首页 > 最新文献

Computational Toxicology最新文献

英文 中文
New QSTR models to evaluation of imidazolium- and pyridinium-contained ionic liquids toxicity 评估含咪唑和吡啶离子液体毒性的新 QSTR 模型
Pub Date : 2024-03-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.comtox.2024.100309
Ivan Semenyuta, Vasyl Kovalishyn, Diana Hodyna, Yuliia Startseva, Sergiy Rogalsky, Larysa Metelytsia

We present machine learning studies devoted to the creation of predictive models for toxicity evaluation of imidazolium- and pyridinium-containing ionic liquids. New created predictive models were developed using the OCHEM. The predictive ability of the models was tested by cross-validation, giving a coefficient of determination q2 = 0.77–0.82. The models were applied to screen a virtual chemical library to the toxicity of ILs in Danio rerio and Daphnia magna bioassays. Models were used to predict toxicity for 25 ILs, which were then synthesized and tested in vivo. The in vivo toxicity studies found that D. magna is a more sensitive aquatic test organism than D. rerio – 67 % of the studied ILs are classified as extremely toxic with an LC50 range from 0.005 to 0.01 mg/l. At the same time, only one IL 1-dodecylpyridinium bromide with an LC50 of 0.08 mg/l is classified as extremely toxic, and 76 % are classified as slightly and moderately toxic compounds using D. rerio as a test organism. The most toxic ILs 5 and 19 were docked into the human AChE active center and demonstrated calculated binding energy values −9.5 and −9.3 kcal/mol that is comparable with the complexation of the human AChE inhibitor Donepezil, which provides insight into the potential molecular mechanisms of ILs toxicity. The created QSTR models are a successful tool for the toxicity analysis of new promising ILs. QSTR models demonstrated not only high predictive indicators but also a high percentage of correctly predicted toxicity values in vivo studies.

我们介绍了专门用于创建含咪唑和吡啶离子液体毒性评估预测模型的机器学习研究。我们使用 OCHEM 开发了新的预测模型。通过交叉验证测试了模型的预测能力,结果表明决定系数 q2 = 0.77-0.82。这些模型被应用于筛选虚拟化学库,以确定惰性惰性物质在真鲷和大型蚤生物测定中的毒性。利用模型预测了 25 种 IL 的毒性,然后合成了这些 IL 并进行了体内测试。体内毒性研究发现,大型蚤是一种比红腹锦蛇更敏感的水生试验生物--67%的所研究的ILs被归类为毒性极强,半数致死浓度范围为0.005至0.01毫克/升。同时,只有一种 LC50 值为 0.08 mg/l 的 1-dodecylpyridinium bromide 被归类为剧毒,而以 D. rerio 为测试生物的 76% 被归类为轻微和中等毒性化合物。将毒性最强的 ILs 5 和 19 与人类 AChE 活性中心对接,计算出的结合能值分别为-9.5 和-9.3 kcal/mol,与人类 AChE 抑制剂多奈哌齐的络合能值相当,这有助于深入了解 ILs 毒性的潜在分子机制。所创建的 QSTR 模型是一种成功的工具,可用于分析有潜力的新型 ILs 的毒性。QSTR 模型不仅具有很高的预测指标,而且在体内研究中正确预测毒性值的比例也很高。
{"title":"New QSTR models to evaluation of imidazolium- and pyridinium-contained ionic liquids toxicity","authors":"Ivan Semenyuta,&nbsp;Vasyl Kovalishyn,&nbsp;Diana Hodyna,&nbsp;Yuliia Startseva,&nbsp;Sergiy Rogalsky,&nbsp;Larysa Metelytsia","doi":"10.1016/j.comtox.2024.100309","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comtox.2024.100309","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We present machine learning studies devoted to the creation of predictive models for toxicity evaluation of imidazolium- and pyridinium-containing ionic liquids. New created predictive models were developed using the OCHEM. The predictive ability of the models was tested by cross-validation, giving a coefficient of determination q<sup>2</sup> = 0.77–0.82. The models were applied to screen a virtual chemical library to the toxicity of ILs in Danio rerio and Daphnia magna bioassays. Models were used to predict toxicity for 25 ILs, which were then synthesized and tested in vivo. The in vivo toxicity studies found that D. magna is a more sensitive aquatic test organism than D. rerio – 67 % of the studied ILs are classified as extremely toxic with an LC<sub>50</sub> range from 0.005 to 0.01 mg/l. At the same time, only one IL 1-dodecylpyridinium bromide with an LC<sub>50</sub> of 0.08 mg/l is classified as extremely toxic, and 76 % are classified as slightly and moderately toxic compounds using D. rerio as a test organism. The most toxic ILs 5 and 19 were docked into the human AChE active center and demonstrated calculated binding energy values −9.5 and −9.3 kcal/mol that is comparable with the complexation of the human AChE inhibitor Donepezil, which provides insight into the potential molecular mechanisms of ILs toxicity. The created QSTR models are a successful tool for the toxicity analysis of new promising ILs. QSTR models demonstrated not only high predictive indicators but also a high percentage of correctly predicted toxicity values in vivo studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37651,"journal":{"name":"Computational Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140195734","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
AOPWIKI-EXPLORER: An interactive graph-based query engine leveraging large language models AOPWIKI-ExPLORER:利用大型语言模型的基于图的交互式查询引擎
Pub Date : 2024-03-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.comtox.2024.100308
Saurav Kumar , Deepika Deepika , Karin Slater , Vikas Kumar

Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOPs) provide a basis for non-animal testing, by outlining the cascade of molecular and cellular events initiated upon stressor exposure, leading to adverse effects. In recent years, the scientific community has shown interest in developing AOPs through crowdsourcing, with the results archived in the AOP-Wiki: a centralized repository coordinated by the OECD, hosting nearly 512 AOPs (April, 2023). However, the AOP-Wiki platform currently lacks a versatile querying system, which hinders developers' exploration of the AOP network and impedes its practical use in risk assessment. This work proposes to unleash the full potential of the AOP-Wiki archive by adapting its data into a Labelled Property Graph (LPG) schema. Additionally, the tool offers a visual network query interface for both database-specific and natural language queries, facilitating the retrieval and analysis of graph data. The multi-query interface allows non-technical users to construct flexible queries, thereby enhancing the potential for AOP exploration. By reducing the time and technical requirements, the present query engine enhances the practical utilization of the valuable data within AOP-Wiki. To evaluate the platform, a case study is presented with three levels of use-case scenarios (simple, moderate, and complex queries). AOPWIKI-EXPLORER is freely available on GitHub (https://github.com/Crispae/AOPWiki_Explorer) for wider community reach and further enhancement.

不良后果途径(AOPs)概述了暴露于应激源后引发的一系列分子和细胞事件,从而为非动物试验提供了依据。近年来,科学界对通过众包方式开发 AOPs 表现出了浓厚的兴趣,并将结果归档到 AOP-Wiki 中:这是一个由经合组织(OECD)协调的集中式资料库,收录了近 512 个 AOPs(2023 年 4 月)。然而,AOP-Wiki 平台目前缺乏多功能查询系统,这阻碍了开发人员对 AOP 网络的探索,也妨碍了其在风险评估中的实际应用。这项工作建议将 AOP-Wiki 的数据改编成标签属性图(LPG)模式,以充分释放 AOP-Wiki 档案的潜力。此外,该工具还为数据库特定查询和自然语言查询提供了一个可视化网络查询界面,从而促进了图数据的检索和分析。多查询界面允许非技术用户构建灵活的查询,从而提高了 AOP 探索的潜力。通过减少时间和技术要求,本查询引擎提高了 AOP-Wiki 中宝贵数据的实际利用率。为了对该平台进行评估,我们介绍了一个案例研究,其中包括三个级别的使用场景(简单、中等和复杂查询)。AOPWIKI-EXPLORER 可在 GitHub (https://github.com/Crispae/AOPWiki_Explorer) 上免费获取,以扩大社区范围并进一步改进。
{"title":"AOPWIKI-EXPLORER: An interactive graph-based query engine leveraging large language models","authors":"Saurav Kumar ,&nbsp;Deepika Deepika ,&nbsp;Karin Slater ,&nbsp;Vikas Kumar","doi":"10.1016/j.comtox.2024.100308","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comtox.2024.100308","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOPs) provide a basis for non-animal testing, by outlining the cascade of molecular and cellular events initiated upon stressor exposure, leading to adverse effects. In recent years, the scientific community has shown interest in developing AOPs through crowdsourcing, with the results archived in the AOP-Wiki: a centralized repository coordinated by the OECD, hosting nearly 512 AOPs (April, 2023). However, the AOP-Wiki platform currently lacks a versatile querying system, which hinders developers' exploration of the AOP network and impedes its practical use in risk assessment. This work proposes to unleash the full potential of the AOP-Wiki archive by adapting its data into a Labelled Property Graph (LPG) schema. Additionally, the tool offers a visual network query interface for both database-specific and natural language queries, facilitating the retrieval and analysis of graph data. The multi-query interface allows non-technical users to construct flexible queries, thereby enhancing the potential for AOP exploration. By reducing the time and technical requirements, the present query engine enhances the practical utilization of the valuable data within AOP-Wiki. To evaluate the platform, a case study is presented with three levels of use-case scenarios (simple, moderate, and complex queries). AOPWIKI-EXPLORER is freely available on GitHub (https://github.com/Crispae/AOPWiki_Explorer) for wider community reach and further enhancement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37651,"journal":{"name":"Computational Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468111324000100/pdfft?md5=542059b7f2c1ba3e8e43c9fa101d3325&pid=1-s2.0-S2468111324000100-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140309180","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of Replicate Number and Sequencing Depth in Toxicology Dose-Response RNA-seq 评估毒理学剂量反应 RNA-seq 中的重复数量和测序深度
Pub Date : 2024-03-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.comtox.2024.100307
A. Rasim Barutcu

Sequencing depth and biological replication represent key experimental design considerations in toxicogenomics and risk assessment. However, their relative impacts on differential gene expression analysis remain unclear. Using an 8-dose chemical (Prochloraz) perturbation RNA-seq dataset in A549 cells, we systematically subsampled sequencing depth (5–100 %) and replicates (2–4) to evaluate effects on number of differentially expressed genes. While dose was the primary variance driver, replication had a greater influence than depth for optimizing detection power. With only 2 replicates, over 80% of the ∼2000 differential genes were unique to specific depths, indicating high variability. Increasing to 4 replicates substantially improved reproducibility, with over 550 genes consistently identified across most depths, representing 30% of the total differential genes. Higher replicates also increased the rate of overlap of benchmark dose pathways and precision of median benchmark dose estimates. However, key gene ontology pathways related to DNA replication, cell cycle, and division were consistently captured even at lower replicates. Thus, replication enhanced confidence but did not fundamentally expand biological findings. Our study delineates key trade-offs between sequencing depth and replication for toxicogenomic experimental design. While additional replicates fundamentally improve reproducibility, gains from depth exhibit diminishing returns. Prioritizing biological replication over depth provides a cost-effective approach to enhance interpretation without sacrificing detection of core gene expression patterns. Altogether, this study provides important insights into the experimental design of toxicogenomics experiments.

