Abstract Objective The objective of this study was to explore the clinical characteristics and management of sudden hearing loss (HL) during pregnancy, thus better guiding the clinical practice. Methods The clinical and follow‐up data of 17 patients (17 ears) with sudden HL during pregnancy were analyzed retrospectively (the observe group). Twelve nonpregnant female patients (12 ears) with sudden HL of similar clinical characteristics were selected as the control group. The prognosis of the two groups was compared. All the patients were followed up after delivery, and two of them were readmitted to the hospital 1–2 months after delivery. Results The observe group had better improvement in hearing and a higher response rate compared to the control group. The pure tone hearing and speech recognition rate of patients could still be improved after the readmitted treatment, and the hearing could partially recover spontaneously during follow‐up. The laboratory indicators that affect the inflammatory response and coagulation pathway were significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions The hearing condition of sudden HL during pregnancy is severe, and the prognosis of these patients is better than nonpregnant patients of similar clinical characteristics. Postpartum treatment is still effective, and some patients showed self‐healing with time during follow‐up. The inflammatory response and coagulation function may affect the hearing of patients through a metabolic pathway.
{"title":"Clinical characteristics of sudden hearing loss during pregnancy","authors":"Xiao‐Nan Wu, Hong‐Yang Wang, Xiao‐Long Zhang, Guo‐Hui Chen, Jing Guan, Yun Gao, Da‐Yong Wang, Qiu‐Ju Wang","doi":"10.1002/wjo2.135","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.135","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective The objective of this study was to explore the clinical characteristics and management of sudden hearing loss (HL) during pregnancy, thus better guiding the clinical practice. Methods The clinical and follow‐up data of 17 patients (17 ears) with sudden HL during pregnancy were analyzed retrospectively (the observe group). Twelve nonpregnant female patients (12 ears) with sudden HL of similar clinical characteristics were selected as the control group. The prognosis of the two groups was compared. All the patients were followed up after delivery, and two of them were readmitted to the hospital 1–2 months after delivery. Results The observe group had better improvement in hearing and a higher response rate compared to the control group. The pure tone hearing and speech recognition rate of patients could still be improved after the readmitted treatment, and the hearing could partially recover spontaneously during follow‐up. The laboratory indicators that affect the inflammatory response and coagulation pathway were significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions The hearing condition of sudden HL during pregnancy is severe, and the prognosis of these patients is better than nonpregnant patients of similar clinical characteristics. Postpartum treatment is still effective, and some patients showed self‐healing with time during follow‐up. The inflammatory response and coagulation function may affect the hearing of patients through a metabolic pathway.","PeriodicalId":32097,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135251584","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Constantin Manole, Liam J. Skinner, Martin J. Donnelly
Abstract Background Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) on the auricle is believed to carry a higher risk of metastatic spread. The rates of lymphatic metastasis reported in the literature have varied widely. There are no established prognostic criteria to determine which of these tumors are higher risk and warrant prophylactic treatment of the associated lymphatic basins. Objective To retrospectively evaluate outcomes after surgical treatment of auricular CSCC in our department, examining excision completeness, tumor recurrence, and lymphatic metastasis. Secondarily, to identify factors associated with lymphatic metastasis. Methods One hundred and thirty‐eight consecutive cases of auricular SCC were excised from 126 patients in our department over a 7‐year period (January 2012–December 2018). Data were retrospectively collected on patient characteristics, tumor histology, surgical procedures, and follow‐up. Results Incomplete initial excision occurred in 17 cases (12.32%). Six patients (4.76%) had a local recurrence. Lymphatic metastasis occurred in eight patients (6.35%), on average within 10.25 months after primary excision. Six patients with metastasis died during follow‐up, with a mean survival of 10.2 months. Older age was associated with lymphatic metastasis ( P = 0.0267). Other factors, including tumor recurrence, size, grade, cartilage invasion, and positive margins, were evaluated and not significantly associated with metastasis. Conclusion In this study, the metastatic rate of auricular SCC was 6.35%, which is within the previously reported ranges. No histological prognostic factors were identified in this study, which may be due to our limited sample size. In the absence of established prognostic criteria, decisions regarding prophylactic treatment should be made on an individual basis with multidisciplinary support.
