首页 > 最新文献

BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies最新文献

英文 中文
Response to: “Rise of the machines”: human factors and training for robotic-assisted surgery 回应:“机器的崛起”:人为因素和机器人辅助手术的培训
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI: 10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000115
Jane R. Butterworth, Margaux Sadry, Danielle Julian, Fiona Haig
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Reuse permitted under CC BYNC. No commercial reuse. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. We thank Kerray and Yule for their Editorial on our evaluation of a training program developed specifically for Versius, a nextgeneration system for robotassisted minimal access surgery (MAS). We have found the points raised, particularly those pertaining to validity frameworks and human factors, to be constructive, providing valuable guidance for future studies evaluating the effectiveness of trainings in the surgical setting. The program we described is intended to provide surgeons with practical experience operating the system in a simulated environment and is not focused on a specific surgical specialty or procedure. As such, the aim of the study was to monitor performance using the system as surgeons became more familiar and practiced using the system over the course of the program. The use of Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) scoring provided a validated means of quantifying performance across a range of tasks to allow comparison between surgeon subgroups and timepoints. The proficiency levels were determined from the literature only to help contextualize GEARS scores, not to ascertain operating proficiency for individual surgeons using the system. The features of the device noted in the study publication provide specific examples of how aspects of the design may help remove some of the barriers to uptake of MAS by minimizing the limitations often associated with conventional MAS instruments. Increasing uptake of MAS by incorporating robotic assistance to help improve patient outcomes compared with open surgery was the fundamental driver behind the device’s conception and development; the advantages of MAS over open surgery are numerous and well established, yet MAS utilization has been lower than anticipated hitherto across several common procedures. Cooper et al also note that lack of specific training and exposure to MAS techniques may be partly attributable to the low uptake. We anticipate that purposedesigned training programs such as this one will play an important role in realizing the vast potential of robotic systems as the field evolves. While implementation of Kirkpatrick’s validity framework could have informed the study design to help better address criteria within levels 1 and 3, level 4, assessing the impact of the training on surgical outcomes and safety, was not within the scope of this study as this is only possible in the clinical setting. Ongoing systematic collection of clinical effectiveness and safety data into a purpose designed registry will facilitate longerterm monitoring and largescale analyses of outcomes, in line with IDEALD recommendations. As noted by Kerray and Yule, surgeons with experience using other robotic systems may require more training to adjust to a new platform compared with surgeons with no prior robotics experience. As this surgical syste
©作者(或其雇主)2021。CC BYNC允许重复使用。无商业再利用。请参阅权限和权限。BMJ出版。我们感谢Kerray和Yule对我们专门为Versius开发的培训计划的评估发表的社论,Versius是机器人辅助微创手术(MAS)的下一代系统。我们发现,提出的观点,特别是与有效性框架和人为因素有关的观点,具有建设性,为未来评估手术环境中培训有效性的研究提供了宝贵的指导。我们描述的程序旨在为外科医生提供在模拟环境中操作系统的实践经验,而不是专注于特定的外科专业或程序。因此,该研究的目的是随着外科医生在项目过程中越来越熟悉并练习使用该系统,使用该系统监测性能。机器人技能全球评估评估(GEARS)评分的使用为量化一系列任务的表现提供了一种有效的方法,从而可以在外科医生的亚组和时间点之间进行比较。从文献中确定熟练程度只是为了帮助了解GEARS评分,而不是为了确定使用该系统的外科医生的操作熟练程度。研究出版物中提到的装置的特征提供了具体的例子,说明设计的各个方面如何通过最大限度地减少通常与传统MAS仪器相关的限制来帮助消除MAS吸收的一些障碍。与开放手术相比,通过结合机器人辅助来提高MAS的使用率,以帮助改善患者的预后,这是该设备概念和开发背后的基本驱动因素;MAS相对于开放手术的优势是多方面的,并且已经得到了很好的证实,然而迄今为止,在几种常见的手术中,MAS的利用率低于预期。Cooper等人还指出,缺乏特定的训练和MAS技术的接触可能部分归因于低吸收。我们预计,随着该领域的发展,像这样有目的设计的培训计划将在实现机器人系统的巨大潜力方面发挥重要作用。虽然Kirkpatrick有效性框架的实施本可以为研究设计提供信息,以帮助更好地解决1级和3级标准,但评估培训对手术结果和安全性的影响的4级标准不在本研究的范围内,因为这只有在临床环境中才有可能。根据IDEALD的建议,将临床有效性和安全性数据持续系统地收集到专门设计的登记册中,将有助于长期监测和大规模分析结果。正如Kerray和Yule所指出的,与之前没有机器人经验的外科医生相比,有使用其他机器人系统经验的外科医生可能需要更多的培训来适应新平台。由于这种手术系统是独特的,计划进行一项迁移研究,以调查培训需求的差异,以及如何根据之前在机器人辅助手术中的经验水平来定制该计划。正如社论中所建议的,目前正在将领导力和团队合作等人为因素纳入该计划,包括外科医生与团队的沟通,以确保培训涵盖最佳表现所需的机器人辅助手术的各个方面。这一过程正在进行中,鉴于其新颖的架构,必须针对该设备量身定制人为因素。鉴于缺乏经过验证的培训计划来支持机器人系统在外科手术中的实施,我们感谢Kerray和Yule为未来评估提供的有益建议。
{"title":"Response to: “Rise of the machines”: human factors and training for robotic-assisted surgery","authors":"Jane R. Butterworth, Margaux Sadry, Danielle Julian, Fiona Haig","doi":"10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000115","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000115","url":null,"abstract":"© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Reuse permitted under CC BYNC. No commercial reuse. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. We thank Kerray and Yule for their Editorial on our evaluation of a training program developed specifically for Versius, a nextgeneration system for robotassisted minimal access surgery (MAS). We have found the points raised, particularly those pertaining to validity frameworks and human factors, to be constructive, providing valuable guidance for future studies evaluating the effectiveness of trainings in the surgical setting. The program we described is intended to provide surgeons with practical experience operating the system in a simulated environment and is not focused on a specific surgical specialty or procedure. As such, the aim of the study was to monitor performance using the system as surgeons became more familiar and practiced using the system over the course of the program. The use of Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) scoring provided a validated means of quantifying performance across a range of tasks to allow comparison between surgeon subgroups and timepoints. The proficiency levels were determined from the literature only to help contextualize GEARS scores, not to ascertain operating proficiency for individual surgeons using the system. The features of the device noted in the study publication provide specific examples of how aspects of the design may help remove some of the barriers to uptake of MAS by minimizing the limitations often associated with conventional MAS instruments. Increasing uptake of MAS by incorporating robotic assistance to help improve patient outcomes compared with open surgery was the fundamental driver behind the device’s conception and development; the advantages of MAS over open surgery are numerous and well established, yet MAS utilization has been lower than anticipated hitherto across several common procedures. Cooper et al also note that lack of specific training and exposure to MAS techniques may be partly attributable to the low uptake. We anticipate that purposedesigned training programs such as this one will play an important role in realizing the vast potential of robotic systems as the field evolves. While implementation of Kirkpatrick’s validity framework could have informed the study design to help better address criteria within levels 1 and 3, level 4, assessing the impact of the training on surgical outcomes and safety, was not within the scope of this study as this is only possible in the clinical setting. Ongoing systematic collection of clinical effectiveness and safety data into a purpose designed registry will facilitate longerterm monitoring and largescale analyses of outcomes, in line with IDEALD recommendations. As noted by Kerray and Yule, surgeons with experience using other robotic systems may require more training to adjust to a new platform compared with surgeons with no prior robotics experience. As this surgical syste","PeriodicalId":33349,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46608767","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Cohort study of impact on length of stay of individual enhanced recovery after surgery protocol components. 个体术后增强康复方案组成对住院时间影响的队列研究。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-09-14 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000087
Rachel C Sisodia, Dan Ellis, Michael Hidrue, Pamela Linov, Elena Cavallo, Allison S Bryant, May Wakamatsu, Marcela G Del Carmen

