{"title":"Real Estate Development Matrix","authors":"R. Harris","doi":"10.1201/9781315180779","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315180779","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":35888,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Real Estate Literature","volume":"123 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88557953","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-05-01DOI: 10.1080/10835547.2018.12090486
S. Azasu, Robert A. Simons
Abstract The real estate academy has always prioritized with the quality of research and research contribution. We conducted an online survey of journal editors and associate editors in real estate...
{"title":"What Constitutes a Research Contribution in Real Estate Related Fields? A Survey of Journal Editors","authors":"S. Azasu, Robert A. Simons","doi":"10.1080/10835547.2018.12090486","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.2018.12090486","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The real estate academy has always prioritized with the quality of research and research contribution. We conducted an online survey of journal editors and associate editors in real estate...","PeriodicalId":35888,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Real Estate Literature","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81489542","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-01-17DOI: 10.5555/0927-7544.25.2.409
C. André, N. Antonakakis, Rangan Gupta, M. Zerihun
Abstract In this article, we investigate asymmetry in nominal and real housing price series from eleven emerging and twenty advanced economies using the nonparametric Triples test (Randles et al., 1980), which allows identification of different types of asymmetries in economic cycles. We find asymmetry in fewer emerging than advanced economies. In more than half of the latter, nominal prices reach peaks faster than troughs (positive steepness asymmetry), suggesting the presence of downward nominal rigidities. Nominal price asymmetry is found only in slightly over a quarter of the emerging economies. Hence, nominal housing price increases are more likely to be followed by symmetric price falls in emerging than in advanced countries. Regarding real housing prices, peaks are higher than troughs (positive deepness asymmetry) in half of the advanced economies, suggesting the presence of price overshooting during booms, but less undershooting during busts. Weaker evidence of similar asymmetry is found in emergi...
在本文中,我们使用非参数三元组检验(Randles et al., 1980)研究了来自11个新兴经济体和20个发达经济体的名义和实际房价序列的不对称性,该检验允许识别经济周期中不同类型的不对称性。我们发现,新兴经济体的不对称性少于发达经济体。在后者的一半以上,名义价格达到峰值的速度比达到低谷的速度要快(正陡度不对称),这表明存在下行的名义刚性。名义价格不对称只出现在四分之一多一点的新兴经济体中。因此,与发达国家相比,新兴国家的名义房价上涨之后,更有可能出现对称的价格下跌。就实际房价而言,半数发达经济体的峰值高于低谷(正深度不对称),这表明在繁荣时期价格过高,但在萧条时期价格过低的情况较少。类似不对称的证据较弱,在emergi…
{"title":"Asymmetric Behavior in Nominal and Real Housing Prices: Evidence from Emerging and Advanced Economies","authors":"C. André, N. Antonakakis, Rangan Gupta, M. Zerihun","doi":"10.5555/0927-7544.25.2.409","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5555/0927-7544.25.2.409","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this article, we investigate asymmetry in nominal and real housing price series from eleven emerging and twenty advanced economies using the nonparametric Triples test (Randles et al., 1980), which allows identification of different types of asymmetries in economic cycles. We find asymmetry in fewer emerging than advanced economies. In more than half of the latter, nominal prices reach peaks faster than troughs (positive steepness asymmetry), suggesting the presence of downward nominal rigidities. Nominal price asymmetry is found only in slightly over a quarter of the emerging economies. Hence, nominal housing price increases are more likely to be followed by symmetric price falls in emerging than in advanced countries. Regarding real housing prices, peaks are higher than troughs (positive deepness asymmetry) in half of the advanced economies, suggesting the presence of price overshooting during booms, but less undershooting during busts. Weaker evidence of similar asymmetry is found in emergi...","PeriodicalId":35888,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Real Estate Literature","volume":"62 1","pages":"409-425"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88518284","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2017-08-03DOI: 10.1080/10835547.2017.12090445
A. Gupta, A. Sawhney, D. Bajaj, S. Agarwal
Private equity real estate (PERE) in developing markets has limited reliable publically available data. In this paper, we analyze the transaction data of PERE in India for the 2005–2015 period. Inv...
