerve root presence and viability.
{"title":"Which Tests Should Be Routinely Ordered Prior to Brachial Plexus Reconstruction? Results of a Delphi Panel","authors":"Christopher J. Dy, Alison L Antes, Bryan A. Sisk","doi":"10.1177/15563316241234336","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15563316241234336","url":null,"abstract":"There are notable differences in how adult patients with traumatic brachial plexus injuries (BPI) are evaluated and treated. To better understand existing philosophies, we used the Delphi method to measure and foster consensus on routine use of electrodiagnostic testing, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography (CT) myelograms prior to surgery. Panelists were 10 peripheral nerve surgeons board certified in their respective specialties at 5 academic medical centers in the United States. We presented 2 cases (1 complete/pan-BPI and 1 upper trunk BPI) to panelists and asked how often they would order the following preoperative diagnostic tests: electrodiagnostic studies; ultrasound of the brachial plexus; MRI of the brachial plexus; CT myelogram. Our Delphi process included an initial survey with videoconference discussion after the first round. A second survey/videoconference round was conducted to further probe the items that did not reach consensus during the first round. Among the 10 surgeons, there was consensus that prior to brachial plexus surgery electrodiagnostic studies and MRI should be routinely ordered and ultrasound of the brachial plexus should not be routinely ordered. The group did not reach consensus on whether CT myelogram should or should not be routinely ordered. Based on our panel’s discussion, future work should focus on comparing the accuracy of CT myelogram and MRI for evaluation of cervical nerve root presence and viability.","PeriodicalId":253125,"journal":{"name":"HSS Journal®: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140415891","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-14DOI: 10.1177/15563316241231586
Yukiko Matsuzaki, Danielle E. Chipman, Daniel W. Green
Pediatric patellar instability can impair function and restrict activity participation. If left untreated, it can lead to a degenerative knee. The incidence of patellar dislocations is highest in adolescents between 10 and 17 years of age; more than half of all first-time patellar dislocations occur during sports. This article reviews the evidence of risk factors for traumatic patellar instability, surgical interventions, and return-to-sport (RTS) considerations for pediatric and adolescent athletes. Anatomic risk factors for patellar instability in pediatric and adolescent patients include trochlear dysplasia, elevated tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, patella alta, genu valgum, femoral anteversion and tibial torsion, and hyperlaxity.
{"title":"Patellofemoral Instability in Pediatric and Adolescent Athletes: A Review of Risk Factors and Treatments","authors":"Yukiko Matsuzaki, Danielle E. Chipman, Daniel W. Green","doi":"10.1177/15563316241231586","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15563316241231586","url":null,"abstract":"Pediatric patellar instability can impair function and restrict activity participation. If left untreated, it can lead to a degenerative knee. The incidence of patellar dislocations is highest in adolescents between 10 and 17 years of age; more than half of all first-time patellar dislocations occur during sports. This article reviews the evidence of risk factors for traumatic patellar instability, surgical interventions, and return-to-sport (RTS) considerations for pediatric and adolescent athletes. Anatomic risk factors for patellar instability in pediatric and adolescent patients include trochlear dysplasia, elevated tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, patella alta, genu valgum, femoral anteversion and tibial torsion, and hyperlaxity.","PeriodicalId":253125,"journal":{"name":"HSS Journal®: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery","volume":"80 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139779442","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-14DOI: 10.1177/15563316241231586
Yukiko Matsuzaki, Danielle E. Chipman, Daniel W. Green
Pediatric patellar instability can impair function and restrict activity participation. If left untreated, it can lead to a degenerative knee. The incidence of patellar dislocations is highest in adolescents between 10 and 17 years of age; more than half of all first-time patellar dislocations occur during sports. This article reviews the evidence of risk factors for traumatic patellar instability, surgical interventions, and return-to-sport (RTS) considerations for pediatric and adolescent athletes. Anatomic risk factors for patellar instability in pediatric and adolescent patients include trochlear dysplasia, elevated tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, patella alta, genu valgum, femoral anteversion and tibial torsion, and hyperlaxity.
