Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine最新文献

Purpose of review: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an overburdened healthcare system. While an increased rate of ACS is expected due to the pro-thrombotic state of COVID patients, observed ACS incidence and admission rates were paradoxically decreased during the (first wave of the) pandemic. In this narrative review, we will discuss potential reasons for this decrease in ACS incidence. Furthermore, we will discuss ACS management during the COVID-19 pandemic, and we will discuss outcomes in ACS.

Recent findings: A reluctance to seek medical contact (in order not to further overburden the health system or due to fear of being infected with COVID-19 while in hospital) and unavailability of medical services seem to be important factors. This may have led to an increased symptom onset to first medical contact time and an increased rate of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. A trend towards less invasive management was observed (less invasive coronary angiography in NSTEMI patients and more "fibrinolysis-first" in STEMI patients), although a large variation was observed with some centers having a relative increase in early invasive management. Patients with ACS and concomitant COVID-19 infection have worse outcomes compared to ACS patients without COVID-19 infection. All of the above led to worse clinical outcomes in patients presenting with ACS during the COVID-19 pandemic. Interestingly, staffing and hospital bed shortages led to experimentation with very early discharge (24 h after primary PCI) in low-risk STEMI patients which had a very good prognosis and resulted in significant shorter hospital duration.

Summary: During the COVID-19 pandemic, ACS incidence and admission rates were decreased, symptom onset to first medical contact time prolonged, and out-of-hospital rates increased. A trend towards less invasive management was observed. Patients presenting with ACS during the COVID-19 pandemic had a worse outcome. On the other hand, experimental very early discharge in low-risk patients may relieve the healthcare system. Such initiatives, and strategies to lower the reluctance of patients with ACS symptoms to seek medical help, are vital to improve prognosis in ACS patients in future pandemics.

Purpose of review: This paper assesses recent literature on the impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing revascularization. Specifically, to determine if there is an optimal revascularization strategy for this patient population, and if there are other modalities to assess the risks.

Recent findings: There are limited new data in the last year addressing this clinical question. Recently there have been a series of studies which reinforced that COPD is a key independent risk factor for adverse outcomes after revascularization. There is no optimal revascularization strategy; however, there was a nonsignificant signal of potential benefit with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with short-term outcomes in the SYNTAXES trial. Currently, pulmonary function tests (PFT) are limited in clarifying risk assessments prior to revascularization, and there are investigations into the use of biomarkers to provide further insight into this increased risk of adverse outcomes in patients with COPD.

Summary: COPD is a key risk factor for poor outcomes in patients requiring revascularization. More investigations are needed to determine the optimum revascularization strategy.