首页 > 最新文献

Clinical Psychology in Europe最新文献

英文 中文
International Prolonged Grief Disorder Scale Addendum for Refugees and Displaced People (IPGDS-ARD): A Study of Arabic-Speaking Bereaved Refugees. 国际难民和流离失所者长期悲伤障碍量表(IPGDS-ARD):对阿拉伯语丧亲难民的研究。
Q2 Psychology Pub Date : 2025-02-28 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI: 10.32872/cpe.11435
Clare Killikelly, Alexandra Reymond, Anaïs Aeschlimann, Andreas Maercker, Eva Heim

Background: Prolonged grief disorder (PGD) is a new and significant addition to the ICD-11 WHO disease classification system and the DSM 5-TR. As a new disorder, it stands to improve diagnostic precision, enhance communication among health professionals and patients, provide better access to care and lead to effective treatments and intervention. However, it remains to be determined if the new diagnostic criteria for PGD are applicable to different cultural groups.

Method: Here we sought to adapt the International Prolonged Grief Disorder Scale for refugees and displaced people. We conducted two focus groups with clinicians and health care workers and six cognitive interviews with bereaved Arabic-speaking refugees.

Results: This formative research resulted in an addendum (comprised of three new scales) to the IPGDS aimed to aid with treatment planning: the 42 item Addendum for Refugees and Displaced people (IPGDS-ARD). Here we present the steps for scale augmentation based on cultural considerations, a detailed description of clinical utility, feasibility and content validity established at each step, and an analysis of the percent of change in content at each step.

Conclusion: We conclude that the presented method of scale augmentation is a feasible and efficient approach that led to a culturally relevant, clinically useful addendum to an existing PGD questionnaire.

背景:延长悲伤障碍(PGD)是ICD-11世卫组织疾病分类系统和DSM 5-TR的一个新的重要补充。作为一种新的疾病,它将提高诊断的准确性,加强卫生专业人员和患者之间的沟通,提供更好的护理机会,并导致有效的治疗和干预。然而,新的PGD诊断标准是否适用于不同的文化群体仍有待确定。方法:本研究采用国际长期悲伤障碍量表,适用于难民和流离失所者。我们对临床医生和卫生保健工作者进行了两次焦点小组讨论,并对失去亲人的阿拉伯语难民进行了六次认知访谈。结果:这项形成性研究产生了IPGDS的附录(由三个新量表组成),旨在帮助制定治疗计划:难民和流离失所者的42项附录(IPGDS- ard)。在这里,我们提出了基于文化考虑的规模扩大的步骤,详细描述了临床效用,可行性和每一步建立的内容有效性,并分析了每一步内容变化的百分比。结论:我们得出结论,所提出的量表增加方法是一种可行和有效的方法,可以对现有的PGD问卷进行文化相关和临床有用的补充。
{"title":"International Prolonged Grief Disorder Scale Addendum for Refugees and Displaced People (IPGDS-ARD): A Study of Arabic-Speaking Bereaved Refugees.","authors":"Clare Killikelly, Alexandra Reymond, Anaïs Aeschlimann, Andreas Maercker, Eva Heim","doi":"10.32872/cpe.11435","DOIUrl":"10.32872/cpe.11435","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prolonged grief disorder (PGD) is a new and significant addition to the ICD-11 WHO disease classification system and the DSM 5-TR. As a new disorder, it stands to improve diagnostic precision, enhance communication among health professionals and patients, provide better access to care and lead to effective treatments and intervention. However, it remains to be determined if the new diagnostic criteria for PGD are applicable to different cultural groups.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Here we sought to adapt the International Prolonged Grief Disorder Scale for refugees and displaced people. We conducted two focus groups with clinicians and health care workers and six cognitive interviews with bereaved Arabic-speaking refugees.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This formative research resulted in an addendum (comprised of three new scales) to the IPGDS aimed to aid with treatment planning: the 42 item Addendum for Refugees and Displaced people (IPGDS-ARD). Here we present the steps for scale augmentation based on cultural considerations, a detailed description of clinical utility, feasibility and content validity established at each step, and an analysis of the percent of change in content at each step.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We conclude that the presented method of scale augmentation is a feasible and efficient approach that led to a culturally relevant, clinically useful addendum to an existing PGD questionnaire.</p>","PeriodicalId":34029,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology in Europe","volume":"7 1","pages":"e11435"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11960568/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143774240","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
ICD-11 Prolonged Grief Disorder, Physical Health, and Somatic Problems: A Systematic Review. ICD-11延长悲伤障碍,身体健康和躯体问题:系统回顾。
Q2 Psychology Pub Date : 2025-02-28 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI: 10.32872/cpe.14351
James Cunningham, Mark Shevlin, Catalina Cerda, Eoin McElroy

Background: Since Prolonged Grief Disorder's (PGD) inclusion as a mental health disorder in the ICD-11 in 2018, much of the peer-reviewed research has focused on its prevalence, assessment, and co-occurrence with other mental health disorders. There is also emerging research literature on the association between PGD and physical and somatic health outcomes. In light of this, the objective of this review was to identify and summarise the extant research on the association between PGD, and outcomes related to physical health and somatic complaints among bereaved individuals.