{"title":"Patellofemoral Instability in Pediatric and Adolescent Athletes: A Review of Risk Factors and Treatments","authors":"Yukiko Matsuzaki, Danielle E. Chipman, Daniel W. Green","doi":"10.1177/15563316241231586","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15563316241231586","url":null,"abstract":"Pediatric patellar instability can impair function and restrict activity participation. If left untreated, it can lead to a degenerative knee. The incidence of patellar dislocations is highest in adolescents between 10 and 17 years of age; more than half of all first-time patellar dislocations occur during sports. This article reviews the evidence of risk factors for traumatic patellar instability, surgical interventions, and return-to-sport (RTS) considerations for pediatric and adolescent athletes. Anatomic risk factors for patellar instability in pediatric and adolescent patients include trochlear dysplasia, elevated tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, patella alta, genu valgum, femoral anteversion and tibial torsion, and hyperlaxity.","PeriodicalId":253125,"journal":{"name":"HSS Journal®: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery","volume":"465 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139839124","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-13DOI: 10.1177/15563316241230052
Jennifer Bido, Ricardo Torres, Austin Kaidi, S. Rodriguez, Jose A. Rodriguez
Background: Bundled payments for total joint arthroplasty (TJA) were instituted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to reimburse providers a lump sum for operative and 90-day postoperative costs. Gaining a better understanding of which TJA patients are at risk for early return to the operating room (OR) is critical in preoperative optimization of those with modifiable risks, which could improve bundled-payment performance. Purpose: We sought to identify the most common reason for readmissions, as well as patient characteristics and costs, associated with early return to the OR among TJA patients. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of Medicare patients who had undergone primary total hip or knee arthroplasty (THA or TKA) between 2013 and 2018 at a tertiary care hospital. We used the CMS research identifiable files database to identify the most common reasons for readmissions and revisions within 90 days of surgery. Total billing claims were used to determine the cost of early readmissions and revisions. Multivariate regression analysis was used to determine the characteristics associated with early readmission or revision. Results: Out of 20 166 primary TJA patients identified, we found 1349 readmissions (5.6%) and 163 (0.8%) revisions within 90 days of surgery. Dislocation was the most common indication for readmission, and periprosthetic joint infection was the most common indication for revision. Early return to the OR was associated with a mean $105,988 (standard deviation [SD] = $76,865) in CMS claims for the inpatient stay. Factors associated with a higher risk of early reoperation were female sex, THA, longer length of stay, and discharge to long-term care facility. Conclusions: This retrospective cohort study found that early return to the OR after TJA increased overall 90-day costs by 260%, suggesting that early reoperation might have a significant impact on bundled payments. Further study is warranted.
{"title":"Early Readmission and Revision After Total Joint Arthroplasty: An Analysis of Cause and Cost","authors":"Jennifer Bido, Ricardo Torres, Austin Kaidi, S. Rodriguez, Jose A. Rodriguez","doi":"10.1177/15563316241230052","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15563316241230052","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Bundled payments for total joint arthroplasty (TJA) were instituted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to reimburse providers a lump sum for operative and 90-day postoperative costs. Gaining a better understanding of which TJA patients are at risk for early return to the operating room (OR) is critical in preoperative optimization of those with modifiable risks, which could improve bundled-payment performance. Purpose: We sought to identify the most common reason for readmissions, as well as patient characteristics and costs, associated with early return to the OR among TJA patients. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of Medicare patients who had undergone primary total hip or knee arthroplasty (THA or TKA) between 2013 and 2018 at a tertiary care hospital. We used the CMS research identifiable files database to identify the most common reasons for readmissions and revisions within 90 days of surgery. Total billing claims were used to determine the cost of early readmissions and revisions. Multivariate regression analysis was used to determine the characteristics associated with early readmission or revision. Results: Out of 20 166 primary TJA patients identified, we found 1349 readmissions (5.6%) and 163 (0.8%) revisions within 90 days of surgery. Dislocation was the most common indication for readmission, and periprosthetic joint infection was the most common indication for revision. Early return to the OR was associated with a mean $105,988 (standard deviation [SD] = $76,865) in CMS claims for the inpatient stay. Factors associated with a higher risk of early reoperation were female sex, THA, longer length of stay, and discharge to long-term care facility. Conclusions: This retrospective cohort study found that early return to the OR after TJA increased overall 90-day costs by 260%, suggesting that early reoperation might have a significant impact on bundled payments. Further study is warranted.","PeriodicalId":253125,"journal":{"name":"HSS Journal®: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery","volume":"49 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139841884","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-13DOI: 10.1177/15563316241230052
Jennifer Bido, Ricardo Torres, Austin Kaidi, S. Rodriguez, Jose A. Rodriguez
