Pub Date : 2022-12-02DOI: 10.1212/ne9.0000000000200029
Daniel S. Harrison, M. Naclerio, Kathryn Swider, C. Garrubba, A.T. Yu, Andrew Busler, Lena Liu, Christopher Doughty
A growing number of advanced practice providers (APPs) are entering neurologic practice, and educational initiatives focused on postgraduate training in neurology for these providers are growing in turn. Neurologic education in APP degree programs is not well defined, which limits the ability to tailor these initiatives to the specific needs of APPs. We aim to describe neurologic education in physician assistant (PA) degree programs to better inform these efforts.The 2018 American Academy of Neurology clerkship director survey was adapted for directors of PA programs via an iterative approach. The survey was distributed to program directors (PDs) of accredited programs in Fall 2021 and again in Spring 2022 for nonresponders. Simultaneously, websites of accredited programs were systematically reviewed for content related to neurologic education.Sixty of 255 contacted PDs completed the survey (23.5%). All PDs reported education in selected neuroscience topics. Neuroradiology instruction was included less frequently (66.7%) than neuroanatomy (91.7%) or neurologic examination techniques (95.0%). Twenty-six PDs (43.3%) reported a dedicated neuroscience course; 53 of 260 websites reviewed identified dedicated neuroscience courses (20.8%,k= 0.41). Directors of 10 (38.5%) reported neuroscience courses were neuroscience trained. Only 1 program required a neurology clinical rotation in both the website review (0.4%) and the PD survey (1.7%,k= 1.00). Elective neurology rotations were offered by 51 programs (85.0%) and used by less than 20% of students in 46 programs (92.0%). More programs with dedicated neuroscience didactics (80.0% vs 74.2%) and offerings in clinical neurology (78.7% vs 66.7%) reported graduates pursuing careers in neurology, but these differences were not statistically significant.Survey respondents reported the inclusion of most of the queried preclinical neuroscience topics, typically distributed throughout the curriculum. Dedicated neuroscience courses were less common and most commonly not taught by a neurologist or neurology APP. Clinical neurology rotations are almost never required, but most programs offer an elective. These results suggest opportunities for augmenting neurologic education in APP degree programs, including encouraging students to take clinical neurology rotations and increasing exposure to APPs practicing neurology. These findings additionally inform key targets for postgraduate educational initiatives.
越来越多的高级实践提供者(app)正在进入神经病学实践,而针对这些提供者的神经病学研究生培训的教育倡议也在不断增长。应用程序学位课程中的神经学教育没有很好的定义,这限制了根据应用程序的具体需求量身定制这些举措的能力。我们的目标是描述医师助理(PA)学位课程的神经学教育,以更好地告知这些努力。2018年美国神经病学学会(American Academy of Neurology)的见习主任调查是通过迭代方法针对私人助理项目主任进行的。该调查于2021年秋季分发给认证项目的项目主管(pd),并于2022年春季再次分发给无应答者。同时,系统地审查了认证项目的网站,以获取与神经学教育相关的内容。在255名联络的警务人员中,有60名(23.5%)完成了调查。所有博士都报告了所选神经科学主题的教育。与神经解剖学(91.7%)或神经检查技术(95.0%)相比,神经放射学指导(66.7%)被纳入的频率较低。26名博士(43.3%)报告了专门的神经科学课程;260个网站中有53个确定了专门的神经科学课程(20.8%,k= 0.41)。10名主任(38.5%)报告神经科学课程受过神经科学培训。在网站评价(0.4%)和PD调查(1.7%,k= 1.00)中,只有1个项目需要神经病学临床轮转。51个项目(85.0%)提供选修神经学轮转,46个项目(92.0%)的学生比例不到20%。更多专门的神经科学教学专业(80.0%对74.2%)和临床神经病学专业(78.7%对66.7%)的毕业生选择神经病学专业,但这些差异在统计上并不显著。调查应答者报告了大多数被询问的临床前神经科学主题,通常分布在整个课程中。专门的神经科学课程不太常见,大多数不是由神经科医生或神经病学APP教授。临床神经病学轮转几乎不需要,但大多数项目都提供选修课。这些结果表明,在APP学位课程中增加神经学教育的机会,包括鼓励学生参加临床神经学轮转和增加APP实践神经学的机会。这些发现还为研究生教育计划的主要目标提供了信息。
{"title":"Education Research: Neurologic Education in Physician Assistant Programs","authors":"Daniel S. Harrison, M. Naclerio, Kathryn Swider, C. Garrubba, A.T. Yu, Andrew Busler, Lena Liu, Christopher Doughty","doi":"10.1212/ne9.0000000000200029","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1212/ne9.0000000000200029","url":null,"abstract":"A growing number of advanced practice providers (APPs) are entering neurologic practice, and educational initiatives focused on postgraduate training in neurology for these providers are growing in turn. Neurologic education in APP degree programs is not well defined, which limits the ability to tailor these initiatives to the specific needs of APPs. We aim to describe neurologic education in physician assistant (PA) degree programs to better inform these efforts.The 2018 American Academy of Neurology clerkship director survey was adapted for directors of PA programs via an iterative approach. The survey was distributed to program directors (PDs) of accredited programs in Fall 2021 and again in Spring 2022 for nonresponders. Simultaneously, websites of accredited programs