Objective: The goal of this study was to explore which enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) bundle items were most associated with decreased length of stay after surgery, most likely associated with decreased length of stay after surgery.

Design: A cohort study.

Setting: Large tertiary academic medical centre.

Participants: The study included 1318 women undergoing hysterectomy as part of our ERAS pathway between 1 February 2018 and 30 January 2020 and a matched historical cohort of all hysterectomies performed at our institution between 3 October 2016 and 30 January 2018 (n=1063).

Intervention: The addition of ERAS to perioperative care.This is a cohort study of all patients undergoing hysterectomy at an academic medical centre after ERAS implementation on 1 February 2018. Compliance and outcomes after ERAS roll out were monitored and managed by a centralised team. Descriptive statistics, multivariate regression, interrupted time series analysis were used as indicated.

Main outcome measures: Impact of ERAS process measure adherence on length of stay.

Results: After initiation of ERAS pathway, 1318 women underwent hysterectomy. There were more open surgeries after ERAS implementation, but cohorts were otherwise balanced. The impact of process measure adherence on length of stay varied based on surgical approach (minimally invasive vs open). For open surgery, compliance with intraoperative antiemetics (-30%, 95% CI -18% to 40%) and decreased postoperative fluid administration (-12%, 95% CI -1% to 21%) were significantly associated with reduced length of stay. For minimally invasive surgery, ambulation within 8 hours of surgery was associated with reduced length of stay (-53%, 95% CI -55% to 52%).

Conclusions: While adherence to overall ERAS protocols decreases length of stay, the specific components of the bundle most significantly impacting this outcome remain elusive. Our data identify early ambulation, use of antiemetics and decreasing postoperative fluid administration to be associated with decreased length of stay.