Background: Bundled payments for total joint arthroplasty (TJA) were instituted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to reimburse providers a lump sum for operative and 90-day postoperative costs. Gaining a better understanding of which TJA patients are at risk for early return to the operating room (OR) is critical in preoperative optimization of those with modifiable risks, which could improve bundled-payment performance. Purpose: We sought to identify the most common reason for readmissions, as well as patient characteristics and costs, associated with early return to the OR among TJA patients. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of Medicare patients who had undergone primary total hip or knee arthroplasty (THA or TKA) between 2013 and 2018 at a tertiary care hospital. We used the CMS research identifiable files database to identify the most common reasons for readmissions and revisions within 90 days of surgery. Total billing claims were used to determine the cost of early readmissions and revisions. Multivariate regression analysis was used to determine the characteristics associated with early readmission or revision. Results: Out of 20 166 primary TJA patients identified, we found 1349 readmissions (5.6%) and 163 (0.8%) revisions within 90 days of surgery. Dislocation was the most common indication for readmission, and periprosthetic joint infection was the most common indication for revision. Early return to the OR was associated with a mean $105,988 (standard deviation [SD] = $76,865) in CMS claims for the inpatient stay. Factors associated with a higher risk of early reoperation were female sex, THA, longer length of stay, and discharge to long-term care facility. Conclusions: This retrospective cohort study found that early return to the OR after TJA increased overall 90-day costs by 260%, suggesting that early reoperation might have a significant impact on bundled payments. Further study is warranted.
{"title":"Early Readmission and Revision After Total Joint Arthroplasty: An Analysis of Cause and Cost","authors":"Jennifer Bido, Ricardo Torres, Austin Kaidi, S. Rodriguez, Jose A. Rodriguez","doi":"10.1177/15563316241230052","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15563316241230052","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Bundled payments for total joint arthroplasty (TJA) were instituted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to reimburse providers a lump sum for operative and 90-day postoperative costs. Gaining a better understanding of which TJA patients are at risk for early return to the operating room (OR) is critical in preoperative optimization of those with modifiable risks, which could improve bundled-payment performance. Purpose: We sought to identify the most common reason for readmissions, as well as patient characteristics and costs, associated with early return to the OR among TJA patients. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of Medicare patients who had undergone primary total hip or knee arthroplasty (THA or TKA) between 2013 and 2018 at a tertiary care hospital. We used the CMS research identifiable files database to identify the most common reasons for readmissions and revisions within 90 days of surgery. Total billing claims were used to determine the cost of early readmissions and revisions. Multivariate regression analysis was used to determine the characteristics associated with early readmission or revision. Results: Out of 20 166 primary TJA patients identified, we found 1349 readmissions (5.6%) and 163 (0.8%) revisions within 90 days of surgery. Dislocation was the most common indication for readmission, and periprosthetic joint infection was the most common indication for revision. Early return to the OR was associated with a mean $105,988 (standard deviation [SD] = $76,865) in CMS claims for the inpatient stay. Factors associated with a higher risk of early reoperation were female sex, THA, longer length of stay, and discharge to long-term care facility. Conclusions: This retrospective cohort study found that early return to the OR after TJA increased overall 90-day costs by 260%, suggesting that early reoperation might have a significant impact on bundled payments. Further study is warranted.","PeriodicalId":253125,"journal":{"name":"HSS Journal®: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery","volume":"14 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139781831","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-07DOI: 10.1177/15563316241228267
Christian Lausmann, Anne Wollny, M. Citak, Thorsten Gehrke, F. Timo Beil, Min-Jae Lee, Niklas Unter Ecker
Patients presenting with a sinus tract over total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are challenging cases of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). A 2-stage revision TKA has long been considered the gold standard for the management of PJI. At our institution, approximately 85% of patients with PJI, including patients with a sinus tract, undergo 1-stage revision TKA. We sought to evaluate rates of reinfection and reoperation and predictors of failure of 1-stage revision TKA in patients with a concomitant sinus tract. We retrospectively reviewed patients with PJI and a sinus tract overlying TKA who underwent 1-stage revision TKA following a well-defined surgical protocol at our institution between January 2001 and December 2018. Of 170 patients included, 69 patients (40.6%) had a sinus tract overlying TKA; 101 patients without a sinus were the propensity-matched control group. The success rate of controlling reinfection with 1-stage revision TKA with a concomitant sinus was 78.3% with a mean follow-up of 4.8 years. The most common intraoperatively isolated organisms in patients with a sinus tract were coagulase-negative Staphylococcus in 28 patients (40.6%), Staphylococcus aureus in 12 patients (17.2%), and polymicrobial infection in 14 patients (20.3%). A sinus tract in line with the surgical wound was associated with a higher risk of reoperation than a sinus tract away from the wound. Our retrospective study suggests that 1-stage revision TKA may be a viable treatment option for patients presenting with a sinus tract. A sinus in line with the former incision was associated with a higher rate of revision. Surgeons should take into consideration this risk for revision before performing a 1-stage exchange surgery.
