Pub Date : 2021-01-01Epub Date: 2021-04-16DOI: 10.1007/s40521-021-00286-y
Melanie C Dispenza
Purpose of review: Studies show that inhibitors of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTKis), currently FDA-approved for the treatment of B cell malignancies, can prevent IgE-mediated reactions through broad inhibition of the FcεRI signaling pathway in human mast cells and basophils. This review will summarize recent data supporting the use of these drugs as novel therapies in various allergic disorders.
Recent findings: Recent studies have shown that BTKis can prevent IgE-mediated degranulation and cytokine production in primary human mast cells and basophils. Two oral doses of the second-generation BTKi acalabrutinib can completely prevent moderate passive systemic anaphylaxis in humanized mice and even protect against death during severe anaphylaxis. Furthermore, two doses of ibrutinib can reduce or eliminate skin prick test responses to foods and aeroallergens in allergic subjects. BTKis in development also show efficacy in clinical trials for chronic urticaria. Unlike other therapies targeting IgE, such as omalizumab, BTKis appear to have rapid onset and transient effects, making them ideal candidates for intermittent use to prevent acute reactions such as IgE-mediated anaphylaxis.
Summary: These studies suggest that BTKis may be capable of preventing IgE-mediated anaphylaxis, paving the way for future trials in food allergy and urticaria.
{"title":"The Use of Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors to Treat Allergic Disorders.","authors":"Melanie C Dispenza","doi":"10.1007/s40521-021-00286-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40521-021-00286-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Studies show that inhibitors of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTKis), currently FDA-approved for the treatment of B cell malignancies, can prevent IgE-mediated reactions through broad inhibition of the FcεRI signaling pathway in human mast cells and basophils. This review will summarize recent data supporting the use of these drugs as novel therapies in various allergic disorders.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent studies have shown that BTKis can prevent IgE-mediated degranulation and cytokine production in primary human mast cells and basophils. Two oral doses of the second-generation BTKi acalabrutinib can completely prevent moderate passive systemic anaphylaxis in humanized mice and even protect against death during severe anaphylaxis. Furthermore, two doses of ibrutinib can reduce or eliminate skin prick test responses to foods and aeroallergens in allergic subjects. BTKis in development also show efficacy in clinical trials for chronic urticaria. Unlike other therapies targeting IgE, such as omalizumab, BTKis appear to have rapid onset and transient effects, making them ideal candidates for intermittent use to prevent acute reactions such as IgE-mediated anaphylaxis.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>These studies suggest that BTKis may be capable of preventing IgE-mediated anaphylaxis, paving the way for future trials in food allergy and urticaria.</p>","PeriodicalId":36209,"journal":{"name":"Current Treatment Options in Allergy","volume":"8 3","pages":"261-273"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40521-021-00286-y","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38894279","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-01Epub Date: 2021-03-10DOI: 10.1007/s40521-021-00284-0
Kanwaljit K Brar, Albana Harizaj, Anna Nowak-Wegrzyn
Purpose of review: Management of anaphylaxis during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic should consider local infection rates so as to not burden local ED at times of pandemic, while also protecting patients from infection risks and progression of anaphylaxis. In this review, we identify a treatment strategy for anaphylaxis that balances the risks versus benefits of ED versus home management in this unprecedented time.
Recent findings: Physicians and patients have had to adapt new approaches to medical care during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic due to restricted access to health care facilities. Telemedicine has substituted in-person visits, and such a drastic change in the patient care paradigm presents a need to revise the acute management of anaphylaxis.
Summary: Physicians should utilize telemedicine during this time to engage in shared decision-making with patients and their families to devise an anaphylaxis plan of management that emphasizes home care when symptoms are mild with an exception for ED care if a patient has had severe, near-fatal anaphylaxis episodes in the past. Previous anaphylaxis recommendations should remain in place despite the pandemic, including prompt use of epinephrine when needed, avoidance of known allergens, training of patients and their caregivers, and carrying of epinephrine autoinjector devices at all times to remain prepared in the event of an anaphylaxis episode.
Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40521-021-00284-0.
