EJVES Vascular Forum最新文献

Introduction

Case report

Literature review

Conclusion

Introduction

Report

Discussion

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Introduction

Report

Discussion

Introduction

Report

Discussion

Fifteen to 20% of patients with an acute ischaemic stroke have a tandem lesion defined by the combination of an intracranial large vessel thrombo-embolic occlusion and a high grade stenosis or occlusion of the ipsilateral internal carotid artery. These patients tend to have worse outcomes than patients with isolated intracranial occlusions, with higher rates of disability and death. The introduction of endovascular thrombectomy to treat the intracranial lesion clearly improved the outcome compared with treatment with intravenous thrombolysis alone. However, the best treatment strategy for managing the extracranial carotid artery lesion in patients with tandem lesions remains unknown. Current guidelines recommend carotid endarterectomy for patients with transient ischaemic attack or non-disabling stroke and moderate or severe stenosis of the internal carotid artery, within two weeks of the initial event, to prevent major stroke recurrence and death. Alternatively, the symptomatic carotid artery could be treated by endovascular placement of a stent during endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). This would negate the need for a second procedure, immediately reduce the risk of stroke recurrence, increase patient satisfaction, and could be cost effective. However, the administration of dual antiplatelet therapy could potentially increase the risk of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage in patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Randomised controlled trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of immediate carotid artery stenting during EVT in acute stroke patients with tandem lesions are currently ongoing and will impact the current guidelines regarding the treatment of patients with acute ischaemic stroke due to these tandem lesions.

Objective

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a rare disorder mostly seen in younger individuals. Although patient wellbeing is relevantly impaired, it often takes a long time before the diagnosis is made. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is routinely used despite its radiation exposure, which is a major concern in this young patient population. Moreover, DSA offers limited opportunities for functional assessment. By contrast, ultrasonography is widely accessible without causing radiation exposure and allows for flexible functional assessment. The main goal of the study was to investigate whether ultrasound (US) was a viable alternative to DSA in diagnosing arterial TOS (aTOS).

Methods

Patients, referred to a tertiary centre for evaluation of suspected TOS, were recruited into the study. DSA was routinely performed with the patient's arms both in the raised (abducted) and neutral (adducted) position. Two vascular surgeons and two radiologists assessed the resulting images for the presence of aTOS. Additionally, two examiners performed US according to a standardised protocol. The reference for presence of aTOS was the DSA based interdisciplinary vascular conference consensus. Inter-rater agreement and latent class analysis (LCA) were performed between assessors and diagnostic methods.

Results

Fifty one consecutive patients (two thirds female) aged 39.3 ± 13.0 years were included within 11 months. US agreement was excellent at 0.94 (0.841–0.980), DSA agreement for vascular surgeons was good at 0.779 (0.479–1.000), whereas it was moderate at 0.546 (0.046–1.000) for radiologists. Results suggest that DSA is untenable as the gold standard for aTOS diagnosis. In LCA, US was shown to be a reliable diagnostic tool for the detection of aTOS.

Conclusion

US examination is a valid test for the detection of haemodynamically relevant compression of arteries in the diagnostic work up of aTOS using a standardised protocol. The role of DSA as the gold standard should be reviewed and needs to be reconsidered.