{"title":"Surgical outcomes for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the auricle","authors":"Constantin Manole, Liam J. Skinner, Martin J. Donnelly","doi":"10.1002/wjo2.137","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.137","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) on the auricle is believed to carry a higher risk of metastatic spread. The rates of lymphatic metastasis reported in the literature have varied widely. There are no established prognostic criteria to determine which of these tumors are higher risk and warrant prophylactic treatment of the associated lymphatic basins. Objective To retrospectively evaluate outcomes after surgical treatment of auricular CSCC in our department, examining excision completeness, tumor recurrence, and lymphatic metastasis. Secondarily, to identify factors associated with lymphatic metastasis. Methods One hundred and thirty‐eight consecutive cases of auricular SCC were excised from 126 patients in our department over a 7‐year period (January 2012–December 2018). Data were retrospectively collected on patient characteristics, tumor histology, surgical procedures, and follow‐up. Results Incomplete initial excision occurred in 17 cases (12.32%). Six patients (4.76%) had a local recurrence. Lymphatic metastasis occurred in eight patients (6.35%), on average within 10.25 months after primary excision. Six patients with metastasis died during follow‐up, with a mean survival of 10.2 months. Older age was associated with lymphatic metastasis ( P = 0.0267). Other factors, including tumor recurrence, size, grade, cartilage invasion, and positive margins, were evaluated and not significantly associated with metastasis. Conclusion In this study, the metastatic rate of auricular SCC was 6.35%, which is within the previously reported ranges. No histological prognostic factors were identified in this study, which may be due to our limited sample size. In the absence of established prognostic criteria, decisions regarding prophylactic treatment should be made on an individual basis with multidisciplinary support.","PeriodicalId":32097,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135198816","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-29eCollection Date: 2023-09-01DOI: 10.1002/wjo2.140
{"title":"Author Guidelines.","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/wjo2.140","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.140","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":32097,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery","volume":"9 3","pages":"262-269"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10541162/pdf/WJO2-9-262.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41150573","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-29eCollection Date: 2023-09-01DOI: 10.1002/wjo2.136
Christopher R Razavi, Tom Wang
{"title":"Introduction to office-based procedures in facial plastic & reconstructive surgery.","authors":"Christopher R Razavi, Tom Wang","doi":"10.1002/wjo2.136","DOIUrl":"10.1002/wjo2.136","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":32097,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery","volume":"9 3","pages":"199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4a/f5/WJO2-9-199.PMC10541168.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41171779","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Radiation‐induced rhinosinusitis is a vital dose‐limiting reaction in patients with head and neck malignancy. Unlike oral mucositis during or after radiotherapy, radiation‐induced sinusitis is easily overlooked in clinical practice and rarely included in experimental studies. Herein, we review the literature to date on radiation‐induced rhinosinusitis.Relevant studies published between 1995 and 2022 were determined through a detailed search using open keywords from PubMed, with manual search of the reference list of the identified articles. Keywords searched were “ionizing radiation,” “radiotherapy,” “intensity‐modulated radiotherapy,” “head and neck tumor,” “nasopharyngeal carcinoma,” “nasal epithelium,” “radiation damage,” and “radiation‐induced rhinosinusitis.” Full‐text articles that clearly stated the pathogenesis, clinical manifestation, predictors, treatment, and prognosis of radiation‐induced rhinosinusitis were included.Radiation‐induced rhinosinusitis occurs during radiotherapy and can last for months or even years after radiotherapy. A mixture of cellular outcomes caused by ionizing radiation and persistent damage of the epithelial and submucosal tissues after the treatment result from the radiotherapy itself. Endoscopic sinus surgery improves symptoms but can be accompanied by intraoperative and postoperative complications. Nasal irrigation, steroids, and antibiotics appear to reduce inflammation and relieve symptoms to a certain extent. Studies on other potentially useful drugs are underway and in the exploration stage, without clinical application.Despite its high incidence, radiation‐induced rhinosinusitis is a type of dose‐limiting toxicity that theoretically does not produce fatal effects at controlled doses and with adequate follow‐up care. In moderate‐to‐severe cases, toxicity may be present. Currently, radiation‐induced rhinosinusitis has potential prevention and treatment strategies. However, no unified management protocol has shown significant improvement in radiation‐induced rhinosinusitis. Further research is necessary.
