首页 > 最新文献

Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy最新文献

英文 中文
Different drug approaches to COVID-19 treatment worldwide: an update of new drugs and drugs repositioning to fight against the novel coronavirus. 全球治疗COVID-19的不同药物方法:新药更新和药物重新定位以对抗新型冠状病毒
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/25151355221144845
Josidel Conceição Oliver, Evandro Neves Silva, Letícia Martins Soares, Gislaine Cristina Scodeler, Ana de Souza Santos, Patrícia Paiva Corsetti, Carlos Roberto Prudêncio, Leonardo Augusto de Almeida
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), in the second half of 2022, there are about 606 million confirmed cases of COVID-19 and almost 6,500,000 deaths around the world. A pandemic was declared by the WHO in March 2020 when the new coronavirus spread around the world. The short time between the first cases in Wuhan and the declaration of a pandemic initiated the search for ways to stop the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) or to attempt to cure the disease COVID-19. More than ever, research groups are developing vaccines, drugs, and immunobiological compounds, and they are even trying to repurpose drugs in an increasing number of clinical trials. There are great expectations regarding the vaccine’s effectiveness for the prevention of COVID-19. However, producing sufficient doses of vaccines for the entire population and SARS-CoV-2 variants are challenges for pharmaceutical industries. On the contrary, efforts have been made to create different vaccines with different approaches so that they can be used by the entire population. Here, we summarize about 8162 clinical trials, showing a greater number of drug clinical trials in Europe and the United States and less clinical trials in low-income countries. Promising results about the use of new drugs and drug repositioning, monoclonal antibodies, convalescent plasma, and mesenchymal stem cells to control viral infection/replication or the hyper-inflammatory response to the new coronavirus bring hope to treat the disease.
根据世界卫生组织(世卫组织)的数据,2022年下半年,全球约有6.06亿例新冠肺炎确诊病例,近650万人死亡。2020年3月,当新型冠状病毒在全球传播时,世界卫生组织宣布了一场大流行。从武汉出现第一例病例到宣布大流行之间的短暂时间,开启了寻找阻止严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)传播或试图治愈COVID-19疾病的方法。研究小组比以往任何时候都更多地开发疫苗、药物和免疫生物学化合物,他们甚至试图在越来越多的临床试验中改变药物的用途。人们对该疫苗的预防效果寄予厚望。然而,为全体人口和SARS-CoV-2变体生产足够剂量的疫苗是制药行业面临的挑战。相反,已经作出努力,用不同的方法研制不同的疫苗,以便所有人都能使用。在这里,我们总结了大约8162项临床试验,欧洲和美国的药物临床试验数量较多,而低收入国家的临床试验较少。利用新药和药物重新定位、单克隆抗体、恢复期血浆和间充质干细胞控制病毒感染/复制或对新型冠状病毒的高炎症反应等方面的可喜成果为治疗该病带来了希望。
{"title":"Different drug approaches to COVID-19 treatment worldwide: an update of new drugs and drugs repositioning to fight against the novel coronavirus.","authors":"Josidel Conceição Oliver, Evandro Neves Silva, Letícia Martins Soares, Gislaine Cristina Scodeler, Ana de Souza Santos, Patrícia Paiva Corsetti, Carlos Roberto Prudêncio, Leonardo Augusto de Almeida","doi":"10.1177/25151355221144845","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25151355221144845","url":null,"abstract":"According to the World Health Organization (WHO), in the second half of 2022, there are about 606 million confirmed cases of COVID-19 and almost 6,500,000 deaths around the world. A pandemic was declared by the WHO in March 2020 when the new coronavirus spread around the world. The short time between the first cases in Wuhan and the declaration of a pandemic initiated the search for ways to stop the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) or to attempt to cure the disease COVID-19. More than ever, research groups are developing vaccines, drugs, and immunobiological compounds, and they are even trying to repurpose drugs in an increasing number of clinical trials. There are great expectations regarding the vaccine’s effectiveness for the prevention of COVID-19. However, producing sufficient doses of vaccines for the entire population and SARS-CoV-2 variants are challenges for pharmaceutical industries. On the contrary, efforts have been made to create different vaccines with different approaches so that they can be used by the entire population. Here, we summarize about 8162 clinical trials, showing a greater number of drug clinical trials in Europe and the United States and less clinical trials in low-income countries. Promising results about the use of new drugs and drug repositioning, monoclonal antibodies, convalescent plasma, and mesenchymal stem cells to control viral infection/replication or the hyper-inflammatory response to the new coronavirus bring hope to treat the disease.","PeriodicalId":33285,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ca/af/10.1177_25151355221144845.PMC9791004.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10663465","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Monitoring the safety of influenza A/H1N1 pandemic and seasonal vaccines in Morocco 监测摩洛哥甲型H1N1流感大流行疫苗和季节性疫苗的安全性
