{"title":"Digitalisering og aktiv læring for språk og argumentasjon","authors":"Paal Fredrik Skjørten Kvarberg","doi":"10.18261/nft.57.1-2.4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18261/nft.57.1-2.4","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":32093,"journal":{"name":"Norsk Filosofisk Tidsskrift","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44077365","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-11-27DOI: 10.18261/issn.1504-2901-2021-04-03
Richard Sørli
{"title":"Om G. A. Cohen om penger og frihet","authors":"Richard Sørli","doi":"10.18261/issn.1504-2901-2021-04-03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-2901-2021-04-03","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":32093,"journal":{"name":"Norsk Filosofisk Tidsskrift","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48915767","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-11-27DOI: 10.18261/issn.1504-2901-2021-04-06
Elin Svenneby
{"title":"Ingeborg W. Owesen: The Genealogy of Modern Feminist Thinking. Feminist Thought as Historical Present","authors":"Elin Svenneby","doi":"10.18261/issn.1504-2901-2021-04-06","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-2901-2021-04-06","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":32093,"journal":{"name":"Norsk Filosofisk Tidsskrift","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67709906","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-11-27DOI: 10.18261/issn.1504-2901-2021-04-04
Anders Malkomsen, Carl Tollef Solberg
{"title":"Verdien av mening og meningsløshet","authors":"Anders Malkomsen, Carl Tollef Solberg","doi":"10.18261/issn.1504-2901-2021-04-04","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-2901-2021-04-04","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":32093,"journal":{"name":"Norsk Filosofisk Tidsskrift","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67709840","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-09-09DOI: 10.18261/issn.1504-2901-2021-02-03-05
J. Pedersen
{"title":"FNs bærekraftsmål og Norges rolle","authors":"J. Pedersen","doi":"10.18261/issn.1504-2901-2021-02-03-05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-2901-2021-02-03-05","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":32093,"journal":{"name":"Norsk Filosofisk Tidsskrift","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41502687","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-09-09DOI: 10.18261/issn.1504-2901-2021-02-03-07
C. Heyward
The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change principle of ‘common but differentiated responsibility’ admits many interpretations. In the philosophical literature on climate justice, it has typically been cashed out in terms of the following three principles: the ability to pay principle (APP), the beneficiary pays principle (BPP), and the contribution to problem principle (CPP). Many of these accounts have given prominence to the CPP and APP, but there are some who argue that the BPP deserves greater consideration. In this paper, I want to ask whether the BPP must feature in any plausible account of remedial responsibility for climate change. I examine this question by looking at three different ways in which the BPP has been incorporated into accounts of climate burden-sharing. In each case, there are questions about the particular role that the BPP is assigned and it looks like either the BPP must be given equal prominence to the CPP, or the BPP might be redundant when it comes to specific task of remedying the injustices of climate change. I suggest in the conclusion one possible reason to maintain the BPP.
{"title":"Is the beneficiary pays principle essential in climate justice?","authors":"C. Heyward","doi":"10.18261/issn.1504-2901-2021-02-03-07","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-2901-2021-02-03-07","url":null,"abstract":"The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change principle of ‘common but differentiated responsibility’ admits many interpretations. In the philosophical literature on climate justice, it has typically been cashed out in terms of the following three principles: the ability to pay principle (APP), the beneficiary pays principle (BPP), and the contribution to problem principle (CPP). Many of these accounts have given prominence to the CPP and APP, but there are some who argue that the BPP deserves greater consideration. In this paper, I want to ask whether the BPP must feature in any plausible account of remedial responsibility for climate change. I examine this question by looking at three different ways in which the BPP has been incorporated into accounts of climate burden-sharing. In each case, there are questions about the particular role that the BPP is assigned and it looks like either the BPP must be given equal prominence to the CPP, or the BPP might be redundant when it comes to specific task of remedying the injustices of climate change. I suggest in the conclusion one possible reason to maintain the BPP.","PeriodicalId":32093,"journal":{"name":"Norsk Filosofisk Tidsskrift","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46195850","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：