目的:本研究的目的是探讨哪些增强术后恢复(ERAS)捆绑项目与术后住院时间缩短最相关,最有可能与术后住院时间缩短相关。设计:队列研究。环境:大型三级学术医疗中心。参与者:该研究包括2018年2月1日至2020年1月30日期间接受子宫切除术的1318名女性,以及2016年10月3日至2018年1月30日期间在我们机构进行的所有子宫切除术的匹配历史队列(n=1063)。干预措施:在围手术期护理中加入ERAS。这是一项队列研究,研究对象是2018年2月1日实施ERAS后在学术医疗中心接受子宫切除术的所有患者。ERAS推出后的合规性和结果由集中团队监控和管理。采用描述性统计、多元回归、中断时间序列分析。主要结果测量:ERAS过程测量依从性对住院时间的影响。结果:经ERAS通路启动后,1318例妇女行子宫切除术。ERAS实施后开放性手术较多,但队列是平衡的。过程测量依从性对住院时间的影响因手术入路(微创与开放)而异。对于开放手术,术中止吐药的依从性(-30%,95% CI -18%至40%)和术后液体给药的减少(-12%,95% CI -1%至21%)与住院时间的缩短显著相关。对于微创手术,手术8小时内走动与住院时间缩短相关(-53%,95% CI -55%至52%)。结论:虽然总体ERAS方案的依从性减少了住院时间,但对该结果影响最大的具体组成部分仍然难以捉摸。我们的数据表明,早期下床、使用止吐药和减少术后液体给药与住院时间缩短有关。
{"title":"Cohort study of impact on length of stay of individual enhanced recovery after surgery protocol components.","authors":"Rachel C Sisodia,&nbsp;Dan Ellis,&nbsp;Michael Hidrue,&nbsp;Pamela Linov,&nbsp;Elena Cavallo,&nbsp;Allison S Bryant,&nbsp;May Wakamatsu,&nbsp;Marcela G Del Carmen","doi":"10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000087","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000087","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The goal of this study was to explore which enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) bundle items were most associated with decreased length of stay after surgery, most likely associated with decreased length of stay after surgery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Large tertiary academic medical centre.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The study included 1318 women undergoing hysterectomy as part of our ERAS pathway between 1 February 2018 and 30 January 2020 and a matched historical cohort of all hysterectomies performed at our institution between 3 October 2016 and 30 January 2018 (n=1063).</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The addition of ERAS to perioperative care.This is a cohort study of all patients undergoing hysterectomy at an academic medical centre after ERAS implementation on 1 February 2018. Compliance and outcomes after ERAS roll out were monitored and managed by a centralised team. Descriptive statistics, multivariate regression, interrupted time series analysis were used as indicated.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Impact of ERAS process measure adherence on length of stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After initiation of ERAS pathway, 1318 women underwent hysterectomy. There were more open surgeries after ERAS implementation, but cohorts were otherwise balanced. The impact of process measure adherence on length of stay varied based on surgical approach (minimally invasive vs open). For open surgery, compliance with intraoperative antiemetics (-30%, 95% CI -18% to 40%) and decreased postoperative fluid administration (-12%, 95% CI -1% to 21%) were significantly associated with reduced length of stay. For minimally invasive surgery, ambulation within 8 hours of surgery was associated with reduced length of stay (-53%, 95% CI -55% to 52%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While adherence to overall ERAS protocols decreases length of stay, the specific components of the bundle most significantly impacting this outcome remain elusive. Our data identify early ambulation, use of antiemetics and decreasing postoperative fluid administration to be associated with decreased length of stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":33349,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/52/4b/bmjsit-2021-000087.PMC8749327.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39834980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Joint effort: a call for standardization in total joint arthroplasty data reporting. 共同努力:全关节置换术数据报告标准化的呼吁。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-09-08 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000079
Alexander Y Liebeskind, Marc Nieuwenhuijse, Jensen H Hyde, Amanda C Chen, Suvekshya Aryal, Per-Henrik Randsborg
{"title":"Joint effort: a call for standardization in total joint arthroplasty data reporting.","authors":"Alexander Y Liebeskind,&nbsp;Marc Nieuwenhuijse,&nbsp;Jensen H Hyde,&nbsp;Amanda C Chen,&nbsp;Suvekshya Aryal,&nbsp;Per-Henrik Randsborg","doi":"10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000079","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000079","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":33349,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f5/8e/bmjsit-2021-000079.PMC8647589.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39834978","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Call for emergency action to limit global temperature increases, restore biodiversity and protect health. 呼吁采取紧急行动,限制全球气温上升,恢复生物多样性,保护健康。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-09-01 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000112
Lukoye Atwoli, Abdullah H Baqui, Thomas Benfield, Raffaella Bosurgi, Fiona Godlee, Stephen Hancocks, Richard Horton, Laurie Laybourn-Langton, Carlos Augusto Monteiro, Ian Norman, Kirsten Patrick, Nigel Praities, Marcel Gm Olde Rikkert, Eric J Rubin, Peush Sahni, Richard Smith, Nicholas J Talley, Sue Turale, Damián Vázquez
{"title":"Call for emergency action to limit global temperature increases, restore biodiversity and protect health.","authors":"Lukoye Atwoli,&nbsp;Abdullah H Baqui,&nbsp;Thomas Benfield,&nbsp;Raffaella Bosurgi,&nbsp;Fiona Godlee,&nbsp;Stephen Hancocks,&nbsp;Richard Horton,&nbsp;Laurie Laybourn-Langton,&nbsp;Carlos Augusto Monteiro,&nbsp;Ian Norman,&nbsp;Kirsten Patrick,&nbsp;Nigel Praities,&nbsp;Marcel Gm Olde Rikkert,&nbsp;Eric J Rubin,&nbsp;Peush Sahni,&nbsp;Richard Smith,&nbsp;Nicholas J Talley,&nbsp;Sue Turale,&nbsp;Damián Vázquez","doi":"10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000112","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000112","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":33349,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8647603/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39924497","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How to tie dangerous surgical knots: easily. Can we avoid this? 如何打危险的手术结:很容易。我们能避免这种情况吗?
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-07-13 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000091
Eric Drabble, Sofia Spanopoulou, Eleni Sioka, Ellie Politaki, Ismini Paraskeva, Effrosyni Palla, Lauren Stockley, Dimitris Zacharoulis

Objective: Secure knots are essential in all areas of surgical, medical and veterinary practice. Our hypothesis was that technique of formation of each layer of a surgical knot was important to its security.

Design: Equal numbers of knots were tied, by each of three groups, using three techniques, for each of four suture materials; a standard flat reef knot (FRK), knots tied under tension (TK) and knots laid without appropriate hand crossing (NHCK). Each knot technique was performed reproducibly, and tested by distraction with increasing force, till each material broke or the knot separated completely.

Setting: Temporary knot tying laboratory.

Materials: The suture materials were, 2/0 polyglactin 910 (Vicryl), 3/0 polydioxanone, 4/0 poliglecaprone 25 (Monocryl) and 1 nylon (Ethilon).

Participants: Three groups comprised, a senior surgeon, a resident surgeon and three medical students.

Outcome measures: Proportion of each knot type that slipped, degree of slippage and length of suture held in loop secured by each knot type.

Results: 20% of FRK tied with all suture materials slipped; all knots tied with the other two techniques, with all materials, slipped, TK (100%) and NHCK (100%). The quantitative degree of slip was significantly less for FRK (mean 6.3%-, 95% CI 2.2% to 10.4%) than for TK (mean 312%, 95% CI 280.0% to 344.0%) and NHCK (mean 113.0%, -95% CI 94.3% to 131.0%).The mean length of suture in loops held within (FRK mean 25.1 mm 95% CI 24.2 to 26.0 mm) was significantly greater than mean lengths held by the other techniques (TK mean 17.0 mm, 95% CI 16.3 to 17.7 mm), (NHCK mean 16.3 mm, 95% CI 15.9 to 16.7 mm). The latter two types of knot may have tightened more than anticipated, in comparison to FRK, with potential undue tissue tension.

Conclusion: Meticulous technique of knot tying is essential for secure knots, appropriate tissue tension and the security of anastomoses and haemostasis effected.

