首页 > 最新文献

Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy最新文献

英文 中文
Clinico-epidemiological profile and outcome of infected health care workers during the three consecutive waves of COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal cohort study. 连续三波COVID-19大流行期间受感染医护人员的临床流行病学概况和结局:一项纵向队列研究
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/25151355231181744
Merrin Mathew, Juny Sebastian, Narayanappa Doddaiah, Anmaria Thomas, Sinchana Narayanappa

Background: Health care workers are considered as high-risk population, who deal with many unknown, undiagnosed, and subclinical infectious diseases in their daily life. Currently, the COVID-19 pandemic posed as an add-on burden for these frontline workers in all aspects. Although, many adverse physical and mental effects of pandemic among health care workers (HCWs) were discussed worldwide, a long-term study for delayed complications needed to be explored.

Aim: The study evaluates and compares three waves of the pandemic in various aspects such as the incidence, prevalence, severity, risk factors, and variations in the pattern of COVID-19 infection, impact of vaccination, and post-infection complications among the HCWs.

Methodology: A longitudinal observational study was carried out over a period of 2 years and another 6 months for follow-up. The study included all HCWs who tested positive in any one wave of COVID-19 pandemic with any one of the confirmed COVID-19 test. Each COVID-19-affected HCW was followed up through telephone calls and direct interviews conducted at the study site. Admission details and other background details of the study population were collected from the hospital records.

Results: A total of 968 HCWs were COVID-19 positive in any of the three waves, and highest incidence (53.00%) was caused by the Omicron variant. High severity and hospitalization was observed in the first wave (no vaccination) and fully immunized personnel were found to be out of danger of being hospitalized during all succeeding waves (chi-square value: 87.04, p < 0.05). Predictors such as female gender, occupational exposure, and comorbid status were identified as possible risk factors for infection. A total of 70 HCWs reported with 104 complications, of which chronic diseases such as new onset of diabetes (n = 3), cardiovascular events (n = 8), worsening of preexisting comorbidities (n = 8), etc. were found out.

Conclusions: This study proves the benefit of being immunized rather than the risk of being infected. This study documents that immunization impacted complication and hospitalization rates of COVID-19 infection. This evidence may help in tackling vaccine hesitancy across the nations.

背景:卫生保健工作者被认为是高危人群,他们在日常生活中要处理许多未知的、未诊断的、亚临床的传染病。当前,新冠肺炎疫情给一线工作者带来了方方面面的额外负担。虽然世界范围内讨论了大流行对卫生保健工作者(HCWs)的许多不利身心影响,但需要对迟发性并发症进行长期研究。目的:对三波新冠肺炎大流行的发生率、流行率、严重程度、危险因素、感染模式变化、疫苗接种影响、感染后并发症等方面进行评价和比较。方法:进行了为期2年的纵向观察研究和6个月的随访。该研究包括在任何一波COVID-19大流行中检测呈阳性的所有医护人员,其中包括任何一项确诊的COVID-19检测。通过电话和在研究现场进行的直接访谈,对每位受covid -19影响的HCW进行了随访。从医院记录中收集了研究人群的入院细节和其他背景细节。结果:三波共968例HCWs COVID-19阳性,其中Omicron变异发生率最高(53.00%)。在第一波(未接种疫苗)中观察到严重程度高且住院,在随后的所有波中发现充分免疫的人员没有住院危险(卡方值:87.04,p n = 3),心血管事件(n = 8),已有合并症恶化(n = 8)等。结论:这项研究证明了接种疫苗的好处而不是被感染的风险。本研究证明免疫接种影响COVID-19感染的并发症和住院率。这一证据可能有助于解决各国对疫苗的犹豫。
{"title":"Clinico-epidemiological profile and outcome of infected health care workers during the three consecutive waves of COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal cohort study.","authors":"Merrin Mathew,&nbsp;Juny Sebastian,&nbsp;Narayanappa Doddaiah,&nbsp;Anmaria Thomas,&nbsp;Sinchana Narayanappa","doi":"10.1177/25151355231181744","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25151355231181744","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health care workers are considered as high-risk population, who deal with many unknown, undiagnosed, and subclinical infectious diseases in their daily life. Currently, the COVID-19 pandemic posed as an add-on burden for these frontline workers in all aspects. Although, many adverse physical and mental effects of pandemic among health care workers (HCWs) were discussed worldwide, a long-term study for delayed complications needed to be explored.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The study evaluates and compares three waves of the pandemic in various aspects such as the incidence, prevalence, severity, risk factors, and variations in the pattern of COVID-19 infection, impact of vaccination, and post-infection complications among the HCWs.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A longitudinal observational study was carried out over a period of 2 years and another 6 months for follow-up. The study included all HCWs who tested positive in any one wave of COVID-19 pandemic with any one of the confirmed COVID-19 test. Each COVID-19-affected HCW was followed up through telephone calls and direct interviews conducted at the study site. Admission details and other background details of the study population were collected from the hospital records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 968 HCWs were COVID-19 positive in any of the three waves, and highest incidence (53.00%) was caused by the Omicron variant. High severity and hospitalization was observed in the first wave (no vaccination) and fully immunized personnel were found to be out of danger of being hospitalized during all succeeding waves (chi-square value: 87.04, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Predictors such as female gender, occupational exposure, and comorbid status were identified as possible risk factors for infection. A total of 70 HCWs reported with 104 complications, of which chronic diseases such as new onset of diabetes (<i>n</i> = 3), cardiovascular events (<i>n</i> = 8), worsening of preexisting comorbidities (<i>n</i> = 8), etc. were found out.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study proves the benefit of being immunized rather than the risk of being infected. This study documents that immunization impacted complication and hospitalization rates of COVID-19 infection. This evidence may help in tackling vaccine hesitancy across the nations.</p>","PeriodicalId":33285,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/19/d9/10.1177_25151355231181744.PMC10285439.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9716448","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Significant improvement of systemic lupus erythematosus manifestation in children after autologous dendritic cell transfer: a case report and review of literature. 自体树突状细胞移植后儿童系统性红斑狼疮症状显著改善1例报告及文献复习。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/25151355231186005
Jonny, Terawan Agus Putranto, Yenny Purnama, Roedi Djatmiko, Martina Lily Yana, Enda Cindylosa Sitepu, Raoulian Irfon

Dendritic cells (DC) are postulated to play a role in autoimmune diseases such as Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). We reported a 13-year-old female SLE patient who presents with chronic arthritis accompanied by persistent fever, dyspnea, sleep disturbance, headache, stomatitis, rash, and muscle weakness. The supporting examinations showed abnormal blood cell counts, positive antinuclear antibody profile, serositis, and neuropathy. Immunosuppressants failed to improve the condition. DC-based vaccine derived from autologous peripheral blood which was introduced with SARS-CoV-2 protein was given to this patient. There was a significant improvement in clinical and laboratory findings. Thus, DC immunotherapy appears to be a potential novel therapy for SLE that needs to be studied.

