首页 > 最新文献

Indian Journal of Pain最新文献

英文 中文
Intraoperative analgesic requirement using surgical plethysmographic index guidance in lumbar spine surgeries: A comparative study 手术体积描记指数指导下腰椎手术术中镇痛需求的比较研究
Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_42_22
Sujit Kshirsagar, Pallavi Butiyani, Adnanali Sarkar, Geetanjali Dangat, Lisa Prakash, G. Girishkumar, Prathmesh Raut
Context: The surgical plethysmographic index (SPI) has been introduced as a measure of the balance between nociception and anti-nociception. The SPI is proposed for the titration of intraoperative analgesic drugs during general anesthesia. Aims: This study aimed to compare the requirement of intraoperative analgesic consumption between SPI-guided analgesia and conventional analgesia practices, requirement of rescue analgesics and to study recovery time. Subjects and Methods: In this double-blind, randomized control study, 64 patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery were randomly divided into SPI-guided analgesia group (SPI) and conventional practice group (control). In the SPI group, patients received injection fentanyl bolus of 0.5 μg/kg whenever SPI value increased above 50. While in the conventional group, injection fentanyl 0.5 μg/kg was administered according to conventional clinical practice. Statistical Analysis Used: The statistical significance of difference of various categorical variables across two groups was tested using the Chi-square test. For assessing intergroup statistical significance of difference of various continuous measurements, independent sample t-test was used. Results: Intraoperative fentanyl requirement was 119.53 ± 16.48 μg in the conventional group and 142.97 ± 24.78 μg in SPI-guided group (P < 0.05). The difference was statistically significant. The mean recovery time in conventional group was 13.03 ± 1.03 min, and for SPI group, it was 13.53 ± 1.14 min (P > 0.05). Conclusions: We can conclude that SPI guidance may not always help in decreasing the dose of intraoperative opioid consumption. It should be used in combination with hemodynamic parameters. SPI guidance may not affect recovery time.
背景:外科体积描记指数(SPI)已被引入作为伤害性和抗伤害性之间平衡的衡量标准。SPI用于全身麻醉期间术中镇痛药物的滴定。目的:本研究旨在比较SPI引导镇痛与常规镇痛方法对术中镇痛消耗的需求、对抢救性镇痛剂的需求以及研究恢复时间。受试者和方法:在这项双盲、随机对照研究中,64名腰椎手术患者被随机分为SPI指导镇痛组(SPI)和常规镇痛组(对照)。在SPI组中,每当SPI值增加到50以上时,患者就接受0.5μg/kg的芬太尼注射液。而在常规组中,根据常规临床实践,注射芬太尼0.5μg/kg。使用的统计分析:使用卡方检验来检验两组之间各种分类变量差异的统计学意义。为了评估各种连续测量差异的组间统计显著性,使用了独立样本t检验。结果:常规组术中芬太尼需求量为119.53±16.48μg,SPI引导组为142.97±24.78μg,差异有统计学意义。常规组的平均恢复时间为13.03±1.03min,SPI组为13.53±1.14min(P>0.05)。应结合血液动力学参数使用。SPI指导可能不会影响恢复时间。
{"title":"Intraoperative analgesic requirement using surgical plethysmographic index guidance in lumbar spine surgeries: A comparative study","authors":"Sujit Kshirsagar, Pallavi Butiyani, Adnanali Sarkar, Geetanjali Dangat, Lisa Prakash, G. Girishkumar, Prathmesh Raut","doi":"10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_42_22","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_42_22","url":null,"abstract":"Context: The surgical plethysmographic index (SPI) has been introduced as a measure of the balance between nociception and anti-nociception. The SPI is proposed for the titration of intraoperative analgesic drugs during general anesthesia. Aims: This study aimed to compare the requirement of intraoperative analgesic consumption between SPI-guided analgesia and conventional analgesia practices, requirement of rescue analgesics and to study recovery time. Subjects and Methods: In this double-blind, randomized control study, 64 patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery were randomly divided into SPI-guided analgesia group (SPI) and conventional practice group (control). In the SPI group, patients received injection fentanyl bolus of 0.5 μg/kg whenever SPI value increased above 50. While in the conventional group, injection fentanyl 0.5 μg/kg was administered according to conventional clinical practice. Statistical Analysis Used: The statistical significance of difference of various categorical variables across two groups was tested using the Chi-square test. For assessing intergroup statistical significance of difference of various continuous measurements, independent sample t-test was used. Results: Intraoperative fentanyl requirement was 119.53 ± 16.48 μg in the conventional group and 142.97 ± 24.78 μg in SPI-guided group (P < 0.05). The difference was statistically significant. The mean recovery time in conventional group was 13.03 ± 1.03 min, and for SPI group, it was 13.53 ± 1.14 min (P > 0.05). Conclusions: We can conclude that SPI guidance may not always help in decreasing the dose of intraoperative opioid consumption. It should be used in combination with hemodynamic parameters. SPI guidance may not affect recovery time.","PeriodicalId":32328,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Pain","volume":"37 1","pages":"81 - 85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44553271","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Morphological alterations in needle tip following trigger point dry needling 触发点干刺后针尖的形态学变化
Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_49_22
Manoj Sharma, Hardika Sood
{"title":"Morphological alterations in needle tip following trigger point dry needling","authors":"Manoj Sharma, Hardika Sood","doi":"10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_49_22","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_49_22","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":32328,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Pain","volume":"37 1","pages":"134 - 135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44877668","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Unveiling the power of perception: The placebo and nocebo effects in pain medicine research 揭示感知的力量:疼痛药物研究中的安慰剂和反安慰剂效应
Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_59_23
Prateek Arora, Samarjit Dey
{"title":"Unveiling the power of perception: The placebo and nocebo effects in pain medicine research","authors":"Prateek Arora, Samarjit Dey","doi":"10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_59_23","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_59_23","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":32328,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Pain","volume":"37 1","pages":"63 - 64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44698575","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Management of linezolid-induced peripheral neuropathy 利奈唑胺所致周围神经病变的治疗
Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_115_22
Rituja Tambe, Preeti P Doshi
As the incidence of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis is increasing, more cases of linezolid-induced peripheral neuropathy are being noted. It is challenging to treat. In this case report, we describe the successful management of this painful neuropathy using a multimodal multidisciplinary approach.
随着广泛耐药结核病的发病率不断增加,越来越多的利奈唑胺诱导的周围神经病变病例被注意到。治疗起来很有挑战性。在本病例报告中,我们描述了使用多模式多学科方法成功治疗这种疼痛性神经病的情况。
{"title":"Management of linezolid-induced peripheral neuropathy","authors":"Rituja Tambe, Preeti P Doshi","doi":"10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_115_22","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_115_22","url":null,"abstract":"As the incidence of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis is increasing, more cases of linezolid-induced peripheral neuropathy are being noted. It is challenging to treat. In this case report, we describe the successful management of this painful neuropathy using a multimodal multidisciplinary approach.","PeriodicalId":32328,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Pain","volume":"37 1","pages":"120 - 122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42896712","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Redefining the role of analgesic adjuvants in pain management: A narrative review 重新定义止痛佐剂在疼痛管理中的作用:叙述回顾
Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_23_22
Arinze George Nwosu, L. Chukwu, O. Onwuasoigwe, S. Nweze, Kenneth I. Nwadike
Conventional analgesics have traditionally been the mainstay of pain management, but unsatisfactory pain relief and troubling side effects have led to continuing search for more efficacious and safer remedies. Adjuvant analgesics are drugs with beneficial analgesic effects despite not having been developed as analgesics. Adjuvants facilitate better pain control with a reduction in analgesic consumption, as well as the concomitant side effects. The opioid epidemic, deaths from opioid overdose, and several other complications of opioid-based analgesia have led to increasing interrogation of its use in both acute and chronic pain settings. The current trends in surgical practice, especially ambulatory surgery and enhanced recovery after surgery/fast-track care pathways have profoundly impacted the choices for acute pain management, with an increasing role for adjuvants. Medicinal cannabis and other adjuvants have also become increasingly popular for the management of intractable chronic pain and neuropathic pain owing to the inadequacy of conventional analgesics in these pain states. As clinical and research interest in patient safety and patient satisfaction evolve further development of adjuvant analgesics will be expected to fill the existing gaps in pain management. This review aims to examine the expanding role of analgesic adjuvants in the management of acute and chronic pains, and in the prevention of the transition to chronic pain. In doing so, we conducted an online search primarily on the PUBMED database using the term “analgesic adjuvant” for human studies published in peer-reviewed journals from 2000 to 2022.
