Evaluation Journal of Australasia最新文献

英文中文

Editorial 编辑

Q2 Social Sciences

Evaluation Journal of Australasia

Pub Date : 2022-08-22 DOI: 10.1177/1035719X221121399

M. Forbes

引用次数: 0

Course enhancement conversations: A holistic and collaborative evaluation approach to quality improvement in higher education 课程改进对话：提高高等教育质量的整体合作评估方法

Q2 Social Sciences

Evaluation Journal of Australasia

Pub Date : 2022-08-11 DOI: 10.1177/1035719X221120295

Melissa Forbes, A. Murphy, Lyn Alderman

This practice article describes the use of collaborative evaluation for institutional improvement leading to continuous learning at a regional university in Australia. The University of Southern Queensland’s Academic Quality Framework (2019–2022) was developed in response to external drivers to improve practices relating to the comprehensive and systematic analysis of academic data. One aspect of the response was to introduce ‘course enhancement conversations’, which were a collaboration between the central Academic Quality Unit and academic staff, including course teams and learning and teaching leaders within schools and faculties. A feature of these conversations was the use of sentinel rather than performance indicators of course (not teaching) quality to prompt the holding of conversations. Conversations were conducted in a spirit of constructive collaboration, where the shared goal was to support course teams to deliver an outstanding student experience. Through adopting a collaborative approach to evaluation, Academic Quality Unit staff were evaluation champions who gradually acculturated academic staff and learning and teaching leaders to evaluative thinking and data-informed decision-making. Issues brought to light during these conversations have informed changes in practice at the university level, including the development of a new evaluation procedure to embed best-practice monitoring and evaluation across all levels of curriculum delivery.

这篇实践文章描述了在澳大利亚一所地区大学使用合作评估来改善制度，从而实现持续学习。南昆士兰大学的学术质量框架（2019-2022）是为了应对外部驱动因素而制定的，以改进与全面系统分析学术数据相关的实践。回应的一个方面是引入“课程改进对话”，这是中央学术质量股与学术人员的合作，包括课程团队以及学校和院系内的学习和教学领导。这些对话的一个特点是使用哨兵而不是课程（而非教学）质量的绩效指标来促进对话的进行。对话是本着建设性合作的精神进行的，共同目标是支持课程团队提供卓越的学生体验。通过采用合作评估方法，学术质量股的工作人员是评估的拥护者，他们逐渐使学术人员、学习和教学领导者适应评估思维和基于数据的决策。在这些对话中暴露出来的问题为大学一级的实践变化提供了信息，包括制定新的评估程序，将最佳实践监测和评估纳入各级课程实施。

{"title":"Course enhancement conversations: A holistic and collaborative evaluation approach to quality improvement in higher education","authors":"Melissa Forbes, A. Murphy, Lyn Alderman","doi":"10.1177/1035719X221120295","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719X221120295","url":null,"abstract":"This practice article describes the use of collaborative evaluation for institutional improvement leading to continuous learning at a regional university in Australia. The University of Southern Queensland’s Academic Quality Framework (2019–2022) was developed in response to external drivers to improve practices relating to the comprehensive and systematic analysis of academic data. One aspect of the response was to introduce ‘course enhancement conversations’, which were a collaboration between the central Academic Quality Unit and academic staff, including course teams and learning and teaching leaders within schools and faculties. A feature of these conversations was the use of sentinel rather than performance indicators of course (not teaching) quality to prompt the holding of conversations. Conversations were conducted in a spirit of constructive collaboration, where the shared goal was to support course teams to deliver an outstanding student experience. Through adopting a collaborative approach to evaluation, Academic Quality Unit staff were evaluation champions who gradually acculturated academic staff and learning and teaching leaders to evaluative thinking and data-informed decision-making. Issues brought to light during these conversations have informed changes in practice at the university level, including the development of a new evaluation procedure to embed best-practice monitoring and evaluation across all levels of curriculum delivery.","PeriodicalId":37231,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation Journal of Australasia","volume":"22 1","pages":"221 - 236"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45929418","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Design roadmapping: Guidebook for future foresight techniques 设计路线图:未来预见技术指南

Q2 Social Sciences

Evaluation Journal of Australasia

Pub Date : 2022-08-10 DOI: 10.1177/1035719X221120296

Emily Montgomery

引用次数: 5

Critical appraisal of the establishment of a theory-informed evaluation capacity building function in a large government department 批判性评价在大型政府部门中建立了理论指导的评价能力建设功能

