The paper analyses the European Arrest Warrant which is based on the principle of mutual recognition and the principle of effective cooperation, which represent the foundations of judicial cooperation in criminal legal matters. The authors analyse whether there are obstacles to mutual recognition of decisions and how effective cooperation is when it comes to the European Arrest Warrant. The paper includes the conducted research regarding appeals against the European Arrest Warrant addressed to the Supreme Court and the High Criminal Court of the Republic of Croatia. The aim is to use a random sample to determine which criminal offenses are most often the subject of the European Arrest Warrant, as well as the number of rejections or acceptance of appeals against the European Arrest Warrant. In particular, by using the case study method, cases were analysed in which the appeal was accepted, i.e., to determine the shortcomings of the first instance courts in making decisions. According to the available data, an analysis was performed on the number of issued and executed warrants for individual countries from 2014 to 2018, which shows the functionality of the implementation.
{"title":"Implementation of the European Arrest Warrant","authors":"Dragana Čvorović, Hrvoje Filipović","doi":"10.5937/spz66-34190","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5937/spz66-34190","url":null,"abstract":"The paper analyses the European Arrest Warrant which is based on the principle of mutual recognition and the principle of effective cooperation, which represent the foundations of judicial cooperation in criminal legal matters. The authors analyse whether there are obstacles to mutual recognition of decisions and how effective cooperation is when it comes to the European Arrest Warrant. The paper includes the conducted research regarding appeals against the European Arrest Warrant addressed to the Supreme Court and the High Criminal Court of the Republic of Croatia. The aim is to use a random sample to determine which criminal offenses are most often the subject of the European Arrest Warrant, as well as the number of rejections or acceptance of appeals against the European Arrest Warrant. In particular, by using the case study method, cases were analysed in which the appeal was accepted, i.e., to determine the shortcomings of the first instance courts in making decisions. According to the available data, an analysis was performed on the number of issued and executed warrants for individual countries from 2014 to 2018, which shows the functionality of the implementation.","PeriodicalId":33817,"journal":{"name":"Strani pravni zivot","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71083574","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation) is a phenomenon that has been present around the world for decades, threatening various human rights and freedoms and undermining the very meaning and the purpose of judicial protection of rights. Considering that conducted research indicated a high probability of their presence in the Republic of Serbia, the aim of the paper is to present and analyze the notion of SLAPP, as well as to deliberate over some potential solutions that can be implemented in order to prevent use of this legal tool. After presenting numerous SLAPP examples from comparative case-law and analyzing the SLAPP concept, the paper turns to the rights that are most endangered by the submission of these lawsuits and provides an overview of relevant jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. Results of the research show not only that ratified international instruments require prevention of abuses embodied in SLAPP suits, but also that the real purpose of these lawsuits can be achieved by using other methods, that will be more complicated to suppress. Finally, given that the initiative to combat this legal anomaly has already been launched within the European Union, the paper concludes that the Republic of Serbia should use the momentum and start tackling this issue sooner rather than later.
SLAPP (Strategic lawsuit Against Public Participation，反对公众参与的战略诉讼)是几十年来在世界范围内存在的一种现象，它威胁着各种人权和自由，破坏了司法保护权利的意义和目的。考虑到所进行的研究表明它们在塞尔维亚共和国存在的可能性很大，本文的目的是提出和分析SLAPP的概念，并审议可以实施的一些潜在解决办法，以防止使用这一法律工具。本文从比较判例法中列举了大量SLAPP案例，并对SLAPP概念进行了分析，然后转向因这些诉讼的提交而最受威胁的权利，并概述了欧洲人权法院的相关判例。研究结果表明，已批准的国际文书不仅要求防止SLAPP诉讼所体现的滥用，而且这些诉讼的真正目的可以通过使用其他方法来实现，而这些方法将更加复杂。最后，鉴于已经在欧洲联盟内发起了打击这一法律异常现象的倡议，该文件的结论是，塞尔维亚共和国应利用这一势头，尽早开始处理这一问题。
{"title":"SLAPP: Abuse of the right to judicial protection with the aim of restricting freedom of expression","authors":"Ana Zdravković","doi":"10.5937/spz66-35644","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5937/spz66-35644","url":null,"abstract":"SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation) is a phenomenon that has been present around the world for decades, threatening various human rights and freedoms and undermining the very meaning and the purpose of judicial protection of rights. Considering that conducted research indicated a high probability of their presence in the Republic of Serbia, the aim of the paper is to present and analyze the notion of SLAPP, as well as to deliberate over some potential solutions that can be implemented in order to prevent use of this legal tool. After presenting numerous SLAPP examples from comparative case-law and analyzing the SLAPP concept, the paper turns to the rights that are most endangered by the submission of these lawsuits and provides an overview of relevant jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. Results of the research show not only that ratified