Pamela Del Carmen Londoño-Cadena, Lina María Ibáñez-Correa, Windy Yirleza Valencia-Rivas, María Yubely Anacona-Cruz, Rayan El Barkachi Abou-Trabi, Robinson Pacheco-López
Objectives: To describe the frequency and factors associated with non-adherence to prenatal follow-up in pregnant women 35 years of age or older in the department of Cauca, Colombia, between 2016 and 2018.
Materials and methods: Cross-sectional, descriptive observational study of records of pregnant women between 35 and 41 years of age affiliated to the Cauca Indigenous Association Health Benefit Plan Management Organization-I (EAPB AIC-I) and registered in the prenatal care program, between 2016 and 2018. Duplicate records and records with incomplete information were excluded. Sociodemographic and clinical variables, as well as program outcomes, were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Odds ratios and their confidence intervals were calculated.
Results: In 1016 patients between 35 and 41 years of age, a frequency of 61.3 % of non-adherence to at least six prenatal visits was found. History of abortion (adjusted OR: 0.46; 95 % CI 0.33-0.64) and pregnancy of five or more (adjusted OR: 3,22; IC 95 % 1,50-6,91) were the associated factors.
Conclusions: Non-adherence to prenatal care by pregnant women of 35 years or more affiliated to the Cauca EAPB AIC-I is high. Further qualitative studies are needed to examine the cultural and social factors present in these communities that may affect adherence to prenatal monitoring, together with prospective studies to confirm the exploratory analysis of factors associated with non adherence. Insurance organizations in the subsidized regime should be called upon to conduct promotion activities in these communities in order to improve adherence.
目的:描述2016年至2018年期间哥伦比亚考卡省35岁及以上孕妇未遵守产前随访的频率和相关因素。材料和方法:对2016年至2018年在考卡原住民协会健康福利计划管理组织- i (EAPB AIC-I)注册并在产前护理计划中登记的35至41岁孕妇的记录进行横断面描述性观察研究。排除重复记录和信息不完整的记录。社会人口学和临床变量,以及项目结果,使用描述性统计进行分析。计算比值比及其置信区间。结果:在1016例年龄在35 ~ 41岁之间的患者中,61.3%的患者不遵守至少6次产前检查。流产史(调整OR: 0.46;95% CI 0.33-0.64)和5个或更多的妊娠(调整or: 3,22;ic95 %(1,50-6,91)为相关因素。结论:35岁及以上考卡EAPB aic - 1组孕妇不遵守产前护理的情况较高。需要进一步的定性研究来检查这些社区中存在的可能影响产前监测依从性的文化和社会因素,以及前瞻性研究来确认与不依从性相关的因素的探索性分析。应要求补贴制度下的保险组织在这些社区开展促进活动,以提高遵守制度的程度。
{"title":"Frequency and associated factors of non-adherence to prenatal care in pregnant women 35 years of age or older in Cauca, Colombia, 2016-2018","authors":"Pamela Del Carmen Londoño-Cadena, Lina María Ibáñez-Correa, Windy Yirleza Valencia-Rivas, María Yubely Anacona-Cruz, Rayan El Barkachi Abou-Trabi, Robinson Pacheco-López","doi":"10.18597/rcog.3833","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.3833","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe the frequency and factors associated with non-adherence to prenatal follow-up in pregnant women 35 years of age or older in the department of Cauca, Colombia, between 2016 and 2018.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Cross-sectional, descriptive observational study of records of pregnant women between 35 and 41 years of age affiliated to the Cauca Indigenous Association Health Benefit Plan Management Organization-I (EAPB AIC-I) and registered in the prenatal care program, between 2016 and 2018. Duplicate records and records with incomplete information were excluded. Sociodemographic and clinical variables, as well as program outcomes, were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Odds ratios and their confidence intervals were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 1016 patients between 35 and 41 years of age, a frequency of 61.3 % of non-adherence to at least six prenatal visits was found. History of abortion (adjusted OR: 0.46; 95 % CI 0.33-0.64) and pregnancy of five or more (adjusted OR: 3,22; IC 95 % 1,50-6,91) were the associated factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Non-adherence to prenatal care by pregnant women of 35 years or more affiliated to the Cauca EAPB AIC-I is high. Further qualitative studies are needed to examine the cultural and social factors present in these communities that may affect adherence to prenatal monitoring, together with prospective studies to confirm the exploratory analysis of factors associated with non adherence. Insurance organizations in the subsidized regime should be called upon to conduct promotion activities in these communities in order to improve adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":35675,"journal":{"name":"Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecologia","volume":"73 3","pages":"255-264"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/64/3e/2463-0225-rcog-73-03-3833.PMC9674382.