测序深度和生物复制是毒物基因组学和风险评估中关键的实验设计考虑因素。然而,它们对差异基因表达分析的相对影响仍不清楚。我们利用 A549 细胞中的 8 剂量化学试剂(Prochloraz)扰动 RNA-seq 数据集,系统地对测序深度(5%-100%)和重复序列(2-4)进行了子采样,以评估它们对差异表达基因数量的影响。虽然剂量是主要的变异驱动因素,但在优化检测能力方面,重复比深度的影响更大。在仅有 2 个重复的情况下,超过 80% 的 2000 个差异基因为特定深度所独有,表明变异性很高。将重复次数增加到 4 次大大提高了可重复性,在大多数深度上一致鉴定出 550 多个基因,占差异基因总数的 30%。更高的重复次数也提高了基准剂量途径的重叠率和基准剂量估算中值的精确度。不过,即使在较低的重复率下,与 DNA 复制、细胞周期和分裂相关的关键基因本体通路也能被持续捕获。因此,复制增强了可信度,但并没有从根本上扩展生物学发现。我们的研究为毒物基因组学实验设计划定了测序深度与复制之间的关键权衡。虽然额外的重复次数从根本上提高了可重复性,但深度带来的收益却呈现递减趋势。在不牺牲核心基因表达模式检测的前提下,优先考虑生物复制而非深度,为增强解释提供了一种经济有效的方法。总之,这项研究为毒物基因组学实验设计提供了重要启示。
{"title":"Evaluation of Replicate Number and Sequencing Depth in Toxicology Dose-Response RNA-seq","authors":"A. Rasim Barutcu","doi":"10.1016/j.comtox.2024.100307","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comtox.2024.100307","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sequencing depth and biological replication represent key experimental design considerations in toxicogenomics and risk assessment. However, their relative impacts on differential gene expression analysis remain unclear. Using an 8-dose chemical (Prochloraz) perturbation RNA-seq dataset in A549 cells, we systematically subsampled sequencing depth (5–100 %) and replicates (2–4) to evaluate effects on number of differentially expressed genes. While dose was the primary variance driver, replication had a greater influence than depth for optimizing detection power. With only 2 replicates, over 80% of the ∼2000 differential genes were unique to specific depths, indicating high variability. Increasing to 4 replicates substantially improved reproducibility, with over 550 genes consistently identified across most depths, representing 30% of the total differential genes. Higher replicates also increased the rate of overlap of benchmark dose pathways and precision of median benchmark dose estimates. However, key gene ontology pathways related to DNA replication, cell cycle, and division were consistently captured even at lower replicates. Thus, replication enhanced confidence but did not fundamentally expand biological findings. Our study delineates key trade-offs between sequencing depth and replication for toxicogenomic experimental design. While additional replicates fundamentally improve reproducibility, gains from depth exhibit diminishing returns. Prioritizing biological replication over depth provides a cost-effective approach to enhance interpretation without sacrificing detection of core gene expression patterns. Altogether, this study provides important insights into the experimental design of toxicogenomics experiments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37651,"journal":{"name":"Computational Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140180706","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A framework to support the application of the OECD guidance documents on (Q)SAR model validation and prediction assessment for regulatory decisions 支持在监管决策中应用经合组织 (OECD) 关于 (Q)SAR 模型验证和预测评估的指导文件的框架
Pub Date : 2024-03-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.comtox.2024.100305
Christopher Barber, Crina Heghes, Laura Johnston

Advances in the development and application of in silico models in toxicology has been recognised by two OECD guidance documents (69: Guidance Document On The Validation Of (Quantitative) Structure-Activity Relationship [(Q)SAR] Models and 386: (Q)SAR Assessment Framework: Guidance for the regulatory assessment of (Q)SAR models, predictions, and results based on multiple predictions) published in 2007 and 2023 respectively. The former outlines criteria for appropriate model validation, whilst the latter provides guidance around assessing predictions derived from them. The concepts and criteria described within these guidelines have been used to establish a framework to support both model builders and those applying them to support regulatory decisions. Herein we demonstrate how to meet those criteria and propose where further guidance is essential for ensuring the consistent, confident, and safe application of in silico models in support of regulatory decisions.

