首页 > 最新文献

Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow最新文献

英文 中文
Does humeral fixation technique affect long-term outcomes of total shoulder arthroplasty? 肱骨固定技术是否影响全肩关节置换术的远期疗效?
Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.5397/cise.2023.00199
Troy Li, Kenneth H Levy, Akiro H Duey, Akshar V Patel, Christopher A White, Carl M Cirino, Alexis Williams, Kathryn Whitelaw, Dave Shukla, Bradford O Parsons, Evan L Flatow, Paul J Cagle

Background: For anatomic total arthroscopic repair, cementless humeral fixation has recently gained popularity. However, few studies have compared clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes between cemented and press-fit humeral fixation, and none have performed follow-up for longer than 5 years. In this study, we compared long-term postoperative outcomes in patients receiving a cemented versus press-fit humeral stem anatomic arthroscopic repair.

Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 169 shoulders that required primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA). Shoulders were stratified by humeral stem fixation technique: cementation or press-fit. Data were collected pre- and postoperatively. Primary outcome measures included range of motion, patient reported outcomes, and radiographic measures.

Results: One hundred thirty-eight cemented humeral stems and 31 press-fit stems were included. Significant improvements in range of motion were seen in all aTSA patients with no significant differences between final cemented and press-fit stems (forward elevation: P=0.12, external rotation: P=0.60, and internal rotation: P=0.77). Patient reported outcome metrics also exhibited sustained improvement through final follow-up. However, at final follow-up, the press-fit stem cohort had significantly better overall scores when compared to the cemented cohort (visual analog score: P=0.04, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon Score: P<0.01, Simple Shoulder Test score: P=0.03). Humeral radiolucency was noted in two cemented implants and one press-fit implant. No significant differences in implant survival were observed between the two cohorts (P=0.75).

Conclusions: In this series, we found that irrespective of humeral fixation technique, aTSA significantly improves shoulder function. However, within this cohort, press-fit stems provided significantly better outcomes than cemented stems in terms of patient reported outcome scores. Level of evidence: III.

背景:在解剖全关节镜下修复中,无骨水泥肱骨固定最近越来越受欢迎。然而,很少有研究比较骨水泥和加压肱骨固定术的临床、影像学和患者报告的结果,也没有研究进行超过5年的随访。在这项研究中,我们比较了接受骨水泥和加压肱骨干解剖关节镜修复的患者的长期术后结果。方法:本研究回顾性分析了169例需要一期解剖性全肩关节置换术(aTSA)的肩关节。肩胛骨分层采用肱骨干固定技术:骨水泥或压合。收集术前和术后资料。主要结果测量包括活动范围、患者报告的结果和x线测量。结果:共纳入138例骨水泥肱骨柄和31例压合肱骨柄。所有aTSA患者的活动范围均有显著改善,最终骨水泥和压入式假体间无显著差异(前举:P=0.12,外旋:P=0.60,内旋:P=0.77)。患者报告的结果指标在最终随访中也显示出持续的改善。然而,在最后的随访中,与骨水泥组相比,加压支架组的总体评分明显更好(视觉模拟评分:P=0.04,美国肩关节外科医生评分:P)。结论:在本系列研究中,我们发现无论采用何种肱骨固定技术,aTSA均可显著改善肩关节功能。然而,在该队列中,就患者报告的结果评分而言,压合支架的效果明显好于骨水泥支架。证据水平:III。
{"title":"Does humeral fixation technique affect long-term outcomes of total shoulder arthroplasty?","authors":"Troy Li,&nbsp;Kenneth H Levy,&nbsp;Akiro H Duey,&nbsp;Akshar V Patel,&nbsp;Christopher A White,&nbsp;Carl M Cirino,&nbsp;Alexis Williams,&nbsp;Kathryn Whitelaw,&nbsp;Dave Shukla,&nbsp;Bradford O Parsons,&nbsp;Evan L Flatow,&nbsp;Paul J Cagle","doi":"10.5397/cise.2023.00199","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5397/cise.2023.00199","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For anatomic total arthroscopic repair, cementless humeral fixation has recently gained popularity. However, few studies have compared clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes between cemented and press-fit humeral fixation, and none have performed follow-up for longer than 5 years. In this study, we compared long-term postoperative outcomes in patients receiving a cemented versus press-fit humeral stem anatomic arthroscopic repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study retrospectively analyzed 169 shoulders that required primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA). Shoulders were stratified by humeral stem fixation technique: cementation or press-fit. Data were collected pre- and postoperatively. Primary outcome measures included range of motion, patient reported outcomes, and radiographic measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred thirty-eight cemented humeral stems and 31 press-fit stems were included. Significant improvements in range of motion were seen in all aTSA patients with no significant differences between final cemented and press-fit stems (forward elevation: P=0.12, external rotation: P=0.60, and internal rotation: P=0.77). Patient reported outcome metrics also exhibited sustained improvement through final follow-up. However, at final follow-up, the press-fit stem cohort had significantly better overall scores when compared to the cemented cohort (visual analog score: P=0.04, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon Score: P<0.01, Simple Shoulder Test score: P=0.03). Humeral radiolucency was noted in two cemented implants and one press-fit implant. No significant differences in implant survival were observed between the two cohorts (P=0.75).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this series, we found that irrespective of humeral fixation technique, aTSA significantly improves shoulder function. However, within this cohort, press-fit stems provided significantly better outcomes than cemented stems in terms of patient reported outcome scores. Level of evidence: III.</p>","PeriodicalId":33981,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow","volume":"26 3","pages":"245-251"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0c/14/cise-2023-00199.PMC10497929.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10241787","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mid- to long-term success rate and functional outcomes of acromioclavicular injections in patients with acromioclavicular osteoarthritis. 肩锁骨关节炎患者肩锁骨注射的中长期成功率和功能结局。
Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.5397/cise.2023.00031
Nienke Miedema, Inger Sierevelt, Tjarco Dirk Willem Alta, Roderick Jan Maximiliaan Vossen, Arthur van Noort

