Pub Date : 2019-02-27DOI: 10.7591/9781501725999-007
{"title":"5. Significant Campaigns: Getting on the Global Agenda","authors":"","doi":"10.7591/9781501725999-007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501725999-007","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":312518,"journal":{"name":"National Secession","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122225932","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-10-15DOI: 10.7591/cornell/9781501725982.003.0007
Philip G. Roeder
This chapter examines how, in the strategy of programmatic coordination, the tactic of increasing intensity, such as a protracted violent struggle, requires high levels of programmatic coordination but is in turn chosen to sustain this and achieve still greater coordination within the platform population. Using an original dataset on violent insurgency, terrorism, and protest by the 171 national-secession campaigns that got on the global agenda, the results of statistical analysis are consistent with the expectation that campaigns on behalf of more authentic and realistic programs are more likely to engage in protracted intense struggles.
{"title":"Protracted Intense Struggles","authors":"Philip G. Roeder","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501725982.003.0007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501725982.003.0007","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines how, in the strategy of programmatic coordination, the tactic of increasing intensity, such as a protracted violent struggle, requires high levels of programmatic coordination but is in turn chosen to sustain this and achieve still greater coordination within the platform population. Using an original dataset on violent insurgency, terrorism, and protest by the 171 national-secession campaigns that got on the global agenda, the results of statistical analysis are consistent with the expectation that campaigns on behalf of more authentic and realistic programs are more likely to engage in protracted intense struggles.","PeriodicalId":312518,"journal":{"name":"National Secession","volume":"170 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123269427","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-10-15DOI: 10.7591/CORNELL/9781501725982.003.0006
Philip G. Roeder
This chapter examines how increasing programmatic coordination gives rise to intractability in the national secessionists’ dispute with their central government because national-secessionist campaign leaders become constrained by the very campaign solidarity that they cultivated. Looking closely at the frozen conflicts of the post-Soviet space, case studies illustrate how the efforts of national-secession campaign leaders to solidify statehood and nationhood within their break-away regions contribute to intractability in exchanges with their central governments. A consequence is transformation of negotiations into “championships” with the rise of “pseudo-bargaining” in which the primary target of offers at the negotiating table is not the central government, but the audience of platform population and international community.
{"title":"Intractable Disputes","authors":"Philip G. Roeder","doi":"10.7591/CORNELL/9781501725982.003.0006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7591/CORNELL/9781501725982.003.0006","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines how increasing programmatic coordination gives rise to intractability in the national secessionists’ dispute with their central government because national-secessionist campaign leaders become constrained by the very campaign solidarity that they cultivated. Looking closely at the frozen conflicts of the post-Soviet space, case studies illustrate how the efforts of national-secession campaign leaders to solidify statehood and nationhood within their break-away regions contribute to intractability in exchanges with their central governments. A consequence is transformation of negotiations into “championships” with the rise of “pseudo-bargaining” in which the primary target of offers at the negotiating table is not the central government, but the audience of platform population and international community.","PeriodicalId":312518,"journal":{"name":"National Secession","volume":"223 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116535156","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-10-15DOI: 10.7591/cornell/9781501725982.003.0009
Philip G. Roeder
The conclusion engages elements of the programmatic analysis that call for further investigation in future research, its predictions of potential national-secession hot spots in the next decades, and the policy implications for central governments confronting national secessionism to engage the struggle for minds created by campaigns engaged in programmatic coordination.
{"title":"Looking Forward","authors":"Philip G. Roeder","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501725982.003.0009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501725982.003.0009","url":null,"abstract":"The conclusion engages elements of the programmatic analysis that call for further investigation in future research, its predictions of potential national-secession hot spots in the next decades, and the policy implications for central governments confronting national secessionism to engage the struggle for minds created by campaigns engaged in programmatic coordination.","PeriodicalId":312518,"journal":{"name":"National Secession","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128750457","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：