首页 > 最新文献

Yuridika最新文献

英文 中文
Binding Power of Dispute Board Judgment in Construction Dispute Settlement 争议委员会判决在工程争议解决中的约束力
Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.20473/ydk.v38i1.42717
Lintang Yudhantaka, Y. S. Simamora, Ghansham Anand
Construction work in its implementation is carried out based on a contract. If there are problems in carrying out construction work, a dispute between the parties, in this case the service user and the service provider, will occur. Indonesia Law No. 2/2017 about Construction Services (hereafter called UU 2/2017) provides a new dispute resolution model option if problems occur in the construction sector, namely through the Dispute Board. The Dispute Board was created by the International Federation of Consulting Engineers / Federation Internationale des Ingenieurs-Conseils or FIDIC which was adopted into UU 2/2017. However, the regulation regarding the Dispute Board in UU 2/2017 needs to be studied further, especially regarding the nature of the final binding decision, because it still raises problems in its implementation. The purpose of this study is to examine the development of dispute resolution in the field of construction and the implementation of the final and binding nature of dispute board decisions. This study employed legal research methods with a conceptual and statute approach. The results of this study found that construction disputes can be resolved through litigation or non-litigation. The presence of the Dispute Board still does not provide legal certainty for the parties because the nature of the decision is final and binding but is not supported by an implementation mechanism.
建筑工程的实施是根据合同进行的。如果在施工过程中出现问题,就会发生双方之间的纠纷,在这种情况下是服务用户和服务提供者之间的纠纷。印度尼西亚关于建筑服务的第2/2017号法律(以下称为UU 2/2017)提供了一个新的争议解决模式选择,如果建筑部门发生问题,即通过争议委员会。争议委员会由国际咨询工程师联合会/国际工程师联合会(FIDIC)创建,并在UU 2/2017中被采纳。然而,UU 2/2017中关于争议委员会的规定需要进一步研究,特别是关于最终具有约束力的决定的性质,因为它在实施中仍然存在问题。本研究的目的是研究建筑领域争议解决的发展,以及争议委员会裁决的最终和约束性的执行情况。本研究采用概念法和成文法相结合的法律研究方法。本研究结果发现,建筑纠纷可以通过诉讼或非诉讼的方式解决。争端委员会的存在仍然不能为当事方提供法律确定性,因为裁决的性质是最终的和有约束力的,但没有执行机制的支持。
{"title":"Binding Power of Dispute Board Judgment in Construction Dispute Settlement","authors":"Lintang Yudhantaka, Y. S. Simamora, Ghansham Anand","doi":"10.20473/ydk.v38i1.42717","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v38i1.42717","url":null,"abstract":"Construction work in its implementation is carried out based on a contract. If there are problems in carrying out construction work, a dispute between the parties, in this case the service user and the service provider, will occur. Indonesia Law No. 2/2017 about Construction Services (hereafter called UU 2/2017) provides a new dispute resolution model option if problems occur in the construction sector, namely through the Dispute Board. The Dispute Board was created by the International Federation of Consulting Engineers / Federation Internationale des Ingenieurs-Conseils or FIDIC which was adopted into UU 2/2017. However, the regulation regarding the Dispute Board in UU 2/2017 needs to be studied further, especially regarding the nature of the final binding decision, because it still raises problems in its implementation. The purpose of this study is to examine the development of dispute resolution in the field of construction and the implementation of the final and binding nature of dispute board decisions. This study employed legal research methods with a conceptual and statute approach. The results of this study found that construction disputes can be resolved through litigation or non-litigation. The presence of the Dispute Board still does not provide legal certainty for the parties because the nature of the decision is final and binding but is not supported by an implementation mechanism.","PeriodicalId":31372,"journal":{"name":"Yuridika","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49035563","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
The Dialectic of Notary Inheritance Deed Arrangement 公证人继承契约安排的辩证法
Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.20473/ydk.v38i1.37787
Dinda Keumala
Verifying an heir's deed of inheritance is an approach to proving an heir’s legal status. The Indonesian Ministry of Land and Special Planning Regulation No.16/2021 stipulates that a notary can make an inheritance deed for all residents in Indonesia regardless of their ethnic groups. This paper investigates the notary inheritance deed arrangement based on the regulation mentioned above and the challenges notaries still encounter in making an inheritance deed after the regulation’s enactment. The researcher applied normative research with a descriptive approach and utilized secondary data for qualitative analysis. The deductive approach to this research helped the researcher conclude that the authority of notaries to make an inheritance deed as regulated in the Indonesian Ministry of Land and Special Planning Regulation No.16/2021 contradicts their authority as regulated in the Indonesian Law on the Notary Position Act. An in-depth understanding of the customary inheritance law in all Indonesian regions challenges the authority of notaries to make an inheritance deed under the Indonesian Ministry of Land and Special Planning Regulation No. 16/2021.
