BACKGROUND: Access to high-quality cancer care in the United States remains a challenge in part due to a geographic mismatch between patients with cancers and the oncologic specialists best able to serve them. There is therefore an urgent need to develop communications strategies that allow oncologists to determine which patients might benefit from referral for subspecialty cancer care, and to allow subspecialists to guide care remotely when patients are unable or unwilling to travel. Unfortunately, virtual consultation between clinicians has been understudied, and likely underutilized, in cancer care. Health systems may be hesitant to implement a virtual consultation program without data on such a program’s value. RESEARCH DESIGN: In this article we outline a framework for calculating the value on investment (VOI) for a provider-to-provider virtual consultation framework to improve geographic access to cancer care. For each element of VOI, we suggest specific outcomes that health systems might utilize to determine the value of implementing virtual provider-to-provider consultation. RESULTS: Elements of VOI include: direct and indirect revenue, institutional halo effect, hospital-based care, infrastructure considerations, subspecialty resource utilization, continuity of care, patient-reported outcomes, clinical trial enrollment, and program monitoring and quality improvement. CONCLUSION: Implementation of virtual consultation between general and subspecialty oncologists offers health systems the potential for substantial value on investment, largely through improving clinical outcomes by optimizing the resources involved in patients’ cancer care.
{"title":"Determining the Value-on-Investment of Provider-to-Provider Virtual Consultation for Cancer Care","authors":"D. Shalowitz, B. Arkwright, E. Bunce","doi":"10.30953/tmt.v8.411","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30953/tmt.v8.411","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Access to high-quality cancer care in the United States remains a challenge in part due to a geographic mismatch between patients with cancers and the oncologic specialists best able to serve them. There is therefore an urgent need to develop communications strategies that allow oncologists to determine which patients might benefit from referral for subspecialty cancer care, and to allow subspecialists to guide care remotely when patients are unable or unwilling to travel. Unfortunately, virtual consultation between clinicians has been understudied, and likely underutilized, in cancer care. Health systems may be hesitant to implement a virtual consultation program without data on such a program’s value. \u0000 \u0000RESEARCH DESIGN: In this article we outline a framework for calculating the value on investment (VOI) for a provider-to-provider virtual consultation framework to improve geographic access to cancer care. For each element of VOI, we suggest specific outcomes that health systems might utilize to determine the value of implementing virtual provider-to-provider consultation. \u0000 \u0000RESULTS: Elements of VOI include: direct and indirect revenue, institutional halo effect, hospital-based care, infrastructure considerations, subspecialty resource utilization, continuity of care, patient-reported outcomes, clinical trial enrollment, and program monitoring and quality improvement. \u0000 \u0000CONCLUSION: Implementation of virtual consultation between general and subspecialty oncologists offers health systems the potential for substantial value on investment, largely through improving clinical outcomes by optimizing the resources involved in patients’ cancer care.","PeriodicalId":320236,"journal":{"name":"Telehealth and Medicine Today","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127975005","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Lo que la pandemia nos dejó: avances regulatorios para la telemedicina y la telesalud en Argentina","authors":"Daniela Chueke","doi":"10.30953/tmt.v8.417","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30953/tmt.v8.417","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":320236,"journal":{"name":"Telehealth and Medicine Today","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115294039","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jacqueline Sandling, Kathleen Carrothers, David Svec
Background: Reducing Length of Stay (LOS) is an important way for hospitals to improve emergency department (ED) costs and outcomes. Psychiatric patients represent a challenge to reducing LOS as the scarcity of psychiatric specialists leads to longer LOS. Previous literature describes the unique solutions different hospitals have employed across the US, but does not give methods for evaluating or selecting a solution that can be applied to other hospitals. Methods: A mixed methods exploratory sequential design was retrospectively registered in order to build and subsequently test a contextually appropriate evaluation framework. First, interviews with hospital staff were conducted in a qualitative phase, the results of which were used to develop an evaluation framework as a quantitative instrument. This evaluation framework was subsequently tested using a large sample of observational ED case data from one community hospital, as well as pricing data resulting from market research on psychiatry services. This information, along with projected return on investment, was aggregated to create a holistic model for evaluating different telepsychiatry service options and selecting the one with the best fit. Results: Our methodology identified 8 key factors that captured the overall difficulty of implementation and benefits associated with each service option. These factors were used to develop a prioritization model that identifies the one psychiatric service improving psychiatric LOS and best fitting the hospital’s overall priorities and operations. Conclusion: The Prioritization Model created in this study was instrumental in selecting the solution for reducing LOS in a way that best meets patients’ and hospitals’ needs. This model may be applied to other hospitals in the U.S. to provide a holistic review and direct comparison of opportunities.