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10343510","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Carmen Doris Garzón-Olivares, Carlos Fernando Grillo-Ardila, Jairo Amaya-Guio, Maria Teresa Vallejo-Ortega, Luz Amparo Diaz-Cruz, Carolina Fernández-Motta, Alejandra Del Pilar Gomez-Motta, Alina Tatiana Barrera, Lina María Trujillo-Sánchez, Carlos Humberto Pérez-Moreno, Luis Jairo Bonilla-Osma, Robinson Fernández-Mercado, Néstor Augusto Giraldo-Méndez, Jorge Eduardo Caro-Caro, Amparo Leonor Ramírez-Corredor, Dayanne Milecsy Rodríguez-Hernádez
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary screening with Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) testing was introduced in Colombia in 2014 for individuals between 30 and 65 years of age. When the result is positive, cytology triage is performed for colposcopy referral. The convenience of initiating HPV-DNA testing for screening at 25 years of age is currently a subject of discussion. Therefore, the objective of this health technology assessment (HTA) is to analyze the available evidence regarding safety, efficacy, cost-effectiveness, values and preferences, ethical dilemmas and considerations pertaining to the implementation of the HPV-DNA test as a cervical screening strategy in women under 30 years of age in the Colombian context.</p><p><strong>Domains to be assessed: </strong>Clinical efficacy and safety 1. Cumulative rate of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 or high-er after 2 screening rounds. 2. Cumulative rates of invasive cancer of the uterine cervix after 2 screening rounds. 3. Safety: referral to colposcopy. Cost-effectiveness Cost-effectiveness for Colombia. Other domains considered Ethical considerations associated with cervical screening in women under 30 years of age. Organizational and individual considerations. Barriers and facilitators pertaining to the implementation of cervical screening in women under 30 years of age in the Colombian context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical efficacy and safety assessment A systematic literature search of systematic reviews and clinical trials was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL. The body of evidence was rated using the GRADE approach. An interdisciplinary team was then convened to create a working group to review the retrieved evidence. This led to the discussion and construction of the conclusions following the guidelines of a formal consensus in accordance with the RAND/UCLA methodology. Economic study Systematic literature research of studies that had assessed cost-effectiveness for Colombia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinical outcomes An integrative analysis of 5 randomized clinical trials that met the inclusion critera was performed. Compared with cytology, primary HPV-DNA testing in women under 30 years of age could be associated with a lower frequency of CIN+2 lesions during the first screening round (RR: 1.57; CI: 1.20 to 2.04; low evidence certainty), and a lower incidence of CIN+2 (RR: 0.67; CI: 0.48 to 0.92; low evidence certainty). Moreover, it is associated with a lower frequency of invasive carcinoma at the end of follow-up (RR: 0.19; CI: 0.07 to 0.53; high evidence certainty). Economic results From the financial point of view, the use of HPVDNA testing plus cytology-based triage starting at 25 years of age is perhaps the most cost-effective option for Colombia (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, COP 8,820,980 in 2013). Other implications Two studies suggest that barriers to implementation attributable to intermediation, public unrest and geograp