were systematically reviewed for content related to neurologic education.Sixty of 255 contacted PDs completed the survey (23.5%). All PDs reported education in selected neuroscience topics. Neuroradiology instruction was included less frequently (66.7%) than neuroanatomy (91.7%) or neurologic examination techniques (95.0%). Twenty-six PDs (43.3%) reported a dedicated neuroscience course; 53 of 260 websites reviewed identified dedicated neuroscience courses (20.8%,k= 0.41). Directors of 10 (38.5%) reported neuroscience courses were neuroscience trained. Only 1 program required a neurology clinical rotation in both the website review (0.4%) and the PD survey (1.7%,k= 1.00). Elective neurology rotations were offered by 51 programs (85.0%) and used by less than 20% of students in 46 programs (92.0%). More programs with dedicated neuroscience didactics (80.0% vs 74.2%) and offerings in clinical neurology (78.7% vs 66.7%) reported graduates pursuing careers in neurology, but these differences were not statistically significant.Survey respondents reported the inclusion of most of the queried preclinical neuroscience topics, typically distributed throughout the curriculum. Dedicated neuroscience courses were less common and most commonly not taught by a neurologist or neurology APP. Clinical neurology rotations are almost never required, but most programs offer an elective. These results suggest opportunities for augmenting neurologic education in APP degree programs, including encouraging students to take clinical neurology rotations and increasing exposure to APPs practicing neurology. These findings additionally inform key targets for postgraduate educational initiatives.","PeriodicalId":273801,"journal":{"name":"Neurology: Education","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126330479","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-01DOI: 10.1212/ne9.0000000000200036
Catherine Albin
Simulation is a highly engaging methodology for both teaching and assessment. Yet simulation frameworks, techniques, and procedures have largely been developed and investigated outside of the neurologic context
{"title":"Attaining Base Camp","authors":"Catherine Albin","doi":"10.1212/ne9.0000000000200036","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1212/ne9.0000000000200036","url":null,"abstract":"Simulation is a highly engaging methodology for both teaching and assessment. Yet simulation frameworks, techniques, and procedures have largely been developed and investigated outside of the neurologic context","PeriodicalId":273801,"journal":{"name":"Neurology: Education","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126442083","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-11-30DOI: 10.1212/ne9.0000000000200035
Giovanni Di Liberto, Giuseppina Baldizzi, V. Carvalho, Luca Cuffaro, A. Sauerbier, L. Klingelhoefer, N. Vashchenko, Lucia Pavlakova, Anja Sander, M. de Visser, P. Boon, E. Moro, C. Bassetti
To investigate the prevalence of burnout profiles and their contributing factors in European neurology residents, junior neurologists, and research fellows.The members of the Resident and Research Fellow Section (RRFS) of the European Academy of Neurology were surveyed using standardized instruments for burnout, job satisfaction, social support, depression, work-related fatigue, work-life integration, and impact of life events, from September 1, 2020, to January 6, 2021.The response rate was 23.1% (332 responders of 1,439 contacted RRFS members); the median age of participants 30 years, with 61.5% being female. Our analysis revealed that 73.9% of the responders showed a perturbation in the Maslach Burnout Inventory dimensions, thus fulfilling the criteria for a dysfunctional phenotype within the burnout spectrum: burnout (22.6%), overextended (26.1%), ineffective (21.0%), and disengaged (4.1%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that elevated number of night shifts per month, work-related fatigue, and low professional satisfaction are independent risk factors for burnout. Being a certified neurologist, working in an academic environment, and a higher job satisfaction are associated with the engaged profile, a productive state characterized by high energy, strong involvement, and a sense of efficacy.Burnout experience is highly prevalent among neurology residents, junior neurologists, and research fellows in Europe. The profile-based approach in this survey captures the multifaceted nature of burnout experience, therefore highlighting mitigating strategies that can be tailored to the distinct dysfunctional burnout profile.