Method: A systematic review utilized electronic databases (Web of Science, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO) up to October 10, 2023. Included were cohort and cross-sectional studies since 2018 exploring links between ICD-11 PGD and physical/somatic health outcomes. Two researchers independently identified eligible studies meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria, employing quality assessment instruments to evaluate methodological rigor.

Results: From the 418 articles that were initially screened, 18 met the inclusion criteria. The studies reported significant associations between PGD and physical health, somatic symptom distress, insomnia severity, blood pressure, bodily distress syndrome, chronic physical diseases, and poor- caregiver health profiles.

Conclusion: Out of the 18 studies eligible for analysis, 13 (72%) established a significantly strong or moderate association between PGD and physical or somatic illness, highlighting the intricate nature of this connection. Further research is required to assess the breadth of physical and somatic health problems associated with PGD and to understand the psychological and biological mechanisms that underpin these observed relationships.

背景:自2018年将延长悲伤障碍(PGD)作为一种精神健康障碍纳入ICD-11以来,许多同行评议的研究都集中在其患病率、评估以及与其他精神健康障碍的共发性上。还有关于PGD与身体和躯体健康结果之间关系的新兴研究文献。鉴于此,本综述的目的是确定和总结现有的关于PGD与丧亲者身体健康和躯体疾病相关结果之间关系的研究。方法:利用截至2023年10月10日的电子数据库(Web of Science, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO)进行系统评价。纳入了自2018年以来的队列和横断面研究,探讨了ICD-11 PGD与身体/躯体健康结果之间的联系。两名研究人员独立确定了符合纳入/排除标准的合格研究,采用质量评估工具评估方法的严密性。结果:在最初筛选的418篇文章中,有18篇符合纳入标准。这些研究报告了PGD与身体健康、躯体症状困扰、失眠严重程度、血压、身体困扰综合征、慢性身体疾病和照顾者健康状况差之间的显著关联。结论:在符合分析条件的18项研究中,13项(72%)在PGD与身体或躯体疾病之间建立了显著的强烈或中度关联,突出了这种联系的复杂性。需要进一步的研究来评估与PGD相关的身体和躯体健康问题的广度,并了解支撑这些观察到的关系的心理和生物学机制。
{"title":"ICD-11 Prolonged Grief Disorder, Physical Health, and Somatic Problems: A Systematic Review.","authors":"James Cunningham, Mark Shevlin, Catalina Cerda, Eoin McElroy","doi":"10.32872/cpe.14351","DOIUrl":"10.32872/cpe.14351","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since Prolonged Grief Disorder's (PGD) inclusion as a mental health disorder in the ICD-11 in 2018, much of the peer-reviewed research has focused on its prevalence, assessment, and co-occurrence with other mental health disorders. There is also emerging research literature on the association between PGD and physical and somatic health outcomes. In light of this, the objective of this review was to identify and summarise the extant research on the association between PGD, and outcomes related to physical health and somatic complaints among bereaved individuals.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic review utilized electronic databases (Web of Science, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO) up to October 10, 2023. Included were cohort and cross-sectional studies since 2018 exploring links between ICD-11 PGD and physical/somatic health outcomes. Two researchers independently identified eligible studies meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria, employing quality assessment instruments to evaluate methodological rigor.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the 418 articles that were initially screened, 18 met the inclusion criteria. The studies reported significant associations between PGD and physical health, somatic symptom distress, insomnia severity, blood pressure, bodily distress syndrome, chronic physical diseases, and poor- caregiver health profiles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Out of the 18 studies eligible for analysis, 13 (72%) established a significantly strong or moderate association between PGD and physical or somatic illness, highlighting the intricate nature of this connection. Further research is required to assess the breadth of physical and somatic health problems associated with PGD and to understand the psychological and biological mechanisms that underpin these observed relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":34029,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology in Europe","volume":"7 1","pages":"e14351"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11960567/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143774237","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Can a 1-Item Scale for Psychotherapy Outcomes Be Psychometrically Robust? 一项心理治疗结果量表在心理测量学上是否可靠?
Q2 Psychology Pub Date : 2025-02-28 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI: 10.32872/cpe.15207
Scott T Meier
{"title":"Can a 1-Item Scale for Psychotherapy Outcomes Be Psychometrically Robust?","authors":"Scott T Meier","doi":"10.32872/cpe.15207","DOIUrl":"10.32872/cpe.15207","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":34029,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology in Europe","volume":"7 1","pages":"e15207"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11960556/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143774216","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Allegiance and Treatment Quality as Moderators of the Comparative Effectiveness of Psychotherapy? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Comparing Humanistic Psychotherapy to Other Psychotherapy Approaches. 忠诚和治疗质量是心理治疗比较有效性的调节因子?比较人文主义心理治疗与其他心理治疗方法研究的系统回顾与元分析。
Q2 Psychology Pub Date : 2025-02-28 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI: 10.32872/cpe.9709
Olivia Schünemann, Alessa Jansen, Ulrike Willutzki, Nina Heinrichs