经合组织(OECD)的两份指导文件(69:定量)结构-活性关系[(Q)SAR]模型验证指导文件》和《386:(Q)SAR 评估框架:分别于 2007 年和 2023 年发布。前者概述了适当的模型验证标准,后者则为评估由模型得出的预测结果提供了指导。这些指南中描述的概念和标准已被用于建立一个框架,为模型构建者和应用模型支持监管决策的人员提供支持。在此,我们将展示如何达到这些标准,并提出进一步的指导对于确保一致、自信和安全地应用硅学模型支持监管决策至关重要。
{"title":"A framework to support the application of the OECD guidance documents on (Q)SAR model validation and prediction assessment for regulatory decisions","authors":"Christopher Barber,&nbsp;Crina Heghes,&nbsp;Laura Johnston","doi":"10.1016/j.comtox.2024.100305","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comtox.2024.100305","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Advances in the development and application of in silico models in toxicology has been recognised by two OECD guidance documents (69: Guidance Document On The Validation Of (Quantitative) Structure-Activity Relationship [(Q)SAR] Models and 386: (Q)SAR Assessment Framework: Guidance for the regulatory assessment of (Q)SAR models, predictions, and results based on multiple predictions) published in 2007 and 2023 respectively. The former outlines criteria for appropriate model validation, whilst the latter provides guidance around assessing predictions derived from them. The concepts and criteria described within these guidelines have been used to establish a framework to support both model builders and those applying them to support regulatory decisions. Herein we demonstrate how to meet those criteria and propose where further guidance is essential for ensuring the consistent, confident, and safe application of in silico models in support of regulatory decisions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37651,"journal":{"name":"Computational Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140190686","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Identification of potential human targets of glyphosate using in silico target fishing 利用硅学靶标钓法确定草甘膦的潜在人体靶标
Pub Date : 2024-03-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.comtox.2024.100306
Alejandro Gómez, Andrés Alarcón, Wilson Acosta, Andrés Malagón

Glyphosate is a widely used herbicide known for its effectiveness in weed control; and it is an inhibitor of the plant enzyme 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase. Currently, it is one of the most extensively used non-specific herbicides in agroindustry. However, toxic effects of glyphosate have recently been reported, including endocrine disruption, metabolic alterations, teratogenic, tumorigenic, and hepatorenal effects. Additionally, there are environmental concerns related to possible interactions with proteins from microorganisms, aquatic organisms, and mammals.

Research on the description of these interactions has gained interest, primarily with the aim of generating recommendations in terms of its use and possible regulations. On the other hand, computational methods have emerged to identify potential targets or unintended targets among numerous possible receptors. Several programs, online services, and databases are available for use in these methods.

In this study, we employed a set of online tools for computational target fishing to identify receptors of glyphosate. A set of thirteen targets were selected using six fishing tools. Furthermore, docking procedures were performed to investigate the expected interactions and binding energies. Certain associations with diseases are also reported.

草甘膦是一种广泛使用的除草剂,因其在除草方面的功效而闻名;它是植物酶 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate 合成酶的抑制剂。目前,草甘膦是农用工业中使用最广泛的非特异性除草剂之一。然而,最近有报道称草甘膦具有毒性作用,包括干扰内分泌、改变新陈代谢、致畸、致肿瘤和肝肾作用。此外,草甘膦可能与微生物、水生生物和哺乳动物的蛋白质发生相互作用,这也引起了人们对环境问题的关注。对这些相互作用进行描述的研究引起了人们的兴趣,其主要目的是就草甘膦的使用和可能的法规提出建议。另一方面,在众多可能的受体中识别潜在目标或非预期目标的计算方法已经出现。在本研究中,我们使用了一套在线工具来计算草甘膦的受体。本研究采用了一套在线工具来计算草甘膦受体的捕获,并使用六种捕获工具选择了十三个靶标。此外,我们还执行了对接程序,以研究预期的相互作用和结合能。此外,还报告了与疾病的某些关联。
{"title":"Identification of potential human targets of glyphosate using in silico target fishing","authors":"Alejandro Gómez,&nbsp;Andrés Alarcón,&nbsp;Wilson Acosta,&nbsp;Andrés Malagón","doi":"10.1016/j.comtox.2024.100306","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comtox.2024.100306","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Glyphosate is a widely used herbicide known for its effectiveness in weed control; and it is an inhibitor of the plant enzyme 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase. Currently, it is one of the most extensively used non-specific herbicides in agroindustry. However, toxic effects of glyphosate have recently been reported, including endocrine disruption, metabolic alterations, teratogenic, tumorigenic, and hepatorenal effects. Additionally, there are environmental concerns related to possible interactions with proteins from microorganisms, aquatic organisms, and mammals.</p><p>Research on the description of these interactions has gained interest, primarily with the aim of generating recommendations in terms of its use and possible regulations. On the other hand, computational methods have emerged to identify potential targets or unintended targets among numerous possible receptors. Several programs, online services, and databases are available for use in these methods.</p><p>In this study, we employed a set of online tools for computational target fishing to identify receptors of glyphosate. A set of thirteen targets were selected using six fishing tools. Furthermore, docking procedures were performed to investigate the expected interactions and binding energies. Certain associations with diseases are also reported.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37651,"journal":{"name":"Computational Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140145179","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A systematic analysis of read-across within REACH registration dossiers 对 REACH 注册档案中的交叉阅读进行系统分析
Pub Date : 2024-02-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.comtox.2024.100304
G. Patlewicz , P. Karamertzanis , K. Paul Friedman , M. Sannicola , I. Shah

