Pub Date : 2019-11-04DOI: 10.4337/9781786433251.00011
Sandra L. Babcock
{"title":"Deciding who lives and who dies: eligibility for capital punishment under national and international law","authors":"Sandra L. Babcock","doi":"10.4337/9781786433251.00011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786433251.00011","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":348391,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Capital Punishment","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123963272","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-11-04DOI: 10.4337/9781786433251.00023
Sangmin Bae
{"title":"The role of institutions in the norm life cycle: the United Nations and the anti-capital punishment norm","authors":"Sangmin Bae","doi":"10.4337/9781786433251.00023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786433251.00023","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":348391,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Capital Punishment","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128655505","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-11-04DOI: 10.4337/9781786433251.00018
Austin D. Sarat, K. Pant
{"title":"Methods of execution: the American story in comparative perspective","authors":"Austin D. Sarat, K. Pant","doi":"10.4337/9781786433251.00018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786433251.00018","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":348391,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Capital Punishment","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131396531","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-11-04DOI: 10.4337/9781786433251.00031
C. Steiker, Jordan M. Steiker
{"title":"Global abolition of capital punishment: contributors, challenges and conundrums","authors":"C. Steiker, Jordan M. Steiker","doi":"10.4337/9781786433251.00031","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786433251.00031","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":348391,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Capital Punishment","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116434398","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-11-04DOI: 10.4337/9781786433251.00020
Brandon L. Garrett
{"title":"Innocence and the global death penalty","authors":"Brandon L. Garrett","doi":"10.4337/9781786433251.00020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786433251.00020","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":348391,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Capital Punishment","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117114228","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-03-31DOI: 10.4337/9781786433251.00028
Michelle Miao
Although it is commonly held that states’ beliefs and practices are shaped by the interactions between domestic and international actors and institutions, how international forces influence state behavioral patterns and normative beliefs remains a central theoretical challenge for academics seeking to improve the understanding in this field. The past two decades saw a seminal body of literature formed at the intersection of international relations and international human rights law, which offers invaluable insights into the socialization mechanisms and processes that states are motivated to comply with human rights norms and institutions. The mechanics identified by the so-called ‘first-generation’ of this socialization literature which is capable of inducing changes in domestic law, policy, and practices in the field of human rights include coercion and persuasion. Coercion concerns the process via which international institutions and foreign states force target states to obey international norms by using material sanctions and rewards. It is premised on the notion that nation states respond to military and financial incentives and costs by making rational calculations about the consequences of their behavior. Examples of coercion include the international community’s imposition of military sanctions on and offer of financial benefits to target countries in exchange for the latter’s compliance with international human rights norms. Persuasion, in contrast, focuses on a process during which the target state assesses, ‘internalizes’ and genuinely accepts the validity and legitimacy of international human rights norms. While the former emphasizes on material force and interests, the latter focuses on constructive identities and shared ideas.
{"title":"Pulling states towards abolitionism: the power of acculturation as a socialization mechanism","authors":"Michelle Miao","doi":"10.4337/9781786433251.00028","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786433251.00028","url":null,"abstract":"Although it is commonly held that states’ beliefs and practices are shaped by the interactions between domestic and international actors and institutions, how international forces influence state behavioral patterns and normative beliefs remains a central theoretical challenge for academics seeking to improve the understanding in this field. The past two decades saw a seminal body of literature formed at the intersection of international relations and international human rights law, which offers invaluable insights into the socialization mechanisms and processes that states are motivated to comply with human rights norms and institutions. The mechanics identified by the so-called ‘first-generation’ of this socialization literature which is capable of inducing changes in domestic law, policy, and practices in the field of human rights include coercion and persuasion. Coercion concerns the process via which international institutions and foreign states force target states to obey international norms by using material sanctions and rewards. It is premised on the notion that nation states respond to military and financial incentives and costs by making rational calculations about the consequences of their behavior. Examples of coercion include the international community’s imposition of military sanctions on and offer of financial benefits to target countries in exchange for the latter’s compliance with international human rights norms. Persuasion, in contrast, focuses on a process during which the target state assesses, ‘internalizes’ and genuinely accepts the validity and legitimacy of international human rights norms. While the former emphasizes on material force and interests, the latter focuses on constructive identities and shared ideas.","PeriodicalId":348391,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Capital Punishment","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133945197","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.4337/9781786433251.00024
E. Girling
{"title":"Regional institutions and death penalty abolition: comparative perspectives and their discontents","authors":"E. Girling","doi":"10.4337/9781786433251.00024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786433251.00024","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":348391,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Capital Punishment","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127180019","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.4337/9781786433251.00030
Andrew Novak
{"title":"After abolition: the empirical, jurisprudential and strategic legacy of transnational death penalty litigation","authors":"Andrew Novak","doi":"10.4337/9781786433251.00030","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786433251.00030","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":348391,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Capital Punishment","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133966053","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.4337/9781786433251.00015
Daniel Pascoe
{"title":"Towards a global theory of capital clemency incidence","authors":"Daniel Pascoe","doi":"10.4337/9781786433251.00015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786433251.00015","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":348391,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Capital Punishment","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123217194","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：