树突状细胞(DC)被认为在自身免疫性疾病如系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)中发挥作用。我们报告了一位13岁的SLE女性患者,她表现为慢性关节炎并伴有持续发烧、呼吸困难、睡眠障碍、头痛、口炎、皮疹和肌肉无力。辅助检查显示血细胞计数异常,抗核抗体阳性,血清炎和神经病变。免疫抑制剂未能改善病情。本例患者接种了经SARS-CoV-2蛋白引入的自体外周血dc基疫苗。临床和实验室检查结果均有显著改善。因此,DC免疫疗法似乎是一种潜在的SLE新疗法,需要进一步研究。
{"title":"Significant improvement of systemic lupus erythematosus manifestation in children after autologous dendritic cell transfer: a case report and review of literature.","authors":"Jonny,&nbsp;Terawan Agus Putranto,&nbsp;Yenny Purnama,&nbsp;Roedi Djatmiko,&nbsp;Martina Lily Yana,&nbsp;Enda Cindylosa Sitepu,&nbsp;Raoulian Irfon","doi":"10.1177/25151355231186005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25151355231186005","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dendritic cells (DC) are postulated to play a role in autoimmune diseases such as Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). We reported a 13-year-old female SLE patient who presents with chronic arthritis accompanied by persistent fever, dyspnea, sleep disturbance, headache, stomatitis, rash, and muscle weakness. The supporting examinations showed abnormal blood cell counts, positive antinuclear antibody profile, serositis, and neuropathy. Immunosuppressants failed to improve the condition. DC-based vaccine derived from autologous peripheral blood which was introduced with SARS-CoV-2 protein was given to this patient. There was a significant improvement in clinical and laboratory findings. Thus, DC immunotherapy appears to be a potential novel therapy for SLE that needs to be studied.</p>","PeriodicalId":33285,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/77/49/10.1177_25151355231186005.PMC10501061.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10672028","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
COVID-19 after rituximab therapy in cSLE patients. 利妥昔单抗治疗后cSLE患者的COVID-19
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/25151355231181242
Meghan Corrigan Nelson, Cynthia K Manos, Elaine Flanagan, Sampath Prahalad

Childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE) is an autoimmune disease associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Rituximab is a B-cell depleting therapy utilized in the treatment of SLE. In adults, rituximab has been associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes in patients who develop coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We aimed to assess the impact of prior rituximab treatment on clinical outcomes from Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in children with SLE. To describe the impact of rituximab on outcomes from SARS-CoV-2 infection, we conducted a retrospective study of pediatric SLE patients in our center diagnosed with COVID-19 who had previously received rituximab between February 2019 and October 2022. Patients' clinical characteristics, disease activity, and outcomes were assessed. Of the eight subjects assessed, five required hospitalizations for COVID-19, four required ICU admission, and two were seen in the emergency department for their symptoms. One patient ultimately expired from her illness. The median time between rituximab administration and COVID-19 diagnosis was 3 months. We assessed the clinical outcomes, including the need of ICU admission and fatal outcome, of COVID-19 in our cSLE patient population after rituximab administration. Approximately 60% of our patients required hospitalization for their illness, and seven out of eight patients required healthcare utilization to include hospitalization and/or emergency department visits.

儿童期发病的系统性红斑狼疮(cSLE)是一种与显著发病率和死亡率相关的自身免疫性疾病。利妥昔单抗是一种用于治疗SLE的b细胞消耗疗法。在成人中,利妥昔单抗与2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者不良后果风险增加有关。本研究旨在评估既往利妥昔单抗治疗对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)感染SLE患儿临床结局的影响。为了描述利妥昔单抗对SARS-CoV-2感染结局的影响,我们对本中心诊断为COVID-19的小儿SLE患者进行了回顾性研究,这些患者之前曾在2019年2月至2022年10月期间接受过利妥昔单抗治疗。评估患者的临床特征、疾病活动性和结果。在接受评估的8名受试者中,5名因COVID-19需要住院,4名需要ICU住院,2名因症状在急诊科就诊。一名患者最终因病去世。从给予利妥昔单抗到COVID-19诊断的中位时间为3个月。我们评估了使用利妥昔单抗后cSLE患者中COVID-19的临床结局,包括ICU住院的需要和致命结局。大约60%的患者需要住院治疗,8名患者中有7名需要医疗保健利用,包括住院和/或急诊室就诊。
{"title":"COVID-19 after rituximab therapy in cSLE patients.","authors":"Meghan Corrigan Nelson,&nbsp;Cynthia K Manos,&nbsp;Elaine Flanagan,&nbsp;Sampath Prahalad","doi":"10.1177/25151355231181242","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25151355231181242","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE) is an autoimmune disease associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Rituximab is a B-cell depleting therapy utilized in the treatment of SLE. In adults, rituximab has been associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes in patients who develop coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We aimed to assess the impact of prior rituximab treatment on clinical outcomes from Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in children with SLE. To describe the impact of rituximab on outcomes from SARS-CoV-2 infection, we conducted a retrospective study of pediatric SLE patients in our center diagnosed with COVID-19 who had previously received rituximab between February 2019 and October 2022. Patients' clinical characteristics, disease activity, and outcomes were assessed. Of the eight subjects assessed, five required hospitalizations for COVID-19, four required ICU admission, and two were seen in the emergency department for their symptoms. One patient ultimately expired from her illness. The median time between rituximab administration and COVID-19 diagnosis was 3 months. We assessed the clinical outcomes, including the need of ICU admission and fatal outcome, of COVID-19 in our cSLE patient population after rituximab administration. Approximately 60% of our patients required hospitalization for their illness, and seven out of eight patients required healthcare utilization to include hospitalization and/or emergency department visits.</p>","PeriodicalId":33285,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ff/98/10.1177_25151355231181242.PMC10285438.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10093945","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Immunogenicity and safety of vaccination in children with paediatric rheumatic diseases: a scoping review. 儿童风湿病疫苗接种的免疫原性和安全性:一项范围综述
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/25151355231167116
Jacqueline Cunninghame, Sophie Wen, Mitchell Dufficy, Amanda Ullman, Mari Takashima, Megan Cann, Rebecca Doyle

