首页 > 最新文献

The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law最新文献

英文 中文
The Failure by Italy to Ratify Protocol no. 16 to the ECHR 意大利没有批准第2号议定书。《欧洲人权公约》第16条
Pub Date : 2021-10-15 DOI: 10.1163/27725650-01010009
E. Lamarque
When deciding to authorise the ratification of Protocol no. 15 to the echr, the Italian Parliament at the same time blocked adherence to Protocol no. 16. The author examines the reasons of refusal and explains why these reasons are completely unfounded, hoping that all doubts will be resolved and that the Protocol no. 16 will be ratified by Italy in a not too distant future.
在决定授权批准第1号议定书时。第15号议定书,意大利议会同时阻止遵守第15号议定书。16. 发件人审查了拒绝的理由,并解释了为什么这些理由是完全没有根据的,希望所有的疑问都将得到解决,并希望第2号议定书。在不久的将来,意大利将批准16个条约。
{"title":"The Failure by Italy to Ratify Protocol no. 16 to the ECHR","authors":"E. Lamarque","doi":"10.1163/27725650-01010009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/27725650-01010009","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000When deciding to authorise the ratification of Protocol no. 15 to the echr, the Italian Parliament at the same time blocked adherence to Protocol no. 16. The author examines the reasons of refusal and explains why these reasons are completely unfounded, hoping that all doubts will be resolved and that the Protocol no. 16 will be ratified by Italy in a not too distant future.","PeriodicalId":275877,"journal":{"name":"The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130869803","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Italian Theory of Comparative Law Goes Abroad 意大利比较法理论走向国外
Pub Date : 2021-10-15 DOI: 10.1163/27725650-01010002
E. Grande, R. M. Núñez, P. Monateri
The aim of this paper is to assess the influence of the Italian comparative law scholarship outside its national boundaries, and particularly in Latin America, where it has had its strongest impact. In order to achieve our goal we will start by sketching a picture of the current status of the Italian comparative law, tracing its roots, explaining its development and analyzing its weaknesses and strengths. After exploring its reception in South America, we will ultimately try to envisage the future challenges, directions and contributions of the Italian Theory – as we labeled the Italian comparative law “way”.
本文的目的是评估意大利比较法学术在其国界之外的影响,特别是在拉丁美洲,在那里它产生了最大的影响。为了实现我们的目标,我们将首先概述意大利比较法的现状,追溯其根源,解释其发展并分析其弱点和长处。在探讨了意大利比较法在南美洲的接受程度之后,我们将最终尝试设想意大利理论未来的挑战、方向和贡献——正如我们所称的意大利比较法的“方式”。
{"title":"The Italian Theory of Comparative Law Goes Abroad","authors":"E. Grande, R. M. Núñez, P. Monateri","doi":"10.1163/27725650-01010002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/27725650-01010002","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000The aim of this paper is to assess the influence of the Italian comparative law scholarship outside its national boundaries, and particularly in Latin America, where it has had its strongest impact. In order to achieve our goal we will start by sketching a picture of the current status of the Italian comparative law, tracing its roots, explaining its development and analyzing its weaknesses and strengths. After exploring its reception in South America, we will ultimately try to envisage the future challenges, directions and contributions of the Italian Theory – as we labeled the Italian comparative law “way”.","PeriodicalId":275877,"journal":{"name":"The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126085461","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The development of international law through the lens of the Italian doctrine 从意大利学说的视角看国际法的发展
Pub Date : 2021-10-15 DOI: 10.1163/27725650-01010011
M. Iovane
This review essay analyses a very interesting collection of essays providing a fresh examination of international law schools operating in Italy from the early medieval period to current times. The Essay will show that the book adopts a completely new presentation of this subject, offering thus an unbiased assessment of the doctrinal debate developed in between the two World Wars.