{"title":"Prioritization Model for Emergency Telepsychiatry Service Evaluation and Selection","authors":"Jacqueline Sandling, Kathleen Carrothers, David Svec","doi":"10.30953/thmt.v8.412","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30953/thmt.v8.412","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Reducing Length of Stay (LOS) is an important way for hospitals to improve emergency department (ED) costs and outcomes. Psychiatric patients represent a challenge to reducing LOS as the scarcity of psychiatric specialists leads to longer LOS. Previous literature describes the unique solutions different hospitals have employed across the US, but does not give methods for evaluating or selecting a solution that can be applied to other hospitals. \u0000Methods: A mixed methods exploratory sequential design was retrospectively registered in order to build and subsequently test a contextually appropriate evaluation framework. First, interviews with hospital staff were conducted in a qualitative phase, the results of which were used to develop an evaluation framework as a quantitative instrument. This evaluation framework was subsequently tested using a large sample of observational ED case data from one community hospital, as well as pricing data resulting from market research on psychiatry services. This information, along with projected return on investment, was aggregated to create a holistic model for evaluating different telepsychiatry service options and selecting the one with the best fit. \u0000Results: Our methodology identified 8 key factors that captured the overall difficulty of implementation and benefits associated with each service option. These factors were used to develop a prioritization model that identifies the one psychiatric service improving psychiatric LOS and best fitting the hospital’s overall priorities and operations. \u0000Conclusion: The Prioritization Model created in this study was instrumental in selecting the solution for reducing LOS in a way that best meets patients’ and hospitals’ needs. This model may be applied to other hospitals in the U.S. to provide a holistic review and direct comparison of opportunities.","PeriodicalId":320236,"journal":{"name":"Telehealth and Medicine Today","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126800207","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Among its many side effects, the COVID-19 pandemic left several positive results. This article talks about one of the main positive effects in the post-pandemic period: the adoption of telemedicine and telehealth, two related disciplines that were already present in several Latin American countries, but which in the past two years came to be a solution for delivering medical care to patients. Factors such as social-distancing measures, the lack of knowledge about the virus at the beginning of the pandemic that led to strict protective measures being taken in hospitals and doctors’ offices, restricting face-to-face care of patients to a bare minimum, and the rapid response of governments, health care institutions, payers, and professionals, provided the conditions that telemedicine and telehealth had needed for many years to flourish and occupy the predominant place they currently have in the global health ecosystem. All the benefits of remote patient care became clear at a time in world history that marked a turning point in the advancement of information and communication technologies for health. In this report we will look at the regulatory frameworks adopted during or since the COVID-19 pandemic from 2020 onward in Argentina. Spanish Language Translation http://dx.doi.org/10.30953/tmt.v8.417 Este informe describe los marcos regulatorios adoptados durante y desde la pandemia de COVID-19 a partir de 2020 en Argentina, así como el impacto de estas disciplinas y cómo se relacionan con la expansión de la telemedicina y la telesalud en el sector sanitario de la región. Entre muchos de sus efectos inesperados la pan-demia de COVID-19 dejó varios saldos positivos. Este artículo habla acerca de uno de los principales efectos positivos en la post pandemia: la adopción de la telemedicina y la telesalud, dos disciplinas relacionadas que ya estaban presentes en varios países de Latinoamérica, pero que en los últimos dos años se revelaron como la solución para hacer