目的:调查欧洲神经科住院医师、初级神经科医师和研究人员中职业倦怠的患病率及其影响因素。从2020年9月1日至2021年1月6日,欧洲神经病学学会(European Academy of Neurology)驻地和研究员科(RRFS)的成员使用标准化工具对倦怠、工作满意度、社会支持、抑郁、与工作有关的疲劳、工作与生活的融合以及生活事件的影响进行了调查。应答率为23.1%(1439名联系的RRFS成员中有332名应答者);参与者的年龄中位数为30岁,其中61.5%为女性。我们的分析显示,73.9%的应答者在Maslach倦怠量表维度上表现出扰动,从而满足倦怠谱中功能失调表型的标准:倦怠(22.6%),过度延伸(26.1%),无效(21.0%)和不投入(4.1%)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,每月夜班次数增加、工作疲劳、职业满意度低是职业倦怠的独立危险因素。作为一名经过认证的神经科医生,在学术环境中工作,以及更高的工作满意度与敬业的形象有关,这是一种以高能量、强烈参与和效能感为特征的生产状态。在欧洲,神经内科住院医师、初级神经科医生和研究人员中,职业倦怠的经历非常普遍。本调查中基于档案的方法抓住了倦怠体验的多面性,因此突出了可以针对不同功能失调的倦怠档案量身定制的缓解策略。
{"title":"Education Research: Impact of Burnout on Neurology Residents and Research Fellows in Europe","authors":"Giovanni Di Liberto, Giuseppina Baldizzi, V. Carvalho, Luca Cuffaro, A. Sauerbier, L. Klingelhoefer, N. Vashchenko, Lucia Pavlakova, Anja Sander, M. de Visser, P. Boon, E. Moro, C. Bassetti","doi":"10.1212/ne9.0000000000200035","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1212/ne9.0000000000200035","url":null,"abstract":"To investigate the prevalence of burnout profiles and their contributing factors in European neurology residents, junior neurologists, and research fellows.The members of the Resident and Research Fellow Section (RRFS) of the European Academy of Neurology were surveyed using standardized instruments for burnout, job satisfaction, social support, depression, work-related fatigue, work-life integration, and impact of life events, from September 1, 2020, to January 6, 2021.The response rate was 23.1% (332 responders of 1,439 contacted RRFS members); the median age of participants 30 years, with 61.5% being female. Our analysis revealed that 73.9% of the responders showed a perturbation in the Maslach Burnout Inventory dimensions, thus fulfilling the criteria for a dysfunctional phenotype within the burnout spectrum: burnout (22.6%), overextended (26.1%), ineffective (21.0%), and disengaged (4.1%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that elevated number of night shifts per month, work-related fatigue, and low professional satisfaction are independent risk factors for burnout. Being a certified neurologist, working in an academic environment, and a higher job satisfaction are associated with the engaged profile, a productive state characterized by high energy, strong involvement, and a sense of efficacy.Burnout experience is highly prevalent among neurology residents, junior neurologists, and research fellows in Europe. The profile-based approach in this survey captures the multifaceted nature of burnout experience, therefore highlighting mitigating strategies that can be tailored to the distinct dysfunctional burnout profile.","PeriodicalId":273801,"journal":{"name":"Neurology: Education","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117327087","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-11-30DOI: 10.1212/ne9.0000000000200021
MD EdM Sonya Taryn Gleicher, MD Caroline Jeanette Hurd, MD P. Annie Weisner, PhD Ali Marisa Mendelson, C. J. Md, MD Breana L. Taylor
Neuropalliative care is an emerging interprofessional field that aims to improve communication and quality of life for all people affected by serious neurologic disease. Teaching neuropalliative care skills is a key objective for neurology residencies, and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requires proficiency in palliative care. The objective of this study was to describe a novel longitudinal multimodal curriculum in neuropalliative care communication and evaluate its feasibility and outcomes.We designed a multimodal curriculum focused on neuropalliative care communication skills using as our theoretical foundation transformative learning theory. We implemented this program for neurology residents at a single academic institution over the course of their 3-year training. Residents underwent (1) 3 communication workshops using VitalTalk modules and simulated patient encounters, (2) 3 or more observed clinical encounters with structured faculty feedback, and (3) at least 3 annual neuropalliative care lectures. We evaluated the effect on learners' self-assessed confidence in neuropalliative care skills with preworkshop and postworkshop questionnaires.In 2021, 14 of 20 eligible residents attended our workshops and completed the preworkshop questionnaire, and 12 of those completed the postworkshop questionnaire. After the workshop, a larger proportion of residents (75%, 9/12) agreed or strongly agreed that they felt confident leading family meetings compared with before the workshop (57%, 8/14). While more than 90% of residents felt confident recognizing patient and family emotions both before and after the workshop, the workshop improved their confidence in responding to such emotions. Still, some residents neither agreed nor disagreed (42%, 5/12) about feeling confident in responding to emotions after the workshop, and many commented on wanting more training in this area.The successful implementation and high attendance among eligible participants demonstrate the feasibility of our longitudinal multimodal neuropalliative care curriculum. The evaluation of intervention outcomes suggests that residents' confidence in neuropalliative communication skills improved. Our study shows that VitalTalk is a tool that can be adapted to teach neuropalliative communication skills for neurology residents, and this program can be easily adopted by other neurology training programs.
