首页 > 最新文献

Evaluation Journal of Australasia最新文献

英文 中文
Population Health Challenges and Evaluative Thinking: Rapid Responses in the Time of COVID-19 人口健康挑战与评估思维:COVID-19时期的快速应对
Q2 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-05-16 DOI: 10.1177/1035719X231175884
K. D’Onise, Katherine Pontifex
There are multiple complex challenges that the population health sector faces to improve the health of the community, and the sector must work efficiently and effectively to make the most of the committed funds, sometimes in contexts of uncertainty. This article explores, through the case study of the South Australian COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Project, the application of pillars from the Lean Start-up model of setting a clear vision, and creation of a series of minimum viable products to enable work with the community to commence as quickly as possible. This article draws parallels between this corporate model and the notion of evaluative thinking as well as adaptive evaluation approaches, demonstrates the interest from population health program and policy actors in adaptive practices and proposes a continuing opportunity for the evaluation profession in this space.
人口卫生部门在改善社区健康方面面临着多重复杂的挑战,该部门必须高效有效地工作,以充分利用承诺的资金,有时是在不确定的情况下。本文通过南澳大利亚州新冠肺炎疫苗犹豫项目的案例研究,探讨了精益创业模式支柱的应用,即建立清晰的愿景,并创建一系列最低可行的产品,以使与社区的合作能够尽快开始。本文将这种企业模式与评估思维以及适应性评估方法的概念进行了比较,展示了人口健康计划和政策参与者对适应性实践的兴趣,并为评估行业在这一领域提供了持续的机会。
{"title":"Population Health Challenges and Evaluative Thinking: Rapid Responses in the Time of COVID-19","authors":"K. D’Onise, Katherine Pontifex","doi":"10.1177/1035719X231175884","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719X231175884","url":null,"abstract":"There are multiple complex challenges that the population health sector faces to improve the health of the community, and the sector must work efficiently and effectively to make the most of the committed funds, sometimes in contexts of uncertainty. This article explores, through the case study of the South Australian COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Project, the application of pillars from the Lean Start-up model of setting a clear vision, and creation of a series of minimum viable products to enable work with the community to commence as quickly as possible. This article draws parallels between this corporate model and the notion of evaluative thinking as well as adaptive evaluation approaches, demonstrates the interest from population health program and policy actors in adaptive practices and proposes a continuing opportunity for the evaluation profession in this space.","PeriodicalId":37231,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation Journal of Australasia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48000057","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An asset-based evaluation of a novel New Zealand rural health service 基于资产的新西兰新型农村卫生服务评估
Q2 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-05-11 DOI: 10.1177/1035719X231175874
Katie E McMenamin, J. McMenamin, A. Towers
This article describes the background behind the development of a novel evaluation approach of an Aotearoa New Zealand rural health service using an equity-focused, strengths-based approach to complement the traditional audit process. This approach avoids a deficit-based, gap-analysis of service shortcomings in favour of a strengths-based model through which services can draw on identified assets in planning future service initiatives. The approach discussed aims to identify and mobilise assets and strengths of people and services that promote quality outcomes, with a particular focus on those that address the deeply embedded health inequities for Māori (the indigenous people of Aotearoa). The asset model will be used to evaluate a rural service that is uniquely co-located with other health-related hospital services. This article aims to provide a commentary on the benefits of an asset-based approach to rural general practice evaluation.