llegar la atención médica a los pacientes. Factores como las medidas de distanciamiento social, el desconocimiento sobre el virus al comienzo de la pandemia que obligó a tomar medidas estrictas de protección a hospitales y consultorios médicos, restringiendo la atención presencial de pacientes al mínimo indispensable y la rápida respuesta de gobiernos, instituciones sanitarias, pagadores y profesionales, posibil-itaron el impulso que desde hacía muchos años precisaba la telemedicina y la telesalud para ocupar el lugar preponderante que actualmente está ocupando en el ecosistema sanitario mundial. Todos los beneficios de la atención remota de pacientes quedaron en evidencia en un momento de la historia del mundo que representa un punto de inflexión en el avance de las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación para la salud. En este reporte veremos cuáles fueron los marcos regulatorios adoptados durante o con posterioridad a la pandemia de Covid-19 a partir de 2020 hasta la fecha en Argenti
在诸多副作用中，COVID-19大流行留下了一些积极成果。本文讨论大流行后时期的主要积极影响之一:采用远程医疗和远程保健，这是几个拉丁美洲国家已经存在的两个相关学科，但在过去两年中成为向患者提供医疗服务的解决方案。社会隔离措施、大流行开始时对病毒缺乏了解导致医院和医生办公室采取严格的保护措施、将患者面对面护理限制在最低限度、以及政府、卫生保健机构、付款人和专业人员迅速作出反应等因素，提供了远程医疗和远程保健多年来蓬勃发展所需的条件，并占据了它们目前在全球卫生生态系统中的主导地位。在世界历史上标志着卫生信息和通信技术进步的一个转折点的时刻，远程病人护理的所有好处变得清晰起来。在本报告中，我们将研究阿根廷在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间或自2020年以来采用的监管框架。西班牙语翻译http://dx.doi.org/10.30953/tmt.v8.417Este信息描述阿根廷2020年新冠肺炎大流行期间采取的监管措施，así各学科的影响通过cómo与远程医疗的关系和联系expansión通过远程医疗的联系和卫生部门的联系región。在COVID-19大流行暴发期间，有许多影响因素dejó各种阳性saldos。埃斯特危象你acerca de uno de los螯对positivos en la邮政大流行病:la adopcion de la la telesalud telemedicina y dos disciplinas relacionadas,丫estaban目前在各类《de Latinoamerica佩罗,在洛杉矶上月的dos岁se revelaron科莫la solucion帕拉做的人们atencion正在洛pacientes。工厂管理远程社交媒体、远程社交媒体、远程社交媒体、远程社交媒体、远程社交媒体、远程社交媒体、远程社交媒体、远程社交媒体、远程社交媒体、远程社交媒体、远程社交媒体、远程社交媒体、远程社交媒体、远程社交媒体、远程社交媒体、远程社交媒体、远程社交媒体、远程社交媒体、远程社交媒体、远程社交媒体、远程社交媒体、远程社交媒体。可能性-itaron el impulse que desde hacía much chos años precisaba la telemedicina by la telemalud para ococonderante que actualmentes estocupando en el ecosistema sanitario mundial。身体锻炼耐力de la atencion remota de pacientes quedaron en evidencia en联合国纪念品de la史学家德尔》,是联合国punto de转调en el皇冠de las tecnologias de la给y一样均出自同一名设计师la手“祝您健康。eneste报告了veremos cuáles fueron los marcos监管机构采用的2019冠状病毒病大流行疫情防控措施，并于2020年在阿根廷实施。
{"title":"What the Pandemic Left Us: Regulatory Advances for Telemedicine and Telehealth in Argentina","authors":"Daniela Chueke","doi":"10.30953/thmt.v8.413","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30953/thmt.v8.413","url":null,"abstract":"Among its many side effects, the COVID-19 pandemic left several positive results. This article talks about one of the main positive effects in the post-pandemic period: the adoption of telemedicine and telehealth, two related disciplines that were already present in several Latin American countries, but which in the past two years came to be a solution for delivering medical care to patients.\u0000Factors such as social-distancing measures, the lack of knowledge about the virus at the beginning of the pandemic that led to strict protective measures being taken in hospitals and doctors’ offices, restricting face-to-face care of patients to a bare minimum, and the rapid response of governments, health care institutions, payers, and professionals, provided the conditions that telemedicine and telehealth had needed for many years to flourish and occupy the predominant place they currently have in the global health ecosystem.\u0000All the benefits of remote patient care became clear at a time in world history that marked a turning point in the advancement of information and communication technologies for health. In this report we will look at the regulatory frameworks adopted during or since the COVID-19 pandemic from 2020 onward in Argentina.