{"title":"Curriculum Innovations: Implementing a Neuropalliative Care Curriculum for Neurology Residents","authors":"MD EdM Sonya Taryn Gleicher, MD Caroline Jeanette Hurd, MD P. Annie Weisner, PhD Ali Marisa Mendelson, C. J. Md, MD Breana L. Taylor","doi":"10.1212/ne9.0000000000200021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1212/ne9.0000000000200021","url":null,"abstract":"Neuropalliative care is an emerging interprofessional field that aims to improve communication and quality of life for all people affected by serious neurologic disease. Teaching neuropalliative care skills is a key objective for neurology residencies, and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requires proficiency in palliative care. The objective of this study was to describe a novel longitudinal multimodal curriculum in neuropalliative care communication and evaluate its feasibility and outcomes.We designed a multimodal curriculum focused on neuropalliative care communication skills using as our theoretical foundation transformative learning theory. We implemented this program for neurology residents at a single academic institution over the course of their 3-year training. Residents underwent (1) 3 communication workshops using VitalTalk modules and simulated patient encounters, (2) 3 or more observed clinical encounters with structured faculty feedback, and (3) at least 3 annual neuropalliative care lectures. We evaluated the effect on learners' self-assessed confidence in neuropalliative care skills with preworkshop and postworkshop questionnaires.In 2021, 14 of 20 eligible residents attended our workshops and completed the preworkshop questionnaire, and 12 of those completed the postworkshop questionnaire. After the workshop, a larger proportion of residents (75%, 9/12) agreed or strongly agreed that they felt confident leading family meetings compared with before the workshop (57%, 8/14). While more than 90% of residents felt confident recognizing patient and family emotions both before and after the workshop, the workshop improved their confidence in responding to such emotions. Still, some residents neither agreed nor disagreed (42%, 5/12) about feeling confident in responding to emotions after the workshop, and many commented on wanting more training in this area.The successful implementation and high attendance among eligible participants demonstrate the feasibility of our longitudinal multimodal neuropalliative care curriculum. The evaluation of intervention outcomes suggests that residents' confidence in neuropalliative communication skills improved. Our study shows that VitalTalk is a tool that can be adapted to teach neuropalliative communication skills for neurology residents, and this program can be easily adopted by other neurology training programs.","PeriodicalId":273801,"journal":{"name":"Neurology: Education","volume":"268 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127375792","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-11-30DOI: 10.1212/ne9.0000000000200038
R. Strowd
In this second issue of Neurology ® Education , readers will fi nd articles grouped in 3 sections. Each section addresses a timely question for educators in clinical neuroscience, including the following: (1) how can simulation be used to optimally teach or assess learners, (2) how can residency training adapt to increase the breadth and depth of outpatient exposure
{"title":"Finding Flourishing in Neurology","authors":"R. Strowd","doi":"10.1212/ne9.0000000000200038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1212/ne9.0000000000200038","url":null,"abstract":"In this second issue of Neurology ® Education , readers will fi nd articles grouped in 3 sections. Each section addresses a timely question for educators in clinical neuroscience, including the following: (1) how can simulation be used to optimally teach or assess learners, (2) how can residency training adapt to increase the breadth and depth of outpatient exposure","PeriodicalId":273801,"journal":{"name":"Neurology: Education","volume":"105 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131374589","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-11-18DOI: 10.1212/ne9.0000000000200017
Shuvro Roy, Katherine A. Fu, T. Ryan, Y. Bordelon, C. Flippen, A. Keener
There is a need for earlier outpatient exposure in neurology training. In 2017, 56% of residents on the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) Graduating Resident Survey reported that they felt that the fellowship process started too early, and 46% felt that they did not have adequate outpatient exposure before making a fellowship decision. In addition, the traditional front-loaded resident schedule may contribute to high rates of burnout due to greater work hours and heavier inpatient load, as was suggested in the findings of a 2016 AAN survey comparing burnout among residents and fellows.We created an X + Y model within the UCLA Neurology Residency Program in the 2020–2021 academic year with the goal of increasing outpatient exposure earlier in training. We used a preintervention/postintervention design assessing measures of resident satisfaction, outpatient clinic exposure, number of inpatient handoffs, resident work hours, and scores on the resident in-training examination (RITE). We hypothesized that outpatient clinic exposure would increase, handoffs would diminish, work hours would be reduced, measures of resident satisfaction with inpatient care, outpatient care, and well-being would improve, and that RITE scores would improve. Work hours, handoffs, and number of clinic days were compared across each year via analysis of the resident schedule. Resident perceptions were obtained via an online survey at the end of their PGY-2 year. RITE scores were compared across a variety of subspecialties.In the postintervention year, handoffs were reduced by 6.13 (95% CI 4.73–7.54) per week. Average clinic half-days increased by 4.51 (95% CI 7.76–0.53). Resident responses regarding their outpatient experience improved from 42% to 93% satisfied and from 60% to 94% satisfied for their inpatient experience. There was no difference in average work hours per week before and after the intervention. Regarding resident well-being, responses improved from 42% satisfied in the traditional model to 96% in the X + Y model. Among the RITE subjects covering primarily outpatient subspecialties, scores improved in each category.After implementation of an X + Y model, we observed an improvement in outpatient exposure, learning and career satisfaction, and resident education on subspecialty topics.