Read-across is a well-established data-gap filling technique used within analogue or category approaches. Acceptance remains an issue, mainly due to the difficulties of addressing residual uncertainties associated with a read-across prediction and because assessments are expert-driven. Frameworks to develop, assess and document read-across may help reduce variability in read-across results. Data-driven read-across approaches such as Generalised Read-Across (GenRA) include quantification of uncertainties and performance. GenRA also offers opportunities on how New Approach Method (NAM) data can be systematically incorporated to support the read-across hypothesis. Herein, a systematic investigation of differences in expert-driven read-across with data-driven approaches was pursued in terms of building scientific confidence in the use of read-across. A dataset of expert-driven read-across assessments that made use of registration data as disseminated in the public International Uniform Chemical Information Database (IUCLID) (version 6) of Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) Study Results were compiled. A dataset of ∼5000 read-across cases pertaining to repeated dose and developmental toxicity was extracted and mapped to content within EPA’s Distributed Structure Searchable Toxicity database (DSSTox) to retrieve chemical name and structural identification information. Content could be mapped to ∼3600 cases which when filtered for unique cases with curated quantitative structure–activity relationship-ready SMILES resulted in 389 target-source analogue pairs. The similarity between target and the source analogues on the basis of different contexts – from structural similarity using chemical fingerprints to metabolic similarity using predicted metabolic information was evaluated. An attempt was also made to quantify the relative contribution each similarity context played relative to the target-source analogue pairs by deriving a model which predicted known analogue pairs. Finally, point of departure values (PODs) were predicted using the GenRA approach underpinned by data extracted from the EPA’s Toxicity Values Database (ToxValDB). The GenRA predicted PODs were compared with those reported within the REACH dossiers themselves. This study offers generalisable insights on how read-across is already applied for regulatory submissions and expectations on the levels of similarity necessary to make decisions.

横向读数是在模拟或分类方法中使用的一种行之有效的数据缺口填补技术。接受度仍然是一个问题,主要原因是难以解决与读数交叉预测相关的残余不确定性,以及评估是由专家驱动的。开发、评估和记录读数对比的框架可能有助于减少读数对比结果的变异性。数据驱动的读数交叉方法,如广义读数交叉(GenRA),包括对不确定性和性能的量化。GenRA 还提供了如何系统地纳入新方法 (NAM) 数据以支持读数交叉假设的机会。在此,我们对专家驱动的读数交叉与数据驱动的读数交叉之间的差异进行了系统研究,以建立对使用读数交叉的科学信心。我们汇编了一个专家驱动的交叉阅读评估数据集,该数据集使用了公开的国际统一化学品信息数据库(IUCLID)(第 6 版)中发布的化学品注册、评估、许可和限制(REACH)研究结果中的注册数据。提取了 5000 个与重复剂量和发育毒性相关的交叉阅读案例数据集,并将其与美国环保署分布式结构可搜索毒性数据库 (DSSTox) 中的内容进行映射,以检索化学名称和结构识别信息。这些内容可映射到 3600 个案例,在筛选出具有可编辑的定量结构-活性关系 SMILES 的唯一案例后,得出了 389 对目标-来源类似物。根据不同的背景--从使用化学指纹的结构相似性到使用预测代谢信息的代谢相似性--对目标物和源类似物之间的相似性进行了评估。此外,还尝试通过推导预测已知类似物对的模型,量化每种相似性背景对目标-来源类似物对的相对贡献。最后,在从美国环保署毒性值数据库(ToxValDB)中提取的数据的支持下,使用 GenRA 方法对出发点值(POD)进行了预测。GenRA 预测的 POD 值与 REACH 档案中报告的 POD 值进行了比较。这项研究提供了可推广的见解,让我们了解监管呈件是如何应用 "交叉阅读 "的,以及对决策所需的相似性水平的预期。
{"title":"A systematic analysis of read-across within REACH registration dossiers","authors":"G. Patlewicz ,&nbsp;P. Karamertzanis ,&nbsp;K. Paul Friedman ,&nbsp;M. Sannicola ,&nbsp;I. Shah","doi":"10.1016/j.comtox.2024.100304","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comtox.2024.100304","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Read-across is a well-established data-gap filling technique used within analogue or category approaches. Acceptance remains an issue, mainly due to the difficulties of addressing residual uncertainties associated with a read-across prediction and because assessments are expert-driven. Frameworks to develop, assess and document read-across may help reduce variability in read-across results. Data-driven read-across approaches such as Generalised Read-Across (GenRA) include quantification of uncertainties and performance. GenRA also offers opportunities on how New Approach Method (NAM) data can be systematically incorporated to support the read-across hypothesis. Herein, a systematic investigation of differences in expert-driven read-across with data-driven approaches was pursued in terms of building scientific confidence in the use of read-across. A dataset of expert-driven read-across assessments that made use of registration data as disseminated in the public International Uniform Chemical Information Database (IUCLID) (version 6) of Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) Study Results were compiled. A dataset of ∼5000 read-across cases pertaining to repeated dose and developmental toxicity was extracted and mapped to content within EPA’s Distributed Structure Searchable Toxicity database (DSSTox) to retrieve chemical name and structural identification information. Content could be mapped to ∼3600 cases which when filtered for unique cases with curated quantitative structure–activity relationship-ready SMILES resulted in 389 target-source analogue pairs. The similarity between target and the source analogues on the basis of different contexts – from structural similarity using chemical fingerprints to metabolic similarity using predicted metabolic information was evaluated. An attempt was also made to quantify the relative contribution each similarity context played relative to the target-source analogue pairs by deriving a model which predicted known analogue pairs. Finally, point of departure values (PODs) were predicted using the GenRA approach underpinned by data extracted from the EPA’s Toxicity Values Database (ToxValDB). The GenRA predicted PODs were compared with those reported within the REACH dossiers themselves. This study offers generalisable insights on how read-across is already applied for regulatory submissions and expectations on the levels of similarity necessary to make decisions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37651,"journal":{"name":"Computational Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140063323","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Computational discovery of potent Escherichia coli DNA gyrase inhibitor: Selective and safer novobiocin analogues 通过计算发现强效大肠杆菌 DNA 回旋酶抑制剂:选择性更强、安全性更高的新生物素类似物
Pub Date : 2024-02-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.comtox.2024.100302
Shweta Singh Chauhan , E. Azra Thaseen , Ramakrishnan Parthasarathi