{"title":"Significance of Real Estate Fund Management in India","authors":"A. Gupta, A. Sawhney, D. Bajaj, S. Agarwal","doi":"10.1080/10835547.2017.12090445","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.2017.12090445","url":null,"abstract":"Private equity real estate (PERE) in developing markets has limited reliable publically available data. In this paper, we analyze the transaction data of PERE in India for the 2005–2015 period. Inv...","PeriodicalId":35888,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Real Estate Literature","volume":"27 1","pages":"141-168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84630460","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2017-01-01DOI: 10.1080/10835547.2017.12090454
Helen X.H. Bao,Charlotte Chunming Meng
{"title":"Loss Aversion and Housing Studies","authors":"Helen X.H. Bao,Charlotte Chunming Meng","doi":"10.1080/10835547.2017.12090454","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.2017.12090454","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":35888,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Real Estate Literature","volume":"35 1","pages":"49-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138527801","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2016-05-01DOI: 10.5555/0927-7544.24.2.403
M. Simonotti, M. Ciuna, F. Salvo, M. D. Ruggiero
(ProQuest: ... denotes formulae omitted.)The International Valuation Standards (IVS) are internationally recognized appraisal methods used in the market-oriented approach, the income approach, and the cost approach. When a real estate market is active and all necessary market data are available, the market comparison approach (MCA) is the most direct, probative, and documented method used to appraise real estate market values (Simonotti, 2006); in particular, the MCA is the most important method and is comparable to the market- oriented approach. The MCA is known by several different names in the appraisal literature. In some of the older literature it is called the market data approach, while elsewhere it is referred to as the grid adjustment technique.There are many appraisal procedures that can be used in the logic application of the MCA. These procedures are grouped into two categories: (1) quantitative techniques based on detection of objective markets data (paired data analysis, graphic analysis, trend analysis, secondary data analysis, adjustment grid method, etc.); and (2) qualitative techniques based on the analyst's subjective judgment (relative comparison analysis, personal interviews, etc.).In particular, the adjustment grid method (AGM) represents a link between the MCA and the multiple regression analysis, aiming to formalize the adjustment step of the MCA, without reaching the formal and symbolic perfection of the multiple regression models. There are three methods documented in the literature used in the application of the AGM (Colwell, 1983): The first is the additive dollar adjustment method (ADAM), which is based on the assumption that the selling price is a linear function of the property attributes. The second, is the additive percentage adjustments method (APaM), which may be rationalized by a number of functional forms. In general, the percentage difference in prices between a subject and a comparable is found by adding functions of the two properties' attributes. The third is the multiplicative percentage adjustment method (MPaM), in which it is supposed that the ratio of the