传统的镇痛药一直是治疗疼痛的主要方法,但令人不满意的疼痛缓解和令人不安的副作用促使人们继续寻找更有效、更安全的治疗方法。辅助镇痛药是一种具有有益镇痛作用的药物,尽管尚未发展成为镇痛药。佐剂有助于更好地控制疼痛,减少止痛药的消耗,以及伴随的副作用。阿片类药物的流行、阿片类药物过量导致的死亡以及阿片类药物镇痛的其他几种并发症导致人们越来越多地质疑其在急性和慢性疼痛情况下的使用。当前外科实践的趋势,特别是门诊手术和术后增强恢复/快速通道护理路径深刻地影响了急性疼痛管理的选择,佐剂的作用越来越大。药用大麻和其他佐剂也越来越受欢迎的难治性慢性疼痛和神经性疼痛的管理,由于在这些疼痛状态的传统镇痛药的不足。随着临床和研究对患者安全和患者满意度的兴趣不断发展,辅助镇痛药的进一步开发将有望填补疼痛管理方面的现有空白。这篇综述的目的是研究镇痛佐剂在急性和慢性疼痛管理中的作用,以及在过渡到慢性疼痛的预防。在此过程中,我们主要在PUBMED数据库中使用“镇痛辅助剂”一词对2000年至2022年在同行评审期刊上发表的人类研究进行了在线搜索。
{"title":"Redefining the role of analgesic adjuvants in pain management: A narrative review","authors":"Arinze George Nwosu, L. Chukwu, O. Onwuasoigwe, S. Nweze, Kenneth I. Nwadike","doi":"10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_23_22","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_23_22","url":null,"abstract":"Conventional analgesics have traditionally been the mainstay of pain management, but unsatisfactory pain relief and troubling side effects have led to continuing search for more efficacious and safer remedies. Adjuvant analgesics are drugs with beneficial analgesic effects despite not having been developed as analgesics. Adjuvants facilitate better pain control with a reduction in analgesic consumption, as well as the concomitant side effects. The opioid epidemic, deaths from opioid overdose, and several other complications of opioid-based analgesia have led to increasing interrogation of its use in both acute and chronic pain settings. The current trends in surgical practice, especially ambulatory surgery and enhanced recovery after surgery/fast-track care pathways have profoundly impacted the choices for acute pain management, with an increasing role for adjuvants. Medicinal cannabis and other adjuvants have also become increasingly popular for the management of intractable chronic pain and neuropathic pain owing to the inadequacy of conventional analgesics in these pain states. As clinical and research interest in patient safety and patient satisfaction evolve further development of adjuvant analgesics will be expected to fill the existing gaps in pain management. This review aims to examine the expanding role of analgesic adjuvants in the management of acute and chronic pains, and in the prevention of the transition to chronic pain. In doing so, we conducted an online search primarily on the PUBMED database using the term “analgesic adjuvant” for human studies published in peer-reviewed journals from 2000 to 2022.","PeriodicalId":32328,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Pain","volume":"37 1","pages":"65 - 73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"70764341","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Subcutaneous platelet rich plasma therapy for management of hyperalgesia in complex regional pain syndrome 皮下富血小板血浆治疗复杂局部疼痛综合征的痛觉过敏
Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_93_22
Aradhana Rout, Kamparsh Thakur, A. Choubey
Objectives: Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), which usually develops after a traumatic event, often has a debilitating effect on the quality of life. Treatment is multidisciplinary and is based primarily on pain relief. Due to the symptoms of hyperalgesia and allodynia in patients with CRPS, dermatology opinion is often seeked. CRPS is a difficult disorder to treat and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a potential treatment modality for pain relief in this debilitating illness. We aimed to investigate the role of subcutaneous PRP for relief of hyperalgesia in patients with CRPS. Materials and Methods: A comparative prospective study of 15 male patients with CRPS diagnosed clinically by the Budapest criteria and