{"title":"Primary HPV-DNA screening in women under 30 years of age: health technology assessment","authors":"Carmen Doris Garzón-Olivares, Carlos Fernando Grillo-Ardila, Jairo Amaya-Guio, Maria Teresa Vallejo-Ortega, Luz Amparo Diaz-Cruz, Carolina Fernández-Motta, Alejandra Del Pilar Gomez-Motta, Alina Tatiana Barrera, Lina María Trujillo-Sánchez, Carlos Humberto Pérez-Moreno, Luis Jairo Bonilla-Osma, Robinson Fernández-Mercado, Néstor Augusto Giraldo-Méndez, Jorge Eduardo Caro-Caro, Amparo Leonor Ramírez-Corredor, Dayanne Milecsy Rodríguez-Hernádez","doi":"10.18597/rcog.3866","DOIUrl":"10.18597/rcog.3866","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary screening with Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) testing was introduced in Colombia in 2014 for individuals between 30 and 65 years of age. When the result is positive, cytology triage is performed for colposcopy referral. The convenience of initiating HPV-DNA testing for screening at 25 years of age is currently a subject of discussion. Therefore, the objective of this health technology assessment (HTA) is to analyze the available evidence regarding safety, efficacy, cost-effectiveness, values and preferences, ethical dilemmas and considerations pertaining to the implementation of the HPV-DNA test as a cervical screening strategy in women under 30 years of age in the Colombian context.</p><p><strong>Domains to be assessed: </strong>Clinical efficacy and safety\u00001. Cumulative rate of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 or high-er after 2 screening rounds.\u00002. Cumulative rates of invasive cancer of the uterine cervix after 2 screening rounds.\u00003. Safety: referral to colposcopy.\u0000\u0000Cost-effectiveness\u0000Cost-effectiveness for Colombia.\u0000\u0000Other domains considered\u0000Ethical considerations associated with cervical screening in women under 30 years of age. Organizational and individual considerations. Barriers and facilitators pertaining to the implementation of cervical screening in women under 30 years of age in the Colombian context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical efficacy and safety assessment\u0000A systematic literature search of systematic reviews and clinical trials was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL. The body of evidence was rated using the GRADE approach. An interdisciplinary team was then convened to create a working group to review the retrieved evidence. This led to the discussion and construction of the conclusions following the guidelines of a formal consensus in accordance with the RAND/UCLA methodology.\u0000\u0000Economic study\u0000Systematic literature research of studies that had assessed cost-effectiveness for Colombia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinical outcomes\u0000An integrative analysis of 5 randomized clinical trials that met the inclusion critera was performed. Compared with cytology, primary HPV-DNA testing in women under 30 years of age could be associated with a lower frequency of CIN+2 lesions during the first screening round (RR: 1.57; CI: 1.20 to 2.04; low evidence certainty), and a lower incidence of CIN+2 (RR: 0.67; CI: 0.48 to 0.92; low evidence certainty). Moreover, it is associated with a lower frequency of invasive carcinoma at the end of follow-up (RR: 0.19; CI: 0.07 to 0.53; high evidence certainty).\u0000\u0000Economic results\u0000From the financial point of view, the use of HPVDNA testing plus cytology-based triage starting at 25 years of age is perhaps the most cost-effective option for Colombia (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, COP 8,820,980 in 2013).\u0000\u0000Other implications\u0000Two studies suggest that barriers to implementation attributable to intermediation, public unrest and geograp","PeriodicalId":35675,"journal":{"name":"Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecologia","volume":"73 2","pages":"203-222"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2b/32/2463-0225-rcog-73-02-3866.PMC9395198.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9349216","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Silvia Lucía Gaviria-Arbeláez, Alina Uribe-Holguín, Liana Sirley Gil-Castaño, Silvia Elena Uribe-Bravo, Luz Elena Serna-Galeano, Carolina Álvarez-Mesa, Robinson Palacio-Moná, Sandra María Vélez-Cuervo
Objectives: To describe the prevalence of symptoms of depression and worry affecting pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Material and methods: Descriptive crosssectional study that included pregnant women with access to a technological device (mobile phone, computer or tablet) and Internet connection, living in Antioquia, Colombia. Women with literary and technological illiteracy were excluded. An online survey was conducted to gather information about sociodemographic and baseline clinical conditions and the main concerns caused by the pandemic. Additionally, the Edinburg Depression Scale (EPDS) was applied in order to measure the risk of depression. The Jamovi software was used for data processing and statistical analysis.