selling price to that of the comparable is equal to the product of functions of the subject and the comparable's attributes.The evaluation of hedonic prices in applying AGMs can be done directly through paired data analysis and indirectly by acquiring hedonic prices obtained through the application of multiple regression analysis to a sufficiently large sample. There are situations in which both modes are not very applicable due to the lack of data suitable for the application of the paired analysis and the limited availability of sufficient data to the application of multiple regressions (Colwell, Cannaday, and Wu, 1983). Even when the data are available, a statistical analysis does not always lead to consistent results in terms of quantities because they achieved following generalizations that are not always able to take into account the specificiti
(ProQuest:……表示省略公式。)国际价值评估准则(IVS)是国际公认的评估方法,适用于市场导向法、收益法和成本法。当房地产市场活跃且所有必要的市场数据可用时,市场比较方法(MCA)是用于评估房地产市场价值的最直接,证明和记录的方法(Simonotti, 2006);特别是,MCA是最重要的方法,可与市场导向的方法相媲美。MCA在评估文献中有几个不同的名称。在一些较早的文献中,它被称为市场数据方法,而在其他地方,它被称为网格调整技术。在MCA的逻辑应用中,可以使用许多评估程序。这些程序分为两类:(1)基于客观市场数据检测的定量技术(配对数据分析、图形分析、趋势分析、二次数据分析、调整网格法等);(2)基于分析师主观判断的定性技术(相对比较分析、个人访谈等)。其中,平差网格法(AGM)代表了MCA与多元回归分析之间的联系,旨在形式化MCA的平差步骤,而不达到多元回归模型的形式化和符号化的完善。在应用AGM的文献中记载了三种方法(Colwell, 1983):第一种是加性美元调整方法(ADAM),它基于销售价格是财产属性的线性函数的假设。第二种是加性百分比调整法(APaM),它可以通过一些功能形式加以合理化。一般来说,通过添加两个属性的属性函数,可以找到主题和可比商品之间价格的百分比差异。第三种是乘法百分比调整法(MPaM),该方法假定销售价格与可比价格的比率等于主体函数与可比属性的乘积。应用agm对享乐价格的评价可以直接通过配对数据分析来完成,也可以通过对足够大的样本应用多元回归分析获得享乐价格来间接完成。在某些情况下,由于缺乏适合应用配对分析的数据,以及应用多元回归的足够数据有限,这两种模式都不太适用(Colwell, Cannaday, and Wu, 1983)。即使当数据可用时,统计分析也并不总是在数量方面得出一致的结果,因为它们所获得的概括并不总是能够考虑到每个属性的特殊性。为了克服这些缺点,一些作者提供了一种除了ADAM、APaM和MPAM之外的方法,其中享乐价格必须通过应用估值标准(市场价值、成本价值、转换价值、互补价值、重置价值)产生的公式来计算,旨在通过既定公式间接计算享乐价格(simontti, 1997)。这些数学公式的应用解决了客观评估房地产数量特征的享乐价格的问题,尽管有些限制可归因于:(1)公式中存在重复,可能导致高估或低估;(2)属性特征之间的相似程度;(三)可比价格的可靠性。如果存在与核对过程中的相似性和可靠性有关的异常情况,则需要采用能够衡量可比样品特征的不相似性及其买卖价格的异常情况的分析标准。…
{"title":"Measurements of Rationality for a Scientific Approach to the Market- Oriented Methods","authors":"M. Simonotti, M. Ciuna, F. Salvo, M. D. Ruggiero","doi":"10.5555/0927-7544.24.2.403","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5555/0927-7544.24.2.403","url":null,"abstract":"(ProQuest: ... denotes formulae omitted.)The International Valuation Standards (IVS) are internationally recognized appraisal methods used in the market-oriented approach, the income approach, and the cost approach. When a real estate market is active and all necessary market data are available, the market comparison approach (MCA) is the most direct, probative, and documented method used to appraise real estate market values (Simonotti, 2006); in particular, the MCA is the most important method and is comparable to the market- oriented approach. The MCA is known by several different names in the appraisal literature. In some of the older literature it is called the market data approach, while elsewhere it is referred to as the grid adjustment technique.There are many appraisal procedures that can be used in the logic application of the MCA. These procedures are grouped into two categories: (1) quantitative techniques based on detection of objective markets data (paired data analysis, graphic analysis, trend analysis, secondary data analysis, adjustment grid method, etc.); and (2) qualitative techniques based on the analyst's subjective judgment (relative comparison analysis, personal interviews, etc.).In particular, the adjustment grid