目的:安全结是必不可少的所有领域的外科,医学和兽医实践。我们的假设是,每层手术结的形成技术对其安全性很重要。设计:四种缝合材料,三组各使用三种技术,打结数量相等;一个标准的平礁结(FRK),在张力下打结(TK)和打结没有适当的手交叉(NHCK)。每一种打结技术都是可重复的,并通过增加力的分散来测试,直到每一种材料断裂或打结完全分离。设置:临时打结实验室。材料:缝合材料为:2/0聚乳酸蛋白910 (Vicryl), 3/0聚二氧环酮,4/0聚戊二酮25 (Monocryl), 1尼龙(Ethilon)。参与者:由一名资深外科医生、一名住院外科医生和三名医科学生组成。结果测量:每个结类型滑动的比例,滑动的程度和缝线的长度,固定在每个结类型的环。结果:20%的FRK系紧,所有缝合材料滑落;所有结用其他两种技术打结,所有材料,滑,TK(100%)和NHCK(100%)。FRK的定量滑移程度(平均6.3%-,95% CI 2.2%至10.4%)明显小于TK(平均312%,95% CI 280.0%至344.0%)和NHCK(平均113.0%,-95% CI 94.3%至131.0%)。环内缝合的平均长度(FRK平均值为25.1 mm, 95% CI为24.2至26.0 mm)显著大于其他技术(TK平均值为17.0 mm, 95% CI为16.3至17.7 mm), (NHCK平均值为16.3 mm, 95% CI为15.9至16.7 mm)。后两种类型的结可能比预期的更紧,与FRK相比,潜在的不适当的组织张力。结论:严密的打结技术是保证结结牢固、组织张力适当、吻合口安全和止血效果的关键。
{"title":"How to tie dangerous surgical knots: easily. Can we avoid this?","authors":"Eric Drabble,&nbsp;Sofia Spanopoulou,&nbsp;Eleni Sioka,&nbsp;Ellie Politaki,&nbsp;Ismini Paraskeva,&nbsp;Effrosyni Palla,&nbsp;Lauren Stockley,&nbsp;Dimitris Zacharoulis","doi":"10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000091","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000091","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Secure knots are essential in all areas of surgical, medical and veterinary practice. Our hypothesis was that technique of formation of each layer of a surgical knot was important to its security.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Equal numbers of knots were tied, by each of three groups, using three techniques, for each of four suture materials; a standard flat reef knot (FRK), knots tied under tension (TK) and knots laid without appropriate hand crossing (NHCK). Each knot technique was performed reproducibly, and tested by distraction with increasing force, till each material broke or the knot separated completely.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Temporary knot tying laboratory.</p><p><strong>Materials: </strong>The suture materials were, 2/0 polyglactin 910 (Vicryl), 3/0 polydioxanone, 4/0 poliglecaprone 25 (Monocryl) and 1 nylon (Ethilon).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Three groups comprised, a senior surgeon, a resident surgeon and three medical students.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Proportion of each knot type that slipped, degree of slippage and length of suture held in loop secured by each knot type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>20% of FRK tied with all suture materials slipped; all knots tied with the other two techniques, with all materials, slipped, TK (100%) and NHCK (100%). The quantitative degree of slip was significantly less for FRK (mean 6.3%-, 95% CI 2.2% to 10.4%) than for TK (mean 312%, 95% CI 280.0% to 344.0%) and NHCK (mean 113.0%, -95% CI 94.3% to 131.0%).The mean length of suture in loops held within (FRK mean 25.1 mm 95% CI 24.2 to 26.0 mm) was significantly greater than mean lengths held by the other techniques (TK mean 17.0 mm, 95% CI 16.3 to 17.7 mm), (NHCK mean 16.3 mm, 95% CI 15.9 to 16.7 mm). The latter two types of knot may have tightened more than anticipated, in comparison to FRK, with potential undue tissue tension.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Meticulous technique of knot tying is essential for secure knots, appropriate tissue tension and the security of anastomoses and haemostasis effected.</p>","PeriodicalId":33349,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000091","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39924495","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Tissue stress from laparoscopic grasper use and bowel injury in humans: establishing intraoperative force boundaries. 腹腔镜握持器使用和人类肠道损伤的组织应力:建立术中力边界。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-07-05 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000084
Amanda Farah Khan, Matthew Kenneth MacDonald, Catherine Streutker, Corwyn Rowsell, James Drake, Teodor Grantcharov

Objectives: We aim to determine what threshold of compressive stress small bowel and colon tissues display evidence of significant tissue trauma during laparoscopic surgery.

Design: This study included 10 small bowel and 10 colon samples from patients undergoing routine gastrointestinal surgery. Each sample was compressed with pressures ranging from 100 kPa to 600 kPa. Two pathologists who were blinded to all study conditions, performed a histological analysis of the tissues. Experimentation: November 2018-February 2019. Analysis: March 2019-May 2020.

Setting: An inner-city trauma and ambulatory hospital with a 40-bed inpatient general surgery unit with a diverse patient population.

Participants: Patients were eligible if their surgery procured healthy tissue margins for experimentation (a convenience sample). 26 patient samples were procured; 6 samples were unusable. 10 colon and 10 small bowel samples were tested for a total of 120 experimental cases. No patients withdrew their consent.

Interventions: A novel device was created to induce compressive "grasps" to simulate those of a laparoscopic grasper. Experimentation was performed ex-vivo, in-vitro. Grasp conditions of 0-600 kPa for a duration of 10 s were used.

Results: Small bowel (10), M:F was 7:3, average age was 54.3 years. Colon (10), M:F was 1:1, average age was 65.2 years. All 20 patients experienced a significant difference (p<0.05) in serosal thickness post-compression at both 500 and 600 kPa for both tissue types. A logistic regression analysis with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 84.6% on a test set of data predicts a safety threshold of 329-330 kPa.