radiologically by magnetic resonance imaging was enrolled for the study. PRP was injected subcutaneously at biweekly interval for 8 weeks and the results were assessed clinically by neuropathic pain score (NPS) score. The patient satisfaction was noted at baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks. Patients were followed up for 3 months to assess the increase or decrease in hyperalgesia after stopping PRP. ANOVA was used with the Bonferroni correction for NPS score at various time interval. P ≤ 0.05 is considered statistically significant. Results: Numeric Rating Scale score showed statistically significant improvement at end of the study as compared to the baseline. Patients also had improvement in range of motion which was assessed at every visit. A few patients had mild redness and burning postprocedure which resolved spontaneously after a few hours. Conclusions: From this study, we concluded that subcutaneous PRP shows a significant reduction of hyperalgesia associated with CRPS.
目的:复杂区域疼痛综合征(CRPS)通常在创伤事件后发展,通常会对生活质量产生削弱作用。治疗是多学科的,主要基于疼痛缓解。由于CRPS患者的痛觉过敏和异常性疼痛症状,皮肤科的意见经常被征求。CRPS是一种难以治疗的疾病,富含血小板的血浆(PRP)是缓解这种衰弱性疾病疼痛的潜在治疗方式。我们旨在研究皮下PRP在缓解CRPS患者痛觉过敏中的作用。材料和方法:本研究纳入了15名男性CRPS患者的前瞻性比较研究,这些患者通过布达佩斯标准进行临床诊断,并通过磁共振成像进行放射学诊断。PRP以每两周一次的间隔皮下注射8周,并通过神经病理性疼痛评分(NPS)评分对结果进行临床评估。在基线、4周和8周时记录患者满意度。对患者进行3个月的随访,以评估停止PRP后痛觉过敏的增加或减少。ANOVA和Bonferroni校正用于不同时间间隔的NPS评分。P≤0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果:与基线相比,数值评定量表评分在研究结束时显示出统计学上的显著改善。患者的活动范围也有所改善,这在每次就诊时都进行了评估。少数患者术后出现轻度发红和灼热,数小时后症状自行缓解。结论:从这项研究中,我们得出结论,皮下PRP显示出与CRPS相关的痛觉过敏显著减少。
{"title":"Subcutaneous platelet rich plasma therapy for management of hyperalgesia in complex regional pain syndrome","authors":"Aradhana Rout, Kamparsh Thakur, A. Choubey","doi":"10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_93_22","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_93_22","url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), which usually develops after a traumatic event, often has a debilitating effect on the quality of life. Treatment is multidisciplinary and is based primarily on pain relief. Due to the symptoms of hyperalgesia and allodynia in patients with CRPS, dermatology opinion is often seeked. CRPS is a difficult disorder to treat and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a potential treatment modality for pain relief in this debilitating illness. We aimed to investigate the role of subcutaneous PRP for relief of hyperalgesia in patients with CRPS. Materials and Methods: A comparative prospective study of 15 male patients with CRPS diagnosed clinically by the Budapest criteria and radiologically by magnetic resonance imaging was enrolled for the study. PRP was injected subcutaneously at biweekly interval for 8 weeks and the results were assessed clinically by neuropathic pain score (NPS) score. The patient satisfaction was noted at baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks. Patients were followed up for 3 months to assess the increase or decrease in hyperalgesia after stopping PRP. ANOVA was used with the Bonferroni correction for NPS score at various time interval. P ≤ 0.05 is considered statistically significant. Results: Numeric Rating Scale score showed statistically significant improvement at end of the study as compared to the baseline. Patients also had improvement in range of motion which was assessed at every visit. A few patients had mild redness and burning postprocedure which resolved spontaneously after a few hours. Conclusions: From this study, we concluded that subcutaneous PRP shows a significant reduction of hyperalgesia associated with CRPS.","PeriodicalId":32328,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Pain","volume":"37 1","pages":"106 - 109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42269902","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