本文描述了开发新西兰奥特亚农村卫生服务新评估方法的背景,该方法以公平为重点,以优势为基础,以补充传统的审计过程。这种方法避免了对服务缺陷进行基于赤字的差距分析,而支持基于优势的模式,通过这种模式,服务可以在规划未来服务举措时利用已确定的资产。所讨论的方法旨在确定和调动人员和服务的资产和优势,以促进高质量的成果,特别关注那些解决毛利人(奥特亚土著人民)根深蒂固的健康不平等问题的资产和力量。资产模型将用于评估与其他健康相关医院服务独特共处的农村服务。本文旨在对基于资产的农村全科医学评估方法的好处进行评论。
{"title":"An asset-based evaluation of a novel New Zealand rural health service","authors":"Katie E McMenamin, J. McMenamin, A. Towers","doi":"10.1177/1035719X231175874","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719X231175874","url":null,"abstract":"This article describes the background behind the development of a novel evaluation approach of an Aotearoa New Zealand rural health service using an equity-focused, strengths-based approach to complement the traditional audit process. This approach avoids a deficit-based, gap-analysis of service shortcomings in favour of a strengths-based model through which services can draw on identified assets in planning future service initiatives. The approach discussed aims to identify and mobilise assets and strengths of people and services that promote quality outcomes, with a particular focus on those that address the deeply embedded health inequities for Māori (the indigenous people of Aotearoa). The asset model will be used to evaluate a rural service that is uniquely co-located with other health-related hospital services. This article aims to provide a commentary on the benefits of an asset-based approach to rural general practice evaluation.","PeriodicalId":37231,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation Journal of Australasia","volume":"23 1","pages":"126 - 138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45762702","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Editorial June 2023 2023年6月社论
Q2 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-04-14 DOI: 10.1177/1035719x231168702
Jon Guenther
{"title":"Editorial June 2023","authors":"Jon Guenther","doi":"10.1177/1035719x231168702","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719x231168702","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37231,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation Journal of Australasia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42545608","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Practice of Evaluation: Partnership Approaches for Community Change 评估实践:社区变革的伙伴关系方法
Q2 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI: 10.1177/1035719x231164871
L. Curran
{"title":"The Practice of Evaluation: Partnership Approaches for Community Change","authors":"L. Curran","doi":"10.1177/1035719x231164871","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719x231164871","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37231,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation Journal of Australasia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48925192","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Procedural and participatory ethics: community-based evaluation in practice 程序和参与性伦理:实践中的社区评价
Q2 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-03-30 DOI: 10.1177/1035719X231166206
Tony O’Connor
This article argues that it can be beneficial for institution-based, procedural ethics review of evaluation design in the planning stage to be followed by community-based oversight of ethical issues in the field. Deferring to an institutional review board (IRB) for ethical assessment when a project is underway can be impractical for community-based projects that are designed to be responsive to local needs and interests, especially when community leaders expect to have a meaningful say in determining what is the right thing to do. This article discusses a 2-year project in New Zealand, where community leaders and the project funder formed a project steering group to, among other things, provide ethical oversight. Ethical issues that arose during the project and the steering group’s role in considering the most suitable response are discussed and linked to literature about participatory ethics.
本文认为,在规划阶段对评价设计进行基于制度的程序性伦理审查,然后对该领域的伦理问题进行基于社区的监督,可能是有益的。当一个项目正在进行时,对机构审查委员会(IRB)进行道德评估是不切实际的,因为以社区为基础的项目旨在满足当地的需求和利益,特别是当社区领导人希望在决定什么是正确的事情时有意义的发言权时。本文讨论了新西兰一个为期两年的项目,社区领导人和项目资助者组成了一个项目指导小组,除其他事项外,提供道德监督。讨论了项目期间出现的伦理问题以及指导小组在考虑最合适的回应方面的作用,并将其与有关参与性伦理的文献联系起来。
{"title":"Procedural and participatory ethics: community-based evaluation in practice","authors":"Tony O’Connor","doi":"10.1177/1035719X231166206","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719X231166206","url":null,"abstract":"This article argues that it can be beneficial for institution-based, procedural ethics review of evaluation design in the planning stage to be followed by community-based oversight of ethical issues in the field. Deferring to an institutional review board (IRB) for ethical assessment when a project is underway can be impractical for community-based projects that are designed to be responsive to local needs and interests, especially when community leaders expect to have a meaningful say in determining what is the right thing to do. This article discusses a 2-year project in New Zealand, where community leaders and the project funder formed a project steering group to, among other things, provide ethical oversight. Ethical issues that arose during the project and the steering group’s role in considering the most suitable response are discussed and linked to literature about participatory ethics.","PeriodicalId":37231,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation Journal of Australasia","volume":"23 1","pages":"91 - 100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43968560","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluative thinking 评估性思维
Q2 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-03-22 DOI: 10.1177/1035719X231163932
Michael J. Cole
Evaluative thinking is a core skill used by evaluators. It brings evaluation practice to a higher level of sophistication and utility and helps to ensure that evaluation findings, interpretations and recommendations are contextualised, evidence-based and practical. This article draws upon decades of the work of evaluators who have published on thinking critically and evaluatively. It identifies and explores the five primary elements of evaluative thinking – critical, contextual, creative, practical thinking and reflective practice – and offers a practical framework for examining and applying these elements of evaluative thinking. It also distinguishes evaluative thinking from evaluation planning and implementation, which it precedes and guides. Finally, it proposes that evaluative thinking should be examined and learned intentionally as a core evaluation skill just as, for example, various methodologies or methods of analysis are taught.