Bacterial infections caused by resistant strains, especially those conferring multi-drug resistance (MDR), have become a severe health problem worldwide. Novobiocin (NB) is a widely used antibiotic that inhibits the action of DNA gyrase in Escherichia coli (E. coli). The drug's efficiency is hindered by its strong binding with the resistance causing efflux pump AcrAB-TolC on recurrent exposure. Consequently, the discovery of alternate/substitute analogue compounds for the parent drug with higher selectivity could counter drug resistance. In this work, we identified potent analogues of drug NB against the gyrase B enzyme by performing high throughput virtual screening of forty analogues that includes drug-likeness properties, pharmacokinetic parameters analysis, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Our comprehensive pharmacological profiling with intrinsic analysis of selectivity and safety resulted in the identification of four potential compounds, C4 (ZINC218812366), C6 (ZINC221968665), C8 (ZINC49783724) and C10 (ZINC49783727), have better inhibitory and binding capacity against the primary target gyrase B subunit and reduced interaction with the counterpart of resistant target AcrB. These findings provide proof of concept for developing lead compounds targeting gyrase B and help in combatting AcrB-mediated drug resistance.

耐药菌株,尤其是具有多重耐药性(MDR)的耐药菌株引起的细菌感染已成为全球严重的健康问题。新生物素(NB)是一种广泛使用的抗生素,可抑制大肠杆菌(E. coli)中 DNA 回旋酶的作用。该药物在反复接触时会与导致耐药性的外排泵 AcrAB-TolC 发生强结合,从而影响其疗效。因此,发现具有更高选择性的母药替代/替代类似化合物可以对抗耐药性。在这项工作中,我们通过对 40 种类似物进行高通量虚拟筛选,包括药物相似性、药动学参数分析、分子对接和分子动力学(MD)模拟,确定了 NB 药物对回旋酶 B 的强效类似物。我们通过对选择性和安全性的内在分析进行了全面的药理学分析,最终确定了 C4(ZINC218812366)、C6(ZINC221968665)、C8(ZINC49783724)和 C10(ZINC49783727)这四种潜在化合物,它们对主要靶标回旋酶 B 亚基具有更好的抑制和结合能力,并减少了与抗性靶标 AcrB 的相互作用。这些发现为开发靶向回旋酶 B 的先导化合物提供了概念证明,有助于对抗 AcrB 介导的耐药性。
{"title":"Computational discovery of potent Escherichia coli DNA gyrase inhibitor: Selective and safer novobiocin analogues","authors":"Shweta Singh Chauhan ,&nbsp;E. Azra Thaseen ,&nbsp;Ramakrishnan Parthasarathi","doi":"10.1016/j.comtox.2024.100302","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.comtox.2024.100302","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Bacterial infections caused by resistant strains, especially those conferring multi-drug resistance (MDR), have become a severe health problem worldwide. Novobiocin (NB) is a widely used antibiotic that inhibits the action of DNA gyrase in <em>Escherichia coli (E. coli).</em> The drug's efficiency is hindered by its strong binding with the resistance causing efflux pump AcrAB-TolC on recurrent exposure. Consequently, the discovery of alternate/substitute analogue compounds for the parent drug with higher selectivity could counter drug resistance. In this work, we identified potent analogues of drug NB against the gyrase B enzyme by performing high throughput virtual screening of forty analogues that includes drug-likeness properties, pharmacokinetic parameters analysis, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Our comprehensive pharmacological profiling with intrinsic analysis of selectivity and safety resulted in the identification of four potential compounds, C4 (ZINC218812366), C6 (ZINC221968665), C8 (ZINC49783724) and C10 (ZINC49783727), have better inhibitory and binding capacity against the primary target gyrase B subunit and reduced interaction with the counterpart of resistant target AcrB. These findings provide proof of concept for developing lead compounds targeting gyrase B and help in combatting AcrB-mediated drug resistance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37651,"journal":{"name":"Computational Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139892597","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A comparison of machine learning approaches for predicting hepatotoxicity potential using chemical structure and targeted transcriptomic data 比较利用化学结构和靶向转录组数据预测肝毒性潜力的机器学习方法
Pub Date : 2024-02-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.comtox.2024.100301
Tia Tate, Grace Patlewicz, Imran Shah

Animal toxicity testing is time and resource intensive, making it difficult to keep pace with the number of substances requiring assessment. Machine learning (ML) models that use chemical structure information and high-throughput experimental data can be helpful in predicting potential toxicity. However, much of the toxicity data used to train ML models is biased with an unequal balance of positives and negatives primarily since substances selected for in vivo testing are expected to elicit some toxicity effect. To investigate the impact this bias had on predictive performance, various sampling approaches were used to balance in vivo toxicity data as part of a supervised ML workflow to predict hepatotoxicity outcomes from chemical structure and/or targeted transcriptomic data. From the chronic, subchronic, developmental, multigenerational reproductive, and subacute repeat-dose testing toxicity outcomes with a minimum of 50 positive and 50 negative substances, 18 different study-toxicity outcome combinations were evaluated in up to 7 ML models. These included Artificial Neural Networks, Random Forests, Bernouilli Naïve Bayes, Gradient Boosting, and Support Vector classification algorithms which were compared with a local approach, Generalised Read-Across (GenRA), a similarity-weighted k-Nearest Neighbour (k-NN) method. The mean CV F1 performance for unbalanced data across all classifiers and descriptors for chronic liver effects was 0.735 (0.0395 SD). Mean CV F1 performance dropped to 0.639 (0.073 SD) with over-sampling approaches though the poorer performance of KNN approaches in some cases contributed to the observed decrease (mean CV F1 performance excluding KNN was 0.697 (0.072 SD)). With under-sampling approaches, the mean CV F1 was 0.523 (0.083 SD). For developmental liver effects, the mean CV F1 performance was much lower with 0.089 (0.111 SD) for unbalanced approaches and 0.149 (0.084 SD) for under-sampling. Over-sampling approaches led to an increase in mean CV F1 performance (0.234, (0.107 SD)) for developmental liver toxicity. Model performance was found to be dependent on dataset, model type, balancing approach and feature selection. Accordingly tailoring ML workflows for predicting toxicity should consider class imbalance and rely on simple classifiers first.