Conclusions: A threshold was discovered that corresponded to both significant serosal thickness change and a positive histological trauma score rating. This "force limit" could be used in novel sensorized laparoscopic tools to avoid intraoperative tissue injury.

目的:我们的目的是确定压应力的阈值小肠和结肠组织显示的证据在腹腔镜手术中显著的组织创伤。设计:本研究包括10例常规胃肠手术患者的小肠和结肠样本。每个样品都用100kpa到600kpa的压力进行压缩。两名对所有研究条件都不知情的病理学家对这些组织进行了组织学分析。实验:2018年11月至2019年2月。分析:2019年3月- 2020年5月。环境:市中心的创伤和流动医院,有40张床位的普通外科住院病房,有不同的患者群体。参与者:如果患者的手术获得了用于实验的健康组织边缘(方便样本),则符合条件。采集了26例患者样本;6个样品不可用。共对120例实验病例进行了10个结肠和10个小肠样本的检测。没有患者撤回他们的同意。干预措施:一种新的装置被创建来诱导压缩“抓取”,以模拟那些腹腔镜抓取器。实验在离体、体外进行。抓取条件为0- 600kpa,持续时间为10s。结果:小肠(10例),M:F为7:3,平均年龄54.3岁。结肠(10),M:F为1:1,平均年龄65.2岁。结论:发现了一个阈值,与显著的浆膜厚度变化和阳性的组织学创伤评分相对应。这种“力限制”可用于新型传感腹腔镜工具,以避免术中组织损伤。
{"title":"Tissue stress from laparoscopic grasper use and bowel injury in humans: establishing intraoperative force boundaries.","authors":"Amanda Farah Khan,&nbsp;Matthew Kenneth MacDonald,&nbsp;Catherine Streutker,&nbsp;Corwyn Rowsell,&nbsp;James Drake,&nbsp;Teodor Grantcharov","doi":"10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000084","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000084","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aim to determine what threshold of compressive stress small bowel and colon tissues display evidence of significant tissue trauma during laparoscopic surgery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study included 10 small bowel and 10 colon samples from patients undergoing routine gastrointestinal surgery. Each sample was compressed with pressures ranging from 100 kPa to 600 kPa. Two pathologists who were blinded to all study conditions, performed a histological analysis of the tissues. Experimentation: November 2018-February 2019. Analysis: March 2019-May 2020.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>An inner-city trauma and ambulatory hospital with a 40-bed inpatient general surgery unit with a diverse patient population.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients were eligible if their surgery procured healthy tissue margins for experimentation (a convenience sample). 26 patient samples were procured; 6 samples were unusable. 10 colon and 10 small bowel samples were tested for a total of 120 experimental cases. No patients withdrew their consent.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>A novel device was created to induce compressive \"grasps\" to simulate those of a laparoscopic grasper. Experimentation was performed ex-vivo, in-vitro. Grasp conditions of 0-600 kPa for a duration of 10 s were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Small bowel (10), M:F was 7:3, average age was 54.3 years. Colon (10), M:F was 1:1, average age was 65.2 years. All 20 patients experienced a significant difference (p<0.05) in serosal thickness post-compression at both 500 and 600 kPa for both tissue types. A logistic regression analysis with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 84.6% on a test set of data predicts a safety threshold of 329-330 kPa.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A threshold was discovered that corresponded to both significant serosal thickness change and a positive histological trauma score rating. This \"force limit\" could be used in novel sensorized laparoscopic tools to avoid intraoperative tissue injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":33349,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000084","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39834979","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
COVIDTrach: a prospective cohort study of mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 undergoing tracheostomy in the UK. covid - trach:一项针对英国接受气管切开术的COVID-19机械通气患者的前瞻性队列研究。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-07-01 Epub Date: 2021-07-08 DOI: 10.1136/bmjsit-2020-000077

Objectives: COVIDTrach is a UK multicentre prospective cohort study project that aims to evaluate the outcomes of tracheostomy in patients with COVID-19 receiving mechanical ventilation and record the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among healthcare workers involved in the procedure.

Design: Data on patient demographic, clinical history and outcomes were entered prospectively and updated over time via an online database (REDCap). Clinical variables were compared with outcomes, with logistic regression used to develop a model for mortality. Participants recorded whether any operators tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 within 2 weeks of the procedure.

Setting: UK National Health Service departments involved in treating patients with COVID-19 receiving mechanical ventilation.

Participants: The cohort comprised 1605 tracheostomy cases from 126 UK hospitals collected between 6 April and 26 August 2020.

Main outcome measures: Mortality following tracheostomy, successful wean from mechanical ventilation and length of time from tracheostomy to wean, discharge from hospital, complications from tracheostomy, reported SARS-CoV-2 infection among operators.

Results: The median time from intubation to tracheostomy was 15 days (IQR 11, 21). 285 (18%) patients died following the procedure. 1229 (93%) of the survivors had been successfully weaned from mechanical ventilation at censoring and 1049 (81%) had been discharged from hospital. Age, inspired oxygen concentration, positive end-expiratory pressure setting, fever, number of days of ventilation before tracheostomy, C reactive protein and the use of anticoagulation and inotropic support independently predicted mortality. Six reports were received of operators testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 within 2 weeks of the procedure.

Conclusions: Tracheostomy appears to be safe in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 and to operators performing the procedure and we identified clinical parameters that are predictive of mortality.

Trial registration number: The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.Gov (NCT04572438).