评估思维是评估者使用的核心技能。它使评估实践达到更高的复杂性和实用性,并有助于确保评估结果、解释和建议符合背景、循证和实用性。这篇文章借鉴了评估者几十年来的工作,他们发表了关于批判性思维和评估性思维的文章。它确定并探索了评价思维的五个主要要素——批判性、情境性、创造性、实践性思维和反思性实践——并为研究和应用这些评价思维要素提供了一个实用的框架。它还将评价思维与评价规划和实施区分开来,后者是评价思维的先导和指导。最后,它提出,评估思维应该作为一种核心评估技能进行有意的检查和学习,就像教授各种方法或分析方法一样。
{"title":"Evaluative thinking","authors":"Michael J. Cole","doi":"10.1177/1035719X231163932","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719X231163932","url":null,"abstract":"Evaluative thinking is a core skill used by evaluators. It brings evaluation practice to a higher level of sophistication and utility and helps to ensure that evaluation findings, interpretations and recommendations are contextualised, evidence-based and practical. This article draws upon decades of the work of evaluators who have published on thinking critically and evaluatively. It identifies and explores the five primary elements of evaluative thinking – critical, contextual, creative, practical thinking and reflective practice – and offers a practical framework for examining and applying these elements of evaluative thinking. It also distinguishes evaluative thinking from evaluation planning and implementation, which it precedes and guides. Finally, it proposes that evaluative thinking should be examined and learned intentionally as a core evaluation skill just as, for example, various methodologies or methods of analysis are taught.","PeriodicalId":37231,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation Journal of Australasia","volume":"23 1","pages":"70 - 90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41369581","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
An interview with an emerging evaluator – Amanda Mottershead 采访一位新兴的评估员——阿曼达·莫特谢德
Q2 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-03-10 DOI: 10.1177/1035719x231161899
A. Rutter
The ‘ Evaluator Perspective ’ series cover a range of perspectives from evaluators working in the indigenous area; evaluators with a long career in evaluation; or evaluators experienced in a certain methodology. This particular perspective is that of
“评估者视角”系列涵盖了在土著地区工作的评估者的一系列视角;长期从事评估工作的评估人员;或者对某种方法有经验的评估人员。这个特殊的观点是
{"title":"An interview with an emerging evaluator – Amanda Mottershead","authors":"A. Rutter","doi":"10.1177/1035719x231161899","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719x231161899","url":null,"abstract":"The ‘ Evaluator Perspective ’ series cover a range of perspectives from evaluators working in the indigenous area; evaluators with a long career in evaluation; or evaluators experienced in a certain methodology. This particular perspective is that of","PeriodicalId":37231,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation Journal of Australasia","volume":"23 1","pages":"163 - 166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46669148","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A comparative case study illustrating the influence of a system perspective on the outcome evaluation of simple versus complex interventions 一个比较案例研究,说明系统视角对简单干预与复杂干预结果评估的影响
Q2 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI: 10.1177/1035719X231160584
R. Renger, Jessica Renger, Richard N. Van Eck, M. Basson, Jirina Renger
When evaluating the effectiveness of an intervention, the evaluation approach must match the intervention complexity, ensuring that the chosen evaluation is “fit for purpose.” For simple interventions, evaluating short-, mid-, and long-term outcomes is appropriate. However, for complex interventions, an additional outcome that must be considered is the essential system property that emerges as a result of the interaction of interdependent intervention components. By focusing on the emergent system property, evaluators are better able to assess the holistic effectiveness of a complex intervention. This article illustrates this principle through a comparative case study of a simple intervention and a complex intervention within a National Institute of Health (NIH) funded Clinical Translational Research center. The analysis illustrates that a more effective and appropriate evaluation results when a complex intervention, deemed to be operating and functioning as a system, is evaluated as a system than could have been achieved by treating each component as independent and evaluating the short-, mid-, or long-term outcomes of each component.