Q2 Social Sciences

Evaluation Journal of Australasia

Pub Date : 2022-06-21 DOI: 10.1177/1035719X221109311

D. Lloyd, Eleanor B. Williams, Desiree Terrill

Evaluation Capacity Building (ECB) is a critical function that can increase uptake, quality and impact of evaluation activity in large organisations. This article describes how ECB theory has been applied in the design and implementation of foundational evaluation training in a large state government department. Appraisal of the first three years (2018–21) establishing the training component of the capacity building function is explored, in light of contemporary capacity building literature. Post-training feedback indicated high degree of participant satisfaction and met need among department staff. One-year follow-up of training workshops indicated that over two-thirds of respondents (68 percent) found evaluation training had a lasting impact on their work, and that participants continued to use evaluation support materials and apply what they had learned. The article provides practical information on this theory-informed approach, to support others who are commencing or delivering evaluation capacity initiatives within public sector agencies or other large organisations, including for those who are adapting training for online delivery during COVID-19. The article identifies lessons learned, including through the experience of moving training online during the COVID-19 pandemic, and presents opportunities to increase the impact of evaluation capacity building.

评估能力建设（ECB）是一项关键职能，可以提高大型组织评估活动的接受率、质量和影响力。本文描述了ECB理论如何应用于大型州政府部门基础评估培训的设计和实施。根据当代能力建设文献，探讨了建立能力建设职能培训组成部分的前三年（2018-21年）的评估。培训后的反馈表明，参与者的满意度很高，满足了部门工作人员的需求。培训讲习班的一年后续行动表明，超过三分之二的受访者（68%）发现评估培训对他们的工作产生了持久的影响，参与者继续使用评估支持材料并应用他们所学到的知识。这篇文章提供了关于这种理论知情方法的实用信息，以支持其他在公共部门机构或其他大型组织内开始或实施评估能力举措的人，包括那些在新冠肺炎期间调整在线交付培训的人。文章总结了经验教训，包括在新冠肺炎大流行期间将培训转移到网上的经验，并提供了增加评估能力建设影响的机会。

{"title":"Critical appraisal of the establishment of a theory-informed evaluation capacity building function in a large government department","authors":"D. Lloyd, Eleanor B. Williams, Desiree Terrill","doi":"10.1177/1035719X221109311","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719X221109311","url":null,"abstract":"Evaluation Capacity Building (ECB) is a critical function that can increase uptake, quality and impact of evaluation activity in large organisations. This article describes how ECB theory has been applied in the design and implementation of foundational evaluation training in a large state government department. Appraisal of the first three years (2018–21) establishing the training component of the capacity building function is explored, in light of contemporary capacity building literature. Post-training feedback indicated high degree of participant satisfaction and met need among department staff. One-year follow-up of training workshops indicated that over two-thirds of respondents (68 percent) found evaluation training had a lasting impact on their work, and that participants continued to use evaluation support materials and apply what they had learned. The article provides practical information on this theory-informed approach, to support others who are commencing or delivering evaluation capacity initiatives within public sector agencies or other large organisations, including for those who are adapting training for online delivery during COVID-19. The article identifies lessons learned, including through the experience of moving training online during the COVID-19 pandemic, and presents opportunities to increase the impact of evaluation capacity building.","PeriodicalId":37231,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation Journal of Australasia","volume":"22 1","pages":"142 - 156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43205287","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Lessons learned in evaluating system interdependencies using qualitative methods. 使用定性方法评估系统相互依存性的经验教训。

Q2 Social Sciences

Evaluation Journal of Australasia

Pub Date : 2022-06-01 Epub Date: 2022-02-14 DOI: 10.1177/1035719x211066961

Eric Souvannasacd, Heather Engblom, Richard N Van Eck, Ralph Renger, Marc Basson

This article shares lessons learned while evaluating the system interdependencies for a clinical and translational research centre (CTR). It explores the methodological challenge of discussing system concepts (e.g., cascading failures, feedback loops, and reflex arcs) with layperson participants during evaluation interviews. The article discusses the iterative process of moving from structured interview approaches in favor of an open narrative approach for data collection and lessons learned.