Background: Acromioclavicular (AC) osteoarthritis (OA) is a frequent pathology of the shoulder in elderly patients. Drug injection plays an important role in treatment of AC OA. Literature has demonstrated excellent short-term results regarding shoulder function and pain. However, mid- to long-term results are lacking. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of a single intra-articular AC injection in patients with AC OA and to identify predictive factors for success.

Methods: A retrospective study was performed to analyze success rate, shoulder function, and pain perception after a single intra-articular injection in patients with AC OA. Success was defined as the absence of reinterventions such as additional injection or surgery. Outcome measures were 1-year success rate and clinical outcome scores of Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain, Oxford Shoulder Score, and Subjective Shoulder Value.

Results: Ninety-eight patients participated in this study. At a median final follow-up of 0.8 years (interquartile range, 0-6), 57 of these patients (58%) had undergone a reintervention. The 1-year success rate was 47% (95% confidence interval, 37%-57%), with NRS at rest as the sole factor significantly associated with success. Thirty patients not requiring reintervention reported significant improvement from baseline for all reported outcome measures at final follow-up.

Conclusions: AC injections offer a 1-year success rate of 47%. The AC injection produces good mid- to long-term clinical outcomes regarding shoulder function, quality of life, and pain perception in one-third of patients. Further research is essential to analyze mid- to longterm outcomes of AC injections. Level of evidence: Level IV.