Background: Achieving positive outcomes in comparative RCTs examining psychotherapy interventions may be moderated by other factors than treatments alone, namely allegiance and treatment quality (bona fide, adherence). Using the study sample of a recent comprehensive review on humanistic interventions by the German Scientific Board of Psychotherapy, we assumed that higher allegiance towards non-humanistic approaches and lower treatment quality in the humanistic intervention arm would result in worse outcomes for the humanistic groups.

Method: We included studies in which a humanistic psychotherapy (sub-)approach was compared to another type of psychotherapy. Data was extracted independently by the authors. A priori defined meta-regression analyses were performed with allegiance and treatment quality as main moderators and study quality (risk of bias), type of active control, humanistic psychotherapy and target population (children/adolescents; adults) as exploratory.

Results: The majority of studies showed non-allegiance towards humanistic intervention arms; only about half of the humanistic interventions were bona fide treatments demonstrating high percentages of potential biases in these comparative intervention studies. However, allegiance and bona fide were significant moderators only for two (allegiance) resp. one (bona fide) of five outcome comparison. Type of active control (cognitive behavioural therapy) and disorder group (anxiety disorders) emerged as further moderators.

Conclusion: We found no clear evidence for allegiance or treatment quality impacting upon treatment outcome in this re-examination. Allegiance and treatment quality were not as relevant for outcomes in this meta-analysis of RCTs as expected.

背景:在检验心理治疗干预的比较随机对照试验中,获得积极结果可能会受到其他因素的影响,而不是单独的治疗,即忠诚和治疗质量(诚意,依从性)。使用德国心理治疗科学委员会最近对人文干预的全面回顾的研究样本,我们假设人文干预组对非人文方法的更高忠诚和人文干预组较低的治疗质量会导致人文组的结果更差。方法:我们纳入了将人本主义心理治疗(亚)方法与另一种心理治疗方法进行比较的研究。数据由作者独立提取。以忠诚和治疗质量为主要调节因素、研究质量(偏倚风险)、主动控制类型、人本主义心理治疗和目标人群(儿童/青少年;成年人)是探索性的。结果:大多数研究显示对人文干预武器不效忠;只有大约一半的人文干预是真正的治疗,在这些比较干预研究中显示出很高的潜在偏差百分比。然而,忠诚和善意仅在两个(忠诚)方面起显著调节作用。一个(真正的)五个结果比较。主动控制类型(认知行为治疗)和障碍组(焦虑障碍)成为进一步的调节因素。结论:在这次复查中,我们没有发现忠诚或治疗质量影响治疗结果的明确证据。在这项随机对照试验的荟萃分析中,忠诚和治疗质量与结果的相关性并不像预期的那样大。
{"title":"Allegiance and Treatment Quality as Moderators of the Comparative Effectiveness of Psychotherapy? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Comparing Humanistic Psychotherapy to Other Psychotherapy Approaches.","authors":"Olivia Schünemann, Alessa Jansen, Ulrike Willutzki, Nina Heinrichs","doi":"10.32872/cpe.9709","DOIUrl":"10.32872/cpe.9709","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Achieving positive outcomes in comparative RCTs examining psychotherapy interventions may be moderated by other factors than treatments alone, namely allegiance and treatment quality (bona fide, adherence). Using the study sample of a recent comprehensive review on humanistic interventions by the German Scientific Board of Psychotherapy, we assumed that higher allegiance towards non-humanistic approaches and lower treatment quality in the humanistic intervention arm would result in worse outcomes for the humanistic groups.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We included studies in which a humanistic psychotherapy (sub-)approach was compared to another type of psychotherapy. Data was extracted independently by the authors. A priori defined meta-regression analyses were performed with allegiance and treatment quality as main moderators and study quality (risk of bias), type of active control, humanistic psychotherapy and target population (children/adolescents; adults) as exploratory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of studies showed non-allegiance towards humanistic intervention arms; only about half of the humanistic interventions were bona fide treatments demonstrating high percentages of potential biases in these comparative intervention studies. However, allegiance and bona fide were significant moderators only for two (allegiance) resp. one (bona fide) of five outcome comparison. Type of active control (cognitive behavioural therapy) and disorder group (anxiety disorders) emerged as further moderators.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found no clear evidence for allegiance or treatment quality impacting upon treatment outcome in this re-examination. Allegiance and treatment quality were not as relevant for outcomes in this meta-analysis of RCTs as expected.</p>","PeriodicalId":34029,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology in Europe","volume":"7 1","pages":"e9709"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11960564/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143774212","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The History of Clinical Psychology in Greece: A Brief Review - Legal Deficiencies, Practical Dimensions and Challenges for the Future. 希腊临床心理学的历史:简要回顾-法律缺陷,实践维度和未来的挑战。
Q2 Psychology Pub Date : 2024-12-20 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.32872/cpe.12515
Katerina Flora