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/25151355221088157
A. Tebaa, R. Benkirane, L. Alj, I. Cherkaoui, R. Soulaymani-Bencheikh
Background: A vaccination campaign against pandemic influenza A/H1N1 was implemented in Morocco between November 2009 and April 2010. Overall, 705,883 subjects were vaccinated by Pandemrix, Arepanrix, and Panenza. The adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) data comparison was made with the 2014/2015 seasonal influenza vaccination campaign that was specifically investigated. Aim: To evaluate the safety of the 2009 pandemic influenza A/H1N1 vaccine and to compare it to that of 2014 seasonal influenza vaccine. Methods: During the pandemic vaccination campaign, the Morocco Pharmacovigilance Centre reinforced passive AEFI surveillance with an active and prospective monitoring programme of 1000 immunized people over 6 months at 10 randomly selected vaccination centres. For the 2014/2015 seasonal vaccination campaign, AEFI data were collected from spontaneous notifications. Results: Active monitoring of 2009 pandemic collected 771 AEFI reports, corresponding to an AEFI incidence rate of 77.1% with vaccination by either Pandemrix or Arepanrix vaccine in 95% of cases. Reported AEFI were most frequently local (37.7%), general (29.5%), and neurological reactions (20.3%). Most of the AEFI (95.5%) were observed during the first 48 hours after vaccination, and the remainder within 2 weeks. None of the reported AEFI were serious case. The highest rate of notification was documented for health professionals, followed by patients with diabetes or chronic respiratory diseases. Concerning passive surveillance, the AEFI notification rate was significantly higher for the 2009/2010 pandemic vaccine (3.1 vs 1.2 per 10,000). However, there was no significant difference between pandemic and seasonal vaccination with regards to the serious adverse events (SAE) notification rate (0.3 vs 0.2 per 10,000). Conclusion: Data analysis indicates that the vaccines used against 2009 pandemic influenza in Morocco have a satisfactory safety profile, similar to the seasonal influenza vaccine with the exception of local reactions as observed previously in other countries.
背景:摩洛哥于2009年11月至2010年4月期间开展了针对甲型H1N1大流行性流感的疫苗接种运动。总体而言,705,883名受试者接种了Pandemrix、Arepanrix和Panenza疫苗。免疫接种后不良事件(AEFIs)数据与2014/2015年季节性流感疫苗接种运动进行了比较。目的:评价2009年甲型H1N1流感大流行疫苗的安全性,并与2014年季节性流感疫苗进行比较。方法:在大流行疫苗接种运动期间,摩洛哥药物警戒中心加强了被动AEFI监测,在10个随机选择的疫苗接种中心开展了为期6个月的主动和前瞻性监测计划,对1000名接种者进行了免疫接种。对于2014/2015年季节性疫苗接种运动,AEFI数据是从自发通报中收集的。结果:2009年大流行的主动监测收集了771份AEFI报告,对应的AEFI发病率为77.1%,95%的病例接种了Pandemrix或Arepanrix疫苗。报告的AEFI最常见的是局部(37.7%),一般(29.5%)和神经反应(20.3%)。大多数AEFI(95.5%)发生在接种后48小时内,其余发生在2周内。报告的急性呼吸道感染无严重病例。报告率最高的是卫生专业人员,其次是糖尿病或慢性呼吸系统疾病患者。在被动监测方面,2009/2010年大流行性流感疫苗的AEFI通报率要高得多(3.1 vs 1.2 / 10,000)。然而,在严重不良事件(SAE)通报率方面,大流行疫苗和季节性疫苗之间没有显著差异(0.3 vs 0.2 / 10,000)。结论:数据分析表明,摩洛哥用于预防2009年大流行性流感的疫苗具有令人满意的安全性,与季节性流感疫苗类似,但以前在其他国家观察到的局部反应除外。
{"title":"Monitoring the safety of influenza A/H1N1 pandemic and seasonal vaccines in Morocco","authors":"A. Tebaa, R. Benkirane, L. Alj, I. Cherkaoui, R. Soulaymani-Bencheikh","doi":"10.1177/25151355221088157","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25151355221088157","url":null,"abstract":"Background: A vaccination campaign against pandemic influenza A/H1N1 was implemented in Morocco between November 2009 and April 2010. Overall, 705,883 subjects were vaccinated by Pandemrix, Arepanrix, and Panenza. The adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) data comparison was made with the 2014/2015 seasonal influenza vaccination campaign that was specifically investigated. Aim: To evaluate the safety of the 2009 pandemic influenza A/H1N1 vaccine and to compare it to that of 2014 seasonal influenza vaccine. Methods: During the pandemic vaccination campaign, the Morocco Pharmacovigilance Centre reinforced passive AEFI surveillance with an active and prospective monitoring programme of 1000 immunized people over 6 months at 10 randomly selected vaccination centres. For the 2014/2015 seasonal vaccination campaign, AEFI data were collected from spontaneous notifications. Results: Active monitoring of 2009 pandemic collected 771 AEFI reports, corresponding to an AEFI incidence rate of 77.1% with vaccination by either Pandemrix or Arepanrix vaccine in 95% of cases. Reported AEFI were most frequently local (37.7%), general (29.5%), and neurological reactions (20.3%). Most of the AEFI (95.5%) were observed during the first 48 hours after vaccination, and the remainder within 2 weeks. None of the reported