Pub Date : 2019-10-21DOI: 10.35432/1993-8330appa2782019178965
Наталя Яруліна
{"title":"ТЕОРЕТИЧНІ ПІДХОДИ ДО ВИЗНАЧЕННЯ ПОНЯТЬ «ІНФОРМАЦІЙНИЙ ПРОСТІР», «ІНФОРМАЦІЙНЕ СЕРЕДОВИЩЕ», «ІНФОРМАЦІЙНО-КОМУНІКАТИВНЕ СЕРЕДОВИЩЕ","authors":"Наталя Яруліна","doi":"10.35432/1993-8330appa2782019178965","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35432/1993-8330appa2782019178965","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":255564,"journal":{"name":"Актуальні проблеми державного управління","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122152010","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-10-21DOI: 10.35432/1993-8330appa2782019179084
Тетяна Сивак
{"title":"МІЖНАРОДНИЙ ДОСВІД ФОРМУВАННЯ СТРАТЕГІЧНИХ КОМУНІКАЦІЙ","authors":"Тетяна Сивак","doi":"10.35432/1993-8330appa2782019179084","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35432/1993-8330appa2782019179084","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":255564,"journal":{"name":"Актуальні проблеми державного управління","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122249195","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-10-21DOI: 10.35432/1993-8330appa2782019179068
Світлана Козуліна
Relevance of the paper. One of the most important classifications of regulatory acts is their classification according to legal force. It is legal force of the legal act that determines the place it occupies in the hierarchical (vertical) structure of the current legislation. According to Article 1 of the Constitution of Ukraine, Ukraine is a social and legal state. Back in 2001, the Constitutional Court of Ukraine clearly stated: "... in a legal state there is a strict hierarchy of regulatory acts ...", but until now the hierarchy of regulatory acts is not legally established. Besides, between the separate laws of Ukraine, including those defining the status and powers of the public administration bodies, there is inconsistency regarding their place according to their legal force. There is no consensus on this issue in the scientific literature. It negatively affects the state of law in the state. Consequently, the relevance of this article is conditioned by the existing collisions in the legislation of Ukraine regarding the hierarchy of regulatory acts. The purpose of the article is the study of the current state of the hierarchical place of regulatory acts in the current legislation of Ukraine, the identification of collisions in it and the justification of proposals for their elimination. Body of the paper. Most Ukrainian scholars insist that the codes have the same legal force as the laws. However, some Ukrainian codes, in particular the Civil Code of Ukraine, the Budget Code of Ukraine, contain articles about their higher legal force. However, there are no such norms in other codes of Ukraine, therefore it should be noted: it can not be that in one branch of law the codified law has a higher legal force, and in the other it has not. Consequently, the issue of the legal force of codified and un-codified laws requires legislative regulation. The question arises as to the legal force of the resolutions of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine and the decrees of the President of Ukraine (that is resolutions of the Parliament and decrees of the President of Ukraine of elusively regulatory nature). For example, in Article 113 of the Constitution of Ukraine, the Law of Ukraine "On the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine" the preference is given to the resolutions of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, but in the Law of Ukraine "On Civil Service", on the contrary - to the decrees of the President of Ukraine. Conclusions. Until now, neither the Constitution of Ukraine nor other legislative acts define the hierarchy of certain regulatory acts, and therefore the scientific literature raises justified questions regarding their legal force. The current laws of Ukraine regulating the activities of public authorities solve these issues differently. And in law enforcement activities, including the issues on resolving litigation, the key role is played by subjectivity of a law enforcer. Eliminating this gap is possible only in one way that is by adopting the Law of Ukraine
{"title":"ІЄРАРХІЯ НОРМАТИВНО-ПРАВОВИХ АКТІВ: СУЧАСНИЙ СТАН ТА АКТУАЛЬНІ ПИТАННЯ","authors":"Світлана Козуліна","doi":"10.35432/1993-8330appa2782019179068","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35432/1993-8330appa2782019179068","url":null,"abstract":"Relevance of the paper. One of the most important classifications of regulatory acts is their classification according to legal force. It is legal force of the legal act that determines the place it occupies in the hierarchical (vertical) structure of the current legislation. According to Article 1 of the Constitution of Ukraine, Ukraine is a social and legal state. Back in 2001, the Constitutional Court of Ukraine clearly stated: \"... in a legal state there is a strict hierarchy of regulatory acts ...