In this article, we explore how 50 Maine municipalities communicated their response to COVID-19 in the earliest stages of the pandemic. Our study answers two questions: (1) What information and resources did Maine municipalities communicate about COVID-19? and (2) What characterizes a more robust communication response? Analyzing digital communications from March through July 2020, we found almost all municipalities in our sample communicated basic information about altered town operations. Some towns provided more robust responses that evolved over time and included nuanced messages about COVID-19, a sense of community, and collaborations with partners. While smaller, more rural municipalities may have fewer residents and resources, many showed a larger-than-expected capacity to pivot quickly and rally together to respond to COVID-19 and communicate about that response.
{"title":"Municipal Capacity to Respond to COVID-19: Implications for Improving Community Resilience in Maine","authors":"Vanessa R. Levesque, Eileen S. Johnson, K. Bell","doi":"10.53558/frpi9064","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53558/frpi9064","url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we explore how 50 Maine municipalities communicated their response to COVID-19 in the earliest stages of the pandemic. Our study answers two questions: (1) What information and resources did Maine municipalities communicate about COVID-19? and (2) What characterizes a more robust communication response? Analyzing digital communications from March through July 2020, we found almost all municipalities in our sample communicated basic information about altered town operations. Some towns provided more robust responses that evolved over time and included nuanced messages about COVID-19, a sense of community, and collaborations with partners. While smaller, more rural municipalities may have fewer residents and resources, many showed a larger-than-expected capacity to pivot quickly and rally together to respond to COVID-19 and communicate about that response.","PeriodicalId":34576,"journal":{"name":"Maine Policy Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48273685","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper examines the effects of COVID-19 on tourism in Bar Harbor, Maine. The analysis considers four channels by which the pandemic affected Bar Harbor: (1) reduction in overnight visitors, (2) decrease in Acadia National Park users, (3) cancellation of the 2020 cruise ship season, and (4) a national effect related to trends in overall US restaurant sales. The relative impacts of these four factors on Bar Harbor restaurant sales varied widely by month: the reduction in overnight tourists explains 40 percent of the overall decline; the national effect is associated with 35 percent of Bar Harbor’s decline; the cancellation of all cruise ship visits in 2020 explains 11 percent; and the reduction in the number of Acadia National Park users is responsible for 14 percent of the decline in restaurant sales in 2020. Knowing more about the channels by which COVID-19 affected hospitality sales in Bar Harbor can help state and local officials with recovery efforts and support tourism along the Maine coast.
{"title":"Impacts of COVID-19 on Tourism in Bar Harbor, Maine","authors":"Todd Gabe","doi":"10.53558/nkbz5308","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53558/nkbz5308","url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the effects of COVID-19 on tourism in Bar Harbor, Maine. The analysis considers four channels by which the pandemic affected Bar Harbor: (1) reduction in overnight visitors, (2) decrease in Acadia National Park users, (3) cancellation of the 2020 cruise ship season, and (4) a national effect related to trends in overall US restaurant sales. The relative impacts of these four factors on Bar Harbor restaurant sales varied widely by month: the reduction in overnight tourists explains 40 percent of the overall decline; the national effect is associated with 35 percent of Bar Harbor’s decline; the cancellation of all cruise ship visits in 2020 explains 11 percent; and the reduction in the number of Acadia National Park users is responsible for 14 percent of the decline in restaurant sales in 2020. Knowing more about the channels by which COVID-19 affected hospitality sales in Bar Harbor can help state and local officials with recovery efforts and support tourism along the Maine coast.","PeriodicalId":34576,"journal":{"name":"Maine Policy Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48793913","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Exploring COVID-19 Impacts on Maine Tourism Using an Online Photo-Sharing Site","authors":"Tracy Michaud, Colleen Metcalf, M. Bampton","doi":"10.53558/ldvl2781","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53558/ldvl2781","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":34576,"journal":{"name":"Maine Policy Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47039718","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Community Support for Low-Income Elementary School Students with a Winter Gear Drive under COVID 19 Constraints","authors":"Paige Wentworth, L. Kuntz","doi":"10.53558/gsby4532","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53558/gsby4532","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":34576,"journal":{"name":"Maine Policy Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43060020","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Each year the Margaret Chase Smith Library sponsors an essay contest for high school seniors. The essay prompt for 2021 asked students to offer their opinions on whether the Electoral College has outlived its usefulness, or if it is more important than ever given the country’s current deep political polarization. This is the first-place essay.