A comparative study of analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block versus landmark-guided thoracic paravertebral block for modified radical mastectomy under general anesthesia 超声引导下锯肌前平面阻滞与胸椎旁阻滞在改良乳房根治术中镇痛效果的比较研究
Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_36_22
Manshi Gandhi, Chiranjib Bhattacharyya, Soumik Mazumder, Basanta Gandhi
Background: Postoperative pain is a common sequel of modified radical mastectomy (MRM) and, when left unrelieved may progress to chronic pain syndrome known as persistent pain after breast cancer surgery. With increased breast cancer survival seen in recent years, it has become increasingly important to recognize and implement the best modalities of pain-relieving treatment. Aims: The aim of the study was to compare the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound (US)-guided serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) and conventional anatomical landmark-guided thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) for MRM in terms of time to first request for rescue analgesia and other associated characteristics in terms of time taken to perform both blocks (in minutes), intraoperative fentanyl consumption, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score and morphine consumption on the 1st postoperative day, intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamics (heart rate and mean arterial pressure), and complications of either block techniques. Settings and Design: This study was conducted at a single-center tertiary care hospital in the form of parallel-group randomized controlled trial (RCT), which was based on computer-generated randomization. Materials and Methods: This RCT was conducted on 78 adult females posted for MRM. After intubation, patients were administered a single-shot injection of either TPVB at T4 (Group T, n = 39) or SAPB between the 4th and 5th ribs (Group S, n = 39) with 20 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine. Time to first rescue analgesic, morphine consumption in patient-controlled analgesia pump, VAS score, intraoperative hemodynamics, and adverse effects were recorded. Statistical Analyses: All raw data were entered into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and analyzed using the appropriate statistical methods using SPSS (version 27.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Data were expressed in mean ± standard deviation (SD), and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data were summarized by routine descriptive statistics, namely mean and SD for numerical variables that are normally distributed, the median and interquartile range for skewed numerical variables, and counts and percentages for the categorical variables. Numerical variables were compared between the groups by Student's independent sample t-test, when normally distributed and by Mann–Whitney U-test when skewed. Results: The duration of analgesia was significantly longer in the TPVB group as compared to the SAPB group (7.77 ± 1.317 h vs. 6.59 ± 1.174 h, P < 0.05). The postoperative 24 h morphine consumption (mean ± SD) was also significantly higher in the SAPB group as compared to the TPVB group (7.03 ± 1.135 mg vs. 5.74 ± 1.21 mg, P < 0.05). Conclusion: Preincisional conventional anatomical landmark-guided TPVB is significantly superior to preincisional US-guided SAPB in terms of duration of analgesia and overall morphine consumption in post-MRM patients.
