首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics最新文献

英文 中文
Enteral Feedings Do Not Increase the Risk of NEC in ELBW Infants Undergoing Treatment of Patent Ductus Arteriosus With Acetaminophen. 肠内喂养不会增加使用对乙酰氨基酚治疗动脉导管未闭的 ELBW 婴儿发生 NEC 的风险。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-10 DOI: 10.5863/1551-6776-29.3.278
Katherine V Katsivalis, Jessica L Jacobson, Rakhee Bowker, Andrew Berenz, Sara Hovey, Kristen W Click

Objective: Acetaminophen (APAP) is an alternative to indomethacin and ibuprofen for treatment of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). The side effect profile of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) presents enteral feeding safety concerns; however, the safety of enteral feeding on APAP is largely unknown. Optimal feeding strategies during pharmacological PDA treatment are unknown, leading to practice variation. This study aims to assess the incidence of adverse gastrointestinal (GI) outcomes in neonates treated with APAP for PDA closure while receiving enteral feedings.

Methods: Single-center retrospective cohort study of 59 extremely low birth weight (ELBW), premature neonates who received APAP for PDA treatment divided into Low Volume (LV; ≤ 20 mL/kg/day) and High Volume (HV; > 20 mL/kg/day) enteral feeding groups. The primary outcome was the incidence of any suspected or confirmed necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Timing of nutrition milestones, parenteral nutrition (PN) days, and adverse outcomes (feeding intolerance, liver dysfunction, death prior to discharge) were evaluated.

Results: The incidence of suspected or confirmed NEC was 19.5% in the LV group and 13.3% in the HV group (p = 0.593). The HV group reached full feeds 6 days sooner (18 vs 24 days, p = 0.024) and had fewer PN days (17 vs 23.5 days, p = 0.044) with no difference in adverse outcomes.

Conclusions: Provision of > 20 mL/kg/day of enteral feeds during APAP treatment of PDA decreased time to full feeds and PN days compared to trophic feedings (≤ 20 mL/kg/day) with no difference in adverse GI outcomes. Continuing enteral feeding during APAP PDA treatment appears safe while improving achievement of nutritional milestones.

目的:对乙酰氨基酚(APAP)是治疗动脉导管未闭(PDA)的吲哚美辛和布洛芬的替代药物。非甾体类消炎药(NSAIDs)的副作用引起了肠内喂养的安全性问题;然而,APAP 的肠内喂养安全性在很大程度上还不为人所知。PDA 药物治疗期间的最佳喂养策略尚不清楚,导致实践中存在差异。本研究旨在评估使用 APAP 进行 PDA 封闭治疗的新生儿在接受肠内喂养期间胃肠道(GI)不良反应的发生率:单中心回顾性队列研究:59 例接受 APAP 治疗 PDA 的极低出生体重(ELBW)早产新生儿被分为低容量(LV;≤ 20 mL/kg/day)和高容量(HV;> 20 mL/kg/day)肠道喂养组。主要结果是疑似或确诊坏死性小肠结肠炎(NEC)的发生率。对营养里程碑的时间、肠外营养(PN)天数和不良后果(喂养不耐受、肝功能异常、出院前死亡)进行了评估:LV 组疑似或确诊 NEC 的发生率为 19.5%,HV 组为 13.3%(P = 0.593)。HV组提前6天(18天 vs 24天,p = 0.024)完全进食,PN天数减少(17天 vs 23.5天,p = 0.044),不良后果无差异:结论:与营养性喂养(≤ 20 毫升/千克/天)相比,在 APAP 治疗 PDA 期间提供 > 20 毫升/千克/天的肠内喂养可缩短完全进食时间和 PN 天数,但对消化道不良后果的影响无差异。在 APAP PDA 治疗期间继续进行肠内喂养似乎是安全的,同时还能改善营养里程碑的实现。
{"title":"Enteral Feedings Do Not Increase the Risk of NEC in ELBW Infants Undergoing Treatment of Patent Ductus Arteriosus With Acetaminophen.","authors":"Katherine V Katsivalis, Jessica L Jacobson, Rakhee Bowker, Andrew Berenz, Sara Hovey, Kristen W Click","doi":"10.5863/1551-6776-29.3.278","DOIUrl":"10.5863/1551-6776-29.3.278","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Acetaminophen (APAP) is an alternative to indomethacin and ibuprofen for treatment of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). The side effect profile of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) presents enteral feeding safety concerns; however, the safety of enteral feeding on APAP is largely unknown. Optimal feeding strategies during pharmacological PDA treatment are unknown, leading to practice variation. This study aims to assess the incidence of adverse gastrointestinal (GI) outcomes in neonates treated with APAP for PDA closure while receiving enteral feedings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-center retrospective cohort study of 59 extremely low birth weight (ELBW), premature neonates who received APAP for PDA treatment divided into Low Volume (LV; ≤ 20 mL/kg/day) and High Volume (HV; > 20 mL/kg/day) enteral feeding groups. The primary outcome was the incidence of any suspected or confirmed necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Timing of nutrition milestones, parenteral nutrition (PN) days, and adverse outcomes (feeding intolerance, liver dysfunction, death prior to discharge) were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of suspected or confirmed NEC was 19.5% in the LV group and 13.3% in the HV group (p = 0.593). The HV group reached full feeds 6 days sooner (18 vs 24 days, p = 0.024) and had fewer PN days (17 vs 23.5 days, p = 0.044) with no difference in adverse outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Provision of > 20 mL/kg/day of enteral feeds during APAP treatment of PDA decreased time to full feeds and PN days compared to trophic feedings (≤ 20 mL/kg/day) with no difference in adverse GI outcomes. Continuing enteral feeding during APAP PDA treatment appears safe while improving achievement of nutritional milestones.</p>","PeriodicalId":37484,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"29 3","pages":"278-285"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11163909/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141306971","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Removing Barriers to Contraceptive Access for Adolescents. 消除青少年获得避孕药具的障碍。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-10 DOI: 10.5863/1551-6776-29.3.331
Kristen Reilly, Kelsey K Schmuhl, Andrea E Bonny
{"title":"Removing Barriers to Contraceptive Access for Adolescents.","authors":"Kristen Reilly, Kelsey K Schmuhl, Andrea E Bonny","doi":"10.5863/1551-6776-29.3.331","DOIUrl":"10.5863/1551-6776-29.3.331","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37484,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"29 3","pages":"331-335"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11163908/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141307041","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of Intravenous Methadone Dosing Schedule on Iatrogenic Withdrawal Syndrome in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. 静脉注射美沙酮的剂量安排对儿科重症监护病房中的先天性戒断综合征的影响。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-10 DOI: 10.5863/1551-6776-29.3.266
Aleah Groman, Autumn Spyhalsky, Kelly Michienzi, Ryan Breuer

