Pub Date : 2024-04-21DOI: 10.1177/00031348241248693
Keigo Nakashima, K. Haruki, Teppei Kamada, Junji Takahashi, Masashi Tsunematsu, H. Ohdaira, K. Furukawa, Yutaka Suzuki, Toru Ikegami
BACKGROUND The C-reactive protein (CRP)-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index is a novel immune nutrition scoring system associated with cancer prognosis. This study investigated the association between the CALLY index and the long-term outcomes of patients with gastric cancer. METHODS We included 175 patients with gastric cancer who underwent curative gastrectomies at the Department of Surgery, International University of Health and Welfare Hospital between January 2011 and October 2019. The CALLY index was calculated based on the levels of serum albumin, serum CRP, and peripheral lymphocyte count. Utilizing both univariate and multivariate analyses, the prognostic value of the CALLY index was investigated. RESULTS In the multivariate analyses, disease stage (hazard ratio [HR], 7.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.31-18.6; P < .01), microvascular invasion (HR, 2.88; 95% CI, 1.30-6.36; P < .01), and low CALLY index (HR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.00-4.76; P = .05) were independent and significant predictors of disease-free survival. Low body mass index (HR, 4.15; 95% CI, 1.63-10.6; P < .01), advanced disease stage (HR, 8.22; 95% CI, 3.47-19.5; P < .01), and low CALLY index (HR, 3.00; 95% CI, 1.3-6.93; P = .01) were independent and significant predictors of overall survival. The low CALLY index group had a lower body mass index (P < .01), advanced disease stage (P < .01), and a higher Glasgow prognostic score (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS The CALLY index may be associated with a poor prognosis for gastric cancer, highlighting the utility of a comprehensive assessment using inflammatory, nutritional, and immunological statuses.
{"title":"Usefulness of the C-Reactive Protein (CRP)-Albumin-Lymphocyte (CALLY) Index as a Prognostic Indicator for Patients With Gastric Cancer.","authors":"Keigo Nakashima, K. Haruki, Teppei Kamada, Junji Takahashi, Masashi Tsunematsu, H. Ohdaira, K. Furukawa, Yutaka Suzuki, Toru Ikegami","doi":"10.1177/00031348241248693","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348241248693","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\u0000The C-reactive protein (CRP)-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index is a novel immune nutrition scoring system associated with cancer prognosis. This study investigated the association between the CALLY index and the long-term outcomes of patients with gastric cancer.\u0000\u0000\u0000METHODS\u0000We included 175 patients with gastric cancer who underwent curative gastrectomies at the Department of Surgery, International University of Health and Welfare Hospital between January 2011 and October 2019. The CALLY index was calculated based on the levels of serum albumin, serum CRP, and peripheral lymphocyte count. Utilizing both univariate and multivariate analyses, the prognostic value of the CALLY index was investigated.\u0000\u0000\u0000RESULTS\u0000In the multivariate analyses, disease stage (hazard ratio [HR], 7.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.31-18.6; P < .01), microvascular invasion (HR, 2.88; 95% CI, 1.30-6.36; P < .01), and low CALLY index (HR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.00-4.76; P = .05) were independent and significant predictors of disease-free survival. Low body mass index (HR, 4.15; 95% CI, 1.63-10.6; P < .01), advanced disease stage (HR, 8.22; 95% CI, 3.47-19.5; P < .01), and low CALLY index (HR, 3.00; 95% CI, 1.3-6.93; P = .01) were independent and significant predictors of overall survival. The low CALLY index group had a lower body mass index (P < .01), advanced disease stage (P < .01), and a higher Glasgow prognostic score (P < .01).\u0000\u0000\u0000CONCLUSIONS\u0000The CALLY index may be associated with a poor prognosis for gastric cancer, highlighting the utility of a comprehensive assessment using inflammatory, nutritional, and immunological statuses.","PeriodicalId":325363,"journal":{"name":"The American Surgeon","volume":"101 22","pages":"31348241248693"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140678981","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-20DOI: 10.1177/00031348241248696
Falisha F. Kanji, Aleeque Marselian, Miguel Burch, Monica Jain, Tara N Cohen
BACKGROUND The utilization of robot-assisted approaches to surgery has increased significantly over the last two decades. This has introduced novel complexities into the operating room environment, requiring management of new challenges and workflow adaptation. This study aimed to analyze challenges in the surgical setup for complex upper gastrointestinal robot-assisted surgery (UGI-RAS) and identify opportunities for solutions. METHODS Direct observations of surgical setup processes for UGI-RAS were performed by a trained Human Factors researcher at a non-profit academic medical center in Southern California. Setup tasks were subdivided into five phases: (1) before wheels-in; (2) patient transfer and anesthesia induction; (3) patient preparation; (4) surgery preparation; and (5) robot docking. Start/end times for each phase/task were documented along with workflow disruption (FD) narratives and timestamps. Setup tasks and FDs were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS Twenty UGI-RAS setup procedures were observed between May-November 2023: sleeve gastrectomy +/- hiatal hernia repair (n = 9, 45.00%); para-esophageal hernia repair +/- fundoplication (n = 8, 40.00%); revision to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (n = 2, 10.00%); and gastric band removal (n = 1, 5.00%). Frequent FDs included planning breakdowns (n = 20, 29.85%), equipment/supply management (n = 17, 25.37%), patient care coordination (n = 8, 11.94%), and equipment challenges (n = 8, 11.94%). Eleven of 20 observations were first-start cases, of which 10 experienced delayed starts. DISCUSSION Interventions aimed at improving workflows during UGI-RAS setup include performing pre-operative team huddles and conducting trainings aimed at team coordination and equipment challenges. These solutions could result in improved teamwork, efficiency, and communication while reducing case start delays and turnover time.