AEFI were serious case. The highest rate of notification was documented for health professionals, followed by patients with diabetes or chronic respiratory diseases. Concerning passive surveillance, the AEFI notification rate was significantly higher for the 2009/2010 pandemic vaccine (3.1 vs 1.2 per 10,000). However, there was no significant difference between pandemic and seasonal vaccination with regards to the serious adverse events (SAE) notification rate (0.3 vs 0.2 per 10,000). Conclusion: Data analysis indicates that the vaccines used against 2009 pandemic influenza in Morocco have a satisfactory safety profile, similar to the seasonal influenza vaccine with the exception of local reactions as observed previously in other countries.","PeriodicalId":33285,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48295441","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Low rate of COVID-19 vaccination in Africa: a cause for concern 非洲新冠肺炎疫苗接种率低:令人担忧
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/25151355221088159
Mohammed Al-Kassim Hassan, Auwal Adam Bala, A. Jatau
Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). The development of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines in an unprecedented timeline was a major breakthrough and provided a significant lifeline to bring the global pandemic caused by the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) under control. To date, these vaccines remain the safest and most effective tool available to combat the pandemic that has caused significant morbidities, mortalities, and economic downturns.1,2 Undoubtedly, the vaccine rollout has been marred by controversial issues such as vaccine inequity, vaccine nationalism, and vaccine hesitancy3 despite published scientific data from clinical trials.
知识共享非商业CC BY-NC:本文根据知识共享归因非商业4.0许可条款分发(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)允许对作品进行非商业性使用、复制和分发,而无需进一步许可,前提是原始作品的归属符合SAGE和开放获取页面的规定(https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage)。2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)疫苗的开发在前所未有的时间内取得了重大突破,并为控制新型严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)引起的全球大流行提供了重要生命线。到目前为止,这些疫苗仍然是抗击疫情的最安全、最有效的工具,这场疫情已经导致了严重的疾病、死亡和经济衰退。1,2毫无疑问,尽管临床试验的科学数据已经公布,但疫苗的推出受到了疫苗不公平、疫苗民族主义和疫苗犹豫等有争议问题的破坏3。
{"title":"Low rate of COVID-19 vaccination in Africa: a cause for concern","authors":"Mohammed Al-Kassim Hassan, Auwal Adam Bala, A. Jatau","doi":"10.1177/25151355221088159","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25151355221088159","url":null,"abstract":"Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). The development of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines in an unprecedented timeline was a major breakthrough and provided a significant lifeline to bring the global pandemic caused by the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) under control. To date, these vaccines remain the safest and most effective tool available to combat the pandemic that has caused significant morbidities, mortalities, and economic downturns.1,2 Undoubtedly, the vaccine rollout has been marred by controversial issues such as vaccine inequity, vaccine nationalism, and vaccine hesitancy3 despite published scientific data from clinical trials.","PeriodicalId":33285,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41723892","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Predicting epitopes for vaccine development using bioinformatics tools 利用生物信息学工具预测疫苗开发的表位
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/25151355221100218
Valentina Yurina, O. R. Adianingsih
Epitope-based DNA vaccine development is one application of bioinformatics or in silico studies, that is, computational methods, including mathematical, chemical, and biological approaches, which are widely used in drug development. Many in silico studies have been conducted to analyze the efficacy, safety, toxicity effects, and interactions of drugs. In the vaccine design process, in silico studies are performed to predict epitopes that could trigger T-cell and B-cell reactions that would produce both cellular and humoral immune responses. Immunoinformatics is the branch of bioinformatics used to study the relationship between immune responses and predicted epitopes. Progress in immunoinformatics has been rapid and has led to the development of a variety of tools that are used for the prediction of epitopes recognized by B cells or T cells as well as the antigenic responses. However, the in silico approach to vaccine design is still relatively new; thus, this review is aimed at increasing understanding of the importance of in silico studies in the design of vaccines and thereby facilitating future research in this field.