method (AGM) represents a link between the MCA and the multiple regression analysis, aiming to formalize the adjustment step of the MCA, without reaching the formal and symbolic perfection of the multiple regression models. There are three methods documented in the literature used in the application of the AGM (Colwell, 1983): The first is the additive dollar adjustment method (ADAM), which is based on the assumption that the selling price is a linear function of the property attributes. The second, is the additive percentage adjustments method (APaM), which may be rationalized by a number of functional forms. In general, the percentage difference in prices between a subject and a comparable is found by adding functions of the two properties' attributes. The third is the multiplicative percentage adjustment method (MPaM), in which it is supposed that the ratio of the selling price to that of the comparable is equal to the product of functions of the subject and the comparable's attributes.The evaluation of hedonic prices in applying AGMs can be done directly through paired data analysis and indirectly by acquiring hedonic prices obtained through the application of multiple regression analysis to a sufficiently large sample. There are situations in which both modes are not very applicable due to the lack of data suitable for the application of the paired analysis and the limited availability of sufficient data to the application of multiple regressions (Colwell, Cannaday, and Wu, 1983). Even when the data are available, a statistical analysis does not always lead to consistent results in terms of quantities because they achieved following generalizations that are not always able to take into account the specificiti","PeriodicalId":35888,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Real Estate Literature","volume":"41 1","pages":"403-427"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90601505","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2016-05-01DOI: 10.5555/0927-7544.24.2.317
Wei Lan Chong, K. H. Ting, F. Cheng
(ProQuest: ... denotes formulae omitted.)Since early 2000, the real estate investment trust (REIT) markets in Asia have grown significantly. The REIT industry is booming and is increasingly important in the regional capital market with the recovery from the Global Financial Crisis in 2009. The Singaporean REIT (S-REIT) market is the second largest REIT market in Asia after the Japanese REIT (J-REIT) market, which accounted for 25% of the total market capitalization of Asian REIT by July 2016. This indicates the contribution and significance of Singapore in the capitalization and development of the Asian REIT market.Singapore has consistent economic performance and has ranked second for five consecutive years in the Global Competiveness Index (GCI), which captures the fundamentals of the city-state economy (World Economic Forum, 2015). More importantly, Singapore is ranked third in the world as a global financial center after London and New York in the Global Financial Centers Index 19 (The Global Financial Centers Index 19, 2016). In addition, Singapore is the top global financial center in the Asia Pacific region. Singapore is also ranked eleventh in global real estate transparency and is ranked second after Australia in the pan-Asia regions in the Global Real Estate Transparency Index (Jones Lang LaSalle, 2016). This clearly indicates that Singapore is a successful financial hub in Asia, pan-Asia hub regions, and