{"title":"Challenges With Robot-Assisted Surgery Setup for Complex Minimally Invasive Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery.","authors":"Falisha F. Kanji, Aleeque Marselian, Miguel Burch, Monica Jain, Tara N Cohen","doi":"10.1177/00031348241248696","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348241248696","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\u0000The utilization of robot-assisted approaches to surgery has increased significantly over the last two decades. This has introduced novel complexities into the operating room environment, requiring management of new challenges and workflow adaptation. This study aimed to analyze challenges in the surgical setup for complex upper gastrointestinal robot-assisted surgery (UGI-RAS) and identify opportunities for solutions.\u0000\u0000\u0000METHODS\u0000Direct observations of surgical setup processes for UGI-RAS were performed by a trained Human Factors researcher at a non-profit academic medical center in Southern California. Setup tasks were subdivided into five phases: (1) before wheels-in; (2) patient transfer and anesthesia induction; (3) patient preparation; (4) surgery preparation; and (5) robot docking. Start/end times for each phase/task were documented along with workflow disruption (FD) narratives and timestamps. Setup tasks and FDs were analyzed using descriptive statistics.\u0000\u0000\u0000RESULTS\u0000Twenty UGI-RAS setup procedures were observed between May-November 2023: sleeve gastrectomy +/- hiatal hernia repair (n = 9, 45.00%); para-esophageal hernia repair +/- fundoplication (n = 8, 40.00%); revision to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (n = 2, 10.00%); and gastric band removal (n = 1, 5.00%). Frequent FDs included planning breakdowns (n = 20, 29.85%), equipment/supply management (n = 17, 25.37%), patient care coordination (n = 8, 11.94%), and equipment challenges (n = 8, 11.94%). Eleven of 20 observations were first-start cases, of which 10 experienced delayed starts.\u0000\u0000\u0000DISCUSSION\u0000Interventions aimed at improving workflows during UGI-RAS setup include performing pre-operative team huddles and conducting trainings aimed at team coordination and equipment challenges. These solutions could result in improved teamwork, efficiency, and communication while reducing case start delays and turnover time.","PeriodicalId":325363,"journal":{"name":"The American Surgeon","volume":" 8","pages":"31348241248696"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140681367","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-20DOI: 10.1177/00031348241248700
Lydia C Rewerts, L. Stuke, John P. Hunt, Alan B Marr, J. Schoen, P. Greiffenstein, Alison A Smith
Empyema resulting as a complication of penetrating diaphragmatic injuries is a subject that requires further investigation, and the aim of this study was to determine the risk factors associated with empyema in patients with penetrating trauma. Consecutive adult trauma patients from a level 1 trauma center were searched for penetrating diaphragm injuries. Data were collected on patient demographics, pre-existing conditions, injury type and severity, hospital interventions, in-hospital complications, and outcomes. Patients were stratified by empyema formation and univariant analyses were performed. 164 patients were identified, and 17 patients (10.4%) developed empyema. Empyema was associated with visible abdominal contamination (35.3% vs 15%, P = .04), thoracotomy (35.5% vs 13.6%, P = .03), pneumonia (41.2% vs 14.3%, P = .01), sepsis (35.3% vs 8.8%, P = .006), increased hospital length of stay (25.5 vs 10.1 days, p =<.001), increased intensive care unit length of stay (9.6 vs 4.3 days, P = .01), and decreased in-hospital mortality (0% vs 20.4%, P = .04).
