首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Religious Education最新文献

英文 中文
“Covid made me think about…” What really matters in RE: a European research project "Covid 让我思考......"RE 中真正重要的是:欧洲研究项目
IF 0.6 0 RELIGION Pub Date : 2024-02-28 DOI: 10.1007/s40839-024-00225-4
Tania ap Siôn, Sandra Cullen, Sonja Danner, Bianca Kappelhoff, Eszter Kodácsy-Simon

Living and working through the challenges of a pandemic offered a unique research opportunity to engage with some core questions about what really matters in Religious Education (RE) in countries across Europe. The What Covid Reveals to Religious Education Specialists research project sought to provide a reflective space for RE specialists, drawn from the board members of the European Forum for Teachers of Religious Education (EFTRE), to consider their experiences of RE during the Covid-19 pandemic and to begin to articulate what they might want in the future for RE in light of their experiences. Areas explored in the online qualitative survey included: challenging questions and issues, social unrest, student–teacher relationships, learning scenarios, valued dimensions in RE, opportunities for the future, and ‘ideal’ RE. Respondents were from sixteen of the twenty-two countries present on the EFTRE Board, offering their individual perspectives from Western, Northern, Central and Southern Europe. Using the tool ATLAS.ti, an inductive analytical approach was employed; a number of key group ‘themes’ emerged from the responses, which provided a basis for further analysis. This paper will present some of the main findings in dialogue with the focusing research stimulus question: What does Covid-19 reveal to RE specialists about their subject? The project is a European collaboration involving researchers from Austria, Germany, Hungary, Ireland and Wales.

在大流行病的挑战下生活和工作,为我们提供了一个独特的研究机会,来探讨欧洲各国宗教教育(RE)中真正重要的一些核心问题。Covid 对宗教教育专家的启示 "研究项目旨在为宗教教育专家提供一个反思的空间,这些专家来自欧洲宗教教育教师论坛(EFTRE)的理事会成员,他们在 Covid-19 大流行期间思考自己在宗教教育方面的经验,并根据自己的经验开始阐述自己对未来宗教教育的期望。在线定性调查所探讨的领域包括:具有挑战性的问题和议题、社会动荡、师生关系、学习情景、宗教教育的价值维度、未来的机遇以及 "理想的 "宗教教育。受访者来自 EFTRE 董事会 22 个成员国中的 16 个,他们分别从西欧、北欧、中欧和南欧的角度提出了自己的看法。利用 ATLAS.ti 工具,我们采用了归纳分析方法;从答复中得出了一些关键的群体 "主题",为进一步分析提供了基础。本文将结合重点研究激励问题,介绍一些主要发现:Covid-19 向 RE 专家揭示了什么?该项目是一项欧洲合作项目,涉及奥地利、德国、匈牙利、爱尔兰和威尔士的研究人员。
{"title":"“Covid made me think about…” What really matters in RE: a European research project","authors":"Tania ap Siôn, Sandra Cullen, Sonja Danner, Bianca Kappelhoff, Eszter Kodácsy-Simon","doi":"10.1007/s40839-024-00225-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40839-024-00225-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Living and working through the challenges of a pandemic offered a unique research opportunity to engage with some core questions about what really matters in Religious Education (RE) in countries across Europe. The <i>What Covid Reveals to Religious Education Specialists</i> research project sought to provide a reflective space for RE specialists, drawn from the board members of the European Forum for Teachers of Religious Education (EFTRE), to consider their experiences of RE during the Covid-19 pandemic and to begin to articulate what they might want in the future for RE in light of their experiences. Areas explored in the online qualitative survey included: challenging questions and issues, social unrest, student–teacher relationships, learning scenarios, valued dimensions in RE, opportunities for the future, and ‘ideal’ RE. Respondents were from sixteen of the twenty-two countries present on the EFTRE Board, offering their individual perspectives from Western, Northern, Central and Southern Europe. Using the tool ATLAS.ti, an inductive analytical approach was employed; a number of key group ‘themes’ emerged from the responses, which provided a basis for further analysis. This paper will present some of the main findings in dialogue with the focusing research stimulus question: <i>What does Covid-19 reveal to RE specialists about their subject?</i> The project is a European collaboration involving researchers from Austria, Germany, Hungary, Ireland and Wales.</p>","PeriodicalId":30871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Religious Education","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140008977","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The ‘Gospel’ according to Vygotsky? Reflections on the role of symbolic mediation in religious education 维果斯基的 "福音"?对宗教教育中符号中介作用的思考
IF 0.6 0 RELIGION Pub Date : 2024-02-05 DOI: 10.1007/s40839-023-00220-1