在神经学培训中有必要进行早期的门诊接触。2017年,在美国神经病学学会(AAN)毕业住院医师调查中,56%的住院医师报告说,他们觉得奖学金过程开始得太早,46%的人认为他们在做出奖学金决定之前没有充分的门诊接触。此外,正如2016年AAN调查结果所显示的那样,由于更长的工作时间和更重的住院负荷,传统的提前负荷住院医生的时间表可能会导致高倦怠率。我们在2020-2021学年在加州大学洛杉矶分校神经病学住院医师项目中创建了一个X + Y模型,目标是在培训的早期增加门诊患者的接触。我们采用干预前/干预后设计,评估住院医生满意度、门诊就诊、住院病人转诊次数、住院医生工作时间和住院医生培训考试(RITE)分数。我们假设门诊暴露会增加,交接会减少,工作时间会减少,住院医生对住院治疗、门诊治疗和幸福感的满意度会提高,RITE评分也会提高。通过对住院医生时间表的分析,对每年的工作时间、交接时间和门诊天数进行了比较。居民的看法是在他们的PGY-2年结束时通过在线调查获得的。RITE评分在不同的亚专科之间进行比较。在干预后的一年中,每周的交接减少了6.13例(95% CI 4.73-7.54)。平均门诊半天增加4.51天(95% CI 7.76-0.53)。居民对门诊体验的满意度从42%提高到93%,对住院体验的满意度从60%提高到94%。干预前后的每周平均工作时间没有差异。在居民幸福感方面,满意度从传统模型中的42%提高到X + Y模型中的96%。在RITE主要覆盖门诊亚专科的科目中,每个类别的得分都有所提高。在实施X + Y模型后,我们观察到门诊就诊次数、学习和职业满意度以及住院医师对亚专科主题的教育有所改善。
{"title":"Education Research: The Effect of an X + Y Schedule Model on Neurology Residency Training","authors":"Shuvro Roy, Katherine A. Fu, T. Ryan, Y. Bordelon, C. Flippen, A. Keener","doi":"10.1212/ne9.0000000000200017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1212/ne9.0000000000200017","url":null,"abstract":"There is a need for earlier outpatient exposure in neurology training. In 2017, 56% of residents on the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) Graduating Resident Survey reported that they felt that the fellowship process started too early, and 46% felt that they did not have adequate outpatient exposure before making a fellowship decision. In addition, the traditional front-loaded resident schedule may contribute to high rates of burnout due to greater work hours and heavier inpatient load, as was suggested in the findings of a 2016 AAN survey comparing burnout among residents and fellows.We created an X + Y model within the UCLA Neurology Residency Program in the 2020–2021 academic year with the goal of increasing outpatient exposure earlier in training. We used a preintervention/postintervention design assessing measures of resident satisfaction, outpatient clinic exposure, number of inpatient handoffs, resident work hours, and scores on the resident in-training examination (RITE). We hypothesized that outpatient clinic exposure would increase, handoffs would diminish, work hours would be reduced, measures of resident satisfaction with inpatient care, outpatient care, and well-being would improve, and that RITE scores would improve. Work hours, handoffs, and number of clinic days were compared across each year via analysis of the resident schedule. Resident perceptions were obtained via an online survey at the end of their PGY-2 year. RITE scores were compared across a variety of subspecialties.In the postintervention year, handoffs were reduced by 6.13 (95% CI 4.73–7.54) per week. Average clinic half-days increased by 4.51 (95% CI 7.76–0.53). Resident responses regarding their outpatient experience improved from 42% to 93% satisfied and from 60% to 94% satisfied for their inpatient experience. There was no difference in average work hours per week before and after the intervention. Regarding resident well-being, responses improved from 42% satisfied in the traditional model to 96% in the X + Y model. Among the RITE subjects covering primarily outpatient subspecialties, scores improved in each category.After implementation of an X + Y model, we observed an improvement in outpatient exposure, learning and career satisfaction, and resident education on subspecialty topics.","PeriodicalId":273801,"journal":{"name":"Neurology: Education","volume":"8 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131958290","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-11-17DOI: 10.1212/ne9.0000000000200020
Melissa B. Pergakis, Wan-Tsu W. Chang, Camilo A. Gutierrez, Benjamin Neustein, Jamie E. Podell, Gunjan Y. Parikh, N. Badjatia, Melissa Motta, David P. Lerner, Nicholas A. Morris
Delays in treatment of both herpes simplex virus (HSV) encephalitis and seizures are associated with poor patient outcomes, but many physicians fail to recognize HSV despite classic presenting symptoms. Our goal was to assess trainee performance in a simulation-based case to recognize HSV encephalitis as the underlying etiology of refractory status epilepticus.This is a prospective, observational, single-center simulation-based study of participants ranging from subinterns to attending physicians managing a patient with viral encephalitis complicated by nonconvulsive status epilepticus. Using a modified Delphi approach, we developed a list of critical actions. The primary outcome measure was critical action item sum score. We compared level of training and performance using analysis of variance as validity evidence to support our findings.Fifty-nine trainees completed the simulation. The mean sum of critical actions completed was 13.9/25 (56%). Eighty percent of trainees administered an appropriately dosed benzodiazepine, and 97% administered a second-line agent. Despite 88% of trainees obtaining a lumbar puncture, only 47% recognized viral encephalitis as the most likely diagnosis with 36% starting appropriate treatment. There was significant effect of training level on critical action sum score (level 1 mean score [SD] = 10.8 [1.5] vs level 2 mean score [SD] = 12.2 [2.5] vs level 3 mean score [SD] = 13.9 [3.0] vs level 4 mean score [SD] = 18.2 [3.2],p< 0.001,R2= 0.38).Although initial seizure treatment was sufficient, failure to recognize HSV encephalitis was common with few trainees initiating appropriate treatment potentially leading to poor outcomes in real-life scenarios. High-fidelity simulation holds promise as an assessment tool in identifying trainee knowledge gaps and why classic clinical cases escape trainee diagnosis.