作为穿透性膈肌损伤的并发症而导致的肺水肿是一个需要进一步研究的课题，本研究旨在确定穿透性创伤患者出现肺水肿的相关风险因素。研究人员对一级创伤中心的连续成年创伤患者进行了穿透性膈肌损伤检索。收集的数据包括患者的人口统计学特征、原有病症、损伤类型和严重程度、医院干预措施、院内并发症以及治疗结果。根据肺水肿的形成对患者进行分层，并进行单变量分析。结果发现，164 名患者中有 17 名（10.4%）出现了肺水肿。气肿与可见腹腔污染（35.3% vs 15%，P = .04）、开胸手术（35.5% vs 13.6%，P = .03）、肺炎（41.2% vs 14.3%，P = .01）、败血症（35.3% vs 8.8%，P = .006）、住院时间延长（25.5 天 vs 10.1 天，P =<.001）、重症监护室住院时间延长（9.6 天 vs 4.3 天，P = .01）、院内死亡率降低（0% vs 20.4%，P = .04）。
{"title":"Risk Factors for Empyema Following Penetrating Diaphragmatic Injuries.","authors":"Lydia C Rewerts, L. Stuke, John P. Hunt, Alan B Marr, J. Schoen, P. Greiffenstein, Alison A Smith","doi":"10.1177/00031348241248700","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348241248700","url":null,"abstract":"Empyema resulting as a complication of penetrating diaphragmatic injuries is a subject that requires further investigation, and the aim of this study was to determine the risk factors associated with empyema in patients with penetrating trauma. Consecutive adult trauma patients from a level 1 trauma center were searched for penetrating diaphragm injuries. Data were collected on patient demographics, pre-existing conditions, injury type and severity, hospital interventions, in-hospital complications, and outcomes. Patients were stratified by empyema formation and univariant analyses were performed. 164 patients were identified, and 17 patients (10.4%) developed empyema. Empyema was associated with visible abdominal contamination (35.3% vs 15%, P = .04), thoracotomy (35.5% vs 13.6%, P = .03), pneumonia (41.2% vs 14.3%, P = .01), sepsis (35.3% vs 8.8%, P = .006), increased hospital length of stay (25.5 vs 10.1 days, p =<.001), increased intensive care unit length of stay (9.6 vs 4.3 days, P = .01), and decreased in-hospital mortality (0% vs 20.4%, P = .04).","PeriodicalId":325363,"journal":{"name":"The American Surgeon","volume":" 1017","pages":"31348241248700"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140682214","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-19DOI: 10.1177/00031348241248817
Adam W Scott, S. Amateau, D. Leslie, S. Ikramuddin, Eric S Wise
Background: The vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) is a historic restrictive bariatric operation often requiring further surgery. In this investigation utilizing the 2021 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) national dataset, we aim to better define the outcomes of VBG conversions.Methods: We queried the 2021 MBSAQIP dataset for patients who underwent a conversion from a VBG to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Demographics, comorbidities, laboratory values, and additional patient factors were examined. Rates of key consequential outcome measures 30-day readmission, reoperation, reintervention, mortality, and a composite endpoint (at least 1 of the 4) were further calculated.Results: We identified 231 patients who underwent conversion from VBG to SG (n = 23), RYGB (n = 208), or other anatomy (n = 6), of which 93% of patients were female, and 22% of non-white race. The median age was 56 years and body-mass index (BMI) was 43 kg/m2. The most common surgical indications included weight considerations (48%), reflux (25%), anatomic causes (eg, stricture, fistula, and ulcer; 10%), and dysphagia (6.5%). Thirty-day morbidity rates included reoperation (7.8%), readmission (9.1%), reintervention (4.3%), mortality (.4%), and the composite endpoint (15%). Upon bivariate analysis, we did not identify any specific risk factor for the 30-day composite endpoint.Discussion: One-stage VBG conversions to traditional bariatric anatomy are beset with higher 30-day morbidity relative to primary procedures. Additional MBSAQIP data will be required for aggregation, to better characterize the risk factors inherent in these operations.