\", but until now the hierarchy of regulatory acts is not legally established. Besides, between the separate laws of Ukraine, including those defining the status and powers of the public administration bodies, there is inconsistency regarding their place according to their legal force. There is no consensus on this issue in the scientific literature. It negatively affects the state of law in the state. Consequently, the relevance of this article is conditioned by the existing collisions in the legislation of Ukraine regarding the hierarchy of regulatory acts. The purpose of the article is the study of the current state of the hierarchical place of regulatory acts in the current legislation of Ukraine, the identification of collisions in it and the justification of proposals for their elimination. Body of the paper. Most Ukrainian scholars insist that the codes have the same legal force as the laws. However, some Ukrainian codes, in particular the Civil Code of Ukraine, the Budget Code of Ukraine, contain articles about their higher legal force. However, there are no such norms in other codes of Ukraine, therefore it should be noted: it can not be that in one branch of law the codified law has a higher legal force, and in the other it has not. Consequently, the issue of the legal force of codified and un-codified laws requires legislative regulation. The question arises as to the legal force of the resolutions of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine and the decrees of the President of Ukraine (that is resolutions of the Parliament and decrees of the President of Ukraine of elusively regulatory nature). For example, in Article 113 of the Constitution of Ukraine, the Law of Ukraine \"On the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine\" the preference is given to the resolutions of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, but in the Law of Ukraine \"On Civil Service\", on the contrary - to the decrees of the President of Ukraine. Conclusions. Until now, neither the Constitution of Ukraine nor other legislative acts define the hierarchy of certain regulatory acts, and therefore the scientific literature raises justified questions regarding their legal force. The current laws of Ukraine regulating the activities of public authorities solve these issues differently. And in law enforcement activities, including the issues on resolving litigation, the key role is played by subjectivity of a law enforcer. Eliminating this gap is possible only in one way that is by adopting the Law of Ukraine ","PeriodicalId":255564,"journal":{"name":"Актуальні проблеми державного управління","volume":"17 24","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114085366","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-10-21DOI: 10.35432/1993-8330appa2782019179074
О. А. Марущак
The article deals with the problem of connection between the state and taxes. and how the economic nature of taxes implements itself in the management of the state. The tax has a dual nature. On the one hand, it is an economic component of the economy, on the other hand, it is a component of public power. This feature determines the place it occupies in a social order. In terms of the economy, the tax is a burden that is alien to the reproduction process, because it removes the funds from normal functioning and constrains the development of the economy, but, on the other hand, it ensures the fulfillment of the public functions that are necessary for society, and therefore it is a good thing for it. Tax is the income of the state from its participation in social reproduction by freeing up part of the additional income of society. Modern economic processes have a significant effect on social relations. Traditional approaches to the regulation of financial and economic activity have exhausted themselves, which leads to significant shocks in socio-economic life. This in turn requires state measures to stabilize and sustainably develop the economy. This task lies in full with public administration, which should strengthen the effectiveness of its management functions in the economic sphere. In this direction, tax is a significant potential as a regulator of economic activity. The problem of state regulation in modern conditions essentially affects the economy and society. The existing tax system is one of the most complex in the world. The study of its functional content provides an opportunity to improve the efficiency of state regulation of economic processes. Taxes are an important part of the socio-economic life of society. The equilibrium system of taxation depends on the development of the economy. There are a large number of tax systems in the world, indicating that there is no perfect system, and therefore the tax system research continues. Taxes as a phenomenon have historical characteristics and develop together with the development of the economic system, and therefore have a volatile nature that needs to be further explored. Therefore, there is again a need for a study of the nature of taxes and their functioning in the socially reproduced. The tax has a dual nature. On the one hand, it is an economic component of the economy, on the other hand, it is a component of public power. This feature determines the place it occupies in a social order. In terms of the economy, the tax is a burden that is alien to the reproduction process, because it removes the funds from normal functioning and constrains the development of the economy, but, on the other hand, it ensures the fulfillment of the public functions that are necessary for society, and therefore it is a good thing for it. This is an eternal contradiction of taxes, which is solved historically empirically, as a result of which the tax system periodically varies. But the contradiction is no