基于表位的DNA疫苗开发是生物信息学或计算机研究的一种应用,即计算方法,包括数学、化学和生物学方法,广泛用于药物开发。已经进行了许多计算机研究来分析药物的疗效、安全性、毒性作用和相互作用。在疫苗设计过程中,进行了计算机研究,以预测可能引发T细胞和B细胞反应的表位,从而产生细胞和体液免疫反应。免疫信息学是生物信息学的一个分支,用于研究免疫反应和预测表位之间的关系。免疫信息学的进展很快,并导致了用于预测B细胞或T细胞识别的表位以及抗原反应的各种工具的开发。然而,疫苗设计的计算机方法仍然相对较新;因此,这篇综述旨在加深对计算机研究在疫苗设计中的重要性的理解,从而促进该领域未来的研究。
{"title":"Predicting epitopes for vaccine development using bioinformatics tools","authors":"Valentina Yurina, O. R. Adianingsih","doi":"10.1177/25151355221100218","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25151355221100218","url":null,"abstract":"Epitope-based DNA vaccine development is one application of bioinformatics or in silico studies, that is, computational methods, including mathematical, chemical, and biological approaches, which are widely used in drug development. Many in silico studies have been conducted to analyze the efficacy, safety, toxicity effects, and interactions of drugs. In the vaccine design process, in silico studies are performed to predict epitopes that could trigger T-cell and B-cell reactions that would produce both cellular and humoral immune responses. Immunoinformatics is the branch of bioinformatics used to study the relationship between immune responses and predicted epitopes. Progress in immunoinformatics has been rapid and has led to the development of a variety of tools that are used for the prediction of epitopes recognized by B cells or T cells as well as the antigenic responses. However, the in silico approach to vaccine design is still relatively new; thus, this review is aimed at increasing understanding of the importance of in silico studies in the design of vaccines and thereby facilitating future research in this field.","PeriodicalId":33285,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42866734","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13
Identifying higher risk subgroups of health care workers for priority vaccination against COVID-19 确定卫生保健工作者高危亚群,优先接种COVID-19疫苗
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/25151355221080724
M. Haq, A. Rehman, M. Haq, Hala Haq, Hala Rajab, Junaid Ahmad, J. Ahmed, Saeed Anwar, Sajjad Ahmad, N. Haq
Background: Health care workers (HCWs) are exposed to high risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection due to close contact with infected patients in hospital. The objective of this study was to estimate the seroprevalence and to identify the exposure risk of various subgroups among HCWs to prioritize them for early vaccination. Methods: This was a multicentre cross-sectional study conducted between 15 and 29 June 2020. A total of 987 HCWs were recruited randomly from two major tertiary-care hospitals of Peshawar city, Pakistan. The HCWs included doctors, nurses, paramedics and hospital support staff. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved kit was used for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Results: Overall, 310 (31.4%) HCWs were seropositive for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (95% confidence interval, CI: 28.5–34.4). Seroprevalence was higher in males (33.5%) and in age group 51–60 years (40.9%). Seropositivity increased with increasing age from 8.3% in age group ⩽20 to 40.9% in 51–60 years of age group (p < 0.05). The highest seroprevalence was identified in paramedical staff (42·5%, 95% CI: 36.6–48.6) followed by nursing staff (38·8%, 95% CI: 32.1–45.7). In logistic regression, being a male HCW led to higher risk of seropositivity (odds ratio, OR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1·06–2.13. p < 0.05) compared with female staff members. The odds of seropositivity was higher in nurses (OR: 3·47, 95% CI: 1.99–6.05. p < 0.01), paramedical staff (OR: 3·19, 95% CI: 1.93–5.28. p < 0.01) and hospital support staff (OR: 2·47, 95% CI: 1.29–4.7. p < 0.01) compared with consultants. Conclusion: Overall, our results concluded that nursing and paramedical staff are at higher risk and should be vaccinated on priority.
背景:医护人员因与院内感染患者密切接触而暴露在严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)感染的高危人群中。本研究的目的是估计血清阳性率,并确定卫生保健工作人员中不同亚群的暴露风险,以优先考虑早期接种疫苗。方法:这是一项多中心横断面研究,于2020年6月15日至29日进行。从巴基斯坦白沙瓦市的两家主要三级医院随机招募了987名卫生保健员。医护人员包括医生、护士、护理人员和医院支援人员。使用美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准的试剂盒检测SARS-CoV-2抗体。结果:总体而言,310名(31.4%)医护人员SARS-CoV-2抗体血清阳性(95%置信区间,CI: 28.5-34.4)。血清阳性率在男性(33.5%)和51-60岁年龄组(40.9%)中较高。血清阳性率随年龄增长呈上升趋势,从≥20岁组的8.3%上升至51 ~ 60岁组的40.9% (p < 0.05)。血清阳性率最高的是医护人员(42.5%,95% CI: 36.6-48.6),其次是护理人员(38.8%,95% CI: 32.1-45.7)。在logistic回归中,男性HCW导致血清阳性的风险更高(优势比OR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.06 - 2.13)。P < 0.05)。护士血清阳性的几率较高(OR: 3.47, 95% CI: 1.99 ~ 6.05)。p < 0.01),医务辅助人员(OR: 3.19, 95% CI: 1.93 ~ 5.28)。p < 0.01)和医院支持人员(OR: 2.47, 95% CI: 1.29-4.7)。P < 0.01)。结论:总体而言,我们的结果表明,护理人员和辅助医务人员的风险较高,应优先接种疫苗。