in the world for all categories of financial products and services. This includes various financial industry sectors such as the listed property securities and REITs in the Asia Pacific region.Singapore plays a significant role in property securities or property companies in Singapore (Ong, 1994, 1995; Liow, 1997, 2000, 2001a, 2001b; Newell, Chau, Wong, and Liow, 2009), property securities or real estate securities in Asia (Ooi and Liow, 2004; Liow and Sim, 2006; Liow, 2007; Liow, Ho, Ibrahim, and Chen, 2009; Nguyen, 2011; Liow, 2012; Liow and Chen, 2013), real estate markets in Asia (Liow and Webb, 2008; Liow and Adair, 2009; Newell, Chau, Wong, and Liow, 2009; Newell, 2013), REITs in Singapore (Sing and Ling, 2003; Newell, Pham, and Ooi, 2015), and REITs in Asia (Ooi, Newell, and Sing, 2006; Newell, 2012; Pham, 2012).In addition, this also accelerates the growth and development of REITs in other parts of Asia such as documented in the literature for the leading J-REITs in Asia (Kutsuna, Dimovski, and Brooks, 2008; Ong, Ooi, and Kawaguichi, 2011; Newell and Peng, 2012), Hong Kong (Newell, Wu, Chau, and Wong, 2010), Malaysia (Newell and Osmadi, 2009, 2010; Sing, Ho, and Mak, 2002), Taiwan (Lin, 2007; Lee, Kuo, Lee, and Lin, 2011; Peng and Newell, 2012), South Korea (Pham, 2011a), and Thailand (Pham, 2011b).Other studies in the context of pan-Asia REIT include volatility behavior in Asian REITs (Tsai, 2013), convergent behavior (Tsai and Lee, 2012), risk management in Asian REITs (Chiang, Tsai, and Sing, 2013), sponsor backing in Asian
(ProQuest:……表示省略公式。)自2000年初以来,亚洲的房地产投资信托基金(REIT)市场大幅增长。随着2009年全球金融危机的复苏,房地产投资信托基金行业正在蓬勃发展,在区域资本市场中的地位日益重要。新加坡房地产投资信托基金(S-REIT)市场是亚洲第二大房地产投资信托基金市场,仅次于日本房地产投资信托基金(J-REIT)市场,截至2016年7月,日本房地产投资信托基金占亚洲房地产投资信托基金总市值的25%。这表明新加坡在亚洲REIT市场资本化和发展中的贡献和意义。新加坡的经济表现稳定,连续五年在全球竞争力指数(GCI)中排名第二,该指数反映了城市国家经济的基本面(世界经济论坛,2015年)。更重要的是,在全球金融中心指数19 (the global financial Centers Index 19, 2016)中,新加坡作为全球金融中心排名世界第三,仅次于伦敦和纽约。此外,新加坡是亚太地区最大的全球金融中心。在全球房地产透明度指数中,新加坡在全球房地产透明度方面排名第11位,在泛亚地区排名第二,仅次于澳大利亚(仲量联行,2016)。这清楚地表明,新加坡是一个成功的金融中心在亚洲,泛亚中心地区,并在世界上所有类别的金融产品和服务。这包括不同的金融行业,如上市房地产证券和房地产投资信托基金在亚太地区。新加坡在新加坡的房地产证券或房地产公司中发挥着重要作用(Ong, 1994,1995;廖,1997,2000,2001a, 2001b;Newell, Chau, Wong, and Liow, 2009),亚洲的房地产证券或房地产证券(Ooi and Liow, 2004;Liow and Sim, 2006;Liow, 2007;Liow, Ho, Ibrahim, and Chen, 2009;阮,2011;Liow, 2012;Liow and Chen, 2013),亚洲房地产市场(Liow and Webb, 2008;Liow and Adair, 2009;Newell, Chau, Wong, and Liow, 2009;Newell, 2013),新加坡的REITs (Sing and Ling, 2003;Newell, Pham, and Ooi, 2015),以及亚洲的REITs (Ooi, Newell, and Sing, 2006;纽厄尔,2012;范教授,2012)。此外,这也加速了亚洲其他地区房地产投资信托基金的增长和发展,如亚洲领先的J-REITs的文献(Kutsuna, Dimovski, and Brooks, 2008;Ong, Ooi, and Kawaguichi, 2011;Newell and Peng, 2012),香港(Newell, Wu, Chau, and Wong, 2010),马来西亚(Newell and Osmadi, 2009, 2010;Sing, Ho, and Mak, 2002),台湾(Lin, 2007;李,郭,李,林,2011;Peng and Newell, 2012),韩国(Pham, 2011a)和泰国(Pham, 2011b)。泛亚洲REIT背景下的其他研究包括亚洲REIT的波动行为(Tsai, 2013)、趋同行为(Tsai and Lee, 2012)、亚洲REIT的风险管理(Chiang, Tsai, and Sing, 2013)、亚洲REIT ipo的保荐人支持(Wong, Ong, and Ooi, 2013)、REITs对亚洲经济的影响(APREA, 2014a)、REITs的法规和税收(APREA, 2014b)、亚洲REITs的自由现金流和代理成本问题(Chong, Hassan, Ting, and Cheng, 2015)、亚洲REITs之间的动态联系(Loo, Anuar, and Ramakrishnan, 2015),以及宏观经济与亚洲REIT市场的一体化(Loo, Anuar, and Ramakrishnan, 2016)。自2000年以来,在日本、新加坡、香港、马来西亚、台湾和韩国共成立了127家REITs,截至2015年12月总市值为1694.3亿美元。表1显示了2000年至2015年这些主要亚洲房地产投资信托基金市场的重要性和增长情况。表2显示了截至2016年7月亚洲主要房地产投资信托基金市场的重要性和增长情况。可以看出,在亚洲房地产投资信托基金市场,尤其是日本、新加坡和香港,房地产投资信托基金的数量和市值都在扩大。截至2016年7月,S-REITs的市值为U. ...