背景:肩锁骨关节炎(AC)是一种常见的老年肩关节病变。药物注射在AC - OA的治疗中起着重要作用。文献证明了短期内对肩部功能和疼痛的良好治疗效果。然而,缺乏中长期的结果。本研究的目的是评估单次关节内注射AC对AC OA患者的疗效,并确定成功的预测因素。方法:回顾性研究分析AC OA患者单次关节内注射后的成功率、肩关节功能和疼痛感觉。成功的定义是没有再干预,如额外的注射或手术。结果测量为1年成功率、疼痛数值评定量表(NRS)临床结果评分、牛津肩部评分和主观肩部值。结果:98例患者参与本研究。在中位最终随访0.8年(四分位数范围0-6)时,其中57名患者(58%)接受了再干预。1年的成功率为47%(95%可信区间,37%-57%),静止状态下的NRS是唯一与成功率显著相关的因素。30例不需要再干预的患者在最后随访时报告所有报告的结果测量值较基线有显著改善。结论:交流电注射1年成功率为47%。在三分之一的患者中,AC注射在肩关节功能、生活质量和疼痛感知方面产生了良好的中长期临床结果。进一步的研究分析AC注射的中长期结果是必要的。证据等级:四级。
{"title":"Mid- to long-term success rate and functional outcomes of acromioclavicular injections in patients with acromioclavicular osteoarthritis.","authors":"Nienke Miedema,&nbsp;Inger Sierevelt,&nbsp;Tjarco Dirk Willem Alta,&nbsp;Roderick Jan Maximiliaan Vossen,&nbsp;Arthur van Noort","doi":"10.5397/cise.2023.00031","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5397/cise.2023.00031","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acromioclavicular (AC) osteoarthritis (OA) is a frequent pathology of the shoulder in elderly patients. Drug injection plays an important role in treatment of AC OA. Literature has demonstrated excellent short-term results regarding shoulder function and pain. However, mid- to long-term results are lacking. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of a single intra-articular AC injection in patients with AC OA and to identify predictive factors for success.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was performed to analyze success rate, shoulder function, and pain perception after a single intra-articular injection in patients with AC OA. Success was defined as the absence of reinterventions such as additional injection or surgery. Outcome measures were 1-year success rate and clinical outcome scores of Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain, Oxford Shoulder Score, and Subjective Shoulder Value.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-eight patients participated in this study. At a median final follow-up of 0.8 years (interquartile range, 0-6), 57 of these patients (58%) had undergone a reintervention. The 1-year success rate was 47% (95% confidence interval, 37%-57%), with NRS at rest as the sole factor significantly associated with success. Thirty patients not requiring reintervention reported significant improvement from baseline for all reported outcome measures at final follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AC injections offer a 1-year success rate of 47%. The AC injection produces good mid- to long-term clinical outcomes regarding shoulder function, quality of life, and pain perception in one-third of patients. Further research is essential to analyze mid- to longterm outcomes of AC injections. Level of evidence: Level IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":33981,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow","volume":"26 2","pages":"175-181"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9b/38/cise-2023-00031.PMC10277705.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9659854","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Isolated acromioclavicular osteoarthritis and steroid injection. 孤立肩锁骨关节炎和类固醇注射。
Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.5397/cise.2023.00311
Jin Woong Yi
vial joint that aids in raising the arm over the head and rotates minimally in all directions [1]. The AC joint is conspicuously smaller than the glenohumeral joint and is referred to as the forgotten joint [2]. Primary osteoarthritic change of the AC joint is a common degenerative change typically seen in middle-aged or elderly patients [3]. But secondary osteoarthritis, mainly following traumas such as joint sprains or distal clavicular fractures, appears to be even more common than primary osteoarthritis [4]. A study found that 54%–57% of elderly patients had X-ray evidence of degenerative changes in the AC joint [5]. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most powerful diagnostic tool for detecting osteoarthritic change in the AC joint [6]. There are many parameters for describing AC joint osteoarthritis (ACJOA) in an image. Joo et al. [7] said that the cross-sectional area of the AC joint seems to be a sensitive image parameter for ACJOA. However, some authors believe that image results have a poor correlation with clinical symptoms. Rajagopalan et al. [8] claimed that MRI characteristics in ACJOA are so prevalent that they can be considered a universal aspect of human aging, but imaging cannot be used as a reference standard to assess the reliability and accuracy of various symptoms and signs for diagnosis of symptomatic ACJOA. Symptomatic ACJOA is a relatively easy diagnosis clinically, presenting as pain localized at the lateral end of the clavicle that is exacerbated with cross-body adduction or with active contraction of the pectoralis major. In cases where differential diagnosis is difficult, local anesthetic injection into the AC joint or subacromial bursa can be helpful. Conservative therapy is the first option for shoulder pain caused by ACJOA, while surgical therapy, whether open or arthroscopic, is reserved only for patients who do not improve with conservative therapy [9]. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medication and injections are commonly used modalities for conservative treatment of ACJOA or other joint diseases. The agent used for (intra-articular) injection include steroids, hyaluronic acid, and mesenchymal stem cells [10,11]. Steroid injection shows good short-term results but relatively poor midand longterm outcomes. Thus, it remains unclear which site should be targeted for the steroid injection to achieve good clinical outcomes in ACJOA. For frozen shoulder, there are reports suggesting no significant difference in clinical outcomes between subacromial space and intra-articular injections [12,13]. This is explained by the location of the pathology causing symptoms. A meta-analysis about wrist joints has suggested that the variability in clinical outcomes after steroid injections might be due to inclusion of cases where the steroid was unintentionally injected in extra-articular space [14]. Katt et al. [15] reported that intra-articular injections into the carpometacarpal joint guided by fluoroscopy demonstrated superio
{"title":"Isolated acromioclavicular osteoarthritis and steroid injection.","authors":"Jin Woong Yi","doi":"10.5397/cise.2023.00311","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5397/cise.2023.00311","url":null,"abstract":"vial joint that aids in raising the arm over the head and rotates minimally in all directions [1]. The AC joint is conspicuously smaller than the glenohumeral joint and is referred to as the forgotten joint [2]. Primary osteoarthritic change of the AC joint is a common degenerative change typically seen in middle-aged or elderly patients [3]. But secondary osteoarthritis, mainly following traumas such as joint sprains or distal clavicular fractures, appears to be even more common than primary osteoarthritis [4]. A study found that 54%–57% of elderly patients had X-ray evidence of degenerative changes in the AC joint [5]. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most powerful diagnostic tool for detecting osteoarthritic change in the AC joint [6]. There are many parameters for describing AC joint osteoarthritis (ACJOA) in an image. Joo et al. [7] said that the cross-sectional area of the AC joint seems to be a sensitive image parameter for ACJOA. However, some authors believe that image results have a poor correlation with clinical symptoms. Rajagopalan et al. [8] claimed that MRI characteristics in ACJOA are so prevalent that they can be considered a universal aspect of human aging, but imaging cannot be used as a reference standard to assess the reliability and accuracy of various symptoms and signs for diagnosis of symptomatic ACJOA. Symptomatic ACJOA is a relatively easy diagnosis clinically, presenting as pain localized at the lateral end of the clavicle that is exacerbated with cross-body adduction or with active contraction of the pectoralis major. In cases where differential diagnosis is difficult, local anesthetic injection into the AC joint or subacromial bursa can be helpful. Conservative therapy is the first option for shoulder pain caused by ACJOA, while surgical therapy, whether open or arthroscopic, is reserved only for patients who do not improve with conservative therapy [9]. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medication and injections are commonly used modalities for conservative treatment of ACJOA or other joint diseases. The agent used for (intra-articular) injection include steroids, hyaluronic acid, and mesenchymal stem cells [10,11]. Steroid injection shows good short-term results but relatively poor midand longterm outcomes. Thus, it remains unclear which site should be targeted for the steroid injection to achieve good clinical outcomes in ACJOA. For frozen shoulder, there are reports suggesting no significant difference in clinical outcomes between subacromial space and intra-articular injections [12,13]. This is explained by the location of the pathology causing symptoms. A meta-analysis about wrist joints has suggested that the variability in clinical outcomes after steroid injections might be due to inclusion of cases where the steroid was unintentionally injected in extra-articular space [14]. Katt et al. [15] reported that intra-articular injections into the carpometacarpal joint guided by fluoroscopy demonstrated superio","PeriodicalId":33981,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow","volume":"26 2","pages":"107-108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/85/54/cise-2023-00311.PMC10277703.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9666259","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An objective assessment of the impact of tendon retraction on sleep efficiency in patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears: a prospective cohort study. 一项前瞻性队列研究,客观评估肌腱牵拉对全层肩袖撕裂患者睡眠效率的影响。
Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.5397/cise.2022.01438
Ashley E MacConnell, William Davis, Rebecca Burr, Andrew Schneider, Lara R Dugas, Cara Joyce, Dane H Salazar, Nickolas G Garbis