Results: Overall, 345 pregnant women between 15 and 44 years of age were surveyed, with the finding of a 30.4 % prevalence of the risk of depression. Domestic violence and absence of a support network were identified in 4.9 % and 8.4 % of cases. The major sources of worry were the fear of being separated from their babies on the day of birth, the possibility of having to be alone during childbirth, and the fear of contagion due to potential effects on the fetus or the newborn.
Conclusions: Depression symptoms have been frequent among pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic. It is important to inquire about stress factors and depression symptoms during prenatal visits, childbirth and the postpartum period. Additional local studies are needed to assess other mental health disorders that may have increased during the COVID-19 pandemic.
{"title":"Prevalence of the risk of depression and worry in pregnant women in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic in Antioquia, Colombia, 2020-2021","authors":"Silvia Lucía Gaviria-Arbeláez, Alina Uribe-Holguín, Liana Sirley Gil-Castaño, Silvia Elena Uribe-Bravo, Luz Elena Serna-Galeano, Carolina Álvarez-Mesa, Robinson Palacio-Moná, Sandra María Vélez-Cuervo","doi":"10.18597/rcog.3821","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.3821","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe the prevalence of symptoms of depression and worry affecting pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Descriptive crosssectional study that included pregnant women with access to a technological device (mobile phone, computer or tablet) and Internet connection, living in Antioquia, Colombia. Women with literary and technological illiteracy were excluded. An online survey was conducted to gather information about sociodemographic and baseline clinical conditions and the main concerns caused by the pandemic. Additionally, the Edinburg Depression Scale (EPDS) was applied in order to measure the risk of depression. The Jamovi software was used for data processing and statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 345 pregnant women between 15 and 44 years of age were surveyed, with the finding of a 30.4 % prevalence of the risk of depression. Domestic violence and absence of a support network were identified in 4.9 % and 8.4 % of cases. The major sources of worry were the fear of being separated from their babies on the day of birth, the possibility of having to be alone during childbirth, and the fear of contagion due to potential effects on the fetus or the newborn.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Depression symptoms have been frequent among pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic. It is important to inquire about stress factors and depression symptoms during prenatal visits, childbirth and the postpartum period. Additional local studies are needed to assess other mental health disorders that may have increased during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":35675,"journal":{"name":"Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecologia","volume":" ","pages":"194-202"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/bf/10/2463-0225-rcog-73-02-3821.PMC9395201.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40702448","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alma Iris Zúniga-Briceño, Luz Enid Erazo-Fino, Claudia Carolina Burgos-Zúniga
Objectives: To describe maternal and perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with confirmed COVID-19 infection in a hospital in Comayagua, Honduras.
Material and methods: Descriptive case series study that included symptomatic pregnant women who came or were referred between March 1, 2020 and March 31, 2021 to a public referral institution, with PCR-confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 infection. Sociodemographic, obstetric considerations, infection severity, length of hospital stay, and maternal and perinatal complications were the measured variables. The frequency of COVID-19 infection and the maternal and perinatal outcomes of these gestations were estimated. A descriptive analysis was performed.
Results: A total of 2258 pregnant women were seen during the study period. Of them, 23 who met the selection criteria were included, for a frequency of COVID-19 infection of 1.01 %. The study population characteristically consisted of young women living in common-law marriage. Thirteen patients were managed as outpatients because of a mild clinical condition, and 10 were hospitalized. The pregnant women managed as outpatients were delivered by cesarean section (76.9 %) due to dissatisfactory fetal status at a gestational age of 37 weeks or more, with 3 pre-term delivery cases (36 weeks) documented. Of the hospitalized patients, one had a miscarriage and nine were delivered due to an obstetric indication. There was one case of premature birth, and one maternal (4 %) and one neonatal death were documented.
