Pub Date : 2024-04-01Epub Date: 2024-04-08DOI: 10.5863/1551-6776-29.2.175
Alexis Hamelink, Joshua Elder, Kyle Harwood
Objective: Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (GCSF) products are often used in pediatric patients with malignant diagnoses to reduce the time that the patient is neutropenic. Long-acting GCSF products have been shown to be non-inferior to daily dosing of GCSF products, and are becoming more desired by patients and families. Insurance companies often require a prior authorization prior to approving the use of the long-acting GCSF products. This process has proven challenging leading to treatment delays and missed doses. The purpose of this study is to evaluate a quality improvement process for the prescribing and dispensing of long-acting GCSF to better serve pediatric patients within a single health care system.
Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective chart review with the purpose of collecting data to compare prescription retention before and after the improvement intervention. Study timeline includes all doses of long-acting GCSF prescribed for pediatric oncology patients between June 2020-June 2021 compared with July 2021-March 2022. On June 30, 2021, educational information was provided to the appropriate stakeholders regarding the change in practice.
Results: A total of 31 patients were included in the review, with 22 patients prior to the intervention (115 prescriptions), and 9 patients after the intervention (43 prescriptions). There was a 37.8% increase in health system prescription retention (15.7% vs 53.5%).
Conclusions: Pharmacist directed long-acting GCSF prescription destination and a dedicated prior-authorization team led to an increase in prescription retention for patients regardless of payer mandated outpatient pharmacy.
{"title":"Evaluation of a Quality Improvement Process for Health-System Retention of Long Acting Growth Factors Prescriptions in the Pediatric Oncology Population.","authors":"Alexis Hamelink, Joshua Elder, Kyle Harwood","doi":"10.5863/1551-6776-29.2.175","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5863/1551-6776-29.2.175","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (GCSF) products are often used in pediatric patients with malignant diagnoses to reduce the time that the patient is neutropenic. Long-acting GCSF products have been shown to be non-inferior to daily dosing of GCSF products, and are becoming more desired by patients and families. Insurance companies often require a prior authorization prior to approving the use of the long-acting GCSF products. This process has proven challenging leading to treatment delays and missed doses. The purpose of this study is to evaluate a quality improvement process for the prescribing and dispensing of long-acting GCSF to better serve pediatric patients within a single health care system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-center, retrospective chart review with the purpose of collecting data to compare prescription retention before and after the improvement intervention. Study timeline includes all doses of long-acting GCSF prescribed for pediatric oncology patients between June 2020-June 2021 compared with July 2021-March 2022. On June 30, 2021, educational information was provided to the appropriate stakeholders regarding the change in practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 31 patients were included in the review, with 22 patients prior to the intervention (115 prescriptions), and 9 patients after the intervention (43 prescriptions). There was a 37.8% increase in health system prescription retention (15.7% vs 53.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pharmacist directed long-acting GCSF prescription destination and a dedicated prior-authorization team led to an increase in prescription retention for patients regardless of payer mandated outpatient pharmacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":37484,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"29 2","pages":"175-179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11001207/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140866750","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-01Epub Date: 2024-04-08DOI: 10.5863/1551-6776-29.2.206
Som S Biswas
{"title":"Seeing Beyond Words: The Revolutionary Role of ChatGPT Vision in Research and Publication.","authors":"Som S Biswas","doi":"10.5863/1551-6776-29.2.206","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5863/1551-6776-29.2.206","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37484,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"29 2","pages":"206-207"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11001206/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140867409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-01Epub Date: 2024-04-08DOI: 10.5863/1551-6776-29.2.96
Richard Grossberg
{"title":"Polypharmacy-An Important Contributor to Health and Safety for Children With Medical Complexity: How Can We Improve Care for This Vulnerable Population?","authors":"Richard Grossberg","doi":"10.5863/1551-6776-29.2.96","DOIUrl":"10.5863/1551-6776-29.2.96","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37484,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"29 2","pages":"96-99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11001216/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140870125","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-01Epub Date: 2024-04-08DOI: 10.5863/1551-6776-29.2.188
Emily Chung, Kristin Reinaker, Rachel Meyers
Objective: Ethanol is a common excipient used in liquid medications to enhance solubility and inhibit -bacterial growth. While the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) have released guidance for how much ethanol is acceptable in medicines, many medications contain more than the recommended amount. The objective of this study was to determine what effect these medications would have on blood alcohol concentration (BAC) for pediatric patients, defined as those medications that would increase the BAC by ≥2.5 mg/dL.