Objective: To compare median Sophia Observation withdrawal Symptoms scale (SOS) scores between -intravenous methadone dosing scheduled every 6 hours or every 8 hours for iatrogenic withdrawal -syndrome (IWS).

Methods: This single-center, retrospective chart review evaluated patients aged 4 weeks through 18 years treated with intravenous methadone for IWS. Children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of a tertiary care children's hospital between August 2017 and July 2021 and treated for IWS for at least 48 hours were eligible for inclusion. Methadone dosing schedules were compared, with a primary outcome of median Sophia Observation withdrawal Symptoms (SOS) score during the first 24 hours after cessation of continuous fentanyl infusion. Secondary outcomes included PICU and general pediatric unit lengths of stay, extubation failure rates, and mortality.

Results: Twenty patients met inclusion criteria, with 9 in the 6-hour dosing group. There was no difference in median SOS score, extubation failure, length of stay, or mortality between the 2 groups.

Conclusions: During the first 24 hours after cessation of continuous fentanyl, there appears to be no -difference in IWS severity, as determined by bedside nurse scoring, between patients treated with -intravenous methadone every 6 hours compared with every 8 hours.

目的比较每 6 小时或每 8 小时静脉注射美沙酮治疗先天性戒断综合征(IWS)的索菲亚戒断症状观察量表(SOS)中位数评分:这项单一中心的回顾性病历审查评估了 4 周至 18 岁因 IWS 而接受美沙酮静脉注射治疗的患者。2017年8月至2021年7月期间入住一家三级儿童医院儿科重症监护室(PICU)、接受IWS治疗至少48小时的儿童符合纳入条件。对美沙酮给药方案进行了比较,主要结果为停止持续输注芬太尼后头24小时内索菲亚观察戒断症状(SOS)的中位数评分。次要结果包括 PICU 和普通儿科病房的住院时间、拔管失败率和死亡率:20名患者符合纳入标准,其中9人属于6小时给药组。两组患者的中位 SOS 评分、拔管失败率、住院时间和死亡率均无差异:结论:在停止使用连续芬太尼后的最初 24 小时内,根据床旁护士评分,每 6 小时静脉注射一次美沙酮的患者与每 8 小时静脉注射一次美沙酮的患者在 IWS 严重程度上似乎没有差异。
{"title":"Impact of Intravenous Methadone Dosing Schedule on Iatrogenic Withdrawal Syndrome in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.","authors":"Aleah Groman, Autumn Spyhalsky, Kelly Michienzi, Ryan Breuer","doi":"10.5863/1551-6776-29.3.266","DOIUrl":"10.5863/1551-6776-29.3.266","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare median Sophia Observation withdrawal Symptoms scale (SOS) scores between -intravenous methadone dosing scheduled every 6 hours or every 8 hours for iatrogenic withdrawal -syndrome (IWS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, retrospective chart review evaluated patients aged 4 weeks through 18 years treated with intravenous methadone for IWS. Children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of a tertiary care children's hospital between August 2017 and July 2021 and treated for IWS for at least 48 hours were eligible for inclusion. Methadone dosing schedules were compared, with a primary outcome of median Sophia Observation withdrawal Symptoms (SOS) score during the first 24 hours after cessation of continuous fentanyl infusion. Secondary outcomes included PICU and general pediatric unit lengths of stay, extubation failure rates, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty patients met inclusion criteria, with 9 in the 6-hour dosing group. There was no difference in median SOS score, extubation failure, length of stay, or mortality between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>During the first 24 hours after cessation of continuous fentanyl, there appears to be no -difference in IWS severity, as determined by bedside nurse scoring, between patients treated with -intravenous methadone every 6 hours compared with every 8 hours.</p>","PeriodicalId":37484,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"29 3","pages":"266-272"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11163900/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141307036","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of the Effect of Smart Pump Interoperability on Infusion Errors in the Pediatric Hospital Setting. 评估智能泵互操作性对儿科医院输液错误的影响。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-10 DOI: 10.5863/1551-6776-29.3.323
Tracie VanHorn, Jordi Harris, Shannon Mayes, Lisa M Infanti, Amy Kennedy