\u0000Spanish Language Translation \u0000http://dx.doi.org/10.30953/tmt.v8.417\u0000Este informe describe los marcos regulatorios adoptados durante y desde la pandemia de COVID-19 a partir de 2020 en Argentina, así como el impacto de estas disciplinas y cómo se relacionan con la expansión de la telemedicina y la telesalud en el sector sanitario de la región. Entre muchos de sus efectos inesperados la pan-demia de COVID-19 dejó varios saldos positivos. Este artículo habla acerca de uno de los principales efectos positivos en la post pandemia: la adopción de la telemedicina y la telesalud, dos disciplinas relacionadas que ya estaban presentes en varios países de Latinoamérica, pero que en los últimos dos años se revelaron como la solución para hacer llegar la atención médica a los pacientes. Factores como las medidas de distanciamiento social, el desconocimiento sobre el virus al comienzo de la pandemia que obligó a tomar medidas estrictas de protección a hospitales y consultorios médicos, restringiendo la atención presencial de pacientes al mínimo indispensable y la rápida respuesta de gobiernos, instituciones sanitarias, pagadores y profesionales, posibil-itaron el impulso que desde hacía muchos años precisaba la telemedicina y la telesalud para ocupar el lugar preponderante que actualmente está ocupando en el ecosistema sanitario mundial. Todos los beneficios de la atención remota de pacientes quedaron en evidencia en un momento de la historia del mundo que representa un punto de inflexión en el avance de las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación para la salud. En este reporte veremos cuáles fueron los marcos regulatorios adoptados durante o con posterioridad a la pandemia de Covid-19 a partir de 2020 hasta la fecha en Argenti","PeriodicalId":320236,"journal":{"name":"Telehealth and Medicine Today","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133679126","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Maria Palombini, Tiffany Vereen, Jahnahn Taghiani, Tanvi Chitre
Objective: With the explosion in the use of telehealth technologies, it is essential to address the challenges in global telehealth inequity in order to create a path to healthcare equality. To this end, this research paper focuses on investigating telehealth as it relates to the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on healthcare inequality, telehealth inequity, and the continued vulnerabilities with increased demand in implementation. Study Design: A set of voluntary questions were e-mailed to active members of the IEEE-SA (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Standards Association) Transforming the Telehealth Paradigm: Sustainable Connectivity, Accessibility, Privacy, and Security for all. The interview answers were analyzed via deductive thematic analysis organized into higher themes and theme-specific codes. Setting: The country of residence varied among individuals who are the IEEE-SA Telehealth program members. These continents included: North America, South America, Africa, Asia, and Europe. Participants: Global healthcare leaders who are active members of the IEEE-SA Transforming the Telehealth Paradigm: Sustainable Connectivity, Accessibility, Privacy, and Security for all participated. The occupations of these individuals ranged from a variety of areas within the healthcare domain, such as physicians, scientists, and public health experts. Main outcome measure: Qualitative data obtained voluntarily from global healthcare leaders participating in the IEEE-SA Transforming the Telehealth Paradigm: Sustainable Connectivity, Accessibility, Privacy, and Security for all. Results: The major themes that emerged from the participants' responses included: telehealth infrastructure and access, digital literacy and user interface, government regulations, and telehealth legislation. Conclusions: Telehealth has the power to decrease healthcare disparities, thus getting closer to achieving health equity. However, there are three significant common global barriers to the implementation of telehealth: infrastructure, digital literacy, and government regulations. Because the results were based on interviewer responses, the conclusions acknowledged how the background of respondents, including career and education, influenced their experiences and, thus, the responses. Suggestions for change in reducing barriers to telehealth accessibility are detailed in this research. These suggestions were derived from respondents and focused on the global barriers to implementation. To reduce these barriers, changes in political health policy, patient health education, health provider telemedicine support, and in regulation for telemedicine are suggested. Limitations in our research project included a small sample size and the ensuing lack of representation from more geographical regions.