Conclusions: During the study period, 1% of the pregnant women had COVID-19 infection at the Santa Teresa Hospital in Comayagua. Further studies analyzing the maternal and perinatal impact of COVID-19 infection in the Central American region are required.
{"title":"Maternal and perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with confirmed COVID-19 infection, Santa Teresa Hospital, Comayagua, Honduras. Case series","authors":"Alma Iris Zúniga-Briceño, Luz Enid Erazo-Fino, Claudia Carolina Burgos-Zúniga","doi":"10.18597/rcog.3762","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.3762","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe maternal and perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with confirmed COVID-19 infection in a hospital in Comayagua, Honduras.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Descriptive case series study that included symptomatic pregnant women who came or were referred between March 1, 2020 and March 31, 2021 to a public referral institution, with PCR-confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 infection. Sociodemographic, obstetric considerations, infection severity, length of hospital stay, and maternal and perinatal complications were the measured variables. The frequency of COVID-19 infection and the maternal and perinatal outcomes of these gestations were estimated. A descriptive analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2258 pregnant women were seen during the study period. Of them, 23 who met the selection criteria were included, for a frequency of COVID-19 infection of 1.01 %. The study population characteristically consisted of young women living in common-law marriage. Thirteen patients were managed as outpatients because of a mild clinical condition, and 10 were hospitalized. The pregnant women managed as outpatients were delivered by cesarean section (76.9 %) due to dissatisfactory fetal status at a gestational age of 37 weeks or more, with 3 pre-term delivery cases (36 weeks) documented. Of the hospitalized patients, one had a miscarriage and nine were delivered due to an obstetric indication. There was one case of premature birth, and one maternal (4 %) and one neonatal death were documented.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>During the study period, 1% of the pregnant women had COVID-19 infection at the Santa Teresa Hospital in Comayagua. Further studies analyzing the maternal and perinatal impact of COVID-19 infection in the Central American region are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":35675,"journal":{"name":"Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecologia","volume":" ","pages":"175-183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/90/bb/2463-0225-rcog-73-02-3762.PMC9395197.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40702449","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Carlos Fernando Grillo-Ardila, Hernando Gaitán-Duarte, Jorge Andrés Rubio-Romero
{"title":"The Colombian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and its new “Video Articles” section","authors":"Carlos Fernando Grillo-Ardila, Hernando Gaitán-Duarte, Jorge Andrés Rubio-Romero","doi":"10.18597/rcog.3911","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.3911","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":35675,"journal":{"name":"Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecologia","volume":" ","pages":"169-174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/89/55/2463-0225-rcog-73-02-3911.PMC9395200.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40679186","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Andrés Felipe Bocanegra-Ballesteros, Angélica María Cuello-Salcedo, Juan Diego Villegas-Echeverri, Jorge Darío López-Isano, José Duván López-Jaramillo
{"title":"Discoid resection for the management of patients with deep intestinal endometriosis","authors":"Andrés Felipe Bocanegra-Ballesteros, Angélica María Cuello-Salcedo, Juan Diego Villegas-Echeverri, Jorge Darío López-Isano, José Duván López-Jaramillo","doi":"10.18597/rcog.3912","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.3912","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":35675,"journal":{"name":"Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecologia","volume":" ","pages":"225-226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e7/3c/2463-0225-rcog-73-02-3912.PMC9395195.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40679185","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Oscar Octalivar Gutiérrez-Montufar, Oscar Enrique Ordoñez-Mosquera, Mónica Alejandra Rodríguez-Gamboa, Javier Andrés Castro-Zúñiga, Jhon Edison Ijaj-Piamba, Roberth Alirio Ortiz-Martínez
Objectives: To determine the predictive performance of fetal growth restriction by Maternal Fetal Medicine Society (MFMS) definition of ultrasound, the Delphi consensus (DC) and the Barcelona Fetal Medicine (BFM) criteria for adverse perinatal outcomes, and to identify whether there is an association between the diagnosis of fetal growth restriction (FGR) and adverse perinatal outcomes.