{"title":"Our American Nightmare: The Anachronistic Disaster of the Electoral College","authors":"Sofia Durdag","doi":"10.53558/dgfs3633","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53558/dgfs3633","url":null,"abstract":"Each year the Margaret Chase Smith Library sponsors an essay contest for high school seniors. The essay prompt for 2021 asked students to offer their opinions on whether the Electoral College has outlived its usefulness, or if it is more important than ever given the country’s current deep political polarization. This is the first-place essay.","PeriodicalId":34576,"journal":{"name":"Maine Policy Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46755354","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
A. Soucy, S. De Urioste-Stone, I. Fernandez, A. Weiskittel, Parinaz Rahimzadeh-Bajgiran, T. Doak
Socioeconomic pressures require forest management to address the impacts of climate change. However, we must ask, Are current forest policies sufficient to deal with the impacts of climate change? Here, we report on two surveys of forest stakeholders in Maine including woodlot owners and forestry professionals and discuss their perceptions of the barriers to climate change adaptation. We conclude with several policy directions including reevaluating existing policies, expanding incentive-based policies, integrating adaptation efforts into mitigation efforts, and increasing communication and outreach.
{"title":"Forest Policies and Adaptation to Climate Change in Maine: Stakeholder Perceptions and Recommendations","authors":"A. Soucy, S. De Urioste-Stone, I. Fernandez, A. Weiskittel, Parinaz Rahimzadeh-Bajgiran, T. Doak","doi":"10.53558/xnwp9949","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53558/xnwp9949","url":null,"abstract":"Socioeconomic pressures require forest management to address the impacts of climate change. However, we must ask, Are current forest policies sufficient to deal with the impacts of climate change? Here, we report on two surveys of forest stakeholders in Maine including woodlot owners and forestry professionals and discuss their perceptions of the barriers to climate change adaptation. We conclude with several policy directions including reevaluating existing policies, expanding incentive-based policies, integrating adaptation efforts into mitigation efforts, and increasing communication and outreach.","PeriodicalId":34576,"journal":{"name":"Maine Policy Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48980846","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This article discusses the issues involved in legislative amendment of citizen initiatives in Maine by explaining the legislature’s authority to amend or repeal citizen initiatives, how and why the Maine Constitution specifically provides for that authority, and how and why that approach is conceptually consistent with numerous other provisions and principles of our Constitution. This article further suggests the types of issues that, regardless of the subject matter in question, the legislature should consider in determining whether, and if so how and when, to change a directly democratic act of the people. Such considerations when earnestly applied can serve to balance the legislature’s representational duty to mind the popular will as well as its leadership responsibility to steward the state with the additional exercise of the legislature’s own lawmaking power.
{"title":"Legislative Amendment of Citizen Initiatives: Where the “Will of the Voter” Meets the “Consent of the Elector”","authors":"Derek P. Langhauser","doi":"10.53558/tgak4010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53558/tgak4010","url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses the issues involved in legislative amendment of citizen initiatives in Maine by explaining the legislature’s authority to amend or repeal citizen initiatives, how and why the Maine Constitution specifically provides for that authority, and how and why that approach is conceptually consistent with numerous other provisions and principles of our Constitution. This article further suggests the types of issues that, regardless of the subject matter in question, the legislature should consider in determining whether, and if so how and when, to change a directly democratic act of the people. Such considerations when earnestly applied can serve to balance the legislature’s representational duty to mind the popular will as well as its leadership responsibility to steward the state with the additional exercise of the legislature’s own lawmaking power.","PeriodicalId":34576,"journal":{"name":"Maine Policy Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46801586","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Education and trust building are inextricably intertwined parts of addressing failed efforts of the state of Maine and the Wabanaki tribes to resolve tribal self-governance issues. Lack of structural and financial support for the delivery of Wabanaki Studies Law content directly affects tribal-state relations and Wabanaki self-determination in Maine. This article examines legislative proposals, current laws, and scholarly research and explore how they relate to tribal self-governance. Maine needs strategies for trust building and increased educational experiences for all Maine residents about Wabanaki people and ways of knowing.