{"title":"Identifying higher risk subgroups of health care workers for priority vaccination against COVID-19","authors":"M. Haq, A. Rehman, M. Haq, Hala Haq, Hala Rajab, Junaid Ahmad, J. Ahmed, Saeed Anwar, Sajjad Ahmad, N. Haq","doi":"10.1177/25151355221080724","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25151355221080724","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Health care workers (HCWs) are exposed to high risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection due to close contact with infected patients in hospital. The objective of this study was to estimate the seroprevalence and to identify the exposure risk of various subgroups among HCWs to prioritize them for early vaccination. Methods: This was a multicentre cross-sectional study conducted between 15 and 29 June 2020. A total of 987 HCWs were recruited randomly from two major tertiary-care hospitals of Peshawar city, Pakistan. The HCWs included doctors, nurses, paramedics and hospital support staff. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved kit was used for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Results: Overall, 310 (31.4%) HCWs were seropositive for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (95% confidence interval, CI: 28.5–34.4). Seroprevalence was higher in males (33.5%) and in age group 51–60 years (40.9%). Seropositivity increased with increasing age from 8.3% in age group ⩽20 to 40.9% in 51–60 years of age group (p < 0.05). The highest seroprevalence was identified in paramedical staff (42·5%, 95% CI: 36.6–48.6) followed by nursing staff (38·8%, 95% CI: 32.1–45.7). In logistic regression, being a male HCW led to higher risk of seropositivity (odds ratio, OR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1·06–2.13. p < 0.05) compared with female staff members. The odds of seropositivity was higher in nurses (OR: 3·47, 95% CI: 1.99–6.05. p < 0.01), paramedical staff (OR: 3·19, 95% CI: 1.93–5.28. p < 0.01) and hospital support staff (OR: 2·47, 95% CI: 1.29–4.7. p < 0.01) compared with consultants. Conclusion: Overall, our results concluded that nursing and paramedical staff are at higher risk and should be vaccinated on priority.","PeriodicalId":33285,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43516991","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Safety and reactogenicity of the adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine: experience from clinical trials and post-marketing surveillance. 佐剂重组带状疱疹疫苗的安全性和反应原性:来自临床试验和上市后监测的经验
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-11-30 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/25151355211057479
Joseph Fiore, Maribel Miranda Co-van der Mee, Andrés Maldonado, Lisa Glasser, Phil Watson

An adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) is licensed for the prevention of herpes zoster. This paper reviews its safety and reactogenicity. A pooled analysis of two pivotal randomized Phase-3 trials (NCT01165177, NCT01165229) in adults ⩾50 years found that more solicited adverse events (AEs) were reported with RZV than placebo. Injection site pain was the most common solicited AE (RZV: 78.0% participants; placebo: 10.9%). Grade-3 pain occurred in 6.4% of RZV and 0.3% of placebo recipients. Myalgia, fatigue, and headache were the most commonly reported general solicited AEs (RZV: 44.7%, 44.5%, and 37.7%, respectively; placebo: 11.7%, 16.5%, and 15.5%, respectively). Most symptoms were mild to moderate in intensity with a median duration of 2-3 days. The intensity of reactogenicity symptoms did not differ substantially after the first and second vaccine doses. The pooled analysis of the pivotal Phase-3 trials did not identify any clinically relevant differences in the overall incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs), fatal AEs or potential immune-mediated diseases (pIMDs) between RZV and placebo. Reactogenicity in five studies of immunocompromised patients ⩾18 years (autologous stem cell transplant, human immunodeficiency virus, solid tumors, hematological malignancies, and renal transplant; NCT01610414, NCT01165203, NCT01798056, NCT01767467, and NCT02058589) was consistent with that observed in the pivotal Phase-3 trials. There were no clinically relevant differences between RZV and placebo in the immunocompromised populations with regard to overall incidence of SAEs, fatal AEs, pIMDs, or AEs related to patients' underlying condition. Post-marketing surveillance found that the most commonly reported AEs were consistent with the reactogenicity profile of the vaccine in clinical trials. Overall, the clinical safety data for RZV are reassuring.