Methods: A list of medications dispensed to pediatric patients from a single hospital over a period of 4 months was obtained. The package inserts of these medications were reviewed to determine ethanol content. Typical doses were used to determine the amount of ethanol pediatric patients weighing 10, 20, and 40 kg would receive. The theoretical BAC was then calculated for each medication containing ethanol.
Results: Seven hundred ninety-six medications were dispensed for pediatric patients during the study period, of which 33 contained ethanol. Seven medications would be projected to increase the BAC above 2.5 mg/dL with a normal pediatric dose.
Conclusion: While most medications do not contain ethanol, we found 7 that contained enough ethanol to potentially raise the BAC above 2.5 mg/dL. Health care practitioners should consider the ethanol content of medications prior to recommending them in children and when assessing overdoses.
{"title":"Ethanol Content of Medications and Its Effect on Blood Alcohol Concentration in Pediatric Patients.","authors":"Emily Chung, Kristin Reinaker, Rachel Meyers","doi":"10.5863/1551-6776-29.2.188","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5863/1551-6776-29.2.188","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Ethanol is a common excipient used in liquid medications to enhance solubility and inhibit -bacterial growth. While the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) have released guidance for how much ethanol is acceptable in medicines, many medications contain more than the recommended amount. The objective of this study was to determine what effect these medications would have on blood alcohol concentration (BAC) for pediatric patients, defined as those medications that would increase the BAC by ≥2.5 mg/dL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A list of medications dispensed to pediatric patients from a single hospital over a period of 4 months was obtained. The package inserts of these medications were reviewed to determine ethanol content. Typical doses were used to determine the amount of ethanol pediatric patients weighing 10, 20, and 40 kg would receive. The theoretical BAC was then calculated for each medication containing ethanol.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven hundred ninety-six medications were dispensed for pediatric patients during the study period, of which 33 contained ethanol. Seven medications would be projected to increase the BAC above 2.5 mg/dL with a normal pediatric dose.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While most medications do not contain ethanol, we found 7 that contained enough ethanol to potentially raise the BAC above 2.5 mg/dL. Health care practitioners should consider the ethanol content of medications prior to recommending them in children and when assessing overdoses.</p>","PeriodicalId":37484,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"29 2","pages":"188-194"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11001219/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140866710","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-01Epub Date: 2024-04-08DOI: 10.5863/1551-6776-29.2.159
Lauren Fleser, Erin Tibbetts, Alison Hanson, Esther Chang Chu, Kathleen Gura, Crystal Tom, Kathryn Williams, Philip Levy
Objective: Gabapentin for management of neuropathic pain, irritability, neonatal abstinence syndrome, rescue sedation, feeding intolerance and visceral hyperalgesia in infants has grown over the past decade. There remains little guidance for indications, initiation, titration and maintenance dosing trends and assessment of outcomes. The primary objective was to describe gabapentin dosing, and the secondary objectives were to identify outcomes to assess efficacy and describe weaning practices.
Methods: A retrospective single-center study was performed in infants younger than 1 year who received gabapentin at Boston Children's Hospital between 2015 and 2021. The primary outcome was indication, initiation and maximum gabapentin dose. Secondary outcomes included mortality, adverse reactions and impact on feeding volumes, weight-for-age Z-scores and face, legs, activity, cry, consolability (FLACC) scores. Descriptive statistics were utilized.