Objectives: Smart pump interoperability is a newer technology integrating intravenous medication -infusion instructions from the electronic medical record into a smart pump. This technology has demonstrated significantly decreased medication errors in the adult population; however, this has not been reported in pediatrics. The purpose of this study was to compare the frequency and severity of infusion related errors before and after the implementation of smart pump interoperability at a pediatric institution.

Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted at multiple institutions within the same health care system to assess the effect of smart pump interoperability on infusion errors. Data were retrospectively analyzed for a 6-month period prior to (January-June 2020) and after (January-June 2022) smart pump interoperability implementation. All who received medications via a smart pump were included in the analysis. Infusions were excluded if administered via a patient-controlled analgesia pump, epidural pump, or intravenously pushed without using a smart pump.

Results: A total of 143,997 versus 165,343 infusions were administered in the before versus after interoperability group. There were significant decreases in mild, moderate, and severe harm averted events once interoperability was implemented (p < 0.001). Errors caught before administration decreased after interoperability implementation from 197 events to 20 events because of fewer overall errors (p < 0.001). The number of guardrail alert overrides was significantly reduced, from 23,751 to 5885 (p < 0.001), as was the number of high-risk overrides, from 5851 to 207 (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Implementing smart pump interoperability significantly reduced the frequency and severity of infusion errors and high-risk overrides at a pediatric institution.

目的:智能泵互操作性是一种较新的技术,它将电子病历中的静脉注射用药指令整合到智能泵中。该技术已证明可显著减少成人群体中的用药错误,但在儿科尚未见报道。本研究的目的是比较一家儿科机构在实施智能泵互操作性前后输液相关错误的频率和严重程度:这是一项回顾性研究,在同一医疗系统内的多家机构进行,目的是评估智能泵互操作性对输液错误的影响。对智能泵互操作性实施前(2020 年 1 月至 6 月)和实施后(2022 年 1 月至 6 月)6 个月内的数据进行了回顾性分析。所有通过智能泵接受药物治疗的患者均纳入分析范围。如果输液是通过患者控制镇痛泵、硬膜外泵或不使用智能泵的静脉推注进行的,则不包括在内:结果:互操作性前后组共进行了 143,997 对 165,343 次输液。实施互操作性后,轻度、中度和重度伤害避免事件明显减少(p < 0.001)。实施互操作性后,由于总体错误减少,用药前发现的错误从 197 例减少到 20 例(p < 0.001)。护栏警报超限次数从 23751 次大幅减少到 5885 次(p < 0.001),高风险超限次数也从 5851 次减少到 207 次(p < 0.001):结论:在一家儿科医疗机构中,智能泵互操作性的实施大大降低了输液错误和高风险超量的频率和严重程度。
{"title":"Evaluation of the Effect of Smart Pump Interoperability on Infusion Errors in the Pediatric Hospital Setting.","authors":"Tracie VanHorn, Jordi Harris, Shannon Mayes, Lisa M Infanti, Amy Kennedy","doi":"10.5863/1551-6776-29.3.323","DOIUrl":"10.5863/1551-6776-29.3.323","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Smart pump interoperability is a newer technology integrating intravenous medication -infusion instructions from the electronic medical record into a smart pump. This technology has demonstrated significantly decreased medication errors in the adult population; however, this has not been reported in pediatrics. The purpose of this study was to compare the frequency and severity of infusion related errors before and after the implementation of smart pump interoperability at a pediatric institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study conducted at multiple institutions within the same health care system to assess the effect of smart pump interoperability on infusion errors. Data were retrospectively analyzed for a 6-month period prior to (January-June 2020) and after (January-June 2022) smart pump interoperability implementation. All who received medications via a smart pump were included in the analysis. Infusions were excluded if administered via a patient-controlled analgesia pump, epidural pump, or intravenously pushed without using a smart pump.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 143,997 versus 165,343 infusions were administered in the before versus after interoperability group. There were significant decreases in mild, moderate, and severe harm averted events once interoperability was implemented (p < 0.001). Errors caught before administration decreased after interoperability implementation from 197 events to 20 events because of fewer overall errors (p < 0.001). The number of guardrail alert overrides was significantly reduced, from 23,751 to 5885 (p < 0.001), as was the number of high-risk overrides, from 5851 to 207 (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementing smart pump interoperability significantly reduced the frequency and severity of infusion errors and high-risk overrides at a pediatric institution.</p>","PeriodicalId":37484,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"29 3","pages":"323-330"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11163903/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141306974","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of Efficacy and Pharmacoeconomic Outcomes Between Calfactant and Poractant Alfa in Preterm Infants With Respiratory Distress Syndrome. 比较 Calfactant 和 Poractant Alfa 在早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征中的疗效和药物经济学结果。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-10 DOI: 10.5863/1551-6776-29.3.241
Annie Bui, Caitlin Schumann, Jennie Le, Treva Jones, Clair Schwendeman

