JBJS Open Access最新文献

Background: The use of systemic antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) and antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) is the accepted practice to reduce the risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in primary total knee arthroplasty (pTKA). However, practice varies internationally. This study's primary aim was to compare the risk of PJI revision after pTKA with ALBC + SAP vs. plain bone cement (PBC) + SAP, and the secondary aim was to assess whether the risk of PJI revision varies with the number of SAP doses.

Methods: Cohort of 289,926 pTKAs for osteoarthritis from arthroplasty registries in Denmark, New Zealand, Norway, Romania, and United States registered from 2010 to 2020. One-year revision for PJI following pTKA with ALBC + SAP vs. PBC + SAP, and single vs. multiple SAP doses was compared. We computed cumulative percent revision (1 minus Kaplan-Meier) using distributed analysis method and adjusted hazard rate ratios (HRRs) using Cox regression analyses within each registry. Advanced distributed meta-analysis was performed to summarize HRRs from all countries.

Results: Among all pTKAs, 64.4% were performed with ALBC + SAP. Each registry reported a 1-year cumulative percent revision for PJI of <1.00% for both pTKAs with ALBC + SAP (0.34%-0.80%) and with PBC + SAP (0.54%-0.69%). The distributed meta-analysis showed HRR = 1.21; (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-1.87) for ALBC + SAP compared with PBC + SAP. Similar risk of PJI revision was observed between pTKAs with ALBC + single vs. multiple doses of SAP: 2 doses (0.95; 95% CI, 0.68-1.33), 3 doses (1.09; 95% CI, 0.64-1.87), and 4 doses (1.23; 95% CI, 0.69-2.21). Comparable results were found for the PBC + SAP group except for higher risk of PJI revision with 4 doses of SAP (2.74; 95% CI, 1.11-6.75).

Conclusions: ALBC and PBC entailed similar risk of PJI revision when patients received SAP in pTKA, regardless of number of SAP doses. ALBC or PBC used in combination with SAP in pTKAs, with one single preoperative dose of SAP may be sufficient without compromising the patient safety.

Level of evidence: Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Introduction: Medical school curricula offer limited exposure to orthopaedic surgery, and few national initiatives aim to prepare students for orthopaedic surgery subinternships, which are critical for success in matching into orthopaedic residency. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of a single-day virtual "Subinternship Summit" for medical students in 2 key areas: 1) enhancing participants' confidence in their preparedness for orthopaedic subinternship rotations and 2) mitigating any disparities based on student characteristics, such as race/ethnicity, gender, or whether or not the student's school is affiliated with a "home" orthopaedic program.

Methods: In March 2024, a single-day national virtual summit was held, featuring panels on topics relevant to performance during orthopaedic subinternships. The panelists included senior medical students, orthopaedic residents, and attending orthopaedic surgeons from across the United States. Surveys were administered to participants through Qualtrics before and after the summit to collect demographic data and to assess confidence in 6 domains of subinternship performance using 5-point Likert-scale items: overall preparedness, on-call responsibilities, "soft skills," role in the operating room, role in the outpatient clinic, and understanding of resources. Our analysis included descriptive statistics, paired t tests, and multivariable linear regression. Significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results: Of 787 medical students who registered for summit, 426 attended, of whom 180 (42%) completed both the presummit and postsummit surveys. Before the summit, students reported low confidence in all domains, with 5 of 6 domains averaging less than moderate (3/5 points). Multivariable analysis revealed no differences in presummit confidence across various demographic characteristics. After the summit, all 6 domains showed significant increases in confidence, with the lowest average being 4/5 (all, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: This virtual summit effectively increased medical students' confidence in their preparedness and knowledge about orthopaedic surgery subinternships. Given the weight of subinternship performance in the match process, such an initiative may have the potential to increase medical students' success in residency applications.

Level of evidence: Level V. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Introduction: Orthopaedic surgery has the greatest degree of gender disparity among all medical specialties, presenting a little-explored opportunity to recruit women into orthopaedics early in the pipeline, particularly as undergraduate students. This study aimed to characterize the opinions of female premedical students regarding orthopaedic surgery as well as to assess the effectiveness of a virtual intervention in increasing interest in or improving attitudes toward the field.

Methods: In this prospective study, recruitment emails were sent to premedical advisors, who then circulated a survey that solicited responses from female-identifying premedical students. The survey consisted of questions about demographics, Likert scale questions about opinions of orthopaedic surgery, and an open-response section. At the end of the survey, respondents were provided the option to register for a Zoom panel, in which 4 female physicians described their experiences as women in orthopaedic surgery. Survey responses were analyzed using unpaired t tests for continuous variables and analysis of variance and Tukey's post hoc analysis for Likert scale responses.