动物毒性测试需要大量时间和资源,因此很难跟上需要评估的物质数量。使用化学结构信息和高通量实验数据的机器学习(ML)模型有助于预测潜在毒性。然而,用于训练 ML 模型的大部分毒性数据都存在偏差,阳性和阴性数据不平衡,这主要是因为被选中进行体内测试的物质预计会引起一些毒性效应。为了研究这种偏差对预测性能的影响,我们采用了各种取样方法来平衡体内毒性数据,作为监督式 ML 工作流程的一部分,以便从化学结构和/或靶向转录组数据中预测肝毒性结果。从至少 50 种阳性物质和 50 种阴性物质的慢性、亚慢性、发育、多代生殖和亚急性重复剂量测试毒性结果中,在多达 7 个 ML 模型中评估了 18 种不同的研究-毒性结果组合。这些模型包括人工神经网络、随机森林、Bernouilli Naïve Bayes、梯度提升和支持向量分类算法,并与一种本地方法--广义读数交叉(GenRA)--相似性加权 k-近邻(k-NN)方法进行了比较。在所有分类器和描述符的非平衡数据中,慢性肝脏效应的平均 CV F1 性能为 0.735(0.0395 SD)。过度取样方法的平均 CV F1 性能降至 0.639(0.073 标差),尽管在某些情况下 KNN 方法的性能较差也导致了观察到的性能下降(不包括 KNN 的平均 CV F1 性能为 0.697(0.072 标差))。采用取样不足法时,平均 CV F1 为 0.523(0.083 标差)。在发育肝效应方面,不平衡方法的平均 CV F1 性能更低,为 0.089(0.111 标差),而采样不足方法的平均 CV F1 性能为 0.149(0.084 标差)。过度取样方法导致发育期肝脏毒性的平均 CV F1 性能提高(0.234,(0.107 标差))。研究发现,模型性能取决于数据集、模型类型、平衡方法和特征选择。因此,在定制预测毒性的 ML 工作流程时应考虑类的不平衡性,并首先依赖简单的分类器。
{"title":"A comparison of machine learning approaches for predicting hepatotoxicity potential using chemical structure and targeted transcriptomic data","authors":"Tia Tate,&nbsp;Grace Patlewicz,&nbsp;Imran Shah","doi":"10.1016/j.comtox.2024.100301","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comtox.2024.100301","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Animal toxicity testing is time and resource intensive, making it difficult to keep pace with the number of substances requiring assessment. Machine learning (ML) models that use chemical structure information and high-throughput experimental data can be helpful in predicting potential toxicity. However, much of the toxicity data used to train ML models is biased with an unequal balance of positives and negatives primarily since substances selected for <em>in vivo</em> testing are expected to elicit some toxicity effect. To investigate the impact this bias had on predictive performance, various sampling approaches were used to balance <em>in vivo</em> toxicity data as part of a supervised ML workflow to predict hepatotoxicity outcomes from chemical structure and/or targeted transcriptomic data. From the chronic, subchronic, developmental, multigenerational reproductive, and subacute repeat-dose testing toxicity outcomes with a minimum of 50 positive and 50 negative substances, 18 different study-toxicity outcome combinations were evaluated in up to 7 ML models. These included Artificial Neural Networks, Random Forests, Bernouilli Naïve Bayes, Gradient Boosting, and Support Vector classification algorithms which were compared with a local approach, Generalised Read-Across (GenRA), a similarity-weighted k-Nearest Neighbour (k-NN) method. The mean CV F1 performance for unbalanced data across all classifiers and descriptors for chronic liver effects was 0.735 (0.0395 SD). Mean CV F1 performance dropped to 0.639 (0.073 SD) with over-sampling approaches though the poorer performance of KNN approaches in some cases contributed to the observed decrease (mean CV F1 performance excluding KNN was 0.697 (0.072 SD)). With under-sampling approaches, the mean CV F1 was 0.523 (0.083 SD). For developmental liver effects, the mean CV F1 performance was much lower with 0.089 (0.111 SD) for unbalanced approaches and 0.149 (0.084 SD) for under-sampling. Over-sampling approaches led to an increase in mean CV F1 performance (0.234, (0.107 SD)) for developmental liver toxicity. Model performance was found to be dependent on dataset, model type, balancing approach and feature selection. Accordingly tailoring ML workflows for predicting toxicity should consider class imbalance and rely on simple classifiers first.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37651,"journal":{"name":"Computational Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139743839","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Computational discovery of potent Escherichia coli DNA gyrase inhibitor: Selective and safer novobiocin analogues 通过计算发现强效大肠杆菌 DNA 回旋酶抑制剂:选择性更强、安全性更高的新生物素类似物
Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.comtox.2024.100302
S. Chauhan, E. A. Thaseen, Ramakrishnan Parthasarathi
{"title":"Computational discovery of potent Escherichia coli DNA gyrase inhibitor: Selective and safer novobiocin analogues","authors":"S. Chauhan, E. A. Thaseen, Ramakrishnan Parthasarathi","doi":"10.1016/j.comtox.2024.100302","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comtox.2024.100302","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37651,"journal":{"name":"Computational Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139832624","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Developing and validating read-across workflows that enable decision making for toxicity and potency: Case studies with N-nitrosamines 开发和验证可对毒性和效力做出决策的跨读工作流程:亚硝胺案例研究
Pub Date : 2024-01-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.comtox.2024.100300
Steven Kane, Dan Newman, David J. Ponting, Edward Rosser, Robert Thomas, Jonathan D. Vessey, Samuel J. Webb, William H.J. Wood