Objectives: In order to evaluate the impact of the surfactant of choice selection, primary end points were to compare the average number of doses per patient, need for mechanical ventilation on day 3, hospital length of stay, and in-hospital mortality between calfactant and poractant alfa in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Secondary outcomes included administration complications, development of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), and estimated average per patient cost among the study population.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed at a level IV neonatal intensive care unit between January 2020 and December 2021 to compare the efficacy, safety, and pharmacoeconomic outcomes -following a surfactant of choice switch from calfactant to poractant alfa in preterm infants with RDS.

Results: Final analysis included 253 premature infants with gestational age (GA) between 22 and 36 weeks who met inclusion criteria. A total of 118 patients who received calfactant required higher average number of doses, 1.5 vs 1.3 doses (p = 0.031), and had more administration complications than 135 patients who received poractant alfa (10.2 vs 2.2%, p = 0.008). The need for redosing, mechanical ventilation on day 3, hospital length of stay, in-hospital mortality, and development of BPD were comparable between both groups. However, the estimated average per patient cost for poractant alfa was 32% higher than calfactant ($1,901 vs $1,439, p <0.001).

Conclusions: Despite the pharmacoeconomic disadvantage, preterm infants who received poractant alfa needed fewer doses and were less likely to have administration complications compared with those who received calfactant.

研究目的为了评估选择表面活性物质的影响,主要终点是比较早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)患者平均每人用药次数、第 3 天机械通气需求、住院时间以及钙actant 和 poractant alfa 的院内死亡率。次要结果包括用药并发症、支气管肺发育不良(BPD)的发生以及研究人群中每位患者的估计平均费用:在 2020 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间,在一家 IV 级新生儿重症监护病房进行了一次回顾性病历审查,以比较早产儿 RDS 患者选择将表面活性剂从钙actant 转换为 poractant alfa 后的疗效、安全性和药物经济学结果:最终分析纳入了 253 名符合纳入标准的早产儿,其胎龄(GA)在 22 到 36 周之间。与接受孔乳剂 alfa 的 135 例患者(10.2% 对 2.2%,p = 0.008)相比,接受卡尔法特的 118 例患者所需的平均剂量更高,为 1.5 剂对 1.3 剂(p = 0.031),并且出现了更多的用药并发症。两组患者重新给药、第 3 天机械通气、住院时间、院内死亡率和 BPD 的发生率相当。然而,估计每名患者使用 poractant alfa 的平均成本要比 calfactant 高 32%(1,901 美元对 1,439 美元,p 结论:"poractant alfa 比 calfactant 高 32%":尽管存在药物经济学上的劣势,但与使用 calfactant 的早产儿相比,使用 poractant alfa 的早产儿所需的剂量更少,出现用药并发症的可能性也更小。
{"title":"Comparison of Efficacy and Pharmacoeconomic Outcomes Between Calfactant and Poractant Alfa in Preterm Infants With Respiratory Distress Syndrome.","authors":"Annie Bui, Caitlin Schumann, Jennie Le, Treva Jones, Clair Schwendeman","doi":"10.5863/1551-6776-29.3.241","DOIUrl":"10.5863/1551-6776-29.3.241","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In order to evaluate the impact of the surfactant of choice selection, primary end points were to compare the average number of doses per patient, need for mechanical ventilation on day 3, hospital length of stay, and in-hospital mortality between calfactant and poractant alfa in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Secondary outcomes included administration complications, development of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), and estimated average per patient cost among the study population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was performed at a level IV neonatal intensive care unit between January 2020 and December 2021 to compare the efficacy, safety, and pharmacoeconomic outcomes -following a surfactant of choice switch from calfactant to poractant alfa in preterm infants with RDS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Final analysis included 253 premature infants with gestational age (GA) between 22 and 36 weeks who met inclusion criteria. A total of 118 patients who received calfactant required higher average number of doses, 1.5 vs 1.3 doses (p = 0.031), and had more administration complications than 135 patients who received poractant alfa (10.2 vs 2.2%, p = 0.008). The need for redosing, mechanical ventilation on day 3, hospital length of stay, in-hospital mortality, and development of BPD were comparable between both groups. However, the estimated average per patient cost for poractant alfa was 32% higher than calfactant ($1,901 vs $1,439, p <0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the pharmacoeconomic disadvantage, preterm infants who received poractant alfa needed fewer doses and were less likely to have administration complications compared with those who received calfactant.</p>","PeriodicalId":37484,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"29 3","pages":"241-247"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11163911/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141306969","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of Postoperative Efficacy and Safety of Celecoxib in Children Hospitalized After Adenotonsillectomy. 评估塞来昔布在腺扁桃体切除术后住院儿童中的术后疗效和安全性
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-10 DOI: 10.5863/1551-6776-29.3.255
Audrey Allard, Julien Valois-Demers, Annie Pellerin, Jacques E Leclerc, Karine Cloutier