{"title":"ДЕРЖАВНИЦЬКА СУТНІСТЬ ЕКОНОМІЧНОЇ ПРИРОДИ ПОДАТКІВ","authors":"О. А. Марущак","doi":"10.35432/1993-8330appa2782019179074","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35432/1993-8330appa2782019179074","url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the problem of connection between the state and taxes. and how the economic nature of taxes implements itself in the management of the state. The tax has a dual nature. On the one hand, it is an economic component of the economy, on the other hand, it is a component of public power. This feature determines the place it occupies in a social order. In terms of the economy, the tax is a burden that is alien to the reproduction process, because it removes the funds from normal functioning and constrains the development of the economy, but, on the other hand, it ensures the fulfillment of the public functions that are necessary for society, and therefore it is a good thing for it. Tax is the income of the state from its participation in social reproduction by freeing up part of the additional income of society. Modern economic processes have a significant effect on social relations. Traditional approaches to the regulation of financial and economic activity have exhausted themselves, which leads to significant shocks in socio-economic life. This in turn requires state measures to stabilize and sustainably develop the economy. This task lies in full with public administration, which should strengthen the effectiveness of its management functions in the economic sphere. In this direction, tax is a significant potential as a regulator of economic activity. The problem of state regulation in modern conditions essentially affects the economy and society. The existing tax system is one of the most complex in the world. The study of its functional content provides an opportunity to improve the efficiency of state regulation of economic processes. Taxes are an important part of the socio-economic life of society. The equilibrium system of taxation depends on the development of the economy. There are a large number of tax systems in the world, indicating that there is no perfect system, and therefore the tax system research continues. Taxes as a phenomenon have historical characteristics and develop together with the development of the economic system, and therefore have a volatile nature that needs to be further explored. Therefore, there is again a need for a study of the nature of taxes and their functioning in the socially reproduced. The tax has a dual nature. On the one hand, it is an economic component of the economy, on the other hand, it is a component of public power. This feature determines the place it occupies in a social order. In terms of the economy, the tax is a burden that is alien to the reproduction process, because it removes the funds from normal functioning and constrains the development of the economy, but, on the other hand, it ensures the fulfillment of the public functions that are necessary for society, and therefore it is a good thing for it. This is an eternal contradiction of taxes, which is solved historically empirically, as a result of which the tax system periodically varies. But the contradiction is no","PeriodicalId":255564,"journal":{"name":"Актуальні проблеми державного управління","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126241440","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-10-21DOI: 10.35432/1993-8330appa2782019179063
Юлія Ковтун
{"title":"КОНЦЕПТ «ОПТИМІЗАЦІЯ» В ПОЛІТИКО-УПРАВЛІНСЬКОМУ ДИСКУРСІ","authors":"Юлія Ковтун","doi":"10.35432/1993-8330appa2782019179063","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35432/1993-8330appa2782019179063","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":255564,"journal":{"name":"Актуальні проблеми державного управління","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117273672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-10-21DOI: 10.35432/1993-8330appa2782019179076
Володимир Марущак
{"title":"АДАПТИВНІСТЬ ДЕРЖАВНОГО УПРАВЛІННЯ ДО РЕГУЛЮВАННЯ ЕКОНОМІЧНИХ ПРОЦЕСІВ","authors":"Володимир Марущак","doi":"10.35432/1993-8330appa2782019179076","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35432/1993-8330appa2782019179076","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":255564,"journal":{"name":"Актуальні проблеми державного управління","volume":"201 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115698753","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-10-21DOI: 10.35432/1993-8330appa2782019179115
Геннадій Фердман
{"title":"ПРОБЛЕМИ ТА ПЕРСПЕКТИВИ РОЗВИТКУ ТРАНСПОРТНОЇ СИСТЕМИ УКРАЇНИ","authors":"Геннадій Фердман","doi":"10.35432/1993-8330appa2782019179115","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35432/1993-8330appa2782019179115","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":255564,"journal":{"name":"Актуальні проблеми державного управління","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134112224","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
У монографії досліджується широкий спектр методологічних, теоретичних і практичних проблем децентралізації управління ПТО. Здійснено аналіз обєктивних закономірностей децентралізації управління ПТО, пріоритетних чинників розвитку управління ПТО, обгрунтовано концептуальні засади, методологічні основи децентралізації управління в умовах сучасного ринку праці.