Background: The history of clinical psychology in Greece spans more than 150 years. However, this branch of psychology concerned with the assessment and treatment of mental illness and psychological problems has not yet acquired the institutional and general recognition to which it is entitled.

Aims: This article intends to highlight, chronologically, the basic elements of the history of clinical psychology in Greece, beginning with the important contribution of the work of philologist Panagiota Kazolea-Tavoularis.

Results: From the first references in the context of medical studies during the 19th century, clinical psychology gradually develops through its application in pedagogical, laboratory, and clinical contexts to become an independent discipline alongside the consolidation of general psychology. Special mention is made of the scientists who pioneered this direction.

Conclusion: The present review highlights historical milestones and concludes with the current situation, in which important steps have been taken. However, significant changes are needed at the institutional level.

背景:希腊临床心理学的历史长达150多年。然而,这一涉及精神疾病和心理问题的评估和治疗的心理学分支尚未获得应有的机构和普遍认可。目的:本文旨在从语言学家Panagiota Kazolea-Tavoularis的重要贡献开始,按时间顺序重点介绍希腊临床心理学史的基本要素。结果:从19世纪医学研究的第一个参考文献开始,临床心理学通过其在教学、实验室和临床环境中的应用逐渐发展成为一门独立的学科,与普通心理学一起得到巩固。特别要提到的是开创这一方向的科学家们。结论:本综述突出了历史里程碑,总结了已采取重要步骤的现状。但是,需要在体制一级进行重大改革。
{"title":"The History of Clinical Psychology in Greece: A Brief Review - Legal Deficiencies, Practical Dimensions and Challenges for the Future.","authors":"Katerina Flora","doi":"10.32872/cpe.12515","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.12515","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The history of clinical psychology in Greece spans more than 150 years. However, this branch of psychology concerned with the assessment and treatment of mental illness and psychological problems has not yet acquired the institutional and general recognition to which it is entitled.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This article intends to highlight, chronologically, the basic elements of the history of clinical psychology in Greece, beginning with the important contribution of the work of philologist Panagiota Kazolea-Tavoularis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the first references in the context of medical studies during the 19th century, clinical psychology gradually develops through its application in pedagogical, laboratory, and clinical contexts to become an independent discipline alongside the consolidation of general psychology. Special mention is made of the scientists who pioneered this direction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present review highlights historical milestones and concludes with the current situation, in which important steps have been taken. However, significant changes are needed at the institutional level.</p>","PeriodicalId":34029,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology in Europe","volume":"6 4","pages":"e12515"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11960555/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143774203","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessing Diagnostic Precision: Adaptations of the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL-5/10/25) Among Tertiary-Level Students in Norway. 评估诊断精度:霍普金斯症状检查表(hsl -5/10/25)在挪威高等教育学生中的适应性
Q2 Psychology Pub Date : 2024-12-20 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.32872/cpe.13275
Børge Sivertsen, Jens C Skogen, Anne Reneflot, Marit Knapstad, Otto Robert Frans Smith, Leif Edvard Aarø, Benedicte Kirkøen, Bengt Oscar Lagerstrøm, Ann Kristin Skrindo Knudsen

Background: Universities worldwide are witnessing a surge in mental health problems among students, particularly in anxiety and depression. The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL) is a popular screening tool, but its reliability in identifying mental disorders remains debated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the criterion validity of the HSCL-25, HSCL-10, and HSCL-5 using 30-day prevalence of major depressive episode (MDE) and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) from a self-administered electronic version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview, fifth version (CIDI 5.0), as the benchmark.

Method: Data stem from a national survey targeting students in higher education in Norway. In a 2023 follow-up study on mental disorders, 5,568 participants completed both the HSCL-25 and the CIDI. Sex-specific optimal thresholds for all HSCL versions in relation to MDE and GAD (from CIDI) were determined using the Youden Index maximization.