Results: A total of 259 female premedical students completed the survey. Respondents most strongly agreed with the statements "orthopaedics is a male-dominated field" and "I wish I learned more about orthopaedics in college." Interest in pursuing orthopaedic surgery was greater among respondents who had undergone orthopaedic surgery, personally knew an orthopaedic surgeon, personally knew a female orthopaedic surgeon, or had shadowed in orthopaedic surgery. After attending the panel, attendees' interest in orthopaedic surgery significantly increased (p < 0.001), and attendees disagreed significantly more strongly with the notion that gender would limit their opportunities in orthopaedics (p = 0.013).

Conclusion: Early exposure to orthopaedic surgery was consistently associated with increased interest among respondents. In addition, exposure to female orthopaedic surgeons was associated with more positive opinions of orthopaedics, and the mentorship intervention proved effective at increasing interest in the field. These results reinforce the need for targeted, early-exposure programs to recruit premedical women into orthopaedic surgery.

Level of evidence: Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background: Microsurgical emergency revascularization surgery for traumatic upper-extremity amputations demands high resource use. Injury details and patient characteristics influence the decision of whether to revascularize or revise an amputation involving the upper extremity. Our aim was to study associations between those factors and unsuccessful revascularization to provide information for clinical decision-making regarding amputation injuries.

Methods: We studied all consecutive patients who had undergone an upper-extremity revascularization at Tampere University Hospital between 2009 and 2019. The primary outcome was the technical success or failure of the operation, which was defined as the survival or non-survival of the amputated tissue. Using logistic regression, we analyzed prognostic factors including age, sex, smoking status, diabetes mellitus, injury mechanism (cut, crush, or avulsion), extent of tissue loss before treatment (number of lost joints), and amputation type (total or subtotal).

Results: A total of 282 patients (mean age, 47 years; 14% female; mostly White Caucasian) were included. The proportion of successful revascularizations (survival of all reconstructed tissue) was 76% (214 of 282). An avulsion injury mechanism (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 5.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5 to 14.2), crush injury mechanism (aOR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.1 to 7.0]), and total amputation type (aOR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.5 to 5.8) were the prognostic factors that were associated with the highest risk of unsuccessful revascularizations. We found an S-shaped, nonlinear association between patient age and unsuccessful revascularizations and a U-shaped, nonlinear association between the amount of tissue loss before treatment and unsuccessful revascularizations. There was no evidence of an association between unsuccessful revascularizations and patient sex, smoking, or diabetes mellitus.

Conclusions: Injury details were the most significant prognostic factors of an unsuccessful upper-extremity revascularization, while age was the only patient characteristic that was associated with this outcome. In particular, total amputation type and avulsion and crush injury mechanisms yielded a higher risk of unsuccessful revascularization. We recommend considering this information when making decisions regarding the treatment of upper-extremity amputation injuries.

Level of evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background: Orthopaedic sports medicine is among the most popular subspecialties. Understanding the trends in sports medicine research over time can offer insight into progress and innovation within the field. The purpose of this study was to assess both the quality of the current literature and trends in gender diversity and inclusion by evaluating publishing characteristics of sports medicine studies in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume (JBJS-A) from 2007 to 2021.

Methods: Sports medicine studies in JBJS-A from 2007 to 2021 were identified using JBJS subspeciality tags for "sports medicine" articles and organized by study type, number of authors, sex of the authors, academic degree(s) of the first and last authors, level of evidence, country of publication, citations, and use of patient-reported outcomes (PROM).

Results: A total of 784 studies were reviewed, and 513 met inclusion criteria. Clinical therapeutic studies were the most common publication (48%). There was an increase in the publication of clinical prognostic studies (17%-25%, p = 0.037) and a significant increase in the use of PROM measures over time (13%-47%, p < 0.001). The total number of authors increased over the study period (4.8-6.3), but there was no significant increase in female authorship. Only 15% of the 784 studies included a female author, with an average of 0.8 female authors per article (range 0-8) compared with 4.6 males (range 1-14).

Conclusion: The significant increase in the use of PROMs in sports medicine studies indicates that the quality of research has improved over the 15-year period. The gender disparity in authorship has remained stagnant. Only 11% of all first authors and 9% of senior authors were female. The number of included international studies improved over time; however, the United States remains the most prolific publisher. Despite these areas of growth, this study suggests that there is room for improvement of authorship gender diversity in orthopaedic sports medicine research.

Level of evidence: Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background: Bone transport in distraction osteogenesis is an effective, well-known procedure. However, bone compression is an aspect of this technique for which there is no objective information. The lack of direct bone compression measurements may result in a lack of uniformity in the bone transport process, which can result in its ineffective application and may be contributing to its underutilization. This study describes the results of applying objectively measured compressions to achieve a distraction regeneration zone and docking site consolidation during bone transport in distraction osteogenesis.