Abstract

As perspectives from the Russian psychologist Lev Vygotsky have made a substantial impact in the field of educational sciences, they have generated interest even in the field of religious education. To address some possible implications of Vygotskyan perspectives for religious education, this study focuses on Vygotsky’s notion of symbolic mediation, compared with perspectives from theological publications, interviews with religiously affiliated students as well as curricula and textbooks. Based on a comparison and discussion of these sources, the study argues that Vygotsky’s psychological perspective on symbolic mediation as key to human self-determination is not in conflict with theological and empirical approaches to religious symbols but that the latter display a wider variety of perspectives. It is argued that while religious education may benefit from Vygotskyan perspectives, a reflection is also needed on how to deal with the framing of religious symbols by varying theological positions and conflicting worldviews in different religious education settings.

摘要 俄罗斯心理学家列夫-维果茨基的观点在教育科学领域产生了重大影响,甚至在宗教教育领域也引起了人们的兴趣。为了探讨维果茨基观点对宗教教育可能产生的一些影响,本研究将维果茨基的符号中介概念与神学出版物、宗教学生访谈以及课程和教科书中的观点进行比较。在对这些资料进行比较和讨论的基础上,本研究认为,维果茨基关于符号中介是人类自决关键的心理学观点与神学和实证研究宗教符号的方法并不冲突,但后者显示出更广泛的视角。论文认为,虽然宗教教育可以从维果茨基的观点中获益,但也需要反思在不同的宗教教育环境中,如何通过不同的神学立场和相互冲突的世界观来处理宗教符号的框架问题。
{"title":"The ‘Gospel’ according to Vygotsky? Reflections on the role of symbolic mediation in religious education","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s40839-023-00220-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40839-023-00220-1","url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>As perspectives from the Russian psychologist Lev Vygotsky have made a substantial impact in the field of educational sciences, they have generated interest even in the field of religious education. To address some possible implications of Vygotskyan perspectives for religious education, this study focuses on Vygotsky’s notion of symbolic mediation, compared with perspectives from theological publications, interviews with religiously affiliated students as well as curricula and textbooks. Based on a comparison and discussion of these sources, the study argues that Vygotsky’s psychological perspective on symbolic mediation as key to human self-determination is not in conflict with theological and empirical approaches to religious symbols but that the latter display a wider variety of perspectives. It is argued that while religious education may benefit from Vygotskyan perspectives, a reflection is also needed on how to deal with the framing of religious symbols by varying theological positions and conflicting worldviews in different religious education settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":30871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Religious Education","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139771421","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Death knell or revival? Navigating religious education in the age of the non-religious 丧钟还是复兴?非宗教时代的宗教教育导航
IF 0.6 0 RELIGION Pub Date : 2023-11-19 DOI: 10.1007/s40839-023-00215-y
Ruth J. Wareham

England and Wales are now amongst the least religious countries in the world. According to Census data between 2011 and 2021, the number of people identifying as having ‘No Religion’ jumped by over 8 million, from 25% to 37%. Further, although there was a small upward shift in those identifying with minority religions, during the same period, the number of people identifying as Christian dropped by 5.5 million to 46.2% of the population. Wales is particularly irreligious. Here, 47% ticked ‘No Religion’ compared to 44% ‘Christian’. But even in Northern Ireland, where the majority still identify with a Christian denomination, the non-religious population has nearly doubled (from 10 to 17%) in the last decade. This surge in the non-religious will (and ought to) affect policy in a wide range of areas, but it is likely to be most profoundly felt in education; be that via reforms designed to better accommodate non-religious learners or attempts to reverse what is seen as a threatening trend by some religious groups and organisations. In this paper I explore the implications of this rapid demographic shift on religious education (RE). I argue that, while some may view the growth of the non-religious as a ‘death knell’ signalling the subject’s impending demise, it actually presents an unparalleled opportunity for revitalisation.