Results: Sixty-six infants received gabapentin at a mean ± SD age of 5.5 ± 2.7 months (range of 0-11 months). The mean ± SD initiation dose of gabapentin was 8.6 ± 5.4 mg/kg/day with a median interval of 24 hours (8-24 hours). The maximum mean dose was 23.2 ± 14.4 mg/kg/day at a median interval of every 8 hours (8 hours). The most common indications for initiation were irritability, rescue sedation, and visceral hyperalgesia. There was a statistical improvement in weight-for-age Z scores from 24 hours prior to gabapentin initiation to 2 weeks after the maximum dose of gabapentin (-2.23 ± 1.78 to -1.66 ± 1.91, p < 0.001) and a reduction in FLACC scores (2.29 ± 1.64 to 1.52 ± 1.76, p = 0.007) from 24 hours prior to gabapentin initiation to 3 days after the maximum dose of gabapentin. Three patients experienced minor adverse events.
Conclusions: Gabapentin was well tolerated in infants. Initial gabapentin dosing of 5 mg/kg/dose every 24 hours appears safe and consistent with other published studies in infants. The improvement in outcomes with few adverse events suggests a beneficial role for gabapentin.
{"title":"Evaluating Gabapentin Dosing, Efficacy and Safety in Infants.","authors":"Lauren Fleser, Erin Tibbetts, Alison Hanson, Esther Chang Chu, Kathleen Gura, Crystal Tom, Kathryn Williams, Philip Levy","doi":"10.5863/1551-6776-29.2.159","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5863/1551-6776-29.2.159","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Gabapentin for management of neuropathic pain, irritability, neonatal abstinence syndrome, rescue sedation, feeding intolerance and visceral hyperalgesia in infants has grown over the past decade. There remains little guidance for indications, initiation, titration and maintenance dosing trends and assessment of outcomes. The primary objective was to describe gabapentin dosing, and the secondary objectives were to identify outcomes to assess efficacy and describe weaning practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective single-center study was performed in infants younger than 1 year who received gabapentin at Boston Children's Hospital between 2015 and 2021. The primary outcome was indication, initiation and maximum gabapentin dose. Secondary outcomes included mortality, adverse reactions and impact on feeding volumes, weight-for-age Z-scores and face, legs, activity, cry, consolability (FLACC) scores. Descriptive statistics were utilized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-six infants received gabapentin at a mean ± SD age of 5.5 ± 2.7 months (range of 0-11 months). The mean ± SD initiation dose of gabapentin was 8.6 ± 5.4 mg/kg/day with a median interval of 24 hours (8-24 hours). The maximum mean dose was 23.2 ± 14.4 mg/kg/day at a median interval of every 8 hours (8 hours). The most common indications for initiation were irritability, rescue sedation, and visceral hyperalgesia. There was a statistical improvement in weight-for-age Z scores from 24 hours prior to gabapentin initiation to 2 weeks after the maximum dose of gabapentin (-2.23 ± 1.78 to -1.66 ± 1.91, p < 0.001) and a reduction in FLACC scores (2.29 ± 1.64 to 1.52 ± 1.76, p = 0.007) from 24 hours prior to gabapentin initiation to 3 days after the maximum dose of gabapentin. Three patients experienced minor adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Gabapentin was well tolerated in infants. Initial gabapentin dosing of 5 mg/kg/dose every 24 hours appears safe and consistent with other published studies in infants. The improvement in outcomes with few adverse events suggests a beneficial role for gabapentin.</p>","PeriodicalId":37484,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"29 2","pages":"159-168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11001217/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140865830","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-01Epub Date: 2024-04-08DOI: 10.5863/1551-6776-29.2.100
Kaitlin Bredenkamp, Michael J Raschka, Amy Holmes
The concept of the second victim, described as the sense of victimization of health care professionals following the exposure to a traumatic, unanticipated medical error, was first introduced in 2000 by Albert W. Wu. Since then, the concept has gained immense traction and inspired the generation of assistance programs for second victims. With most second victim occurrences resulting from medication errors, pediatric pharmacists are at a high risk of experiencing second victim phenomenon. Second victims may experience both psychological and physical symptoms of distress often akin to post-traumatic stress disorder. Typical trajectories for second victims, as well as typical support needs, have been previously described, with several organizations responding by creating formal programs designed to support their staff in the events of traumatic workplace experiences. Most support programs involve peer-to-peer support, group sessions, and programs designed to increase coping skills. Additional resources are available for health care workers who do not have formalized support programs at their institution, although these are limited. Despite these resources, institutions across the country have room for additional growth in their support of employees who become second victims to tragedy.