这篇评论文章分析了一个非常有趣的文集,为从中世纪早期到现在在意大利运作的国际法学院提供了一个新的审视。文章将表明,这本书采用了一个全新的介绍,这一主题,从而提供了一个公正的评估,在两次世界大战之间发展的理论辩论。
{"title":"The development of international law through the lens of the Italian doctrine","authors":"M. Iovane","doi":"10.1163/27725650-01010011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/27725650-01010011","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000This review essay analyses a very interesting collection of essays providing a fresh examination of international law schools operating in Italy from the early medieval period to current times. The Essay will show that the book adopts a completely new presentation of this subject, offering thus an unbiased assessment of the doctrinal debate developed in between the two World Wars.","PeriodicalId":275877,"journal":{"name":"The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129592141","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Adoption v. Surrogacy: New Perspectives on the Parental Projects of Same-Sex Couples 收养与代孕:同性伴侣育儿计划的新视角
Pub Date : 2021-10-15 DOI: 10.1163/27725650-01010007
S. Tonolo
In Italy all forms of surrogacy are forbidden, whether it be traditional or gestational, commercial or altruistic. Act n. 40 of 19/2/2004, entitled “Rules about medically-assisted reproduction”, introduces a prohibition on employing gametes from donors, and specifically incriminates not only intermediary agencies and clinics practising surrogacy, but also the intended parents and the surrogate mother too. Other penal consequences are provided by the Criminal Code about the registration of a birth certificate where parents are the intended ones, as provided by the lex loci actus (art. 567 of the Italian Criminal Code, concerning the false representation or concealment of status). Apart from the mentioned criminal problems, several aspects of private international law are involved. In the cases where national rules forbid the transcription of birth certificates for public policy reasons, specifically the prohibition of surrogacy, Italian Judges often seek solutions to enforce the status filiationis. In this case, the Italian Supreme Court intervenes in the debate, allowing the recognition of a foreign adoption order related to a procedure of surrogate motherhood in favour of a same-sex couple. Focusing on the recent evolution of the notion of international public policy the Supreme Court affirms that the inherent adoptive parental status acquired by a homogenitorial couple is not contrary to international public policy, when the effects of the act from which this status derives are not incompatible with the limits that cannot be exceeded constituted by the founding principles of the relational choices between intended parents and child (Article 2 of the Constitution, Article 8 ECHR), by the Best interest of the child as codified in the Italian Law 219/2012, by the principle of non-discrimination, by the principle of solidarity that is the basis of social parenting. Splitting the problem of the surrogacy, underlying the adoption order to recognize in this case, and narrowing the public policy exception, is highly evident the risk to suggest to same-sex couples to realize their parental projects putting in place the surrogacy within the legal systems where contemporary it is possible to carry out the adoption of the child born as a result of this procedure.
在意大利,所有形式的代孕都是被禁止的,无论是传统的还是怀孕的,商业的还是利他的。2004年2月19日题为“医疗辅助生殖规则”的第40号法禁止使用捐赠者的配子,明确规定,不仅中介机构和诊所从事代孕,而且准父母和代孕母亲也被列为犯罪。《刑法》规定了其他刑事后果,如根据《行为地法》的规定,父母是准父母的出生证明的登记(第2条)。《意大利刑法》第567条(关于虚假陈述或隐瞒身份)。除了上述的刑事问题外,还涉及国际私法的几个方面。在国家规则出于公共政策原因,特别是禁止代孕而禁止出生证明抄录的情况下,意大利法官往往寻求解决办法来执行身份关联。在这种情况下,意大利最高法院介入辩论,允许承认与同性伴侣代孕母亲程序有关的外国收养令。关注国际公共政策概念的最近演变,最高法院申明,同性夫妇获得的固有的收养父母地位并不违反国际公共政策,只要这种地位所产生的行为的影响不违反由意向父母和子女之间关系选择的基本原则所构成的不能超越的限制(《宪法》第2条、《欧洲人权公约》第8条)。意大利第219/2012号法律规定的儿童最大利益、不歧视原则、作为社会养育基础的团结原则。分裂代孕的问题,在这种情况下承认收养令的基础上,缩小公共政策例外,建议同性伴侣实现他们的父母项目的风险是非常明显的,在当代法律体系中,代孕是可能的,因为这一程序而出生的孩子是可能被收养的。
{"title":"Adoption v. Surrogacy: New Perspectives on the Parental Projects of Same-Sex Couples","authors":"S. Tonolo","doi":"10.1163/27725650-01010007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/27725650-01010007","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000In Italy all forms of surrogacy are forbidden, whether it be traditional or gestational, commercial or altruistic. Act n. 40 of 19/2/2004, entitled “Rules about medically-assisted reproduction”, introduces a prohibition on employing gametes from donors, and specifically incriminates not only intermediary agencies and clinics practising surrogacy, but also the intended parents and the surrogate mother too. Other penal consequences are provided by the Criminal Code about the registration of a birth certificate where parents are the intended ones, as provided by the lex loci actus (art. 567 of the Italian Criminal Code, concerning the false representation or concealment of status). Apart from the mentioned criminal problems, several aspects of private international law are involved. In the cases where national rules forbid the transcription of birth certificates for public policy reasons, specifically the prohibition of surrogacy, Italian Judges often seek solutions to enforce the status filiationis. In this case, the Italian Supreme Court intervenes in the debate, allowing the recognition of a foreign adoption order related to a procedure of surrogate motherhood in favour of a same-sex couple. Focusing on the recent evolution of the notion of international public policy the Supreme Court affirms that the inherent adoptive parental status acquired by a homogenitorial couple is not contrary to international public policy, when the effects of the act from which this status derives are not incompatible with the limits that cannot be exceeded constituted by the founding principles of the relational choices between intended parents and child (Article 2 of the Constitution, Article 8 ECHR), by the Best interest of the child as codified in the Italian Law 219/2012, by the principle of non-discrimination, by the principle of solidarity that is the basis of social parenting. Splitting the problem of the surrogacy, underlying the adoption order to recognize in this case, and narrowing the public policy exception, is highly evident the risk to suggest to same-sex couples to realize their parental projects putting in place the surrogacy within the legal systems where contemporary it is possible to carry out the adoption of the child born as a result of this procedure.","PeriodicalId":275877,"journal":{"name":"The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121143518","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
期刊
The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1