{"title":"Dvě další knihy o jazykovém kontaktu","authors":"B. Vykypěl","doi":"10.5817/lb2019-2-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5817/lb2019-2-8","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":34396,"journal":{"name":"Linguistica Brunensia","volume":"121 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71349192","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The paper is focused on the spatial appearance of two place names in the public space in the background of the transonymization process; there are the Czech place names of Anděl (‘Angel’; a busy crossroads, Prague) and Kuří rynek (‘Chicken Market’; a small square, Ostrava). The paper attempts to provide answers to the following research questions: 1) Is there any mutual relationship between the places delimitation and the place names occurrence? 2) In which forms and for which objects are the namings used? 3) Do the areas delimited by the place names representation in the public space, and those mentally perceived by people living there overlap?
{"title":"Delimitative function of place names in the linguistic landscape – as illustrated with examples from the cities of Prague and Ostrava (Czech Republic)","authors":"Jaroslav David","doi":"10.5817/lb2019-1-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5817/lb2019-1-1","url":null,"abstract":"The paper is focused on the spatial appearance of two place names in the public space in the background of the transonymization process; there are the Czech place names of Anděl (‘Angel’; a busy crossroads, Prague) and Kuří rynek (‘Chicken Market’; a small square, Ostrava). The paper attempts to provide answers to the following research questions: 1) Is there any mutual relationship between the places delimitation and the place names occurrence? 2) In which forms and for which objects are the namings used? 3) Do the areas delimited by the place names representation in the public space, and those mentally perceived by people living there overlap?","PeriodicalId":34396,"journal":{"name":"Linguistica Brunensia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71349071","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The article is an attempt to establish the original semantics of Proto-Slavic *bъrkъ and describe semantic drifts of its continuants in the modern Slavic languages. Oleg Trubachyov’s hypothesis that ‘shoulder’ > ‘hair down to someone’s shoulders’ > ‘beard and moustache down to someone’s shoulders’ was the main semantic shift, which its turn could prove his etymology of the word *ǫsъ, is questioned and put to the test. The author comes to the conclusion that the most probable protomeaning of the word was ‘hollow shaft of a feather’, which had further developed into ‘moustache’, ‘flight feather’, ‘forearm/shoulder’ and others. The findings of the research make the author believe that Trubachyov’s hypothesis cannot be considered reliable.
{"title":"Бывают ли усы до плеч : семантика праславянского *bъrkъ и её дрейф в языкахпотомках","authors":"М. Н. Саенко","doi":"10.5817/lb2019-2-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5817/lb2019-2-4","url":null,"abstract":"The article is an attempt to establish the original semantics of Proto-Slavic *bъrkъ and describe semantic drifts of its continuants in the modern Slavic languages. Oleg Trubachyov’s hypothesis that ‘shoulder’ > ‘hair down to someone’s shoulders’ > ‘beard and moustache down to someone’s shoulders’ was the main semantic shift, which its turn could prove his etymology of the word *ǫsъ, is questioned and put to the test. The author comes to the conclusion that the most probable protomeaning of the word was ‘hollow shaft of a feather’, which had further developed into ‘moustache’, ‘flight feather’, ‘forearm/shoulder’ and others. The findings of the research make the author believe that Trubachyov’s hypothesis cannot be considered reliable.","PeriodicalId":34396,"journal":{"name":"Linguistica Brunensia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71349105","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Angažovaný Roman Jakobson a jeho cyrilometodějské dědictví","authors":"B. Vykypěl","doi":"10.5817/lb2019-1-11","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5817/lb2019-1-11","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":34396,"journal":{"name":"Linguistica Brunensia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71349116","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The paper focuses on so-called object fixation of toponyms, that is, how users perceive the toponym in real space, or more precisely, in their mental reflection of real space. In the first part of the paper, the authors discriminate between individual object fixation of a particular user, and a core of object fixation as the intersection of these individual localizations. As the authors point out, a kind of social and spatial information is encoded in the individual toponyms as a necessary part of their proprial content. In the second part of the paper, the authors discuss the problem of fixation changes (either quantitative, or qualitative ones), and their difference from transonymization. The third part is aimed at research in the core of object fixation by geographic information system tools and methods. From the authors’ experience ensue two necessary requirements for such kind of research, and these are a) sufficient number of respondents who have at least a basic ability for spatial orientation, and b) the researched toponyms should be part of a toponymic centre (i.e. known to most of respondents).
{"title":"Poznámky k tzv. objektové fixaci toponym","authors":"Václav Lábus, Daniel Vrbík","doi":"10.5817/lb2019-1-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5817/lb2019-1-2","url":null,"abstract":"The paper focuses on so-called object fixation of toponyms, that is, how users perceive the toponym in real space, or more precisely, in their mental reflection of real space. In the first part of the paper, the authors discriminate between individual object fixation of a particular user, and a core of object fixation as the intersection of these individual localizations. As the authors point out, a kind of social and spatial information is encoded in the individual toponyms as a necessary part of their proprial content. In the second part of the paper, the authors discuss the problem of fixation changes (either quantitative, or qualitative ones), and their difference from transonymization. The third part is aimed at research in the core of object fixation by geographic information system tools and methods. From the authors’ experience ensue two necessary requirements for such kind of research, and these are a) sufficient number of respondents who have at least a basic ability for spatial orientation, and b) the researched toponyms should be part of a toponymic centre (i.e. known to most of respondents).","PeriodicalId":34396,"journal":{"name":"Linguistica Brunensia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71349133","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：