核实继承人的继承契约是证明继承人法律地位的一种方法。印度尼西亚土地和特别规划部第16/2021号条例规定,公证人可以为印度尼西亚的所有居民(不分种族)订立继承契约。本文探讨了基于上述规定的公证人继承契约安排,以及该规定颁布后公证人在制定继承契约时仍面临的挑战。研究人员采用描述性方法进行规范性研究,并利用二次数据进行定性分析。这项研究的演绎方法帮助研究人员得出结论,印尼土地和特别规划部第16/2021号条例规定的公证人订立继承契约的权力与印尼《公证人职位法》规定的公证员的权力相矛盾。深入了解印尼所有地区的习惯继承法,对公证人根据印尼土地和特别规划部第16/2021号条例制定继承契约的权力提出了挑战。
{"title":"The Dialectic of Notary Inheritance Deed Arrangement","authors":"Dinda Keumala","doi":"10.20473/ydk.v38i1.37787","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v38i1.37787","url":null,"abstract":"Verifying an heir's deed of inheritance is an approach to proving an heir’s legal status. The Indonesian Ministry of Land and Special Planning Regulation No.16/2021 stipulates that a notary can make an inheritance deed for all residents in Indonesia regardless of their ethnic groups. This paper investigates the notary inheritance deed arrangement based on the regulation mentioned above and the challenges notaries still encounter in making an inheritance deed after the regulation’s enactment. The researcher applied normative research with a descriptive approach and utilized secondary data for qualitative analysis. The deductive approach to this research helped the researcher conclude that the authority of notaries to make an inheritance deed as regulated in the Indonesian Ministry of Land and Special Planning Regulation No.16/2021 contradicts their authority as regulated in the Indonesian Law on the Notary Position Act. An in-depth understanding of the customary inheritance law in all Indonesian regions challenges the authority of notaries to make an inheritance deed under the Indonesian Ministry of Land and Special Planning Regulation No. 16/2021.","PeriodicalId":31372,"journal":{"name":"Yuridika","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44336404","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
One-Man Company Policy and Its Impact on Improving Citizen Welfare 一人公司政策及其对提高公民福利的影响
Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.20473/ydk.v38i1.37454
Bita Gadsia Spaltani, Muhammad Farid Alwajdi, Uni Tsulasi Putri
To facilitate investment for business actors, Law no. 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation makes changes, deletions, and stipulations to new regulations in several laws. One of the new regulations is to simplify the establishment of limited liability companies (LLCs) through changes to the provisions on company capital, legal entity status, and the company criteria for allowing one person to establish a micro or small business referred to in this research as a one-man company. In its development to date, BPS data from a survey of the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on approximately 30,000 MSME business actors in 2020 shows that as many as 84 percent of MSMEs experienced a decrease in income during the pandemic, with as many as 24 percent reducing capacity. This research was conducted using a normative juridical approach that examines legal principles as well as related laws and regulations. the legal basis for individual companies is regulated in laws and regulations which include Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation (UU Cipta Kerja), Government Regulation Number 7 of 2021 concerning Ease, Protection, and Empowerment of Cooperatives and Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises, Government Regulation Number 8 of 2021 concerning Authorized Capital of the Company and Registration of Establishment, Amendment.