Objective: The choice of optimal analgesia following an adenotonsillectomy is a clinical issue because of the risk of respiratory depression and bleeding. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of celecoxib on opioid use and pain scores in children hospitalized after adenotonsillectomy and to document its adverse effects.

Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary care pediatric hospital. We compared a group of subjects aged 1 to 17 years who were prescribed celecoxib and opioids between January 2017 and June 2020 following an adenotonsillectomy during a 3-day or less hospitalization to a group of matched controls for sex, age, and length of stay who were prescribed opioids.

Results: A total of 228 patients were identified (76 in the celecoxib + opioids group, 152 in the control group). Opioid use, in oral morphine equivalent daily dose, was lower in the celecoxib + opioids group at 0 to 24 hours of hospitalization (0.15 vs 0.20 mg/kg/day, p = 0.05). Initiating celecoxib within 24 hours of surgery (n = 60) significantly reduced opioid requirement for up to 48 hours compared with controls (0-24 hours: 0.12 vs 0.20 mg/kg/day, p = 0.002; 25-48 hours: 0.02 vs 0.09 mg/kg/day, p = 0.001). A shorter length of stay was observed for patients receiving celecoxib + opioids during the first 24-hour post--operative period (27 vs 32 hours, p = 0.01). With celecoxib use, no significant change in pain scores and occurrence of adverse effects including bleeding was found.

Conclusions: Using celecoxib early after an adenotonsillectomy has reduced both opioid use and duration of hospital stay without increasing adverse effects or bleeding.

目的:腺扁桃体切除术后,由于存在呼吸抑制和出血的风险,如何选择最佳镇痛是一个临床问题。本研究旨在评估塞来昔布对腺样体切除术后住院儿童阿片类药物使用和疼痛评分的影响,并记录其不良反应:这项回顾性研究在一家三级儿科医院进行。我们将 2017 年 1 月至 2020 年 6 月期间住院 3 天或更短时间的腺扁桃体切除术后处方塞来昔布和阿片类药物的一组 1 至 17 岁受试者与处方阿片类药物的一组性别、年龄和住院时间相匹配的对照组进行了比较:共确定了 228 名患者(塞来昔布 + 阿片类药物组 76 人,对照组 152 人)。按每日口服吗啡当量计算,塞来昔布+阿片类药物组在住院0至24小时内的阿片类药物使用量较低(0.15 vs 0.20 mg/kg/天,p = 0.05)。与对照组相比,在手术后24小时内开始使用塞来昔布(n = 60)可显著减少48小时内的阿片类药物需求量(0-24小时:0.12 mg/kg vs 0.20 mg/kg/天):0.12 vs 0.20 mg/kg/day, p = 0.002; 25-48 hours:0.02 vs 0.09 mg/kg/day,p = 0.001)。接受塞来昔布+阿片类药物治疗的患者在术后24小时内的住院时间较短(27小时 vs 32小时,p = 0.01)。使用塞来昔布后,疼痛评分和出血等不良反应的发生率均无明显变化:结论:腺扁桃体切除术后尽早使用塞来昔布可减少阿片类药物的使用量和住院时间,同时不会增加不良反应或出血。
{"title":"Evaluation of Postoperative Efficacy and Safety of Celecoxib in Children Hospitalized After Adenotonsillectomy.","authors":"Audrey Allard, Julien Valois-Demers, Annie Pellerin, Jacques E Leclerc, Karine Cloutier","doi":"10.5863/1551-6776-29.3.255","DOIUrl":"10.5863/1551-6776-29.3.255","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The choice of optimal analgesia following an adenotonsillectomy is a clinical issue because of the risk of respiratory depression and bleeding. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of celecoxib on opioid use and pain scores in children hospitalized after adenotonsillectomy and to document its adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary care pediatric hospital. We compared a group of subjects aged 1 to 17 years who were prescribed celecoxib and opioids between January 2017 and June 2020 following an adenotonsillectomy during a 3-day or less hospitalization to a group of matched controls for sex, age, and length of stay who were prescribed opioids.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 228 patients were identified (76 in the celecoxib + opioids group, 152 in the control group). Opioid use, in oral morphine equivalent daily dose, was lower in the celecoxib + opioids group at 0 to 24 hours of hospitalization (0.15 vs 0.20 mg/kg/day, p = 0.05). Initiating celecoxib within 24 hours of surgery (n = 60) significantly reduced opioid requirement for up to 48 hours compared with controls (0-24 hours: 0.12 vs 0.20 mg/kg/day, p = 0.002; 25-48 hours: 0.02 vs 0.09 mg/kg/day, p = 0.001). A shorter length of stay was observed for patients receiving celecoxib + opioids during the first 24-hour post--operative period (27 vs 32 hours, p = 0.01). With celecoxib use, no significant change in pain scores and occurrence of adverse effects including bleeding was found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using celecoxib early after an adenotonsillectomy has reduced both opioid use and duration of hospital stay without increasing adverse effects or bleeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":37484,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"29 3","pages":"255-265"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11163914/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141306973","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Measurement of Polyethylene Glycol 3350 With Standard Household Measuring Devices. 使用标准家用测量设备测量聚乙二醇 3350。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-10 DOI: 10.5863/1551-6776-29.3.286
Kristen R Nichols, Darcie D Streetman, Nicolette A Gordon, Chad A Knoderer