{"title":"Rates and Risk Factors for 30-Day Morbidity After One-Stage Vertical Banded Gastroplasty Conversions: A Retrospective Analysis.","authors":"Adam W Scott, S. Amateau, D. Leslie, S. Ikramuddin, Eric S Wise","doi":"10.1177/00031348241248817","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348241248817","url":null,"abstract":"Background: The vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) is a historic restrictive bariatric operation often requiring further surgery. In this investigation utilizing the 2021 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) national dataset, we aim to better define the outcomes of VBG conversions.Methods: We queried the 2021 MBSAQIP dataset for patients who underwent a conversion from a VBG to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Demographics, comorbidities, laboratory values, and additional patient factors were examined. Rates of key consequential outcome measures 30-day readmission, reoperation, reintervention, mortality, and a composite endpoint (at least 1 of the 4) were further calculated.Results: We identified 231 patients who underwent conversion from VBG to SG (n = 23), RYGB (n = 208), or other anatomy (n = 6), of which 93% of patients were female, and 22% of non-white race. The median age was 56 years and body-mass index (BMI) was 43 kg/m2. The most common surgical indications included weight considerations (48%), reflux (25%), anatomic causes (eg, stricture, fistula, and ulcer; 10%), and dysphagia (6.5%). Thirty-day morbidity rates included reoperation (7.8%), readmission (9.1%), reintervention (4.3%), mortality (.4%), and the composite endpoint (15%). Upon bivariate analysis, we did not identify any specific risk factor for the 30-day composite endpoint.Discussion: One-stage VBG conversions to traditional bariatric anatomy are beset with higher 30-day morbidity relative to primary procedures. Additional MBSAQIP data will be required for aggregation, to better characterize the risk factors inherent in these operations.","PeriodicalId":325363,"journal":{"name":"The American Surgeon","volume":" 29","pages":"31348241248817"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140685713","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-19DOI: 10.1177/00031348241248791
Konmal Ali, Amulya Vadlakonda, Sara Sakowitz, Zihan Gao, Shineui Kim, N. Y. Cho, Giselle Porter, P. Benharash
BACKGROUND Appendectomy remains a common pediatric surgical procedure with an estimated 80,000 operations performed each year. While prior work has reported the existence of racial disparities in postoperative outcomes, we sought to characterize potential income-based inequalities using a national cohort. METHODS All non-elective pediatric (<18 years) hospitalizations for appendectomy were tabulated in the 2016-2020 National Inpatient Sample. Only those in the highest (HI) and lowest income (LI) quartiles were considered for analysis. Multivariable regression models were developed to assess the independent association of income and postoperative major adverse events (MAE). RESULTS Of an estimated 87,830 patients, 36,845 (42.0%) were HI and 50,985 (58.0%) were LI. On average, LI patients were younger (11 [7-14] vs 12 [8-15] years, P < .001), more frequently insured by Medicaid (70.7 vs 27.3%, P < .05), and more commonly of Hispanic ethnicity (50.8 vs 23.4%, P < .001). Following risk adjustment, the LI cohort was associated with greater odds of MAE (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.30 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.64). Specifically, low-income status was linked with increased odds of infectious (AOR 1.65, 95% CI 1.12-2.42) and respiratory (AOR 1.67, 95% CI 1.06-2.62) complications. Further, LI was associated with a $1670 decrement in costs ([2220-$1120]) and a +.32-day increase in duration of stay (95% CI [.21-.44]). CONCLUSION Pediatric patients of the lowest income quartile faced increased risk of major adverse events following appendectomy compared to those of highest income. Novel risk stratification methods and standardized care pathways are needed to ameliorate socioeconomic disparities in postoperative outcomes.
背景阑尾切除术仍然是一种常见的儿科外科手术，每年估计要进行 80,000 例手术。虽然之前的研究已经报道了术后结果中存在的种族差异，但我们试图利用全国性队列来描述潜在的基于收入的不平等。方法在 2016-2020 年全国住院病人抽样中，对所有非选择性儿科（小于 18 岁）阑尾切除术住院病人进行了统计。分析中仅考虑最高收入（HI）和最低收入（LI）四分位数的患者。结果 在约 87830 名患者中，36845 人（42.0%）为 HI，50985 人（58.0%）为 LI。平均而言，LI 患者更年轻（11 [7-14] 岁 vs 12 [8-15] 岁，P < .001），更多参加医疗补助计划（70.7% vs 27.3%，P < .05），更多属于西班牙裔（50.8% vs 23.4%，P < .001）。经过风险调整后，低收入人群患 MAE 的几率更大（调整后的几率比 [AOR] 1.30 95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.06-1.64）。具体来说，低收入状况与感染性并发症（AOR 1.65，95% CI 1.12-2.42）和呼吸系统并发症（AOR 1.67，95% CI 1.06-2.62）几率增加有关。此外，低收入与费用减少 1670 美元（[2220-1120 美元]）和住院时间增加 +.32 天（95% CI [.21-.44]）相关。需要新的风险分层方法和标准化护理路径来改善术后结果的社会经济差异。