为了促进商业行为者的投资,关于创造就业的2020年第11号法律对一些法律的新规定进行了修改、删除和规定。其中一项新规定是通过修改关于公司资本、法人地位和允许一个人建立本研究中称为一人公司的微型或小型企业的公司标准的规定,简化有限责任公司的设立。在迄今为止的发展中,2020年新冠肺炎疫情对约30000名中小微企业商业行为体影响的调查中的BPS数据显示,多达84%的中小微企业在疫情期间收入下降,多达24%的中小微公司产能下降。这项研究采用了规范的司法方法,审查了法律原则以及相关法律法规。个别公司的法律基础由法律法规规定,包括2020年关于创造就业的第11号法律(UU Cipta Kerja)、2021年关于合作社和微型、小型和中型企业的便利、保护和赋权的第7号政府法规,关于公司法定资本和设立登记的2021年第8号政府法规,修订。
{"title":"One-Man Company Policy and Its Impact on Improving Citizen Welfare","authors":"Bita Gadsia Spaltani, Muhammad Farid Alwajdi, Uni Tsulasi Putri","doi":"10.20473/ydk.v38i1.37454","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v38i1.37454","url":null,"abstract":"To facilitate investment for business actors, Law no. 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation makes changes, deletions, and stipulations to new regulations in several laws. One of the new regulations is to simplify the establishment of limited liability companies (LLCs) through changes to the provisions on company capital, legal entity status, and the company criteria for allowing one person to establish a micro or small business referred to in this research as a one-man company. In its development to date, BPS data from a survey of the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on approximately 30,000 MSME business actors in 2020 shows that as many as 84 percent of MSMEs experienced a decrease in income during the pandemic, with as many as 24 percent reducing capacity. This research was conducted using a normative juridical approach that examines legal principles as well as related laws and regulations. the legal basis for individual companies is regulated in laws and regulations which include Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation (UU Cipta Kerja), Government Regulation Number 7 of 2021 concerning Ease, Protection, and Empowerment of Cooperatives and Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises, Government Regulation Number 8 of 2021 concerning Authorized Capital of the Company and Registration of Establishment, Amendment.","PeriodicalId":31372,"journal":{"name":"Yuridika","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44775220","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Concept of Illegal Fishing for Indonesian Regulations and UNCLOS 印尼法规和联合国海洋法公约的非法捕鱼概念
Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.20473/ydk.v38i1.38045
Karina Tri Ambarsari, Ilham Rahmansyah, Andi Muhammad Fajar Abidin, Aurellya Desita Ananda Putri
Illegal fishing is a transnational crime that needs special attention in its eradication to safeguard national sovereignty. Illegal fishing law enforcement and the protection of marine assets in Indonesia are based on the Shipping Law, Fisheries Law, Ministerial Regulations, and UNCLOS. Must be protected by any actions related to opportunities for crime to occur. There is no legal protection for potential geographical indications as a communal right of the people in Indonesia. This paper adopted the normative method with data sources drawn from primary and secondary legal materials. In addition, control practices are important in the fight against illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing. From here, the sinking of the ship became one of the control programmes. The current perspective on the problem of sinking or destroying fishing vessels is not from a legal aspect but from a standard or guideline for implementing procedures that have not been regulated, even though the Indonesian government is the subject of comparison with applicable laws.
非法捕捞是一种跨国犯罪,为维护国家主权,必须予以特别重视。印度尼西亚的非法捕鱼执法和海洋资产保护以《航运法》、《渔业法》、《部级条例》和《联合国海洋法公约》为基础。必须受到任何与犯罪发生机会有关的行动的保护。作为印度尼西亚人民的一项公共权利,潜在的地理标志没有法律保护。本文采用规范性的方法,数据来源来源于一手和二手法律资料。此外,控制措施在打击非法、不报告和不管制(IUU)捕鱼方面也很重要。从这里开始,击沉这艘船就成了控制程序之一。目前对击沉或摧毁渔船问题的看法不是从法律方面,而是从执行尚未规范的程序的标准或准则出发,尽管印度尼西亚政府是与适用法律进行比较的对象。
{"title":"Concept of Illegal Fishing for Indonesian Regulations and UNCLOS","authors":"Karina Tri Ambarsari, Ilham Rahmansyah, Andi Muhammad Fajar Abidin, Aurellya Desita Ananda Putri","doi":"10.20473/ydk.v38i1.38045","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v38i1.38045","url":null,"abstract":"Illegal fishing is a transnational crime that needs special attention in its eradication to safeguard national sovereignty. Illegal fishing law enforcement and the protection of marine assets in Indonesia are based on the Shipping Law, Fisheries Law, Ministerial Regulations, and UNCLOS. Must be protected by any actions related to opportunities for crime to occur. There is no legal protection for potential geographical indications as a communal right of the people in Indonesia. This paper adopted the normative method with data sources drawn from primary and secondary legal materials. In addition, control practices are important in the fight against illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing. From here, the sinking of the ship became one of the control programmes. The current perspective on the problem of sinking or destroying fishing vessels is not from a legal aspect but from a standard or guideline for implementing procedures that have not been regulated, even though the Indonesian government is the subject of comparison with applicable laws.","PeriodicalId":31372,"journal":{"name":"Yuridika","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48657309","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Elimination of Discrimination Against Women & CEDAW: to What Extent is it Jus Cogens? 消除对妇女歧视和消除对妇女一切形式歧视公约:在多大程度上是正义的?
Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.20473/ydk.v38i1.41663
Rr Kunti Dewi Adriane Kusumowardono
The international community gathers on occasion to try and achieve specific purposes, through the development of a system of guidance, norms and regulations for States to observe, commonly called international law. There have been many achievements by the international community working together for the collective interests of the States, for example through the creation of human rights law. Many international treaties have been passed that bind the States to achieve the desired collective purposes. One of these is the Convention on The Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, which departs from the fundamental norms set by the United Nations Charter as well as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights about equality between the rights of men and women for their dignity and freedom. However, several States that are party to the Convention have reserved some of the articles, and there is some controversy around it. Therefore, it is the purpose of this article to analyse whether the concept of eliminating discrimination against women and the values and norms contained in CEDAW can be categorised as Jus Cogens norms, in view of the fact that it is a manifestation of the human rights values agreed upon by the international community. Moreover, this article will also analyse the Convention’s implications on domestic norms in States with significant reservations to the Convention.
国际社会有时会聚集在一起,通过制定一套供各国遵守的指导、规范和条例,通常称为国际法,努力实现具体目的。国际社会为各国的集体利益共同努力,例如通过制定人权法,取得了许多成就。已经通过了许多国际条约,约束各国实现所期望的集体目的。其中之一是《消除对妇女一切形式歧视公约》,该公约背离了《联合国宪章》和《世界人权宣言》关于男女尊严和自由权利平等的基本准则。然而,《公约》的几个缔约国保留了一些条款,并且围绕着这些条款存在一些争议。因此,本条的目的是分析消除对妇女歧视的概念以及《消除对妇女一切形式歧视公约》所载的价值观和规范是否可以归类为Jus-Cogens规范,鉴于这是国际社会商定的人权价值观的体现。此外,本条还将分析《公约》对对《公约》有重大保留的国家的国内规范的影响。
{"title":"Elimination of Discrimination Against Women & CEDAW: to What Extent is it Jus Cogens?","authors":"Rr Kunti Dewi Adriane Kusumowardono","doi":"10.20473/ydk.v38i1.41663","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v38i1.41663","url":null,"abstract":"The international community gathers on occasion to try and achieve specific purposes, through the development of a system of guidance, norms and regulations for States to observe, commonly called international law. There have been many achievements by the international community working together for the collective interests of the States, for example through the creation of human rights law. Many international treaties have been passed that bind the States to achieve the desired collective purposes. One of these is the Convention on The Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, which departs from the fundamental norms set by the United Nations Charter as well as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights about equality between the rights of men and women for their dignity and freedom. However, several States that are party to the Convention have reserved some of the articles, and there is some controversy around it. Therefore, it is the purpose of this article to analyse whether the concept of eliminating discrimination against women and the values and norms contained in CEDAW can be categorised as Jus Cogens norms, in view of the fact that it is a manifestation of the human rights values agreed upon by the international community. Moreover, this article will also analyse the Convention’s implications on domestic norms in States with significant reservations to the Convention.","PeriodicalId":31372,"journal":{"name":"Yuridika","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49363669","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Implementation of Juvenile Reprimand in Indonesia 印度尼西亚青少年惩戒制度的实施
Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.20473/ydk.v38i1.33857
Sarwirini Sarwirini, Trian Diarsa
Eight years on from the enactment of Law of The Republic Indonesia No. 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, there is no implementing regulation that regulates the reprimand sanction imposed on children. In other countries, for example in the United States, a reprimand is called a judicial warning or reprimand and is implemented in front of a public trial by a judge, who verbally warns children, following which they are returned to their parents and have no obligation that must be met regarding the criminal acts they have committed. This type of penalty is mostly imposed on a juvenile who is guilty of their first offence, as well as against non-violent crimes. The placement of the reprimand in Article 77 Paragraph (1) of JCJS Act is not without purpose, but this is a form of protection for children of criminal offenders and provides choices for judges in imposing sanctions other than imprisonment. Using normative legal methods, this research examines the current practice of implementing the reprimand sanction and proposes possible suggestions for its improvement.