Background: Sleep quality, quantity, and efficiency have all been demonstrated to be adversely affected by rotator cuff pathology. Previous measures of assessing the impact of rotator cuff pathology on sleep have been largely subjective in nature. This study was undertaken to objectively analyze this relationship through the use of activity monitors.

Methods: Patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears at a single institution were prospectively enrolled between 2018 and 2020. Waistworn accelerometers were provided for the patients to use each night for 14 days. Sleep efficiency was calculated using the ratio of the time spent sleeping to the total amount of time that was spent in bed. Retraction of the rotator cuff tear was classified using the Patte staging system.

Results: This study included 36 patients: 18 with Patte stage 1 disease, 14 with Patte stage 2 disease, and 4 patients with Patte stage 3 disease. During the study, 25 participants wore the monitor on multiple nights, and ultimately their data was used for the analysis. No difference in the median sleep efficiency was appreciated amongst these groups (P>0.1), with each cohort of patients demonstrating a generally high sleep efficiency.

Conclusions: The severity of retraction of the rotator cuff tear did not appear to correlate with changes in sleep efficiency for patients (P>0.1). These findings can better inform providers on how to counsel their patients who present with complaints of poor sleep in the setting of full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Level of evidence: Level II.

背景:睡眠质量、睡眠时间和睡眠效率都被证明会受到肩袖病变的不利影响。以前评估肩袖病变对睡眠影响的方法在很大程度上是主观的。本研究旨在通过使用活动监测仪客观地分析这种关系。方法:2018年至2020年期间,在单一机构前瞻性纳入全层肩袖撕裂患者。提供马甲加速度计供患者每晚使用,持续14天。睡眠效率是用睡眠时间与在床上的总时间之比来计算的。使用Patte分期系统对肩袖撕裂后缩回进行分类。结果:本研究共纳入36例患者,其中1期18例,2期14例,3期4例。在研究期间,25名参与者在多个晚上佩戴监测器,最终他们的数据被用于分析。在这些组中,睡眠效率的中位数没有差异(P>0.1),每组患者都表现出普遍较高的睡眠效率。结论:肩袖撕裂后缩回的严重程度似乎与患者睡眠效率的变化无关(P>0.1)。这些发现可以更好地告知医护人员如何在肩袖全层撕裂的情况下,对那些抱怨睡眠质量差的患者进行咨询。证据等级:二级。
{"title":"An objective assessment of the impact of tendon retraction on sleep efficiency in patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears: a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Ashley E MacConnell,&nbsp;William Davis,&nbsp;Rebecca Burr,&nbsp;Andrew Schneider,&nbsp;Lara R Dugas,&nbsp;Cara Joyce,&nbsp;Dane H Salazar,&nbsp;Nickolas G Garbis","doi":"10.5397/cise.2022.01438","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5397/cise.2022.01438","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sleep quality, quantity, and efficiency have all been demonstrated to be adversely affected by rotator cuff pathology. Previous measures of assessing the impact of rotator cuff pathology on sleep have been largely subjective in nature. This study was undertaken to objectively analyze this relationship through the use of activity monitors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears at a single institution were prospectively enrolled between 2018 and 2020. Waistworn accelerometers were provided for the patients to use each night for 14 days. Sleep efficiency was calculated using the ratio of the time spent sleeping to the total amount of time that was spent in bed. Retraction of the rotator cuff tear was classified using the Patte staging system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 36 patients: 18 with Patte stage 1 disease, 14 with Patte stage 2 disease, and 4 patients with Patte stage 3 disease. During the study, 25 participants wore the monitor on multiple nights, and ultimately their data was used for the analysis. No difference in the median sleep efficiency was appreciated amongst these groups (P&gt;0.1), with each cohort of patients demonstrating a generally high sleep efficiency.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The severity of retraction of the rotator cuff tear did not appear to correlate with changes in sleep efficiency for patients (P&gt;0.1). These findings can better inform providers on how to counsel their patients who present with complaints of poor sleep in the setting of full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Level of evidence: Level II.</p>","PeriodicalId":33981,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow","volume":"26 2","pages":"169-174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1f/5c/cise-2022-01438.PMC10277714.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9659858","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Golf participation after rotator cuff repair: functional outcomes, rate of return and factors associated with return to play. 肩袖修复后的高尔夫参与:功能结果、恢复率和与恢复比赛相关的因素。
Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.5397/cise.2022.01361
Thomas R Williamson, Patrick G Robinson, Iain R Murray, Andrew D Murray, Julie M McBirnie, C Michael Robinson, Deborah J MacDonald, Nicholas D Clement

Background: Golf is a popular sport involving overhead activity and engagement of the rotator cuff (RC). This study aimed to determine to what level golfers were able to return to golf following RC repair, the barriers to them returning to golf and factors associated with their failure to return to golf.