Material and methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted including women with singleton pregnancies between 24 and 36 weeks of gestation seen at the maternal fetal medicine unit for ultrasound assessment of fetal growth and delivery care in a public referral hospital in Popayán, Colombia. Pregnancies with ultrasound findings of congenital abnormalities were excluded. Convenience sampling was used. Sociodemographic and clinical variables were measured on admission; additional variables were gestational age, FGR diagnosis and adverse composite perinatal outcome. The predictive ability of three fetal growth restriction diagnostic criteria for poor perinatal outcomes was analyzed and asociation between FGR and adverse perinatlal outcomes.
Results: Overall, 228 pregnant women with a mean age of 26.8 years were included; FGR prevalence according to the three criteria was 3.95 %, 16.6 % and 21.9 % for DC, BFM and MFMS, respectively. None of the criteria resulted in an acceptable area under the curve for the prediction of the composite adverse neonatal outcome; FGR diagnosis by DC and MFMS were associated with adverse perinatal outcomes with a RR of 2.6 (95 % CI: 1.5-4.3) and 1.57 (95 % CI: 1.01-2.44) respectively. No association was found for BFM RR: 1.32 (95 % CI: 0.8-2.1).
Conclusions: Given a positive result for FGR, the Delphi method is significantly associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. The proportion of false negative results for a poor perinatal outcome is high for the three methods. Prospective studies that reduce measurement and attrition bias are required.
{"title":"Predictive performance of fetal growth restriction criteria for adverse perinatal outcomes in a hospital in Popayán, Colombia","authors":"Oscar Octalivar Gutiérrez-Montufar, Oscar Enrique Ordoñez-Mosquera, Mónica Alejandra Rodríguez-Gamboa, Javier Andrés Castro-Zúñiga, Jhon Edison Ijaj-Piamba, Roberth Alirio Ortiz-Martínez","doi":"10.18597/rcog.3840","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.3840","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the predictive performance of fetal growth restriction by Maternal Fetal Medicine Society (MFMS) definition of ultrasound, the Delphi consensus (DC) and the Barcelona Fetal Medicine (BFM) criteria for adverse perinatal outcomes, and to identify whether there is an association between the diagnosis of fetal growth restriction (FGR) and adverse perinatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted including women with singleton pregnancies between 24 and 36 weeks of gestation seen at the maternal fetal medicine unit for ultrasound assessment of fetal growth and delivery care in a public referral hospital in Popayán, Colombia. Pregnancies with ultrasound findings of congenital abnormalities were excluded. Convenience sampling was used. Sociodemographic and clinical variables were measured on admission; additional variables were gestational age, FGR diagnosis and adverse composite perinatal outcome. The predictive ability of three fetal growth restriction diagnostic criteria for poor perinatal outcomes was analyzed and asociation between FGR and adverse perinatlal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 228 pregnant women with a mean age of 26.8 years were included; FGR prevalence according to the three criteria was 3.95 %, 16.6 % and 21.9 % for DC, BFM and MFMS, respectively. None of the criteria resulted in an acceptable area under the curve for the prediction of the composite adverse neonatal outcome; FGR diagnosis by DC and MFMS were associated with adverse perinatal outcomes with a RR of 2.6 (95 % CI: 1.5-4.3) and 1.57 (95 % CI: 1.01-2.44) respectively. No association was found for BFM RR: 1.32 (95 % CI: 0.8-2.1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given a positive result for FGR, the Delphi method is significantly associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. The proportion of false negative results for a poor perinatal outcome is high for the three methods. Prospective studies that reduce measurement and attrition bias are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":35675,"journal":{"name":"Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecologia","volume":" ","pages":"184-193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1a/d6/2463-0225-rcog-73-02-3840.PMC9395196.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40702447","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Omar Yanque-Robles, Naysha Becerra-Chauca, Wendy Nieto-Gutiérrez, Raúl Alegría Guerrero, Marco Uriarte-Morales, Wilmer Valencia-Vargas, Jorge Arroyo-Campuzano, Lourdes Sheillah Torres-Peña, Rita Ada Meza-Padilla, Carmen Meza-Luis, Stefany Salvador-Salvador, Lourdes Carrera-Acosta