自2012年颁布《印度尼西亚共和国关于青少年刑事司法系统的第11号法律》以来的八年里,没有任何实施条例对对儿童的谴责制裁作出规定。在其他国家,例如在美国,谴责被称为司法警告或谴责,由法官在公开审判前实施,法官口头警告儿童,之后他们被送回父母身边,对他们所犯的犯罪行为没有必须履行的义务。这种惩罚主要针对初犯的青少年以及非暴力犯罪。JCJS法案第77条第(1)款中的谴责并非没有目的,但这是对刑事罪犯子女的一种保护形式,为法官实施监禁以外的制裁提供了选择。本研究运用规范的法律方法,考察了我国目前实施惩戒处分的实践,并提出了可能的改进建议。
{"title":"Implementation of Juvenile Reprimand in Indonesia","authors":"Sarwirini Sarwirini, Trian Diarsa","doi":"10.20473/ydk.v38i1.33857","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v38i1.33857","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000\u0000\u0000Eight years on from the enactment of Law of The Republic Indonesia No. 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, there is no implementing regulation that regulates the reprimand sanction imposed on children. In other countries, for example in the United States, a reprimand is called a judicial warning or reprimand and is implemented in front of a public trial by a judge, who verbally warns children, following which they are returned to their parents and have no obligation that must be met regarding the criminal acts they have committed. This type of penalty is mostly imposed on a juvenile who is guilty of their first offence, as well as against non-violent crimes. The placement of the reprimand in Article 77 Paragraph (1) of JCJS Act is not without purpose, but this is a form of protection for children of criminal offenders and provides choices for judges in imposing sanctions other than imprisonment. Using normative legal methods, this research examines the current practice of implementing the reprimand sanction and proposes possible suggestions for its improvement.\u0000\u0000\u0000","PeriodicalId":31372,"journal":{"name":"Yuridika","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47341201","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Restorative Justice for Corruption Cases the Settlement of Corruption Cases: is it Possible? 腐败案件的恢复性司法——腐败案件的解决:可能吗?
Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.20473/ydk.v38i1.42511
Rizal Faharuddin, Jefferson Hakim
The Corruption Law of Indonesia regulate the return of the state’s losses suffered by state shall not exclude the criminal acts performed by the perpetrators. In practice, the state’s financial loss due to corruption is less than the cost of enforcing the relevant law. Furthermore, a corruption case requires manpower and lengthy process. Thus, the novel idea of settling minor state financial losses in corruption cases by means of returning the losses is considered more effective when applied with certain conditions. The research method of this study is normative judicial. The data used are primary, secondary and tertiary. This study argues that the concept of restorative justice could be applied to the settlement of corruption cases with minor state finance losses with certain conditions. The restorative justice approach to handling cases of corruption emphasises the restoration of the original state of affairs prior to the corruption, the application of restorative justice includes the stoppage of cases in the examination, investigation, and prosecution stages by considering the interest of the state, society, and other legal interests to be protected, the avoidance of negative stigma and retaliation, as well as society’s response to such as resolution.