international instruments require prevention of abuses embodied in SLAPP suits, but also that the real purpose of these lawsuits can be achieved by using other methods, that will be more complicated to suppress. Finally, given that the initiative to combat this legal anomaly has already been launched within the European Union, the paper concludes that the Republic of Serbia should use the momentum and start tackling this issue sooner rather than later.","PeriodicalId":33817,"journal":{"name":"Strani pravni zivot","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71083656","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In 2020 the European Commission presented its legislative package aimed to deal with new challenges for the internal market stemming from development on digital markets and alleged abuses and anticompetitive practices therein, including the Digital Markets Act (DMA). The aim of this paper is not to evaluate content of the DMA itself, but to evaluate the position of the DMA in the context of other market sector-oriented regulations , rules on unfair trade practices, competition rules as well as fitness of legal basis and observance of rule of law safeguards. As the DMA proposal departed from competition law legal basis enshrined in Art. 101 et seq. of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, it paved the way for the possibility to impose sanction under both regimes. This possibility of double sanctions and necessity for check of proportionality in all actions of the Commission as well as in imposition of fines constitute one of the most relevant shortcomings from the "constitutional" point of view of position of the DMA in the EU legal framework. As it is argued in this paper, without more synchronization with competition regulatory regimes, the DMA proposal contains elements that can, at the end of the day, diminish its legal effectiveness via subsequent judicial battles.
{"title":"The Digital Markets acts: Between market regulation, competition rules and unfair trade practices rules","authors":"Blažo Ondrej","doi":"10.5937/spz66-34993","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5937/spz66-34993","url":null,"abstract":"In 2020 the European Commission presented its legislative package aimed to deal with new challenges for the internal market stemming from development on digital markets and alleged abuses and anticompetitive practices therein, including the Digital Markets Act (DMA). The aim of this paper is not to evaluate content of the DMA itself, but to evaluate the position of the DMA in the context of other market sector-oriented regulations , rules on unfair trade practices, competition rules as well as fitness of legal basis and observance of rule of law safeguards. As the DMA proposal departed from competition law legal basis enshrined in Art. 101 et seq. of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, it paved the way for the possibility to impose sanction under both regimes. This possibility of double sanctions and necessity for check of proportionality in all actions of the Commission as well as in imposition of fines constitute one of the most relevant shortcomings from the \"constitutional\" point of view of position of the DMA in the EU legal framework. As it is argued in this paper, without more synchronization with competition regulatory regimes, the DMA proposal contains elements that can, at the end of the day, diminish its legal effectiveness via subsequent judicial battles.","PeriodicalId":33817,"journal":{"name":"Strani pravni zivot","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71083683","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The COVID-19 disease pandemic has opened a number of legal issues, one of which is the need to define COVID-19 as a possible consequence of performing work. In that sense, the question arose whether it could be qualified as an injury at work or as an occupational disease. When it comes to the comparative law, this need to put COVID-19 in a professional context has already been answered in various ways, and the wandering in that process (due to the complexity of the issue) is probably best illustrated by the fact that in some systems it takes on the nature of a legal chameleon that is adjusting itself to a sector of work or to a period of exposure to the virus. In the Republic of Serbia, on the other hand, the controversy on this issue is still ongoing - which is also the reason why a review of comparative legal experiences is necessary. And while the qualification of COVID-19 as an injury at work is problematic due to the fact that it is hard to define an event that could be characterized as an accident at work that produced such a consequence, the qualification of COVID-19 as an occupational disease encounters other problems. Most of those problems in the Republic of Serbia, on the other hand, are systemic in nature and, therefore, require fixes of the existing legal gaps and systematic changes of the existing regulations by the Serbian lawmaker. Additionally, when it comes to COVID-19, the one question that arises is the question of causality - having in mind that in this day and age we are all in contact with the SARS-CoV-2 virus to a greater or to a lesser extent. In that sense, occupational medicine will be entrusted with the difficult task of determining the occupational origin of this disease - since it does not seem fair to recognize the status of an occupational disease to an employee if there are reasonable suspicions on the matter whether the infection took place during his performance of his work tasks.
