{"title":"The Clinical Use of Social System Theory in Marriage Counseling","authors":"M. Kargman","doi":"10.2307/348881","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/348881","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":324526,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Sociology Review","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1957-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133226749","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The past twenty-five years have witnessed a great change in the behavior of sociologists. A quarter of a century ago the majority of sociologists might fairly have been labeled either philosophers or reformers. They dreamed on the one hand of cosmic cycles in the affairs of men; on the other hand, of utopia realized on earth. Today the great majority of sociologists-at least of the younger generation of sociologists-are scientists, attempting to develop methodology and techniques which will yield a greater understanding of, and, we may hope, control over man's social behavior. Many factors inherent in the cultural trends of our generation have contributed to this change. It has not been the result of sociological thought alone, much less the achievement of a particular "school" of sociology. On the other hand, it was at the University of Chicago, in the graduate department of sociology, in the decade following the war, that the sociologist's changed conception of his role was first clarified and began to yield fruit in the type of research now characteristic of sociological science. The sociology department of the University of Chicago was an exciting intellectual atmosphere to the graduate students of that decade. The older concept of sociology was represented in the person of Albion Small, head of the department, then in the last years of his notable career. The emerging concept of sociology as science was represented by Robert E. Park and Ernest W. Burgess. In his first year the student came under the influence of both points of view. Small was a scholar, in the finest sense of the word. He took the student through the history of sociological thought, requiring that the student document his progress as he went. Small was a logician as well. He insisted that the student should, if he could, reason his way through the documentary evidence. Small, the logician, strove
{"title":"SOCIOLOGY IN THE CLINIC","authors":"Harvey W. Zorbaugh","doi":"10.2307/2262109","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/2262109","url":null,"abstract":"The past twenty-five years have witnessed a great change in the behavior of sociologists. A quarter of a century ago the majority of sociologists might fairly have been labeled either philosophers or reformers. They dreamed on the one hand of cosmic cycles in the affairs of men; on the other hand, of utopia realized on earth. Today the great majority of sociologists-at least of the younger generation of sociologists-are scientists, attempting to develop methodology and techniques which will yield a greater understanding of, and, we may hope, control over man's social behavior. Many factors inherent in the cultural trends of our generation have contributed to this change. It has not been the result of sociological thought alone, much less the achievement of a particular \"school\" of sociology. On the other hand, it was at the University of Chicago, in the graduate department of sociology, in the decade following the war, that the sociologist's changed conception of his role was first clarified and began to yield fruit in the type of research now characteristic of sociological science. The sociology department of the University of Chicago was an exciting intellectual atmosphere to the graduate students of that decade. The older concept of sociology was represented in the person of Albion Small, head of the department, then in the last years of his notable career. The emerging concept of sociology as science was represented by Robert E. Park and Ernest W. Burgess. In his first year the student came under the influence of both points of view. Small was a scholar, in the finest sense of the word. He took the student through the history of sociological thought, requiring that the student document his progress as he went. Small was a logician as well. He insisted that the student should, if he could, reason his way through the documentary evidence. Small, the logician, strove","PeriodicalId":324526,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Sociology Review","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1939-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125549985","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The New Language of Qualitative Method","authors":"S. Eve","doi":"10.5860/choice.35-2780","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.35-2780","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":324526,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Sociology Review","volume":"128 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133154933","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Social Costs of Genetic Welfare","authors":"W. D. Davis","doi":"10.5860/choice.29-5405","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.29-5405","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":324526,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Sociology Review","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129664784","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Occupational Subcultures in the Workplace","authors":"R. Livigni","doi":"10.5860/choice.31-1034","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.31-1034","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":324526,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Sociology Review","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126228353","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In a war-surviving world, dazed and groggy from lightning-jet fighter planes, superfortresses, radar, and atomic bombs, it is difficult for most of us to take a balanced, dispassionate view of racial and cultural relations. But, since modern means of communication have made our world a narrow neighborhood, civilization can only survive by placing the contacts of races, classes, and nations upon a reasonable, brotherly basis. These contacts are grounded in everyday relations. Race relations are everyday contacts of people of different physical and social inheritance in their places of work, their churches, synagogues, mosques, schools, homes, on the street, and in their social and civic organizations. Intercultural relations are everyday contacts of people whose attitudes and behavior patterns have been conditioned by different religious beliefs, by family habits, by various ways of doing things. Problems of major adjustment between individuals and groups are created by these contacts. Jews and Gentiles misunderstand because of different religious beliefs. Negro and white Americans have problems out of past attitudes and practices. Chinese eating rice with chopsticks and Americans or Britishers eating beef with knives and forks display habits which necessitate more understanding and good will on the part of the community which eats with some other device-or cultural disharmony exists. Dominant forces in our civilized society, if not in the so-called "uncivilized" societies, are the beliefs, the attitudes, the mores that control behavior. These are mental forces; they are moral; they are religious. They apply to people-individuals and groups. People who have failed to achieve certain desires or goals become frustrated. Instead of accepting their failure or discovering some weakness or mistake in their own effort they seek scapegoats to
{"title":"Clinical Methods in Interracial and Intercultural Relations","authors":"G. Haynes","doi":"10.2307/2263232","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/2263232","url":null,"abstract":"In a war-surviving world, dazed and groggy from lightning-jet fighter planes, superfortresses, radar, and atomic bombs, it is difficult for most of us to take a balanced, dispassionate view of racial and cultural relations. But, since modern means of communication have made our world a narrow neighborhood, civilization can only survive by placing the contacts of races, classes, and nations upon a reasonable, brotherly basis. These contacts are grounded in everyday relations. Race relations are everyday contacts of people of different physical and social inheritance in their places of work, their churches, synagogues, mosques, schools, homes, on the street, and in their social and civic organizations. Intercultural relations are everyday contacts of people whose attitudes and behavior patterns have been conditioned by different religious beliefs, by family habits, by various ways of doing things. Problems of major adjustment between individuals and groups are created by these contacts. Jews and Gentiles misunderstand because of different religious beliefs. Negro and white Americans have problems out of past attitudes and practices. Chinese eating rice with chopsticks and Americans or Britishers eating beef with knives and forks display habits which necessitate more understanding and good will on the part of the community which eats with some other device-or cultural disharmony exists. Dominant forces in our civilized society, if not in the so-called \"uncivilized\" societies, are the beliefs, the attitudes, the mores that control behavior. These are mental forces; they are moral; they are religious. They apply to people-individuals and groups. People who have failed to achieve certain desires or goals become frustrated. Instead of accepting their failure or discovering some weakness or mistake in their own effort they seek scapegoats to","PeriodicalId":324526,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Sociology Review","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124956780","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Violent Emotions: Shame and Rage in Marital Quarrels","authors":"James A. Kitchens","doi":"10.5860/choice.29-3027","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.29-3027","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":324526,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Sociology Review","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123332845","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：