Methods: This prospective study describes the results of a single cohort of 32 patients who underwent distraction osteogenesis with bone transport utilizing a combination of a minimally invasive rail plate and monolateral external fixation. The patients were categorized into 2 groups: (1) those with hypertrophic, atrophic, or infectious pseudarthrosis-nonunion (the pseudarthrosis-nonunion group), and (2) those with bone loss due to trauma or osteomyelitis (the bone loss group). The initial bone compression was measured during the latency phase, and the final compression was measured during the distraction phase. The healing index, external fixation index, healing time, consolidation time, and docking time were calculated for each patient. The Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for comparisons between and within groups.

Results: In this study, 28 (88%) of the patients were male. The mean patient age was 44.93 ± 16.21 years. The median values were 3.2 Nm for the initial compression and 3.4 Nm for the final compression, with no significant difference between or within groups of patients. The osseous results were excellent in 29 patients (91%), and the functional results were good or excellent in 31 patients (97%).

Conclusions: This study is the first to objectively measure compression in the bone transport process. Our findings showed that all patients who had an initial compression of ≥3.2 Nm achieved 100% consolidation of the distraction regeneration zone, and those who had a final compression of ≥2.9 Nm achieved complete docking site consolidation without complications. These 2 values thus represent effective compression and highlight the role of bone compression in bone transport.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background: The most common reason for lower-extremity amputations remains the management of complications of diabetes mellitus (DM) and/or peripheral vascular disease. Traditional socket prostheses remain the rehabilitation standard, although transcutaneous osseointegration for amputees (TOFA) is proving a viable alternative. Limited studies of TOFA for vascular amputees have been published, but no study has focused on TOFA for patients with DM, neglecting this important patient population. The primary aim of the present study exploring this potential care option was to report the frequencies and types of adverse events following TOFA for patients with well-controlled DM. The secondary aims were to report their mobility and quality-of-life changes.

Methods: A retrospective review was performed of 17 consecutive patients with well-controlled DM who had undergone unilateral transfemoral TOFA from 2013 to 2019 and had been followed for at least 2 years. Outcomes were perioperative complications, additional surgery (soft-tissue refashioning, debridement, implant removal, periprosthetic fracture treatment), mobility (daily prosthesis wear hours, K-level, Timed Up and Go Test, 6-Minute Walk Test), and patient-reported outcomes (Questionnaire for Persons with a Transfemoral Amputation, Short Form-36).

Results: There were no perioperative systemic complications, deaths, or proximal amputations. Two patients (12%) sustained a periprosthetic fracture following a fall, managed by internal fixation with implant retention, and regained independent ambulation. Eight patients (47%) had additional surgery or surgeries for non-traumatic complications: 4 (24%) had soft-tissue refashioning, 3 (18%) had debridement, and 3 others had implant removal with subsequent revision osseointegration for aseptic loosening (1) or infection (2). The proportion of patients wearing their prosthesis at least 8 hours daily improved from 5 (36%) to 11 (79%) of 14 (p = 0.054). The proportion of patients who achieved at least K-level 2 improved from 6% to 94% (p < 0.001). Other changes were not significant.

Conclusions: Contraindicating TOFA for all patients with DM seems draconian. Patients with well-controlled DM experienced significant mobility improvements, although additional surgery was somewhat common. Improvements in selection criteria or surgical technique to reduce risks are needed so that TOFA can be routinely considered for amputees with well-controlled DM.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background: The Finnish Shaft of the Humerus (FISH) trial compared open reduction and internal plate fixation (ORIF) with functional bracing in adult patients with displaced, closed humeral shaft fractures. Here, we compare the results of the patients in the randomized clinical trial (RCT [the randomized cohort]) with those of the cohort of patients who were also eligible but declined randomization (the nonrandomized cohort) to investigate if patients' treatment preference was associated with the outcomes during a 2-year follow-up.

Methods: A total of 321 patients were treated at 2 university hospitals in Finland between November 2012 and January 2018. Of the 140 eligible patients, 82 were randomized to ORIF or functional bracing. Of the 58 patients declining randomization, 42 consented to participate in a nonrandomized cohort in which the patients were able to choose the treatment method. The primary outcome of this study was the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score. Patients in the randomized cohort and the nonrandomized cohort were analyzed separately in 3 groups: those who had (1) initial surgery, (2) successful functional bracing, and (3) late surgery due to failed functional bracing. We used mixed-model, repeated-measures analysis of variance to compare the treatment effect among the 3 groups.