目的:covid - traach是英国一项多中心前瞻性队列研究项目,旨在评估接受机械通气的COVID-19患者气管切开术的结果,并记录参与该过程的医护人员中SARS-CoV-2感染的发生率。设计:前瞻性地输入患者人口统计学、临床病史和结果的数据,并通过在线数据库(REDCap)随时间更新。将临床变量与结果进行比较,并使用逻辑回归建立死亡率模型。参与者记录了在手术后两周内是否有任何操作人员的SARS-CoV-2检测呈阳性。背景:英国国家卫生服务部门参与治疗COVID-19机械通气患者。参与者:该队列包括2020年4月6日至8月26日期间从126家英国医院收集的1605例气管切开术病例。主要观察指标:气管切开术后死亡率、成功脱离机械通气和从气管切开术到断奶的时间、出院情况、气管切开术并发症、手术人员报告的SARS-CoV-2感染情况。结果:从插管到气管切开术的中位时间为15天(IQR 11,21)。285例(18%)患者在手术后死亡。1229例(93%)幸存者在检查时成功脱离机械通气,1049例(81%)出院。年龄、吸氧浓度、呼气末正压、发热、气管造口术前通气天数、C反应蛋白、抗凝和肌力支持的使用独立预测死亡率。在手术后两周内,收到了6份操作人员SARS-CoV-2检测呈阳性的报告。结论:气管切开术对于机械通气的COVID-19患者和操作人员似乎是安全的,并且我们确定了预测死亡率的临床参数。试验注册号:该研究已在ClinicalTrials注册。政府(NCT04572438)。
{"title":"COVIDTrach: a prospective cohort study of mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 undergoing tracheostomy in the UK.","authors":"","doi":"10.1136/bmjsit-2020-000077","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2020-000077","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>COVIDTrach is a UK multicentre prospective cohort study project that aims to evaluate the outcomes of tracheostomy in patients with COVID-19 receiving mechanical ventilation and record the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among healthcare workers involved in the procedure.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Data on patient demographic, clinical history and outcomes were entered prospectively and updated over time via an online database (REDCap). Clinical variables were compared with outcomes, with logistic regression used to develop a model for mortality. Participants recorded whether any operators tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 within 2 weeks of the procedure.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>UK National Health Service departments involved in treating patients with COVID-19 receiving mechanical ventilation.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The cohort comprised 1605 tracheostomy cases from 126 UK hospitals collected between 6 April and 26 August 2020.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Mortality following tracheostomy, successful wean from mechanical ventilation and length of time from tracheostomy to wean, discharge from hospital, complications from tracheostomy, reported SARS-CoV-2 infection among operators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median time from intubation to tracheostomy was 15 days (IQR 11, 21). 285 (18%) patients died following the procedure. 1229 (93%) of the survivors had been successfully weaned from mechanical ventilation at censoring and 1049 (81%) had been discharged from hospital. Age, inspired oxygen concentration, positive end-expiratory pressure setting, fever, number of days of ventilation before tracheostomy, C reactive protein and the use of anticoagulation and inotropic support independently predicted mortality. Six reports were received of operators testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 within 2 weeks of the procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tracheostomy appears to be safe in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 and to operators performing the procedure and we identified clinical parameters that are predictive of mortality.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.Gov (NCT04572438).</p>","PeriodicalId":33349,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/bmjsit-2020-000077","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39202021","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Meta-analysis with individual data of functional outcomes following Aquablation for lower urinary tract symptoms due to BPH in various prostate anatomies. 对不同前列腺解剖结构的前列腺增生引起的下尿路症状行水溶消融术后功能结果的个体数据进行meta分析。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-06-23 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000090
Dean Elterman, Peter Gilling, Claus Roehrborn, Neil Barber, Vincent Misrai, Kevin C Zorn, Naeem Bhojani, Alexis Te, Mitch Humphreys, Steven Kaplan, Mihir Desai, Thorsten Bach

Objectives: To evaluate functional outcomes following Aquablation in various prostate volume and anatomical subgroups.

Design: A meta-analysis with individual patient data undergoing Aquablation therapy from four prospective, global, clinical studies that have been conducted with Aquablation; WATER, WATER II, FRANCAIS WATER and OPEN WATER.

Setting: Australia, Canada, Lebanon, Germany, New Zealand, UK and the USA.

Participants: 425 men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with 1-year follow-up.

Interventions: Aquablation therapy is an ultrasound guided, robotically executed waterjet ablative procedure for the prostate.

Main outcome measures: The analyses focus International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), uroflowmetry, postoperative Incontinence Severity Index (ISI) and surgical retreatment.

Results: 425 men with prostates ranging in size from 20 to 150 mL underwent Aquablation therapy. The outcomes from the seven questions in the IPSS questionnaire were grouped by the following; prostates <100 mL, prostates ≥100 mL, prostate anatomy with an obstructive median lobe identifed by imaging, and prostate anatomy without an obstructive median lobe. Regardless of subgroup, all outcomes are consistent and demonstrate a significant improvement from baseline. Specifically, improvements in frequency, urgency and nocturia demonstrated bladder function improvement. Patients entering treatment with severe incontinence, ISI score >4, and regardless of prostate size, showed a reduction in incontinence during patient follow-up. Surgical retreatment due to BPH symptoms occurred in 0.7% (95% CI 0.1%-2.0%).

Conclusions: Across a variety of prostate anatomies, Aquablation therapy showed remarkable functional improvements following the index procedure. Additionally, men with moderate to severe LUTS/BPH and overactive bladder resulting in urge incontinence showed a reduction in incontinence symptoms postprocedure.