背景:术后疼痛是改良根治性乳房切除术(MRM)的常见后遗症,如果不缓解,可能会在乳腺癌手术后发展为慢性疼痛综合征,即持续性疼痛。随着近年来乳腺癌生存率的提高,认识和实施最佳的镇痛治疗方式变得越来越重要。目的:本研究的目的是比较超声(US)引导下锯肌前平面阻滞(SAPB)和传统解剖标志引导下胸椎旁阻滞(TPVB)在MRM中首次请求抢救镇痛的时间和其他相关特征,包括两种阻滞所需的时间(以分钟为单位)、术中芬太尼用量、视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分和术后第一天吗啡用量。术中和术后血流动力学(心率和平均动脉压),以及两种阻滞技术的并发症。环境与设计:本研究在单中心三级医院进行,采用平行组随机对照试验(RCT)的形式,基于计算机生成随机化。材料与方法:本随机对照试验对78名成年女性进行磁共振成像。插管后,患者在T4处(T组,n = 39)或在第4和第5肋骨之间(S组,n = 39)单次注射TPVB和0.5%布比卡因20 ml。记录首次抢救镇痛时间、患者自控镇痛泵吗啡用量、VAS评分、术中血流动力学及不良反应。统计分析:所有原始数据输入到Microsoft Excel电子表格中,使用SPSS(27.0版本;SPSS Inc.,芝加哥,伊利诺伊州,美国)。数据以均数±标准差(SD)表示,以P < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。采用常规描述性统计方法对数据进行汇总,即正态分布的数值变量的均值和SD,偏态分布的数值变量的中位数和四分位数范围,分类变量的计数和百分比。正态分布时采用学生独立样本t检验,偏态分布时采用Mann-Whitney u检验。结果:TPVB组镇痛时间明显长于SAPB组(7.77±1.317 h∶6.59±1.174 h, P < 0.05)。SAPB组术后24 h吗啡用量(平均±SD)显著高于TPVB组(7.03±1.135 mg vs. 5.74±1.21 mg, P < 0.05)。结论:在mrm后患者中,术前常规解剖标志引导下的TPVB在镇痛持续时间和吗啡总用量方面明显优于术前us引导下的SAPB。
{"title":"A comparative study of analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block versus landmark-guided thoracic paravertebral block for modified radical mastectomy under general anesthesia","authors":"Manshi Gandhi, Chiranjib Bhattacharyya, Soumik Mazumder, Basanta Gandhi","doi":"10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_36_22","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_36_22","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Postoperative pain is a common sequel of modified radical mastectomy (MRM) and, when left unrelieved may progress to chronic pain syndrome known as persistent pain after breast cancer surgery. With increased breast cancer survival seen in recent years, it has become increasingly important to recognize and implement the best modalities of pain-relieving treatment. Aims: The aim of the study was to compare the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound (US)-guided serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) and conventional anatomical landmark-guided thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) for MRM in terms of time to first request for rescue analgesia and other associated characteristics in terms of time taken to perform both blocks (in minutes), intraoperative fentanyl consumption, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score and morphine consumption on the 1st postoperative day, intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamics (heart rate and mean arterial pressure), and complications of either block techniques. Settings and Design: This study was conducted at a single-center tertiary care hospital in the form of parallel-group randomized controlled trial (RCT), which was based on computer-generated randomization. Materials and Methods: This RCT was conducted on 78 adult females posted for MRM. After intubation, patients were administered a single-shot injection of either TPVB at T4 (Group T, n = 39) or SAPB between the 4th and 5th ribs (Group S, n = 39) with 20 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine. Time to first rescue analgesic, morphine consumption in patient-controlled analgesia pump, VAS score, intraoperative hemodynamics, and adverse effects were recorded. Statistical Analyses: All raw data were entered into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and analyzed using the appropriate statistical methods using SPSS (version 27.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Data were expressed in mean ± standard deviation (SD), and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data were summarized by routine descriptive statistics, namely mean and SD for numerical variables that are normally distributed, the median and interquartile range for skewed numerical variables, and counts and percentages for the categorical variables. Numerical variables were compared between the groups by Student's independent sample t-test, when normally distributed and by Mann–Whitney U-test when skewed. Results: The duration of analgesia was significantly longer in the TPVB group as compared to the SAPB group (7.77 ± 1.317 h vs. 6.59 ± 1.174 h, P < 0.05). The postoperative 24 h morphine consumption (mean ± SD) was also significantly higher in the SAPB group as compared to the TPVB group (7.03 ± 1.135 mg vs. 5.74 ± 1.21 mg, P < 0.05). Conclusion: Preincisional conventional anatomical landmark-guided TPVB is significantly superior to preincisional US-guided SAPB in terms of duration of analgesia and overall morphine consumption in post-MRM patients.","PeriodicalId":32328,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Pain","volume":"37 1","pages":"34 - 40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41807163","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pilot study: Dipping your toe into the water 试点研究:将脚趾浸入水中
Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_15_23
Indubala Maurya, A. Lohiya
{"title":"Pilot study: Dipping your toe into the water","authors":"Indubala Maurya, A. Lohiya","doi":"10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_15_23","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_15_23","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":32328,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Pain","volume":"37 1","pages":"1 - 2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45104133","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Percutaneous balloon compression of the trigeminal ganglion for refractory short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache with conjunctival redness and tearing syndrome 经皮球囊压迫三叉神经节治疗顽固性短暂性单侧神经痛性头痛伴结膜红肿综合征
Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_104_22
A. Chakravarty
Trigeminal Autonomic Cephalgia (TAC) refers to a group of disorders involving afferent activation of trigeminal system from the pain-perceiving intracranial structures. Short unilateral neuralgiform headache with conjunctival redness and tearing (SUNCT) is a sub-group of TAC which at times can be refractory to treatment. Percutaneous balloon compression (PBC) of the trigeminal ganglion is an established treatment modality for trigeminal neuralgia. However, PBC has been sparingly utilized for treatment of SUNCT. In this case report we intend to highlight good long-term results of PBC for treatment of refractory SUNCT.