本文分享了在评估一个临床和转化研究中心（CTR）的系统相互依存关系时获得的经验教训。文章探讨了在评估访谈中与外行参与者讨论系统概念（如级联故障、反馈回路和反射弧）所面临的方法论挑战。文章讨论了从结构化访谈方法转向开放式叙事方法以收集数据和吸取经验教训的迭代过程。

引用次数: 0

Evaluating a peer-led wellbeing programme for doctors-in-training during the COVID-19 pandemic in Victoria, Australia, using the Most Significant Change technique. 使用最显著变化技术评估澳大利亚维多利亚州新冠肺炎大流行期间接受培训的医生的同行健康计划

Q2 Social Sciences

Evaluation Journal of Australasia

Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI: 10.1177/1035719X221080576

Karen Crinall, Madeleine Ward, Rebecca McDonald, William Crinall, James Aridas, Daniel L Rolnik

This article discusses the use of the Most Significant Change (MSC) technique in a mixed-methods evaluation of a pilot wellbeing programme for obstetrics and gynaecology doctors-in-training introduced at a large public hospital during Melbourne, Australia's second coronavirus (COVID-19) lockdown, which occurred from 7 July to 26 October 2020. The evaluation was conducted remotely using videoconferencing technology, to conform with pandemic restrictions. MSC complemented the program's participatory principles and was chosen because it seeks to learn about participants' perceptions of programme impacts by evaluating their stories of significant change. Stakeholders select one story exemplifying the most significant change resulting from the evaluated program. Inductive thematic analysis of all stories is combined with reasons for making the selection, to inform learnings (Dart & Davies, 2003; Tonkin et al., 2021). Nine stories of change were included in the selection. The most significant change was a more supportive workplace culture brought about by enabling basic needs to be met and breaking down hierarchical barriers. This was linked to five interconnected themes - connection, caring, communication, confidence and cooperation. The evaluation learnings are explored and reflections on remotely conducting MSC evaluation are shared.

本文讨论了在2020年7月7日至10月26日澳大利亚第二次冠状病毒（新冠肺炎）封锁期间，在墨尔本一家大型公立医院引入的妇产科医生培训试点福利计划的混合方法评估中最显著变化（MSC）技术的使用。评估是使用视频会议技术远程进行的，以符合疫情限制。MSC补充了该计划的参与原则，之所以被选中，是因为它试图通过评估参与者的重大变化故事来了解他们对计划影响的看法。利益相关者选择一个故事来举例说明评估项目产生的最重大的变化。对所有故事的归纳主题分析与选择的原因相结合，为学习提供信息（Dart&Davies，2003；Tonkin等人，2021）。九个关于变化的故事入选。最重要的变化是通过满足基本需求和打破等级壁垒，形成了一种更具支持性的工作场所文化。这与五个相互关联的主题有关——联系、关爱、沟通、信心和合作。对评估经验进行了探索，并分享了对远程进行MSC评估的思考。

{"title":"Evaluating a peer-led wellbeing programme for doctors-in-training during the COVID-19 pandemic in Victoria, Australia, using the Most Significant Change technique.","authors":"Karen Crinall, Madeleine Ward, Rebecca McDonald, William Crinall, James Aridas, Daniel L Rolnik","doi":"10.1177/1035719X221080576","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1035719X221080576","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article discusses the use of the Most Significant Change (MSC) technique in a mixed-methods evaluation of a pilot wellbeing programme for obstetrics and gynaecology doctors-in-training introduced at a large public hospital during Melbourne, Australia's second coronavirus (COVID-19) lockdown, which occurred from 7 July to 26 October 2020. The evaluation was conducted remotely using videoconferencing technology, to conform with pandemic restrictions. MSC complemented the program's participatory principles and was chosen because it seeks to learn about participants' perceptions of programme impacts by evaluating their stories of significant change. Stakeholders select one story exemplifying the most significant change resulting from the evaluated program. Inductive thematic analysis of all stories is combined with reasons for making the selection, to inform learnings (Dart & Davies, 2003; Tonkin et al., 2021). Nine stories of change were included in the selection. The most significant change was a more supportive workplace culture brought about by enabling basic needs to be met and breaking down hierarchical barriers. This was linked to five interconnected themes - connection, caring, communication, confidence and cooperation. The evaluation learnings are explored and reflections on remotely conducting MSC evaluation are shared.</p>","PeriodicalId":37231,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation Journal of Australasia","volume":"22 1","pages":"90-107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8961201/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46990821","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Suicide story: An evaluation of ‘tackling suicide Our Way’ 自杀故事:对“以我们的方式处理自杀”的评价