{"title":"Radiation‐induced rhinosinusitis: Mechanism research and clinical progress review","authors":"Chunge Zheng, Longgang Yu, Yan Jiang","doi":"10.1002/wjo2.134","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.134","url":null,"abstract":"Radiation‐induced rhinosinusitis is a vital dose‐limiting reaction in patients with head and neck malignancy. Unlike oral mucositis during or after radiotherapy, radiation‐induced sinusitis is easily overlooked in clinical practice and rarely included in experimental studies. Herein, we review the literature to date on radiation‐induced rhinosinusitis.Relevant studies published between 1995 and 2022 were determined through a detailed search using open keywords from PubMed, with manual search of the reference list of the identified articles. Keywords searched were “ionizing radiation,” “radiotherapy,” “intensity‐modulated radiotherapy,” “head and neck tumor,” “nasopharyngeal carcinoma,” “nasal epithelium,” “radiation damage,” and “radiation‐induced rhinosinusitis.” Full‐text articles that clearly stated the pathogenesis, clinical manifestation, predictors, treatment, and prognosis of radiation‐induced rhinosinusitis were included.Radiation‐induced rhinosinusitis occurs during radiotherapy and can last for months or even years after radiotherapy. A mixture of cellular outcomes caused by ionizing radiation and persistent damage of the epithelial and submucosal tissues after the treatment result from the radiotherapy itself. Endoscopic sinus surgery improves symptoms but can be accompanied by intraoperative and postoperative complications. Nasal irrigation, steroids, and antibiotics appear to reduce inflammation and relieve symptoms to a certain extent. Studies on other potentially useful drugs are underway and in the exploration stage, without clinical application.Despite its high incidence, radiation‐induced rhinosinusitis is a type of dose‐limiting toxicity that theoretically does not produce fatal effects at controlled doses and with adequate follow‐up care. In moderate‐to‐severe cases, toxicity may be present. Currently, radiation‐induced rhinosinusitis has potential prevention and treatment strategies. However, no unified management protocol has shown significant improvement in radiation‐induced rhinosinusitis. Further research is necessary.","PeriodicalId":32097,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88128747","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck SurgeryVolume 9, Issue 3 p. 270-270 MEMBER LIST OF THE SECOND EDITORIAL BOARD OF WORLD JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERYOpen Access Member List of the Second Editorial Board of World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery First published: 29 September 2023 https://doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.141AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. Volume9, Issue3Special Issue: Facial Plastic and Reconstructive SurgerySeptember 2023Pages 270-270 RelatedInformation
《世界耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志》第9卷第3期第270-270页《世界耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志》第二编委会成员名单《世界耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志》第二编委会开放获取成员名单2023年9月29日https://doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.141AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare全文accessShare全文accessShare请查看我们的使用条款和条件,并勾选下面的复选框共享文章的全文版本。我已经阅读并接受了Wiley在线图书馆使用共享链接的条款和条件,请使用下面的链接与您的朋友和同事分享本文的全文版本。学习更多的知识。复制URL共享链接共享一个emailfacebooktwitterlinkedinreddit微信本文无摘要第9卷,第3期特刊:面部整形和重建手术,九月2023页270-270相关信息
{"title":"Member List of the Second Editorial Board of World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/wjo2.141","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.141","url":null,"abstract":"World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck SurgeryVolume 9, Issue 3 p. 270-270 MEMBER LIST OF THE SECOND EDITORIAL BOARD OF WORLD JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERYOpen Access Member List of the Second Editorial Board of World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery First published: 29 September 2023 https://doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.141AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. Volume9, Issue3Special Issue: Facial Plastic and Reconstructive SurgerySeptember 2023Pages 270-270 RelatedInformation","PeriodicalId":32097,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135588234","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-28eCollection Date: 2023-09-01DOI: 10.1002/wjo2.131
Suhas Bharadwaj, William Dougherty
Objective: The objective of this study is to provide a state-of-the-art review on the use of anesthetics for in-office facial plastic procedures.
Methods: A search was performed on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Review using the keywords "anesthesia," "office-based procedures," "local anesthesia," "facial plastics," "oral sedation," "moderate sedation," and "deep sedation."
Results and conclusions: Over the past few decades, the shift toward in-office invasive procedures has increased patient convenience and decreased hospital resource utilization. Many tools exist to reduce patient anxiety and discomfort in an office-based setting. With proper patient selection and technique, facial plastic surgeons can adequately anesthetize patients to perform Mohs reconstruction, cutaneous excisions, blepharoplasty, face-lifts, and other in-office procedures.