印度尼西亚《腐败法》规定了国家损失的返还。国家不应排除犯罪者实施的犯罪行为。在实践中,国家因腐败造成的财政损失小于执行相关法律的成本。此外,腐败案件需要人力和漫长的程序。因此,通过返还损失来解决腐败案件中轻微的国家财政损失的新颖想法在特定条件下应用时被认为更有效。本研究的研究方法是规范司法。所使用的数据有一级、二级和三级。本研究认为,在一定条件下,恢复性司法的概念可以适用于解决国家财政损失较小的腐败案件。处理腐败案件的恢复性司法方法强调恢复腐败发生前的原状,恢复性司法的应用包括在审查、调查和起诉阶段停止案件,考虑到国家、社会和其他需要保护的法律利益,避免负面污名和报复,以及社会对此类决议的反应。
{"title":"Restorative Justice for Corruption Cases the Settlement of Corruption Cases: is it Possible?","authors":"Rizal Faharuddin, Jefferson Hakim","doi":"10.20473/ydk.v38i1.42511","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v38i1.42511","url":null,"abstract":"The Corruption Law of Indonesia regulate the return of the state’s losses suffered by state shall not exclude the criminal acts performed by the perpetrators. In practice, the state’s financial loss due to corruption is less than the cost of enforcing the relevant law. Furthermore, a corruption case requires manpower and lengthy process. Thus, the novel idea of settling minor state financial losses in corruption cases by means of returning the losses is considered more effective when applied with certain conditions. The research method of this study is normative judicial. The data used are primary, secondary and tertiary. This study argues that the concept of restorative justice could be applied to the settlement of corruption cases with minor state finance losses with certain conditions. The restorative justice approach to handling cases of corruption emphasises the restoration of the original state of affairs prior to the corruption, the application of restorative justice includes the stoppage of cases in the examination, investigation, and prosecution stages by considering the interest of the state, society, and other legal interests to be protected, the avoidance of negative stigma and retaliation, as well as society’s response to such as resolution.","PeriodicalId":31372,"journal":{"name":"Yuridika","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41860933","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Breach of Contract Settlement of Quasi Equity Agreement Between Investor With Indigenous People Soa Nacikit Migodo at Buru Island 投资者与土著人民之间的准股权协议的违约结算Soa Nacikit Migodo在布鲁岛
Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.20473/ydk.v38i1.37709
A. I. Laturette
Indigenous lands belonging to indigenous peoples are regulated by their respective customary laws. The land is seen as something very valuable and must be defended by the indigenous people. Customary land is land belonging to the customary law community unit. Under the system of land ownership according to customary law, indigenous people can gain ownership over a piece of land by clearing forests, inheriting land, receiving land as a gift, exchanging or granting land with or to another, or expiry/verjaring. This research is a sociological legal research, a legal research method that uses empirical facts taken from human behavior, both verbal behavior obtained from interviews and real behavior through direct observation. Empirical research is also used to observe the results of human behavior in the form of physical and archives. In the profit-sharing agreement between PT. Panbers Jaya and the Soa Nacikit indigenous people, PT. Panbers Jaya was in default because it did not carry out its obligations according to the agreement. After deliberation between the parties, the agreed-upon settlement is that PT. Panbers Jaya will give the agreed rights within the new timeframe.
属于土著人民的土著土地由其各自的习惯法加以管理。土地被视为非常宝贵的东西,必须由土著人民捍卫。习惯法土地是属于习惯法共同体单位的土地。根据习惯法规定的土地所有权制度,土著人民可以通过砍伐森林、继承土地、作为礼物接受土地、与他人交换或授予土地、或期满/归还土地等方式获得对一块土地的所有权。本研究是一种社会学法律研究,是一种利用从人类行为中获取的经验事实的法律研究方法,既包括通过访谈获得的口头行为,也包括通过直接观察获得的真实行为。实证研究也用于以实物和档案的形式观察人类行为的结果。在PT. Panbers Jaya与Soa nacicit土著人民之间的利润分享协议中,PT. Panbers Jaya违约,因为它没有根据协议履行其义务。经过双方的商议,双方同意的解决方案是,PT. Panbers Jaya将在新的时间框架内给予商定的权利。
{"title":"Breach of Contract Settlement of Quasi Equity Agreement Between Investor With Indigenous People Soa Nacikit Migodo at Buru Island","authors":"A. I. Laturette","doi":"10.20473/ydk.v38i1.37709","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v38i1.37709","url":null,"abstract":"Indigenous lands belonging to indigenous peoples are regulated by their respective customary laws. The land is seen as something very valuable and must be defended by the indigenous people. Customary land is land belonging to the customary law community unit. Under the system of land ownership according to customary law, indigenous people can gain ownership over a piece of land by clearing forests, inheriting land, receiving land as a gift, exchanging or granting land with or to another, or expiry/verjaring. This research is a sociological legal research, a legal