{"title":"Management of Anaphylaxis During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic.","authors":"Kanwaljit K Brar, Albana Harizaj, Anna Nowak-Wegrzyn","doi":"10.1007/s40521-021-00284-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40521-021-00284-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Management of anaphylaxis during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic should consider local infection rates so as to not burden local ED at times of pandemic, while also protecting patients from infection risks and progression of anaphylaxis. In this review, we identify a treatment strategy for anaphylaxis that balances the risks versus benefits of ED versus home management in this unprecedented time.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Physicians and patients have had to adapt new approaches to medical care during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic due to restricted access to health care facilities. Telemedicine has substituted in-person visits, and such a drastic change in the patient care paradigm presents a need to revise the acute management of anaphylaxis.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Physicians should utilize telemedicine during this time to engage in shared decision-making with patients and their families to devise an anaphylaxis plan of management that emphasizes home care when symptoms are mild with an exception for ED care if a patient has had severe, near-fatal anaphylaxis episodes in the past. Previous anaphylaxis recommendations should remain in place despite the pandemic, including prompt use of epinephrine when needed, avoidance of known allergens, training of patients and their caregivers, and carrying of epinephrine autoinjector devices at all times to remain prepared in the event of an anaphylaxis episode.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40521-021-00284-0.</p>","PeriodicalId":36209,"journal":{"name":"Current Treatment Options in Allergy","volume":"8 2","pages":"88-96"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7946336/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25481694","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-01Epub Date: 2021-01-23DOI: 10.1007/s40521-020-00274-8
Linda Herbert, Mary Jane Marchisotto, Brian Vickery
Purpose: Food allergy management places a daily psychosocial burden on patients and their caregivers. New food allergy treatments may positively impact their lives, but also introduce new stressors. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the current state of the literature regarding patients' and caregivers' food allergy experiences and needs within the United States as well as a set of recommendations regarding how best to proceed with patient-centered development and evaluation of new food allergy treatments.
Recent findings: The first pharmaceutical-grade product for peanut oral immunotherapy was approved in the United States for children aged 4-17 years following a successful international Phase 3 trial. This new treatment is only the first of several food allergy treatments currently under development. Patients will soon be presented with multiple options for food allergy treatment and will need to make decisions about what treatment is best for them.
Summary: Allergy researchers and providers are encouraged to consider patients' perspectives and needs when developing and evaluating new food allergy treatments. Recommendations regarding next steps include the development of new patient-reported outcome tools, focus on psychosocial support, health disparities, and financial implications, and research harmonization and interdisciplinary collaboration.
{"title":"Patients' Perspectives and Needs on Novel Food Allergy Treatments in the United States.","authors":"Linda Herbert, Mary Jane Marchisotto, Brian Vickery","doi":"10.1007/s40521-020-00274-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40521-020-00274-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Food allergy management places a daily psychosocial burden on patients and their caregivers. New food allergy treatments may positively impact their lives, but also introduce new stressors. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the current state of the literature regarding patients' and caregivers' food allergy experiences and needs within the United States as well as a set of recommendations regarding how best to proceed with patient-centered development and evaluation of new food allergy treatments.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The first pharmaceutical-grade product for peanut oral immunotherapy was approved in the United States for children aged 4-17 years following a successful international Phase 3 trial. This new treatment is only the first of several food allergy treatments currently under development. Patients will soon be presented with multiple options for food allergy treatment and will need to make decisions about what treatment is best for them.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Allergy researchers and providers are encouraged to consider patients' perspectives and needs when developing and evaluating new food allergy treatments. Recommendations regarding next steps include the development of new patient-reported outcome tools, focus on psychosocial support, health disparities, and financial implications, and research harmonization and interdisciplinary collaboration.</p>","PeriodicalId":36209,"journal":{"name":"Current Treatment Options in Allergy","volume":"8 1","pages":"9-20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7825384/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10683674","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-01Epub Date: 2021-05-21DOI: 10.1007/s40521-021-00289-9
Nicholas Stefanovic, Alan D Irvine, Carsten Flohr
Purpose of review: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder affecting up to 20% of children and up to 5% of adults worldwide, contributing to significant disease-related morbidity in this patient cohort. Its aetiopathogenesis is underpinned by multiple factors, including genetic susceptibility, skin barrier defects, a skewed cutaneous immune response and microbiome perturbation in both the skin and the gut. In this review, we aim to examine the biological effects of key environmental exposures (the sum of which is termed the "exposome") at the population, community and individual levels in order to describe their effect on AD pathogenesis.
Recent findings: It is now understood that as well as considering the type of environmental exposure with regard to its effect on AD pathogenesis, the dosage and timing of the exposure are both critical domains that may lead to either exacerbation or amelioration of disease. In this review, we consider the effects of population-wide exposures such as climate change, migration and urbanization; community-specific exposures such as air pollution, water hardness and allergic sensitisation; and individual factors such as diet, microbiome alteration, psychosocial stress and the impact of topical and systemic therapy.
Summary: This review summarises the interaction of the above environmental factors with the other domains of AD pathogenesis, namely, the inherent genetic defects, the skin barrier, the immune system and the cutaneous and gut microbiota. We specifically emphasise the timing and dosage of exposures and its effect on the cellular and molecular pathways implicated in AD.