在评估干预措施的有效性时,评估方法必须与干预措施的复杂性相匹配,确保所选评估“符合目的”。对于简单的干预措施,评估短期、中期和长期结果是合适的。然而,对于复杂的干预措施,必须考虑的另一个结果是由于相互依存的干预组成部分的相互作用而产生的基本系统属性。通过关注紧急系统属性,评估人员能够更好地评估复杂干预的整体有效性。本文通过在美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)资助的临床转化研究中心内进行的简单干预和复杂干预的比较案例研究来说明这一原则。分析表明,当一个被视为作为一个系统运行和运作的复杂干预措施被作为一个体系进行评估时,比将每个组成部分视为独立的并评估每个组成部分的短期、中期或长期结果所能实现的评估结果更有效、更适当。
{"title":"A comparative case study illustrating the influence of a system perspective on the outcome evaluation of simple versus complex interventions","authors":"R. Renger, Jessica Renger, Richard N. Van Eck, M. Basson, Jirina Renger","doi":"10.1177/1035719X231160584","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719X231160584","url":null,"abstract":"When evaluating the effectiveness of an intervention, the evaluation approach must match the intervention complexity, ensuring that the chosen evaluation is “fit for purpose.” For simple interventions, evaluating short-, mid-, and long-term outcomes is appropriate. However, for complex interventions, an additional outcome that must be considered is the essential system property that emerges as a result of the interaction of interdependent intervention components. By focusing on the emergent system property, evaluators are better able to assess the holistic effectiveness of a complex intervention. This article illustrates this principle through a comparative case study of a simple intervention and a complex intervention within a National Institute of Health (NIH) funded Clinical Translational Research center. The analysis illustrates that a more effective and appropriate evaluation results when a complex intervention, deemed to be operating and functioning as a system, is evaluated as a system than could have been achieved by treating each component as independent and evaluating the short-, mid-, or long-term outcomes of each component.","PeriodicalId":37231,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation Journal of Australasia","volume":"23 1","pages":"101 - 110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45653594","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Developmental evaluation during the COVID-19 pandemic: Practice-based learnings from projects in British Columbia, Canada. COVID-19 大流行期间的发展评估:从加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的项目中汲取的实践经验。
Q2 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-03-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-13 DOI: 10.1177/1035719X221119841
Ihoghosa Iyamu, Mai Berger, Saranee Fernando, M Elizabeth Snow, Amy Salmon

In this article, we explore experiences and learnings from adapting to challenges encountered in implementing three Developmental Evaluations (DE) in British Columbia, Canada within the evolving context of the COVID-19 pandemic. We situate our DE projects within our approach to the DE life cycle and describe challenges encountered and required adaptations in each phase of the life cycle. Regarding foundational aspects of DEs, we experienced challenges with relationship building, assessing and responding to the context, and ensuring continuous learning. These challenges were related to suboptimal embeddedness of the evaluators within the evaluated projects. We adapted by leveraging online channels to maintain communications and securing stakeholder engagement by assuming non-traditional DE roles based on our knowledge of the context to support project goals. Additional challenges experienced with mapping the rationale and goals of the projects, identifying domains for assessment, collecting data, making sense of the data and intervening were adapted to by facilitating online workshops, collecting data online and through proxy evaluators, while sharing methodological insights within the evaluation team. During evolving crises, like the COVID-19 pandemic, evaluators must embrace flexibility, leverage, and apply their knowledge of the evaluation context, lean on their strengths, purposefully reflect and share knowledge to optimise their DEs.