research method that uses empirical facts taken from human behavior, both verbal behavior obtained from interviews and real behavior through direct observation. Empirical research is also used to observe the results of human behavior in the form of physical and archives. In the profit-sharing agreement between PT. Panbers Jaya and the Soa Nacikit indigenous people, PT. Panbers Jaya was in default because it did not carry out its obligations according to the agreement. After deliberation between the parties, the agreed-upon settlement is that PT. Panbers Jaya will give the agreed rights within the new timeframe.","PeriodicalId":31372,"journal":{"name":"Yuridika","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67620366","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reconstruction of Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard Verdict In the Law of Civil Procedure as a Manifestation of Fast, Simple, Low Cost and Complete Principle of Justice 作为快速、简单、低成本和完全公正原则的体现——对《民事诉讼法》中涅特·翁特万凯利克·韦克拉德判决的重构
Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI: 10.20473/ydk.v37i3.41047
Samsiati Samsiati
Dispute resolution through court is more favorable because the binding decisions of judges can resolve cases. This study discusses ratio legis of niet ontvankelijke verklaard in the law of civil procedure and in the formulation of the delimitation of the judge in giving niet ontvankelijke verklaard in the fast, simple, low cost, and complete settlement of civil disputes. This study used legal research methods with legislation and conceptual approaches. The result of the study showed that The limitation of the judge in examining the lawsuit that does not meet the formal requirements and decides the lawsuit is inadmissible (niet onvankelijk verklaard), in the absence of fast, simple, low-cost, and complete civil disputes, as stated in the Draft Bill of the Law of Civil Procedure, which is essentially related to the types of exceptions that can become the basis for the judge in determining the lawsuit to be inadmissible (niet onvankelijk verklaard). Indonesia's current civil procedure laws, HIR and RBg, do not specifically outline the standards that a judge must employ to declare that a matter is inappropriate for filing (niet onvankelijk verklaard). Before making a ruling that is not admissible (niet onvankelijk verklaard) in the settlement, the judge must be aware of his or her restrictions in this situation. As stated in the Draft Bill of the Law of Civil Procedure, the judge is limited in examining lawsuits that do not meet the formal requirements and deciding that the lawsuit is inadmissible (niet onvankelijk verklaard), in the absence of quick, easy, inexpensive, and comprehensive civil disputes. This limitation is essentially related to the types of exceptions that can become the basis for the judge in determining that the lawsuit is inadmissible (niet onvankelijk verklaard)
通过法院解决纠纷更有利,因为法官的有约束力的裁决可以解决案件。本研究探讨了民事诉讼法中niet ontvankelijke verklaard的比例立法以及法官在制定划界案时给予niet onTVankelijk verklaad快速、简单、低成本、完全解决民事纠纷的方法。本研究采用了法律研究方法、立法和概念方法。研究结果表明,正如《民事诉讼法草案》所述,在没有快速、简单、低成本和完整的民事纠纷的情况下,法官审查不符合正式要求并决定诉讼不可受理的诉讼的限制(niet onvankelijk verklaard),这基本上与可以成为法官确定诉讼不可受理的依据的例外类型有关(niet-onvankelijk-verklaard)。印度尼西亚现行的民事诉讼法,HIR和RBg,并没有具体规定法官必须采用的标准来宣布某件事不适合提交(niet onvankelijk verklaard)。在做出和解中不可受理的裁决(niet onvankelijk verklaard)之前,法官必须意识到他或她在这种情况下的限制。正如《民事诉讼法法案草案》所述,在没有快速、简单、廉价和全面的民事纠纷的情况下,法官在审查不符合正式要求的诉讼并决定诉讼不可受理方面受到限制(niet onvankelijk verklaard)。这一限制本质上与可以成为法官确定诉讼不可受理的依据的例外类型有关(niet onvankelijk verklaard)
{"title":"Reconstruction of Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard Verdict In the Law of Civil Procedure as a Manifestation of Fast, Simple, Low Cost and Complete Principle of Justice","authors":"Samsiati Samsiati","doi":"10.20473/ydk.v37i3.41047","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v37i3.41047","url":null,"abstract":"Dispute resolution through court is more favorable because the binding decisions of judges can resolve cases. This study discusses ratio legis of niet ontvankelijke verklaard in the law of civil procedure and in the formulation of the delimitation of the judge in giving niet ontvankelijke verklaard in the fast, simple, low cost, and complete settlement of civil disputes. This study used legal research methods with legislation and conceptual approaches. The result of the study showed that The limitation of the judge in examining the lawsuit that does not meet the formal requirements and decides the lawsuit is inadmissible (niet onvankelijk verklaard), in the absence of fast, simple, low-cost, and complete civil disputes, as stated in the Draft Bill of the Law of Civil Procedure, which is