Results: The optimal cut-off values for detecting MDE or GAD with the HSCL-25 were 1.96 for males and 2.20 for females, displaying a good balance between sensitivity and specificity. Similar high and balanced sensitivity and specificity patterns were found for both the HSCL-10 and HSCL-5. However, all HSCL versions overestimated prevalence rates compared to the self-administered CIDI.

Conclusions: All three HSCL versions showed high criterion validity. The data indicate that HSCL may be better as a screening tool than for precise estimation of MDE and GAD prevalence. For improved diagnostic accuracy, future HSCL versions should incorporate functional impairment assessment. This update would bring the HSCL into closer alignment with clinical diagnostic standards.

背景:世界各地的大学都见证了学生心理健康问题的激增,尤其是焦虑和抑郁。霍普金斯症状检查表(HSCL)是一种流行的筛查工具,但其在识别精神障碍方面的可靠性仍存在争议。本研究的目的是评估hhsl -25、hhsl -10和hhsl -5的标准效度,以自我给药的国际综合诊断访谈第五版(CIDI 5.0)的30天重度抑郁发作(MDE)和广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)的患病率为基准。方法:数据来源于一项针对挪威高等教育学生的全国性调查。在一项关于精神障碍的2023年随访研究中,5568名参与者完成了hsl -25和CIDI。所有HSCL版本与MDE和GAD(来自CIDI)相关的性别特异性最佳阈值使用约登指数最大化确定。结果:HSCL-25检测MDE或GAD的最佳临界值男性为1.96,女性为2.20,在敏感性和特异性之间取得了很好的平衡。在HSCL-10和HSCL-5中发现了相似的高且平衡的敏感性和特异性模式。然而,与自我管理的CIDI相比,所有HSCL版本都高估了患病率。结论:三种HSCL版本均具有较高的标准效度。数据表明,HSCL作为一种筛选工具可能比精确估计MDE和GAD患病率更好。为了提高诊断的准确性,未来的HSCL版本应该纳入功能损伤评估。这一更新将使HSCL更接近临床诊断标准。
{"title":"Assessing Diagnostic Precision: Adaptations of the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL-5/10/25) Among Tertiary-Level Students in Norway.","authors":"Børge Sivertsen, Jens C Skogen, Anne Reneflot, Marit Knapstad, Otto Robert Frans Smith, Leif Edvard Aarø, Benedicte Kirkøen, Bengt Oscar Lagerstrøm, Ann Kristin Skrindo Knudsen","doi":"10.32872/cpe.13275","DOIUrl":"10.32872/cpe.13275","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Universities worldwide are witnessing a surge in mental health problems among students, particularly in anxiety and depression. The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL) is a popular screening tool, but its reliability in identifying mental disorders remains debated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the criterion validity of the HSCL-25, HSCL-10, and HSCL-5 using 30-day prevalence of major depressive episode (MDE) and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) from a self-administered electronic version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview, fifth version (CIDI 5.0), as the benchmark.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data stem from a national survey targeting students in higher education in Norway. In a 2023 follow-up study on mental disorders, 5,568 participants completed both the HSCL-25 and the CIDI. Sex-specific optimal thresholds for all HSCL versions in relation to MDE and GAD (from CIDI) were determined using the Youden Index maximization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The optimal cut-off values for detecting MDE or GAD with the HSCL-25 were 1.96 for males and 2.20 for females, displaying a good balance between sensitivity and specificity. Similar high and balanced sensitivity and specificity patterns were found for both the HSCL-10 and HSCL-5. However, all HSCL versions overestimated prevalence rates compared to the self-administered CIDI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All three HSCL versions showed high criterion validity. The data indicate that HSCL may be better as a screening tool than for precise estimation of MDE and GAD prevalence. For improved diagnostic accuracy, future HSCL versions should incorporate functional impairment assessment. This update would bring the HSCL into closer alignment with clinical diagnostic standards.</p>","PeriodicalId":34029,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology in Europe","volume":"6 4","pages":"e13275"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11960570/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143773622","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
All I Want for Christmas Is a Loo: Visualizations of Sex and Gender on Toilet Doors. 圣诞节我想要的只是一个厕所:厕所门上的性和性别可视化。
Q2 Psychology Pub Date : 2024-12-20 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.32872/cpe.16159
Judith Rosmalen, Ilona Plug, Aranka Ballering
{"title":"All I Want for Christmas Is a Loo: Visualizations of Sex and Gender on Toilet Doors.","authors":"Judith Rosmalen, Ilona Plug, Aranka Ballering","doi":"10.32872/cpe.16159","DOIUrl":"10.32872/cpe.16159","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":34029,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology in Europe","volume":"6 4","pages":"e16159"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11960561/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143773647","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Examination of Gender Differences: Causal Attributions of Treatment-Seeking Individuals With Overweight and Obesity. 性别差异的检验:超重和肥胖寻求治疗个体的因果归因。
Q2 Psychology Pub Date : 2024-12-20 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.32872/cpe.12089
Carmen Henning, Caroline Seiferth, Tanja Färber, Magdalena Pape, Stephan Herpertz, Sabine Steins-Loeber, Jörg Wolstein

Background: Addressing patients' perceptions of the causes of their overweight and obesity may be a promising approach to enhance treatment motivation and success. Previous research suggests that there are gender differences in these aspects. The objective of this study was to investigate gender differences in causal attributions among individuals with overweight and obesity who participated in a cognitive-behavioral mobile health (mHealth) intervention.