{"title":"The Importance of Education and Trust Building for Wabanaki Self-Governance","authors":"Katie Tomer","doi":"10.53558/wczl9289","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53558/wczl9289","url":null,"abstract":"Education and trust building are inextricably intertwined parts of addressing failed efforts of the state of Maine and the Wabanaki tribes to resolve tribal self-governance issues. Lack of structural and financial support for the delivery of Wabanaki Studies Law content directly affects tribal-state relations and Wabanaki self-determination in Maine. This article examines legislative proposals, current laws, and scholarly research and explore how they relate to tribal self-governance. Maine needs strategies for trust building and increased educational experiences for all Maine residents about Wabanaki people and ways of knowing.","PeriodicalId":34576,"journal":{"name":"Maine Policy Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46410424","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
S. Elias, Benjamin Stone, P. Rand, C. Lubelczyk, Robert P. Smith
The incidence of Lyme disease in Maine is associated with high abundance of blacklegged (deer) ticks, which in turn has been partly attributed to local overabundance of white-tailed deer. With evidence from Monhegan Island that the complete removal of deer reduced ticks and risk of contracting Lyme disease, nine other offshore communities initiated efforts to cull deer. We reviewed and summarized available histories of deer management on Maine’s offshore islands. Concern about Lyme disease provided the overarching impetus for deer culls. Culls mostly occurred on islands that have no regular firearms hunting season, island communities have been challenged to control deer numbers, and social acceptance of deer culls varied. Integrated tick management (ITM) is the key to controlling ticks, but statewide ITM policy is lacking. Formation of vector control districts with statewide ITM policy would support all communities in Maine. In the Northeast including Maine, blacklegged ticks feed on birds, rodents, and deer (Eisen et al. 2016). Migratory birds disperse tick larvae and nymphs over long distances (e.g., Smith et al. 1996). Locally, white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus) and some other rodent species are reservoirs of B. burgdorferi and transmit this pathogen to feeding blacklegged tick larvae and nymphs (e.g., Mather et al. 1989). However, blacklegged tick adults do not feed on mice. Indeed, the white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) is the most important host of adult blacklegged ticks by providing a mating site to adults and providing roughly 90 percent of female blacklegged tick blood meals (Wilson et al. 1990). A blood-fed, female blacklegged tick may lay approximately 2,000 eggs (Mount et al. 1997). Given the importance of white-tailed deer for completion of the blacklegged tick life cycle, and correlations between deer and tick numbers (e.g., Rand et al. 2003), high blacklegged tick density on New England’s offshore islands has been attributed to overabundant white-tailed deer. Accordingly, over the past three decades, New England island communities including several of Maine’s—such as Monhegan and Islesboro—have debated