第二受害者的概念是指医护人员在遭遇创伤性、意外医疗失误后的受害感,由 Albert W. Wu 于 2000 年首次提出。从那时起,这个概念就得到了广泛的关注,并激发了为第二受害者提供援助计划的产生。由于大多数第二受害者事件都是由用药错误造成的,因此儿科药剂师是第二受害者现象的高危人群。第二受害者可能会经历心理和生理上的痛苦症状,通常类似于创伤后应激障碍。第二受害者的典型轨迹以及典型的支持需求已在之前的文章中有所描述,一些机构通过创建正式的项目来应对,这些项目旨在为在工作场所遭受创伤的员工提供支持。大多数支持计划包括同伴互助、小组会议和旨在提高应对技能的计划。对于机构内没有正式支持计划的医护人员,还可以获得额外的资源,尽管这些资源非常有限。尽管有这些资源,全国各地的医疗机构在为成为悲剧第二受害者的员工提供支持方面仍有进一步发展的空间。
{"title":"A Review of Medication Errors and the Second Victim in Pediatric Pharmacy.","authors":"Kaitlin Bredenkamp, Michael J Raschka, Amy Holmes","doi":"10.5863/1551-6776-29.2.100","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5863/1551-6776-29.2.100","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The concept of the second victim, described as the sense of victimization of health care professionals following the exposure to a traumatic, unanticipated medical error, was first introduced in 2000 by Albert W. Wu. Since then, the concept has gained immense traction and inspired the generation of assistance programs for second victims. With most second victim occurrences resulting from medication errors, pediatric pharmacists are at a high risk of experiencing second victim phenomenon. Second victims may experience both psychological and physical symptoms of distress often akin to post-traumatic stress disorder. Typical trajectories for second victims, as well as typical support needs, have been previously described, with several organizations responding by creating formal programs designed to support their staff in the events of traumatic workplace experiences. Most support programs involve peer-to-peer support, group sessions, and programs designed to increase coping skills. Additional resources are available for health care workers who do not have formalized support programs at their institution, although these are limited. Despite these resources, institutions across the country have room for additional growth in their support of employees who become second victims to tragedy.</p>","PeriodicalId":37484,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"29 2","pages":"100-106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11001212/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140866731","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-01Epub Date: 2024-04-08DOI: 10.5863/1551-6776-29.2.151
Shannon V McGrath, Allie Rivera, Christopher Kennie-Richardson, David Ehrmann, Julie Cline, Kaye Gable, Victoria Forrest
Objective: An increase in maternal use of licit or illicit substances, alcohol, and tobacco has resulted in an increased incidence of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS). In recent years, NAS management has shifted to initiating an Eat, Sleep, Console (ESC) approach prior to pharmacologic treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of ESC in combination with pharmacologic treatment in the management of NAS for infants exposed to substance use in utero.
Methods: This single system, multisite, retrospective cohort study evaluated infants with known exposure to substance or polysubstance use in utero or those who had signs and symptoms of withdrawal with a positive toxicology screen. The primary outcome of rate of pharmacologic therapy initiated was evaluated pre and post implementation of ESC. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay, day of life that pharmacologic therapy was initiated, and an evaluation of the ESC guideline. A subgroup analysis with similar outcomes was also performed for patients with maternal polysubstance use.