{"title":"Mid-term Results of 1-stage Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection With a Sinus Tract","authors":"Christian Lausmann, Anne Wollny, M. Citak, Thorsten Gehrke, F. Timo Beil, Min-Jae Lee, Niklas Unter Ecker","doi":"10.1177/15563316241228267","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15563316241228267","url":null,"abstract":"Patients presenting with a sinus tract over total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are challenging cases of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). A 2-stage revision TKA has long been considered the gold standard for the management of PJI. At our institution, approximately 85% of patients with PJI, including patients with a sinus tract, undergo 1-stage revision TKA. We sought to evaluate rates of reinfection and reoperation and predictors of failure of 1-stage revision TKA in patients with a concomitant sinus tract. We retrospectively reviewed patients with PJI and a sinus tract overlying TKA who underwent 1-stage revision TKA following a well-defined surgical protocol at our institution between January 2001 and December 2018. Of 170 patients included, 69 patients (40.6%) had a sinus tract overlying TKA; 101 patients without a sinus were the propensity-matched control group. The success rate of controlling reinfection with 1-stage revision TKA with a concomitant sinus was 78.3% with a mean follow-up of 4.8 years. The most common intraoperatively isolated organisms in patients with a sinus tract were coagulase-negative Staphylococcus in 28 patients (40.6%), Staphylococcus aureus in 12 patients (17.2%), and polymicrobial infection in 14 patients (20.3%). A sinus tract in line with the surgical wound was associated with a higher risk of reoperation than a sinus tract away from the wound. Our retrospective study suggests that 1-stage revision TKA may be a viable treatment option for patients presenting with a sinus tract. A sinus in line with the former incision was associated with a higher rate of revision. Surgeons should take into consideration this risk for revision before performing a 1-stage exchange surgery.","PeriodicalId":253125,"journal":{"name":"HSS Journal®: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery","volume":"107 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139794849","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-07DOI: 10.1177/15563316241228267
Christian Lausmann, Anne Wollny, M. Citak, Thorsten Gehrke, F. Timo Beil, Min-Jae Lee, Niklas Unter Ecker
Patients presenting with a sinus tract over total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are challenging cases of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). A 2-stage revision TKA has long been considered the gold standard for the management of PJI. At our institution, approximately 85% of patients with PJI, including patients with a sinus tract, undergo 1-stage revision TKA. We sought to evaluate rates of reinfection and reoperation and predictors of failure of 1-stage revision TKA in patients with a concomitant sinus tract. We retrospectively reviewed patients with PJI and a sinus tract overlying TKA who underwent 1-stage revision TKA following a well-defined surgical protocol at our institution between January 2001 and December 2018. Of 170 patients included, 69 patients (40.6%) had a sinus tract overlying TKA; 101 patients without a sinus were the propensity-matched control group. The success rate of controlling reinfection with 1-stage revision TKA with a concomitant sinus was 78.3% with a mean follow-up of 4.8 years. The most common intraoperatively isolated organisms in patients with a sinus tract were coagulase-negative Staphylococcus in 28 patients (40.6%), Staphylococcus aureus in 12 patients (17.2%), and polymicrobial infection in 14 patients (20.3%). A sinus tract in line with the surgical wound was associated with a higher risk of reoperation than a sinus tract away from the wound. Our retrospective study suggests that 1-stage revision TKA may be a viable treatment option for patients presenting with a sinus tract. A sinus in line with the former incision was associated with a higher rate of revision. Surgeons should take into consideration this risk for revision before performing a 1-stage exchange surgery.