{"title":"Building a Framework for a More Inclusive Healthcare System","authors":"Maria Palombini, Tiffany Vereen, Jahnahn Taghiani, Tanvi Chitre","doi":"10.30953/tmt.v8.414","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30953/tmt.v8.414","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: With the explosion in the use of telehealth technologies, it is essential to address the challenges in global telehealth inequity in order to create a path to healthcare equality. To this end, this research paper focuses on investigating telehealth as it relates to the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on healthcare inequality, telehealth inequity, and the continued vulnerabilities with increased demand in implementation.\u0000Study Design: A set of voluntary questions were e-mailed to active members of the IEEE-SA (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Standards Association) Transforming the Telehealth Paradigm: Sustainable Connectivity, Accessibility, Privacy, and Security for all. The interview answers were analyzed via deductive thematic analysis organized into higher themes and theme-specific codes.\u0000Setting: The country of residence varied among individuals who are the IEEE-SA Telehealth program members. These continents included: North America, South America, Africa, Asia, and Europe.\u0000Participants: Global healthcare leaders who are active members of the IEEE-SA Transforming the Telehealth Paradigm: Sustainable Connectivity, Accessibility, Privacy, and Security for all participated. The occupations of these individuals ranged from a variety of areas within the healthcare domain, such as physicians, scientists, and public health experts.\u0000Main outcome measure: Qualitative data obtained voluntarily from global healthcare leaders participating in the IEEE-SA Transforming the Telehealth Paradigm: Sustainable Connectivity, Accessibility, Privacy, and Security for all.\u0000Results: The major themes that emerged from the participants' responses included: telehealth infrastructure and access, digital literacy and user interface, government regulations, and telehealth legislation.\u0000Conclusions: Telehealth has the power to decrease healthcare disparities, thus getting closer to achieving health equity. However, there are three significant common global barriers to the implementation of telehealth: infrastructure, digital literacy, and government regulations. Because the results were based on interviewer responses, the conclusions acknowledged how the background of respondents, including career and education, influenced their experiences and, thus, the responses. Suggestions for change in reducing barriers to telehealth accessibility are detailed in this research. These suggestions were derived from respondents and focused on the global barriers to implementation. To reduce these barriers, changes in political health policy, patient health education, health provider telemedicine support, and in regulation for telemedicine are suggested. Limitations in our research project included a small sample size and the ensuing lack of representation from more geographical regions.","PeriodicalId":320236,"journal":{"name":"Telehealth and Medicine Today","volume":"195 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114651797","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Predictive Models to Optimize Resources in Tele Critical Care in Distributed Hospital Networks","authors":"R. Palácios","doi":"10.30953/thmt.v8.408","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30953/thmt.v8.408","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":320236,"journal":{"name":"Telehealth and Medicine Today","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123031396","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Telehealth’s Role Enabling Sustainable Innovation and Circular Economies in Health","authors":"D. Kalogeropoulos","doi":"10.30953/thmt.v8.409","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30953/thmt.v8.409","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":320236,"journal":{"name":"Telehealth and Medicine Today","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126387155","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Telehealth in Medicine: Predictions 2023–2024","authors":"Jiang-hua Li","doi":"10.30953/thmt.v8.380","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30953/thmt.v8.380","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":320236,"journal":{"name":"Telehealth and Medicine Today","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131258143","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Teledermoscopy – An Emerging Technology for Skin Cancer Detection","authors":"Kristen Delans","doi":"10.30953/thmt.v8.376","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30953/thmt.v8.376","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":320236,"journal":{"name":"Telehealth and Medicine Today","volume":"179 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116607051","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This article discusses the penetration of telemedicine in Latin America in relation to its implementation by hospitals in the region, considering key Latin American hospital markets, including Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, and Peru. It gives an overview of the hospitals, the challenges they face in implementing telemedicine and telehealth services in each country, with a characterization of the various health systems, and presents telemedicine as an aid to the shortage of doctors and specialists in remote or hard-to-reach areas. It discusses the anticipated effects on patients and providers, and the main challenges for implementation. To prepare the report, interviews were held with specialists, who spoke about some of the major initiatives in the region. Lastly, it offers recommendations based on market intelligence gleaned from Global Health Intelligence data.
{"title":"Penetration of Telemedicine and Telehealth in Latin American Hospitals","authors":"Carolina Cházaro","doi":"10.30953/thmt.v8.383","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30953/thmt.v8.383","url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses the penetration of telemedicine in Latin America in relation to its implementation by hospitals in the region, considering key Latin American hospital markets, including Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, and Peru. It gives an overview of the hospitals, the challenges they face in implementing telemedicine and telehealth services in each country, with a characterization of the various health systems, and presents telemedicine as an aid to the shortage of doctors and specialists in remote or hard-to-reach areas. It discusses the anticipated effects on patients and providers, and the main challenges for implementation. To prepare the report, interviews were held with specialists, who spoke about some of the major initiatives in the region. Lastly, it offers recommendations based on market intelligence gleaned from Global Health Intelligence data.","PeriodicalId":320236,"journal":{"name":"Telehealth and Medicine Today","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124118017","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：