Method: Causal attributions were assessed using the revised Illness Perceptions Questionnaire, which included a rated and open answering section. An ANCOVA was conducted for each causal factor (behavioral, psychological, risk, external) as a dependent variable to determine gender differences, which were analysed with chi-squared tests for open-ended responses.

Results: The most frequently mentioned and highly rated cause was behavior for both genders (59.8% of 639 responses). The results indicated that women rated psychological causes, particularly stress-related causes, significantly higher, F(1,211) = 14.88, p < .001, η2 = .07, and were more likely to cite emotional eating than men, χ2(1, N = 639) = 15.06, p < .001. Men rated alcohol stronger as cause than women, t(125.05) = 3.79, p < .001.

Conclusion: The findings of this study contribute to the understanding of the gender differences in causal attributions among individuals with overweight or obesity. Implementing stress management interventions with a focus on emotion regulation is pivotal, especially for females. Interventions should focus on sensitizing males to the association between emotions and eating behavior. The causal attributions should be assessed with different survey methods in order to match the patient's view of their condition.

背景:解决患者对超重和肥胖原因的看法可能是提高治疗积极性和成功率的一种有前途的方法。以往的研究表明,在这些方面存在性别差异。本研究旨在调查参与认知行为移动医疗(mHealth)干预的超重和肥胖患者在因果归因方面的性别差异:方法:使用修订后的疾病认知问卷对因果关系进行评估,该问卷包括评分和开放式回答两个部分。将每个因果因素(行为、心理、风险、外部)作为因变量进行方差分析,以确定性别差异,并对开放式回答进行卡方检验:男女两性最常提及且评价最高的原因都是行为(占 639 个回答的 59.8%)。结果显示,女性对心理原因,尤其是压力相关原因的评价明显高于男性,F(1,211) = 14.88,p < .001,η2 = .07,而且女性比男性更容易提到情绪化饮食,χ2(1, N = 639) = 15.06,p < .001。与女性相比,男性更倾向于认为酒精是导致情绪化饮食的原因,t(125.05)= 3.79,p < .001:本研究的结果有助于了解超重或肥胖症患者在因果关系归因方面的性别差异。实施以情绪调节为重点的压力管理干预至关重要,尤其是对女性而言。干预措施应侧重于让男性认识到情绪与饮食行为之间的关联。应采用不同的调查方法对因果关系进行评估,以符合患者对自身状况的看法。
{"title":"Examination of Gender Differences: Causal Attributions of Treatment-Seeking Individuals With Overweight and Obesity.","authors":"Carmen Henning, Caroline Seiferth, Tanja Färber, Magdalena Pape, Stephan Herpertz, Sabine Steins-Loeber, Jörg Wolstein","doi":"10.32872/cpe.12089","DOIUrl":"10.32872/cpe.12089","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Addressing patients' perceptions of the causes of their overweight and obesity may be a promising approach to enhance treatment motivation and success. Previous research suggests that there are gender differences in these aspects. The objective of this study was to investigate gender differences in causal attributions among individuals with overweight and obesity who participated in a cognitive-behavioral mobile health (mHealth) intervention.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Causal attributions were assessed using the revised Illness Perceptions Questionnaire, which included a rated and open answering section. An ANCOVA was conducted for each causal factor (behavioral, psychological, risk, external) as a dependent variable to determine gender differences, which were analysed with chi-squared tests for open-ended responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most frequently mentioned and highly rated cause was behavior for both genders (59.8% of 639 responses). The results indicated that women rated psychological causes, particularly stress-related causes, significantly higher, <i>F</i>(1,211) = 14.88, <i>p</i> < .001, η<sup>2</sup> = .07, and were more likely to cite emotional eating than men, χ<sup>2</sup>(1, <i>N</i> = 639) = 15.06, <i>p</i> < .001. Men rated alcohol stronger as cause than women, <i>t</i>(125.05) = 3.79, <i>p</i> < .001.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this study contribute to the understanding of the gender differences in causal attributions among individuals with overweight or obesity. Implementing stress management interventions with a focus on emotion regulation is pivotal, especially for females. Interventions should focus on sensitizing males to the association between emotions and eating behavior. The causal attributions should be assessed with different survey methods in order to match the patient's view of their condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":34029,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology in Europe","volume":"6 4","pages":"e12089"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11960563/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143773966","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Relation Between Social Anxiety and Perceptions of Likeability and Friendship in Adolescents. 青少年社交焦虑与友善感、友谊感的关系。
Q2 Psychology Pub Date : 2024-12-20 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.32872/cpe.10705
Jeanine M D Baartmans, Bonny F J A van Steensel, J Loes Pouwels, Tessa A M Lansu, Reinout W H J Wiers, Susan M Bögels, Anke M Klein