{"title":"Covid-19 disease: Injury at work or an occupational disease?","authors":"M. Petrović","doi":"10.5937/spz66-36145","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5937/spz66-36145","url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 disease pandemic has opened a number of legal issues, one of which is the need to define COVID-19 as a possible consequence of performing work. In that sense, the question arose whether it could be qualified as an injury at work or as an occupational disease. When it comes to the comparative law, this need to put COVID-19 in a professional context has already been answered in various ways, and the wandering in that process (due to the complexity of the issue) is probably best illustrated by the fact that in some systems it takes on the nature of a legal chameleon that is adjusting itself to a sector of work or to a period of exposure to the virus. In the Republic of Serbia, on the other hand, the controversy on this issue is still ongoing - which is also the reason why a review of comparative legal experiences is necessary. And while the qualification of COVID-19 as an injury at work is problematic due to the fact that it is hard to define an event that could be characterized as an accident at work that produced such a consequence, the qualification of COVID-19 as an occupational disease encounters other problems. Most of those problems in the Republic of Serbia, on the other hand, are systemic in nature and, therefore, require fixes of the existing legal gaps and systematic changes of the existing regulations by the Serbian lawmaker. Additionally, when it comes to COVID-19, the one question that arises is the question of causality - having in mind that in this day and age we are all in contact with the SARS-CoV-2 virus to a greater or to a lesser extent. In that sense, occupational medicine will be entrusted with the difficult task of determining the occupational origin of this disease - since it does not seem fair to recognize the status of an occupational disease to an employee if there are reasonable suspicions on the matter whether the infection took place during his performance of his work tasks.","PeriodicalId":33817,"journal":{"name":"Strani pravni zivot","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71083715","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Redress, in cases when the damage has been caused by uninsured or unidentified vehicle, in the United Kingdom is organized on specific manner. Task of providing compensation in such cases is entrusted to the organization Motor Insurers' Bureau (MIB). This task has been entrusted by agreements concluded between the state and MIB. Regardless of this specificity, MIB is a guarantee fund, an institute which exists in other European states. British courts expressed their stance on legal nature of MIB. Case-law of the United Kingdom earlier had considered that MIB was an institute of private law. Due to the influence of the Court of Justice of the European Union, a different stance has prevailed. Courts of Great Britain accepted arguments of the European judicial institution. Now they consider that MIB is a subject of the public law - emanation of the state. This standpoint has been implemented in the United Kingdom's law and will not be abandoned after the Brexit. The British example shows how the dilemma on the legal nature of a guarantee fund can be resolved in the country that is not a member of the European Union.
{"title":"Motor Insurers' Bureau: Guarantee fund in the United Kingdom","authors":"M. Radovanović","doi":"10.5937/spz66-34574","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5937/spz66-34574","url":null,"abstract":"Redress, in cases when the damage has been caused by uninsured or unidentified vehicle, in the United Kingdom is organized on specific manner. Task of providing compensation in such cases is entrusted to the organization Motor Insurers' Bureau (MIB). This task has been entrusted by agreements concluded between the state and MIB. Regardless of this specificity, MIB is a guarantee fund, an institute which exists in other European states. British courts expressed their stance on legal nature of MIB. Case-law of the United Kingdom earlier had considered that MIB was an institute of private law. Due to the influence of the Court of Justice of the European Union, a different stance has prevailed. Courts of Great Britain accepted arguments of the European judicial institution. Now they consider that MIB is a subject of the public law - emanation of the state. This standpoint has been implemented in the United Kingdom's law and will not be abandoned after the Brexit. The British example shows how the dilemma on the legal nature of a guarantee fund can be resolved in the country that is not a member of the European Union.","PeriodicalId":33817,"journal":{"name":"Strani pravni zivot","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71083621","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The paper analyses the rights of members of closed companies originating from common law - drag along and tag along rights. Since they represent effective instrument of prevention of second agency problem of corporate governance, relating to the conflict of interest between majority and minority shareholder, as well as for resolving conflicts between members that may occur in case of the sale of a company's share, these rights were introduced in civil law countries as well. In recent years, drag along and tag along rights have become more significant in domestic practice, since they are often contracted between members of domestic companies. For this reason, it is important to understand the purpose of these rights and the interests that are protected by them. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to explain the concept and purpose of drag along and tag along rights.