三叉神经自主神经性头痛(TAC)是一组涉及三叉神经系统从痛觉颅内结构传入激活的疾病。短期单侧神经痛性头痛伴结膜红肿和撕裂(SUNCT)是TAC的一个亚组,有时难以治疗。经皮球囊压迫三叉神经节(PBC)是三叉神经痛的既定治疗方式。然而,PBC很少用于SUNCT的治疗。在这个病例报告中,我们打算强调PBC治疗难治性SUNCT的良好长期结果。
{"title":"Percutaneous balloon compression of the trigeminal ganglion for refractory short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache with conjunctival redness and tearing syndrome","authors":"A. Chakravarty","doi":"10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_104_22","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_104_22","url":null,"abstract":"Trigeminal Autonomic Cephalgia (TAC) refers to a group of disorders involving afferent activation of trigeminal system from the pain-perceiving intracranial structures. Short unilateral neuralgiform headache with conjunctival redness and tearing (SUNCT) is a sub-group of TAC which at times can be refractory to treatment. Percutaneous balloon compression (PBC) of the trigeminal ganglion is an established treatment modality for trigeminal neuralgia. However, PBC has been sparingly utilized for treatment of SUNCT. In this case report we intend to highlight good long-term results of PBC for treatment of refractory SUNCT.","PeriodicalId":32328,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Pain","volume":"37 1","pages":"50 - 52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48346792","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pain severity and quality of life following major mandibular reconstructive surgery in head neck cancer 癌症头颈部大型下颌骨重建手术后的疼痛程度和生活质量
Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_80_22
Aparna Gotur, A. Chatterjee
Background: Pain is a common symptom in patients undergoing major mandibular surgeries and reconstruction. To date, no studies have been done to assess the severity of pain and its effect on the quality of life post this surgery. Aim: To assess pain severity in the perioperative period and its impact on quality of life in head-and-neck cancer patients undergoing major mandibular resection with reconstruction. Primary Objective: To assess pain severity in the first 7 days following surgery. Secondary Objective: To identify the proportion of patients who continue to have pain at 4-month postsurgery and its impact on quality of life. Design: Prospective observational study. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted in a tertiary care cancer center. Between February and June 2016, 51 head-and-neck cancer patients undergoing reconstructive surgery were enrolled in the study after written informed consent. The pain was assessed using an 11-point Numerical rating scale (NRS) preoperatively, at 7 days, 1- and 4-month postsurgery, and quality of life was assessed by brief pain inventory (BPI). Results: Moderate-to-severe pain was reported by 46 patients (90.2%) on the 1st day and 44 patients (86.3%) on the 2nd post-operative day, which reduced to 27 patients (52.9%) over the next 2 days. By day 5, 48 (94.1%) patients had mild pain. By 1 month, 39 patients (76.5%) had moderate pain. By 4 months, 49 patients (96.1%) had mild pain, while two patients (3.9%) had severe pain. Quality of life was maximally affected at the end of the 1st month in all patients. At 4 months, only 1 (2%) patient had the affection of quality of life. This patient had severe preoperative pain. Conclusion: In patients undergoing extensive resection and reconstruction, moderate-to-severe pain was noted not only in the immediate postoperative period, but up to 1-month postsurgery and affected their quality of life. Stringent perioperative analgesia guidelines are needed in managing such patients and improving their quality of life.
