Pub Date : 2022-12-30DOI: 10.37477/isejou.v1i1.402
Marco Hadi Surya, Albertus Daru Dewantoro
The most important asset a company needs is the role of humans. Without the human role, the company will not run as it should. Human resource management will be easy if it has rules. Rules and objectives will be given each entry into the organization for the first time. Therefore, using a Job Profile will provide responsibilities that should be owned by every employee so that work goals are clear and focused. PT X already has a Job Profile but it's still not as expected. All data is still done manually with the help of Ms Word. The research method used is a case study exploratory research. Primary data was collected by interviewing the recruitment and HRD. The secondary data obtained is the existing Job Profile at PT X, namely in the form of soft files and hard files. The results of this study will make it easier for recruitment parties to create Job Profiles automatically using spreadsheets. There are limitations to be used as report material because the Job Profile is confidential data owned by the company. Topics that can be used as reports are Job Title, Job Description, Job Specification, and Job Competency.
{"title":"PERANCANGAN JOB PROFILE BERBASIS SPREADSHEETS","authors":"Marco Hadi Surya, Albertus Daru Dewantoro","doi":"10.37477/isejou.v1i1.402","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37477/isejou.v1i1.402","url":null,"abstract":"The most important asset a company needs is the role of humans. Without the human role, the company will not run as it should. Human resource management will be easy if it has rules. Rules and objectives will be given each entry into the organization for the first time. Therefore, using a Job Profile will provide responsibilities that should be owned by every employee so that work goals are clear and focused. PT X already has a Job Profile but it's still not as expected. All data is still done manually with the help of Ms Word. The research method used is a case study exploratory research. Primary data was collected by interviewing the recruitment and HRD. The secondary data obtained is the existing Job Profile at PT X, namely in the form of soft files and hard files. The results of this study will make it easier for recruitment parties to create Job Profiles automatically using spreadsheets. There are limitations to be used as report material because the Job Profile is confidential data owned by the company. Topics that can be used as reports are Job Title, Job Description, Job Specification, and Job Competency.","PeriodicalId":277825,"journal":{"name":"Industrial & System Engineering Journals (ISEJOU)","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121256102","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-30DOI: 10.37477/isejou.v1i1.398
Albertus Daru Dewantoro, Nehemia Dwi April Riyanto, Antonius Yan Sheva Christiano, Citra Rahayu Kumaladewi
The activity of implementing the performance evaluation of study programs in tertiary institutions aims to improve internal quality in a sustainable manner. The performance evaluation process requires a gradual process, namely the performance monitoring process. Evaluation and monitoring of study program performance are generally implemented in the implementation of education, research, and community service to improve study program performance. Therefore, the priority of the main performance indicators of study programs in the Faculty of Engineering is determined by referring to the Chancellor's Regulation No. 03/PR/2022, classifies the main performance indicators of the Faculty of Engineering study program based on the dimensions of the balanced scorecard, and designs a work program monitoring spreadsheet to support KPI achievement. The research also aims to identify KPIs in four stages: customer perspective, financial perspective, business process perspective, and learning and growth perspective. The University has prioritized the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 6th and 7th performance indicators. Regulation of the Dean of the Faculty of Engineering No. 143/UKDC.1/A.01/XI/2022 as a reference in setting KPIs, this document has succeeded in formulating 22 main performance indicators and 5 additional performance indicators. Prioritized performance indicators are then made into a spreadsheet-based performance form which is useful in implementing performance monitoring Keywords: Performance measurement, balanced scorecard, key performance indicators
{"title":"Perancangan Sistem Pendukung Monitoring Kinerja Program Studi Dengan Metode Balanced Scorecard Studi Kasus: Prodi Di Fakultas Teknik UKDC","authors":"Albertus Daru Dewantoro, Nehemia Dwi April Riyanto, Antonius Yan Sheva Christiano, Citra Rahayu Kumaladewi","doi":"10.37477/isejou.v1i1.398","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37477/isejou.v1i1.398","url":null,"abstract":"The activity of implementing the performance evaluation of study programs in tertiary institutions aims to improve internal quality in a sustainable manner. The performance evaluation process requires a gradual process, namely the performance monitoring process. Evaluation and monitoring of study program performance are generally implemented in the implementation of education, research, and community service to improve study program performance. Therefore, the priority of the main performance indicators of study programs in the Faculty of Engineering is determined by referring to the Chancellor's Regulation No. 03/PR/2022, classifies the main performance indicators of the Faculty of Engineering study program based on the dimensions of the balanced scorecard, and designs a work program monitoring spreadsheet to support KPI achievement. The research also aims to identify KPIs in four stages: customer perspective, financial perspective, business process perspective, and learning and growth perspective. The University has prioritized the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 6th and 7th performance indicators. Regulation of the Dean of the Faculty of Engineering No. 143/UKDC.1/A.01/XI/2022 as a reference in setting KPIs, this document has succeeded in formulating 22 main performance indicators and 5 additional performance indicators. Prioritized performance indicators are then made into a spreadsheet-based performance form which is useful in implementing performance monitoring \u0000 \u0000Keywords: Performance measurement, balanced scorecard, key performance indicators","PeriodicalId":277825,"journal":{"name":"Industrial & System Engineering Journals (ISEJOU)","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121126072","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：