{"title":"Basic aspects of drag along and tag along rights","authors":"Amina Kajević","doi":"10.5937/spz66-35036","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5937/spz66-35036","url":null,"abstract":"The paper analyses the rights of members of closed companies originating from common law - drag along and tag along rights. Since they represent effective instrument of prevention of second agency problem of corporate governance, relating to the conflict of interest between majority and minority shareholder, as well as for resolving conflicts between members that may occur in case of the sale of a company's share, these rights were introduced in civil law countries as well. In recent years, drag along and tag along rights have become more significant in domestic practice, since they are often contracted between members of domestic companies. For this reason, it is important to understand the purpose of these rights and the interests that are protected by them. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to explain the concept and purpose of drag along and tag along rights.","PeriodicalId":33817,"journal":{"name":"Strani pravni zivot","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71083587","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The concept of national human rights institutions (NHRIs) as known today originated under the auspices of the United Nations. Although national human rights institutions in the contemporary context have been the subject of a growing body of literature, the evolutionary path of the very idea of their creation has remained largely unexplored. The aim of this paper is to fill this literature gap by analysing key United Nations documents from the end of World War II to the adoption of the 1978 Geneva Guidelines. The paper reveals how the very concept of national human rights institutions had evolved over time, how it had been understood, which functions had been tied to these institutions, and which organizational forms had been taken as models. The paper explores the changes in the attitudes of UN Member States in relation to a given issue and provides a better understanding of the context in which this idea developed. In this regard, the paper also offers new insights into how the process of negotiating the core UN human rights conventions has influenced the evolution of the idea of creating national human rights institutions, a factor that has been rarely considered.
{"title":"The evolution of the idea of national human rights institutions: From the first drawing to the Geneva guidelines (1946-1978)","authors":"Luka Glušac","doi":"10.5937/spz66-36226","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5937/spz66-36226","url":null,"abstract":"The concept of national human rights institutions (NHRIs) as known today originated under the auspices of the United Nations. Although national human rights institutions in the contemporary context have been the subject of a growing body of literature, the evolutionary path of the very idea of their creation has remained largely unexplored. The aim of this paper is to fill this literature gap by analysing key United Nations documents from the end of World War II to the adoption of the 1978 Geneva Guidelines. The paper reveals how the very concept of national human rights institutions had evolved over time, how it had been understood, which functions had been tied to these institutions, and which organizational forms had been taken as models. The paper explores the changes in the attitudes of UN Member States in relation to a given issue and provides a better understanding of the context in which this idea developed. In this regard, the paper also offers new insights into how the process of negotiating the core UN human rights conventions has influenced the evolution of the idea of creating national human rights institutions, a factor that has been rarely considered.","PeriodicalId":33817,"journal":{"name":"Strani pravni zivot","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71083819","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Although the Constitution of the Republic of Srpska was created in extremely complex circumstances, exposed to multiple, often violent changes, the underlined constitutional concept of the organization of power and the position of the President of the Republic remained unchanged. Thanks to that fact, the Constitution of the Republic of Srpska confirmed its vitality, and enabled the stable functioning of the state government. Although the semi-presidential system (of power) implies certain elements common to all variants, there are numerous specifics of its different manifestations. In this regard, one can observe the position of the President of the Republic of Srpska, who, in addition to immediate legitimacy, has vast and independent powers, which make him the true head of the executive branch. In light of these characteristics of the position of the President of the Republic, one can speak of a stronger semi-presidential form of government. Having in mind determinism of existing solutions, the similarity with comparative models, and bearing in mind certain specifics, the author is of the opinion that established solution should not be changed.
{"title":"Constitutional position of the President of the Republic of Srpska in the light of comparative law","authors":"Darko Golić","doi":"10.5937/spz65-31015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5937/spz65-31015","url":null,"abstract":"Although the Constitution of the Republic of Srpska was created in extremely complex circumstances, exposed to multiple, often violent changes, the underlined constitutional concept of the organization of power and the position of the President of the Republic remained unchanged. Thanks to that fact, the Constitution of the Republic of Srpska confirmed its vitality, and enabled the stable functioning of the state government. Although the semi-presidential system (of power) implies certain elements common to all variants, there are numerous specifics of its different manifestations. In this regard, one can observe the position of the President of the Republic of Srpska, who, in addition to immediate legitimacy, has vast and independent powers, which make him the true head of the executive branch. In light of these characteristics of the position of the President of the Republic, one can speak of a stronger semi-presidential form of government. Having in mind determinism of existing solutions, the similarity with comparative models, and bearing in mind certain specifics, the author is of the opinion that established solution should not be changed.","PeriodicalId":33817,"journal":{"name":"Strani pravni zivot","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46770653","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In this paper the rights of employees and self-employed persons and the distinction between them are analysed, with the special focus on dismissal protection. Using the comparative and normative method, the author analyses these legal questions in legal systems in Spain, Austria, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Nothern Ireland, and the United States of America, including the existence of the mid-category of semi-dependent self-employed persons in the first three abovementioned jurisdictions and practical consequences of their existence. Dismissal protection of self-employed persons represents a legal question that is not sufficiently researched in comparison to the dismissal protection of employees. The hypothesis of the author in this paper has been based on the opinion that self-employed persons who work for others are justifiably deprived of dismissal protection, unlike semi-dependent self-employed persons who are unjustifiably deprived of it, especially because the second mentioned category does not experience entrepreneurial risks and chances. Also, the question of dismissal protection of self-employed persons is very relevant when we consider the amount of misuse of this occurrence and cost savings which employers often have when employing them. In the end, de lege ferenda solutions and their implications for other legal systems are proposed by the author of the paper.