Objective: Though standard household measuring devices (e.g., teaspoons, tablespoons) are often used in clinical practice to measure pediatric doses of polyethylene glycol 3350 (PEG-3350), no published -literature documents the accuracy of these measurements. Standard dosing for adults is 17 grams, which is 1 capful according to the manufacturer. The objective of this study was to determine the weight of household teaspoons and tablespoons of PEG-3350.

Methods: PEG-3350 measurements were performed using 5 different household measuring teaspoons and tablespoons and the cap that accompanies the bottle for 3 different brands of PEG-3350. Using an electronic balance to determine weights, 3 investigators completed 5 measurements for each of the 5 measurement devices and PEG-3350 bottle caps as follows: leveled teaspoons and tablespoons, unleveled teaspoons and tablespoons, "heaping" tablespoons, half-capfuls, and capfuls.

Results: A leveled teaspoonful of PEG-3350 weighed ∼3.3 grams and an unleveled teaspoonful weighed ∼3.7 grams. A leveled, unleveled, and heaping tablespoon of PEG-3350 weighed about 10, 11, and 15 grams, respectively. Heaping tablespoons, half-capfuls, and capfuls resulted in the most measurement variability.

Conclusions: Use of a kitchen scale may be the most precise method of measurement, however not all patients have kitchen scales. Standard household measuring devices (teaspoons and tablespoons) may be used to conveniently measure PEG-3350 doses. Using 1 dedicated measurement device and leveling the dose may improve consistency, which could be beneficial for patients who are sensitive to dose variability.