{"title":"Mid-term Results of 1-stage Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection With a Sinus Tract","authors":"Christian Lausmann, Anne Wollny, M. Citak, Thorsten Gehrke, F. Timo Beil, Min-Jae Lee, Niklas Unter Ecker","doi":"10.1177/15563316241228267","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15563316241228267","url":null,"abstract":"Patients presenting with a sinus tract over total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are challenging cases of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). A 2-stage revision TKA has long been considered the gold standard for the management of PJI. At our institution, approximately 85% of patients with PJI, including patients with a sinus tract, undergo 1-stage revision TKA. We sought to evaluate rates of reinfection and reoperation and predictors of failure of 1-stage revision TKA in patients with a concomitant sinus tract. We retrospectively reviewed patients with PJI and a sinus tract overlying TKA who underwent 1-stage revision TKA following a well-defined surgical protocol at our institution between January 2001 and December 2018. Of 170 patients included, 69 patients (40.6%) had a sinus tract overlying TKA; 101 patients without a sinus were the propensity-matched control group. The success rate of controlling reinfection with 1-stage revision TKA with a concomitant sinus was 78.3% with a mean follow-up of 4.8 years. The most common intraoperatively isolated organisms in patients with a sinus tract were coagulase-negative Staphylococcus in 28 patients (40.6%), Staphylococcus aureus in 12 patients (17.2%), and polymicrobial infection in 14 patients (20.3%). A sinus tract in line with the surgical wound was associated with a higher risk of reoperation than a sinus tract away from the wound. Our retrospective study suggests that 1-stage revision TKA may be a viable treatment option for patients presenting with a sinus tract. A sinus in line with the former incision was associated with a higher rate of revision. Surgeons should take into consideration this risk for revision before performing a 1-stage exchange surgery.","PeriodicalId":253125,"journal":{"name":"HSS Journal®: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery","volume":"64 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139854816","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-28DOI: 10.1177/15563316231223503
Pratyush Shahi, Tejas Subramanian, Omri Maayan, Nishtha Singh, Kasra Araghi, Sumedha Singh, Tomoyuki Asada, Maximilian K Korsun, Olivia Tuma, Anthony Pajak, Evan D. Sheha, James Dowdell, Sheeraz A Qureshi, S. Iyer
Although a few recent studies showed good outcomes in back pain-predominant patients following decompression alone, none of the studies had a comparative fusion group. We sought to compare outcomes of minimally invasive decompression alone versus fusion in patients with predominant back pain. This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent minimally invasive decompression alone or fusion and had preoperative back pain > leg pain. Outcome measures were (1) patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), (2) minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement, (3) patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) achievement, and (4) global rating change (GRC). As a subgroup analysis, MCID, PASS, and GRC rates were also compared between the decompression and fusion groups for patients with preoperative back pain < leg pain. Of 510 patients included, there were statistically significant improvements in all PROMs in both groups at <6 and >6 months with no significant difference in the magnitude of improvement. The fusion group showed significantly higher MCID achievement rates for Visual Analog Scale (VAS) back at <6 months (85% vs 70%) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at >6 months (67% vs 51%). Proportion of patients achieving PASS and feeling better after surgery based on response to GRC showed no difference between the groups. The subgroup analysis for decompression versus fusion in patients with preoperative back pain < leg pain showed no differences in MCID, PASS, or GRC rates. This retrospective cohort study found that in patients with predominant back pain, minimally invasive decompression alone had significantly less MCID achievement rates in VAS back at <6 months and ODI at >6 months. However, it did lead to an overall significant improvement in PROMs, similar PASS achievement rates, and similar responses on the GRC scale.
