Routledge Handbook Of Food As A Commons最新文献

英文中文

Scientific knowledge of food and agriculture in public institutions 公共机构的粮食和农业科学知识

Routledge Handbook Of Food As A Commons

Pub Date : 2018-12-21 DOI: 10.4324/9781315161495-12

Molly D. Anderson

引用次数: 3

Can food as a commons advance food sovereignty? 作为公地的食物能促进食物主权吗?

Routledge Handbook Of Food As A Commons

Pub Date : 2018-12-21 DOI: 10.4324/9781315161495-20

E. Holt-gimenez, I. V. Lammeren

In 1996, La Ví a Campesina raised the call for food sovereignty, the right of peoples to determine and control their own food systems. Food sovereignty challenged the concept of ‘food security’ and the privatization of land, seeds and water and advanced an array of environmentally sustainable and socially equitable alternatives to the destructive practices of the corporate food regime. The call became a global movement that today includes several hundred million small and medium food producers and hundreds of thousands of consumers. Food sovereignty is one of the pillars of the global counter-movements to neoliberalism. The rejection of both industrial agriculture and of neoliberalism’s tendency towards corporate privatization has led many food sovereignty advocates to embrace complementary concepts, like agroecology and the Right to Food. Parallel and overlapping notions have also emerged, like ‘food justice,’ the ‘good food’ movement, ‘Slow Food’ and ‘food democracy’. These are often associated (or confused) with food sovereignty. Recently, some Right-to-Food scholars have introduced the notion of a ‘food as a commons,’ in which the commons is used both as a noun (shared resources) and as a verb (i.e., ‘commoning’ in which food is a common good) (Ferrando and Vivero-Pol, 2017). At first glance, food sovereignty and the food commons have, well, much in common. Both are a rejection of the corporate food regime’s tendency to manufacture food scarcity and both revive the histories and traditions of the Commons. Both reject the commodification of food and uphold food as a human right. Both propose transformative models for equitable and sustainable food systems as a basis for a new society. But the etymologies of food sovereignty and food as a commons are not congruent. Food sovereignty is a call for resource equity emerging from the organized demands of peasants, pastoralists and fishers, while the food commons is a call for equal food access, emerging primarily from the professional community for human rights (mostly urban). The former has structural proposals addressing production (agrarian reform and farm parity, fair wages and decent working conditions for farm and food workers, the exemption of agriculture from free trade agreements and the dismantling of corporate power), while the latter focuses much more on normative valuations, distributive consumption and alternative nodes of governance. La Ví a Campesina, whose 164 peasant organizations serve 200 million farmers around the world, is the social and 20 CAN FOOD AS A COMMONS ADVANCE FOOD SOVEREIGNTY?

1996年，La Ví a Campesina呼吁粮食主权，即人民决定和控制自己粮食系统的权利。粮食主权挑战了“粮食安全”的概念以及土地、种子和水的私有化，并提出了一系列环境可持续和社会公平的替代方案，以取代企业粮食制度的破坏性做法。这一呼吁成为一项全球运动，今天包括数亿中小型食品生产商和数十万消费者。粮食主权是全球反新自由主义运动的支柱之一。对工业化农业和新自由主义倾向于企业私有化的拒绝，导致许多粮食主权倡导者接受了互补的概念，如农业生态学和食物权。类似和重叠的概念也出现了，比如“食物正义”、“好食物”运动、“慢食”和“食物民主”。这些通常与食物主权联系在一起(或混淆)。最近，一些食物权学者提出了“食物作为公地”的概念，其中公地既可用作名词(共享资源)，也可用作动词(即“公地”，其中食物是一种公共商品)(Ferrando和Vivero-Pol, 2017)。乍一看，粮食主权和粮食公地有很多共同之处。两者都是对企业食品制度制造食品短缺倾向的拒绝，都是对公地历史和传统的复兴。双方都反对粮食商品化，并认为粮食是一项人权。两者都提出了公平和可持续粮食系统的变革模式，作为新社会的基础。但是食物主权和食物作为公地的词源是不一致的。粮食主权是由农民、牧民和渔民有组织的要求提出的对资源公平的要求，而粮食公地是主要由人权专业团体(主要是城市)提出的对平等粮食获取的要求。前者提出了解决生产问题的结构性建议(土地改革和农场平等、农场和食品工人的公平工资和体面工作条件、农业不受自由贸易协定的约束以及企业权力的瓦解)，而后者则更多地关注规范性估值、分配性消费和治理的替代节点。La Ví a Campesina，其164个农民组织为全球2亿农民提供服务，是社会和20的粮食作为一种公地可以推进粮食主权吗?