{"title":"Income-Based Disparities in Outcomes Following Pediatric Appendectomy: A National Analysis.","authors":"Konmal Ali, Amulya Vadlakonda, Sara Sakowitz, Zihan Gao, Shineui Kim, N. Y. Cho, Giselle Porter, P. Benharash","doi":"10.1177/00031348241248791","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348241248791","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\u0000Appendectomy remains a common pediatric surgical procedure with an estimated 80,000 operations performed each year. While prior work has reported the existence of racial disparities in postoperative outcomes, we sought to characterize potential income-based inequalities using a national cohort.\u0000\u0000\u0000METHODS\u0000All non-elective pediatric (<18 years) hospitalizations for appendectomy were tabulated in the 2016-2020 National Inpatient Sample. Only those in the highest (HI) and lowest income (LI) quartiles were considered for analysis. Multivariable regression models were developed to assess the independent association of income and postoperative major adverse events (MAE).\u0000\u0000\u0000RESULTS\u0000Of an estimated 87,830 patients, 36,845 (42.0%) were HI and 50,985 (58.0%) were LI. On average, LI patients were younger (11 [7-14] vs 12 [8-15] years, P < .001), more frequently insured by Medicaid (70.7 vs 27.3%, P < .05), and more commonly of Hispanic ethnicity (50.8 vs 23.4%, P < .001). Following risk adjustment, the LI cohort was associated with greater odds of MAE (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.30 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.64). Specifically, low-income status was linked with increased odds of infectious (AOR 1.65, 95% CI 1.12-2.42) and respiratory (AOR 1.67, 95% CI 1.06-2.62) complications. Further, LI was associated with a $1670 decrement in costs ([2220-$1120]) and a +.32-day increase in duration of stay (95% CI [.21-.44]).\u0000\u0000\u0000CONCLUSION\u0000Pediatric patients of the lowest income quartile faced increased risk of major adverse events following appendectomy compared to those of highest income. Novel risk stratification methods and standardized care pathways are needed to ameliorate socioeconomic disparities in postoperative outcomes.","PeriodicalId":325363,"journal":{"name":"The American Surgeon","volume":" 497","pages":"31348241248791"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140682616","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-19DOI: 10.1177/00031348241248784
Elliot Silver, J. Nahmias, M. Lekawa, Kenji Inaba, M. Schellenberg, C. D. de Virgilio, A. Grigorian
Objective: Many current trauma mortality prediction tools are either too intricate or rely on data not readily available during a trauma patient's initial evaluation. Moreover, none are tailored to those necessitating urgent or emergent surgery. Our objective was to design a practical, user-friendly scoring tool using immediately available variables, and then compare its efficacy to the widely-known Revised Trauma Score (RTS). Methods: The adult 2017-2021 Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database was queried to identify patients ≥18 years old undergoing any urgent/emergent operation (direct from Emergency Department to operating room). Patients were divided into derivation and validation groups. A three-step methodology was used. First, multiple logistic regression models were created to determine risk of death using only variables available upon arrival. Second, the weighted average and relative impact of each independent predictor was used to derive an easily calculated Immediate Operative Trauma Assessment Score (IOTAS). We then validated IOTAS using AUROC and compared it to RTS. Results: From 249 208 patients in the derivation-set, 14 635 (5.9%) died. Age ≥65, Glasgow Coma Scale score <9, hypotension (SBP <90 mmHg), and tachycardia (>120/min) on arrival were identified as independent predictors for mortality. Using these, the IOTAS was structured, offering scores between 0-8. The AUROC for this was .88. A clear escalation in mortality was observed across scores: from 4.4% at score 1 to 60.5% at score 8. For the validation set (250 182 patients; mortality rate 5.8%), the AUROC remained consistent at .87, surpassing RTS's AUROC of .83. Conclusion: IOTAS is a novel, accurate, and now validated tool that is intuitive and efficient in predicting mortality for trauma patients requiring urgent or emergent surgeries. It outperforms RTS, and thereby may help guide clinicians when determining the best course of action in patient management as well as counseling patients and their families.