{"title":"Education Research: High-Fidelity Simulation to Evaluate Diagnostic Reasoning Reveals Failure to Detect Viral Encephalitis in Medical Trainees","authors":"Melissa B. Pergakis, Wan-Tsu W. Chang, Camilo A. Gutierrez, Benjamin Neustein, Jamie E. Podell, Gunjan Y. Parikh, N. Badjatia, Melissa Motta, David P. Lerner, Nicholas A. Morris","doi":"10.1212/ne9.0000000000200020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1212/ne9.0000000000200020","url":null,"abstract":"Delays in treatment of both herpes simplex virus (HSV) encephalitis and seizures are associated with poor patient outcomes, but many physicians fail to recognize HSV despite classic presenting symptoms. Our goal was to assess trainee performance in a simulation-based case to recognize HSV encephalitis as the underlying etiology of refractory status epilepticus.This is a prospective, observational, single-center simulation-based study of participants ranging from subinterns to attending physicians managing a patient with viral encephalitis complicated by nonconvulsive status epilepticus. Using a modified Delphi approach, we developed a list of critical actions. The primary outcome measure was critical action item sum score. We compared level of training and performance using analysis of variance as validity evidence to support our findings.Fifty-nine trainees completed the simulation. The mean sum of critical actions completed was 13.9/25 (56%). Eighty percent of trainees administered an appropriately dosed benzodiazepine, and 97% administered a second-line agent. Despite 88% of trainees obtaining a lumbar puncture, only 47% recognized viral encephalitis as the most likely diagnosis with 36% starting appropriate treatment. There was significant effect of training level on critical action sum score (level 1 mean score [SD] = 10.8 [1.5] vs level 2 mean score [SD] = 12.2 [2.5] vs level 3 mean score [SD] = 13.9 [3.0] vs level 4 mean score [SD] = 18.2 [3.2],p< 0.001,R2= 0.38).Although initial seizure treatment was sufficient, failure to recognize HSV encephalitis was common with few trainees initiating appropriate treatment potentially leading to poor outcomes in real-life scenarios. High-fidelity simulation holds promise as an assessment tool in identifying trainee knowledge gaps and why classic clinical cases escape trainee diagnosis.","PeriodicalId":273801,"journal":{"name":"Neurology: Education","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123024451","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-11-15DOI: 10.1212/ne9.0000000000200022
Zahari N. Tchopev, Alexis E. Nelson, J. Hunninghake, Kelsey Cacic, Melissa K. Cook, Morgan C. Jordan
The matriculation from internal medicine to neurology residency can be challenging. The most cogent approach to address this transition has yet to be identified. Studies show that simulation is highly effective at reinforcing knowledge and skills while improving learner confidence. We present the design and outcomes of an annual acute neurology simulation program.We hypothesized that incoming neurology residents would (1) report improved confidence with managing acute neurologic emergencies, (2) cite a high degree of educational value with the program, and (3) demonstrate improvement in their technical knowledge.Our military, level 1 trauma institution's simulation laboratory and staff were used to develop and execute simulations for rising neurology residents based on the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education neurology milestones. Three simulations were designed including a case of acute ischemic stroke (AIS), status epilepticus (SE) in an austere environment, and brain death evaluation with family counseling. Residents completed matched pre‐ and post assessments to gauge confidence, technical knowledge, and perceived educational value.Over 3 years, 15 rising neurology residents from 2 training programs completed 3 high-fidelity acute neurology cases. Self-reported confidence with acute neurology skills improved after each simulation. Confidence ratings included assessing for and identifying contraindications to tissue plasminogen activator, identifying AIS, identifying clot retrieval candidates, identifying clinical and electrographic SE, diagnosing and treating SE, identifying contraindications to and confounders of brain death diagnosis, performing the examination, and delivering bad news to families (allp< 0.05). Technical knowledge also statistically improved in the stroke (p= 0.046) and brain death simulation (p= 0.039), but not the SE simulation (p= 0.296). Participants reported an average perceived personal value of 4.8, 4.3, and 4.7 (out of a maximum of 5) for AIS, SE, and brain death simulations, respectively.High-fidelity simulation of neurologic emergencies enhances confidence and knowledge of rising neurology residents. Satisfaction with the simulation cases was high. Academic hospitals can consider incorporating acute neurology simulations into their residency training.