Children with paediatric rheumatic diseases (PRDs) are at increased risk of vaccine-preventable disease. Safe and effective vaccination is central to preventive care in PRD patients; however, uncertainty surrounding immunogenicity and safety has contributed to suboptimal vaccination. The aim of this study was to evaluate treatment effect on immunogenicity to vaccination in PRD patients and assess vaccine safety, specifically adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) and disease flare. Scoping review. In this scoping review, a systematic search of PubMed, CINAHL and Embase databases was conducted from 2014 to 23 August 2022 to identify observational studies evaluating the immunogenicity and safety of commonly used vaccinations in PRD patients. The primary outcome was immunogenicity (defined as seroprotection and protective antibody concentrations), with secondary outcomes describing AEFI and disease flare also extracted. Due to extensive heterogeneity related to diagnostic and vaccination variability, narrative synthesis was used to describe the findings of each study. Study quality was assessed via the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. The review was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022307212). The search yielded 19 studies evaluating immunogenicity to vaccination and incidence of AEFI and disease flares in this population, which were of acceptable quality. Corticosteroids did not have deleterious effects on vaccine response. Treatment with conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biologic DMARDs generally had no effect immunogenicity in PRD patients. While patients exhibited adequate seroprotection, protective antibody levels were lower in patients on some immunosuppressant agents. Varicella infections were recorded post vaccination in several patients with low protective antibody levels undergoing treatment with DMARDs and corticosteroids. Most vaccines appear safe and effective in PRD patients, despite immunosuppressant treatment. Booster vaccinations should be considered with some studies highlighting inadequate seroprotection following primary course of vaccinations with acceleration of antibody decline over time. There was limited evidence to support avoiding live vaccines in PRD patients.

患有儿科风湿病的儿童患疫苗可预防疾病的风险增加。安全有效的疫苗接种对珠三角患者的预防保健至关重要;然而,围绕免疫原性和安全性的不确定性导致了次优疫苗接种。本研究的目的是评估PRD患者接种疫苗对免疫原性的治疗效果,并评估疫苗安全性,特别是免疫后不良事件(AEFI)和疾病爆发。确定审核范围。在这一范围综述中,从2014年到2022年8月23日,对PubMed、CINAHL和Embase数据库进行了系统检索,以确定评估PRD患者常用疫苗免疫原性和安全性的观察性研究。主要结局是免疫原性(定义为血清保护和保护性抗体浓度),次要结局描述AEFI和疾病爆发。由于与诊断和疫苗可变性相关的广泛异质性,采用叙述性综合来描述每项研究的结果。通过混合方法评估工具评估研究质量。该综述在PROSPERO进行了前瞻性注册(CRD42022307212)。我们检索了19项研究,这些研究评估了该人群对疫苗的免疫原性、AEFI发生率和疾病发作,质量可接受。皮质类固醇对疫苗反应没有有害影响。常规抗风湿药物(DMARDs)和生物DMARDs治疗对PRD患者的免疫原性无明显影响。虽然患者表现出足够的血清保护,但使用某些免疫抑制剂的患者的保护性抗体水平较低。在一些接受DMARDs和皮质类固醇治疗的低保护性抗体水平患者中,接种疫苗后记录了水痘感染。尽管进行了免疫抑制治疗,大多数疫苗对PRD患者似乎是安全有效的。应考虑加强疫苗接种,因为一些研究强调初级疫苗接种后血清保护不足,随着时间的推移,抗体下降会加速。支持在PRD患者中避免使用活疫苗的证据有限。
{"title":"Immunogenicity and safety of vaccination in children with paediatric rheumatic diseases: a scoping review.","authors":"Jacqueline Cunninghame,&nbsp;Sophie Wen,&nbsp;Mitchell Dufficy,&nbsp;Amanda Ullman,&nbsp;Mari Takashima,&nbsp;Megan Cann,&nbsp;Rebecca Doyle","doi":"10.1177/25151355231167116","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25151355231167116","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Children with paediatric rheumatic diseases (PRDs) are at increased risk of vaccine-preventable disease. Safe and effective vaccination is central to preventive care in PRD patients; however, uncertainty surrounding immunogenicity and safety has contributed to suboptimal vaccination. The aim of this study was to evaluate treatment effect on immunogenicity to vaccination in PRD patients and assess vaccine safety, specifically adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) and disease flare. Scoping review. In this scoping review, a systematic search of PubMed, CINAHL and Embase databases was conducted from 2014 to 23 August 2022 to identify observational studies evaluating the immunogenicity and safety of commonly used vaccinations in PRD patients. The primary outcome was immunogenicity (defined as seroprotection and protective antibody concentrations), with secondary outcomes describing AEFI and disease flare also extracted. Due to extensive heterogeneity related to diagnostic and vaccination variability, narrative synthesis was used to describe the findings of each study. Study quality was assessed via the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. The review was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022307212). The search yielded 19 studies evaluating immunogenicity to vaccination and incidence of AEFI and disease flares in this population, which were of acceptable quality. Corticosteroids did not have deleterious effects on vaccine response. Treatment with conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biologic DMARDs generally had no effect immunogenicity in PRD patients. While patients exhibited adequate seroprotection, protective antibody levels were lower in patients on some immunosuppressant agents. Varicella infections were recorded post vaccination in several patients with low protective antibody levels undergoing treatment with DMARDs and corticosteroids. Most vaccines appear safe and effective in PRD patients, despite immunosuppressant treatment. Booster vaccinations should be considered with some studies highlighting inadequate seroprotection following primary course of vaccinations with acceleration of antibody decline over time. There was limited evidence to support avoiding live vaccines in PRD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":33285,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10131534/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9387113","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Immune checkpoints and cancer immunotherapies: insights into newly potential receptors and ligands. 免疫检查点和癌症免疫疗法:对新的潜在受体和配体的见解。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/25151355231192043
Ali N Kamali, José M Bautista, Michael Eisenhut, Haleh Hamedifar