{"title":"Immediate Operative Trauma Assessment Score: A Simple and Reliable Predictor of Mortality in Trauma Patients Undergoing Urgent/Emergent Surgery.","authors":"Elliot Silver, J. Nahmias, M. Lekawa, Kenji Inaba, M. Schellenberg, C. D. de Virgilio, A. Grigorian","doi":"10.1177/00031348241248784","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348241248784","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Many current trauma mortality prediction tools are either too intricate or rely on data not readily available during a trauma patient's initial evaluation. Moreover, none are tailored to those necessitating urgent or emergent surgery. Our objective was to design a practical, user-friendly scoring tool using immediately available variables, and then compare its efficacy to the widely-known Revised Trauma Score (RTS). Methods: The adult 2017-2021 Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database was queried to identify patients ≥18 years old undergoing any urgent/emergent operation (direct from Emergency Department to operating room). Patients were divided into derivation and validation groups. A three-step methodology was used. First, multiple logistic regression models were created to determine risk of death using only variables available upon arrival. Second, the weighted average and relative impact of each independent predictor was used to derive an easily calculated Immediate Operative Trauma Assessment Score (IOTAS). We then validated IOTAS using AUROC and compared it to RTS. Results: From 249 208 patients in the derivation-set, 14 635 (5.9%) died. Age ≥65, Glasgow Coma Scale score <9, hypotension (SBP <90 mmHg), and tachycardia (>120/min) on arrival were identified as independent predictors for mortality. Using these, the IOTAS was structured, offering scores between 0-8. The AUROC for this was .88. A clear escalation in mortality was observed across scores: from 4.4% at score 1 to 60.5% at score 8. For the validation set (250 182 patients; mortality rate 5.8%), the AUROC remained consistent at .87, surpassing RTS's AUROC of .83. Conclusion: IOTAS is a novel, accurate, and now validated tool that is intuitive and efficient in predicting mortality for trauma patients requiring urgent or emergent surgeries. It outperforms RTS, and thereby may help guide clinicians when determining the best course of action in patient management as well as counseling patients and their families.","PeriodicalId":325363,"journal":{"name":"The American Surgeon","volume":" 42","pages":"31348241248784"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140684796","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-19DOI: 10.1177/00031348241248793
Stefania Montero, Isabela Sandigo-Saballos, Cynthia Tom, Hanjoo Lee
INTRODUCTION The Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology (LAST) Project recommended unified classification for HPV-associated squamous lesions of the lower anogenital tract, using a 2-tiered nomenclature in 2013. Adherence to the new nomenclature worldwide is unknown. This study aims to assess the trend of the use of the two-tiered High Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion and Low Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (HSIL/LSIL) as opposed to the traditional three-tiered Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia (AIN I/II/III) classification as suggested by the LAST Project. METHODS A literature search on full-text English language studies of premalignant anal lesion was performed on PubMed from 2002-2022. The studies were categorized by continent, and the prevalence of HSIL/LSIL classification vs AIN I/II/III was calculated. RESULTS 546 studies and 251 studies were identified using the AIN I/II/II and the HSIL/LSIL classification respectively. Global trend suggested a statistically significant downward trend in the use of the two-tiered nomenclature system in publications globally. Regional trend including North America, Europe, and other (Asia and Latin America) showed variance in adoption of the two-tiered nomenclature system. CONCLUSION Despite multidisciplinary collaborative effort, adherence to the recommendations to use the two-tiered system for HPV-associated premalignant anal lesions continues to be suboptimal. Further efforts are needed to identify the cause of poor adherence to be able to create strategies that reinforces unification of terminology and integration of LAST the recommendations.
简介：2013 年，下生殖道鳞状细胞术语（LAST）项目建议采用两级命名法对下生殖道的 HPV 相关鳞状细胞病变进行统一分类。全球范围内对新命名法的遵守情况尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估高鳞状上皮内病变和低鳞状上皮内病变（HSIL/LSIL）两级分类法与 LAST 项目建议的传统肛门上皮内瘤变（AIN I/II/III）三级分类法相比的使用趋势。方法2002-2022 年期间，在 PubMed 上对肛门恶性前病变的英文全文研究进行了文献检索。结果分别有 546 篇和 251 篇研究采用 AIN I/II/II 和 HSIL/LSIL 分类。全球趋势表明，全球出版物中使用两级命名系统的数量呈显著下降趋势。包括北美、欧洲和其他地区（亚洲和拉丁美洲）在内的地区趋势表明，在采用双层命名系统方面存在差异。结论尽管多学科合作努力，但对使用双层系统治疗与 HPV 相关的肛门恶性病变前病变的建议的遵守情况仍不理想。我们需要进一步努力，找出不能很好遵守建议的原因，以便制定策略，加强术语的统一和 LAST 建议的整合。
{"title":"Poor Acceptance of the Revised Classification of Premalignant Anal Lesions Following the LAST Standardized Project.","authors":"Stefania Montero, Isabela Sandigo-Saballos, Cynthia Tom, Hanjoo Lee","doi":"10.1177/00031348241248793","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348241248793","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\u0000The Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology (LAST) Project recommended unified classification for HPV-associated squamous lesions of the lower anogenital tract, using a 2-tiered nomenclature in 2013. Adherence to the new nomenclature worldwide is unknown. This study aims to assess the trend of the use of the two-tiered High Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion and Low Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (HSIL/LSIL) as opposed to the traditional three-tiered Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia (AIN I/II/III) classification as suggested by the LAST Project.\u0000\u0000\u0000METHODS\u0000A literature search on full-text English language studies of premalignant anal lesion was performed on PubMed from 2002-2022. The studies were categorized by continent, and the prevalence of HSIL/LSIL classification vs AIN I/II/III was calculated.\u0000\u0000\u0000RESULTS\u0000546 studies and 251 studies were identified using the AIN I/II/II and the HSIL/LSIL classification respectively. Global trend suggested a statistically significant downward trend in the use of the two-tiered nomenclature system in publications globally. Regional trend including North America, Europe, and other (Asia and Latin America) showed variance in adoption of the two-tiered nomenclature system.\u0000\u0000\u0000CONCLUSION\u0000Despite multidisciplinary collaborative effort, adherence to the recommendations to use the two-tiered system for HPV-associated premalignant anal lesions continues to be suboptimal. Further efforts are needed to identify the cause of poor adherence to be able to create strategies that reinforces unification of terminology and integration of LAST the recommendations.","PeriodicalId":325363,"journal":{"name":"The American Surgeon","volume":" 14","pages":"31348241248793"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140683334","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-18DOI: 10.1177/00031348241248564