佐剂重组带状疱疹疫苗(RZV)被批准用于预防带状疱疹。本文综述了其安全性和反应原性。在小于50岁的成年人中对两项关键随机3期试验(NCT01165177, NCT01165229)进行的汇总分析发现,RZV报告的不良事件(ae)多于安慰剂。注射部位疼痛是最常见的AE (RZV: 78.0%;安慰剂:10.9%)。3级疼痛发生在6.4%的RZV和0.3%的安慰剂接受者中。肌痛、疲劳和头痛是最常见的一般性不良反应(RZV分别为44.7%、44.5%和37.7%);安慰剂:分别为11.7%、16.5%和15.5%)。大多数症状为轻度至中度,中位持续时间为2-3天。在第一次和第二次接种疫苗后,反应性症状的强度没有显著差异。关键3期试验的汇总分析未发现RZV和安慰剂在严重不良事件(sae)、致命ae或潜在免疫介导疾病(pIMDs)的总发生率方面有任何临床相关差异。免疫功能受损患者的5项研究中的反应原性大于或等于18年(自体干细胞移植、人类免疫缺陷病毒、实体瘤、血液恶性肿瘤和肾移植;NCT01610414、NCT01165203、NCT01798056、NCT01767467和NCT02058589)与关键3期试验中观察到的结果一致。在免疫功能低下人群中,RZV和安慰剂在SAEs、致死性ae、pimd或与患者基础疾病相关的ae的总发生率方面没有临床相关差异。上市后监测发现,最常见的ae报告与临床试验中疫苗的反应性相符。总的来说,RZV的临床安全性数据令人放心。
{"title":"Safety and reactogenicity of the adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine: experience from clinical trials and post-marketing surveillance.","authors":"Joseph Fiore,&nbsp;Maribel Miranda Co-van der Mee,&nbsp;Andrés Maldonado,&nbsp;Lisa Glasser,&nbsp;Phil Watson","doi":"10.1177/25151355211057479","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25151355211057479","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) is licensed for the prevention of herpes zoster. This paper reviews its safety and reactogenicity. A pooled analysis of two pivotal randomized Phase-3 trials (NCT01165177, NCT01165229) in adults ⩾50 years found that more solicited adverse events (AEs) were reported with RZV than placebo. Injection site pain was the most common solicited AE (RZV: 78.0% participants; placebo: 10.9%). Grade-3 pain occurred in 6.4% of RZV and 0.3% of placebo recipients. Myalgia, fatigue, and headache were the most commonly reported general solicited AEs (RZV: 44.7%, 44.5%, and 37.7%, respectively; placebo: 11.7%, 16.5%, and 15.5%, respectively). Most symptoms were mild to moderate in intensity with a median duration of 2-3 days. The intensity of reactogenicity symptoms did not differ substantially after the first and second vaccine doses. The pooled analysis of the pivotal Phase-3 trials did not identify any clinically relevant differences in the overall incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs), fatal AEs or potential immune-mediated diseases (pIMDs) between RZV and placebo. Reactogenicity in five studies of immunocompromised patients ⩾18 years (autologous stem cell transplant, human immunodeficiency virus, solid tumors, hematological malignancies, and renal transplant; NCT01610414, NCT01165203, NCT01798056, NCT01767467, and NCT02058589) was consistent with that observed in the pivotal Phase-3 trials. There were no clinically relevant differences between RZV and placebo in the immunocompromised populations with regard to overall incidence of SAEs, fatal AEs, pIMDs, or AEs related to patients' underlying condition. Post-marketing surveillance found that the most commonly reported AEs were consistent with the reactogenicity profile of the vaccine in clinical trials. Overall, the clinical safety data for RZV are reassuring.</p>","PeriodicalId":33285,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f2/70/10.1177_25151355211057479.PMC8734271.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39802403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Comprehensive literature review on COVID-19 vaccines and role of SARS-CoV-2 variants in the pandemic. 关于COVID-19疫苗和SARS-CoV-2变体在大流行中的作用的综合文献综述。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-11-24 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/25151355211059791
Charles Yap, Abulhassan Ali, Amogh Prabhakar, Akul Prabhakar, Aman Pal, Ying Yi Lim, Pramath Kakodkar

Since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a rapid expansion in vaccine research focusing on exploiting the novel discoveries on the pathophysiology, genomics, and molecular biology of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Although the current preventive measures are primarily socially distancing by maintaining a 1 m distance, it is supplemented using facial masks and other personal hygiene measures. However, the induction of vaccines as primary prevention is crucial to eradicating the disease to attempt restoration to normalcy. This literature review aims to describe the physiology of the vaccines and how the spike protein is used as a target to elicit an antibody-dependent immune response in humans. Furthermore, the overview, dosing strategies, efficacy, and side effects will be discussed for the notable vaccines: BioNTech/Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Gamaleya, and SinoVac. In addition, the development of other prominent COVID-19 vaccines will be highlighted alongside the sustainability of the vaccine-mediated immune response and current contraindications. As the research is rapidly expanding, we have looked at the association between pregnancy and COVID-19 vaccinations, in addition to the current reviews on the mixing of vaccines. Finally, the prominent emerging variants of concern are described, and the efficacy of the notable vaccines toward these variants has been summarized.