Checkpoint markers and immune checkpoint inhibitors have been increasingly identified and developed as potential immunotherapeutic targets in various human cancers. Despite valuable efforts to discover novel immune checkpoints and their ligands, the precise roles of their therapeutic functions, as well as the broad identification of their counterpart receptors, remain to be addressed. In this context, it has been suggested that various putative checkpoint receptors can be induced upon activation. In the tumor microenvironment, T cells, as crucial immune response against malignant diseases as well as other immune central effector cells, such as natural killer cells, are regulated via co-stimulatory or co-inhibitory signals from immune or tumor cells. Studies have shown that exposure of T cells to tumor antigens upregulates the expression of inhibitory checkpoint receptors, leading to T-cell dysfunction or exhaustion. Although targeting immune checkpoint regulators has shown relative clinical efficacy in some tumor types, most trials in the field of cancer immunotherapies have revealed unsatisfactory results due to de novo or adaptive resistance in cancer patients. To overcome these obstacles, combinational therapies with newly discovered inhibitory molecules or combined blockage of several checkpoints provide a rationale for further research. Moreover, precise identification of their receptors counterparts at crucial checkpoints is likely to promise effective therapies. In this review, we examine the prospects for the application of newly emerging checkpoints, such as T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain 3, lymphocyte activation gene-3, T-cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains (TIGIT), V-domain Ig suppressor of T-cell activation (VISTA), new B7 family proteins, and B- and T-cell lymphocyte attenuator, in association with immunotherapy of malignancies. In addition, their clinical and biological significance is discussed, including their expression in various human cancers, along with their roles in T-cell-mediated immune responses.

检查点标记物和免疫检查点抑制剂作为潜在的免疫治疗靶点在各种人类癌症中得到越来越多的发现和发展。尽管在发现新的免疫检查点及其配体方面付出了宝贵的努力,但其治疗功能的确切作用以及对其对应受体的广泛鉴定仍有待解决。在这种情况下,已经提出各种假定的检查点受体在激活后可以被诱导。在肿瘤微环境中,T细胞作为对抗恶性疾病的重要免疫应答细胞,以及其他免疫中枢效应细胞,如自然杀伤细胞,通过来自免疫细胞或肿瘤细胞的共刺激或共抑制信号进行调节。研究表明,T细胞暴露于肿瘤抗原会上调抑制性检查点受体的表达,导致T细胞功能障碍或衰竭。尽管靶向免疫检查点调节剂在某些肿瘤类型中显示出相对的临床疗效,但由于癌症患者的新生或适应性耐药,大多数癌症免疫治疗领域的试验结果并不令人满意。为了克服这些障碍,使用新发现的抑制分子或联合阻断几个检查点的联合治疗为进一步的研究提供了基础。此外,在关键检查点精确识别它们的受体对应物可能会带来有效的治疗。在这篇综述中,我们研究了新出现的检查点的应用前景,如t细胞免疫球蛋白和黏液蛋白结构域3,淋巴细胞活化基因-3,具有Ig和ITIM结构域的t细胞免疫受体(TIGIT), t细胞活化的v结构域Ig抑制因子(VISTA),新的B7家族蛋白,以及B和t细胞淋巴细胞减毒剂,与恶性肿瘤的免疫治疗相关。此外,还讨论了它们的临床和生物学意义,包括它们在各种人类癌症中的表达,以及它们在t细胞介导的免疫反应中的作用。
{"title":"Immune checkpoints and cancer immunotherapies: insights into newly potential receptors and ligands.","authors":"Ali N Kamali,&nbsp;José M Bautista,&nbsp;Michael Eisenhut,&nbsp;Haleh Hamedifar","doi":"10.1177/25151355231192043","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25151355231192043","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Checkpoint markers and immune checkpoint inhibitors have been increasingly identified and developed as potential immunotherapeutic targets in various human cancers. Despite valuable efforts to discover novel immune checkpoints and their ligands, the precise roles of their therapeutic functions, as well as the broad identification of their counterpart receptors, remain to be addressed. In this context, it has been suggested that various putative checkpoint receptors can be induced upon activation. In the tumor microenvironment, T cells, as crucial immune response against malignant diseases as well as other immune central effector cells, such as natural killer cells, are regulated <i>via</i> co-stimulatory or co-inhibitory signals from immune or tumor cells. Studies have shown that exposure of T cells to tumor antigens upregulates the expression of inhibitory checkpoint receptors, leading to T-cell dysfunction or exhaustion. Although targeting immune checkpoint regulators has shown relative clinical efficacy in some tumor types, most trials in the field of cancer immunotherapies have revealed unsatisfactory results due to <i>de novo</i> or adaptive resistance in cancer patients. To overcome these obstacles, combinational therapies with newly discovered inhibitory molecules or combined blockage of several checkpoints provide a rationale for further research. Moreover, precise identification of their receptors counterparts at crucial checkpoints is likely to promise effective therapies. In this review, we examine the prospects for the application of newly emerging checkpoints, such as T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain 3, lymphocyte activation gene-3, T-cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains (TIGIT), V-domain Ig suppressor of T-cell activation (VISTA), new B7 family proteins, and B- and T-cell lymphocyte attenuator, in association with immunotherapy of malignancies. In addition, their clinical and biological significance is discussed, including their expression in various human cancers, along with their roles in T-cell-mediated immune responses.</p>","PeriodicalId":33285,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/26/9a/10.1177_25151355231192043.PMC10469281.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10154206","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Active surveillance of adverse events following COVID-19 vaccines in a tertiary care hospital. 三级保健医院COVID-19疫苗接种后不良事件的主动监测
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/25151355231193975
Naveena Mary Cherian, Dravya Anna Durai, Muhammed Jaisel, Divyansh Sharma, Juny Sebastian, Chetak Kadabasal Basavaraja, Merrin Mathew

Background: Vaccination is a safe and effective way to prevent disease and save lives, but it may also produce some undesirable adverse events (AEs)which may affect healthy individuals. Therefore, the monitoring of AE following immunization (AEFIs) is necessary. The objective of this study was to assess the AEs following COVID-19 vaccinations in a tertiary care hospital.

Methodology: The study was conducted as active vaccine safety surveillance for a period of 6 months among the COVID-19 vaccine beneficiaries of the study site. Active surveillance was conducted via initiating two telephone contacts. The first surveillance was conducted in 8 days and the second surveillance after 28 days of post-vaccination. All identified AEs following immunizations (AEFIs) were reported and analysed by the AEFI investigation team at the study site. The causality assessment of each identified AEFI was performed using the World Health Organization's causality assessment algorithm.