英格兰和威尔士现在是世界上宗教信仰最少的国家之一。根据2011年至2021年的人口普查数据,自认为“无宗教信仰”的人数增加了800多万,从25%增加到37%。此外,尽管认同少数宗教的人数有小幅上升,但在同一时期,认为自己是基督徒的人数下降了550万,占总人口的46.2%。威尔士尤其不信教。在这里,47%的人选择“无宗教信仰”,44%的人选择“基督教徒”。但即使是在大多数人仍然信仰基督教的北爱尔兰,非宗教人口在过去十年中也几乎翻了一番(从10%增加到17%)。非宗教人数的激增将(也应该)影响广泛领域的政策,但可能在教育领域受到的影响最为深刻;无论是通过旨在更好地容纳非宗教学习者的改革,还是试图扭转被一些宗教团体和组织视为威胁的趋势。在本文中,我探讨了这种快速人口变化对宗教教育(RE)的影响。我认为,虽然有些人可能认为非宗教的增长是一个“丧钟”,标志着这个主题即将消亡,但它实际上提供了一个无与伦比的振兴机会。
{"title":"Death knell or revival? Navigating religious education in the age of the non-religious","authors":"Ruth J. Wareham","doi":"10.1007/s40839-023-00215-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40839-023-00215-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p>England and Wales are now amongst the least religious countries in the world. According to Census data between 2011 and 2021, the number of people identifying as having ‘No Religion’ jumped by over 8 million, from 25% to 37%. Further, although there was a small upward shift in those identifying with minority religions, during the same period, the number of people identifying as Christian dropped by 5.5 million to 46.2% of the population. Wales is particularly irreligious. Here, 47% ticked ‘No Religion’ compared to 44% ‘Christian’. But even in Northern Ireland, where the majority still identify with a Christian denomination, the non-religious population has nearly doubled (from 10 to 17%) in the last decade. This surge in the non-religious will (and ought to) affect policy in a wide range of areas, but it is likely to be most profoundly felt in education; be that via reforms designed to better accommodate non-religious learners or attempts to reverse what is seen as a threatening trend by some religious groups and organisations. In this paper I explore the implications of this rapid demographic shift on religious education (RE). I argue that, while some may view the growth of the non-religious as a ‘death knell’ signalling the subject’s impending demise, it actually presents an unparalleled opportunity for revitalisation.</p>","PeriodicalId":30871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Religious Education","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2023-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138534711","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Implementing Personal Construct Theory to explore divergent approaches to substantive knowledge in RE 运用个人构念理论探索RE中实体知识的不同途径
0 RELIGION Pub Date : 2023-11-14 DOI: 10.1007/s40839-023-00206-z
Ruth Flanagan
Abstract Divergence is not a new phenomenon in RE in England and Wales. A diverse range of aims and approaches have been promoted since RE provision became compulsory in 1944. Approaches include the phenomenological, interpretative, and dialogic with current debates centring around the benefits and challenges of a ‘worldviews approach’. There have been a range of responses to this approach, and implementation has been diverse. It may appear that at the heart of this divergence is confusion over the definition of the term 'worldview' and what this entails for teachers: adding content knowledge and diverse sources. However, this paper argues that the divergence is much more significantly rooted in the nature of ‘substantive knowledge’ and the power dynamics associated with who defines, selects and assesses the validity of substantive knowledge. In current research, I am testing the hypothesis that teachers’ personal worldviews influence their choice of substantive knowledge in RE. Through 142 questionnaires and 21 interviews, this power dynamic is being investigated. Employing Kelly’s (Kelly, Personal construct psychology, Norton, 1955) Personal Construct Theory illuminated teachers’ personal worldviews relating to substantive knowledge in RE. Through the completion and analysis of RepGrids, the teachers revealed they taught the ‘good’ aspects of religions and ignored the ‘bad’. They prized knowledge from lived experience above knowledge provided by religious institutions and some deemed online sources more useful than those from religious institutions. The power to define ‘substantive’ knowledge, once primarily in the hands of religious institutions, has dissipated to embrace definitions from teachers’ personal worldviews. Whilst enabling a diversity of beliefs to be covered, without examination, hegemonic power may risk the validity of the subject. What is needed, in the midst of this divergence, is not a battle for supremacy, and a rejection of one voice over the other, but an acknowledgement of the power dynamics in defining substantive knowledge in RE.