目的:本研究的目的是对麻醉剂在办公室面部整形手术中的应用进行最新的综述。方法:在PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane Review上使用关键词“麻醉”、“基于办公室的程序”、“局部麻醉”、”面部整形“、”口腔镇静“、”中度镇静“和”深度镇静“进行搜索。结果和结论:在过去的几十年里,向办公室侵入性手术的转变增加了患者的便利性,降低了医院资源的利用率。在办公室环境中,有许多工具可以减少患者的焦虑和不适。通过适当的患者选择和技术,面部整形外科医生可以充分麻醉患者进行莫氏重建、皮肤切除、眼睑整形、面部提拉和其他办公室手术。
{"title":"Anesthesia for office-based facial plastic surgery procedures.","authors":"Suhas Bharadwaj, William Dougherty","doi":"10.1002/wjo2.131","DOIUrl":"10.1002/wjo2.131","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to provide a state-of-the-art review on the use of anesthetics for in-office facial plastic procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search was performed on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Review using the keywords \"anesthesia,\" \"office-based procedures,\" \"local anesthesia,\" \"facial plastics,\" \"oral sedation,\" \"moderate sedation,\" and \"deep sedation.\"</p><p><strong>Results and conclusions: </strong>Over the past few decades, the shift toward in-office invasive procedures has increased patient convenience and decreased hospital resource utilization. Many tools exist to reduce patient anxiety and discomfort in an office-based setting. With proper patient selection and technique, facial plastic surgeons can adequately anesthetize patients to perform Mohs reconstruction, cutaneous excisions, blepharoplasty, face-lifts, and other in-office procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":32097,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery","volume":"9 3","pages":"200-205"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/82/4a/WJO2-9-200.PMC10541158.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41178543","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
A. Alhassan, Mahadi Iddrisu, Nurudeen Abdul‐Karim, R. Iddrisu, M. A. Baba
This present study investigated the prevalence, characteristics, and management of ear, nose, and throat (ENT) foreign body (FB) in the pediatric population of Tamale.Retrospective observational study for otorhinolaryngology surgeries from 2019 to 2022 for children aged 17 years and below at Tamale Teaching Hospital.A checklist created was used to collect data from the Otorhinolaryngology Surgeries records from 2019 to 2022. Chi‐square and binary logistics regression analysis were done for associations. The level of statistical significance was set at 0.05.Two hundred and sixty‐three cases were included in this study, and the mean age of the study participants was (4.3 ± 3.8) years with a minimum age of 1 month and a maximum age of 17 years. Most (65.4%) of the study participants were under‐5 years. The prevalence of FB in this study was 47.9%. The majority (54.8%) of the ENT FB incidence was through ingestion. Almost half (50.8%) of the ENT FB was removed through esophagoscopy. Among the foreign bodies, the coin was the most common (44.5%). Those less than 1 year were more likely to encounter FB than those 12 years and above (adust odds ratio [AOR] = 27.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.7–164.6). Again, those of 5 to less than 12 years were more likely to encounter ENT FB than those 12 years and above (AOR = 5.7, 95% CI = 1.2–26.3).Foreign bodies are a common occurrence in pediatric otorhinolaryngology surgeries in Tamale Teaching Hospital. Younger children are more likely to report for otorhinolaryngology surgeries for FB in Tamale Teaching Hospital.
{"title":"Pediatric otorhinolaryngology surgeries for foreign bodies: A retrospective observational study in Tamale Teaching Hospital","authors":"A. Alhassan, Mahadi Iddrisu, Nurudeen Abdul‐Karim, R. Iddrisu, M. A. Baba","doi":"10.1002/wjo2.130","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.130","url":null,"abstract":"This present study investigated the prevalence, characteristics, and management of ear, nose, and throat (ENT) foreign body (FB) in the pediatric population of Tamale.Retrospective observational study for otorhinolaryngology surgeries from 2019 to 2022 for children aged 17 years and below at Tamale Teaching Hospital.A checklist created was used to collect data from the Otorhinolaryngology Surgeries records from 2019 to 2022. Chi‐square and binary logistics regression analysis were done for associations. The level of statistical significance was set at 0.05.Two hundred and sixty‐three cases were included in this study, and the mean age of the study participants was (4.3 ± 3.8) years with a minimum age of 1 month and a maximum age of 17 years. Most (65.4%) of the study participants were under‐5 years. The prevalence of FB in this study was 47.9%. The majority (54.8%) of the ENT FB incidence was through ingestion. Almost half (50.8%) of the ENT FB was removed through esophagoscopy. Among the foreign bodies, the coin was the most common (44.5%). Those less than 1 year were more likely to encounter FB than those 12 years and above (adust odds ratio [AOR] = 27.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.7–164.6). Again, those of 5 to less than 12 years were more likely to encounter ENT FB than those 12 years and above (AOR = 5.7, 95% CI = 1.2–26.3).Foreign bodies are a common occurrence in pediatric otorhinolaryngology surgeries in Tamale Teaching Hospital. Younger children are more likely to report for otorhinolaryngology surgeries for FB in Tamale Teaching Hospital.","PeriodicalId":32097,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery","volume":"7 12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88619246","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ahab Alnemri, Kaley Ricciardelli, Stephanie Wang, Michael Baumgartner, Tiffany N. Chao