自新冠肺炎大流行爆发以来,疫苗研究迅速扩展,重点是利用严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染的病理生理学、基因组学和分子生物学方面的新发现。尽管目前的预防措施主要是通过保持1米的距离来保持社交距离,但它还辅以口罩和其他个人卫生措施。然而,将疫苗作为主要预防措施,对于根除疾病以尝试恢复正常至关重要。这篇文献综述旨在描述疫苗的生理学,以及刺突蛋白如何作为靶点在人类中引发抗体依赖性免疫反应。此外,将讨论著名疫苗的概述、给药策略、疗效和副作用:BioNTech/辉瑞、莫德纳、阿斯利康、杨森、加马列亚和SinoVac。此外,其他突出的新冠肺炎疫苗的开发将与疫苗介导的免疫反应和当前禁忌症的可持续性一起得到强调。随着研究的迅速扩大,除了目前关于疫苗混合的评论外,我们还研究了怀孕与新冠肺炎疫苗接种之间的关系。最后,描述了突出的新出现的变异毒株,并总结了显著疫苗对这些变种的疗效。
{"title":"Comprehensive literature review on COVID-19 vaccines and role of SARS-CoV-2 variants in the pandemic.","authors":"Charles Yap,&nbsp;Abulhassan Ali,&nbsp;Amogh Prabhakar,&nbsp;Akul Prabhakar,&nbsp;Aman Pal,&nbsp;Ying Yi Lim,&nbsp;Pramath Kakodkar","doi":"10.1177/25151355211059791","DOIUrl":"10.1177/25151355211059791","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a rapid expansion in vaccine research focusing on exploiting the novel discoveries on the pathophysiology, genomics, and molecular biology of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Although the current preventive measures are primarily socially distancing by maintaining a 1 m distance, it is supplemented using facial masks and other personal hygiene measures. However, the induction of vaccines as primary prevention is crucial to eradicating the disease to attempt restoration to normalcy. This literature review aims to describe the physiology of the vaccines and how the spike protein is used as a target to elicit an antibody-dependent immune response in humans. Furthermore, the overview, dosing strategies, efficacy, and side effects will be discussed for the notable vaccines: BioNTech/Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Gamaleya, and SinoVac. In addition, the development of other prominent COVID-19 vaccines will be highlighted alongside the sustainability of the vaccine-mediated immune response and current contraindications. As the research is rapidly expanding, we have looked at the association between pregnancy and COVID-19 vaccinations, in addition to the current reviews on the mixing of vaccines. Finally, the prominent emerging variants of concern are described, and the efficacy of the notable vaccines toward these variants has been summarized.</p>","PeriodicalId":33285,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/96/23/10.1177_25151355211059791.PMC8637774.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39696355","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18
Adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination: first 90 days of experience from a tertiary care teaching hospital in South India. COVID-19疫苗接种后的不良事件:来自南印度一家三级保健教学医院的头90天经验
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-11-22 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/25151355211055833
Chetak Kadabasal Basavaraja, Juny Sebastian, Mandyam Dhati Ravi, Sheba Baby John

Background: The COVID-19 vaccination program was introduced in India on 16 January 2021. The Government-issued fact sheet was the only source of information regarding Adverse Events Following Immunizations (AEFIs) for these vaccines. The objective of this study was to assess the AEFIs reported following COVID-19 vaccination in a tertiary care teaching hospital.

Materials and methods: The spontaneous reporting method was used for data collection for a period of 3 months. A data collection form was designed to collect the data from the study population who reported adverse events. Collected data were analyzed and categorized by severity and seriousness. The causality assessment team performed causality assessment of the AEFIs using the World Health Organization's causality assessment algorithm.

Results: A total of 11,656 doses of COVID-19 vaccine were administered at the study site during the study period, of which 9292 doses were COVISHIELD™ and 2364 doses were COVAXIN™. In all, 445 AEFIs were reported from 269 subjects with an incidence rate of 3.48%. The majority of the subjects with AEFIs belonged to the age group of 18-45 years. Out of the total 445 AEFIs, 418 AEFIs were expected as per the fact sheets, 409 with COVISHIELD™ and 9 with COVAXIN™. Most of the AEFIs [62.02% (n = 276)] were observed at the system organ class of 'General disorders and administration site conditions'. After the causality assessment, out of 433 AEFIs to COVISHIELDTM vaccine, 94.22% (n = 408) of events were categorized to have 'consistent causal association with immunization'. Out of 12 adverse events following COVAXIN™, 8 (66.66%) events were categorized as 'consistent causal association with immunization'. All of them recovered from their adverse events without any sequelae.

Conclusion: Spontaneous reporting is one of the cheapest methods that can be used for the reporting of AEFI. This method helps health care professionals to identify rare events and potential signals.