在英格兰和威尔士的RE中,分化并不是一个新现象。自1944年强制提供可再生能源以来,促进了一系列不同的目标和方法。方法包括现象学、解释学和对话,目前围绕“世界观方法”的好处和挑战展开辩论。对这一方法有各种各样的反应,实施方式也各不相同。这种分歧的核心似乎是对“世界观”一词的定义的困惑,以及这对教师的要求:增加内容知识和多样化的资源。然而,本文认为,这种分歧更重要的根源在于“实质性知识”的本质,以及与谁定义、选择和评估实质性知识的有效性相关的权力动力学。在目前的研究中,我正在测试教师的个人世界观影响他们在RE中实质性知识选择的假设。通过142份问卷和21次访谈,我们正在调查这种权力动态。运用凯利的(凯利,个人构念心理学,诺顿,1955)个人构念理论阐明了教师在RE中与实质性知识相关的个人世界观。通过对RepGrids的完成和分析,教师们揭示了他们教授宗教的“好的”方面而忽略了“坏的”方面。他们更看重来自生活经验的知识,而不是宗教机构提供的知识,有些人认为在线资源比宗教机构提供的更有用。定义“实质性”知识的权力,曾经主要掌握在宗教机构手中,现在已经消散,接受了教师个人世界观的定义。在使信仰的多样性得以覆盖而不受审查的同时,霸权可能会危及主体的有效性。在这种分歧中,我们需要的不是一场争夺霸权的斗争,也不是对另一种声音的拒绝,而是承认在定义可再生能源的实质性知识时的权力动态。
{"title":"Implementing Personal Construct Theory to explore divergent approaches to substantive knowledge in RE","authors":"Ruth Flanagan","doi":"10.1007/s40839-023-00206-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40839-023-00206-z","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Divergence is not a new phenomenon in RE in England and Wales. A diverse range of aims and approaches have been promoted since RE provision became compulsory in 1944. Approaches include the phenomenological, interpretative, and dialogic with current debates centring around the benefits and challenges of a ‘worldviews approach’. There have been a range of responses to this approach, and implementation has been diverse. It may appear that at the heart of this divergence is confusion over the definition of the term 'worldview' and what this entails for teachers: adding content knowledge and diverse sources. However, this paper argues that the divergence is much more significantly rooted in the nature of ‘substantive knowledge’ and the power dynamics associated with who defines, selects and assesses the validity of substantive knowledge. In current research, I am testing the hypothesis that teachers’ personal worldviews influence their choice of substantive knowledge in RE. Through 142 questionnaires and 21 interviews, this power dynamic is being investigated. Employing Kelly’s (Kelly, Personal construct psychology, Norton, 1955) Personal Construct Theory illuminated teachers’ personal worldviews relating to substantive knowledge in RE. Through the completion and analysis of RepGrids, the teachers revealed they taught the ‘good’ aspects of religions and ignored the ‘bad’. They prized knowledge from lived experience above knowledge provided by religious institutions and some deemed online sources more useful than those from religious institutions. The power to define ‘substantive’ knowledge, once primarily in the hands of religious institutions, has dissipated to embrace definitions from teachers’ personal worldviews. Whilst enabling a diversity of beliefs to be covered, without examination, hegemonic power may risk the validity of the subject. What is needed, in the midst of this divergence, is not a battle for supremacy, and a rejection of one voice over the other, but an acknowledgement of the power dynamics in defining substantive knowledge in RE.","PeriodicalId":30871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Religious Education","volume":"74 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134901432","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The future shape of RE in England’s Catholic schools: an initial appraisal of the Religious Education Directory for England and Wales (2023) 英格兰天主教学校RE的未来形态:对英格兰和威尔士宗教教育目录的初步评估(2023)
0 RELIGION Pub Date : 2023-11-14 DOI: 10.1007/s40839-023-00216-x
Sean Whittle
{"title":"The future shape of RE in England’s Catholic schools: an initial appraisal of the Religious Education Directory for England and Wales (2023)","authors":"Sean Whittle","doi":"10.1007/s40839-023-00216-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40839-023-00216-x","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":30871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Religious Education","volume":"72 16","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134901149","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Who studies religion? Towards a better conversation between Theology, Religious Studies, and Religious Education 谁研究宗教?迈向神学、宗教研究和宗教教育之间更好的对话