综述目的:特应性皮炎(AD)是一种慢性炎症性皮肤病,影响着全球多达 20% 的儿童和多达 5% 的成年人,在这些患者群体中造成了严重的疾病相关发病率。其发病机制由多种因素共同作用,包括遗传易感性、皮肤屏障缺陷、皮肤免疫反应失衡以及皮肤和肠道微生物群紊乱。在这篇综述中,我们旨在从人群、社区和个体三个层面研究主要环境暴露(总称为 "暴露体")的生物效应,以描述它们对注意力缺失症发病机制的影响:现在的理解是,除了考虑环境暴露类型对注意力缺失症发病机制的影响外,暴露的剂量和时间也是可能导致疾病加重或改善的关键领域。在这篇综述中,我们考虑了气候变化、移民和城市化等全人群暴露的影响;空气污染、水硬度和过敏致敏等社区特异性暴露的影响;以及饮食、微生物组改变、社会心理压力和局部及系统治疗的影响等个体因素的影响。摘要:这篇综述总结了上述环境因素与 AD 发病机制的其他领域(即固有遗传缺陷、皮肤屏障、免疫系统以及皮肤和肠道微生物群)之间的相互作用。我们特别强调了暴露的时间和剂量及其对与 AD 有关的细胞和分子途径的影响。
{"title":"The Role of the Environment and Exposome in Atopic Dermatitis.","authors":"Nicholas Stefanovic, Alan D Irvine, Carsten Flohr","doi":"10.1007/s40521-021-00289-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40521-021-00289-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder affecting up to 20% of children and up to 5% of adults worldwide, contributing to significant disease-related morbidity in this patient cohort. Its aetiopathogenesis is underpinned by multiple factors, including genetic susceptibility, skin barrier defects, a skewed cutaneous immune response and microbiome perturbation in both the skin and the gut. In this review, we aim to examine the biological effects of key environmental exposures (the sum of which is termed the \"exposome\") at the population, community and individual levels in order to describe their effect on AD pathogenesis.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>It is now understood that as well as considering the type of environmental exposure with regard to its effect on AD pathogenesis, the dosage and timing of the exposure are both critical domains that may lead to either exacerbation or amelioration of disease. In this review, we consider the effects of population-wide exposures such as climate change, migration and urbanization; community-specific exposures such as air pollution, water hardness and allergic sensitisation; and individual factors such as diet, microbiome alteration, psychosocial stress and the impact of topical and systemic therapy.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This review summarises the interaction of the above environmental factors with the other domains of AD pathogenesis, namely, the inherent genetic defects, the skin barrier, the immune system and the cutaneous and gut microbiota. We specifically emphasise the timing and dosage of exposures and its effect on the cellular and molecular pathways implicated in AD.</p>","PeriodicalId":36209,"journal":{"name":"Current Treatment Options in Allergy","volume":"8 3","pages":"222-241"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8139547/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39034446","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-01Epub Date: 2021-06-15DOI: 10.1007/s40521-021-00290-2
H A Brough, R Gourgey, S Radulovic, J C Caubet, G Lack, A Anagnostou
Purpose of review: In this review, we sought to describe the most recent advances in the dietary and medical management of peanut and tree nut allergy, including selective introduction and immunotherapy.
Recent findings: Dietary updates include changes to labeling laws, improved information sources, and new apps for buying foods in shops and overseas to better protect individuals with nut allergies. There are still issues in the management of nut allergies in schools, such as parents having to resort to packed lunches instead of school meals and patients experiencing bullying. Air travel also poses concern, but additional resources are now available to travelers, and recent evidence suggest limited airborne exposure to nuts. The medical management of anaphylaxis is use of epinephrine; however, this remains underutilized. Needle length and administration devices have been recently debated considering the risk of bone penetration vs subcutaneous administration, and autoinjectors seem to deliver higher peak concentrations than syringes. Selective nut introduction has gained momentum in the last 5 years, demonstrating improved quality of life but with the need for motivated parents for continued consumption and available resources for challenges. Immunotherapy to nuts is also a rapidly developing field, with the balance of efficacy and safety being important considerations in the differing modes of administration.
Summary: The management of nut allergies is a rapidly developing field, and dietary and medical management have progressed significantly in the last 5 years. Future research directions include improving safety and efficacy of food immunotherapy and examining patients' goals for therapy and treatment outcomes.