Objectives: To provide clinical recommendations based on evidence for the the prevention and management of HDP in EsSalud. Methods: A CPG for the the prevention and management of HDP in EsSalud was developed. To this end, a guideline development group (local GDG) was established, including medical specialists and methodologists. The local GDG formulated 8 clinical questions to be answered by this CPG. Systematic searches of systematic reviews and—when it was considered pertinent—primary studies were searched in PubMed y Central during 2021. The evidence to answer each of the posed clinical questions was selected. The quality of the evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. In periodic work meetings, the local GDG used the GRADE methodology to review the evidence and formulate the recommendations, the points of good clinical practice and flowcharts for the prevention, management and follow-up. Finally, the CPG was approved with Resolution 112-IETSI-ESSALUD-2021. Results: This CPG addressed 8 clinical questions, divided into three topics: prevention, management and follow-up of the HDP. Based on these questions, 11 recommendations (6 strong recommendations and 5 weak recommendations), 32 points of good clinical practice, and 3 flowcharts were formulated. Conclusions: The main recommendations in the guideline are the use of magnesium sulfate for the treatment of severe pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. The guideline must be updated in three years’ time.
目的:为新疆地区HDP的预防和管理提供基于证据的临床建议。方法:建立高血压病预防与管理CPG。为此目的,成立了一个指南制定小组(地方GDG),包括医学专家和方法学家。当地GDG制定了8个临床问题由该CPG回答。在2021年期间,在PubMed y Central检索了系统评价和(当认为有针对性时)主要研究的系统检索。选择证据来回答每个提出的临床问题。证据的质量采用分级推荐评估、发展和评价(GRADE)方法进行评价。在定期的工作会议上,本地总督局采用GRADE方法审查证据,并制定预防、管理和跟进的建议、良好临床做法要点和流程图。最后,CPG以第112-IETSI-ESSALUD-2021号决议获得批准。结果:本CPG涉及8个临床问题,分为三个主题:HDP的预防、管理和随访。根据这些问题,制定了11条建议(6条强建议,5条弱建议),32条临床良好规范,3个流程图。结论:指南中主要推荐使用硫酸镁治疗重度先兆子痫和子痫。该指南必须在三年内更新。
{"title":"Clinical practice guideline for the prevention and management of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy","authors":"Omar Yanque-Robles, Naysha Becerra-Chauca, Wendy Nieto-Gutiérrez, Raúl Alegría Guerrero, Marco Uriarte-Morales, Wilmer Valencia-Vargas, Jorge Arroyo-Campuzano, Lourdes Sheillah Torres-Peña, Rita Ada Meza-Padilla, Carmen Meza-Luis, Stefany Salvador-Salvador, Lourdes Carrera-Acosta","doi":"10.18597/rcog.3810","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.3810","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objectives: To provide clinical recommendations based on evidence for the the prevention and management of HDP in EsSalud.\u0000\u0000Methods: A CPG for the the prevention and management of HDP in EsSalud was developed. To this end, a guideline development group (local GDG) was established, including medical specialists and methodologists. The local GDG formulated 8 clinical questions to be answered by this CPG. Systematic searches of systematic reviews and—when it was considered pertinent—primary studies were searched in PubMed y Central during 2021. The evidence to answer each of the posed clinical questions was selected. The quality of the evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. In periodic work meetings, the local GDG used the GRADE methodology to review the evidence and formulate the recommendations, the points of good clinical practice and flowcharts for the prevention, management and follow-up. Finally, the CPG was approved with Resolution 112-IETSI-ESSALUD-2021.\u0000\u0000Results: This CPG addressed 8 clinical questions, divided into three topics: prevention, management and follow-up of the HDP. Based on these questions, 11 recommendations (6 strong recommendations and 5 weak recommendations), 32 points of good clinical practice, and 3 flowcharts were formulated.\u0000\u0000Conclusions: The main recommendations in the guideline are the use of magnesium sulfate for the treatment of severe pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. The guideline must be updated in three years’ time.</p>","PeriodicalId":35675,"journal":{"name":"Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecologia","volume":"73 1","pages":"48-141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1b/d5/2463-0225-rcog-73-01-3810.PMC9067603.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10303481","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Edgar Fernando Cárdenas-Arias, Diana Elizabeth Escudero-Cardona, Edgar Adel Noreña-Mosquera