{"title":"The Impacts of Corporate Governance on the Performance of REITs in Singapore","authors":"Wei Lan Chong, K. H. Ting, F. Cheng","doi":"10.5555/0927-7544.24.2.317","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5555/0927-7544.24.2.317","url":null,"abstract":"(ProQuest: ... denotes formulae omitted.)Since early 2000, the real estate investment trust (REIT) markets in Asia have grown significantly. The REIT industry is booming and is increasingly important in the regional capital market with the recovery from the Global Financial Crisis in 2009. The Singaporean REIT (S-REIT) market is the second largest REIT market in Asia after the Japanese REIT (J-REIT) market, which accounted for 25% of the total market capitalization of Asian REIT by July 2016. This indicates the contribution and significance of Singapore in the capitalization and development of the Asian REIT market.Singapore has consistent economic performance and has ranked second for five consecutive years in the Global Competiveness Index (GCI), which captures the fundamentals of the city-state economy (World Economic Forum, 2015). More importantly, Singapore is ranked third in the world as a global financial center after London and New York in the Global Financial Centers Index 19 (The Global Financial Centers Index 19, 2016). In addition, Singapore is the top global financial center in the Asia Pacific region. Singapore is also ranked eleventh in global real estate transparency and is ranked second after Australia in the pan-Asia regions in the Global Real Estate Transparency Index (Jones Lang LaSalle, 2016). This clearly indicates that Singapore is a successful financial hub in Asia, pan-Asia hub regions, and in the world for all categories of financial products and services. This includes various financial industry sectors such as the listed property securities and REITs in the Asia Pacific region.Singapore plays a significant role in property securities or property companies in Singapore (Ong, 1994, 1995; Liow, 1997, 2000, 2001a, 2001b; Newell, Chau, Wong, and Liow, 2009), property securities or real estate securities in Asia (Ooi and Liow, 2004; Liow and Sim, 2006; Liow, 2007; Liow, Ho, Ibrahim, and Chen, 2009; Nguyen, 2011; Liow, 2012; Liow and Chen, 2013), real estate markets in Asia (Liow and Webb, 2008; Liow and Adair, 2009; Newell, Chau, Wong, and Liow, 2009; Newell, 2013), REITs in Singapore (Sing and Ling, 2003; Newell, Pham, and Ooi, 2015), and REITs in Asia (Ooi, Newell, and Sing, 2006; Newell, 2012; Pham, 2012).In addition, this also accelerates the growth and development of REITs in other parts of Asia such as documented in the literature for the leading J-REITs in Asia (Kutsuna, Dimovski, and Brooks, 2008; Ong, Ooi, and Kawaguichi, 2011; Newell and Peng, 2012), Hong Kong (Newell, Wu, Chau, and Wong, 2010), Malaysia (Newell and Osmadi, 2009, 2010; Sing, Ho, and Mak, 2002), Taiwan (Lin, 2007; Lee, Kuo, Lee, and Lin, 2011; Peng and Newell, 2012), South Korea (Pham, 2011a), and Thailand (Pham, 2011b).Other studies in the context of pan-Asia REIT include volatility behavior in Asian REITs (Tsai, 2013), convergent behavior (Tsai and Lee, 2012), risk management in Asian REITs (Chiang, Tsai, and Sing, 2013), sponsor backing in Asian ","PeriodicalId":35888,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Real Estate Literature","volume":"14 1","pages":"319-344"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82031208","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2016-01-06DOI: 10.1080/09277544.2021.1876436
Jesse D. Saginor
Abstract The Real Estate Academic Leadership (REAL) rankings for authors and institutions began in 2015 with a straightforward approach to measure author and institutional contributions to real estate research. While real estate research may traditionally be allied with business schools, authorship varies across university programs, as well as public and private organizations. That level of diversity makes it difficult to easily rank programs or departments, resulting in the university or organization as being the primary unit of analysis. The initial rankings in 2011–2015 attempted to highlight the authors and institutions making the greatest contributions to the field of real estate research based on publications in the top three peer-reviewed real estate journals. To some extent, the 2012–2016 rankings served as a check on the rankings from 2011– 2015 to see if there were any major issues with the simple methodology used in the initial rankings. The 2013–2017 REAL rankings continue to highlight that pa...