and in some cases implemented the controversial task of reducing their deer herds in an attempt to lower risk of tick bites and tickborne illnesses. Monhegan’s history of deer removal is the best known example of community management of a deer herd on an offshore island in Maine. In the 1990s, concern about Lyme disease led the community to remove all deer, which resulted in a substantial decline in blacklegged tick density (Rand et al. 2004). Other Maine offshore island communities, facing locally burgeoning deer densities, began to cull (reduce) deer. Maine has 15 unbridged, offshore islands with year-round populations (Figure 1). The formation of town tick or deer control committees in some of these communities reflects the broader concept that betterment of public health sometimes hinges on community-initiated polic
莱姆病在缅因州的发病率与大量的黑腿(鹿)蜱有关，这反过来又部分归因于当地过多的白尾鹿。蒙黑根岛的证据表明，完全清除鹿可以减少蜱虫和感染莱姆病的风险，其他九个离岸社区开始努力捕杀鹿。我们回顾和总结了缅因州近海岛屿鹿群管理的历史。对莱姆病的担忧是扑杀鹿的主要动力。扑杀主要发生在没有定期枪支狩猎季节的岛屿上，岛屿社区面临着控制鹿数量的挑战，社会对扑杀鹿的接受程度也各不相同。蜱虫综合管理是控制蜱虫的关键，但目前缺乏全国性的蜱虫综合管理政策。形成具有全州ITM政策的病媒控制区将支持缅因州的所有社区。在包括缅因州在内的东北部，黑腿蜱以鸟类、啮齿动物和鹿为食(Eisen et al. 2016)。候鸟将蜱虫幼虫和若虫远距离传播(例如，Smith et al. 1996)。在当地，白足鼠(Peromyscus leucopus)和一些其他啮齿动物是伯氏疏螺旋体的宿主，并将这种病原体传播给喂养的黑腿蜱幼虫和若虫(例如，Mather et al. 1989)。然而，成年黑脚蜱并不以老鼠为食。事实上，白尾鹿(Odocoileus virginianus)是成年黑脚蜱最重要的宿主，它为成年黑脚蜱提供交配场所，并为大约90%的雌性黑脚蜱提供血食(Wilson et al. 1990)。一只吸血的雌性黑腿蜱可产约2,000个卵(Mount et al. 1997)。考虑到白尾鹿对完成黑脚蜱生命周期的重要性，以及鹿和蜱数量之间的相关性(如Rand等人，2003年)，新英格兰近海岛屿上黑脚蜱的高密度可归因于白尾鹿数量过多。因此，在过去的三十年里，新英格兰岛屿社区，包括缅因州的几个岛屿，如蒙黑根岛和伊斯勒斯伯勒岛，一直在争论并在某些情况下实施了一项有争议的任务，即减少鹿群，试图降低蜱虫叮咬和蜱传疾病的风险。Monhegan的鹿移走历史是缅因州一个近海岛屿上鹿群社区管理的最著名的例子。在20世纪90年代，对莱姆病的担忧导致社区清除了所有鹿，这导致黑腿蜱密度大幅下降(Rand et al. 2004)。其他缅因州近海岛屿社区，面对当地迅速增长的鹿密度，开始扑杀(减少)鹿。缅因州有15个无桥的近海岛屿，全年都有人口(图1)。其中一些社区成立了城镇蜱虫或鹿控制委员会，这反映了一个更广泛的概念，即公共卫生的改善有时取决于社区发起的改善环境条件的政策(Deprez和Thomas 2016)。为了抑制黑腿蜱和莱姆病，Telford(2017)建议将白尾鹿的密度降低到每平方英里约8-13只。缅因州内陆渔业和野生动物部2017年大型猎物管理计划(MDIFW 2017)指出，将鹿保持在每平方英里11只或以下可能会降低蜱虫的丰度，从而降低蜱虫传播病原体的风险。我们的目的不是争论莱姆病是否可以通过将鹿的密度降低并保持在每平方英里8-13只来明显减少。相反，我们将总结缅因州近海社区为控制鹿所做的努力，同时也评估岛民的动机。白尾鹿因其观赏、狩猎和对经济的贡献而受到缅因州人的重视，但过多的鹿除了会产生蜱传疾病外，还会产生负面影响，包括车辆碰撞、果园和景观破坏，以及鹿和森林健康状况的下降(例如，Beguin等人，2009;McShea 2012)。随着时间的推移，缅因州近海岛屿上减少鹿数量的努力的历史已经以零敲碎打的方式被记录下来。为了巩固这段历史，我们参考了科学文章、缅因州内陆渔业和野生动物部(MDIFW)的报告、生物学家以及印刷和在线新闻文章。几十年来，缅因州的新闻媒体一直在关注鹿群的管理，记者们向特别许可证猎人、MDIFW生物学家、公共卫生官员和市政人员征求专家意见。我们的目标是:(1)确定扑杀鹿是否会降低并维持每平方英里8-13只鹿的密度;(2)定性评价鹿群减少的动机和方法;(3)在蜱虫综合管理(ITM)、社会接受度和政策空白的大背景下讨论鹿群管理的有效性。 我们希望这篇文章能够为岛屿和大陆社区以及国家机构提供参考。这些实体将通过了解减少鹿群的动机、规模和影响而受益，并可以利用这些知识来启动或扩大ITM政策。在缅因州，白尾鹿的数量从20世纪初的稀少到21世纪初的过剩。由于这种稀缺性，缅因州的八个南部县，包括我们研究中的所有近海岛屿，从1894年到1902年都禁止狩猎(MDIFW 2017)。伊斯伯勒、北黑文和维纳尔黑文在20世纪50年代重新建立了常规的枪支赛季(Moore 2002)。出于安全考虑，其他岛屿维持了狩猎禁令。2000年，《缅因州政策评论》第30卷第1期鹿群减少
{"title":"History of Deer Herd Reduction for Tick Control on Maine’s Offshore Islands","authors":"S. Elias, Benjamin Stone, P. Rand, C. Lubelczyk, Robert P. Smith","doi":"10.53558/oywu2247","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53558/oywu2247","url":null,"abstract":"The incidence of Lyme disease in Maine is associated with high abundance of blacklegged (deer) ticks, which in turn has been partly attributed to local overabundance of white-tailed deer. With evidence from Monhegan Island that the complete removal of deer reduced ticks and risk of contracting Lyme disease, nine other offshore communities initiated