Methods: Patients preoperatively identifying as golfers undergoing RC repair at the study centre from 2012 to 2020 were retrospectively followed up with to assess their golf-playing status, performance and frequency of play and functional and quality of life (QoL) outcomes.

Results: Forty-seven golfers (40 men [85.1%] and 7 women [14.9%]) with a mean age of 56.8 years met the inclusion criteria, and 80.1% were followed up with at a mean of 27.1 months postoperatively. Twenty-nine patients (76.3%) had returned to golf with a mean handicap change of +1.0 (P=0.291). Golf frequency decreased from a mean of 1.8 rounds per week preinjury to 1.5 rounds per week postoperatively (P=0.052). The EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) index and visual analog scale (EQ-VAS) score were significantly greater in those returning to golf (P=0.024 and P=0.002), although functional outcome measures were not significantly different. The primary barriers to return were ipsilateral shoulder dysfunction (78%) and loss of the habit of play (22%).

Conclusions: Golfers were likely (76%) to return to golf following RC repair, including mostly to their premorbid performance level with little residual symptomatology. Return to golf was associated with a greater QoL. Persistent subjective shoulder dysfunction (78%) was the most common barrier to returning to golf. Level of evidence: Level IV.

背景:高尔夫是一项流行的运动,涉及头顶活动和肩袖(RC)的参与。本研究旨在确定高尔夫球手在RC修复后能够重返高尔夫的水平,他们重返高尔夫的障碍以及与他们重返高尔夫失败相关的因素。方法:对2012年至2020年在研究中心接受RC修复的术前高尔夫球手进行回顾性随访,评估他们的高尔夫运动状态、表现和频率以及功能和生活质量(QoL)结果。结果:47例高尔夫球手符合纳入标准,其中男性40例(85.1%),女性7例(14.9%),平均年龄56.8岁,80.1%的患者术后平均随访27.1个月。29例患者(76.3%)恢复高尔夫,平均差点变化+1.0 (P=0.291)。高尔夫球频率从伤前平均每周1.8轮下降到术后平均每周1.5轮(P=0.052)。回归高尔夫球者的EuroQol 5维5水平(EQ-5D-5L)指数和视觉模拟量表(EQ-VAS)评分显著高于对照组(P=0.024和P=0.002),但功能结局指标无显著差异。复发的主要障碍是同侧肩功能障碍(78%)和游戏习惯的丧失(22%)。结论:高尔夫球手有可能(76%)在RC修复后重返高尔夫球场,其中大部分恢复到发病前的表现水平,几乎没有残留症状。重返高尔夫球场与更高的生活质量相关。持续的主观肩部功能障碍(78%)是重返高尔夫球场最常见的障碍。证据等级:四级。
{"title":"Golf participation after rotator cuff repair: functional outcomes, rate of return and factors associated with return to play.","authors":"Thomas R Williamson,&nbsp;Patrick G Robinson,&nbsp;Iain R Murray,&nbsp;Andrew D Murray,&nbsp;Julie M McBirnie,&nbsp;C Michael Robinson,&nbsp;Deborah J MacDonald,&nbsp;Nicholas D Clement","doi":"10.5397/cise.2022.01361","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5397/cise.2022.01361","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Golf is a popular sport involving overhead activity and engagement of the rotator cuff (RC). This study aimed to determine to what level golfers were able to return to golf following RC repair, the barriers to them returning to golf and factors associated with their failure to return to golf.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients preoperatively identifying as golfers undergoing RC repair at the study centre from 2012 to 2020 were retrospectively followed up with to assess their golf-playing status, performance and frequency of play and functional and quality of life (QoL) outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-seven golfers (40 men [85.1%] and 7 women [14.9%]) with a mean age of 56.8 years met the inclusion criteria, and 80.1% were followed up with at a mean of 27.1 months postoperatively. Twenty-nine patients (76.3%) had returned to golf with a mean handicap change of +1.0 (P=0.291). Golf frequency decreased from a mean of 1.8 rounds per week preinjury to 1.5 rounds per week postoperatively (P=0.052). The EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) index and visual analog scale (EQ-VAS) score were significantly greater in those returning to golf (P=0.024 and P=0.002), although functional outcome measures were not significantly different. The primary barriers to return were ipsilateral shoulder dysfunction (78%) and loss of the habit of play (22%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Golfers were likely (76%) to return to golf following RC repair, including mostly to their premorbid performance level with little residual symptomatology. Return to golf was associated with a greater QoL. Persistent subjective shoulder dysfunction (78%) was the most common barrier to returning to golf. Level of evidence: Level IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":33981,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow","volume":"26 2","pages":"109-116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/93/c1/cise-2022-01361.PMC10277701.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9720495","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Myositis unrelated to the inoculation site after COVID-19 vaccination: a case report. COVID-19疫苗接种后与接种部位无关的肌炎1例报告。
Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.5397/cise.2022.00983
Jung Won Han, Jae Min Oh, Dae Hee Lee, Young Dae Jeon