Results: A total of 2843 patients were screened, and 50 patients were randomly selected for -inclusion in both pre- and post-groups. The rate of pharmacologic therapy initiated post implementation of ESC decreased from 58% to 30% (p < 0.01). In the post-group, there was a decrease in the number of -patients requiring scheduled morphine (33%, p < 0.01) and duration of pharmacologic therapy (14.6 days vs 6.47 days, p < 0.01).
Conclusions: Implementing an ESC guideline decreased the length of stay and rate of pharmacologic intervention needed for infants with NAS at our institution.
{"title":"Evaluating the Impact of Eat, Sleep, Console in Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome Treatment for Infants Exposed to Substance Use <i>In Utero</i>.","authors":"Shannon V McGrath, Allie Rivera, Christopher Kennie-Richardson, David Ehrmann, Julie Cline, Kaye Gable, Victoria Forrest","doi":"10.5863/1551-6776-29.2.151","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5863/1551-6776-29.2.151","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>An increase in maternal use of licit or illicit substances, alcohol, and tobacco has resulted in an increased incidence of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS). In recent years, NAS management has shifted to initiating an Eat, Sleep, Console (ESC) approach prior to pharmacologic treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of ESC in combination with pharmacologic treatment in the management of NAS for infants exposed to substance use <i>in utero</i>.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single system, multisite, retrospective cohort study evaluated infants with known exposure to substance or polysubstance use <i>in utero</i> or those who had signs and symptoms of withdrawal with a positive toxicology screen. The primary outcome of rate of pharmacologic therapy initiated was evaluated pre and post implementation of ESC. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay, day of life that pharmacologic therapy was initiated, and an evaluation of the ESC guideline. A subgroup analysis with similar outcomes was also performed for patients with maternal polysubstance use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2843 patients were screened, and 50 patients were randomly selected for -inclusion in both pre- and post-groups. The rate of pharmacologic therapy initiated post implementation of ESC decreased from 58% to 30% (p < 0.01). In the post-group, there was a decrease in the number of -patients requiring scheduled morphine (33%, p < 0.01) and duration of pharmacologic therapy (14.6 days vs 6.47 days, p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementing an ESC guideline decreased the length of stay and rate of pharmacologic intervention needed for infants with NAS at our institution.</p>","PeriodicalId":37484,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"29 2","pages":"151-158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11001210/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140866078","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-01Epub Date: 2024-04-08DOI: 10.5863/1551-6776-29.2.208
Daniel Austin
{"title":"Communication.","authors":"Daniel Austin","doi":"10.5863/1551-6776-29.2.208","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5863/1551-6776-29.2.208","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37484,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"29 2","pages":"208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11001213/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140863281","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objectives: Enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in pediatric patients is -typically dosed twice a day. The use of once-daily dosing like that used in adult patients is limited because of a lack of safety and efficacy data. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of -once-daily versus twice-daily dosing of enoxaparin for pediatric VTE prophylaxis based on incidence of thrombotic and bleeding events.
Methods: This was a 3-year retrospective chart review of enoxaparin received for VTE prophylaxis at -Cohen Children's Medical Center, New Hyde Park, NY. Exclusion criteria were age 18 years or older, and renal dysfunction.
Results: A total of 177 enoxaparin courses (81 in the once-daily and 96 in the twice-daily group) were included. The median dose in the once-daily group was 0.68 mg/kg/dose with dose capping at 40 mg/dose in 70% of patients. One patient in the once-daily group had a VTE, whereas no patients in the twice-daily group experienced a VTE. One major bleeding event occurred in the once-daily group (p = 0.46); however, minor bleeding events were comparable between the 2 groups (p = 0.69).
Conclusions: Once-daily enoxaparin prophylaxis appears to be safe and effective based on minimal -differences in incidence of thrombotic and bleeding events when compared to twice-daily dosing. Based on this study, it may be reasonable to consider once-daily enoxaparin dosing for prophylaxis, especially in older children. A larger multicenter cohort study evaluating once-daily dosing for prophylaxis is warranted to validate the safety and efficacy specifically for risk-based dosing strategies.