目的:评价不同前列腺体积和解剖亚群水合消融术后的功能结局。设计:一项荟萃分析,对接受水消融治疗的个体患者数据进行荟萃分析,这些数据来自四项使用水消融进行的前瞻性、全球性临床研究;水,水2,法国的水和开放的水。地点:澳大利亚、加拿大、黎巴嫩、德国、新西兰、英国和美国。参与者:425名因良性前列腺增生(BPH)而出现下尿路症状(LUTS)的男性,随访1年。干预措施:水消融治疗是一种超声引导,机器人执行的前列腺水射流消融程序。主要观察指标:国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、尿流测量、术后尿失禁严重程度指数(ISI)和手术再治疗。结果:425名前列腺大小在20 - 150ml的男性接受了水消融治疗。IPSS问卷中七个问题的结果按以下方式分组;前列腺,无论前列腺大小,在患者随访期间显示尿失禁的减少。因BPH症状再次手术治疗的患者占0.7% (95% CI 0.1%-2.0%)。结论:在各种前列腺解剖结构中,水消融治疗在指数手术后显示出显着的功能改善。此外,中度至重度LUTS/BPH和膀胱过度活动导致急迫性尿失禁的男性术后尿失禁症状减少。
{"title":"Meta-analysis with individual data of functional outcomes following Aquablation for lower urinary tract symptoms due to BPH in various prostate anatomies.","authors":"Dean Elterman,&nbsp;Peter Gilling,&nbsp;Claus Roehrborn,&nbsp;Neil Barber,&nbsp;Vincent Misrai,&nbsp;Kevin C Zorn,&nbsp;Naeem Bhojani,&nbsp;Alexis Te,&nbsp;Mitch Humphreys,&nbsp;Steven Kaplan,&nbsp;Mihir Desai,&nbsp;Thorsten Bach","doi":"10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000090","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000090","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate functional outcomes following Aquablation in various prostate volume and anatomical subgroups.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A meta-analysis with individual patient data undergoing Aquablation therapy from four prospective, global, clinical studies that have been conducted with Aquablation; WATER, WATER II, FRANCAIS WATER and OPEN WATER.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Australia, Canada, Lebanon, Germany, New Zealand, UK and the USA.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>425 men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with 1-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Aquablation therapy is an ultrasound guided, robotically executed waterjet ablative procedure for the prostate.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The analyses focus International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), uroflowmetry, postoperative Incontinence Severity Index (ISI) and surgical retreatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>425 men with prostates ranging in size from 20 to 150 mL underwent Aquablation therapy. The outcomes from the seven questions in the IPSS questionnaire were grouped by the following; prostates <100 mL, prostates ≥100 mL, prostate anatomy with an obstructive median lobe identifed by imaging, and prostate anatomy without an obstructive median lobe. Regardless of subgroup, all outcomes are consistent and demonstrate a significant improvement from baseline. Specifically, improvements in frequency, urgency and nocturia demonstrated bladder function improvement. Patients entering treatment with severe incontinence, ISI score >4, and regardless of prostate size, showed a reduction in incontinence during patient follow-up. Surgical retreatment due to BPH symptoms occurred in 0.7% (95% CI 0.1%-2.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Across a variety of prostate anatomies, Aquablation therapy showed remarkable functional improvements following the index procedure. Additionally, men with moderate to severe LUTS/BPH and overactive bladder resulting in urge incontinence showed a reduction in incontinence symptoms postprocedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":33349,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000090","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39924494","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Perceptions of partial gland ablation for prostate cancer among men on active surveillance: A qualitative study. 积极监测男性对前列腺癌部分腺体消融术的看法:定性研究。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI: 10.1136/bmjsit-2020-000068
Sonia S Hur, Michael Tzeng, Eliza Cricco-Lizza, Spyridon P Basourakos, Miko Yu, Jessica Ancker, Erika Abramson, Christopher Saigal, Ashley Ross, Jim Hu

Objectives –: Partial gland ablation (PGA) therapy is an emerging treatment modality that targets specific areas of biopsy proven prostate cancer (PCa) to minimize treatment-related morbidity by sparing benign prostate. This qualitative study aims to explore and characterize perceptions and attitudes toward PGA in men with very-low-risk, low-risk, and favorable intermediate-risk PCa on active surveillance (AS).

Design –: 92 men diagnosed with very-low-risk, low-risk, and favorable intermediate-risk PCa on AS were invited to participate in semi-structured telephone interviews on PGA.

Setting –: Single tertiary care center located in New York City.

Participants –: 20 men with very-low-risk, low-risk, and favorable intermediate-risk PCa on AS participated in the interviews.

Main outcome measures –: Emerging themes on perceptions and attitudes toward PGA were developed from transcripts inductively coded and analyzed under standardized methodology.

Results –: Four themes were derived from twenty interviews that represent the primary considerations in treatment decision-making: (1) the feeling of psychological safety associated with low-risk disease; (2) preference for minimally invasive treatments; (3) the central role of the physician; (4) and the pursuit of treatment options that align with disease severity. Eleven men (55%) expressed interest in pursuing PGA only if their cancer were to progress, while 9 men (45%) expressed interest at the current moment.

Conclusions –: Though an emerging treatment modality, patients were broadly accepting of PGA for PCa with men primarily debating the risks versus benefits of proactively treating low-risk disease. Additional research on men's preferences and attitudes toward PGA will further guide counseling and shared decision-making for PGA.