efforts to cull deer. We reviewed and summarized available histories of deer management on Maine’s offshore islands. Concern about Lyme disease provided the overarching impetus for deer culls. Culls mostly occurred on islands that have no regular firearms hunting season, island communities have been challenged to control deer numbers, and social acceptance of deer culls varied. Integrated tick management (ITM) is the key to controlling ticks, but statewide ITM policy is lacking. Formation of vector control districts with statewide ITM policy would support all communities in Maine. In the Northeast including Maine, blacklegged ticks feed on birds, rodents, and deer (Eisen et al. 2016). Migratory birds disperse tick larvae and nymphs over long distances (e.g., Smith et al. 1996). Locally, white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus) and some other rodent species are reservoirs of B. burgdorferi and transmit this pathogen to feeding blacklegged tick larvae and nymphs (e.g., Mather et al. 1989). However, blacklegged tick adults do not feed on mice. Indeed, the white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) is the most important host of adult blacklegged ticks by providing a mating site to adults and providing roughly 90 percent of female blacklegged tick blood meals (Wilson et al. 1990). A blood-fed, female blacklegged tick may lay approximately 2,000 eggs (Mount et al. 1997). Given the importance of white-tailed deer for completion of the blacklegged tick life cycle, and correlations between deer and tick numbers (e.g., Rand et al. 2003), high blacklegged tick density on New England’s offshore islands has been attributed to overabundant white-tailed deer. Accordingly, over the past three decades, New England island communities including several of Maine’s—such as Monhegan and Islesboro—have debated and in some cases implemented the controversial task of reducing their deer herds in an attempt to lower risk of tick bites and tickborne illnesses. Monhegan’s history of deer removal is the best known example of community management of a deer herd on an offshore island in Maine. In the 1990s, concern about Lyme disease led the community to remove all deer, which resulted in a substantial decline in blacklegged tick density (Rand et al. 2004). Other Maine offshore island communities, facing locally burgeoning deer densities, began to cull (reduce) deer. Maine has 15 unbridged, offshore islands with year-round populations (Figure 1). The formation of town tick or deer control committees in some of these communities reflects the broader concept that betterment of public health sometimes hinges on community-initiated polic","PeriodicalId":34576,"journal":{"name":"Maine Policy Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49046153","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"How to Save Jobs and Build Back Better: Employee Ownership Transitions as a Key to an Equitable Economic Recovery","authors":"Robert Brown","doi":"10.53558/hoze8462","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.53558/hoze8462","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":34576,"journal":{"name":"Maine Policy Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42168280","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：