{"title":"КЛАСТЕРНА ІНІЦІАТИВА ЯК ІНСТИТУЦІОНАЛЬНА ФОРМА ПУБЛІЧНОГО ІНСТРУМЕНТУ РЕАЛІЗАЦІЇ ДЕРЖАВНОЇ РЕГІОНАЛЬНОЇ ПОЛІТИКИ","authors":"Валентина Свистун, Д.Д. Айстраханов, Галина Василівна Єльникова, Людмила Анатоліївна Онищук, Лариса Михайлівна Петренко, Ольга Іванівна Щербак, Є.В. Кулик, Г.І. Лук'яненко, С.О. Нікітчина","doi":"10.35432/1993-8330appa2782019179086","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35432/1993-8330appa2782019179086","url":null,"abstract":"У монографії досліджується широкий спектр методологічних, теоретичних і практичних проблем децентралізації управління ПТО. Здійснено аналіз обєктивних закономірностей децентралізації управління ПТО, пріоритетних чинників розвитку управління ПТО, обгрунтовано концептуальні засади, методологічні основи децентралізації управління в умовах сучасного ринку праці.","PeriodicalId":255564,"journal":{"name":"Актуальні проблеми державного управління","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115716016","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-10-21DOI: 10.35432/1993-8330appa2782019179079
В. П. Солових, Олександр Миколайович Москаленко
The article is dedicated to the study of Common Foreign and Security Policy at the contemporary stage of the EU evolution. The article provides the analysis of both initiatives aimed at enhancing this policy, which have already been initiated in recent years and the major directions of the transformation of this policy from the perspective of the necessity for the EU to face the contemporary security challenges at the global and regional level. The article refers to the fact that the European integration process has always had the security dimension as the entire project was started to prevent another war between France and Germany, which had previously been the major reason for two world wars. The EU’s enlargement after the end of the Cold war also had the security dimension as this process reconnected the European continent previously divided by the «iron curtain». The fact that the new EU members from the Central and Eastern Europe simultaneously became members of NATO only stresses this approach. Thus, security has been among the major issue in the EU relations with its neighbouring countries and primarily within the framework of the EU’s Neighbourhood Policy and Eastern Partnership. However, new security challenges for the EU which appeared in the connection with its attempts to enhance its relations with the neighbouring countries emphasized the need to modernize its common and security policy (CFSP), which remains a separate policy area with its special rules and procedures as provided for by the Lisbon Treaty. The aim of the article is to analyze its Common Foreign and Security Policy at the contemporary stage of the evolution of the European Union. The article focuses on the recent initiatives in terms of the reformation and enhancement of this policy area and on the major directions for the implementation of this policy in the context of the existing global and regional challenges. The task of the article is to provide the insight into the evolution of the CFSP from the perspective of both the initiatives for the reformation of this policy area and the EU’s reaction on the faced security challenges of the global and regional scale. The major conclusion of the offered analysis is the thesis about the need for further transformation of CFSP, which includes the formation of the synergy with other policies within EU common foreign policy and the spread for CFSP of the common principles and approaches existing in the constitutional order of the EU. Moreover, the article emphasizes the fact that the mentioned process has already been started, despite the existing limitations set by the rules of the Lisbon Treaty. The Russian aggression in Ukraine, the war in Syria as well as a number of armed conflicts in Northern Africa stressed the growing importance of the security dimension for the EU’s future. At the same time, this has led to the enhanced demands of the EU member states for a more energetic EU policy in terms of ensuring international p