Abstract Objective Tracheostomy is often performed in patients with a prolonged course of endotracheal intubation. This study sought to examine the clinical utility of tracheostomy during severe Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) infection. Study Design A retrospective single‐system, multicenter observational cohort study was performed on patients intubated for COVID‐19 infection. Patients who received intubation alone were compared with patients who received intubation and subsequent tracheostomy. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and hospital courses were analyzed. Setting The University of Pennsylvania Health System from 2020 to 2021. Methods Logistic regression analysis was performed on patient demographics and comorbidities. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were generated depending on whether patients received a tracheostomy. Results Of 777 intubated patients, 452 were male (58.2%) and 325 were female (41.8%) with a median age of 63 (interquartile range [IQR]: 54–73) years. One‐hundred and eighty‐five (23.8%) patients underwent tracheostomy. The mean time from intubation to tracheostomy was (17.3 ± 9.7) days. Patients who underwent tracheostomy were less likely to expire during their hospitalization than those who did not undergo tracheostomy (odds ratio [OR] = 0.31, P < 0.001), and patient age was positively associated with mortality (OR = 1.04 per year, P < 0.001). Likelihood of receiving tracheostomy was positively associated with being on extra‐corporeal membranous oxygenation (ECMO) (OR = 101.10, P < 0.001), immunocompromised status (OR = 3.61, P = 0.002), and current tobacco smoking (OR = 4.81, P = 0.041). Tracheostomy was also associated with a significantly longer hospital length of stay ([57.5 ± 32.2] days vs. [19.9 ± 18.1] days, P < 0.001). Conclusions Tracheostomy was associated with reduced in‐hospital mortality, despite also being associated with increased comorbidities. Tracheostomy should not be held back from patients with comorbidities for this reason alone and may even improve survival in high‐risk patients.
摘要目的气管切开术常用于气管插管疗程较长的患者。本研究旨在探讨2019年严重冠状病毒病(COVID - 19)感染期间气管切开术的临床应用。研究设计:一项回顾性单系统、多中心观察队列研究对插管治疗COVID - 19感染的患者进行了研究。将单独插管的患者与插管后气管切开术的患者进行比较。分析患者人口统计、合并症和住院疗程。设定宾夕法尼亚大学卫生系统从2020年到2021年方法对患者人口统计学和合并症进行Logistic回归分析。Kaplan-Meier生存曲线的生成取决于患者是否接受了气管切开术。结果777例插管患者中,男性452例(58.2%),女性325例(41.8%),中位年龄63岁(四分位间距[IQR]: 54 ~ 73)。185例(23.8%)患者接受了气管切开术。从插管到气管切开平均时间为(17.3±9.7)d。接受气管切开术的患者在住院期间死亡的可能性低于未接受气管切开术的患者(优势比[OR] = 0.31, P <0.001),患者年龄与死亡率呈正相关(OR = 1.04 /年,P <0.001)。接受气管切开术的可能性与体外膜氧合(ECMO)呈正相关(OR = 101.10, P <0.001)、免疫功能低下(OR = 3.61, P = 0.002)和当前吸烟(OR = 4.81, P = 0.041)。气管切开术也与住院时间显著延长相关([57.5±32.2]天比[19.9±18.1]天,P <0.001)。结论气管切开术与降低住院死亡率相关,尽管也与增加的合并症相关。气管切开术不应该仅仅因为这个原因而对有合并症的患者进行限制,甚至可以提高高风险患者的生存率。
{"title":"Tracheostomy is associated with decreased in‐hospital mortality during severe COVID‐19 infection","authors":"Ahab Alnemri, Kaley Ricciardelli, Stephanie Wang, Michael Baumgartner, Tiffany N. Chao","doi":"10.1002/wjo2.129","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.129","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective Tracheostomy is often performed in patients with a prolonged course of endotracheal intubation. This study sought to examine the clinical utility of tracheostomy during severe Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) infection. Study Design A retrospective single‐system, multicenter observational cohort study was performed on patients intubated for COVID‐19 infection. Patients who received intubation alone were compared with patients who received intubation and subsequent tracheostomy. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and hospital courses were analyzed. Setting The University of Pennsylvania Health System from 2020 to 2021. Methods Logistic regression analysis was performed on patient demographics and comorbidities. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were generated depending on whether patients received a tracheostomy. Results Of 777 intubated patients, 452 were male (58.2%) and 325 were female (41.8%) with a median age of 63 (interquartile range [IQR]: 54–73) years. One‐hundred and eighty‐five (23.8%) patients underwent tracheostomy. The mean time from intubation to tracheostomy was (17.3 ± 9.7) days. Patients who underwent tracheostomy were less likely to expire during their hospitalization than those who did not undergo tracheostomy (odds ratio [OR] = 0.31, P < 0.001), and patient age was positively associated with mortality (OR = 1.04 per year, P < 0.001). Likelihood of receiving tracheostomy was positively associated with being on extra‐corporeal membranous oxygenation (ECMO) (OR = 101.10, P < 0.001), immunocompromised status (OR = 3.61, P = 0.002), and current tobacco smoking (OR = 4.81, P = 0.041). Tracheostomy was also associated with a significantly longer hospital length of stay ([57.5 ± 32.2] days vs. [19.9 ± 18.1] days, P < 0.001). Conclusions Tracheostomy was associated with reduced in‐hospital mortality, despite also being associated with increased comorbidities. Tracheostomy should not be held back from patients with comorbidities for this reason alone and may even improve survival in high‐risk patients.","PeriodicalId":32097,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery","volume":"277 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135821742","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-18eCollection Date: 2023-09-01DOI: 10.1002/wjo2.120
Arman Saeedi, Danielle F Eytan
Office-based procedures can be a fulfilling part of the facial plastic practice with the right tools, personnel, and preparation. Equipping the clinic for office-based procedures has several unique considerations that ultimately impact its success. It is important to strategize preemptively regarding what treatments will be offered and the respective equipment that will allow the safe, cost-effective, and high-quality delivery of those treatments. Most procedures in the office-based setting are cosmetic in nature and there are often overlapping treatment modalities that target similar outcomes. Patient selection and counseling is a crucial step in preparing for office-based procedures in the effort to maximize patient satisfaction. Nearly all the most common facial plastic procedures can be delivered in the office-based based setting under local anesthesia and moderate sedation, depending on the expertise of the surgeon. To enable these and other categories of treatments, there are certain expensive pieces of technology that one might consider for their office-based practice and other fundamental supplies that are necessary for almost all practices. Though the initial investment in equipment can be costly, this article also discusses more affordable alternatives or third-party sales of devices and equipment. The field of facial plastic surgery is very dynamic and having both peer and mentorship networks is invaluable in navigating some of the financial decisions discussed herein. This article also briefly covers personnel, training, and accreditation considerations.
{"title":"Equipping your facial plastic clinic for office-based procedures.","authors":"Arman Saeedi, Danielle F Eytan","doi":"10.1002/wjo2.120","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.120","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Office-based procedures can be a fulfilling part of the facial plastic practice with the right tools, personnel, and preparation. Equipping the clinic for office-based procedures has several unique considerations that ultimately impact its success. It is important to strategize preemptively regarding what treatments will be offered and the respective equipment that will allow the safe, cost-effective, and high-quality delivery of those treatments. Most procedures in the office-based setting are cosmetic in nature and there are often overlapping treatment modalities that target similar outcomes. Patient selection and counseling is a crucial step in preparing for office-based procedures in the effort to maximize patient satisfaction. Nearly all the most common facial plastic procedures can be delivered in the office-based based setting under local anesthesia and moderate sedation, depending on the expertise of the surgeon. To enable these and other categories of treatments, there are certain expensive pieces of technology that one might consider for their office-based practice and other fundamental supplies that are necessary for almost all practices. Though the initial investment in equipment can be costly, this article also discusses more affordable alternatives or third-party sales of devices and equipment. The field of facial plastic surgery is very dynamic and having both peer and mentorship networks is invaluable in navigating some of the financial decisions discussed herein. This article also briefly covers personnel, training, and accreditation considerations.</p>","PeriodicalId":32097,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery","volume":"9 3","pages":"206-211"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6f/2a/WJO2-9-206.PMC10541166.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41104122","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}