Background: This study investigated how different social anxiety symptoms (i.e., worrying about negative evaluation versus avoidance tendencies) in adolescents are related to the perception accuracy of likeability by peers and friendships with peers.

Method: A community sample of 263 adolescents between 12 and 15 years old reported on their social anxiety symptoms. In addition, they estimated how much their peers liked them, indicated how much they liked their peers, and who their friends were in their classroom.

Results: Results showed that socially anxious adolescents who mainly worried about negative evaluations, underestimated their likeability by peers. Adolescents with strong social avoidance tendencies had a more accurate perception of their likeability and friendships; they were less liked by their peers and had fewer friends.

Conclusion: The results emphasize the importance of treating avoidance behavior in social anxiety since avoidance tendencies may not only maintain the social anxiety symptoms but are also related to a more negative judgment by others.

背景:本研究探讨了青少年不同的社交焦虑症状(即担心负面评价倾向与回避倾向)与同伴好感度和同伴友谊感知准确性的关系。方法:对263名12 ~ 15岁的青少年进行社区抽样,报告其社交焦虑症状。此外,他们还估计了他们的同龄人有多喜欢他们,指出了他们有多喜欢他们的同龄人,以及他们的朋友是谁。结果:社交焦虑青少年主要担心负面评价,低估了自己在同伴中的受欢迎程度。具有强烈社交回避倾向的青少年对自己的亲和力和友谊有更准确的感知;他们不太受同龄人的喜爱,朋友也更少。结论:研究结果强调了在社交焦虑中治疗回避行为的重要性,因为回避倾向不仅可能维持社交焦虑症状,而且与他人对社交焦虑的负面判断有关。
{"title":"The Relation Between Social Anxiety and Perceptions of Likeability and Friendship in Adolescents.","authors":"Jeanine M D Baartmans, Bonny F J A van Steensel, J Loes Pouwels, Tessa A M Lansu, Reinout W H J Wiers, Susan M Bögels, Anke M Klein","doi":"10.32872/cpe.10705","DOIUrl":"10.32872/cpe.10705","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study investigated how different social anxiety symptoms (i.e., worrying about negative evaluation versus avoidance tendencies) in adolescents are related to the perception accuracy of likeability by peers and friendships with peers.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A community sample of 263 adolescents between 12 and 15 years old reported on their social anxiety symptoms. In addition, they estimated how much their peers liked them, indicated how much they liked their peers, and who their friends were in their classroom.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed that socially anxious adolescents who mainly worried about negative evaluations, underestimated their likeability by peers. Adolescents with strong social avoidance tendencies had a more accurate perception of their likeability and friendships; they were less liked by their peers and had fewer friends.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results emphasize the importance of treating avoidance behavior in social anxiety since avoidance tendencies may not only maintain the social anxiety symptoms but are also related to a more negative judgment by others.</p>","PeriodicalId":34029,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology in Europe","volume":"6 4","pages":"e10705"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11960565/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143774207","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effectiveness of Attachment-Based Family Therapy for Suicidal Adolescents and Young Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 基于依恋的家庭治疗对自杀青少年和年轻人的有效性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Q2 Psychology Pub Date : 2024-12-20 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.32872/cpe.13717
Poul M Schulte-Frankenfeld, Josefien J F Breedvelt, Marlies E Brouwer, Nadia van der Spek, Guy Bosmans, Claudi L Bockting

Background: Suicide is a leading cause of death among adolescents and young adults. While only few evidence-based treatments with limited efficacy are available, family processes have recently been posed as a possible alternative target for intervention. Here, we review the evidence for Attachment-Based Family Therapy (ABFT), a guideline-listed treatment targeting intrafamilial ruptures and building protective caregiver-child relationships.

Method: PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, and Scopus were searched for prospective trials on ABFT in youth published up until November 6th, 2023, and including measures of suicidality. Results were independently screened by two researchers following PRISMA guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB-2 framework. A random effects meta-analysis was conducted on suicidal ideation and depressive symptoms post-intervention scores in randomized-controlled trials (RCTs).