{"title":"СПІЛЬНА ЗОВНІШНЯ ПОЛІТИКА ТА ПОЛІТИКА БЕЗПЕКИ НА СУЧАСНОМУ ЕТАПІ РОЗВИТКУ ЄВРОПЕЙСЬКОГО СОЮЗУ","authors":"В. П. Солових, Олександр Миколайович Москаленко","doi":"10.35432/1993-8330appa2782019179079","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35432/1993-8330appa2782019179079","url":null,"abstract":"The article is dedicated to the study of Common Foreign and Security Policy at the contemporary stage of the EU evolution. The article provides the analysis of both initiatives aimed at enhancing this policy, which have already been initiated in recent years and the major directions of the transformation of this policy from the perspective of the necessity for the EU to face the contemporary security challenges at the global and regional level. The article refers to the fact that the European integration process has always had the security dimension as the entire project was started to prevent another war between France and Germany, which had previously been the major reason for two world wars. The EU’s enlargement after the end of the Cold war also had the security dimension as this process reconnected the European continent previously divided by the «iron curtain». The fact that the new EU members from the Central and Eastern Europe simultaneously became members of NATO only stresses this approach. Thus, security has been among the major issue in the EU relations with its neighbouring countries and primarily within the framework of the EU’s Neighbourhood Policy and Eastern Partnership. However, new security challenges for the EU which appeared in the connection with its attempts to enhance its relations with the neighbouring countries emphasized the need to modernize its common and security policy (CFSP), which remains a separate policy area with its special rules and procedures as provided for by the Lisbon Treaty. The aim of the article is to analyze its Common Foreign and Security Policy at the contemporary stage of the evolution of the European Union. The article focuses on the recent initiatives in terms of the reformation and enhancement of this policy area and on the major directions for the implementation of this policy in the context of the existing global and regional challenges. The task of the article is to provide the insight into the evolution of the CFSP from the perspective of both the initiatives for the reformation of this policy area and the EU’s reaction on the faced security challenges of the global and regional scale. The major conclusion of the offered analysis is the thesis about the need for further transformation of CFSP, which includes the formation of the synergy with other policies within EU common foreign policy and the spread for CFSP of the common principles and approaches existing in the constitutional order of the EU. Moreover, the article emphasizes the fact that the mentioned process has already been started, despite the existing limitations set by the rules of the Lisbon Treaty. The Russian aggression in Ukraine, the war in Syria as well as a number of armed conflicts in Northern Africa stressed the growing importance of the security dimension for the EU’s future. At the same time, this has led to the enhanced demands of the EU member states for a more energetic EU policy in terms of ensuring international p","PeriodicalId":255564,"journal":{"name":"Актуальні проблеми державного управління","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128190204","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-10-21DOI: 10.35432/1993-8330appa2782019179100
Олексій Грішин
{"title":"ІСТОРИЧНА РОЛЬ І МІСЦЕ ПРЕЗИДЕНТА В СИСТЕМІ ОРГАНІВ ДЕРЖАВНОЇ ВЛАДИ СУЧАСНОЇ УКРАЇНИ","authors":"Олексій Грішин","doi":"10.35432/1993-8330appa2782019179100","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35432/1993-8330appa2782019179100","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":255564,"journal":{"name":"Актуальні проблеми державного управління","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130548992","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：