Objectives: To characterize a cohort of women with voluntary interruption of pregnancy (VIP) and to describe intraoperative complications according to the technique used. Materials and Methods: Descriptive study in a historical cohort of women undergoing VIP in two healthcare institutions in Medellín, Colombia, in 2019. Women with pelvic infection and STIs were excluded. Consecutive sampling was used. Sociodemographic, sexual and reproductive health, clinical characteristics of the pregnancy, legal cause of the VIP, characteristics of the care process and complications of the VIP techniques up to post-procedural day 7 were the measured variables. A descriptive analysis was carried out. Results: Overall, 1,520 women were identified as eligible during the study period. Of them, 46 were intervened in other institutions, leaving 1,474 candidates to enter the study. Of them, 30 were excluded because of pelvic or sexually transmitted infections. Ultimately, 1,444 pregnant women were included in the analysis. Risk to the mother’s health was the most frequent legal cause in 94.3% of cases. Ninety-nine percent of women received pre-procedural counseling, and 78.4% agreed to use some form of contraception after VIP. Manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) was used in 95.6% of women and dilation and curettage (D&C) in 4.4%. Complications up to postoperative day 7 occurred in 17.56%, and there were no complications in the MVA group; 80% of women attended the follow-up visit on post-VIP day 7. Conclusions: MVA is a safe procedure which was not associated with complications within the first seven post-VIP days in the studied patients. Prospective studies to assess the safety and cost of the different VIP options are required.
{"title":"Safety of voluntary interruption of pregnancy (VIP) in two healthcare institutions in Medellín, Colombia, in 2019. Historical cohort","authors":"Edgar Fernando Cárdenas-Arias, Diana Elizabeth Escudero-Cardona, Edgar Adel Noreña-Mosquera","doi":"10.18597/rcog.3760","DOIUrl":"10.18597/rcog.3760","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objectives: To characterize a cohort of women with voluntary interruption of pregnancy (VIP) and to describe intraoperative complications according to the technique used.\u0000\u0000Materials and Methods: Descriptive study in a historical cohort of women undergoing VIP in two healthcare institutions in Medellín, Colombia, in 2019. Women with pelvic infection and STIs were excluded. Consecutive sampling was used. Sociodemographic, sexual and reproductive health, clinical characteristics of the pregnancy, legal cause of the VIP, characteristics of the care process and complications of the VIP techniques up to post-procedural day 7 were the measured variables. A descriptive analysis was carried out.\u0000\u0000Results: Overall, 1,520 women were identified as eligible during the study period. Of them, 46 were intervened in other institutions, leaving 1,474 candidates to enter the study. Of them, 30 were excluded because of pelvic or sexually transmitted infections. Ultimately, 1,444 pregnant women were included in the analysis. Risk to the mother’s health was the most frequent legal cause in 94.3% of cases. Ninety-nine percent of women received pre-procedural counseling, and 78.4% agreed to use some form of contraception after VIP. Manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) was used in 95.6% of women and dilation and curettage (D&C) in 4.4%. Complications up to postoperative day 7 occurred in 17.56%, and there were no complications in the MVA group; 80% of women attended the follow-up visit on post-VIP day 7.\u0000\u0000Conclusions: MVA is a safe procedure which was not associated with complications within the first seven post-VIP days in the studied patients. Prospective studies to assess the safety and cost of the different VIP options are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":35675,"journal":{"name":"Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecologia","volume":"73 1","pages":"39-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9084360/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47499053","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}