essentially related to the types of exceptions that can become the basis for the judge in determining the lawsuit to be inadmissible (niet onvankelijk verklaard). Indonesia's current civil procedure laws, HIR and RBg, do not specifically outline the standards that a judge must employ to declare that a matter is inappropriate for filing (niet onvankelijk verklaard). Before making a ruling that is not admissible (niet onvankelijk verklaard) in the settlement, the judge must be aware of his or her restrictions in this situation. As stated in the Draft Bill of the Law of Civil Procedure, the judge is limited in examining lawsuits that do not meet the formal requirements and deciding that the lawsuit is inadmissible (niet onvankelijk verklaard), in the absence of quick, easy, inexpensive, and comprehensive civil disputes. This limitation is essentially related to the types of exceptions that can become the basis for the judge in determining that the lawsuit is inadmissible (niet onvankelijk verklaard)","PeriodicalId":31372,"journal":{"name":"Yuridika","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46328718","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The use of Language In International Agreements According to The 1969 Vienna Convention And Its Implementation In Indonesian National Law 1969年《维也纳公约》国际协定中语言的使用及其在印度尼西亚国内法中的实施
Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI: 10.20473/ydk.v37i3.28448
Jean Elvardi, Firman Hasan, A. Pratama
The use of language in international agreements is very important to establish international cooperation. It is also noteworthy that according to the Indonesian law, the international agreements related to several matters adopted by the government shall be translated to Bahasa Indonesia. However, the terms contained in Indonesian national law, in Bahasa Indonesia, often tend to be different from the meanings contained in international law, such as the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Thus, they often have multiple interpretations. As such, the use of language, especially relating to international agreements, can be a trigger for legal disputes. In this regard, using a legal research method by analyzing the international legal instruments and Indonesian national law, this paper digs into the use of language related to the adoption of an international agreement to an Indonesian Law, especially regarding the terms of “ratification,” “accession,”  and others. It is argued that there is a difference of perspective within the “adoption of an international agreement” regarding the terms of “ratification” and “accession” under the 1969 Vienna Convention.
国际协议中语言的使用对于建立国际合作是非常重要的。值得注意的是,根据印尼法律,政府通过的与若干事项有关的国际协定必须翻译成印尼语。但是,印度尼西亚国内法中以印尼语编写的术语往往与国际法,例如1969年《维也纳条约法公约》中所载的含义不同。因此,它们通常有多种解释。因此,语言的使用,特别是与国际协定有关的语言的使用,可能会引发法律纠纷。在这方面,本文采用法律研究方法,通过分析国际法律文书和印度尼西亚国内法,深入研究与印度尼西亚法律采用国际协议相关的语言使用,特别是关于“批准”,“加入”等条款。有人认为,就1969年《维也纳公约》“批准”和“加入”的条件而言,在“通过一项国际协定”方面存在不同的观点。
{"title":"The use of Language In International Agreements According to The 1969 Vienna Convention And Its Implementation In Indonesian National Law","authors":"Jean Elvardi, Firman Hasan, A. Pratama","doi":"10.20473/ydk.v37i3.28448","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v37i3.28448","url":null,"abstract":"The use of language in international agreements is very important to establish international cooperation. It is also noteworthy that according to the Indonesian law, the international agreements related to several matters adopted by the government shall be translated to Bahasa Indonesia. However, the terms contained in Indonesian national law, in Bahasa Indonesia, often tend to be different from the meanings contained in international law, such as the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Thus, they often have multiple interpretations. As such, the use of language, especially relating to international agreements, can be a trigger for legal disputes. In this regard, using a legal research method by analyzing the international legal instruments and Indonesian national law, this paper digs into the use of language related to the adoption of an international agreement to an Indonesian Law, especially regarding the terms of “ratification,” “accession,”  and others. It is argued that there is a difference of perspective within the “adoption of an international agreement” regarding the terms of “ratification” and “accession” under the 1969 Vienna Convention.","PeriodicalId":31372,"journal":{"name":"Yuridika","volume":"23 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41271278","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Yuridika
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1