{"title":"Curriculum Innovations: High-Fidelity Simulation of Acute Neurology Enhances Rising Resident Confidence","authors":"Zahari N. Tchopev, Alexis E. Nelson, J. Hunninghake, Kelsey Cacic, Melissa K. Cook, Morgan C. Jordan","doi":"10.1212/ne9.0000000000200022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1212/ne9.0000000000200022","url":null,"abstract":"The matriculation from internal medicine to neurology residency can be challenging. The most cogent approach to address this transition has yet to be identified. Studies show that simulation is highly effective at reinforcing knowledge and skills while improving learner confidence. We present the design and outcomes of an annual acute neurology simulation program.We hypothesized that incoming neurology residents would (1) report improved confidence with managing acute neurologic emergencies, (2) cite a high degree of educational value with the program, and (3) demonstrate improvement in their technical knowledge.Our military, level 1 trauma institution's simulation laboratory and staff were used to develop and execute simulations for rising neurology residents based on the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education neurology milestones. Three simulations were designed including a case of acute ischemic stroke (AIS), status epilepticus (SE) in an austere environment, and brain death evaluation with family counseling. Residents completed matched pre‐ and post assessments to gauge confidence, technical knowledge, and perceived educational value.Over 3 years, 15 rising neurology residents from 2 training programs completed 3 high-fidelity acute neurology cases. Self-reported confidence with acute neurology skills improved after each simulation. Confidence ratings included assessing for and identifying contraindications to tissue plasminogen activator, identifying AIS, identifying clot retrieval candidates, identifying clinical and electrographic SE, diagnosing and treating SE, identifying contraindications to and confounders of brain death diagnosis, performing the examination, and delivering bad news to families (allp< 0.05). Technical knowledge also statistically improved in the stroke (p= 0.046) and brain death simulation (p= 0.039), but not the SE simulation (p= 0.296). Participants reported an average perceived personal value of 4.8, 4.3, and 4.7 (out of a maximum of 5) for AIS, SE, and brain death simulations, respectively.High-fidelity simulation of neurologic emergencies enhances confidence and knowledge of rising neurology residents. Satisfaction with the simulation cases was high. Academic hospitals can consider incorporating acute neurology simulations into their residency training.","PeriodicalId":273801,"journal":{"name":"Neurology: Education","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122684951","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-11-15DOI: 10.1212/ne9.0000000000200018
H. N. Lemus, B. Dworetzky, E. Bubrick, G. Cosgrove, Steven Tobochnik
To assess the scope of surgical epilepsy exposure and training among fellows in Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology (CNP) fellowship programs in the United States. Characteristics associated with increased fellow involvement in epilepsy surgery were evaluated.A 10-question multiple-choice survey was designed to characterize individual fellowship programs, epilepsy surgery programs, trainee involvement, and assessment of trainee performance. The survey was distributed to program directors of adult Epilepsy and CNP-EEG track fellowships between November 2021 and April 2022. Epilepsy surgery procedures included resective approaches, neurostimulation modalities, and palliative interventions approved for drug-resistant epilepsy. Associations between categorical variables were evaluated using the Fisher exact test.There were 37 responses from a total of 72 survey recipients (51% response rate). The majority (68%) of surgical programs performed >30 surgical procedures per year. The range of procedures was overall similar across programs. At most programs, fellows were personally involved in 1–10 (49%) or 11–30 (46%) surgical procedures per year. Institutions with >50 surgical cases/year were more likely to expose fellows to >10 cases/y compared with institutions with volumes ≤50 per year (77% vs 33%,p= 0.017). Fellows had the greatest involvement in presurgical planning with more variable involvement in perioperative and postoperative activities. Competency in surgical management was primarily investigated through faculty assessments (97%), whereas oral (46%) and written (30%) assessments were less frequently used.High-volume epilepsy surgery centers provide trainees with increased exposure despite also having more fellowship positions. There is variability in surgical epilepsy exposure, trainee involvement, and performance evaluation metrics between institutions. We identify specific areas that programs may focus on to improve fellow competency in the surgical management of epilepsy.