We describe the case of a 49-year-old right hand-dominant woman with myositis of the biceps brachii muscle unrelated to the inoculation site following Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccination on the deltoid muscle of the left shoulder. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has involved global spread, and different vaccines including inactivated, protein, vectored, and nucleic acid vaccines have been developed and administered. Common side effects of COVID-19 vaccines include general manifestations such as headache, fever, and fatigue, and various musculoskeletal symptoms. Here, we present a case of myositis occurring in the biceps brachii muscle unrelated to the inoculation site, which has not been reported previously, accompanied by a literature review.

我们描述了一名49岁的右手型女性,在左肩三角肌接种了辉瑞- biontech COVID-19疫苗后,出现了与接种部位无关的肱二头肌肌炎。2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行已在全球蔓延,人们开发并接种了灭活疫苗、蛋白疫苗、载体疫苗和核酸疫苗等不同疫苗。COVID-19疫苗的常见副作用包括头痛、发烧和疲劳等一般表现,以及各种肌肉骨骼症状。在这里,我们提出一例肌炎发生在肱二头肌无关的接种部位,这是以前没有报道,并伴有文献综述。
{"title":"Myositis unrelated to the inoculation site after COVID-19 vaccination: a case report.","authors":"Jung Won Han,&nbsp;Jae Min Oh,&nbsp;Dae Hee Lee,&nbsp;Young Dae Jeon","doi":"10.5397/cise.2022.00983","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5397/cise.2022.00983","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We describe the case of a 49-year-old right hand-dominant woman with myositis of the biceps brachii muscle unrelated to the inoculation site following Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccination on the deltoid muscle of the left shoulder. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has involved global spread, and different vaccines including inactivated, protein, vectored, and nucleic acid vaccines have been developed and administered. Common side effects of COVID-19 vaccines include general manifestations such as headache, fever, and fatigue, and various musculoskeletal symptoms. Here, we present a case of myositis occurring in the biceps brachii muscle unrelated to the inoculation site, which has not been reported previously, accompanied by a literature review.</p>","PeriodicalId":33981,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow","volume":"26 2","pages":"208-211"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a5/a3/cise-2022-00983.PMC10277710.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9720493","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The elbow is the load-bearing joint during arm swing. 在手臂摆动时,肘部是承重关节。
Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.5397/cise.2023.00101
Bokku Kang, Gu-Hee Jung, Erica Kholinne, In-Ho Jeon, Jae-Man Kwak

Background: Arm swing plays a role in gait by accommodating forward movement through trunk balance. This study evaluates the biomechanical characteristics of arm swing during gait.

Methods: The study performed computational musculoskeletal modeling based on motion tracking in 15 participants without musculoskeletal or gait disorder. A three-dimensional (3D) motion tracking system using three Azure Kinect (Microsoft) modules was used to obtain information in the 3D location of shoulder and elbow joints. Computational modeling using AnyBody Modeling System was performed to calculate the joint moment and range of motion (ROM) during arm swing.

Results: The mean ROM of the dominant elbow was 29.7°±10.2° and 14.2°±3.2° in flexion-extension and pronation-supination, respectively. The mean joint moment of the dominant elbow was 56.4±12.7 Nm, 25.6±5.2 Nm, and 19.8±4.6 Nm in flexion-extension, rotation, and abduction-adduction, respectively.

Conclusions: The elbow bears the load created by gravity and muscle contracture in dynamic arm swing movement.

背景:手臂摆动通过躯干平衡调节向前运动,在步态中起作用。本研究评估了步态中手臂摆动的生物力学特征。方法:该研究对15名没有肌肉骨骼或步态障碍的参与者进行了基于运动跟踪的计算肌肉骨骼建模。采用三个Azure Kinect (Microsoft)模块的三维(3D)运动跟踪系统来获取肩关节和肘关节的三维位置信息。利用任何建模系统进行计算建模,计算手臂摆动时的关节力矩和运动范围。结果:主肘屈伸和旋前活动的平均关节活动度分别为29.7°±10.2°和14.2°±3.2°。优势肘关节屈伸、旋转和外展内收的平均关节力矩分别为56.4±12.7 Nm、25.6±5.2 Nm和19.8±4.6 Nm。结论:在动态臂摆运动中,肘部承受重力和肌肉挛缩造成的负荷。
{"title":"The elbow is the load-bearing joint during arm swing.","authors":"Bokku Kang,&nbsp;Gu-Hee Jung,&nbsp;Erica Kholinne,&nbsp;In-Ho Jeon,&nbsp;Jae-Man Kwak","doi":"10.5397/cise.2023.00101","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5397/cise.2023.00101","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Arm swing plays a role in gait by accommodating forward movement through trunk balance. This study evaluates the biomechanical characteristics of arm swing during gait.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study performed computational musculoskeletal modeling based on motion tracking in 15 participants without musculoskeletal or gait disorder. A three-dimensional (3D) motion tracking system using three Azure Kinect (Microsoft) modules was used to obtain information in the 3D location of shoulder and elbow joints. Computational modeling using AnyBody Modeling System was performed to calculate the joint moment and range of motion (ROM) during arm swing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean ROM of the dominant elbow was 29.7°±10.2° and 14.2°±3.2° in flexion-extension and pronation-supination, respectively. The mean joint moment of the dominant elbow was 56.4±12.7 Nm, 25.6±5.2 Nm, and 19.8±4.6 Nm in flexion-extension, rotation, and abduction-adduction, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The elbow bears the load created by gravity and muscle contracture in dynamic arm swing movement.</p>","PeriodicalId":33981,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow","volume":"26 2","pages":"126-130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/87/b3/cise-2023-00101.PMC10277704.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9666263","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Core decompression for early-stage avascular necrosis of the humeral head: current concepts and techniques. 肱骨头早期缺血性坏死的核心减压术:当前的概念和技术。
Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.5397/cise.2022.00969
Michael D Scheidt, Saleh Aiyash, Dane Salazar, Nickolas Garbis