0 RELIGION Pub Date : 2023-11-10 DOI: 10.1007/s40839-023-00213-0
Céline Benoit, Tim Hutchings
Abstract This paper calls for better integration between the fields of Theology and Religious Studies (TRS) and Religious Education (RE). Positive reform in RE requires integration between educational theory, policy, and practice, but we argue that the academic study of theology and religion is too often an overlooked partner in these conversations. The separation of TRS from RE is damaging at all levels of the curriculum, undermining the rigour and critical depth of school syllabi, cutting TRS and RE specialists off from valuable intellectual discussion, and leaving university departments unprepared to properly support student progression. This destructive divergence has long been observed (e.g. Cush in Br J Relig Educ 21:137–146, 1999), but this paper proposes that the emerging paradigm of Religion and Worldviews Education (RWE) has encouraged important progress. The advent of RWE has generated new interest among RE specialists in the theory and practice of multidisciplinary TRS. It has also created space for TRS academics from many fields to engage with teachers and policymakers in productive conversations. To illustrate this argument, we highlight some examples of good practice and suggest future work through which links might be strengthened.
摘要:本文呼吁神学与宗教研究(TRS)与宗教教育(RE)领域更好地整合。RE的积极改革需要教育理论、政策和实践之间的整合,但我们认为神学和宗教的学术研究在这些对话中往往是被忽视的伙伴。TRS与RE的分离对课程的各个层面都是有害的,破坏了学校教学大纲的严谨性和批判性深度,切断了TRS和RE专家参与有价值的智力讨论的机会,并使大学院系没有准备好适当地支持学生的进步。这种破坏性的分歧早已被观察到(例如,库什在Br J religious Educ 21:137-146, 1999),但本文提出,宗教与世界观教育(RWE)的新兴范式鼓励了重要的进展。RWE的出现引起了再生专家对多学科TRS理论和实践的新兴趣。它还为来自许多领域的TRS学者与教师和政策制定者进行富有成效的对话创造了空间。为了说明这一论点,我们强调了一些良好做法的例子,并建议今后的工作,通过这些工作可以加强联系。
{"title":"Who studies religion? Towards a better conversation between Theology, Religious Studies, and Religious Education","authors":"Céline Benoit, Tim Hutchings","doi":"10.1007/s40839-023-00213-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40839-023-00213-0","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper calls for better integration between the fields of Theology and Religious Studies (TRS) and Religious Education (RE). Positive reform in RE requires integration between educational theory, policy, and practice, but we argue that the academic study of theology and religion is too often an overlooked partner in these conversations. The separation of TRS from RE is damaging at all levels of the curriculum, undermining the rigour and critical depth of school syllabi, cutting TRS and RE specialists off from valuable intellectual discussion, and leaving university departments unprepared to properly support student progression. This destructive divergence has long been observed (e.g. Cush in Br J Relig Educ 21:137–146, 1999), but this paper proposes that the emerging paradigm of Religion and Worldviews Education (RWE) has encouraged important progress. The advent of RWE has generated new interest among RE specialists in the theory and practice of multidisciplinary TRS. It has also created space for TRS academics from many fields to engage with teachers and policymakers in productive conversations. To illustrate this argument, we highlight some examples of good practice and suggest future work through which links might be strengthened.","PeriodicalId":30871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Religious Education","volume":"118 30","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135136860","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Muslim converts as a heuristic device for postsecular thinking: agonism as an alternative approach 穆斯林皈依者是后世俗思维的启发式工具:斗争论是另一种方法
0 RELIGION Pub Date : 2023-11-08 DOI: 10.1007/s40839-023-00214-z
Jeremiah O. A. Olusola