Results: A total of 2927 enrolled study population completed the study with a response rate of 80.85%. The study identified 902 AEFIs from 614 study populations with an incidence rate of 20.97%. Of which 794 and 79 AEFIs were associated with COVISHIELD™ and COVAXIN®, respectively. The majority of the events were reported among the age group of 18-29 years. Overall, only three events were serious and no deaths were reported among the study population. A total of 75.59% of events had a consistent causal association with vaccination and were categorized as vaccine product-related reactions. The study identified various factors such as gender (p = 0.019), age (p < 0.05), co-morbid status (p = 0.032) and dose number (p = 0.001) as potential predictors for development of AEFI.

Conclusion: The study identified only 0.33% of events as serious, and 99.67% of the study population recovered from the AEFIs, which reveals that COVISHIELD™ and COVAXIN® have a generally favourable safety profile. However, close monitoring is required to identify the potential signals, as the safety data from the clinical trials are limited.

背景:疫苗接种是一种安全有效的预防疾病和挽救生命的方法,但它也可能产生一些不良事件(ae),可能影响健康个体。因此,有必要对免疫后AE进行监测。本研究的目的是评估三级保健医院COVID-19疫苗接种后的不良反应。方法:在研究地点的COVID-19疫苗受益人中进行为期6个月的主动疫苗安全性监测。通过启动两个电话联系人进行了主动监视。第一次监测在接种后8天进行,第二次监测在接种后28天进行。所有确定的免疫后不良反应(AEFI)由研究现场的AEFI调查小组报告和分析。使用世界卫生组织的因果关系评估算法对每个确定的AEFI进行因果关系评估。结果:共有2927名入组研究人群完成了研究,有效率为80.85%。该研究从614个研究人群中确定了902例aefi,发病率为20.97%。其中794和79个aefi分别与COVISHIELD™和COVAXIN®相关。报告的大多数事件发生在18-29岁年龄组。总的来说,在研究人群中只有三起事件是严重的,没有死亡报告。共有75.59%的事件与疫苗接种有一致的因果关系,并被归类为疫苗产品相关反应。该研究确定了性别(p = 0.019)、年龄(p = 0.032)和剂量(p = 0.001)等各种因素作为AEFI发展的潜在预测因素。结论:该研究仅鉴定出0.33%的事件为严重事件,99.67%的研究人群从aefi中恢复,这表明COVISHIELD™和COVAXIN®具有普遍有利的安全性。然而,由于临床试验的安全性数据有限,需要密切监测以识别潜在信号。
{"title":"Active surveillance of adverse events following COVID-19 vaccines in a tertiary care hospital.","authors":"Naveena Mary Cherian,&nbsp;Dravya Anna Durai,&nbsp;Muhammed Jaisel,&nbsp;Divyansh Sharma,&nbsp;Juny Sebastian,&nbsp;Chetak Kadabasal Basavaraja,&nbsp;Merrin Mathew","doi":"10.1177/25151355231193975","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25151355231193975","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vaccination is a safe and effective way to prevent disease and save lives, but it may also produce some undesirable adverse events (AEs)which may affect healthy individuals. Therefore, the monitoring of AE following immunization (AEFIs) is necessary. The objective of this study was to assess the AEs following COVID-19 vaccinations in a tertiary care hospital.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The study was conducted as active vaccine safety surveillance for a period of 6 months among the COVID-19 vaccine beneficiaries of the study site. Active surveillance was conducted <i>via</i> initiating two telephone contacts. The first surveillance was conducted in 8 days and the second surveillance after 28 days of post-vaccination. All identified AEs following immunizations (AEFIs) were reported and analysed by the AEFI investigation team at the study site. The causality assessment of each identified AEFI was performed using the World Health Organization's causality assessment algorithm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2927 enrolled study population completed the study with a response rate of 80.85%. The study identified 902 AEFIs from 614 study populations with an incidence rate of 20.97%. Of which 794 and 79 AEFIs were associated with COVISHIELD™ and COVAXIN<sup>®</sup>, respectively. The majority of the events were reported among the age group of 18-29 years. Overall, only three events were serious and no deaths were reported among the study population. A total of 75.59% of events had a consistent causal association with vaccination and were categorized as vaccine product-related reactions. The study identified various factors such as gender (<i>p</i> = 0.019), age (<i>p</i> < 0.05), co-morbid status (<i>p</i> = 0.032) and dose number (<i>p</i> = 0.001) as potential predictors for development of AEFI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study identified only 0.33% of events as serious, and 99.67% of the study population recovered from the AEFIs, which reveals that COVISHIELD™ and COVAXIN<sup>®</sup> have a generally favourable safety profile. However, close monitoring is required to identify the potential signals, as the safety data from the clinical trials are limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":33285,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/db/dd/10.1177_25151355231193975.PMC10460577.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10466751","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
COVID-19 vaccine immune response in patients with plasma cell dyscrasia: a systematic review. 浆细胞病变患者COVID-19疫苗免疫反应的系统评价
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/25151355231190497
Unaiza Faizan, Lakshmi G Nair, Maroun Bou Zerdan, Majid Jaberi-Douraki, Faiz Anwer, Shahzad Raza

Background: Patients with plasma cell dyscrasia are at a higher risk of developing a severe Coronavirus-2019 (COVID-19) infection. Here we present a systematic review of clinical studies focusing on the immune response to the COVID-19 vaccination in patients with plasma cell dyscrasia.

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the immune response to COVID-19 vaccines in patients with plasma cell dyscrasia and to utilize the results to improve day-to-day practice.

Design: Systematic Review.

Methods: Online databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Ovid, and Cochrane) were searched following the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Only articles published in the English language were included. Out of 59 studies, nine articles (seven prospective and two retrospective studies) were included in this systematic review. Abstracts, case reports, and case series were excluded.

Results: In all nine studies (N = 1429), seroconversion post-vaccination was the primary endpoint. Patients with plasma cell disorders had a lower seroconversion rate compared to healthy vaccinated individuals and the overall percentage of seroconversion ranged between 23% and 95.5%. Among patients on active therapy, lower seroconversion rates were seen on an anti-CD38 agent, ranging from 6.5 up to 100%. In addition, a significantly lower percentage was recorded in older patients, especially in those aged equal to or greater than 65 years and those who have been treated with multiple therapies previously. Only one study reported a statistically significant better humoral response rate with the mRNA vaccine compared to ADZ1222/Ad26.Cov.S.

Conclusion: Variable seropositive rates are seen in patients with plasma cell dyscrasia. Lower rates are reported in patients on active therapy, anti-CD38 therapy, and elderly patients. Hence, we propose patients with plasma cell dyscrasias should receive periodic boosters to maintain clinically significant levels of antibodies against COVID-19.