Avascular necrosis (AVN) of the humeral head is a rare, yet detrimental complication. Left untreated, humeral head AVN frequently progresses to subchondral fracturing and articular collapse. Cases of late-stage humeral head AVN commonly require invasive procedures including humeral head resurfacing, hemiarthroplasty, and total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) to improve clinical outcomes. However, in cases of early-stage AVN, core decompression of the humeral head is a viable and efficacious short-term treatment option for patients with pre-collapse AVN of the humeral head to improve clinical outcomes and prevent disease progression. Several techniques have been described, however, a percutaneous, arthroscopic-assisted technique may allow for accurate staging and concomitant treatment of intraarticular pathology during surgery, although further long-term clinical studies are necessary to assess its overall outcomes compared with standard techniques. Biologic adjunctive treatments, including synthetic bone grafting, autologous mesenchymal stem cell/bone marrow grafts, and bone allografts are viable options for reducing the progression of AVN to further collapse in the short term, although long-term follow-up with sufficient study power is lacking in current clinical studies. Further long-term outcome studies are required to determine the longevity of core decompression as a conservative measure for early-stage AVN of the humeral head.

肱骨头缺血性坏死(AVN)是一种罕见但有害的并发症。如果不及时治疗,肱骨头AVN经常发展为软骨下骨折和关节塌陷。晚期肱骨头AVN通常需要侵入性手术,包括肱骨头置换术、半关节置换术和全肩关节置换术(TSA)来改善临床结果。然而,对于早期AVN,肱骨头前塌陷AVN患者,肱骨头核心减压是一种可行且有效的短期治疗选择,可改善临床结果并预防疾病进展。然而,经皮关节镜辅助技术可能允许手术期间准确分期和伴随治疗关节内病理,尽管需要进一步的长期临床研究来评估其与标准技术相比的总体结果。生物辅助治疗,包括人工骨移植、自体间充质干细胞/骨髓移植和同种异体骨移植,是短期内减少AVN进一步塌陷进展的可行选择,尽管目前的临床研究缺乏足够的长期随访研究。需要进一步的长期结果研究来确定核心减压作为早期肱骨头AVN的保守措施的寿命。
{"title":"Core decompression for early-stage avascular necrosis of the humeral head: current concepts and techniques.","authors":"Michael D Scheidt,&nbsp;Saleh Aiyash,&nbsp;Dane Salazar,&nbsp;Nickolas Garbis","doi":"10.5397/cise.2022.00969","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5397/cise.2022.00969","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Avascular necrosis (AVN) of the humeral head is a rare, yet detrimental complication. Left untreated, humeral head AVN frequently progresses to subchondral fracturing and articular collapse. Cases of late-stage humeral head AVN commonly require invasive procedures including humeral head resurfacing, hemiarthroplasty, and total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) to improve clinical outcomes. However, in cases of early-stage AVN, core decompression of the humeral head is a viable and efficacious short-term treatment option for patients with pre-collapse AVN of the humeral head to improve clinical outcomes and prevent disease progression. Several techniques have been described, however, a percutaneous, arthroscopic-assisted technique may allow for accurate staging and concomitant treatment of intraarticular pathology during surgery, although further long-term clinical studies are necessary to assess its overall outcomes compared with standard techniques. Biologic adjunctive treatments, including synthetic bone grafting, autologous mesenchymal stem cell/bone marrow grafts, and bone allografts are viable options for reducing the progression of AVN to further collapse in the short term, although long-term follow-up with sufficient study power is lacking in current clinical studies. Further long-term outcome studies are required to determine the longevity of core decompression as a conservative measure for early-stage AVN of the humeral head.</p>","PeriodicalId":33981,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow","volume":"26 2","pages":"191-204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4b/9e/cise-2022-00969.PMC10277707.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9664541","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Addenda: Adding ORCID, Author contributions, Conflict of interest, Funding, Data availability, and Acknowledgments at the end of the main text. 附录:在正文末尾添加ORCID、作者贡献、利益冲突、资金、数据可用性和致谢。
Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.5397/cise.2023.00248
{"title":"Addenda: Adding ORCID, Author contributions, Conflict of interest, Funding, Data availability, and Acknowledgments at the end of the main text.","authors":"","doi":"10.5397/cise.2023.00248","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5397/cise.2023.00248","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":33981,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow","volume":"26 2","pages":"217-218"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5f/94/cise-2023-00248.PMC10277709.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10022766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests to rule out elbow fracture: a systematic review. 排除肘部骨折的临床试验诊断准确性:一项系统综述。
Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.5397/cise.2022.00948
Giorgio Breda, Gianluca De Marco, Pierfranco Cesaraccio, Paolo Pillastrini