{"title":"Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Decompression Alone Versus Fusion for Predominant Back Pain","authors":"Pratyush Shahi, Tejas Subramanian, Omri Maayan, Nishtha Singh, Kasra Araghi, Sumedha Singh, Tomoyuki Asada, Maximilian K Korsun, Olivia Tuma, Anthony Pajak, Evan D. Sheha, James Dowdell, Sheeraz A Qureshi, S. Iyer","doi":"10.1177/15563316231223503","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15563316231223503","url":null,"abstract":"Although a few recent studies showed good outcomes in back pain-predominant patients following decompression alone, none of the studies had a comparative fusion group. We sought to compare outcomes of minimally invasive decompression alone versus fusion in patients with predominant back pain. This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent minimally invasive decompression alone or fusion and had preoperative back pain > leg pain. Outcome measures were (1) patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), (2) minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement, (3) patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) achievement, and (4) global rating change (GRC). As a subgroup analysis, MCID, PASS, and GRC rates were also compared between the decompression and fusion groups for patients with preoperative back pain < leg pain. Of 510 patients included, there were statistically significant improvements in all PROMs in both groups at <6 and >6 months with no significant difference in the magnitude of improvement. The fusion group showed significantly higher MCID achievement rates for Visual Analog Scale (VAS) back at <6 months (85% vs 70%) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at >6 months (67% vs 51%). Proportion of patients achieving PASS and feeling better after surgery based on response to GRC showed no difference between the groups. The subgroup analysis for decompression versus fusion in patients with preoperative back pain < leg pain showed no differences in MCID, PASS, or GRC rates. This retrospective cohort study found that in patients with predominant back pain, minimally invasive decompression alone had significantly less MCID achievement rates in VAS back at <6 months and ODI at >6 months. However, it did lead to an overall significant improvement in PROMs, similar PASS achievement rates, and similar responses on the GRC scale.","PeriodicalId":253125,"journal":{"name":"HSS Journal®: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery","volume":"399 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140490570","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-25DOI: 10.1177/15563316231202750
P. K. Sculco, Dimitrios A. Flevas, S. Jerabek, William A. Jiranek, Mathias P. Bostrom, F. S. Haddad, T. Fehring, A. Gonzalez Della Valle, D. Berry, Marco Brenneis, Troy D. Bornes, Carolena E. Rojas Marcos, Timothy M. Wright, T. Sculco
The evaluation, classification, and treatment of significant bone loss after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) continue to be a complex and debated topic in revision TKA (rTKA). Despite the introduction of new evidence and innovative technologies aimed at addressing the approach and care of severe bone loss in rTKA, there is no single document that systematically incorporates these newer surgical approaches. Therefore, a comprehensive review of the treatment of severe bone loss in rTKA is necessary. The Stavros Niarchos Foundation Complex Joint Reconstruction Center Hospital for Special Surgery, dedicated to clinical care and research primarily in revision hip and knee replacement, convened a Management of Bone Loss in Revision TKA symposium on June 24, 2022. At this meeting, the 42 international invited experts were divided into groups; each group was assigned to discuss questions related to 1 of the 4 topics: (1) assessing preoperative workup and imaging, anticipated bone loss, classification system, and implant surveillance; (2) achieving durable fixation in the setting of significant bone loss in revision TKA; (3) managing patellar bone loss and the extensor mechanism in cases of severe bone loss; and (4) considering the use of complex modular replacement systems: hinges, distal femoral, and proximal tibial replacements. Each group came to consensus, when possible, based on an extensive literature review and interactive discussion on their group topic. This document reviews each these 4 areas, the consensus of each group, and directions for future research.