目的:虽然在临床实践中经常使用标准的家用测量设备(如茶匙、汤匙)来测量聚乙二醇 3350 (PEG-3350) 的儿科剂量,但没有公开发表的文献记录这些测量方法的准确性。根据生产商的说法,成人的标准剂量为 17 克,即 1 瓶盖。本研究的目的是确定家用茶匙和汤匙 PEG-3350 的重量:使用 5 种不同的家用茶匙和汤匙以及 3 种不同品牌 PEG-3350 的瓶盖测量 PEG-3350 的重量。3 名调查人员使用电子天平确定重量,分别对 5 种测量装置和 PEG-3350 瓶盖完成 5 次测量,具体如下:平整的茶匙和汤匙、不平整的茶匙和汤匙、"堆叠 "汤匙、半瓶和瓶盖:匀称的一茶匙 PEG-3350 重 3.3 克,未匀称的一茶匙重 3.7 克。一茶匙 PEG-3350 的重量分别为 10 克、11 克和 15 克。匙、半瓶装和瓶装的测量结果差异最大:结论:使用厨房秤可能是最精确的测量方法,但并非所有患者都有厨房秤。标准家用测量设备(茶匙和汤匙)可用于方便地测量 PEG-3350 剂量。使用一种专用的测量设备并将剂量调平可提高一致性,这对那些对剂量变化敏感的患者有益。
{"title":"Measurement of Polyethylene Glycol 3350 With Standard Household Measuring Devices.","authors":"Kristen R Nichols, Darcie D Streetman, Nicolette A Gordon, Chad A Knoderer","doi":"10.5863/1551-6776-29.3.286","DOIUrl":"10.5863/1551-6776-29.3.286","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Though standard household measuring devices (e.g., teaspoons, tablespoons) are often used in clinical practice to measure pediatric doses of polyethylene glycol 3350 (PEG-3350), no published -literature documents the accuracy of these measurements. Standard dosing for adults is 17 grams, which is 1 capful according to the manufacturer. The objective of this study was to determine the weight of household teaspoons and tablespoons of PEG-3350.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PEG-3350 measurements were performed using 5 different household measuring teaspoons and tablespoons and the cap that accompanies the bottle for 3 different brands of PEG-3350. Using an electronic balance to determine weights, 3 investigators completed 5 measurements for each of the 5 measurement devices and PEG-3350 bottle caps as follows: leveled teaspoons and tablespoons, unleveled teaspoons and tablespoons, \"heaping\" tablespoons, half-capfuls, and capfuls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A leveled teaspoonful of PEG-3350 weighed ∼3.3 grams and an unleveled teaspoonful weighed ∼3.7 grams. A leveled, unleveled, and heaping tablespoon of PEG-3350 weighed about 10, 11, and 15 grams, respectively. Heaping tablespoons, half-capfuls, and capfuls resulted in the most measurement variability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of a kitchen scale may be the most precise method of measurement, however not all patients have kitchen scales. Standard household measuring devices (teaspoons and tablespoons) may be used to conveniently measure PEG-3350 doses. Using 1 dedicated measurement device and leveling the dose may improve consistency, which could be beneficial for patients who are sensitive to dose variability.</p>","PeriodicalId":37484,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"29 3","pages":"286-291"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11163905/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141307038","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Practice Pearls for Stimulant Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Youth. 刺激剂治疗青少年注意力缺陷/多动障碍的实践指南》(Practice Pearls for Stimulant Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Youth)。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-10 DOI: 10.5863/1551-6776-29.3.215
Danielle L Stutzman, Julie A Dopheide

Over half of youth with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have co-occurring psychiatric or medical conditions that present treatment challenges. Stimulants are the most effective pharmacologic treatment of ADHD for preschoolers to adults but questions about safety with co-occurring conditions frequently arise. In addition, stigma surrounding diagnosis and treatment can negatively impact care. This manuscript presents evidence-based practice pearls to guide treatment decisions for youth with ADHD and common coexisting psychiatric and medical conditions. Recommendations address specific stimulant adverse effects (i.e., anxiety, cardiac, growth, mania, psychosis) along with management strategies. Pearls were developed for the most common clinical questions, controversial topics, or therapeutic issues that may not be widely known. The goals of this manuscript are to: 1) provide a detailed resource for interprofessional teams regarding stimulant use in youth with ADHD, 2) improve therapeutic outcomes for youth with ADHD and co-occurring psychiatric and/or medical conditions through evidence-based recommendations, and 3) decrease stigma associated with stimulant use through education.

半数以上患有注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)的青少年同时患有精神病或内科疾病,这给治疗带来了挑战。从学龄前儿童到成年人,兴奋剂是治疗多动症最有效的药物,但经常会出现并发症的安全性问题。此外,围绕诊断和治疗的耻辱感也会对治疗产生负面影响。本手稿以循证实践为基础,为患有多动症的青少年以及常见的并存精神疾病和内科疾病的治疗决策提供指导。建议涉及特定的兴奋剂不良反应(如焦虑、心脏、生长、躁狂、精神病)以及管理策略。针对最常见的临床问题、有争议的话题或可能不广为人知的治疗问题编写了 "珍珠"。本手稿的目的是1)为跨专业团队提供有关多动症青少年使用兴奋剂的详细资料;2)通过循证建议改善多动症青少年的治疗效果,以及并发精神病和/或内科疾病;3)通过教育减少与使用兴奋剂相关的耻辱感。
{"title":"Practice Pearls for Stimulant Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Youth.","authors":"Danielle L Stutzman, Julie A Dopheide","doi":"10.5863/1551-6776-29.3.215","DOIUrl":"10.5863/1551-6776-29.3.215","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over half of youth with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have co-occurring psychiatric or medical conditions that present treatment challenges. Stimulants are the most effective pharmacologic treatment of ADHD for preschoolers to adults but questions about safety with co-occurring conditions frequently arise. In addition, stigma surrounding diagnosis and treatment can negatively impact care. This manuscript presents evidence-based practice pearls to guide treatment decisions for youth with ADHD and common coexisting psychiatric and medical conditions. Recommendations address specific stimulant adverse effects (i.e., anxiety, cardiac, growth, mania, psychosis) along with management strategies. Pearls were developed for the most common clinical questions, controversial topics, or therapeutic issues that may not be widely known. The goals of this manuscript are to: 1) provide a detailed resource for interprofessional teams regarding stimulant use in youth with ADHD, 2) improve therapeutic outcomes for youth with ADHD and co-occurring psychiatric and/or medical conditions through evidence-based recommendations, and 3) decrease stigma associated with stimulant use through education.</p>","PeriodicalId":37484,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"29 3","pages":"215-231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11163912/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141307040","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Communication. 交流。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-10 DOI: 10.5863/1551-6776-29.3.341
Rachel S Meyers
{"title":"Communication.","authors":"Rachel S Meyers","doi":"10.5863/1551-6776-29.3.341","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5863/1551-6776-29.3.341","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37484,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"29 3","pages":"341"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11163902/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141306968","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Epidemiologic Trends In Children With Toxicologic Exposures Requiring Intensive Care Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic. COVID-19 大流行之前和期间需要重症监护的毒物暴露儿童的流行病学趋势。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-10 DOI: 10.5863/1551-6776-29.3.273
Kaitlin Hughes, Adam Overberg, Kennedi Satterfield, Hannah Voss, Colin Rogerson