{"title":"The Real Estate Academic Leadership (REAL) Rankings for 2016–2020","authors":"Jesse D. Saginor","doi":"10.1080/09277544.2021.1876436","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09277544.2021.1876436","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The Real Estate Academic Leadership (REAL) rankings for authors and institutions began in 2015 with a straightforward approach to measure author and institutional contributions to real estate research. While real estate research may traditionally be allied with business schools, authorship varies across university programs, as well as public and private organizations. That level of diversity makes it difficult to easily rank programs or departments, resulting in the university or organization as being the primary unit of analysis. The initial rankings in 2011–2015 attempted to highlight the authors and institutions making the greatest contributions to the field of real estate research based on publications in the top three peer-reviewed real estate journals. To some extent, the 2012–2016 rankings served as a check on the rankings from 2011– 2015 to see if there were any major issues with the simple methodology used in the initial rankings. The 2013–2017 REAL rankings continue to highlight that pa...","PeriodicalId":35888,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Real Estate Literature","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87306165","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2016-01-01DOI: 10.1080/10835547.2016.12090437
P. Christensen, D. McIlhatton, N. Blair
The role that real estate can have for enhancing the effectiveness and efficiency of an area to respond to natural and man-made crises has received little attention. This research demonstrates how the real estate profession plays a fundamental role in the preparedness, response, reconstruction, and recovery stages of a crisis. The geospatial technology developed and used in this research illustrates how geographic information, geographic information systems, gaming technology, and the creation of a user interface can improve the decision-making process for those tasked with ensuring resilience in urban areas. In particular, the ability of decision makers to create real-time simulations with this model, including temporal and visual information about the impact of various interventions, enables decision makers to better understand intervention options and make better decisions. Three scenarios are presented in which this technology was applied: flooding, riots/protests, and terrorist events.
{"title":"Multi-Purpose 3-D Real Estate: Understanding the Role of 3-D Technology for Enhancing Resilience","authors":"P. Christensen, D. McIlhatton, N. Blair","doi":"10.1080/10835547.2016.12090437","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.2016.12090437","url":null,"abstract":"The role that real estate can have for enhancing the effectiveness and efficiency of an area to respond to natural and man-made crises has received little attention. This research demonstrates how the real estate profession plays a fundamental role in the preparedness, response, reconstruction, and recovery stages of a crisis. The geospatial technology developed and used in this research illustrates how geographic information, geographic information systems, gaming technology, and the creation of a user interface can improve the decision-making process for those tasked with ensuring resilience in urban areas. In particular, the ability of decision makers to create real-time simulations with this model, including temporal and visual information about the impact of various interventions, enables decision makers to better understand intervention options and make better decisions. Three scenarios are presented in which this technology was applied: flooding, riots/protests, and terrorist events.","PeriodicalId":35888,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Real Estate Literature","volume":"223 1","pages":"453-472"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76685443","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2015-07-31DOI: 10.5555/0927-7544.23.1.85
G. Galloppo, L. Mundula
AbstractIn this paper, we examine closed real estate funds, comparing the Italian case with the international closed real estate fund market. We study whether the ''public hand'' has acted in an efficient market way to achieve return results in line with private competitors. In the last 10 years, international closed real estate funds have had an annual average of 0.5%. This result represents a very poor performance when compared with the returns offered by international bonds (5.6%) or international l equity markets (6.9%). This positive trend, however, is not followed by the closed real estate investment fund sponsored by the Italian government. On average, during the recent financial crisis, the returns of the international closed real estate funds in the euro area increased by more than 14 percentage points, while those of the Swiss franc area were about 1.5%.