{"title":"Management of Bone Loss in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: An International Consensus Symposium","authors":"P. K. Sculco, Dimitrios A. Flevas, S. Jerabek, William A. Jiranek, Mathias P. Bostrom, F. S. Haddad, T. Fehring, A. Gonzalez Della Valle, D. Berry, Marco Brenneis, Troy D. Bornes, Carolena E. Rojas Marcos, Timothy M. Wright, T. Sculco","doi":"10.1177/15563316231202750","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15563316231202750","url":null,"abstract":"The evaluation, classification, and treatment of significant bone loss after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) continue to be a complex and debated topic in revision TKA (rTKA). Despite the introduction of new evidence and innovative technologies aimed at addressing the approach and care of severe bone loss in rTKA, there is no single document that systematically incorporates these newer surgical approaches. Therefore, a comprehensive review of the treatment of severe bone loss in rTKA is necessary. The Stavros Niarchos Foundation Complex Joint Reconstruction Center Hospital for Special Surgery, dedicated to clinical care and research primarily in revision hip and knee replacement, convened a Management of Bone Loss in Revision TKA symposium on June 24, 2022. At this meeting, the 42 international invited experts were divided into groups; each group was assigned to discuss questions related to 1 of the 4 topics: (1) assessing preoperative workup and imaging, anticipated bone loss, classification system, and implant surveillance; (2) achieving durable fixation in the setting of significant bone loss in revision TKA; (3) managing patellar bone loss and the extensor mechanism in cases of severe bone loss; and (4) considering the use of complex modular replacement systems: hinges, distal femoral, and proximal tibial replacements. Each group came to consensus, when possible, based on an extensive literature review and interactive discussion on their group topic. This document reviews each these 4 areas, the consensus of each group, and directions for future research.","PeriodicalId":253125,"journal":{"name":"HSS Journal®: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery","volume":"115 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139596724","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-21DOI: 10.1177/15563316231222484
Ashley A. Thompson, Avinash Iyer, Jacob L. Kotlier, Cory K. Mayfield, F. Petrigliano, Joseph N. Liu
The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) publishes clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for various pathologies. An extension to the Consolidated Standards for Reporting (CONSORT) checklist provides authors with a framework for reporting harms in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The purpose of this study was to measure harms reporting among RCTs cited as supporting evidence for the AAOS CPG on the treatment of clavicle fractures. This study also sought to determine whether these reporting rates changed over time. Adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we used the AAOS CPG for clavicle fractures and conducted a linear regression analysis to model the relationship between the year of publication and the total CONSORT checklist percentage adherence over time. There were 28 RCTs cited as supporting evidence for the clavicle fractures CPG included in the final sample. The average number of the 18 CONSORT Extension for Harms items appropriately reported across all included RCTs was 9.32 (51.8%). Nine checklist items had more than 50% compliance (50%), 3 items had between 20% and 50% compliance (16.7%), and 6 items had less than 20% compliance (33.3%). The linear regression model demonstrated no significant improvement in CONSORT Harms reporting over time. Adverse events are inadequately reported in RCTs cited as supporting evidence for the AAOS Treatment of Clavicle Fractures CPGs. We recommend the utilization of standardized adverse event reporting tools specific to orthopedic trauma literature to facilitate ease in adverse event reporting among RCTs.
{"title":"Harms Reporting in the RCTs Underpinning the AAOS Clinical Practice Guidelines for Clavicle Fractures","authors":"Ashley A. Thompson, Avinash Iyer, Jacob L. Kotlier, Cory K. Mayfield, F. Petrigliano, Joseph N. Liu","doi":"10.1177/15563316231222484","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15563316231222484","url":null,"abstract":"The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) publishes clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for various pathologies. An extension to the Consolidated Standards for Reporting (CONSORT) checklist provides authors with a framework for reporting harms in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The purpose of this study was to measure harms reporting among RCTs cited as supporting evidence for the AAOS CPG on the treatment of clavicle fractures. This study also sought to determine whether these reporting rates changed over time. Adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we used the AAOS CPG for clavicle fractures and conducted a linear regression analysis to model the relationship between the year of publication and the total CONSORT checklist percentage adherence over time. There were 28 RCTs cited as supporting evidence for the clavicle fractures CPG included in the final sample. The average number of the 18 CONSORT Extension for Harms items appropriately reported across all included RCTs was 9.32 (51.8%). Nine checklist items had more than 50% compliance (50%), 3 items had between 20% and 50% compliance (16.7%), and 6 items had less than 20% compliance (33.3%). The linear regression model demonstrated no significant improvement in CONSORT Harms reporting over time. Adverse events are inadequately reported in RCTs cited as supporting evidence for the AAOS Treatment of Clavicle Fractures CPGs. We recommend the utilization of standardized adverse event reporting tools specific to orthopedic trauma literature to facilitate ease in adverse event reporting among RCTs.","PeriodicalId":253125,"journal":{"name":"HSS Journal®: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery","volume":"23 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139610050","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：