背景:疼痛是接受大型下颌骨手术和重建的患者的常见症状。到目前为止,还没有进行任何研究来评估手术后疼痛的严重程度及其对生活质量的影响。目的:评估癌症头颈部切除重建术患者围手术期疼痛程度及其对生活质量的影响。主要目的:评估手术后前7天的疼痛严重程度。次要目的:确定术后4个月仍有疼痛的患者比例及其对生活质量的影响。设计:前瞻性观察研究。材料和方法:本研究在癌症三级医疗中心进行。2016年2月至6月,51名接受重建手术的癌症头颈部患者在获得书面知情同意后参与了该研究。术前、术后7天、1个月和4个月使用11点数字评定量表(NRS)评估疼痛,并通过简短疼痛清单(BPI)评估生活质量。结果:术后第1天有46名患者(90.2%)报告中度至重度疼痛,第2天有44名患者(86.3%)报告,在接下来的2天内,这一数字降至27名患者(52.9%)。到第5天,48名(94.1%)患者出现轻度疼痛。到1个月时,39名患者(76.5%)出现中度疼痛。到4个月时,49名患者(96.1%)出现轻度疼痛,2名患者(3.9%)出现重度疼痛。所有患者的生活质量在第一个月底受到的影响最大。4个月时,仅有1例(2%)患者对生活质量有影响。该患者术前疼痛严重。结论:在接受大面积切除和重建的患者中,中重度疼痛不仅在术后不久,而且在术后1个月内都会出现,影响了他们的生活质量。需要严格的围手术期镇痛指南来管理这些患者并提高他们的生活质量。
{"title":"Pain severity and quality of life following major mandibular reconstructive surgery in head neck cancer","authors":"Aparna Gotur, A. Chatterjee","doi":"10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_80_22","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_80_22","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Pain is a common symptom in patients undergoing major mandibular surgeries and reconstruction. To date, no studies have been done to assess the severity of pain and its effect on the quality of life post this surgery. Aim: To assess pain severity in the perioperative period and its impact on quality of life in head-and-neck cancer patients undergoing major mandibular resection with reconstruction. Primary Objective: To assess pain severity in the first 7 days following surgery. Secondary Objective: To identify the proportion of patients who continue to have pain at 4-month postsurgery and its impact on quality of life. Design: Prospective observational study. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted in a tertiary care cancer center. Between February and June 2016, 51 head-and-neck cancer patients undergoing reconstructive surgery were enrolled in the study after written informed consent. The pain was assessed using an 11-point Numerical rating scale (NRS) preoperatively, at 7 days, 1- and 4-month postsurgery, and quality of life was assessed by brief pain inventory (BPI). Results: Moderate-to-severe pain was reported by 46 patients (90.2%) on the 1st day and 44 patients (86.3%) on the 2nd post-operative day, which reduced to 27 patients (52.9%) over the next 2 days. By day 5, 48 (94.1%) patients had mild pain. By 1 month, 39 patients (76.5%) had moderate pain. By 4 months, 49 patients (96.1%) had mild pain, while two patients (3.9%) had severe pain. Quality of life was maximally affected at the end of the 1st month in all patients. At 4 months, only 1 (2%) patient had the affection of quality of life. This patient had severe preoperative pain. Conclusion: In patients undergoing extensive resection and reconstruction, moderate-to-severe pain was noted not only in the immediate postoperative period, but up to 1-month postsurgery and affected their quality of life. Stringent perioperative analgesia guidelines are needed in managing such patients and improving their quality of life.","PeriodicalId":32328,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Pain","volume":"37 1","pages":"20 - 26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49349096","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Indian Journal of Pain
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1