Q2 Social Sciences

Evaluation Journal of Australasia

Pub Date : 2022-05-23 DOI: 10.1177/1035719X221104841

J. Guenther, M. Roberts, Keith Buzzacott, Danielle Dyall

Despite concerted efforts to improve strategic responses to suicide, it remains a major concern in Australia. Among Indigenous communities the rates of suicide are up to three times higher than among non-Indigenous communities. Indigenous males are three times as likely to suicide than Indigenous females. The death rates for the Northern Territory are second highest in Australia, at 27.4 deaths per 100,000 population. In the Northern Territory, a program called Suicide Story is working to empower Indigenous people, creating a language to talk about suicide, and giving them tools to respond to the warning signs of suicide. The program was developed by Indigenous people and is run by Indigenous people in response to community needs. This paper draws from an evaluation of the program conducted in the Northern Territory at its 10-year mark, in 2018. Although it is impossible to assess how many lives have been saved, this paper takes a position that resilience is an indicator of prevention. One way to achieving this is through culturally safe processes. Based on the evaluation findings, we consider what that means for Suicide Story and other culturally safe suicide prevention programs designed with and for Indigenous people in Australia.

尽管人们齐心协力改善对自杀的战略反应，但这仍然是澳大利亚的一个主要问题。土著社区的自杀率比非土著社区高出三倍。土著男性自杀的可能性是土著女性的三倍。北领地的死亡率在澳大利亚排名第二，每10万人中有27.4人死亡。在北领地，一个名为“自杀故事”的项目正在努力赋予土著人民权力，创造一种谈论自杀的语言，并为他们提供应对自杀警告信号的工具。该方案由土著人民制定，并由土著人民根据社区需要管理。本文借鉴了2018年在北领地进行的该计划10周年评估。尽管不可能评估有多少生命得到了挽救，但本文的立场是，恢复力是预防的一个指标。实现这一目标的一种方法是通过文化安全的过程。根据评估结果，我们考虑这对自杀故事和其他文化上安全的自杀预防项目意味着什么，这些项目是为澳大利亚土著人民设计的。

{"title":"Suicide story: An evaluation of ‘tackling suicide Our Way’","authors":"J. Guenther, M. Roberts, Keith Buzzacott, Danielle Dyall","doi":"10.1177/1035719X221104841","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719X221104841","url":null,"abstract":"Despite concerted efforts to improve strategic responses to suicide, it remains a major concern in Australia. Among Indigenous communities the rates of suicide are up to three times higher than among non-Indigenous communities. Indigenous males are three times as likely to suicide than Indigenous females. The death rates for the Northern Territory are second highest in Australia, at 27.4 deaths per 100,000 population. In the Northern Territory, a program called Suicide Story is working to empower Indigenous people, creating a language to talk about suicide, and giving them tools to respond to the warning signs of suicide. The program was developed by Indigenous people and is run by Indigenous people in response to community needs. This paper draws from an evaluation of the program conducted in the Northern Territory at its 10-year mark, in 2018. Although it is impossible to assess how many lives have been saved, this paper takes a position that resilience is an indicator of prevention. One way to achieving this is through culturally safe processes. Based on the evaluation findings, we consider what that means for Suicide Story and other culturally safe suicide prevention programs designed with and for Indigenous people in Australia.","PeriodicalId":37231,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation Journal of Australasia","volume":"22 1","pages":"157 - 172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43695609","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Assessing achievements in place-based initiatives – developing a tailor-made tool 评估基于地方的举措的成就——开发量身定制的工具