Results: In the randomized cohort, 38 patients had an initial surgical procedure. Of the 44 patients randomized to functional bracing, 30 (68%) healed successfully and 14 (32%) underwent a late surgical procedure. In the nonrandomized cohort, 9 patients preferred an initial surgical procedure. Of the 33 patients preferring functional bracing, 26 (79%) healed successfully and 7 (21%) underwent late surgery. The DASH scores in the randomized cohort and the nonrandomized cohort were 6.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3 to 11.4) and 12.3 (95% CI, 0.3 to 24.3) for the initial surgery groups, 6.0 (95% CI, 1.0 to 11.0) and 3.4 (95% CI, 0 to 9.3) for the bracing groups, and 17.5 (95% CI, 10.5 to 24.5) and 20.5 (95% CI, 9.4 to 31.6) for the late surgery groups at 2 years.

Conclusions: The results of the randomized cohort and the nonrandomized cohort were comparable and suggest that patients' treatment preferences are not associated with the treatment outcomes of these injuries.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background: Closed, unstable AO/OTA 44B2 ankle fractures are common injuries with similar distributions by age, sex, and race. The purpose of this study was to identify disparities in access to and utilization of surgical care for these injuries.

Methods: Ambulatory patients ≥18 years of age with capitated Medicaid health insurance who presented from January 2016 to February 2020 with an isolated, closed AO/OTA 44B2 ankle fracture with radiographic evidence of instability were retrospectively identified at 1 Level-I safety-net trauma center. Associations between patient characteristics (age, sex, preferred language, race, ethnicity, housing status, employment, and substance use) and measures of access to and utilization of ankle fracture surgery (days from injury to evaluation, being offered surgery, undergoing surgery, and days from evaluation to surgery) were investigated on bivariable and multivariable analysis.

Results: Of the 1,116 patients who were screened, 323 met the inclusion criteria. The included patients had a median age of 41 years; 207 patients (64%) were male and 255 (79%) were Hispanic. Patients presented at a mean of 4.6 ± 7.0 days from injury. Delayed presentation was associated with self-identification as Hispanic (rate ratio [RR], 1.93; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.17, 3.12]) and with marijuana use (RR, 1.59; 95% CI: 1.08, 2.36), whereas significantly earlier presentation was associated with a non-English language preference (RR, 0.64; 95% CI: 0.46, 0.89), alcohol abuse (RR, 0.74; 95% CI: 0.55, 0.99), and illicit drug use (RR, 0.30; 95% CI: 0.14, 0.67). Ankle fracture surgery was offered to 274 patients (85%). Experiencing homelessness was associated with a decreased likelihood of being offered surgery (odds ratio [OR], 0.15; 95% CI: 0.03, 0.69). Of patients who were offered surgery, 216 (79%) underwent surgery. Black patients underwent surgery significantly less frequently than patients who identified as White (OR, 0.14; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.77). The median time from evaluation to surgery was 11 days (interquartile range, 7 to 14 days). Patients who used illicit drugs experienced a mean delay to surgery of 6.0 days relative to those who did not use illicit drugs (mean time to surgery, 16.8 ± 7.1 and 10.8 ± 5.1 days, respectively).

Conclusions: We identified disparities in access to and utilization of surgical care for unstable AO/OTA 44B2 ankle fractures that negatively affected patients with Medicaid insurance who identified as Hispanic or Black, were experiencing homelessness, or used illicit drugs. These disparities may negatively affect outcomes for patients receiving care in similar environments, such as capitated health-care networks and public safety-net health systems.

Level of evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background: Both-bone forearm shaft fractures (BBFFs) in adults carry a significant risk of adverse events (AEs). Based on the current literature, there is considerable variance in AE incidence reporting. We aimed to systematically review the literature on BBFFs in adults treated with compression plate fixation, assessing AEs and long-term outcomes.

Methods: We performed a systematic review based on the PubMed database on the current literature on adult BBFFs treated with open reduction and internal fixation with compression plates. Two authors independently collected the data, and a third author resolved disagreements between the 2 reviewers. The primary outcome measure was postoperative AEs, whereas the secondary outcome was to review the long-term outcomes. We evaluated the methodological quality of the studies with a modified version of the Coleman Methodology Score.

Results: Fifteen studies (12 retrospective case series and 3 randomized controlled trials) met the set inclusion criteria. In total, there were 944 patients, of whom 24% (n = 224) experienced some AEs, and 14% had major AEs requiring secondary operations or remaining persistent. The most common AEs were postoperative nerve injuries (incidence 7%, n = 64/944) and fracture nonunion (incidence 5%, n = 45/944). Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores were available for 135 patients (5 studies), with a mean score of 12.5 (range 0-61). According to the modified Coleman Methodology Scores, there were 2 good-, 1 fair-, and 12 poor-quality studies among the included studies.

Conclusion: BBFF compression plate fixation in adults poses a relatively high AE risk (24%). According to available patient-reported outcomes and range of motion measurements, the average postoperative outcomes are good, although a minor disability typically persists to some extent. There is a need for high-quality prospective trials assessing the treatment and outcomes of BBFFs in adults to improve forearm fracture treatment.

Level of evidence: Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.