Registration: PROSPERO ID: CRD42023404989.

背景:浆细胞病变患者发生严重冠状病毒2019 (COVID-19)感染的风险较高。在此,我们对浆细胞病变患者对COVID-19疫苗接种的免疫反应的临床研究进行了系统回顾。目的:本研究旨在评估血浆细胞增生患者对COVID-19疫苗的免疫反应,并利用结果改进日常实践。设计:系统评价。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目检索在线数据库(PubMed、CINAHL、Ovid和Cochrane)。只包括以英文发表的文章。在59项研究中,9篇文章(7篇前瞻性研究和2篇回顾性研究)被纳入本系统综述。摘要、病例报告和病例系列被排除在外。结果:在所有9项研究(N = 1429)中,疫苗接种后血清转化是主要终点。与健康接种疫苗的个体相比,浆细胞疾病患者的血清转换率较低,血清转换率的总体百分比在23%至95.5%之间。在接受积极治疗的患者中,抗cd38药物的血清转换率较低,从6.5到100%不等。此外,在老年患者中记录的百分比显着降低,特别是在年龄等于或大于65岁的患者和以前接受过多种治疗的患者中。只有一项研究报告了mRNA疫苗与ADZ1222/Ad26.Cov.S相比具有统计学意义的更好的体液应答率。结论:浆细胞病变患者血清阳性率存在差异。据报道,积极治疗、抗cd38治疗和老年患者的发病率较低。因此,我们建议浆细胞异常患者应定期接受增强剂,以维持临床显著的COVID-19抗体水平。注册:PROSPERO ID: CRD42023404989。
{"title":"COVID-19 vaccine immune response in patients with plasma cell dyscrasia: a systematic review.","authors":"Unaiza Faizan,&nbsp;Lakshmi G Nair,&nbsp;Maroun Bou Zerdan,&nbsp;Majid Jaberi-Douraki,&nbsp;Faiz Anwer,&nbsp;Shahzad Raza","doi":"10.1177/25151355231190497","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25151355231190497","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with plasma cell dyscrasia are at a higher risk of developing a severe Coronavirus-2019 (COVID-19) infection. Here we present a systematic review of clinical studies focusing on the immune response to the COVID-19 vaccination in patients with plasma cell dyscrasia.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the immune response to COVID-19 vaccines in patients with plasma cell dyscrasia and to utilize the results to improve day-to-day practice.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic Review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Online databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Ovid, and Cochrane) were searched following the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Only articles published in the English language were included. Out of 59 studies, nine articles (seven prospective and two retrospective studies) were included in this systematic review. Abstracts, case reports, and case series were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all nine studies (<i>N</i> = 1429), seroconversion post-vaccination was the primary endpoint. Patients with plasma cell disorders had a lower seroconversion rate compared to healthy vaccinated individuals and the overall percentage of seroconversion ranged between 23% and 95.5%. Among patients on active therapy, lower seroconversion rates were seen on an anti-CD38 agent, ranging from 6.5 up to 100%. In addition, a significantly lower percentage was recorded in older patients, especially in those aged equal to or greater than 65 years and those who have been treated with multiple therapies previously. Only one study reported a statistically significant better humoral response rate with the mRNA vaccine compared to ADZ1222/Ad26.Cov.S.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Variable seropositive rates are seen in patients with plasma cell dyscrasia. Lower rates are reported in patients on active therapy, anti-CD38 therapy, and elderly patients. Hence, we propose patients with plasma cell dyscrasias should receive periodic boosters to maintain clinically significant levels of antibodies against COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>PROSPERO ID: CRD42023404989.</p>","PeriodicalId":33285,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/48/52/10.1177_25151355231190497.PMC10461737.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10120545","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and its determinants among residents of Ambo Town, West Shewa, Oromia Region, Ethiopia: cross-sectional survey. 埃塞俄比亚奥罗米亚地区西谢瓦安博镇居民COVID-19疫苗接受情况及其决定因素:横断面调查
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/25151355231178150
Tamirat Bekele Beressa, Milkessa Tafa, Gudeta Duga Geresu, Amente Jorise Bacha, Diriba Alemayehu Gadisa

Background: Vaccines against COVID-19 are critical for preventing and managing COVID-19 because immunization is one of the most active and cost-effective health strategies for infectious disease prevention. Knowing the community's willingness and factors affecting COVID-19 vaccine acceptance will support the design of effective promotion strategies. Therefore, this study was aimed at assessing COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and its determinants among the Ambo Town community.

Method: A community-based, cross-sectional study was conducted using structured questionnaires from 1 to 28 February 2022. Four kebeles were selected randomly, and the systematic random sampling procedure was used to select the households. SPSS-25 software was used for data analysis. Ethical approval was received from the Institutional Review Committee of the College of Medicine and Health Sciences of Ambo University, and data were kept confidential.

Result: Of the 391 participants, 385 (98.5%) of the respondents were not vaccinated for COVID-19, and around 126 (32.2%) of the respondents said that they would receive the vaccine if the government provided it. The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that males were 1.8 times more likely to accept the COVID-19 vaccine (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.8, 95% CI: 1.074-3.156) as compared to females. The acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine was lower by 60% in those who tested for COVID-19 as compared to those who were not tested (AOR = 0.4, 95% CI: 0.27-0.69). Moreover, the participants who had chronic diseases were two times more likely to accept the vaccine. Acceptance of the vaccine was reduced by half among those who believed that there was a scarcity of data on its safety (AOR = 0.5, 95% CI: 0.26-0.80).

Conclusion: The prevalence of COVID-19 vaccination acceptance was low. To enhance the acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine, the government and different stakeholders should strengthen public education using mass media about the advantages of getting the COVID-19 vaccination.