To reach conclusions during chemical safety assessments, risk assessors need to ensure sufficient information is present to satisfy the decision criteria. This often requires data to be generated and, in some cases, insufficient knowledge is present, or it is not feasible to generate new data through experiments. Read-across is a powerful technique to fill such data gaps, however the expert-driven process can be time intensive and subjective in nature resulting in variation of approach. To overcome these barriers a prototype software application has been developed by Lhasa Limited to support decision making about the toxicity and potency of chemicals using a read-across approach. The application supports a workflow which allows the user to gather data and knowledge about a chemical of interest and possible read-across candidates. Relevant information is then presented that enables the user to decide if read-across can be performed and, if so, which analogue or category can be considered the most appropriate. Data and knowledge about the toxicity of a compound and potential analogues include assay and metabolism data, toxicophore identification and its local similarity, physico-chemical and pharmacokinetic properties and observed and predicted metabolic profile. The utility of the approach is demonstrated with case studies using N-nitrosamine compounds, where the conclusions from using the workflow supported by the software are concordant with the evidence base. The components of the workflow have been further validated by demonstrating that conclusions are significantly better than would be expect from the distribution of data in test sets. The approach taken demonstrates how software implementing intuitive workflows that guide experts during read-across can support decisions and how validation of the methods can increase confidence in the overall approach.

为了在化学品安全评估过程中得出结论,风险评估人员需要确保有足够的信息来满足决策标准。这通常需要生成数据,而在某些情况下,知识不足或通过实验生成新数据并不可行。读取数据是填补此类数据空白的一项强大技术,但专家驱动的过程可能需要大量时间,而且主观性强,导致方法各异。为了克服这些障碍,拉萨有限公司开发了一个原型软件应用程序,以支持使用 "交叉阅读 "方法对化学品的毒性和效力进行决策。该应用软件支持一个工作流程,允许用户收集有关所关注化学品的数据和知识,以及可能的候选对照品。相关信息随后会显示出来,使用户能够决定是否可以进行交叉分析,如果可以,哪种类似物或类别最合适。有关化合物和潜在类似物毒性的数据和知识包括化验和代谢数据、毒源鉴定及其局部相似性、物理化学和药代动力学特性以及观察到的和预测的代谢概况。利用 N-亚硝胺化合物进行的案例研究证明了该方法的实用性,使用该软件支持的工作流程得出的结论与证据基础一致。工作流程的各个组成部分得到了进一步验证,证明结论明显优于测试集数据分布的预期。所采用的方法表明,实施直观工作流程的软件如何能够指导专家进行交叉阅读,从而为决策提供支持,以及对方法的验证如何能够增强对整体方法的信心。
{"title":"Developing and validating read-across workflows that enable decision making for toxicity and potency: Case studies with N-nitrosamines","authors":"Steven Kane,&nbsp;Dan Newman,&nbsp;David J. Ponting,&nbsp;Edward Rosser,&nbsp;Robert Thomas,&nbsp;Jonathan D. Vessey,&nbsp;Samuel J. Webb,&nbsp;William H.J. Wood","doi":"10.1016/j.comtox.2024.100300","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comtox.2024.100300","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To reach conclusions during chemical safety assessments, risk assessors need to ensure sufficient information is present to satisfy the decision criteria. This often requires data to be generated and, in some cases, insufficient knowledge is present, or it is not feasible to generate new data through experiments. Read-across is a powerful technique to fill such data gaps, however the expert-driven process can be time intensive and subjective in nature resulting in variation of approach. To overcome these barriers a prototype software application has been developed by Lhasa Limited to support decision making about the toxicity and potency of chemicals using a read-across approach. The application supports a workflow which allows the user to gather data and knowledge about a chemical of interest and possible read-across candidates. Relevant information is then presented that enables the user to decide if read-across can be performed and, if so, which analogue or category can be considered the most appropriate. Data and knowledge about the toxicity of a compound and potential analogues include assay and metabolism data, toxicophore identification and its local similarity, physico-chemical and pharmacokinetic properties and observed and predicted metabolic profile. The utility of the approach is demonstrated with case studies using <em>N</em>-nitrosamine compounds, where the conclusions from using the workflow supported by the software are concordant with the evidence base. The components of the workflow have been further validated by demonstrating that conclusions are significantly better than would be expect from the distribution of data in test sets. The approach taken demonstrates how software implementing intuitive workflows that guide experts during read-across can support decisions and how validation of the methods can increase confidence in the overall approach.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37651,"journal":{"name":"Computational Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139731861","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Computational Toxicology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1