Abstract The public resurgence of religious adherence in the West remains one of the defining qualities of this century. If secularisation theory can be understood to articulate the inevitable secularisation of post-enlightenment European societies, religious converts may be understood to epitomise some of the theory’s failings. Through a narrative-ethnographic investigation into the identity configurations and educational experiences of fifteen millennial (born between 1981 and 1996) Muslim converts, my doctoral research indicates that these converts tend to construct deeply religious identities, characterised by scriptural literalism. Set within the backdrop of an educational context that some perceive as increasingly censorious, these convert Muslims provide a heuristic device with which to examine the contested public spaces in which religious subjectivity can be expressed. This paper will bring literature challenging the securitisation agenda in education, into conversation with theories resistant to the impulse to seek consensus in social and educational debate. Advocating for more agonistic approaches to education, I will present examples from my data that warn of the ways in which ‘hardened’ secular and liberal biases may contribute towards an unmooring of the pluralistic endeavour. Located within contemporary debates about the importance of religion as a discursive aspect of modernity, the chilling of free speech and the place of transgressive thought, the paper encourages an expansion of opportunities to disagree.
宗教信仰在西方的公开复兴仍然是本世纪的决定性特征之一。如果世俗化理论可以被理解为阐明后启蒙时代欧洲社会不可避免的世俗化,那么宗教皈依者可能被理解为该理论某些失败的缩影。通过对15名千禧一代(出生于1981年至1996年之间)穆斯林皈依者的身份结构和教育经历的叙事民族志调查,我的博士研究表明,这些皈依者倾向于构建深刻的宗教身份,其特征是圣经的字面主义。在一些人认为审查越来越严格的教育背景下,这些皈依的穆斯林提供了一种启发式的手段,用来检查有争议的公共空间,在这些公共空间中,宗教主体性可以得到表达。本文将把挑战教育证券化议程的文献与抵制在社会和教育辩论中寻求共识的冲动的理论进行对话。我将从我的数据中提出一些例子,以倡导更激烈的教育方法,这些例子警告说,“顽固的”世俗和自由主义偏见可能会导致多元化努力的松动。在当代关于宗教作为现代性话语方面的重要性的辩论中,自由言论的冷却和越界思想的地方,本文鼓励扩大不同意的机会。
{"title":"Muslim converts as a heuristic device for postsecular thinking: agonism as an alternative approach","authors":"Jeremiah O. A. Olusola","doi":"10.1007/s40839-023-00214-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40839-023-00214-z","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The public resurgence of religious adherence in the West remains one of the defining qualities of this century. If secularisation theory can be understood to articulate the inevitable secularisation of post-enlightenment European societies, religious converts may be understood to epitomise some of the theory’s failings. Through a narrative-ethnographic investigation into the identity configurations and educational experiences of fifteen millennial (born between 1981 and 1996) Muslim converts, my doctoral research indicates that these converts tend to construct deeply religious identities, characterised by scriptural literalism. Set within the backdrop of an educational context that some perceive as increasingly censorious, these convert Muslims provide a heuristic device with which to examine the contested public spaces in which religious subjectivity can be expressed. This paper will bring literature challenging the securitisation agenda in education, into conversation with theories resistant to the impulse to seek consensus in social and educational debate. Advocating for more agonistic approaches to education, I will present examples from my data that warn of the ways in which ‘hardened’ secular and liberal biases may contribute towards an unmooring of the pluralistic endeavour. Located within contemporary debates about the importance of religion as a discursive aspect of modernity, the chilling of free speech and the place of transgressive thought, the paper encourages an expansion of opportunities to disagree.","PeriodicalId":30871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Religious Education","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135341638","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Religion and worldviews education and the paradox of inclusivity 宗教和世界观,教育和包容性的悖论