背景:COVID-19疫苗对于预防和管理COVID-19至关重要,因为免疫接种是预防传染病最积极和最具成本效益的卫生战略之一。了解社区的意愿和影响COVID-19疫苗接受的因素将有助于制定有效的推广策略。因此,本研究旨在评估Ambo镇社区的COVID-19疫苗接受度及其决定因素。方法:于2022年2月1日至28日采用结构化问卷进行基于社区的横断面研究。随机选取4户家庭,采用系统随机抽样方法进行住户选择。采用SPSS-25软件进行数据分析。获得安博大学医学与健康科学学院机构审查委员会的伦理批准,数据保密。结果:在391名调查对象中,385名(98.5%)人没有接种疫苗,126名(32.2%)人表示,如果政府提供疫苗,他们将接种疫苗。多因素logistic回归分析显示,男性接受新冠肺炎疫苗的可能性是女性的1.8倍(调整优势比(AOR) = 1.8, 95% CI: 1.074 ~ 3.156)。与未接受COVID-19检测的患者相比,接受COVID-19疫苗的患者降低了60% (AOR = 0.4, 95% CI: 0.27-0.69)。此外,患有慢性疾病的参与者接受疫苗的可能性是其他参与者的两倍。在那些认为缺乏安全性数据的人群中,接受疫苗的人数减少了一半(AOR = 0.5, 95% CI: 0.26-0.80)。结论:新冠肺炎疫苗接种率较低。为了提高新冠肺炎疫苗的接受度,政府和不同利益相关者应利用大众媒体加强公众教育,宣传接种新冠肺炎疫苗的好处。
{"title":"COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and its determinants among residents of Ambo Town, West Shewa, Oromia Region, Ethiopia: cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Tamirat Bekele Beressa,&nbsp;Milkessa Tafa,&nbsp;Gudeta Duga Geresu,&nbsp;Amente Jorise Bacha,&nbsp;Diriba Alemayehu Gadisa","doi":"10.1177/25151355231178150","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25151355231178150","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vaccines against COVID-19 are critical for preventing and managing COVID-19 because immunization is one of the most active and cost-effective health strategies for infectious disease prevention. Knowing the community's willingness and factors affecting COVID-19 vaccine acceptance will support the design of effective promotion strategies. Therefore, this study was aimed at assessing COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and its determinants among the Ambo Town community.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A community-based, cross-sectional study was conducted using structured questionnaires from 1 to 28 February 2022. Four kebeles were selected randomly, and the systematic random sampling procedure was used to select the households. SPSS-25 software was used for data analysis. Ethical approval was received from the Institutional Review Committee of the College of Medicine and Health Sciences of Ambo University, and data were kept confidential.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Of the 391 participants, 385 (98.5%) of the respondents were not vaccinated for COVID-19, and around 126 (32.2%) of the respondents said that they would receive the vaccine if the government provided it. The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that males were 1.8 times more likely to accept the COVID-19 vaccine (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.8, 95% CI: 1.074-3.156) as compared to females. The acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine was lower by 60% in those who tested for COVID-19 as compared to those who were not tested (AOR = 0.4, 95% CI: 0.27-0.69). Moreover, the participants who had chronic diseases were two times more likely to accept the vaccine. Acceptance of the vaccine was reduced by half among those who believed that there was a scarcity of data on its safety (AOR = 0.5, 95% CI: 0.26-0.80).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prevalence of COVID-19 vaccination acceptance was low. To enhance the acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine, the government and different stakeholders should strengthen public education using mass media about the advantages of getting the COVID-19 vaccination.</p>","PeriodicalId":33285,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3c/f7/10.1177_25151355231178150.PMC10291218.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9717591","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Influenza vaccination coverage rates and other related factors in high-risk groups in Birjand, East of Iran. 伊朗东部Birjand高危人群的流感疫苗接种覆盖率和其他相关因素。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-11-26 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/25151355221140229
Azadeh Ebrahimzadeh, Bita Bijari, Amin Azarnoosh, Fatemeh Shakhs Emampour

Background and aims: Influenza is an acute respiratory disease with the highest mortality rate in the high-risk groups. Vaccination is a key public health strategy to prevent influenza in high-risk people. This study aimed to assess the influenza vaccination coverage rate and identify its demographic determinants in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and diabetes in Birjand, Eastern Iran.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included 400 patients (300 diabetic, 60 dialysis, and 40 COPD patients) from September 2017 to August 2018. Using interview method, we completed a questionnaire containing the patients' demographic characteristics, questions about patients' knowledge and attitude toward influenza vaccination, the influenza vaccination history, and the most common causes for vaccination. The relationship between the type of disease and patients' characteristics (exposure) with vaccination coverage (outcome) was investigated.

Results: The mean age of participants was 58.7 ± 11.3 years. Also, 58.8% of the patients received at least one dose of the vaccine and the regular injection rate was 32.8%. The coverage of influenza vaccine in dialysis patients was significantly higher than other patients (p < 0.001). The mean knowledge score was 6.17 ± 2.15 out of maximum 9 scores. There was a positive association between age [p = 0.001, odds ratio (OR) = 1.04] and patients' knowledge (p < 0.001, OR = 1.42) with the vaccination coverage.

Conclusion: The coverage of influenza vaccine in high-risk patients in Birjand was low. Hence, it is essential to increase the knowledge of high-risk groups about the importance of influenza vaccination and facilitate their access to vaccines.

背景和目的:流感是高危人群中死亡率最高的一种急性呼吸道疾病。疫苗接种是在高危人群中预防流感的一项关键公共卫生战略。本研究旨在评估伊朗东部Birjand地区终末期肾病(ESRD)、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)和糖尿病患者的流感疫苗接种覆盖率,并确定其人口统计学决定因素。方法:本横断面研究纳入了2017年9月至2018年8月的400例患者(300例糖尿病患者,60例透析患者和40例COPD患者)。采用访谈法,对患者的人口学特征、对流感疫苗接种的知识和态度、流感疫苗接种史、最常见的疫苗接种原因进行问卷调查。调查了疾病类型和患者特征(暴露)与疫苗接种覆盖率(结果)之间的关系。结果:参与者平均年龄58.7±11.3岁。此外,58.8%的患者至少接种了一剂疫苗,常规注射率为32.8%。透析患者流感疫苗接种率显著高于其他患者(p p = 0.001,优势比(OR) = 1.04),且患者对流感疫苗的了解程度显著高于其他患者(p p = 0.001, OR = 1.04)。因此,必须提高高危人群对流感疫苗接种重要性的认识,并便利他们获得疫苗。
{"title":"Influenza vaccination coverage rates and other related factors in high-risk groups in Birjand, East of Iran.","authors":"Azadeh Ebrahimzadeh,&nbsp;Bita Bijari,&nbsp;Amin Azarnoosh,&nbsp;Fatemeh Shakhs Emampour","doi":"10.1177/25151355221140229","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25151355221140229","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Influenza is an acute respiratory disease with the highest mortality rate in the high-risk groups. Vaccination is a key public health strategy to prevent influenza in high-risk people. This study aimed to assess the influenza vaccination coverage rate and identify its demographic determinants in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and diabetes in Birjand, Eastern Iran.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 400 patients (300 diabetic, 60 dialysis, and 40 COPD patients) from September 2017 to August 2018. Using interview method, we completed a questionnaire containing the patients' demographic characteristics, questions about patients' knowledge and attitude toward influenza vaccination, the influenza vaccination history, and the most common causes for vaccination. The relationship between the type of disease and patients' characteristics (exposure) with vaccination coverage (outcome) was investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of participants was 58.7 ± 11.3 years. Also, 58.8% of the patients received at least one dose of the vaccine and the regular injection rate was 32.8%. The coverage of influenza vaccine in dialysis patients was significantly higher than other patients (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The mean knowledge score was 6.17 ± 2.15 out of maximum 9 scores. There was a positive association between age [<i>p</i> = 0.001, odds ratio (OR) = 1.04] and patients' knowledge (<i>p</i> < 0.001, OR = 1.42) with the vaccination coverage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The coverage of influenza vaccine in high-risk patients in Birjand was low. Hence, it is essential to increase the knowledge of high-risk groups about the importance of influenza vaccination and facilitate their access to vaccines.</p>","PeriodicalId":33285,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/65/2c/10.1177_25151355221140229.PMC9703479.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40723215","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Third wave COVID-19 delta variant breakthrough infection in a Hispanic-dominant suburb of Miami, Florida: ethical dilemma and vaccination hesitancy. 在佛罗里达州迈阿密以西班牙裔为主的郊区发生的第三波COVID-19三角洲变体突破性感染:伦理困境和疫苗接种犹豫
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-10-08 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/25151355221128086
Sam Kara, Gavrilo Lazovic, Farah Chohan, Jannel A Lawrence, Mahnoor Sukaina, Omoyeme Edaki, Kester Nedd