(ProQuest: ... denotes formulae omitted.)The management of real estate owned by public administrations is a thorny issue. First, there is the problem of reducing the financial resources available to the public, and the consequent need to rationalize spending. Second, there is the need to transform public real assets, which are often considered a passive voice in a government budget, into a resource.A lot of policymakers stress that government should orient its decisions through public / private partnerships that employ innovative financing instruments that enable the development of modern actions, effective and efficient in managing and using public assets. The real challenge is to be found in the enhancement of the public as a strategic lever to overcome the balance crisis.In Italy since 1999 disposals of public assets have been made by using securitization or real estate funds. In Italy, securitization has led to significant divestments by both banks (mainly loans) and government institutions.In this paper, we deal with the subject of the performance of public real estate funds. This is a financial instrument that allows the investor to participate in the economic results of private enterprises taken in the housing sector, not using the typical pattern of participation in a company, but the scheme of assets managed by a professional intermediary. We tackle the issue of performance, not according to what is typically called the closed-end fund puzzle, but by focusing on public real estate funds.The difficulties of the Italian government are extensively known, and certainly exacerbated, by the persistent state of international crisis. Indeed, Italy, having accumulated a huge public debt, has decided to use these financial instruments to address different needs regarding public spending, health, and welfare. These difficulties, mainly to be reconnected to the high level of public debt, in January 2013 have exceeded the remarkable level of 2,000 billion euros. Among the various economic policy tools with which Italy has decided to deal with this crisis, there are closed real estate funds.
{"title":"Analysis of closed real estate funds in Italy","authors":"G. Galloppo, L. Mundula","doi":"10.5555/0927-7544.23.1.85","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5555/0927-7544.23.1.85","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractIn this paper, we examine closed real estate funds, comparing the Italian case with the international closed real estate fund market. We study whether the ''public hand'' has acted in an efficient market way to achieve return results in line with private competitors. In the last 10 years, international closed real estate funds have had an annual average of 0.5%. This result represents a very poor performance when compared with the returns offered by international bonds (5.6%) or international l equity markets (6.9%). This positive trend, however, is not followed by the closed real estate investment fund sponsored by the Italian government. On average, during the recent financial crisis, the returns of the international closed real estate funds in the euro area increased by more than 14 percentage points, while those of the Swiss franc area were about 1.5%.(ProQuest: ... denotes formulae omitted.)The management of real estate owned by public administrations is a thorny issue. First, there is the problem of reducing the financial resources available to the public, and the consequent need to rationalize spending. Second, there is the need to transform public real assets, which are often considered a passive voice in a government budget, into a resource.A lot of policymakers stress that government should orient its decisions through public / private partnerships that employ innovative financing instruments that enable the development of modern actions, effective and efficient in managing and using public assets. The real challenge is to be found in the enhancement of the public as a strategic lever to overcome the balance crisis.In Italy since 1999 disposals of public assets have been made by using securitization or real estate funds. In Italy, securitization has led to significant divestments by both banks (mainly loans) and government institutions.In this paper, we deal with the subject of the performance of public real estate funds. This is a financial instrument that allows the investor to participate in the economic results of private enterprises taken in the housing sector, not using the typical pattern of participation in a company, but the scheme of assets managed by a professional intermediary. We tackle the issue of performance, not according to what is typically called the closed-end fund puzzle, but by focusing on public real estate funds.The difficulties of the Italian government are extensively known, and certainly exacerbated, by the persistent state of international crisis. Indeed, Italy, having accumulated a huge public debt, has decided to use these financial instruments to address different needs regarding public spending, health, and welfare. These difficulties, mainly to be reconnected to the high level of public debt, in January 2013 have exceeded the remarkable level of 2,000 billion euros. Among the various economic policy tools with which Italy has decided to deal with this crisis, there are closed real estate funds. ","PeriodicalId":35888,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Real Estate Literature","volume":" 15","pages":"85-113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72500194","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}