{"title":"(Un)justified application of labour law rules of dismissal protection on self-employed persons","authors":"Katarina Vidanović","doi":"10.5937/spz65-31865","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5937/spz65-31865","url":null,"abstract":"In this paper the rights of employees and self-employed persons and the distinction between them are analysed, with the special focus on dismissal protection. Using the comparative and normative method, the author analyses these legal questions in legal systems in Spain, Austria, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Nothern Ireland, and the United States of America, including the existence of the mid-category of semi-dependent self-employed persons in the first three abovementioned jurisdictions and practical consequences of their existence. Dismissal protection of self-employed persons represents a legal question that is not sufficiently researched in comparison to the dismissal protection of employees. The hypothesis of the author in this paper has been based on the opinion that self-employed persons who work for others are justifiably deprived of dismissal protection, unlike semi-dependent self-employed persons who are unjustifiably deprived of it, especially because the second mentioned category does not experience entrepreneurial risks and chances. Also, the question of dismissal protection of self-employed persons is very relevant when we consider the amount of misuse of this occurrence and cost savings which employers often have when employing them. In the end, de lege ferenda solutions and their implications for other legal systems are proposed by the author of the paper.","PeriodicalId":33817,"journal":{"name":"Strani pravni zivot","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48390004","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This erratum concerns a correction in the article KONTROLA STRANIH DIREKTNIH INVESTICIJA U PRAVU EU U USLOVIMA KRIZE IZAZVANE PANDEMIJOM published in Strani pravni život, Vol 65, no. 3, 2021, pp. 361-374 (doi: 10.5937/spz65-33936). On page 361 in the course of editorial process a footnote was omitted. The missing footnote should state the following: ** Rad predstavlja rezultat projekta Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu "Epidemija. Pravo. Društvo" za 2021. godinu. The corrected version of the article was published on the website of the journal: http://www.stranipravnizivot.rs/index.php/SPZ/article/view/837/802. The error lies solely on the editorial board, and the author bears no responsibility. We would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
该勘误表涉及对发表在Strani pravniživot，第65卷，2021年第3期，第361-374页（doi:10.5937/spz65-33936）的文章KONTROLA STRANIH DIREKTNIH INVESTICIJA U PRAVU EU U USLOVIMA KRIZE IZAZVANE PANDEMIJOM的更正。在编辑过程中，第361页省略了脚注。缺失的脚注应说明以下内容：**Rad predstavlja rezultat projekta Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu“Epidemija.Pravo.Društvo”za 2021。godinu。这篇文章的更正版本发表在该杂志的网站上：http://www.stranipravnizivot.rs/index.php/SPZ/article/view/837/802.错误完全在于编辑委员会，作者不承担任何责任。对于由此给您带来的不便，我们深表歉意。
{"title":"Erratum: Kontrola stranih direktnih investicija u pravu EU u uslovima krize izazvane pandemijom (2021, Vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 361-374)","authors":"U. Uredništvo","doi":"10.5937/spz2104715u","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5937/spz2104715u","url":null,"abstract":"This erratum concerns a correction in the article KONTROLA STRANIH DIREKTNIH INVESTICIJA U PRAVU EU U USLOVIMA KRIZE IZAZVANE PANDEMIJOM published in Strani pravni život, Vol 65, no. 3, 2021, pp. 361-374 (doi: 10.5937/spz65-33936). On page 361 in the course of editorial process a footnote was omitted. The missing footnote should state the following: ** Rad predstavlja rezultat projekta Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu \"Epidemija. Pravo. Društvo\" za 2021. godinu. The corrected version of the article was published on the website of the journal: http://www.stranipravnizivot.rs/index.php/SPZ/article/view/837/802. The error lies solely on the editorial board, and the author bears no responsibility. We would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.","PeriodicalId":33817,"journal":{"name":"Strani pravni zivot","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71080845","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：