Background and aims: The peak of the third wave of COVID-19 infection was in the summer (August-September) of 2021, dominated by the Delta variant. Florida was the epicenter of the third wave with more than 151,449 cases in the first week of August with a positivity rate of 20%. The purpose of this study is to identify the percentage of COVID-19 infection in vaccinated patients in a minority population in south Florida and to elucidate the relationship, if any, between demographics and breakthrough infections, the rate of vaccine hesitancy, as well as the willingness to receive the monoclonal antibody REGEN-COV for the treatment of COVID-19.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed at the Emergency Department, Larkin Community Hospital Palm Spring Campus, located in Hialeah, the fourth largest city in Florida. Hialeah is dominated (94.7%) by Hispanics and Latinos. This city represents a cross-sectional sample of US cities in general and Florida in specific. We enrolled 127 COVID-19 PCR-positive patients.

Results: The infection in vaccinated patients (breakthrough) was found to be about one in three (34%). Despite the high infection rate and mounting death toll, about 73% of our unvaccinated patients answered no to the question 'knowing the consequences of being infected with COVID-19 and the fact that you are positive, would you have chosen to be vaccinated earlier?' However, about 27% of these patients agreed to receive the vaccine and 20.5% received the monoclonal antibody REGEN-COV.

Conclusions: Our study revealed that vaccine hesitancy in South Florida continues to be a major challenge, especially with the emergence of mutations including Delta plus and Omicron.

背景与目的:第三波COVID-19感染高峰出现在2021年夏季(8 - 9月),以Delta型为主。佛罗里达州是第三波疫情的中心,8月第一周确诊病例超过151449例,阳性率为20%。本研究的目的是确定南佛罗里达州少数民族人群中接种疫苗的患者中COVID-19感染的百分比,并阐明人口统计学与突破性感染、疫苗犹豫率以及接受单克隆抗体REGEN-COV治疗COVID-19的意愿之间的关系(如果有的话)。方法:本横断面研究在位于佛罗里达州第四大城市海厄利亚的拉金社区医院棕榈泉校区急诊科进行。海厄利亚以西班牙裔和拉丁裔为主(94.7%)。这个城市代表了美国城市的横截面样本,特别是佛罗里达州。我们招募了127名COVID-19 pcr阳性患者。结果:接种者感染(突破)约占1 / 3(34%)。尽管感染率很高,死亡人数不断上升,但在“知道感染COVID-19的后果以及你呈阳性的事实,你会选择更早接种疫苗吗?”这个问题上,约73%未接种疫苗的患者回答“不”。然而,这些患者中约有27%同意接种疫苗,20.5%接受了单克隆抗体REGEN-COV。结论:我们的研究表明,南佛罗里达州的疫苗犹豫仍然是一个主要挑战,特别是随着Delta +和Omicron等突变的出现。
{"title":"Third wave COVID-19 delta variant breakthrough infection in a Hispanic-dominant suburb of Miami, Florida: ethical dilemma and vaccination hesitancy.","authors":"Sam Kara,&nbsp;Gavrilo Lazovic,&nbsp;Farah Chohan,&nbsp;Jannel A Lawrence,&nbsp;Mahnoor Sukaina,&nbsp;Omoyeme Edaki,&nbsp;Kester Nedd","doi":"10.1177/25151355221128086","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25151355221128086","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The peak of the third wave of COVID-19 infection was in the summer (August-September) of 2021, dominated by the Delta variant. Florida was the epicenter of the third wave with more than 151,449 cases in the first week of August with a positivity rate of 20%. The purpose of this study is to identify the percentage of COVID-19 infection in vaccinated patients in a minority population in south Florida and to elucidate the relationship, if any, between demographics and breakthrough infections, the rate of vaccine hesitancy, as well as the willingness to receive the monoclonal antibody REGEN-COV for the treatment of COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was performed at the Emergency Department, Larkin Community Hospital Palm Spring Campus, located in Hialeah, the fourth largest city in Florida. Hialeah is dominated (94.7%) by Hispanics and Latinos. This city represents a cross-sectional sample of US cities in general and Florida in specific. We enrolled 127 COVID-19 PCR-positive patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The infection in vaccinated patients (breakthrough) was found to be about one in three (34%). Despite the high infection rate and mounting death toll, about 73% of our unvaccinated patients answered no to the question 'knowing the consequences of being infected with COVID-19 and the fact that you are positive, would you have chosen to be vaccinated earlier?' However, about 27% of these patients agreed to receive the vaccine and 20.5% received the monoclonal antibody REGEN-COV.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study revealed that vaccine hesitancy in South Florida continues to be a major challenge, especially with the emergence of mutations including Delta plus and Omicron.</p>","PeriodicalId":33285,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1c/16/10.1177_25151355221128086.PMC9548452.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33503111","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1