Irena Stefanova, Ewan Kyle, Iain Wilson, Mohammed Tobbal, D. Veeramootoo, Henry D De'Ath
BACKGROUND Gallstone pancreatitis (GSP) is common in elderly patients and carries worse outcomes. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is recommended for prevention of recurrent GSP. In frail populations, an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with sphincterotomy (ERCP-s) is an alternative. Management guidelines of GSP in the elderly are lacking. This study aimed to investigate and compare management strategies for GSP in the elderly. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective comparison of outcome of patients aged ≥65 years with first presentation of GSP treated either with (1) LC only, (2) ERCP-s, (3) ERCP-S followed by LC, or (4) no intervention. RESULTS 216 patients were included. Median age was 76 years (interquartile range 70-83). Most (80%, n = 172) had mild pancreatitis, whilst 12% (n = 26) had severe disease. 24% (n = 55) were treated with ERCP-s; 40% (n = 87) underwent LC alone; 11% (n = 23) had ERCP-s followed by LC; and 25% (n = 55) received no intervention. Patients without intervention were older (P < .001) and frailer (P < .001). The LC-only group had lower post-procedure re-admission rates of 6% (n = 5) compared to 27% (n = 14) for ERCP-s, 33% (n = 7) for ERCP-S + LC, and 31% (n = 17) for the no intervention group (P = .0001). Biliary cause mortality was highest in the no intervention group (n = 11, 20%). CONCLUSION Laparoscopic cholecystectomy represents the gold standard for elderly patients with GSP.
{"title":"Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy vs Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography With Sphincterotomy in Elderly Patients With Acute Gallstone Pancreatitis.","authors":"Irena Stefanova, Ewan Kyle, Iain Wilson, Mohammed Tobbal, D. Veeramootoo, Henry D De'Ath","doi":"10.1177/00031348241248564","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348241248564","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\u0000Gallstone pancreatitis (GSP) is common in elderly patients and carries worse outcomes. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is recommended for prevention of recurrent GSP. In frail populations, an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with sphincterotomy (ERCP-s) is an alternative. Management guidelines of GSP in the elderly are lacking. This study aimed to investigate and compare management strategies for GSP in the elderly.\u0000\u0000\u0000MATERIALS AND METHODS\u0000A retrospective comparison of outcome of patients aged ≥65 years with first presentation of GSP treated either with (1) LC only, (2) ERCP-s, (3) ERCP-S followed by LC, or (4) no intervention.\u0000\u0000\u0000RESULTS\u0000216 patients were included. Median age was 76 years (interquartile range 70-83). Most (80%, n = 172) had mild pancreatitis, whilst 12% (n = 26) had severe disease. 24% (n = 55) were treated with ERCP-s; 40% (n = 87) underwent LC alone; 11% (n = 23) had ERCP-s followed by LC; and 25% (n = 55) received no intervention. Patients without intervention were older (P < .001) and frailer (P < .001). The LC-only group had lower post-procedure re-admission rates of 6% (n = 5) compared to 27% (n = 14) for ERCP-s, 33% (n = 7) for ERCP-S + LC, and 31% (n = 17) for the no intervention group (P = .0001). Biliary cause mortality was highest in the no intervention group (n = 11, 20%).\u0000\u0000\u0000CONCLUSION\u0000Laparoscopic cholecystectomy represents the gold standard for elderly patients with GSP.","PeriodicalId":325363,"journal":{"name":"The American Surgeon","volume":" 3","pages":"31348241248564"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140689211","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-18DOI: 10.1177/00031348241244628
T. Nakao, M. Shimada, K. Yoshikawa, T. Tokunaga, M. Nishi, H. Kashihara, C. Takasu, Y. Wada, T. Yoshimoto
BACKGROUND It has been reported that the oral and gut microbiomes are associated with the prognosis in patients who undergo surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation for colorectal cancer. This study is the first to identify a correlation between the number of healthy teeth, which is an oral health indicator, and the efficacy of preoperative chemotherapy for rectal cancer. METHODS This retrospective single-center study included 30 patients who underwent radical surgery after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) between December 2013 and June 2021. The relationship between number of teeth before CRT and the efficacy of CRT, CRT-related adverse events, postoperative complications, and long-term postoperative outcomes was examined. RESULTS The number of healthy teeth was significantly greater in patients with downstaging of their disease than in those without downstaging (P = .027) and in patients with a complete response according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors than in those who did not have a complete response (P = .014). Patients were divided into two groups according to whether they had ≥15 teeth or ≤14 teeth. There was no significant between-group difference in CRT-related adverse events. The incidence of all postoperative complications and grade II postoperative complications tended to be higher in patients with ≥15 teeth (P = .071 and P = .092, respectively), as did the 5-year overall survival rate (P = .083) and the 5-year disease-free rate (P = .007). DISCUSSION The number of healthy teeth predicted the response to preoperative CRT, postoperative complications, and the outcome of subsequent surgery in patients with rectal cancer.