{"title":"Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Enoxaparin Once-Daily Versus Twice-Daily Dosing for Prophylaxis in Pediatric Patients.","authors":"Danielle Morgan, Jinjoo Kang, Chana Levine, Suchitra Acharya","doi":"10.5863/1551-6776-29.2.130","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5863/1551-6776-29.2.130","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in pediatric patients is -typically dosed twice a day. The use of once-daily dosing like that used in adult patients is limited because of a lack of safety and efficacy data. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of -once-daily versus twice-daily dosing of enoxaparin for pediatric VTE prophylaxis based on incidence of thrombotic and bleeding events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a 3-year retrospective chart review of enoxaparin received for VTE prophylaxis at -Cohen Children's Medical Center, New Hyde Park, NY. Exclusion criteria were age 18 years or older, and renal dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 177 enoxaparin courses (81 in the once-daily and 96 in the twice-daily group) were included. The median dose in the once-daily group was 0.68 mg/kg/dose with dose capping at 40 mg/dose in 70% of patients. One patient in the once-daily group had a VTE, whereas no patients in the twice-daily group experienced a VTE. One major bleeding event occurred in the once-daily group (p = 0.46); however, minor bleeding events were comparable between the 2 groups (p = 0.69).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Once-daily enoxaparin prophylaxis appears to be safe and effective based on minimal -differences in incidence of thrombotic and bleeding events when compared to twice-daily dosing. Based on this study, it may be reasonable to consider once-daily enoxaparin dosing for prophylaxis, especially in older children. A larger multicenter cohort study evaluating once-daily dosing for prophylaxis is warranted to validate the safety and efficacy specifically for risk-based dosing strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":37484,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"29 2","pages":"130-134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11001208/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140852605","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-01Epub Date: 2024-04-08DOI: 10.5863/1551-6776-29.2.195
Gioacchino Andrea Rotulo, Claudia Campanello, Marcella Battaglini, Marta Bassi, Carlotta Pastorino, Andrea Angeletti, Giacomo Brisca, Sara Signa, Roberta Caorsi, Gian Marco Ghiggeri
Allopurinol-induced drug reaction syndrome with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (A-DRESS) is a well-described condition in adults, whereas it is uncommon among children. We describe a case of A-DRESS in a 16-year-old male with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome. He presented a life-threatening clinical course with persisting fever, skin rash, eosinophilia, lymphadenopathy, distributive shock, and herpesvirus 6 detection. The withdrawal of allopurinol and a combination of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIGs) and systemic corticosteroids led to the patient's recovery without sequelae. Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) in pediatrics is rare and can present in a severe form. Early diagnosis and timely treatment are critical for prognostic purposes. This report suggests the potentially crucial role of IVIG in the treatment of patients with A-DRESS.
{"title":"A Rare Pediatric Case of Allopurinol-Induced Drug Reaction With Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) Successfully Treated With Intravenous Immunoglobulins.","authors":"Gioacchino Andrea Rotulo, Claudia Campanello, Marcella Battaglini, Marta Bassi, Carlotta Pastorino, Andrea Angeletti, Giacomo Brisca, Sara Signa, Roberta Caorsi, Gian Marco Ghiggeri","doi":"10.5863/1551-6776-29.2.195","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5863/1551-6776-29.2.195","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Allopurinol-induced drug reaction syndrome with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (A-DRESS) is a well-described condition in adults, whereas it is uncommon among children. We describe a case of A-DRESS in a 16-year-old male with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome. He presented a life-threatening clinical course with persisting fever, skin rash, eosinophilia, lymphadenopathy, distributive shock, and herpesvirus 6 detection. The withdrawal of allopurinol and a combination of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIGs) and systemic corticosteroids led to the patient's recovery without sequelae. Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) in pediatrics is rare and can present in a severe form. Early diagnosis and timely treatment are critical for prognostic purposes. This report suggests the potentially crucial role of IVIG in the treatment of patients with A-DRESS.</p>","PeriodicalId":37484,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"29 2","pages":"195-199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11001218/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140871400","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}