目的--:部分腺体消融(PGA)疗法是一种新兴的治疗方式,它针对活检证实的前列腺癌(PCa)的特定区域,通过保留良性前列腺最大限度地降低与治疗相关的发病率。这项定性研究旨在探讨和描述接受主动监测(AS)的极低风险、低风险和良好中度风险PCa男性患者对PGA的看法和态度。设计--:92名被诊断为极低风险、低风险和良好中度风险PCa的AS男性患者受邀参加关于PGA的半结构化电话访谈:参与人员 -:20 名患有极低风险、低风险和良好中度风险 PCa 的男性 AS 患者参加了访谈:根据标准化方法对记录誊本进行归纳编码和分析,得出对 PGA 的看法和态度的新主题:从二十次访谈中得出了四个主题,它们代表了治疗决策中的主要考虑因素:(1)与低风险疾病相关的心理安全感;(2)对微创治疗的偏好;(3)医生的核心作用;(4)追求与疾病严重程度相一致的治疗方案。11名男性(55%)表示只有在癌症进展时才有兴趣接受PGA治疗,而9名男性(45%)表示目前有兴趣:尽管PGA是一种新兴的治疗方式,但患者普遍接受PGA治疗PCa,男性患者主要在争论积极治疗低风险疾病的风险与收益。有关男性对 PGA 的偏好和态度的更多研究将进一步指导 PGA 的咨询和共同决策。
{"title":"Perceptions of partial gland ablation for prostate cancer among men on active surveillance: A qualitative study.","authors":"Sonia S Hur, Michael Tzeng, Eliza Cricco-Lizza, Spyridon P Basourakos, Miko Yu, Jessica Ancker, Erika Abramson, Christopher Saigal, Ashley Ross, Jim Hu","doi":"10.1136/bmjsit-2020-000068","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjsit-2020-000068","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives –: </strong>Partial gland ablation (PGA) therapy is an emerging treatment modality that targets specific areas of biopsy proven prostate cancer (PCa) to minimize treatment-related morbidity by sparing benign prostate. This qualitative study aims to explore and characterize perceptions and attitudes toward PGA in men with very-low-risk, low-risk, and favorable intermediate-risk PCa on active surveillance (AS).</p><p><strong>Design –: </strong>92 men diagnosed with very-low-risk, low-risk, and favorable intermediate-risk PCa on AS were invited to participate in semi-structured telephone interviews on PGA.</p><p><strong>Setting –: </strong>Single tertiary care center located in New York City.</p><p><strong>Participants –: </strong>20 men with very-low-risk, low-risk, and favorable intermediate-risk PCa on AS participated in the interviews.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures –: </strong>Emerging themes on perceptions and attitudes toward PGA were developed from transcripts inductively coded and analyzed under standardized methodology.</p><p><strong>Results –: </strong>Four themes were derived from twenty interviews that represent the primary considerations in treatment decision-making: (1) the feeling of psychological safety associated with low-risk disease; (2) preference for minimally invasive treatments; (3) the central role of the physician; (4) and the pursuit of treatment options that align with disease severity. Eleven men (55%) expressed interest in pursuing PGA only if their cancer were to progress, while 9 men (45%) expressed interest at the current moment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions –: </strong>Though an emerging treatment modality, patients were broadly accepting of PGA for PCa with men primarily debating the risks versus benefits of proactively treating low-risk disease. Additional research on men's preferences and attitudes toward PGA will further guide counseling and shared decision-making for PGA.</p>","PeriodicalId":33349,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/05/13/bmjsit-2020-000068.PMC8388575.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39365863","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Analysis of the relationship between surgeon procedure volume and complications after total knee arthroplasty using a propensity-matched cohort study. 使用倾向匹配队列研究分析全膝关节置换术后外科手术量与并发症的关系。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-04-02 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1136/bmjsit-2020-000072
Tosan Okoro, Sebastian Tomescu, J Michael Paterson, Bheeshma Ravi

Objectives: This study aimed to identify a threshold in annual surgeon volume associated with increased risk of revision (for any cause) and deep infection requiring surgery following primary elective total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Design: A propensity score matched cohort study.

Setting: Ontario, Canada.

Participants: 169 713 persons who received a primary TKA between 2002 and 2016, with 3-year postoperative follow-up.

Main outcome measures: Revision arthroplasty (for any cause), and the occurrence of deep surgical infection requiring surgery.

Results: Based on restricted cubic spline analysis, the threshold for increased probability of revision and deep infection requiring surgery was <70 cases/year. After matching of 51 658 TKA recipients from surgeons performing <70 cases/year to TKA recipients from surgeons with greater than 70 cases/year, patients in the former group had a higher rate of revision (for any cause, 2.23% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.39 to 3.07) vs 1.70% (95% CI 0.85 to 2.55); Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.33, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.47, p<0.0001) and deep infection requiring surgery (1.29% (95% CI 0.44 to 2.14) vs 1.09% (95% CI 0.24 to 1.94); HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.51, p<0.0001).

Conclusions: For primary TKA recipients, cases performed by surgeons who had performed fewer than 70 TKAs in the year prior to the index TKA were at 31% increased relative risk of revision (for any cause), and 18% increased relative risk for deep surgical infection requiring surgery, at 3-year follow-up.

目的:本研究旨在确定与原发性选择性全膝关节置换术(TKA)后翻修(任何原因)和需要手术的深度感染风险增加相关的年度手术量的阈值。设计:倾向评分匹配的队列研究。环境:加拿大安大略省。参与者:2002年至2016年间接受原发性TKA的169713人,术后随访3年。主要观察指标:关节翻修成形术(任何原因),以及需要手术的深部手术感染的发生。结果:基于限制性三次样条分析,翻修手术和需要手术的深度感染的可能性增加的阈值为:结论:对于原发性TKA受术者,在TKA指数前一年进行少于70次TKA的外科医生进行翻修手术的病例(任何原因)的相对风险增加31%,需要手术的深度手术感染的相对风险增加18%。
{"title":"Analysis of the relationship between surgeon procedure volume and complications after total knee arthroplasty using a propensity-matched cohort study.","authors":"Tosan Okoro,&nbsp;Sebastian Tomescu,&nbsp;J Michael Paterson,&nbsp;Bheeshma Ravi","doi":"10.1136/bmjsit-2020-000072","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2020-000072","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to identify a threshold in annual surgeon volume associated with increased risk of revision (for any cause) and deep infection requiring surgery following primary elective total knee arthroplasty (TKA).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A propensity score matched cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Ontario, Canada.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>169 713 persons who received a primary TKA between 2002 and 2016, with 3-year postoperative follow-up.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Revision arthroplasty (for any cause), and the occurrence of deep surgical infection requiring surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on restricted cubic spline analysis, the threshold for increased probability of revision and deep infection requiring surgery was <70 cases/year. After matching of 51 658 TKA recipients from surgeons performing <70 cases/year to TKA recipients from surgeons with greater than 70 cases/year, patients in the former group had a higher rate of revision (for any cause, 2.23% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.39 to 3.07) vs 1.70% (95% CI 0.85 to 2.55); Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.33, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.47, p<0.0001) and deep infection requiring surgery (1.29% (95% CI 0.44 to 2.14) vs 1.09% (95% CI 0.24 to 1.94); HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.51, p<0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For primary TKA recipients, cases performed by surgeons who had performed fewer than 70 TKAs in the year prior to the index TKA were at 31% increased relative risk of revision (for any cause), and 18% increased relative risk for deep surgical infection requiring surgery, at 3-year follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":33349,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/bmjsit-2020-000072","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39838726","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
期刊
BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1