{"title":"Can food as a commons advance food sovereignty?","authors":"E. Holt-gimenez, I. V. Lammeren","doi":"10.4324/9781315161495-20","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315161495-20","url":null,"abstract":"In 1996, La Ví a Campesina raised the call for food sovereignty, the right of peoples to determine and control their own food systems. Food sovereignty challenged the concept of ‘food security’ and the privatization of land, seeds and water and advanced an array of environmentally sustainable and socially equitable alternatives to the destructive practices of the corporate food regime. The call became a global movement that today includes several hundred million small and medium food producers and hundreds of thousands of consumers. Food sovereignty is one of the pillars of the global counter-movements to neoliberalism. The rejection of both industrial agriculture and of neoliberalism’s tendency towards corporate privatization has led many food sovereignty advocates to embrace complementary concepts, like agroecology and the Right to Food. Parallel and overlapping notions have also emerged, like ‘food justice,’ the ‘good food’ movement, ‘Slow Food’ and ‘food democracy’. These are often associated (or confused) with food sovereignty. Recently, some Right-to-Food scholars have introduced the notion of a ‘food as a commons,’ in which the commons is used both as a noun (shared resources) and as a verb (i.e., ‘commoning’ in which food is a common good) (Ferrando and Vivero-Pol, 2017). At first glance, food sovereignty and the food commons have, well, much in common. Both are a rejection of the corporate food regime’s tendency to manufacture food scarcity and both revive the histories and traditions of the Commons. Both reject the commodification of food and uphold food as a human right. Both propose transformative models for equitable and sustainable food systems as a basis for a new society. But the etymologies of food sovereignty and food as a commons are not congruent. Food sovereignty is a call for resource equity emerging from the organized demands of peasants, pastoralists and fishers, while the food commons is a call for equal food access, emerging primarily from the professional community for human rights (mostly urban). The former has structural proposals addressing production (agrarian reform and farm parity, fair wages and decent working conditions for farm and food workers, the exemption of agriculture from free trade agreements and the dismantling of corporate power), while the latter focuses much more on normative valuations, distributive consumption and alternative nodes of governance. La Ví a Campesina, whose 164 peasant organizations serve 200 million farmers around the world, is the social and 20 CAN FOOD AS A COMMONS ADVANCE FOOD SOVEREIGNTY?","PeriodicalId":344826,"journal":{"name":"Routledge Handbook Of Food As A Commons","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126350549","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

Growing a care-based commons food regime 建立以关爱为基础的公共食物制度

Routledge Handbook Of Food As A Commons

Pub Date : 2018-12-21 DOI: 10.4324/9781315161495-4

Marina Chang

引用次数: 2

The centrality of food for social emancipation 食物对社会解放的中心作用

Routledge Handbook Of Food As A Commons

Pub Date : 2018-12-21 DOI: 10.4324/9781315161495-22

M. Fonte, I. Cucco

引用次数: 0

New roles for citizens, markets and the state towards an open-source agricultural revolution 公民、市场和国家在开源农业革命中的新角色

Routledge Handbook Of Food As A Commons

Pub Date : 2018-12-21 DOI: 10.4324/9781315161495-5

Alex Pazaitis, M. Bauwens

引用次数: 2

The idea of food as a commons 食物是公共物的概念

Routledge Handbook Of Food As A Commons

Pub Date : 2018-12-21 DOI: 10.4324/9781315161495-2

J. Vivero-Pol

引用次数: 8

Food security as a global public good 粮食安全是一项全球公共产品

Routledge Handbook Of Food As A Commons

Pub Date : 2018-12-21 DOI: 10.4324/9781315161495-6

C. Timmermann

引用次数: 2

Community-based commons and rights systems 基于社区的公地和权利系统

Routledge Handbook Of Food As A Commons

Pub Date : 2018-12-21 DOI: 10.4324/9781315161495-8

G. Kent

引用次数: 2

Climate change, the food commons and human health 气候变化、粮食公地和人类健康

Routledge Handbook Of Food As A Commons

Pub Date : 2018-12-21 DOI: 10.4324/9781315161495-23

Cristina Tirado-von der Pahlen

引用次数: 4

The food system as a commons 食物系统是公共的

Routledge Handbook Of Food As A Commons

Pub Date : 2018-12-21 DOI: 10.4324/9781315161495-3

Alessia Toldo, Tomaso Ferrando, Pettenati Giacomo

引用次数: 7

下一页尾页

类型

全部化学•材料生命科学医学物理工程技术环境•农林材料科学地球科学法学管理学化学环境科学与生态学计算机科学教育学经济学农林科学人文科学生物学数学物理与天体物理心理学综合性期刊其他工业工程理学历史学农学文学信息工程

数据库

全部 ACS Publications Elsevier ieeexplore Springer The Royal Society of Chemistry Wiley

期刊

Routledge Handbook Of Food As A Commons

全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.

﹀