在本文中,我们探讨了在 COVID-19 大流行不断发展的背景下,加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省实施三项发展评估(DE)过程中应对挑战的经验和教训。我们将发展性评价项目置于我们的发展性评价生命周期方法中,并描述了在生命周期的每个阶段遇到的挑战和需要做出的调整。关于可持续发展教育的基础方面,我们在建立关系、评估和应对环境以及确保持续学习方面遇到了挑战。这些挑战与评估人员在被评估项目中的嵌入程度不够理想有关。为此,我们利用在线渠道保持沟通,并根据我们对环境的了解,通过承担非传统的可持续发展教育角色来确保利益相关者的参与,从而支持项目目标的实现。通过促进在线研讨会、在线收集数据和通过代理评估员收集数据,同时在评估小组内分享方法上的见解,来适应在规划项目的基本原理和目标、确定评估领域、收集数据、理解数据和干预方面遇到的其他挑战。在不断变化的危机中,如 COVID-19 大流行病,评估人员必须具有灵活性,利用和运用他们对评 估背景的知识,发挥他们的优势,有目的地进行反思和分享知识,以优化他们的 DEs。
{"title":"Developmental evaluation during the COVID-19 pandemic: Practice-based learnings from projects in British Columbia, Canada.","authors":"Ihoghosa Iyamu, Mai Berger, Saranee Fernando, M Elizabeth Snow, Amy Salmon","doi":"10.1177/1035719X221119841","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1035719X221119841","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this article, we explore experiences and learnings from adapting to challenges encountered in implementing three Developmental Evaluations (DE) in British Columbia, Canada within the evolving context of the COVID-19 pandemic. We situate our DE projects within our approach to the DE life cycle and describe challenges encountered and required adaptations in each phase of the life cycle. Regarding foundational aspects of DEs, we experienced challenges with relationship building, assessing and responding to the context, and ensuring continuous learning. These challenges were related to suboptimal embeddedness of the evaluators within the evaluated projects. We adapted by leveraging online channels to maintain communications and securing stakeholder engagement by assuming non-traditional DE roles based on our knowledge of the context to support project goals. Additional challenges experienced with mapping the rationale and goals of the projects, identifying domains for assessment, collecting data, making sense of the data and intervening were adapted to by facilitating online workshops, collecting data online and through proxy evaluators, while sharing methodological insights within the evaluation team. During evolving crises, like the COVID-19 pandemic, evaluators must embrace flexibility, leverage, and apply their knowledge of the evaluation context, lean on their strengths, purposefully reflect and share knowledge to optimise their DEs.</p>","PeriodicalId":37231,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation Journal of Australasia","volume":"23 1","pages":"23-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9379587/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"65871859","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reflections on COVID-19 and internal evaluation in a humanitarian non-profit. 对COVID-19的思考和人道主义非营利组织的内部评估
Q2 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-03-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-27 DOI: 10.1177/1035719X221109310
Leanne M Kelly

This article uses reflective practice and social interdependence theory to unpack the ways in which our practice as internal evaluators was impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, using the development of a monitoring and evaluation framework as a case study. The reflections are separated into six stages: description, feelings, evaluation, analysis, conclusion and action plan. Initial reflections on the impact of COVID-19 drew out the negative effects of the pandemic and associated restrictions, which limited our ability to build rapport and stretched our capacity to balance work and home commitments. Deeper investigation revealed that the disaster pushed us to develop new ways of working that will augment and improve our future efforts. We foresee that these learnings will enable a future with greater ability to offer hybrid online/face-to-face collaborative opportunities that will enhance inclusion and active participation, thereby promoting monitoring and evaluation with greater collective ownership and relevance to a wider audience.

本文利用反思实践和社会相互依存理论,以监测和评估框架的发展为案例研究,揭示了我们作为内部评估者的实践受到新冠肺炎疫情影响的方式。反思分为六个阶段:描述、感受、评价、分析、结论和行动计划。对新冠肺炎影响的初步思考引出了疫情和相关限制的负面影响,这限制了我们建立融洽关系的能力,并拉伸了我们平衡工作和家庭承诺的能力。更深入的调查显示,这场灾难促使我们发展新的工作方式,这将加强和改进我们未来的努力。我们预计,这些学习将使未来更有能力提供在线/面对面的混合合作机会,从而增强包容性和积极参与,从而促进具有更大集体所有权和更广泛受众相关性的监测和评估。
{"title":"Reflections on COVID-19 and internal evaluation in a humanitarian non-profit.","authors":"Leanne M Kelly","doi":"10.1177/1035719X221109310","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1035719X221109310","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article uses reflective practice and social interdependence theory to unpack the ways in which our practice as internal evaluators was impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, using the development of a monitoring and evaluation framework as a case study. The reflections are separated into six stages: description, feelings, evaluation, analysis, conclusion and action plan. Initial reflections on the impact of COVID-19 drew out the negative effects of the pandemic and associated restrictions, which limited our ability to build rapport and stretched our capacity to balance work and home commitments. Deeper investigation revealed that the disaster pushed us to develop new ways of working that will augment and improve our future efforts. We foresee that these learnings will enable a future with greater ability to offer hybrid online/face-to-face collaborative opportunities that will enhance inclusion and active participation, thereby promoting monitoring and evaluation with greater collective ownership and relevance to a wider audience.</p>","PeriodicalId":37231,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation Journal of Australasia","volume":"23 1","pages":"40-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9237647/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48802163","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Evaluation Journal of Australasia
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1