{"title":"Number of Healthy Teeth Can Predict the Response of Rectal Cancer to Chemoradiotherapy: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"T. Nakao, M. Shimada, K. Yoshikawa, T. Tokunaga, M. Nishi, H. Kashihara, C. Takasu, Y. Wada, T. Yoshimoto","doi":"10.1177/00031348241244628","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348241244628","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\u0000It has been reported that the oral and gut microbiomes are associated with the prognosis in patients who undergo surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation for colorectal cancer. This study is the first to identify a correlation between the number of healthy teeth, which is an oral health indicator, and the efficacy of preoperative chemotherapy for rectal cancer.\u0000\u0000\u0000METHODS\u0000This retrospective single-center study included 30 patients who underwent radical surgery after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) between December 2013 and June 2021. The relationship between number of teeth before CRT and the efficacy of CRT, CRT-related adverse events, postoperative complications, and long-term postoperative outcomes was examined.\u0000\u0000\u0000RESULTS\u0000The number of healthy teeth was significantly greater in patients with downstaging of their disease than in those without downstaging (P = .027) and in patients with a complete response according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors than in those who did not have a complete response (P = .014). Patients were divided into two groups according to whether they had ≥15 teeth or ≤14 teeth. There was no significant between-group difference in CRT-related adverse events. The incidence of all postoperative complications and grade II postoperative complications tended to be higher in patients with ≥15 teeth (P = .071 and P = .092, respectively), as did the 5-year overall survival rate (P = .083) and the 5-year disease-free rate (P = .007).\u0000\u0000\u0000DISCUSSION\u0000The number of healthy teeth predicted the response to preoperative CRT, postoperative complications, and the outcome of subsequent surgery in patients with rectal cancer.","PeriodicalId":325363,"journal":{"name":"The American Surgeon","volume":" 3","pages":"31348241244628"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140689440","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-18DOI: 10.1177/00031348241248815
Monique Motta, Nikitha Garapaty, Margaret Savage, Joann Segarra, Shenae Samuels, Joshua P Parreco, Tamar Levene
Currently, there is no universally accepted, standardized protocol for pre-operative antibiotic administration in the setting of appendectomy for complicated appendicitis among pediatric patients. Strategies to mitigate surgical site infections (SSIs) must be balanced with optimal antibiotic use and exposure. We conducted a retrospective chart review to compare outcomes between patients treated pre-operatively with a single pre-operative dose of antibiotics with those who received additional antibiotics prior to laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis between 2020 and 2022. Of 124 pediatric patients, 18% received an additional dose of pre-operative antibiotics after initial treatment dose. Surgical site infection rates between the two groups were not statistically significant (P-value = .352), thereby suggesting that redosing antibiotics closer to the time of incision may not impact SSI rates. Additional studies are necessary to make clinical recommendations.
{"title":"The Impact of Redosing Antibiotics for Pediatric Patients Undergoing Appendectomy for Complicated Appendicitis.","authors":"Monique Motta, Nikitha Garapaty, Margaret Savage, Joann Segarra, Shenae Samuels, Joshua P Parreco, Tamar Levene","doi":"10.1177/00031348241248815","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348241248815","url":null,"abstract":"Currently, there is no universally accepted, standardized protocol for pre-operative antibiotic administration in the setting of appendectomy for complicated appendicitis among pediatric patients. Strategies to mitigate surgical site infections (SSIs) must be balanced with optimal antibiotic use and exposure. We conducted a retrospective chart review to compare outcomes between patients treated pre-operatively with a single pre-operative dose of antibiotics with those who received additional antibiotics prior to laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis between 2020 and 2022. Of 124 pediatric patients, 18% received an additional dose of pre-operative antibiotics after initial treatment dose. Surgical site infection rates between the two groups were not statistically significant (P-value = .352), thereby suggesting that redosing antibiotics closer to the time of incision may not impact SSI rates. Additional studies are necessary to make clinical recommendations.","PeriodicalId":325363,"journal":{"name":"The American Surgeon","volume":" 5","pages":"31348241248815"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140689318","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：