评估美国癫痫和临床神经生理学(CNP)奖学金项目研究员的手术癫痫暴露和培训范围。评估与癫痫手术中同伴参与增加相关的特征。设计了一项10道选择题调查,以描述个别奖学金项目、癫痫手术项目、学员参与情况以及学员表现评估。该调查于2021年11月至2022年4月期间分发给成人癫痫和CNP-EEG跟踪奖学金的项目主任。癫痫手术程序包括相应的方法,神经刺激方式和姑息性干预批准用于耐药癫痫。使用Fisher精确检验评估分类变量之间的关联。共有72名调查对象回复了37份(51%的回复率)。大多数(68%)的外科项目每年进行超过30次手术。程序的范围总体上是相似的。在大多数项目中,研究员每年亲自参与1-10例(49%)或11-30例(46%)外科手术。与每年手术病例数≤50例的机构相比,每年手术病例数>50例的机构更有可能让研究员接触到>10例(77% vs 33%,p= 0.017)。研究员参与术前计划最多,参与围手术期和术后活动较多。手术管理能力主要通过教师评估进行调查(97%),而口头评估(46%)和书面评估(30%)较少使用。大容量癫痫手术中心为受训者提供了更多的接触机会,同时也提供了更多的奖学金职位。不同机构在手术癫痫暴露、受训者参与和绩效评估指标方面存在差异。我们确定具体的领域,程序可能会集中在提高同事的能力在癫痫手术管理。
{"title":"Education Research: Evaluation of Epilepsy Surgery Education in Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology Fellowship Programs","authors":"H. N. Lemus, B. Dworetzky, E. Bubrick, G. Cosgrove, Steven Tobochnik","doi":"10.1212/ne9.0000000000200018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1212/ne9.0000000000200018","url":null,"abstract":"To assess the scope of surgical epilepsy exposure and training among fellows in Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology (CNP) fellowship programs in the United States. Characteristics associated with increased fellow involvement in epilepsy surgery were evaluated.A 10-question multiple-choice survey was designed to characterize individual fellowship programs, epilepsy surgery programs, trainee involvement, and assessment of trainee performance. The survey was distributed to program directors of adult Epilepsy and CNP-EEG track fellowships between November 2021 and April 2022. Epilepsy surgery procedures included resective approaches, neurostimulation modalities, and palliative interventions approved for drug-resistant epilepsy. Associations between categorical variables were evaluated using the Fisher exact test.There were 37 responses from a total of 72 survey recipients (51% response rate). The majority (68%) of surgical programs performed >30 surgical procedures per year. The range of procedures was overall similar across programs. At most programs, fellows were personally involved in 1–10 (49%) or 11–30 (46%) surgical procedures per year. Institutions with >50 surgical cases/year were more likely to expose fellows to >10 cases/y compared with institutions with volumes ≤50 per year (77% vs 33%,p= 0.017). Fellows had the greatest involvement in presurgical planning with more variable involvement in perioperative and postoperative activities. Competency in surgical management was primarily investigated through faculty assessments (97%), whereas oral (46%) and written (30%) assessments were less frequently used.High-volume epilepsy surgery centers provide trainees with increased exposure despite also having more fellowship positions. There is variability in surgical epilepsy exposure, trainee involvement, and performance evaluation metrics between institutions. We identify specific areas that programs may focus on to improve fellow competency in the surgical management of epilepsy.","PeriodicalId":273801,"journal":{"name":"Neurology: Education","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125940660","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-09-01DOI: 10.1212/ne9.0000000000200011
S. Lewis
{"title":"Neurology®EducationFulfilling an Age Old Mantra in Medicine","authors":"S. Lewis","doi":"10.1212/ne9.0000000000200011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1212/ne9.0000000000200011","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":273801,"journal":{"name":"Neurology: Education","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122825117","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}