背景:印度于2021年1月16日开始实施COVID-19疫苗接种规划。政府发布的情况说明书是关于这些疫苗接种后不良事件的唯一信息来源。本研究的目的是评估三级保健教学医院COVID-19疫苗接种后报告的aefi。材料和方法:采用自发报告法收集数据,为期3个月。设计了一份数据收集表,从报告不良事件的研究人群中收集数据。对收集的数据进行分析并按严重程度和严重性分类。因果关系评估小组使用世界卫生组织的因果关系评估算法对急性呼吸系统疾病进行了因果关系评估。结果:在研究期间,研究地点共接种了11,656剂COVID-19疫苗,其中9292剂为COVISHIELD™,2364剂为COVAXIN™。269例受试者共报告急性脑梗死445例,发生率3.48%。aefi患者以18-45岁年龄组居多。在总共445个aefi中,418个aefi根据情况说明书预计,409个使用COVISHIELD™,9个使用COVAXIN™。大多数aefi [62.02% (n = 276)]发生在“一般疾病和给药部位状况”的系统器官类别。经过因果关系评估,在433例COVISHIELDTM疫苗的不良事件中,94.22% (n = 408)的事件被归类为“与免疫接种有一致的因果关系”。在COVAXIN™后的12个不良事件中,8个(66.66%)事件被归类为“与免疫接种一致的因果关联”。所有患者均从不良事件中恢复,无任何后遗症。结论:自发性报告是报告急性脑损伤最经济的方法之一。这种方法有助于卫生保健专业人员识别罕见事件和潜在信号。
{"title":"Adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination: first 90 days of experience from a tertiary care teaching hospital in South India.","authors":"Chetak Kadabasal Basavaraja,&nbsp;Juny Sebastian,&nbsp;Mandyam Dhati Ravi,&nbsp;Sheba Baby John","doi":"10.1177/25151355211055833","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25151355211055833","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 vaccination program was introduced in India on 16 January 2021. The Government-issued fact sheet was the only source of information regarding Adverse Events Following Immunizations (AEFIs) for these vaccines. The objective of this study was to assess the AEFIs reported following COVID-19 vaccination in a tertiary care teaching hospital.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The spontaneous reporting method was used for data collection for a period of 3 months. A data collection form was designed to collect the data from the study population who reported adverse events. Collected data were analyzed and categorized by severity and seriousness. The causality assessment team performed causality assessment of the AEFIs using the World Health Organization's causality assessment algorithm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11,656 doses of COVID-19 vaccine were administered at the study site during the study period, of which 9292 doses were COVISHIELD™ and 2364 doses were COVAXIN™. In all, 445 AEFIs were reported from 269 subjects with an incidence rate of 3.48%. The majority of the subjects with AEFIs belonged to the age group of 18-45 years. Out of the total 445 AEFIs, 418 AEFIs were expected as per the fact sheets, 409 with COVISHIELD™ and 9 with COVAXIN™. Most of the AEFIs [62.02% (<i>n</i> = 276)] were observed at the system organ class of 'General disorders and administration site conditions'. After the causality assessment, out of 433 AEFIs to COVISHIELD<sup>TM</sup> vaccine, 94.22% (<i>n</i> = 408) of events were categorized to have 'consistent causal association with immunization'. Out of 12 adverse events following COVAXIN™, 8 (66.66%) events were categorized as 'consistent causal association with immunization'. All of them recovered from their adverse events without any sequelae.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Spontaneous reporting is one of the cheapest methods that can be used for the reporting of AEFI. This method helps health care professionals to identify rare events and potential signals.</p>","PeriodicalId":33285,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/19/38/10.1177_25151355211055833.PMC8611289.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39674464","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15
Anaphylaxis after Moderna COVID-19 vaccine. 现代COVID-19疫苗后的过敏反应。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-10-28 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/25151355211048418
Jeremy Mayfield, Sumedha Bandi, Latha Ganti, Jose Rubero

The authors of this article report on a case of a patient who presented to the emergency department (ED) in anaphylaxis after receiving the Moderna® COVID-19 vaccine. The patient was hypoxic, with diffuse wheezing bilaterally to auscultation, flush skin, swollen face, and the feeling of her throat closing. Anaphylaxis can have wide range of presentation, the key is recognizing the symptoms and treating early. The incidence of anaphylaxis from COVID-19 vaccine is not well documented to date.

本文作者报告了一例患者在接种Moderna®新冠肺炎疫苗后因过敏反应前往急诊科(ED)。患者缺氧,听诊时双侧弥漫性喘息,皮肤潮红,面部肿胀,有喉咙闭合的感觉。过敏可以有广泛的表现,关键是识别症状并尽早治疗。到目前为止,新冠肺炎疫苗过敏反应的发生率没有很好的记录。
{"title":"Anaphylaxis after Moderna COVID-19 vaccine.","authors":"Jeremy Mayfield,&nbsp;Sumedha Bandi,&nbsp;Latha Ganti,&nbsp;Jose Rubero","doi":"10.1177/25151355211048418","DOIUrl":"10.1177/25151355211048418","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The authors of this article report on a case of a patient who presented to the emergency department (ED) in anaphylaxis after receiving the Moderna® COVID-19 vaccine. The patient was hypoxic, with diffuse wheezing bilaterally to auscultation, flush skin, swollen face, and the feeling of her throat closing. Anaphylaxis can have wide range of presentation, the key is recognizing the symptoms and treating early. The incidence of anaphylaxis from COVID-19 vaccine is not well documented to date.</p>","PeriodicalId":33285,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/08/0e/10.1177_25151355211048418.PMC8558796.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39693692","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Improving vaccine-related health literacy in parents: comparison on the readability of CDC Vaccine Information Statements (VIS) and Health and Human Services (HHS) patient-facing vaccine literature. 提高家长与疫苗相关的健康素养:CDC疫苗信息声明(VIS)和卫生与公众服务部(HHS)面向患者的疫苗文献的可读性比较
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-09-29 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/25151355211047521
Beverley C Millar, John E Moore
{"title":"Improving vaccine-related health literacy in parents: comparison on the readability of CDC Vaccine Information Statements (VIS) and Health and Human Services (HHS) patient-facing vaccine literature.","authors":"Beverley C Millar,&nbsp;John E Moore","doi":"10.1177/25151355211047521","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25151355211047521","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":33285,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/89/60/10.1177_25151355211047521.PMC8485266.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39507124","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1