Elbow traumas represent a relatively common condition in clinical practice. However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the most accurate tests for screening these potentially serious conditions and excluding elbow fractures. The purpose of this investigation was to analyze the literature concerning the diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for the detection or exclusion of suspected elbow fractures. A systematic review was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (PRISMA-DTA) guidelines. Literature databases including PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Diagnostic Test Accuracy, Cochrane Library, the Web of Science, and ScienceDirect were searched for diagnostic accuracy studies of subjects with suspected traumatic elbow fracture investigating clinical tests compared to imaging reference tests. The risk of bias in each study was assessed independently by two reviewers using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 checklist. Twelve studies (4,485 patients) were included. Three different types of index tests were extracted. In adults, these tests were very sensitive, with values up to 98.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 95.0%-99.8%). The specificity was very variable, ranging from 24.0% (95% CI, 19.0%-30.0%) to 69.4% (95% CI, 57.3%-79.5%). The applicability of these tests was very high, while overall studies showed a medium risk of bias. Elbow full range of motion test, elbow extension test, and elbow extension and point tenderness test appear to be useful in the presence of a negative test to exclude fracture in a majority of cases. The specificity of all tests, however, does not allow us to draw useful conclusions because there was a great variability of results obtained.

在临床实践中,肘部创伤是一种比较常见的疾病。然而,关于筛查这些潜在严重疾病和排除肘部骨折的最准确测试,缺乏证据。本研究的目的是分析有关临床检查诊断或排除疑似肘部骨折的准确性的文献。采用诊断测试准确性研究系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA-DTA)指南的首选报告项目进行系统评价。文献数据库包括PubMed、护理和相关健康文献累积索引、诊断测试准确性、Cochrane图书馆、科学网和ScienceDirect,检索疑似外伤性肘部骨折受试者的诊断准确性研究,调查临床测试与影像学参考测试的比较。每项研究的偏倚风险由两名审稿人使用诊断准确性研究质量评估2检查表独立评估。纳入了12项研究(4485例患者)。提取了三种不同类型的指标检验。在成人中,这些测试非常敏感,其值高达98.6%(95%置信区间[CI], 95.0%-99.8%)。特异性变化很大,范围从24.0% (95% CI, 19.0%-30.0%)到69.4% (95% CI, 57.3%-79.5%)。这些测试的适用性非常高,而总体研究显示偏倚风险中等。在大多数情况下,肘关节全活动范围测试、肘关节伸展测试、肘关节伸展和关节点压痛测试在阴性测试的情况下是有用的,可以排除骨折。然而,所有测试的特异性不允许我们得出有用的结论,因为获得的结果有很大的可变性。
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests to rule out elbow fracture: a systematic review.","authors":"Giorgio Breda,&nbsp;Gianluca De Marco,&nbsp;Pierfranco Cesaraccio,&nbsp;Paolo Pillastrini","doi":"10.5397/cise.2022.00948","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5397/cise.2022.00948","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Elbow traumas represent a relatively common condition in clinical practice. However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the most accurate tests for screening these potentially serious conditions and excluding elbow fractures. The purpose of this investigation was to analyze the literature concerning the diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for the detection or exclusion of suspected elbow fractures. A systematic review was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (PRISMA-DTA) guidelines. Literature databases including PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Diagnostic Test Accuracy, Cochrane Library, the Web of Science, and ScienceDirect were searched for diagnostic accuracy studies of subjects with suspected traumatic elbow fracture investigating clinical tests compared to imaging reference tests. The risk of bias in each study was assessed independently by two reviewers using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 checklist. Twelve studies (4,485 patients) were included. Three different types of index tests were extracted. In adults, these tests were very sensitive, with values up to 98.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 95.0%-99.8%). The specificity was very variable, ranging from 24.0% (95% CI, 19.0%-30.0%) to 69.4% (95% CI, 57.3%-79.5%). The applicability of these tests was very high, while overall studies showed a medium risk of bias. Elbow full range of motion test, elbow extension test, and elbow extension and point tenderness test appear to be useful in the presence of a negative test to exclude fracture in a majority of cases. The specificity of all tests, however, does not allow us to draw useful conclusions because there was a great variability of results obtained.</p>","PeriodicalId":33981,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow","volume":"26 2","pages":"182-190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c0/ab/cise-2022-00948.PMC10277706.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9664505","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
期刊
Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1