{"title":"Latest Developments in the Management of Nut Allergies.","authors":"H A Brough, R Gourgey, S Radulovic, J C Caubet, G Lack, A Anagnostou","doi":"10.1007/s40521-021-00290-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40521-021-00290-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>In this review, we sought to describe the most recent advances in the dietary and medical management of peanut and tree nut allergy, including selective introduction and immunotherapy.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Dietary updates include changes to labeling laws, improved information sources, and new apps for buying foods in shops and overseas to better protect individuals with nut allergies. There are still issues in the management of nut allergies in schools, such as parents having to resort to packed lunches instead of school meals and patients experiencing bullying. Air travel also poses concern, but additional resources are now available to travelers, and recent evidence suggest limited airborne exposure to nuts. The medical management of anaphylaxis is use of epinephrine; however, this remains underutilized. Needle length and administration devices have been recently debated considering the risk of bone penetration vs subcutaneous administration, and autoinjectors seem to deliver higher peak concentrations than syringes. Selective nut introduction has gained momentum in the last 5 years, demonstrating improved quality of life but with the need for motivated parents for continued consumption and available resources for challenges. Immunotherapy to nuts is also a rapidly developing field, with the balance of efficacy and safety being important considerations in the differing modes of administration.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The management of nut allergies is a rapidly developing field, and dietary and medical management have progressed significantly in the last 5 years. Future research directions include improving safety and efficacy of food immunotherapy and examining patients' goals for therapy and treatment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":36209,"journal":{"name":"Current Treatment Options in Allergy","volume":"8 2","pages":"97-110"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40521-021-00290-2","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39250319","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-11-26DOI: 10.1007/s40521-020-00257-9
M. McMillan, M. Morais‐Almeida
{"title":"The Challenge of Establishing the Burden of Anaphylaxis: Some Recent Trends","authors":"M. McMillan, M. Morais‐Almeida","doi":"10.1007/s40521-020-00257-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40521-020-00257-9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36209,"journal":{"name":"Current Treatment Options in Allergy","volume":"7 1","pages":"441 - 456"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2020-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40521-020-00257-9","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49379090","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-09-10DOI: 10.1007/s40521-020-00273-9
A. Daschner, C. Cuéllar
{"title":"Progress in Anisakis Allergy Research: Milestones and Reversals","authors":"A. Daschner, C. Cuéllar","doi":"10.1007/s40521-020-00273-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40521-020-00273-9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36209,"journal":{"name":"Current Treatment Options in Allergy","volume":"7 1","pages":"457 - 470"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2020-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40521-020-00273-9","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44322228","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-09-01Epub Date: 2020-07-10DOI: 10.1007/s40521-020-00271-x
Jayanta Gupta, David J Margolis
Purpose of review: Mutations in the Filaggrin gene can cause absent or reduced filaggrin protein, leading to impaired keratinization and skin barrier defect, which produce characteristic phenotypes. In this short review, we report current evidence on the topic with special reference to atopic dermatitis, suggest future directions, and discuss therapeutic implications.
Recent findings: Numerous candidate gene association studies, genome-wide association studies, studies on copy number variations and most recently, sequencing studies, have confirmed the robust association of mutations in the Filaggrin gene with atopic dermatitis, and have also linked these mutations with several other disorders.
Summary: Filaggrin gene defects remain the strongest identified genetic risk factors for atopic dermatitis. Taken in conjunction with other genes found to be associated with this condition, genetic screening and identification of individuals at risk for atopic dermatitis could lead to personalized therapy. Manipulation of genetic regulatory elements to increase the amount of filaggrin protein in deficient individuals is an attractive treatment option for the future.
{"title":"Filaggrin gene mutations with special reference to atopic dermatitis.","authors":"Jayanta Gupta, David J Margolis","doi":"10.1007/s40521-020-00271-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40521-020-00271-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Mutations in the Filaggrin gene can cause absent or reduced filaggrin protein, leading to impaired keratinization and skin barrier defect, which produce characteristic phenotypes. In this short review, we report current evidence on the topic with special reference to atopic dermatitis, suggest future directions, and discuss therapeutic implications.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Numerous candidate gene association studies, genome-wide association studies, studies on copy number variations and most recently, sequencing studies, have confirmed the robust association of mutations in the Filaggrin gene with atopic dermatitis, and have also linked these mutations with several other disorders.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Filaggrin gene defects remain the strongest identified genetic risk factors for atopic dermatitis. Taken in conjunction with other genes found to be associated with this condition, genetic screening and identification of individuals at risk for atopic dermatitis could lead to personalized therapy. Manipulation of genetic regulatory elements to increase the amount of filaggrin protein in deficient individuals is an attractive treatment option for the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":36209,"journal":{"name":"Current Treatment Options in Allergy","volume":"7 3","pages":"403-413"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40521-020-00271-x","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25371894","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-08-18DOI: 10.1007/s40521-020-00272-w
M. Gatica-Ortega, M. Pastor-Nieto
{"title":"The Present and Future Burden of Contact Dermatitis from Acrylates in Manicure","authors":"M. Gatica-Ortega, M. Pastor-Nieto","doi":"10.1007/s40521-020-00272-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40521-020-00272-w","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36209,"journal":{"name":"Current Treatment Options in Allergy","volume":"7 1","pages":"291 - 311"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2020-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40521-020-00272-w","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49545505","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}