Q2 Social Sciences

Evaluation Journal of Australasia

Pub Date : 2022-05-22 DOI: 10.1177/1035719X221102278

P. O’Connor, E. Clune, T. Marriner, Shantanu Sheshgir, J. Waddell

Assessing achievements of place-based initiatives (PBIs) has become increasingly important in contemporary evaluation practice. While key characteristics of successful PBIs have been described in the literature, the practicalities of assessing implementation progress across multiple PBIs under the umbrella of a single program invoke complex challenges. This article presents the process used to develop a tool for assessing implementation progress across a 14-site PBI aimed at improving health and education outcomes for First Nations children in Australia. Sites included a mix of metropolitan, regional, remote and very remote locations around Australia and varying levels of PBI maturity. A literature scan identified the attributes of successful PBIs and indicators/measures that could be used to evaluate them. These attributes were condensed into eight domains, and a further two were added due to their importance for this evaluation. The identified indicators and measures were mapped against these domains to generate a question bank. A process of consistently rating sites against the measures relevant to each of them enabled the identification of achievements within each site, comparisons between sites and evaluation of the progress of the program overall. The development of this tool provides a case study for developing a practical, fit-for-purpose tool to evaluate PBIs.

在当代评估实践中，评估基于地方的倡议(pbi)的成果变得越来越重要。虽然文献中已经描述了成功的pbi的关键特征，但在单一项目的保护伞下评估多个pbi实施进展的实用性引发了复杂的挑战。本文介绍了开发一种工具的过程，该工具用于评估旨在改善澳大利亚第一民族儿童健康和教育成果的14个地点PBI的实施进展。地点包括澳大利亚各地的大都市、地区、偏远地区和非常偏远地区，以及不同程度的PBI成熟度。文献扫描确定了成功的pbi的属性和可用于评估它们的指标/措施。这些属性被浓缩为8个领域，由于它们对本次评估的重要性，还增加了另外两个领域。将确定的指标和措施映射到这些域以生成题库。根据与每个站点相关的措施对站点进行持续评级的过程能够确定每个站点内的成就，站点之间的比较以及总体方案进展的评估。该工具的开发为开发实用的、适合目的的评估pbi工具提供了一个案例研究。

{"title":"Assessing achievements in place-based initiatives – developing a tailor-made tool","authors":"P. O’Connor, E. Clune, T. Marriner, Shantanu Sheshgir, J. Waddell","doi":"10.1177/1035719X221102278","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719X221102278","url":null,"abstract":"Assessing achievements of place-based initiatives (PBIs) has become increasingly important in contemporary evaluation practice. While key characteristics of successful PBIs have been described in the literature, the practicalities of assessing implementation progress across multiple PBIs under the umbrella of a single program invoke complex challenges. This article presents the process used to develop a tool for assessing implementation progress across a 14-site PBI aimed at improving health and education outcomes for First Nations children in Australia. Sites included a mix of metropolitan, regional, remote and very remote locations around Australia and varying levels of PBI maturity. A literature scan identified the attributes of successful PBIs and indicators/measures that could be used to evaluate them. These attributes were condensed into eight domains, and a further two were added due to their importance for this evaluation. The identified indicators and measures were mapped against these domains to generate a question bank. A process of consistently rating sites against the measures relevant to each of them enabled the identification of achievements within each site, comparisons between sites and evaluation of the progress of the program overall. The development of this tool provides a case study for developing a practical, fit-for-purpose tool to evaluate PBIs.","PeriodicalId":37231,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation Journal of Australasia","volume":"22 1","pages":"173 - 192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43328797","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Creating space for gut feelings in the diagnosis of cancer in primary care. 在基层医疗机构诊断癌症时为直觉创造空间。

IF 5.3 Q2 Social Sciences

Evaluation Journal of Australasia

Pub Date : 2022-04-28 Print Date: 2022-05-01 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp22X719249

Claire Friedemann Smith, Brian D Nicholson

引用次数: 0

Book Review: Evaluation in Today’s world: Respecting diversity, improving quality, and promoting usability 书评:当今世界的评价:尊重多样性，提高质量，促进可用性

Q2 Social Sciences

Evaluation Journal of Australasia

Pub Date : 2022-04-17 DOI: 10.1177/1035719x221088344

Charlotte Tulloch

引用次数: 10

首页上一页

下一页尾页

类型

全部化学•材料生命科学医学物理工程技术环境•农林材料科学地球科学法学管理学化学环境科学与生态学计算机科学教育学经济学农林科学人文科学生物学数学物理与天体物理心理学综合性期刊其他工业工程理学历史学农学文学信息工程

数据库

全部 ACS Publications Elsevier ieeexplore Springer The Royal Society of Chemistry Wiley

期刊

Evaluation Journal of Australasia

全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.

﹀