Results: Seven articles reporting on four RCTs (n = 287) and three open trials (n = 45) were identified. Mean age of participants was M pooled = 15.2 years and the majority identified as female (~80%). Overall, ABFT was not significantly more effective in reducing youth suicidal ideation, gpooled = 0.40, 95% CI [-0.12, 0.93], nor depressive symptoms, gpooled = 0.33, 95% CI [-0.18, 0.84], compared to investigated controls (Waitlist, (Enhanced) Treatment as Usual, Family-Enhanced Nondirective Supportive Therapy).

Conclusion: Evidence is strongly limited, with few available trials, small sample sizes, high sample heterogeneity, attrition rates, and risk of bias. While not generally superior to other treatments, ABFT might still be a clinically valid option in specific cases and should be further investigated. Clinicians are currently recommended to apply caution when considering ABFT as stand-alone intervention for suicidal youth and to decide on a case-by-case basis.

背景:自杀是青少年死亡的主要原因。虽然目前只有少数几种基于证据的治疗方法,且疗效有限,但最近家庭过程被认为是一种可能的替代干预目标。在此,我们回顾了以情感为基础的家庭疗法(ABFT)的证据,该疗法是指南中列出的一种针对家庭内部破裂和建立保护性照顾者-儿童关系的治疗方法:在PubMed、PsycINFO、Embase和Scopus上搜索了截至2023年11月6日发表的、针对青少年的ABFT前瞻性试验,其中包括对自杀倾向的测量。结果由两名研究人员按照 PRISMA 指南进行独立筛选。采用 Cochrane RoB-2 框架评估偏倚风险。对随机对照试验(RCT)中干预后的自杀意念和抑郁症状评分进行了随机效应荟萃分析:结果:共发现七篇文章,报告了四项随机对照试验(n = 287)和三项开放试验(n = 45)。参与者的平均年龄为 15.2 岁,大部分为女性(约占 80%)。总体而言,与调查对照组(候补名单、(增强型)常规治疗、家庭增强型非指导性支持疗法)相比,ABFT 在减少青少年自杀意念(gpooled = 0.40,95% CI [-0.12,0.93])和抑郁症状(gpooled = 0.33,95% CI [-0.18,0.84])方面的效果并不明显:证据非常有限,可用的试验很少,样本量小,样本异质性高,自然减员率高,存在偏倚风险。虽然 ABFT 一般来说并不优于其他治疗方法,但在特定病例中仍可能是一种临床有效的选择,应进一步研究。目前,建议临床医生在考虑将 ABFT 作为单独干预有自杀倾向的青少年时谨慎行事,并根据具体情况做出决定。
{"title":"Effectiveness of Attachment-Based Family Therapy for Suicidal Adolescents and Young Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Poul M Schulte-Frankenfeld, Josefien J F Breedvelt, Marlies E Brouwer, Nadia van der Spek, Guy Bosmans, Claudi L Bockting","doi":"10.32872/cpe.13717","DOIUrl":"10.32872/cpe.13717","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Suicide is a leading cause of death among adolescents and young adults. While only few evidence-based treatments with limited efficacy are available, family processes have recently been posed as a possible alternative target for intervention. Here, we review the evidence for Attachment-Based Family Therapy (ABFT), a guideline-listed treatment targeting intrafamilial ruptures and building protective caregiver-child relationships.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, and Scopus were searched for prospective trials on ABFT in youth published up until November 6<sup>th</sup>, 2023, and including measures of suicidality. Results were independently screened by two researchers following PRISMA guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB-2 framework. A random effects meta-analysis was conducted on suicidal ideation and depressive symptoms post-intervention scores in randomized-controlled trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven articles reporting on four RCTs (<i>n</i> = 287) and three open trials (<i>n</i> = 45) were identified. Mean age of participants was <i>M</i> <sub>pooled</sub> = 15.2 years and the majority identified as female (~80%). Overall, ABFT was not significantly more effective in reducing youth suicidal ideation, <i>g<sub>pooled</sub></i> = 0.40, 95% CI [-0.12, 0.93], nor depressive symptoms, <i>g<sub>pooled</sub></i> = 0.33, 95% CI [-0.18, 0.84], compared to investigated controls (Waitlist, (Enhanced) Treatment as Usual, Family-Enhanced Nondirective Supportive Therapy).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Evidence is strongly limited, with few available trials, small sample sizes, high sample heterogeneity, attrition rates, and risk of bias. While not generally superior to other treatments, ABFT might still be a clinically valid option in specific cases and should be further investigated. Clinicians are currently recommended to apply caution when considering ABFT as stand-alone intervention for suicidal youth and to decide on a case-by-case basis.</p>","PeriodicalId":34029,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology in Europe","volume":"6 4","pages":"e13717"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11960573/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143773935","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Clinical Psychology in Europe
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1