0 RELIGION Pub Date : 2023-11-02 DOI: 10.1007/s40839-023-00212-1
Daniel Moulin
Abstract Paradoxes of inclusivity occur when attempts at inclusivity clash with the exclusive claims of some of the positions they seek to accommodate. In this article I identify and consider how such a paradox manifests in multi-faith religious education pedagogies—what I call the ‘paradox of interreligious inclusivity’ or ‘PIRI’, for short. After presenting some relevant and illuminating examples, I consider PIRI in regard to proposals in England for ‘religion and worldviews education’. By defining the conceptual problem at the root of challenges posed by such an innovation and pedagogical models more generally, I suggest greater recognition of the deep implications of PIRI are essential in any context when educators seek to include those of all religions and those of none in programmes of religious education.
当包容性的尝试与他们寻求容纳的某些立场的排他性主张发生冲突时,包容性的悖论就会发生。在这篇文章中,我确定并考虑了这种悖论是如何在多信仰的宗教教育教学中表现出来的——我称之为“宗教间包容性悖论”,简称“PIRI”。在介绍了一些相关的和有启发性的例子之后,我考虑了PIRI在英国关于“宗教和世界观教育”的建议。通过定义这种创新和更普遍的教学模式所带来的挑战的根源的概念问题,我建议在教育者试图将所有宗教和非宗教纳入宗教教育计划的任何背景下,对PIRI的深刻含义有更大的认识是必不可少的。
{"title":"Religion and worldviews education and the paradox of inclusivity","authors":"Daniel Moulin","doi":"10.1007/s40839-023-00212-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40839-023-00212-1","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Paradoxes of inclusivity occur when attempts at inclusivity clash with the exclusive claims of some of the positions they seek to accommodate. In this article I identify and consider how such a paradox manifests in multi-faith religious education pedagogies—what I call the ‘paradox of interreligious inclusivity’ or ‘PIRI’, for short. After presenting some relevant and illuminating examples, I consider PIRI in regard to proposals in England for ‘religion and worldviews education’. By defining the conceptual problem at the root of challenges posed by such an innovation and pedagogical models more generally, I suggest greater recognition of the deep implications of PIRI are essential in any context when educators seek to include those of all religions and those of none in programmes of religious education.","PeriodicalId":30871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Religious Education","volume":"29 20","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135972851","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
AULRE 2023: Theory, policy and practice in RE—is this a time of divergence? 《华尔街日报》2023:re的理论、政策和实践:这是一个分歧的时代吗?
0 RELIGION Pub Date : 2023-11-02 DOI: 10.1007/s40839-023-00217-w
Stephen J. McKinney, Sean Whittle
{"title":"AULRE 2023: Theory, policy and practice in RE—is this a time of divergence?","authors":"Stephen J. McKinney, Sean Whittle","doi":"10.1007/s40839-023-00217-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40839-023-00217-w","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":30871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Religious Education","volume":"13 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135933754","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction to: The experiences of non-religious children in religious education 更正:非宗教儿童在宗教教育中的经历
0 RELIGION Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI: 10.1007/s40839-023-00208-x
Anna Strhan, Rachael Shillitoe
{"title":"Correction to: The experiences of non-religious children in religious education","authors":"Anna Strhan, Rachael Shillitoe","doi":"10.1007/s40839-023-00208-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40839-023-00208-x","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":30871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Religious Education","volume":"55 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135870867","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Religious Education
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1