Objective: Pediatric poison exposures are a common reason for pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) -admission. The purpose of this study was to examine the exposure trends and patient outcomes in 2018-2019 compared with 2020-2021 amidst the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients 18 years of age or younger with a suspected toxicologic exposure from January 2018 to March 2021. The primary endpoint was rate of PICU admissions between the 2 cohorts. Secondary endpoints included medical outcome stratified by severity, PICU length of stay, and need for mechanical ventilation.

Results: Our study included a total of 340 patients with median age 14.5 (IQR, 11.9-16.1) years. There was no significant difference in age, sex, or race between the 2 cohorts. The percentage of patients admitted to the PICU for poison exposures was significantly higher in the COVID-19 cohort compared with the pre-COVID-19 cohort (8.4% vs 3.7%, p < 0.01). Severity of medical outcomes differed between the groups; the COVID-19 cohort had more extreme clinical presentations of no effect or death (p < 0.01). No significant difference was found among the remaining secondary outcomes. Classes of substances ingested were comparable with baseline poison center data.

Conclusions: Poisoning-related PICU admissions occurred at more than twice the pre-pandemic rate. This may emphasize the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on pediatric access and exposure to poisons.

目的:儿科毒物暴露是儿科重症监护室(PICU)入院的常见原因。本研究的目的是在 COVID-19 大流行的情况下,研究 2018-2019 年与 2020-2021 年的暴露趋势和患者预后:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为 2018 年 1 月至 2021 年 3 月期间疑似毒物暴露的 18 岁及以下患者。主要终点是两个队列之间的 PICU 入院率。次要终点包括按严重程度分层的医疗结果、PICU住院时间和机械通气需求:我们的研究共纳入 340 名患者,中位年龄为 14.5(IQR,11.9-16.1)岁。两组患者在年龄、性别或种族方面没有明显差异。与 COVID-19 之前的队列相比,COVID-19 队列中因接触毒物而入住 PICU 的患者比例明显更高(8.4% vs 3.7%,P < 0.01)。两组的医疗结果严重程度不同;COVID-19 组群的临床表现更极端,无影响或死亡(p < 0.01)。其余次要结果无明显差异。摄入物质的类别与毒物中心的基线数据具有可比性:与中毒相关的 PICU 入院率是疫情发生前的两倍多。结论:中毒相关的 PICU 入院率是疫情前的两倍,这可能强调了 COVID-19 疫情对儿科接触毒物的影响。
{"title":"Epidemiologic Trends In Children With Toxicologic Exposures Requiring Intensive Care Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Kaitlin Hughes, Adam Overberg, Kennedi Satterfield, Hannah Voss, Colin Rogerson","doi":"10.5863/1551-6776-29.3.273","DOIUrl":"10.5863/1551-6776-29.3.273","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Pediatric poison exposures are a common reason for pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) -admission. The purpose of this study was to examine the exposure trends and patient outcomes in 2018-2019 compared with 2020-2021 amidst the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of patients 18 years of age or younger with a suspected toxicologic exposure from January 2018 to March 2021. The primary endpoint was rate of PICU admissions between the 2 cohorts. Secondary endpoints included medical outcome stratified by severity, PICU length of stay, and need for mechanical ventilation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study included a total of 340 patients with median age 14.5 (IQR, 11.9-16.1) years. There was no significant difference in age, sex, or race between the 2 cohorts. The percentage of patients admitted to the PICU for poison exposures was significantly higher in the COVID-19 cohort compared with the pre-COVID-19 cohort (8.4% vs 3.7%, p < 0.01). Severity of medical outcomes differed between the groups; the COVID-19 cohort had more extreme clinical presentations of no effect or death (p < 0.01). No significant difference was found among the remaining secondary outcomes. Classes of substances ingested were comparable with baseline poison center data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Poisoning-related PICU admissions occurred at more than twice the pre-pandemic rate. This may emphasize the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on pediatric access and exposure to poisons.</p>","PeriodicalId":37484,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"29 3","pages":"273-277"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11163898/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141306972","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1